www.hitwebcounter.com visitors, 1st READ the 5 page overview
www.opg.me - Mobiles UK 07763906847 - mike@rake.net

Or here you can listen to the LINK of 1 hour radio interview 11/4/2014
Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable "whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash!
These Websites published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article10(1) READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT
Sui juris, in propria persona www.opposepredatoryguardians.com

LIVE DIARY UPDATES with website: www.opg.me
& >> www.victimsofabuseofpower.com - www.ukrefugees.com
2010 to 2012 .. Read 2013 .. Read 2014 .. Read 2015 .. Read 2016

20.8.2012 - ALL AGAINST HER 'WILL' here
31.7.2015 - RELEASE my home £20million CLAIM STONEWALLED
06.11.2015 - ORDER issued to JUDGE JACKSON
18.11.2015 - NOTICE to JUDGE PELLING
21.1.2016 - EXECUTORs OFFICE, 'occupant' issue 2 estate orders
22.2.2016 - Clarkejudgment22.2.16.pdf
11.3.2016 - letter to BRITISHCONSULATE.pdf 11.3.2016
09.3.2016 - Jackson PROPOSED order 9.3.16
15.3.2016 - RESPONSE FILED 15.3.16
11.4.2016 - statementtojackson11042016.pdf
12.4.2016 - ClarkeAnn10370284order120416.pdf
13.4.2016 - angelaletter13042016.pdf
17.4.2016 - AngKevAppStatement17042016.pdf
18.4.2016 - letter to No 10 Cameron
20.4.2016 - FILED statement & demand for grant of probate
27.4.2016 - Common law demand filed on Jackson court of 'protection'
09.5.2016 - [magistrate] peter, man, sends an order that is void
12.5.2016 - peter, mans order is defaced and returned as VOID
16.5.2016 - 1st QUEENS BENCH DIVISION damages demand ordered
16.7.2016 - 2nd QUEENS BENCH DIVISION demand/CAVEAT
02.8.2016 - 3rd filing to QBD/copied SENIOR MASTER FONTAINE
09.8.2016 - woman PM theresa-mary may served claim for terrorism
16.8.2016 - woman PM theresa-mary may served reminder NOTICE
20.8.2016 - woman PM theresa-mary may is served a FINAL DEMAND
20.8.2016 - served PROOF of FINAL DEMAND PM theresa-mary may
30.8.2016 - served CHANCELLOR JUSTICE SEC mary-elizabeth truss
31.8.2016 - Email received from barbara-janet fontaine
01.9.2016 - NOTICE of DEFAULT issued to PM may/fontaine/truss
02.9.2016 - DEFAULT served with proof on may/truss/fontaine
13.9.2016 - 2ndNoticeofVoidOrder13092016.pdf on may/truss/fontaine
19.9.2016 - relinquishment of corporate for profit UK PLC citizenship
21.9.2016 - CoP HEARING NOTICE re JURISDICTION 'invitation'
25.9.2016 - DEFACED NO CONSENT Returned within 72 hours
25.9.2016 - Official solicitor PITBLADOs Interim report
25.9.2016 - response to Offsol PITBLADO & Counsel A R KEENE
27.9.2016 - Court OFFER made by JACKSON
28.9.2016 - CONDITIONAL Response to JACKSONS court offer
6.10.2016 - SURETY BONDS DEMANDED from Judges
9.10.2016 - THE FINAL STATEMENT issued to jackson
9.10.2010 - 6 Years ago a statement was issued to COP
22.1.2010 - 6.5 Years letter from OPG to MP - LOSSES/EMIGRATION
11.10.2016 - HIGH COURT new VOID ORDER
12.10.2016 - VOID ORDER returned surety bonds demanded
02.11.2016 - EMAIL to DEFENDANTS JUDGES etc
11.11.2016 - our REPLY by return to JACKSON
12.11.2016 - Transcript DEFACED returned to JACKSON RECORDED
15.11.2016 - EXECUTOR of ann passes judgement on the 'JUDGE'?
01.12.2016 - STATEMENT of security from the FAR EAST
19.12.2016 - BOTH claims to run CONCURRENT recorded delivery
22.12.2016 - 1st FILING of an AMENDMENT made to court
05.01.2017 - 2nd filing of statement re pro per se 05012017.pdf
12.01.2017 - 3rd. Hypothecation FRAUD/THEFT ESTATE TRESPASS
14.01.2017 - 4th filing to court of 1972 & EU FRAUD
16.01.2017 - 5th filing to court of STAT DEC served
16.01.2017 - 6th filing of VOID defective BIAS proceedings
13.02.2017 - 7th filing of N1 CLAIM to Queens Bench
13.02.2017 - 8th filing of EX160 fee redemption form
09.03.2017 - FAO the CEO of & @HMCTS CORPORATION
12.03.2017 - follow up email to CEO@HMCTS
14.03.2017 - follow up letter recorded to CEO@HMCTS
26.03.2017 - CLAIM of TERRORISM by FRAUD
27.03.2017 - email to BAR fraudsters to determine ENRICHMENT?
05.04.2017 - EMAIL exchange with FRAUD OFFICE
24.04.2017 - EMAIL TO OFFSOL & FRAUD OFFICE here
27.04.2017 - 5 page demand to OFF. SOL. & 'ACTION' FRAUD
http://opg.me/LIENcontract2018.pdf to ENFORCE

**********************DIARY START********************

APRIL 7 2020 Visiter No.663000 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 7 2020 Visiter No.662980 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 5 2020 Visiter No.662960 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEB 21st 2020 Visiter No.662430 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
From: "J To: "Neal Reid" Cc: "edward x young" , "tom laing-baker" , "louise haigh mp" , "privateoffice" , "ago privateoffice" , "suella braverman mp" , "Pamela Gillies1" , "lisa osofsky" , "lynne owens" , "jacob reesmogg mp" , "cressida dick" , "private office1" , "private office1"
Sent: Tuesday, 18 February, 2020 01:36:18
Rt. Hon. Sir Andrew McFarlane, Esq.
President of the Family Division Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL
Dear Sir Andrew,
I was delighted to read the following article and learn that you are seeking submissions with regard to the transparency and oversight of the Family Courts. Please accept this communication and the attachments as my submission.
I recently had the opportunity to make a similar submission to the Canadian Judicial Council and, with my knowledge and understanding of the corruption in, and the malfunctioning of, the British legal system, I was able to cite examples of what I believe the Canadian Judicial Council should be aware of and should guard against. It was accepted for consideration. I trust that the submission (given below this email) is self-explanatory; it is obviously applicable to the United Kingdom, but I shall be very happy to elaborate, should you require me to do so. I have much more information and more insights.
Please note that Canada invited submissions from everyone, including the general public. It is to be hoped that you will also do the same, as it will be the only way to get a full picture of the dysfunctionality, corruption, near criminal, and criminal acts taking place under cover of the Family Courts (and other courts) - especially the Court of Protection, and the Official Solicitor's office.
In one particular case that I am conversant with, full documentation, including a complete court file handled (with its existence denied) by Judge Simon Oliver , and the complete documentation regarding what definitely appears to be a joint criminal enterprise operated by the Official Solicitor, his staff, government and private lawyers, medical practitioners, and police, can be made available for you to examine as part of your review. In addition, I am confident that the victim and his team of retired Special Branch, very senior level, detectives will also make themselves available for comment. If you will kindly notify me, I shall be pleased to arrange a meeting at your convenience.
While under the unlawfully obtained jurisdiction of the Official Solicitor, this man was kept artificially comatose with drugs for approximately 18 months, during which time he was systematically asset stripped of his estate, which was well in excess of one million pounds. This man, now disabled with a brain injury caused by organophosphate poisoning as a result of his employment as a commercial airline pilot, was subsequently made homeless by the Official Solicitor and discarded without any income, shelter, or means to feed himself. Without any concern or safeguarding, the Official Solicitor had allowed him to be unlawfully thrown into the streets as a destitute, and he was wrongfully accused of fraud by two authorities in the UK, BUT was made privy to the fact that all of his troubles were orchestrated with criminal intent by a government lawyer at a very senior level. He was given the name of the lawyer by a senior Metropolitan Police officer, off the record, so there is no doubt as to who did this to him. The Metropolitan Police declined to be dictated to by this government lawyer.
The victim is a Royal Navy veteran who also served the Royal Family, Margaret Thatcher, and other dignitaries as a trusted jet aircraft pilot - obviously with very high security clearance. Furthermore, the house he was living in was the subject of a 'mysterious fire' while he was asleep in his bed, and afterwards a chimney sweep was asked by persons in authority to make a fraudulent report about the cause of the fire, which he refused to do. Fortunately, the subject was not killed, although the fire was deliberately set.
The Queen's Private Secretary and Her Majesty's representative in parliament, The Rt. Hon. Jacob Rees-Mogg, are both copied into this communication. I am sure that Her Majesty will be dismayed and sickened to hear this has happened to what amounts to one of her own staff, and will no doubt expect wrongs to be righted both for this man, Leonard Lawrence, and for the others. She may believe, as many do, that parliament should be taking a stronger role in ensuring that the Rule of Law is restored in the UK, as Britain has become a laughing stock and the courts are being used for as money laundering theatres and all manner of criminal activities, the majority of which are committed by criminals with law and/or accounting degrees, either directly or as accessories to the crimes.
The Judicial Complaints system does not work because no man can judge in his own cause, and the brotherhood of the judiciary and, in many cases, their Masonic associations, ensures that judges are always protected. I have only ever heard of one corrupt British judge being sent to prison, and she was both black and a woman. I think that speaks volumes in itself.
I note from the above-mentioned article that
"In a six-month survey, judges would complete a form designed by practitioners and researchers. They would record at the end of every hearing in every case key information ‘to enable one to see what is going on at all levels of the family court’ in cases under part II of the Children Act 1989 and part IV of the Family Law Act 1996."
May I suggest that, in addition, all files handled and injunctions issued by Judge Simon Oliver (in particular) be examined in great detail retroactively over much more than six months, not only for his decision-making, but also for the legitimacy of his orders and documentation? I understand that there appear to be irregularities in the paperwork handled by his clerk and himself. Furthermore, all court injunctions should be tracked and examined as they may well be the key to link directly to those cases involving corruption and, because allegations have been made, involving bribery and other criminal acts. The only reason that I mention this name is because it features on a website, linked below, where serious allegations are being made about him by a substantial number of people. Given the fact that I have also seen documentation written by this judge in the case of Leonard Lawrence, it is alarming and the allegations should definitely be checked out.
One victim of provable Family Court corruption has suggested that block chain technology be employed for audit purposes. There is no auditing of procedures or anything else with regard to individual court files. Some court documentation does not even have file numbers. Anything goes, and the public is saying that Her Majesty's courts are being run by "a bunch of cowboys in wigs". That is not to say that there are not honest and professional judges, but their numbers are dwindling.
The National Auditor did advise me personally - I believe it was in 2007 or thereabouts - that NO audits take place for individual Court of Protection files. In addition I was given inside information that nothing is ever checked by the Public Guardian or the Court of Protection and that duplicate bank accounts have often been set up in the 'donors' names at the Bank of England, with mysterious 'mistakes' happening with credits and debits.
Indeed, my own family was defrauded as a result of this lack of individual file auditing and oversight. Even after the death of my relative, Judge Baker refused me access to the file, despite the fact that I was next-of-kin. His excuse was that my relative was dead, implying that the files should therefore be sealed. Had she been alive, his excuse would have been that she was alive and therefore under data protection legal restrictions. I did manage to get access to the file by other means, and found various irregularities including a changed will that was improperly witnessed. Judge Suzanne Walker subsequently acknowledged and noted the irregularity but declared that she would probate the will regardless of it and the fact that I was alleging criminal activity. This appears to be the quality of the British judiciary.
Mental health laws are being abused in order to deprive people of both their liberty and their assets, and it is being done at an alarming rate; this is a national scandal, as much of the deprivation of liberty is for the sole purpose of silencing whistle blowers.
Private nursing homes are just one of the beneficiaries of this corruption. My understanding is that a very large number of members of parliament have declared a financial interest in the nursing home industry. Perhaps this is why only a rare few, such as the good Mr. John Hemming, MP, have ever tried to do anything about the abuse of the most vulnerable people in our society.
An investigation into the application of Britain's Mental Capacity Act by a House of Lords committee concluded, among other things, that:
“The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. Worse still, in some cases the safeguards are being willfully used to oppress individuals and to force decisions upon them.
Lord Hardie (House of Lords, UK)
A barrister becomes the judge of her client's sanity
A mother is told by her supposed legal representative that she is not 'mentally competent'

By Christopher Booker
7:00PM GMT 24 Nov 2012
Imagine you are about to face an eight-day High Court hearing at which you will fight for what is easily the most important thing in your life. You are an intelligent woman, holding down a responsible job requiring extensive knowledge of the law – which you somehow manage to combine with devotedly looking after two small children.
Shortly before the hearing, you go to meet for the first time the barrister who has been chosen to represent you. You are astonished to be told that the barrister has spoken at length to the other side in the case and read through all their evidence, but not looked at your own, even though this factually corrects almost every point alleged against you. On this basis, without having met you, the barrister has diagnosed you as suffering from a psychological condition known as “querulous paranoia”, and says that you are not “mentally competent” to instruct her. She will therefore, in seeming contravention of the rule that barristers “must at all times protect and promote fearlessly” their “client’s best interests”, disregard anything you wish her to argue in court.
Having already represented yourself three times in front of judges, and won each time, you tell her that you do not wish to be represented by someone who proposes, in effect, to argue for the other side. At very short notice, you arrange to be examined by an eminent psychologist, with long experience as an expert court witness, who, after testing you for some hours, finds you to be entirely rational and competent. You lodge the correct papers with the court to say that you have “dis-instructed” your lawyers and wish to represent yourself.
The court staff agree with your lawyers that you cannot do this, even though you have found case law which states that where someone’s “mental capacity” has been called in to question, they must have the right to challenge this before a court “unfiltered by the discretion of public officials”.
In three years of reporting on the Kafkaesque world of our family courts, I have come across many extraordinary stories, but few more peculiar than this. The last time I wrote about the ordeal this mother has been subjected to by social workers for three years, it was to report on how, appearing for herself, she had persuaded a judge to lift a Prohibited Steps Order, imposed by another judge at the urging of social workers, which prohibited her from moving from her home, in a way which made it impossible for her to work. (Twice she lost highly paid jobs due to other bizarre demands made on her by the same social workers.) She was thus free to move with her children to be near another job, which pays her £350 a day.

JAN 1st 2020 Visiter No.661900 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Mother in her Villa on her 80th year

Dec 30 2019 Visiter No.661884 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
A few days ago someone had messaged me video done by another who claims that patents have been overthrown, and I just laughed. PATENTS ladies and gentlemen is what has conquered this great nation of ours. PATENTS and the agreements thereto, run this country. There is no law, no codes and statutes, all rendered useless by patents.
The deeper one dives into this, the more clearer and clearer it becomes, it is both sad and enraging at the same time. At the moment, I am preparing a Public Notice to record against MERS on the USPTO that pulls no punches whatsoever. A direct claim against the USPTO as sponsors of the domestic terrorism of foreign agents and the business of banking. the idea is to bring all eyes to bear onto the USPTO,
There is nothing that can be denied, nothing that can be covered up, the crimes against the people of this nation is as plain as the nose on your face. I was looking at Northern Trust's patent and trademark agreements and just appalled by what I was reading, The callousness by which they commit their acts of theft stumps the mind.These criminal fucks need to hang until dead !!!!
I am sure I am gonna get some wise ass telling me to 'stop being an infant' ya da ya da ya da......no shit really !!! tell me something I do not know, or better still, shut your trap to learn something you have not a clue about ....but damn well better learn about if you want to emerge with the physical existence as a living man, as it all runs through patents.
I really and truly do not see a separation between public and private, as there really is not one. If there is any separation at all it is by undisclosed patents and trademarks, and there is nothing 'private' about these, as there hundreds upon hundreds of thousand registered since 1998. This being State Street v Signature Financial Group court ruling, the benchmark point that completely upended and did away with decades old paradigm.
The filing I am preparing cost $120 and will be against MERS, Merrill Lynch Group, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation, and will attach a key patent of ML, the one that established the banking cartel as it is designed, structured, and operates. It is ML that engineered, by patented design, that has stolen all our estates. At the other end of the spectrum, it is Nationsbank NA through the MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, via the false designations, misrepresentations, and material omission, that was the act of theft that stole our identity. This by nominating agent that delivered us right into the hands of Nationsbank NA (Bank of America).
We could, and I would like to add a key patent from each of members of the 'cartel' - WAMU, Bear Stearns, Lehman, Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, HSBC and a couple others that are not coming to the mind at the moment. 40 bucks a pop, which adds $320 on top the $120. = $440
The charge is per patent not party to, so I can add as many people to this as I desire, I believe it would be very powerful filing if we were to have 1000 names or 10,000 names to this, which would require each persons notarized signature.
Let me very clear about the magnitude of this, Anna does Anna stuff, which is all well and good, my research and study is a detailed mapping, no speculation and finger pointing, but actual real and true incontrovertible evidence that is a blow by blow, the blueprint, so to speak, of not just the US but the entire global coup d e'tat committed by the Crown Dependencies and British Commonwealth aided abetted by Her Queen Majesty of Canada,and the Commonwealth of Australia.
Is Sandy Smith is successful in her efforts. we will have a multi-award winning journalist, including a Pulitzer,give us the real pubic face that this really needs.
(note: I am not overly concerned with grammatical correctness or punctuation to posts that are expressions of thoughts and ideas, not final documents. If you are offended by this than piss off)

Dec 14 2019 Visiter No.661780 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Dear Ms King,
Thank you for your email. I am not disappointed at all, on the contrary in fact. What you may not have been aware of is that I have broad knowledge of both constitutional, as well as statute law. That is why the cabal of abusers in office do not like me, because, as the purported Chancellor of our High Court stated "I know this game as well as he does". In fact however, I know it better and I am not corrupt or dishonest either.
The terminology, prerogative powers, refer to those powers that can be exercised which are unique to the sovereign. The powers belong to the Monarch, however by convention they are exercised by the prime minister and in some cases by cabinet members in the form of those Orders in Council.
John Alder, Professor of law at Newcastle University defined royal prerogative as; ‘’a collection of special powers, rights and immunities vested in the Crown that is not conferred by Parliament’’. Prerogative powers are powers that are inherent and peculiar to the Crown. Those powers originate under common law and not laws of Statute. The powers are residual and majority of the powers are exercised by the executive government in the name of the Crown and no Act of Parliament is necessary to confer authority on the exercise of such powers.
The royal prerogatives consists of legal attributes and matters of convention or practice. The courts recognise that these attributes exist, and when necessary, the Courts will enforce them. Frankly it is a nonsense for you to suggest that an Order in Council or exercise of the prerogative powers in any matter in the public interest is ultra vires, on the contrary, they become law in their own right. Your response conflicts with the very oath that all members of privy council must undertake, of which I do quote:
“You do swear by Almighty God to be a true and faithful Servant unto the Queen's Majesty, as one of Her Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person, Honour, Crown, or Dignity Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your Power, and either cause it to be revealed to Her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will, in all things to be moved, treated, and debated in Council, faithfully and truly declare your Mind and Opinion, according to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all Matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors, you will not reveal it unto him, but will keep the same until such time as, by the Consent of Her Majesty, or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty, and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty. So help you God”
The Privy Council formally advises the sovereign on the exercise of those prerogative powers, and corporately (as Queen-in-Council) it issues executive instruments known as those Orders in Council, which among other powers enact Acts of Parliament. The Council holds the delegated authority to issue Orders of Council, mostly used to regulate certain public institutions. The fact that you come back to me to state that Privy Council has no power to intervene undermines the very purpose of Council and the prerogative powers it exercises for the Monarch in the first instance. Your response is proven to be entirely contradictory. What I want to know, is who, which member of Privy Council instructed you to write back to me in this context?
Prerogative powers were formerly exercised by the Monarch acting on his or her own initiative. Since the 19th century, by convention, the advice of the prime minister or the cabinet, who are then accountable to Parliament for the decision, has been required for the prerogative to be exercised and they do so via your office. The Monarch remains constitutionally empowered to exercise the royal prerogative against the advice of the prime minister or the cabinet, but in practice would only do so in emergencies or where existing precedent does not adequately apply to the circumstances in question. When those office holders are damaging our constitution by abusing the rule of the laws of the United Kingdom, it is clear that such emergency has arisen and it is further evidenced in fact, that this action is long overdue. It is in the public interest to deal with corruption of our justice system and our public authorities. Those actions are extremely damaging to the constitutional principles that underpin our democracy as a whole, to our economy and to the human rights of every civilian that has been caught up as a result of the diminishment of the rule of the laws of the United Kingdom that ensues as a result, as well as the many that are likely to be in the future unless this issue is resolved.
I submit that the principles of our constitution are fundamentally self-preserving. They do not allow provision for diminishment or destruction. The Act of Settlement (12 & 13 Wi. 111. c.2) affirms that the laws of England are the birth right of the people thereof and all the kings and queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm ought to administer the Government of the same, according to said laws and all of their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same.
The supremacy of the rule of law is our birthright:
The birthright (privileges or possessions that a person has or is believed to be entitled to as soon as he is born) of Englishmen and women depends upon the supremacy of the rule of law, its observance and their right to control their laws. The right to self-determination under the rule of our own law is the very fabric of the liberty of our society. The rules of law and custom that determine that we have as a "birthright" our liberty are all the prerequisite duty of office to uphold and maintain. This is sworn to be upheld by those taking up any office under the Crown. You, My Lord, I and every man and woman in the United Kingdom all have the responsibility of preserving this birth right gift from our forbears so that in turn, every future generation may benefit from and enjoy this liberty under the rule of their laws.
It is your duty in the role in Office of Privy Council, to assist me and every other Englishman and woman under our jurisdiction, in my quest to restore the integrity and impartiality naturally expected of our judiciary. Failure to do so when it is your duty to do so will likely result in civil unrest and potentially all out warfare where our constitutional rights are diminished by the corrupt establishment, the people shall resist and defend our constitutional principles and the rule of law. Enough of this nonsense, evasion of the truth and concealment of the fraud by the public authorities of common purpose. Your response just highlights the issue I raise, because indeed, it does precisely what I described in the last sentence.
The Succession to the Crown Act, 1707 (6 Anne, c 41), declares it high treason for anyone to maintain and affirm, by writing, printing or preaching in effect "that the kings or queens of this realm, by and with the authority of Parliament are not able to make laws and statutes of sufficient force and validity to limit and bind the Crown and the descent, limitation, inheritance and Government thereof”. Whilst the criminal offence of high treason is abolished, the legal precedent does remain and your email to me does indeed contradict this precedent entirely.
Now, let me make it abundantly clear that it is your utmost duty, as it is of all members of Privy Council according to the Oath of Privy Council, to make Her Majesty aware of this position, by presenting my evidence across the three cases I have provided to Lady Justice Macur, that prove beyond doubt that the Chancery Court and its officers are engaging in acts of corruption and have diminished the rule of law whilst acting in collusion with central government officials to asset strip innocent civilians, using the façade of the public authorities, the family and insolvency courts as the vehicle from which to do so.
In essence, the Lord Chancellor is corrupt, so is the Lord Chief Justice, the Attorney General's Office and the Permanent Secretary to the Justice System, the Home Office and the Treasury, along with many of the purported judges sworn in to act "without favour or illwill".
Our Prime Minister pledges to sort out our justice system but yet this corruption and abuse of the rule of law and acts by the public authorities that are clearly and flagrantly against the interests of justice prevails throughout its core, advocated by the ones as the top. It is no good recruiting more police officers when the courts are rotten to the core with corruption. The position is entirely counter productive and is an abuse of taxpayer's funds by virtue of. One must first address the problematic justice system and make an example of those that have advovated this corruption in breach of duty, to dissuade others that may consider adopting the same paths in the future. Freedom of the press is compromised, that too is a major driver of this corruption. This letter to you however, shall indeed be made available to quite a number of journalists I am working with.
I ask that you write back with Privy Council’s most detailed response to my letter and that you do process my application for an Order in Council where I shall lay my information to prove the issues I raise across several high profile cases, along with the potential resolutions to be considered and articulated to Her Majesty by its members.
You will note, at the bottom of this email chain there is categoric proof that Heaton, as well as two separate magistrates courts, have been deleting evidence of fraud and corruption, acting in dishonest concealment to assist the offenders. Those that engage in this conduct are, by viture of their actions, also guilty therefore of the principle indictable offences. The entire case I have presented needs looking at in some intricate detail and I am the one to assist the honourable and upstanding officers under the Crown to bring this corruption to an end. The police are just a waste of resources, they are utterly incompetent, dishonest and corrupt by the majority and they do not have the expertise nor the will to deal with these issues, they are controlled by the ones at the top advocating the corruption.
I trust this makes the position clear and I look forward to hearing from you.
Respectfully yours,
On 13/12/2019 16:00, PCO wrote:
Dear Mr x,
I fear you will find my reply disappointing, but as I have previously explained, the Privy Council has no power that enables it to intervene in the matters you raise. The Privy Council has no power to take any view on a matter of fact or law – that is the prerogative of the courts. The Privy Council is simply the mechanism through which interdepartmental agreement is reached on those items of Government business which, for historical or other reasons, fall to Ministers as Privy Counsellors rather than as Departmental Ministers.
If the Privy Council were to seek to investigate the matters you raise, there is no doubt that it would be acting ultra vires and that its actions could be challenged by way of judicial review. I am sorry to have to send you a disappointing reply. I know from experience that many people find it difficult to believe that the Privy Council cannot help them in such cases, and we have in the past been accused of unwillingness, rather than inability, to act. But the fact is that the Privy Council simply has no power to intervene in this case.
Yours sincerely
Ceri King
Privy Council Office
Room G/04
1 Horse Guards Road
London SW1A 2HQ
0207 271 3292

March 23 2019 Visiter No.658713 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

March 9 2019 Visiter No.658512 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEB 6 2019 Visiter No.658069 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOV 10 2018 Visiter No.656745 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCT 26 2018 Visiter No.656577 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCT 9 2018 Visiter No.656347 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCT 9 2018 Visiter No.656345 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCT 8 2018 Visiter No.656342 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Lynne Owens,
Director General of the National Crime Agency. (The most senior woman in British law enforcement).
Sara Thornton, Chair of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC).
Donald Toon, Director of Prosperity (Economic crime and cyber crime) National Crime Agency. Nick Downing, Assistant Chief Constable, Head of Serious Crime, NPCC lead Financial Investigation & Proceeds of Crime
Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor. Government Legal Services Clerk to Mrs Justice Theis, High Court Liaison Judge, Thames Valley Area
Dear Ms Owens,
Ref: Only 0.8% of Action Fraud cases are solved
More than 96% of cases reported to the UK’s national fraud reporting centre Action Fraud go unsolved, exclusive Which? Money analysis can reveal.
But we unearthed some data tucked away in the appendix of a written submission to the Home Affairs Select Committee by the City of London Police. It showed that in 2016-17, local police solved 3.1% of fraud cases, while 85% were unsolved, and in 12.1% of cases were ongoing. Combining these secondary figures with the 25% dissemination rate, we concluded that 0.8% of Action Fraud cases are solved, 96.3% are unsolved unsolved and 3% of cases are ongoing. (The percentages don’t quite equal 100 as they are based on rounded figures.)

OCT 8 2018 Visiter No.656335 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

by Maurice Kellett
Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven
- Christ in Luke 6:37
Police will willingly protect corrupt judges. Corrupt solicitors and barristers abound. This is the true state of the present UK justice system. When people don’t stand up against corrupt judges and policemen that is the most dangerous part of it. They gain more confidence to carry on with yet more evil acts against innocent victims. On web site http://www.mason-rule.com there is part of the evidence to show what happens when a judicial and police victim stands up and defies their evil. These people have nothing to do with justice whatsoever. They are criminals covering under the umbrella of alleged justice. They are amongst the very reasons why terrorism exists. It will exist just so long as they exist. Under the New World Order, which is now underway, more of the worlds downtrodden will turn more to terrorism. World leaders will condemn terrorism but will continue to ignore the reasons that terrorists exist. Just so long as the general public are led by evil people the outcome will itself be evil. I don’t condone terrorism but I can say that I know one of the main reasons of why it exists. There are many hypocrites within British authority, those same hypocrites help to make sure that those with similar tendencies will always remain in the chain of authority.
In 1986 I was battered and then struck by a car that was deliberately driven at me after I had uncovered corruption at then British Coal Estates Department.. The court proceedings at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear were illegal. The single magistrate who on sat on the matter was not qualified to act alone. There were in fact two magistrates sitting on the bench but he was a close friend of the man who had battered me and the struck me with the car he deliberately had driven at me. It would have been against court rules for him to have sat on the case in these circumstances. When I raised that matter , even though he sat on the bench, he claimed that he had stood down. Magistrates generally have a few days notice of cases coming before them so they can withdraw from the proceedings in cases such as this. The Clerk to the Justices of Houghton Magistrates Court, along with the Lord Chancellors Department were party to the cover up of those illegal proceedings. After years of trying to have the matter brought to true justice the reaction of authority has been to give me more trouble by continued corruption so rife amongst their ranks. I have recently made a claim for damages against Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court and demanded a full inquiry into my case and into others to see if I was the courts only victim since 1986 or whether there were others. I have also formally refused to accept the jurisdiction of that court until such Inquiry is set up. The new Clerk to the Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court has not replied to my Statement of Truth setting down the facts of 1986 and the years following it. I delivered that statement to the court several weeks before Christmas. I can only arrive at one conclusion. Northumbria Police have promised over the past few years to investigate the matter of the courts illegal proceedings. But that has been nothing short of a smokescreen set up while they have plotted yet further acts of corruption against me. Even the Crown Prosecution Service situated at Washington, Tyne-Wear attempted to blackmail me. The Northumbria Police Authority have failed to answer a letter I sent to them several months ago asking what Northumbria Police were doing in regard to my allegations of bent judges Durham Constabulary have also failed to act on the matter. of bent judges at the Durham County Court. There is also the matter of perjury that was used against me.
Member of Parliament Mr Fraser Kemp has known about my allegations for several years. Previously he had passed me on to former MEP Alan Donnely. Alan Donnely then informed me that what was being done to me was nothing to do with him and he would not act. Only now after a further approach to him, has MP Fraser Kemp referred my case to the RT Hon. Baroness Scotland QC Parliamentary Secretary to the Lord Chancellors Department. He has also referred my case to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. That was several weeks ago but to date nothing further has been heard from Mr Kemp.
Durham Constabulary have falsely alleged that when a judge lies it is a judicial decision and is therefore protected. That is in fact a lie. A judge who decides to lie and use fraud to arrive at his or her judgement is not protected other than by bent policemen. Such a judge is a criminal by reason of such acts.
To date the mob I mention above, for that is what they are, have cost me my thirty year marriage and the death of my father. They have also caused me other severe damage. With the assistance of bent judges operating within the North East Court Circuit they engineered my bankruptcy. It was two days later that my father collapsed and died after my alleged bankruptcy was published on the front page of the Sunderland Echo newspaper. He had been extremely upset at what was being done to me and begged me to give up my fight against our corrupt justice system because he said that ultimately it would kill me.. My conscience would never allow me to do that. It was the damages awarded by a criminal judge named on http://www.mason-rule.com who is still being protected by both Durham and Northumbria Police which allowed my alleged bankruptcy. The proceedings before that judge were also illegal and he used considerable fraud as a means to arrive at his judgement. He also allowed my civil law opponent the use of very material perjury. Some of the evidence of that fraud etc. is published on http://www.mason-rule.com It is known that several police forces are monitoring this website. These scum operating within the UK justice system have made my life so bad that I am no longer afraid of death so I am no longer afraid of them.
"And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell-fire."
- Christ in Matthew 10:28
By means of their corrupt practices, they have provided me with evidence of what they are capable of doing to people such as myself. I am using that evidence. And providing it to others. I will never give up until these people are brought to trial. Prime Minister Tony Blair promised us a fairer Britain. Britain is less fair now than I can remember in the fifty eight years of my life. We remain the laughing stock of other countries who have what can be called a credible justice system. I think it is now time for judges to be elected as in the North American system. The old boys network, often with Masonic membership or leanings, who are responsible for the employment of judges. That must be brought to a halt as soon as possible. People holding public office must be made to declare any membership of any secret society as a first step to trying to achieve something resembling a true justice system.
I can no longer rely on the police for protection. A visit to http://www.mason-rule.com will give the reason for this. I cannot rely on the courts either for justice but that has been the situation for a long time now. Bent judges don’t like being exposed. Straight judges don’t like bent judges being exposed either. My life has been threatened and a threat was also made to burn my home down unless I stopped publicising judicial and police corruption much of which has its roots in Freemasonry. Northumbria Police simply did not want to know about that. Neither did they want to know about a man who threatened that my wife, daughters and I were to be stabbed. He even repeated that threat to a Northumbria Police officer who took no action on it. When we heard evidence that the threat to burn down our home was probably real, my wife begged me to sell our home and run. I could not do that so she went and there effectively ended my thirty year marriage.
In the name of God Almighty all I ask is that the general public wake up to what is going on. My health is now such that my efforts to publicise the situation, even if I eventually get justice, will not help me much. I have concluded that what I am doing may well cost me my life but what is a life when it has been made pure pain and suffering at the hands of the corrupt justice establishment? It is a sad reflection when Tony Blair has recently been preaching at home and abroad on the matter of justice when Britain remains second only to Turkey for the abuse of human rights.
Maurice Kellett
16A The Lyons,
Tyne-Wear DH5 0HT.
e-mail: maurice.kellett@ntlworld.com
6:12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth Seal (using his "Key"), and, lo, there was a great "earthquake"; and the "sun" became black as sackcloth of hair, and the "moon" became as blood; (Please see "The Four Horsemen of The Apocalypse & the Two Witnesses" Booklet for the Bible Prophecy "Code") 6:13 And "the stars of heaven" fell unto the "earth", even as the "fig tree" casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind (Ezekiel 13:13). 9:13 And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God,
It can´t be much more before the "earthquake", that is, a great upheaval of people...
In this context the scriptural code "sun" means The Throne of David - (Psalm 89 v 36) - which is the British Throne. The "Stone of Scone" is Jacob's Pillar and Israel's Throne of David.
and the "moon" Reflects the light of the SUN. The SUN is the British Throne and the "Commonwealth" reflects her light and power (like the moon does to the sun).
please see http://jahtruth.net/horse.htm for the complete document.

SEPT 29 2018 Visiter No.656210 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Actor John Cleese has said he wants to leave the UK because he is "fed up with the corruption in this country".
The Fawlty Towers star previously revealed he is heading to warmer climes in the Caribbean this November.
On Friday, he told Good Morning Britain: "I'm going to buzz off in November because I'm fed up with the corruption in this country.
"This country is in a terrible mess at the moment."
The 78-year-old, who co-founded comedy troupe Monty Python in the 1960s, also criticised newspapers, saying they "censor news".

SEPT 27 2018 Visiter No.656175 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 19 2018 Visiter No.656041 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
"Personage and Barratry"
This is what the lawyers, bankers, and politicians have used to enslave you. It is a crime known as “personage”. By arbitrarily creating an Estate trust named after you and claiming to own this thing they created, they have falsely claimed to own you and your assets and to literally buy and sell “you” on stock exchanges, ship “you” out of ports, and tax “you” for doing things you’ve never done. After all, there is no law against enslaving an ESTATE trust, is there? Or arresting a slave? Or charging a tax on importing revenue. Hand in hand with personage comes “barratry” — the crime of knowingly bringing false claims into court. So what happens every day, when charges are brought against the ESTATES of “dead men” who are standing right in front of the judge and jury? Barratry — a crime that is appropriately named after the “Bar Association”. Look at the front page of any law suit that has been filed in the past seventy years and there you will have proof in your hand of both personage and barratry being committed against the individual people falsely named as “DEFENDANTS”. They are being deliberately confused with foreign estate trusts merely named after them and they are suffering the crimes of bothpersonage and barratry. When you appear in person you appear as part of the trust! when you state your name for the record YOU ARE CALMING TO BE THE TRUST! the other person oxford english definition is A MASK PRIMARILY WORN BY ACTORS ON THE STAGE!
Companies & corporations registered, under a foreign country such as the offshore tax haven Gov/UK corporation has no personnel jurisdiction over someone residing in england a separate entity/country, It would be fundamentally unfair for your rights and liabilities to be determined by a court of law in a jurisdiction in which you had no contact and to which you do not consent to their jurisdiction.
Meaning you would have to have been in the foreign countries jurisdiction, when you gave consent to their jurisdiction/ liabilities before they have personnel jurisdiction over you in a separate country/ jurisdiction, in other words unless you agreed to contract with the foreign agent in their foreign jurisdiction they have no jurisdiction with you here in england which is a separate jurisdiction to theirs
The offshore tax haven GOV/UK CORPORATION has no jurisdiction in a separate country Know as the land mass called england
Get them to prove they have personnel jurisdiction over you when you reside under a separate jurisdiction to theirs.
If you respond to the name you are the company! The dead body. The doctrine of identification is also the traditional method by which companies are held liable in most countries under the principles of the common law. According to this theory, the solution for the problem of attributing fault to a corporation for offences that require intention was to merge the individual within the corporation with the corporation itself. If we respond to the name we are the estate!!!! What we have to conclude from this is A name gets us into trouble If we identify within the name it gets us into trouble As they have set up a trust/vessel/corporation for us how can we take some sort of control? THIS IS HOW A DECEASED JOHN DOE ESTATE WORKS
Beneficiaries Executor
When a person dies, there estate is administered by personal representatives If the deceased person made a will, their personal representative will be the executors appointed in the will Where there is no will, personal representatives are appointed by the court under letters of administration and are called administrators and in this case,the person's estate will be distributed according to the law of intestacy.
We did not leave a will when we were declared dead or lost at sea!!! ATTENTION~LEGAL~DEPARTMENT To Whom It May Concern
“Please Note: I legal~fiction (in red lower case) The living, am fully aware that any/all claims made concerning a (CROWN~CORPORATION~OWNED~NAME) is, in fact, an admission of fraud where false impersonation is concerned and is a (CAPITAL~CRIME)
Inasmuch as you, the sender, have mailed something under assumption/presumption of law that I, the living, am somehow related to the (CROWN~COPYRIGHT~NAME~REGISTERED) at birth is, in fact aiding and abetting another into fraud should I accept;
Any/all things/items mailed are, in fact contracts inasmuch as acceptance is assumed/presumed due to a (UPU/VATICAN~CITY,~ STATE~POSTAL~CODE~ADDRESS/OPEN~MAILBOX~ACCESS) involved and attached to the (CROWN~OWNED~NAME) that is not me/my property where it is (INTENT~TO~COMMIT~ENTICEMENT~TO~SLAVERY) on you, the senders part, of intent to commit fraud joinder as such and, for which you are fully liable in your currant slave status;
You, the sender are, in fact acting in fraud by virtue of a NAME/TITLE/OFFICE you are impersonating and are engaging in a deliberate attempt to aid and abet fraud with “unclean hands” where acting in good faith is instantly removed henceforth/heretofore and are criminally liable and guilty of/for the intent to do so knowingly/unknowingly;
Further continuance of your attempts to procure joinder via deceptive measures knowingly/unknowingly render proof of intent to so whereas the rightful owner of any/all (LEGAL~NAME/S,) namely the (CROWN~CORPORATION~CITY~OF~LONDON~STATE~TEMPLE~B.A.R.) owns all/any liability for any/all (REGISTERED~CORPORATIONS~LEGAL~PERSONS) etc.
Any/all furtherance/pursuit of (LEGAL~JOINDER~ENTICEMENT~ TO~SLAVERY~FALSE~IMPERSONATION) is and, shall henceforth, be deemed intent to do so via (MAIL~FRAUD) whereas the names you seek are fictional corporations, legal entities and property of the crown corporation under copyright; Any/all attempts/acts of use of (COPYRIGHTED~INTELLECTUAL~PROPERTY) is, in fact, a crime of (COPYRIGHT~INFRINGEMENT) against the legal owner of any/all aforementioned assumption/presumptions of name fraudulently claimed by you/enticed of another. Please contact the rightful owner of this (CORPORATE~DEBT~LIABILITY) to settle any/all legal accounts you falsely believe to be mine, the living, where the original intent to deceive via non-disclosure belonging solely to the (CROWN~CORPORATION~CITY~OF~LONDON~STATE~TEMPLE~B.AR.~LORD~ MAYOR~ (both elected/appointed mayors) CITY~OF~LONDON.) Have a nice day.
:Usufruct - "Any deliberate or systematic use of the given name of any living individual man or woman by any incorporated entity pretending to represent them or their material interests to create legal fiction entities operated under-in-or for their name without the full knowledge and consent of that individual is a prohibited abuse of the rights of usufruct."

SEPT 17 2018 Visiter No.656010 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
The Queen Found Guilty
It has been established by incontrovertible evidence in the matter of Paul Anthony Hill [Mu-ad Dibh] v. Elizabeth II "Regina", that the Queen violated her Coronation Oath three days after she accepted it, and that she and her Government have functioned in constructive fraud since June 6, 1953.
There is additional evidence that both the Queen's Father and Grandfather did the same.
The people of the British Isles are owed a Christian Monarch occupying the throne of The United Kingdom. The entire Coronation process is designed to guarantee the acceptance of that role and responsibility---- and to assure the people of their Queen's accountability to Christian law and principles.
One must also remember that the Queen is the titular head of the Church of England, an additional Office that she is obligated to serve in Good Faith and Honor.
Instead, three days after her Coronation, Elizabeth II abdicated the Christian throne and occupied the pagan "Chair of the Estates" instead.
The immediate impact of this is the unlawful conversion from Public Law to private corporate law being practiced throughout the realm in otherwise Public Courts, the use of "legal" rather than "lawful" presumptions in these courts, unlawful conversion of private property into public property, enslavement and press-ganging of living men by a process of personage and impersonation, and all the other evils we have witnessed.
This additionally means that the entire British Government has been functioning as a criminal organization since the 1870's, and this has implications for the entire world --- not just the British Territorial United States.
When we started our investigations we naturally thought that this whole problem was endemic to the United States, but soon found that it had proliferated worldwide and had its factual modern genesis during the reign of Queen Victoria.
Exactly how and by whom this continued to be "pulled off" despite all the protections and provisions against it was not immediately apparent, but the Queen's abdication of the lawful and Christian throne provides the answer.
She willfully converted the mechanisms of her Government and the Judicial System to the service of the pagan "god" Baal, and adopted the Talmud as the form of "law" to be used. Like her own abdication, these "unstated" provisions were implemented with no Notice given to anyone in a position to object.
This Gross Breach of Trust and the profound violation of The Rule of Law which is involved must be addressed by Parliament and by the United Nations and by the Geneva and Hague Conventions. Mr. Trump, please take note.
England has had no Queen since 1953 and all actions undertaken since then are in doubt, as are the actions and authorities of her predecessors back to the 1860's.
The secretive abdication of the Christian throne and occupation of the pagan Chair of the Estates is an act of purposeful, criminal fraud against the people of England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, the British Territories and the Commonwealths worldwide-- including the British Territorial United States.
Elizabeth II's secret abdication is the single most virulent source of the criminality which has infested government services corporations worldwide, created the Matrix of Corporate Feudalism, and reduced governance to the level of modern day Robber Barons.
We have the right, the responsibility, and the power to require an end to this circumstance----bankers, kings, and queens be damned.
By Operation of Law, The Throne of The United Kingdom stands vacant. The Queen is "civilly" dead, murdered by her own hand 65 years ago. The Parliament was adequately informed of this circumstance and has done nothing. It is time for international intervention or there shall be no Rule of Law and no safety for anyone anywhere on this planet.

SEPT 15 2018 Visiter No.655981 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 13 2018 Visiter No.655945 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 29 2018 Visiter No.655717 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

THE CEO of the MOJ Susan Elizabeth Acland Hood Andrews has received and signed for delivery of the 3rd and final true bill in connection with the NOTICE of LIABILITY contract served upon her last year where upon adequate time has been conveyed for her as CEO to correct FRAUD upon and within HMCTS.
The upshot being that now, we will proceed to engage with a grand jury of common law piers to obtain a jury endorsed enforcement order to collect upon the contract http://opg.me/LIENcontract2018.pdf

AUG 11 2018 Visiter No.655346 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Dear R Austin
I refer to your request for information that you emailed to the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner on the 31 August 2014. I have treated your request as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
In answer to your question:
The Police and Crime Commissioner for each policing area is a corporation sole established by Statute. The relevant Act of Parliament is The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 that provided for the creation of Police and Crime Commissioners. A corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single sole incorporated office occupied by a single person. It enables the office of the Police and Crime Commissioner to pass from one office holder to the next successor-in-office, giving the position legal continuity with subsequent office holders having identical powers to those of their predecessors.
From a commercial perspective, The Police and Crime Commissioner, as a corporation sole, is the legal contracting body who enters into legally binding contracts on behalf of the Chief Constable and all the property, rights and liabilities that were held by the former Police Authorities that were abolished in November 2012 are now vested in Police and Crime Commissioners as the office holder.
Police and Crime Commissioners were created as both the Conservative Party and Liberal Democrats had raised concerns about the perceived lack of accountability of the former police authorities to the communities they served. Following the 2010 election, the Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition agreement set out that:
"We will introduce measures to make the police more accountable through oversight by a directly elected individual, who will be subject to strict checks and balances by locally elected representatives".
The core functions of Police and Crime Commissioners are to secure the maintenance of an efficient and effective police force within their area, and to hold the Chief constable to account for the delivery of the police and crime plan Police and Crime Commissioners are also responsible for the appointment, suspension and dismissal of the Chief Constable.
The intention behind the Government creating the office was that Police and Crime Commissioners were likely to be far more transparent to public scrutiny and accountability to their local communities than the former Police Authority's that they replaced.
I trust that this satisfactorily answers your enquiry.
If you are unhappy with the way the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester has handled your request for information, you can request a review by writing to:
Mr Steve Mycio, Interim Chief Executive, Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester, Civic Centre Complex, Chorley Road, Swinton, Salford, M27 5DA.

AUG 9 2018 Visiter No.655322 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 6 2018 Visiter No.655250 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
In a recorded phonecall today to the MOJ we enquire as to why the Justice Head DAVID GAUKE & CEO SUSAN ANDREWS assume justification in stonewalling an injustice enquiry filed by ROYAL MAIL recorded delivery 6 months ago.
We have documented such stonewalling meticulously to demonstrate FRAUD upon and within HMCTS. Though you hold the ability to demonstrate that the due process of justice can be obtained by man, without doing so, you also hold the liability for the torts inflicted.
We again file today upon you the injustice suffered that you have had 6 months to investigate and act, but failed to do anything but STONEWALL with SILENCE.
©Mike & Ann:CLARKE mike@rake.net
From: mike:clarke www.opg.me
Sent: 06 August 2018 13:05
To: 'david@davidgauke.com'
Cc: 'Susan.Acland-Hood@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' ; 'mayt@parliament.uk' ; 'alan.eccles@publicguardian.gsi.gov.uk' ; 'len lawrence' ; 'mandy dunn'
Subject: RE: The STATE of UK JUSTICE - causing TORTS upon the living
NO RESPONSE from 6 months ago
Resending today by fax email & Royal Mail RECORDED
From: mike:clarke www.opg.me
Sent: 01 March 2018 16:10
To: 'david@davidgauke.com'
Cc: 'Susan.Acland-Hood@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' ; 'mayt@parliament.uk' ; 'alan.eccles@publicguardian.gsi.gov.uk' ; 'len lawrence' ; 'mandy dunn' ; 'Freedom Talk Radio'
Subject: The STATE of UK JUSTICE - causing TORTS upon the living
The STATE of UK JUSTICE 1st March 2018
FAO the secretary of STATE for JUSTICE
Dear David
As man, Mike: of the clan CLARKE I write you as the principal secured party creditor in due course and living will executor over MICHAEL RAYMOND CLARKE & ANN CLARKE whom are no longer lost at sea and have not been so since 2012.
The corporation in which your employed has committed cimes against us.
I hereby file upon you a brief background that is in the public domain.
Dear David & Susan
It all started a long time ago, over 20 years to be exact. Mum suffered an accident in 1995. In 1998 the acting Solicitors persuing damages where assessing my mothers needs over her life expectancy laid down at 83. The claim was for 1.7 million in damages but over the course of the next 2 years divisions within the family would cause differences that would affect the claim. In short in 2001 the claim was settled by compromise at £775,000.
For 6 years prior to the award arriving I alone had looked after my mum whom was wheelchair bound and doubly incontinent. The award arrived and solicitors deemed mum was incapacitated to manage such large funds and me and mum disagreed.
Specialists were drafted in whom derrived mum had capacity but the court doctor disagreed and so the Judge opted to keep control of her money using a solicitor to manage it. The major concern from family was the charges. The solicitor whom got the job expressed in writing that his charges will not be infringing upon the capitol designated for mum’s care using the words that, the family can “rest assured”. The Judge Denzil Anton Lush also in writing the judgement stated that awards for fees do not simply fall on a patient’s funds and in fact it is unlikely that charges would exceed what was estimated as laid down of £2000 per year.
The 1st year without any knowledge conveyed to mum or me his charges were £26,377 The second year without any knowledge again conveyed, his charges were £14,000 So, for the 1st 2 years we were told the estimated charges to be no more than £4,000 were in fact x 10 £40,377 This was discovered in the 3rd year. Whilst the deputy stole £500 per week he only gave mum n me £200 to live on. This is were sparks began to fly, as you can imagine. We now are approaching nearly 2004 We came to the conclusion this court was very sinister indeed and it was not as was advertised. Various run in’s with this regime occurred and in 2008, so dissillusioned with the Uk we decided to emigrate to Spain in March 2008. No issues came from any party and we were free to go.
Having found a rental property in Spain demands were made to release mums remaining cash estate to her new country of residence which was refused. Not only did the court of protection for 'England and Wales' keep mums cash in their coffers, they failed to open a euro account for the country of residence with the balance.
Protestations of many were made over 5 years to 2013 because on entering Spain the exchange rate was £1 to 1.5 euro but was diminishing to eventual parity of £1 to 1 euro over the years and so the allowances each month were becoming less and less due to exchange rate losses. We calculated over 5 years that the continued mal administration of mum’s cash estate had diminshed by exchange rate losses alone of over £100,000 The question was raised with our MP, that such mal adminstration losses need compensation to the client by the OPG who would not address the issue alongside the overcharges we had made countless complaints about & over 10 years the charges should have been £20,000 but were in fact £150,000. Basically, without a full assessment, in short, the OPG had a liability to their client in our opinion of a loss exceeding a quarter of a million pounds that as mum s sole carer could clearly see something was seriously wrong.
Though mum moved abroad 2008 and all her furniture went with her, the court prevented an exchange of her property to a Spanish villa not once, but twice, when we finally reduced the price to sell it the judge stopped it. Numerous campaigns were addressed with nothing but contempt, so eventually in 2011 I went to see the British constitution group and met with Roger Hayes and Guy Taylor whom advised a commercial lien be served on the solicitors which was completed in December 2011 but as 2012 came in these solicitors that failed to respond to lien, were told that research on their properties was to follow in order to attach the debt to their houses. That’s when the shit it the fan, the solicitors shot to court with a case upon me for harassment that I denied consent to as I deemed it too BAR bias for a fair trial, jury demanded. They continued in my absence and finally in 2013 January they held a committal to prison hearing using their own judge, to judge in their own cause a nominated court of protection judge to issue a prison sentence upon me that fortunately me n mum had fled the country with the day before. Roger Hayes and GUY Taylor attempted to represent me in court and they served several documents on to the judge before he issued his void order.
5 Years later we still are fighting to have the order VOIDED meeting brick walls.
In a nut shell the court committed theft, fraud, mal administration upon mum topping it off with an act of treason, to imprison the whistleblower son/carer by judging in their own cause in an effort to protect the court of protection NOT the client whom has suffered not only £250,000 minimum losses but also her home too that has become jewdicially ringfenced in the UK where we can’t live in it peaceably and neither can she sell it. We are trapped abroad renting a flat that is inadequate where in order to pay for it, I need to go out to work several hours per day instead of providing the care needed for my 77 yr old disabled mum whilst her £250,000 house stands in the UK, languishing and the court continues to ignore all attempts to bring the perpetraitors into a jury court of our own, denying all rights to due process.
You could'nt make it up if you tried.
Take into account this is a very brief shortened down version of the real nightmare that fortunately has been documented in diary format upon our website www.opg.me over the years inclusive of recorded conversations etc. The worst part that revealed itself this last year 2017 is that they are still placing heavy charges upon that property that have been hidden/concealed, for so called services that also have been hidden & concealed!!! Mike, mike@rake.net and Ann www.opg.me 07763906847
Respectfully I seek your comments with some urgency.
Related links
http://opg.me/will20082012.pdf a living will that has been invoked
http://opg.me/5pageoverview.pdf an overview of the reality suffered
http://opg.me/LIENcontract2018.pdf THE LIABILITY CONTRACT served & perfected on CEO MOJ
http://opg.me/22022018toPMTM.pdf The pre cursor of interlocutory NOTICE on PM TM @ No10

JULY 20 2018 Visiter No.655000 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Master Tobe Hayden Leigh, has been investigating and exposing injustice against Joe Public, for an number of years. And then, it happened to him.
In the wake to the release of the infamous movie, the Great British Mortgage Swindle, the police are taken on a journey, through the belly of illegal lending practices. The crime is disguised and camouflaged, in the Civil Courts. The criminal cartel, manufacture bogus proceedings, and the system coerces the unsuspecting victims, to engage a member of the Bar Association (Solicitor), who will never question the authenticity of the proceedings, and invariably get huge fake bills, rubber stamped by the “COURT”, to pay for their “RESPECTABILITY”. Tobe Leigh, like millions victims, is:-
1) Being first labelled a Bankrupt when the Court has not actually issued any Bankruptcy Proceedings against him.
2) This false DATA is widely published, for others to use as justification to exploit him.
3) He is labelled a trespasser in his own home, so that “HIGH COURT ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS” can use violence to throw him on the streets and steal his belongings.
4) Police can be placed under severe duress, by the e-gang, to classify the crime, as a “CIVIL MATTER”.
5) Leaving Tobe no other option, than to go back to the e-gang member in a “CIVIL COURT”, waiting eagerly to dismiss his clear evidence, as being “TOTALLY WITHOUT MERIT”.
6) Then if he challenges the crime, be slapped with a “CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER”
7) If he then disobey the e-gang, HE will be brought into criminal proceedings, for breaching a “COURT ORDER”, where he may be imprisoned, or even worse, “SECTIONED”.
If you or your love ones, have experienced, or is threatened by the e-gang scam, please send your story, along with this petition, to your MP here www. writetothem. com .
The constitution has to be restored, by the collective effort, of each and every man and woman, who are the true Sovereigns.
Sign and Share the Petition ----
VIDEO http://bit.ly/SevenStepScam

JULY 14 2018 Visiter No.654915 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 11 2018 Visiter No.654850 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 11 2018 Visiter No.654841 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 10 2018 Visiter No.654836 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Even though her money & home has been stolen by Judge Peter Jackson we continue with our life in Spain regardless of the lawless manner the Protection Court continues to protect unaccountability, feeding their own vile masonic buddies.

JULY 8 2018 Visiter No.654780 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 6 2018 Visiter No.654768 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
COURT OF PROTECTION protects itself

JULY 3 2018 Visiter No.654676 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
COP Official Solicitor

“It is said in the Court of Protection that decisions are taken via the judge, who relies on an expert witness.” (John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD), 17 Mar. 2011 Westminster Hall)
“Official Solicitor” = often appointed as litigation friend even though the Official Solicitor ought really to be appointed as a litigation friend of last resort.
“Contempt of Parliament” = where effort is being put into stopping external scrutiny of the processes.
1. Example of wrongful doing by the Court of Protection:
Last week, I raised the issue of Fred Goodwin and Lee Gilliland. Everyone tended to concentrate on Fred Goodwin and the banker issue, but I think that the issue of Lee Gilliland is more important.
The Gilliland case is slightly complex, and I cannot refer to some things, because proceedings are continuing. However, in the historic proceedings to which I referred last week, he had his mental capacity removed, on his right to instruct a solicitor, on the basis of a report from his GP which was written some five months after his GP had last seen him and which he has still not seen—I spoke to him about half an hour ago.It took me a little time to get into the issue of mental capacity, when I first encountered it a number of years ago, because it seemed so shocking.
Yes, we have the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which specifies circumstances under which people’s capacity can be removed, but I was surprised to find a situation in which someone who seems coherent could be told, basically, “You’re too stupid to tell a solicitor what to do. And, because you are too stupid to tell a solicitor what to do, we will appoint what is called a litigation friend”—one must distinguish between a litigation friend and a McKenzie friend, because people sometimes confuse the two.
The litigation friend acts on someone’s behalf. The Official Solicitor is often appointed as litigation friend even though the Official Solicitor ought really to be appointed as a litigation friend of last resort.
With the agreement of the Official Solicitor on behalf of Mr Gilliland, a decision was made by the court. The house he lived in was to be sold, with half the money going to him—roughly £50,000. However, he was to be evicted and, of the £50,000, more than £37,000 would go to his solicitor. Who is protecting Mr Gilliland’s interests?
He did not start out as a particularly wealthy individual, then the state came in and said, “You are too stupid to instruct a solicitor, but you can’t see the basis upon which we have made that decision. Oh, and by the way, we are going to take three quarters of the money you might have had, turfing you out of your house and putting you on the streets, and give it to your solicitor.”
I do not see that as treating Fred Goodwin on the one hand and Lee Gilliland on the other hand equally. Fred Goodwin can afford to spend a lot of money on getting an injunction, or even a super-injunction under which someone cannot even talk about him having the injunction. I will come to what I call hyper-injunctions.
One of the freedom of speech issues is that media organisations are generally commercial organisations, and there gets to be a point at which it is not worth their while trying to challenge the system and to get information out. With that, we return to the article 9 issue, because our freedom of speech in the House is obviously on behalf of the citizens. We need to know of grievances so that we can raise them and talk about them publicly, so that the citizens of the UK can know. If it costs £20,000 or £30,000 in legal fees to write an article, in most circumstances a media organisation will just give up. The freedom of speech is basically sold down the river, because of the costs of the legal processes. (John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD), 17 Mar. 2011 Westminster Hall, Column 142WH)
2. Example of wrongful doing by the Court of Protection:
That is not really a long assessment in terms of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Where in the assessment is there an attempt to assist her in making her decision? There is no record of it whatsoever. The assessment is given as a sufficient basis to, basically, imprison her. It was in secret and there was no accountability and no second opinion at that stage.
I wrote to a Minister who told me to write to the Care Quality Commission, which told me to write to the solicitors, who did not respond.
I wrote to the council, which told me: “The judge has banned us from talking to you.”
I wrote to the Official Solicitor—this is a mental capacity case and the Official Solicitor has been appointed to deal with her best interests—and I got a letter back that said:
“You are correct when you suggest that I take the view that I am not accountable to you as an MP for the way in which I act in individual cases.”
We have a sort of vacuum here. There is no proper accountability in this area whatsoever.
Her sisters were talking to me and were threatened that they would be in contempt of court if they continued to do so. One of the sisters is a constituent and another one lives just outside my constituency.
We have here another contempt of Parliament, where effort is being put into stopping external scrutiny of the processes.
In the case I am talking about, a large sum of money has been spent on keeping this particular girl in the custody of the state—she is effectively a secret prisoner. The family has expressed the view that the true reason she was taken into care some 10 years ago was to prevent the investigation of an allegation of sexual assault against a member of staff of the city council. They think that the reason this kicked off is that, when she came back to Birmingham, someone did not want the investigation of the sexual assault from 10 years ago to kick off. I have seen some of the police records, and the family have a reasonable case for saying that that might be the motivation underlying such a massive expenditure of public money. Whatever way we look at the matter, this is a dreadful case and it is very clear what is going on. It has been said that her father is a risk to her. However, he died last July—possibly partly as a result of the stress of the case—so he is not much of a risk now. It is therefore difficult to understand what the justification is for what has been done.
The Official Solicitor’s answer is that he is accountable to the court. However, I cannot see where the real scrutiny of that process is. Let us consider the case I mentioned earlier—the £37,000 case—which also involved the Official Solicitor. Obviously, Alastair Pitblado does not trundle around the country like Father Christmas, visiting every court for a few seconds. We are talking about members of his staff, who will vary in calibre. As far as I can see, there is no real scrutiny of the Official Solicitor. Yes, the court may spot something, but it is very difficult. Who is actually acting to protect somebody against what the Official Solicitor does? That is a very difficult question. In addition, I have asked if I can go and see the constituent concerned and have been refused. So, someone is being held incommunicado from her Member of Parliament. (John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD), 17 Mar. 2011 Westminster Hall, Column 147WH)

JUNE 27 2018 Visiter No.654590 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 27 2018 Visiter No.654580 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 25 2018 Visiter No.654560 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

referring to the this PDF submission

JUNE 18 2018 Visiter No.654417 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

the link to the article

JUNE 13 2018 Visiter No.654335 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 13 2018 Visiter No.654330 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
The Kingdom of the Dead
My recent article about the Queen occupying The Chair of the Estates really hit a nerve, and apparently most people in the English-speaking world were totally unaware that the Queen has been occupying a different office other than the one required by The Coronation Oath all these years----though that has to be apparent in retrospect, with or without John Anthony Hill.
I have examined the evidence, too, and it is incontrovertible.
The Queen took the Oath and three days later broke it, on the record. This had the effect of "killing" her role and rule as Christian Monarch and ended her obligation to fulfill the Public Law and her vows made in apparent Bad Faith to the people of the United Kingdom.
Instead of operating in the capacity of Elizabeth the Second, she has been operating in the "dead" corporate capacity of ELIZABETH II. Her Consort, Prince Philip has similarly been operating in a dead corporate capacity for sixty years.
Her chosen Office since then has involved creating bogus claims of abandonment against the land jurisdiction owed to the States and People of the actual United States, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere, while her husband's role has been to profit from the creation of equally bogus Cestui Que Vie estate trusts, Public Transmitting Utilities, Wards of the State, and similar "derivatives" that yield among other benefits profit from insurance and bottomry bond scams such as "Life Force Value Annuities" that are in fact owed to us and to our ancestors.
Every office and entity is dead or presumed to be dead in this entire matrix of falsehoods and illusions. This is very convenient for the criminals involved in profiteering from this, as the dead cannot defend themselves, cannot be heard in court and cannot bring any claim or complaint against the perpetrators of these vile schemes.
Also, in the case of "dead" corporations and all legal fictions, such as public and private corporate offices, there is no law against any of the most terrible offenses we conceive of. You can murder a corporation and drink its blood, you can rape and strangle a corporation, you can draw and quarter a corporation, you can steal from a corporation and trespass upon it with impunity. You can enslave a corporation and require it to perform in any way you wish.
This, of course, gives the criminals motive to do what they have done to mischaracterize and impersonate and enfranchise billions of people, rendering them all subjects and legal fiction entities in their Kingdom of the Dead---all as an excuse to also pretend that we are not flesh and blood and are not the natural owners of our Trade Names and are in fact dead legal fiction entities subject to criminal abuse and mistreatment at the hands of their henchmen and Priests of the Dead operating the Bar Associations.
Time to break the spell, and become not only alive, but truly aware of the entrenched evil infesting high places.
This evil has been ensconced in the Holy See and in Westminster and in Buckingham Palace where it has silently grown like a cancer for generations, in all the royal houses of Europe it has threaded its web, and those who would not succumb to it -- like Czar Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm II and Prince Frederick and Princess Diana, they have murdered and warred upon.
This is, in the end, a spiritual war, which must be won in the spirit and in the flesh. Only by steadfastly honoring the Truth and honoring each other can we win. Only by establishing our eternal wisdom, strength, resolve, and determination to have, be, and do what is right, can we overcome. We must reach very deep in our souls and accept the burden of knowing how banal evil is, how mundane its methods, how insidious its creep. And we must oppose it with all our will and all our wit and all our vigilance.
Who could imagine on June 5, 1953 that the radiant young Queen, crowned only three days before, would declaim her true crown and birthright?
Was she perhaps as clueless and misled and misinformed as everyone else?
If these outrages should stand, and the Throne of the United Kingdom be thus dishonored and cast aside---what can it mean for her Successors?

Fear of Populism
The top agenda item at this years infamous Bilderburger meeting was the rise of Populism worldwide. Translate that as peasants with pitchforks.
It can also be interpreted as "Nationalism", which is, of course, anathema to the Globalist swine who wish us to live in one big penal colony, wearing the same clothes, eating the same nasty food, and obeying their every whim.
It's good that they are afraid of Populism/Nationalism and in general, afraid of us.
It's a fine day when those purporting to be "your" government feel a chill up their spines, which is the way things are meant to be. Keep up the good work. Keep educating yourselves.
Keep the pressure on the politicians, bankers, and others responsible for The Mess. Keep centered on peace and refuse all attempts to manipulate your countries into war.
Keep bringing forward your dignity and your demand to end all vestiges of Commercial Feudalism, all false claims and presumptions against your Good Name and estate, all attempts to continue on with the business of Mystery Babylon as usual.
Refuse all attempts to call you "Mister" or "Missus" or "Miss" which are all terms used to address British servants and British military personnel. Refuse all attempts to mischaracterize you as a "resident". That is code-speak for British Territorial personnel living on our shores on a temporary basis to provide "essential government services".
If someone starts talking about the "United States"--- ask which one, and nail them down. The actual United States formed in 1776? The Federal United States formed in 1787? The Territorial United States formed in 1789? The Municipal United States formed in 1790? Or some other god-forsaken version of "United States" formed how, when, where and in what jurisdiction?
Take absolutely nothing for granted. Leave no strings flapping.
Always tell judges, politicians, and anyone else who needs to know, that you have never knowingly or willingly accepted Territorial or Municipal citizenship and that you don't consider it any benefit. Say so in your Testament, when you direct your End of Life affairs.
Write your Testaments on the fly-leaf of your Bibles and when you bring that book into these venal courts, know that the only reason anyone ever stood up when the judge walked in, was because in our courts the judges always carried the Bible with them. We stood up out of respect for the scripture which is the embodiment and basis for the Common Law.
" I’ve just had a lightbulb moment...you know that the rich socialite’s children always seem to have a “trust fund” to draw on whilst us so called “lesser lights” have to bow and scrape just to get by...what if these socialites had been taught in their private schools how to access their birth certificate funds? We have constantly been told that the cestui que vie trust is an internet myth or a figment of the imagination which is bullshit however what if these silver spoon twats had access all along? They always seem to be pulling wealth out of their arse seemingly at will and almost never ever need to go to court...." Or , being 'special' just get digits created out of thin air?

the new OLIVER CROMWELL moment

This is a Short Version "Abbreviated" of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights laws.
That covers every single man woman and child and all their private properties. whom are the true owners of their property... easy for all to understand for themselves... ;) (Y) ... this is all taken from our Magna Carta and also the Bill Of Rights. and many our of laws customs beliefs and our way of life for over 800.000 thousands of years...

JUNE 1 2018 Visiter No.654125 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 1 2018 Visiter No.654124 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 1 2018 Visiter No.654122 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 1 2018 Visiter No.654120 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 28 2018 Visiter No.654011 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

link to story

MAY 22 2018 Visiter No.653851 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
TO ADDRESS IT?? click to enlarge

MAY 20 2018 Visiter No.653817 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 9 2018 Visiter No.653531 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

The Link to the story

MAY 7 2018 Visiter No.653500 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 7 2018 Visiter No.653490 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

PUBLICATION to follow shortly

APRIL 30 2018 Visiter No.653305 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 30 2018 Visiter No.653302 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 16 2018 Visiter No.653009 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 15 2018 Visiter No.653000 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Having taken a 2 week break off the campaign trail.. I post this pic taken today@3pm of my 77 yr old disabled mum who has been, and still is being, asset stripped by the back door, from masonic jewdicial BAR racketeering filth.
Operating under the guise of the so called 'court of 'protection'', from within the OPG Office of the 'PUBLIC Guardian'.
Without any accountability or recourse to the equitable remedy of any justice by the fraudulent denial of due process within HMCTS that has been userped by these criminals, to undertake such asset stripping upon the vulnerable.
Using the criminal acts of PERSONAGE & Barratry sprinkled with a combination of FRAUD by failure to disclose relevant material facts, that have been effective as breach of trust by patent trademark fraud upon the living flesh & blood being, whom was never ever 'lost at sea' under the Cestui Que Vie ACT of 1666, except, for the convenience of the pirates at large within the masonic JEWdicial BAR racketering scum, that conspire to pervert real justice, that have monopolised the LEGAL system for its own financial benefit on a the grand scale of SLAVERY!

MARCH 29 2018 Visiter No.652630 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 29 2018 Visiter No.652625 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 29 2018 Visiter No.652610 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
ALL 7 PAGES HERE kendostdannyknightALL7.pdf


MARCH 28 2018 Visiter No.652595 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 25 2018 Visiter No.652532 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

I want to tell you about a simple little case from an obscure little court, where the findings and verdict posed such a danger to the money power, that they tried to prevent the judge from even entering the verdict. He refused. One week later the judge had an “unfortunate” fishing accident and died.
As for the lawyer/individual who brought the case and won it to the jury? Well he was coincidentally disbarred. Oh and the case findings? they were “nullified” on procedural grounds because well, “that’s the law”. And now of course, any lawyer who attempts to cite the case, well, they too face sanctions and possible disbarment by the “licensing” system the government runs that “allows” them to operate in the “legal system” the government runs. Remember, it is all just “following the law”. What, do you not “support law and order”? You probably hate kittens too then.

MARCH 24 2018 Visiter No.652513 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 23 2018 Visiter No.652500 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Making Sense of the World - Update for March 23, 2018
The central point to keep in mind is that the Powers That Were are scrambling like roaches hit with a bright light because after six generations, we are waking up and realizing what was done to us --- and who did it.
The Queen and her brood going back to 1822 and the former Popes ---Benedict XVI and Francis excluded because they accepted responsibility and corrected the operations they inherited--- are the primary Bad Actors.
Things went South in Britain in the 1860's after Prince Albert died and Benjamin Disraeli convinced Queen Victoria to finance the Raj in India by selling out her own people at home. From there, the same evil "System" of corporate enfranchisement was used throughout the Commonwealth and eventually throughout the world.
National Governments were eaten away from within by this silent maggot-like fraud scheme, until only the shells were left and only "the appearance" of justice. The so-called "military industrial complex" had found a new backdoor into our wallets and the flowering of a new brand of commercial feudalism was the result-- a form of feudalism ten times worse than the serfdom of the Middle Ages.
Now the promoters of this System are caught, red-handed, their criminality and fraud exposed for all the world to see and we are witnessing exactly what you would expect:
(1) Stalling tactics and faint denials as they attempt to come to terms with the evil that many -- even in government -- were unaware of or studiously trying to ignore;
(2) Attempts to batten down the hatches and secure their own safety and the safety of their ill-gotten accounts and treasuries;
(3) Spawning of all sorts of groups and individuals to "explain away" the circumstances and off-load evidence of guilt to Third Parties (Global Debt Facility, Kingdom of Manna, Earnest Rautschild, Wolfgang Struck, Chinese Elders, etc.,)
(4) Spawning of Counter-Control groups and programs that seek to put a new face on the old system (OPPT, TDA, etc.) or which seek to minimize and control the amount owed back to the people ("Freedom Checks", etc., which are really measly reparations payments).
(5) Frantic Clean Up efforts to try to destroy evidence. (Serco is right now at the US Patent Office desperately trying to sponge the records of what they and their masters have done here, but it is too late.)
The overall result is a vast panorama of lies and excuses and confusion. And just as it says in the Bible concerning the latter days, people are running here and there seeking saviors and believing first one lie and then another and the "wars" and rumors of war and the natural disasters are all piling on hot and heavy.
God isn't creating or mandating this Mess. He just saw it from afar.
It's the logical result of corrupt leaders trying to cover their tracks and come up with something to replace Commercial Feudalism --- or, what they have spent most of their effort doing so far --- find a way to repackage and re-brand it as something else, and still shove it down our throats.
So don't take any wooden nickels, get lost in any distractions, follow any Pied Pipers or forget what I have told you. (1) If you don't want to be mistaken as being "at war" -- don't fly the war flag. Fly the civil flag and post the black and white private property signs. (2) Practice saying, "I am not a citizen. I am a national of this country, standing on its land jurisdiction." (3) Remember that none of us are interested in "liberty"--- we are intent on securing "freedom". (4) We don't live in any "democracy"-- we live in fifty republican states. (5) There has never been "a" Republic per se, only an unincorporated Union of fifty republican states, known as The United States of America.
Remember that there is a logic to everything and that everyone and everything on this Earth grows in an organic way, starting off as a small, seed-like effort or idea, and building gradually into whatever it is going to be. We have the advantage now of being able to restore our lawful government using the tools and history of what we already built---and which these rats have been intent on tearing down--so we don't have to start from scratch.
For all those just waking up and wondering what to do and how to connect to or restore your lawful land jurisdiction government --first, you have to clean your own house and re-establish your own correct political status. Here are the steps:
1. Return your lawful Trade Name in the form "John Michael Doe" to the land and soil of your birth state. Do this by recording (not registering) your "Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Deed of Re-Conveyance" laying claim to your Given Name and all derivative NAMES declaring their permanent domicile as the "land and soil" of ____________ (California, Ohio, Wisconsin, etc.). If your own county recording office won't accept this, find another county that will.
2. Then, as an extension to the Deed, record your Act of Expatriation from any presumed Territorial or Municipal Citizenship.
3. Then as another extension to the Deed claim up each Name/NAME via a Common Law Copyright and Habeas Corpus declaration using the Certificate of Assumed Name.
4. Then as another extension to the Deed claim up your physical body and biological identity using a Paramount Claim of your DNA and all derivative emanations from the moment of conception.
5. Then as a final extension to the Deed record your Mandatory Notice as a Foreign Sovereign.
Examples of these documents have been posted on my website: www.annavonreitz.com and The Living Law Firm hopes to have a free packet of instructions and fill-able forms available very soon.
Okay, so, you have your Names/NAMES back on the land and their political status properly identified and it is time to rejoin the other Americans who aren't [Territorial or Municipal] United States Citizens or citizens of the United States in operating your lawful government. This requires launching your own local county jural assembly and after that, your State Jural Assembly.
For help doing this, contact the Michigan General Jural Assembly, which has been up and operating since the 1980's. They have developed materials and assistance sources to help everyone else get properly organized. They can be contacted via email at: http://1stmichiganassembly.info and host both a National Conference Call every Thursday night at 9 P.M. EST ( 1-712-770-4160, Access Code 226823#) and a National Hotline service (1-989-450-5522) from 2-7 P.M., Monday through Thursday.
This isn't anything controversial or scary or improper and nobody can interfere with your efforts so long as your own political status is properly declared.
So get your horse in front of your cart, folks, join the discussion and get your local county organized. We need a majority of the States set up and functioning by November 1, 2018. Meantime, as Red Green says, keep your sticks on the ice and stay alert.

MARCH 23 2018 Visiter No.652484 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 22 2018 Visiter No.652480 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


MARCH 19 2018 Visiter No.652390 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 19 2018 Visiter No.652380 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 19 2018 Visiter No.652378 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Dark Side Of The Occult Exposed 14 March ·
You could take the Birth Certificate (Sea) and the Certificate of Live Birth (Land) to present you have the right to stand on both the "Land" and the "Sea"
Then ask the Judge, bring out his Bond, his Oath, his Identification, to prove he has the lawful right to sit behind the Bench (Bank)
He will refuse to give it because he doesn't have any right to try a living man as he is acting a Foreign Corporation (Corpse) having no real standing in Common Law meaning he can be held liable for bring false claims against a living man which means he could be the one who loses his Dominion to the Mineral & Energy Wealth should he accept to show you his true self
The book is called the UCC connection how to free yourself from legal Tyranny
By all means, study the information and verify the massive amount of it that can be verified as what the "law" of man system is claiming upon you, but do not look for actual solutions to the problems created by the "law" of man system within the "law" of man system. The claims of the system are illegitimate by their very nature
The entirety of this knowledge fall's within the legal ("law") system created by man to deceive and control others. The "law" of man system aka government, statism "authority", is either illegitimate or redundant. The only legitimate law is natural law, a free name for which is natural principles, which goes hand in hand with true anarchy.
This is correct, but they will still often ignore your authority if you consent to be identified as a citizen, which includes being called "Mister" or "Miss" or "Mrs." or by any title whatsoever, and also if you fail to identify your own capacity as a private non-citizen national and don't have a record of that political status.
Every 5 years you have to file a UCC-1 to stake claim on any bonds they bring against you. The UCC-1 shows you are the beneficiary and must be paid first for any claim brought against you. When in court ask if they have a claim against you.

MARCH 18 2018 Visiter No.652357 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 16 2018 Visiter No.652310 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 15 2018 Visiter No.652276 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
FAO President of FAMILY COURTS James Munby &
FAO Professional Standards Lancashire Police IPOC IPCC
FAO Action Fraud
Cc’d Freedom Talk Radio – LenLawrence – Amanda Dunn &
Managing Editer Daily Mail
14th March 2018
In a letter to 3 Judges issued recently…
In a letter issued to CEO MOJ Susan Acland Hood
In a letter issued to Sec. of State LORD CHANCELLOR David Guake
In a letter to the PM TM @ No 10 she used the word today against the RUSSIAN state ‘DISDAIN’ is this exactly what herself and her ministers are doing upon us and so tacit agreement to contract is appropriate
In a letter issued to POLICE and professional standards/IPCC
Regarding SATANIC - Psychiatric ABUSE & MENTAL HEALTH FRAMING FRAUDS to ASSET STRIP the Elderly and restrain/imprison WHISTLEBLOWERs
A self executing contract was issued by the DENIAL of DUE PROCESS thus access to courts. A final true bill will be issued shortly to ALL concerned whereafter NOTICE to DEBTORS & ENFORCEMENT WILL FOLLOW
Copy of sample letters

Ref CoP OPG No 10370284 Ann: Clarke
FAO CEO of OPG Alan Eccles
27/2/2018 ???
NOTICE to Agent is NOTICE to Principal
NOTICE to Principal is NOTICE to Agent
Interlocutory Notice of LIABILITY SMART CONTRACT ‘self executing’ – silence is tacit agreement
Dear Mr Eccles

My name is Mike: do not respond to me with any title as I no longer claim one.
Reference to the LIVING WILL of Ann: part 24.
I am the living will executor over Ann: Clarke whose fidiciary responsibility is to manage and ensure her estate has been and is kept safe.
I do know for a fact with proof that it has not been kept safe under the guidance of the OPG.
We have and still are on a very long journey, in forced exile, to prove what has been covered up by the OPG / court of ‘protection’ and its agents, whom have conspired to defraud Ann: and further to imprison the whistleblower/carer/son/living will executor.
The OPG under CEO Martin John also played his role and with our evidence building we formerly wish to lay charges against the surety bond that was used to indemnify Ann from loss.
Your website shows information regarding this matter here
We now formerly demand that the bond that was used, be brought forward to us, to make claim upon it for the damages done.
We currently have under contract for the injustice the agent HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES / then CEO MARTIN JOHN & the CEO of the MoJ Susan: ELIZABETH ACLAND HOOD ANDREWS by the linked contract here …
http://opg.me/LIENcontract2018.pdf The matter may also be attached to the prime minister THERESA MAY subject to an appropriate response from her.
We demand under an SAR, subject access request all data of any sort, digital or email data & or correspondence in relation to the file held 10370284 especially, FULL DETAILED ACCOUNTS.
You have 7 days to respond to this matter before we will take the step of adding you personally, privately and commercially, to the jointly and severally, liability contract above linked.
I trust this matter is clear.
www.opg.me – www.opposepredatoryguardians.com
From: mike:clarke www.opg.me
Sent: 14 March 2018 19:15
To: 'President.FD.Munby@ejudiciary.net'; Baquiran, Jay
Cc: 'Susan.Acland-Hood@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk';
'mayt@parliament.uk'; 'HQ-ProfessionalStandards@lancashire.pnn.police.uk';
'david@davidgauke.com'; 'David Scott'; 'brian@ukcolumn.org'; Mike Robinson; 'alan.eccles@publicguardian.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: FAILURE TO RESPOND GIVING TACIT AGREEMENT by AQUIESSENCE to Contract link to actual email
PM TM issuing a silence is tacit agreement smart contract to RUSSIAN president PUTIN followed by a DISDAIN non-response obviously fighting his enemy using PM TMs own tactics!

This is the underlying bulk training by the United Kingdom MINISTERIAL postions, that of COMMON PURPOSE to use DISDAIN in shear contempt of those seeking remedy where THE TRUTH is the essence of the injustice!
A truth that the corporate bodies, do not deal in their court business models but where contracts can be self executing in their world and so using their own weapons, we turn the guns upon them.

MARCH 14 2018 Visiter No.652262 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
link to the article sound cloud by UK Column

MARCH 12 2018 Visiter No.652186 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 11 2018 Visiter No.652136 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

The link to the letter of 2 years ago to judge
The link to the Video of mum 2 years ago refusing.

MARCH 7 2018 Visiter No.652015 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
by FAMILY COURT JUDGE linked here

MARCH 5 2018 Visiter No.651960 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 5 2018 Visiter No.651953 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Lee Cant
State terrorism against Child Right Campaigners continues in the UK with 74 year old Sabine McNeill locked up in a North London cell in Islington 12 hours ago for making a phone call to a charity.
Sabine attended Holborn Police Station on 19 February 2018, for allegedly breaching her £20,000 bail conditions in a counter-alleged theft of the bail money by Police. At a hearing on 26 February, she was ordered House Arrest and fitted with an ankle tag on 28 Feb.
On 4th March 2018, Police officers turned up at her door as friends had come to visit her to do her shopping. She was hand-cuffed and taken to Islington Police Station. She is due to appear in court Monday 5th March 2018.
The bail relates to a disputed Order made before half time, when a 6 day trial between 11 -18 July 2016 ended in a "No Case to Answer". Judge Worsely heard 4 witnesses from a church in Hampstead, giving evidence from behind a curtain, who claimed to have been harassed by child rights campaigners on 22 March 2015 who were holding a silent vigil outside a church where serious crimes against babies and children had been alleged by 2 siblings, a boy 7 and a girl 8. Judge Worsley sent the jury home at 3,30 on Friday 15 July 2015, only to declare that he would be issuing a Restraining Order preventing co-defendants, Neelu Berry & Sabine McNeill from giving their defence and incriminating evidence against the teachers and priests at the church and schools.
The trial was used to spy on supporters of the Defendants, with Jake Clarke being subjected to Mental Health Framing Frauds and Lee Cant arrested at his home on 13 September 2016 held in Bethnal Green Police Station. As Neelu Berry waited in the waiting area, she was hand-cuffed and locked in a cell and subjected to a mental health assessment the next morning. After she told the Psychiatrist that she was a qualified pharmacist who specialised in Mental Health and was an Expert in two reports of criminal cover-up by the NHS Trusts, Police, Coroner and the law courts, he decided there were no mental health issues.
Equity Lawyer, Edward William Ellis has filed 40 corruption claims in the High Court without remedy, leading to the conclusion that the UK courts are unfit for purpose. He has now provided mass remedy templates for those who are fees exempt to file their own corruption claims on the basis that mass remedies will be the default due to mass corruption.
The documents for the Gold Mandate Prosperity Payments 1-11 of www.swissindo.net, namely the Voucher M1 Master Bond in the sum of $1,200,000 plus a monthly amount of $1200 per adult and $600 per child, plus the Debt Burden Liberation Certificate DBLC for corporate debts to be written off in the sum of $150,000 and the same amount for personal debts can also be downloaded. The Prosperity payments are overdue since the banking license expiry on 17 August 2015.
Donations welcome
Neelu Berry
3 Peel Drive
Ilford Essex IG5 0JR UK

MARCH 4 2018 Visiter No.651923 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 2 2018 Visiter No.651884 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
‎David Robinson‎ to Practical Lawful Dissent.
23 February at 15:07 ·
Good afternoon constitutional protectors....
I think its time we had a reality check don't you?
Lets face the facts and take stock of the extremely dangerous situation that we are all in. Many of us in this group have thus far acted honourably, truthfully and peacefully and where has it got us....I'll tell you where...NOWHERE!!...but we did what was right nevertheless.
Some of us have spent a number of years putting our so called public servants on Notice of the completely evidential facts of the crimes of the state and what have the police done?...that's right, they have arrogantly ignored us completely.
The secret corporate so called courts have STOLEN over 70,000 of our children to benefit paedophiles who rape and kill them in secret, gagging parents with threats of imprisonment whilst the policy enforcers aid and abet this disgusting crime.
Well I'm fucking sick of it and I'm not going to take it any more! This is war and the body count is going to get a lot higher if we don't make a real stand very soon and stop it in its tracks.
We have allowed injustice after injustice to go on unabated, each time this happens we become more and more desensitized to it and, they commit more and more blatant acts of tyranny against us all.
The TV is full of programmes that enhance this desensitization, have you not noticed the amount of violent films, immoral sexual content in shows that promote naked dating as normal etc....we are degenerating mentally as a species.
If its not the above content its programmes inducing fear of police and bailiffs taking action against people that have done bugger all in many cases....”cant pay we'll take it away” for example....its not even 'wont pay' its “cant pay”.....these programmes are there to programme you into accepting this shit, and if you watch TV then it does just that whether you realize it or not....
REALITY CHECK FOLKS!.....many people are also being covertly attacked by secret invisible weapons and I am one of those people. The high pitched whistling/buzzing in the back of my head is constant. It is torture, and I can sense that it is causing me to experience disorientation, memory loss, apathy and my eyesight is getting more blurred by the day. The headaches are frequent but I will not let it stop me from standing up for the truth, they are going to kill us all gradually which they have been doing in a ratchet by ratchet way for decades now....why do you think cancer is so common these days? whilst they beg you for your money to find a bloody cure...how stupid we have all become!
Insanity is growing within the population but we hardly notice it because it is being done gradually in more ways than I can mention. They are masters of manipulation, they know how the brain works and they know how to destroy it, make no mistake about that.....they know how to manipulate public consciousness by changing our perceptions of reality.....channel 4 even blatantly states it every day on their channel....”changing perceptions with documentaries on 4”...wake up!
I don't give a damn if you think what I have written is insane because it is the TRUTH and YOU bloody well know it is!...for many people it is too difficult to accept so the mind makes up excuses to avoid it, “its just the way it is”....”what can I do about it”.....etc....well you are not going to be able to avoid the truth forever because soon we will be under full militarised occupation in our land when Eurogendfor are openly on our streets with diplomatic immunity and guns. Then the EU arrest warrants will be enforced and people like me will no longer be around to warn you of the nightmare that we are all sleepwalking into. I would rather be dead that tacitly agree to the disgusting crimes they commit daily.
Whilst we allow all this shit to carry on they are destroying ALL sovereign Nations on the planet because there can be no sovereignty in the New World Order that is ALREADY HERE!
Those of you whom are old enough to remember the 1970's, just think back at how things were then (not that it was great back then to be frank) and project suddenly into how things are now and recognize the enormous changes that have occurred. The TV is a good example of how things were and how things are now, but there have been so many changes it is like living in a totally different world, and that has happened over only 60 years or so.
Nothing can or will change whilst we accept the judicial system that we have today why?....because British law and its values have been destroyed in these corporate institutions, there is no justice and there are NO COURTS OF LAW where the truth is observed. How can there be any authorised courts when the crown was deposed of its authority according to British constitutional law in 2001?...obviously there cant....If you deny the constitution then you are insane to do so because it provides us all with the protections that we should be enjoying, instead we are all suffering under corporate rules which do NOT comply with the common laws and customs of the people (Treason).
Amchel Rothchild arrogantly stated over a century ago “give me the control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes their laws”...how fucking arrogant was that? And how true it is today!
Even back in the 1970's the police could be generally trusted to observe truth but not today...oh no! and we allow them to get away with ignoring the evidential facts of the crimes of the state and especially the high treason being so blatantly committed by imposters in Westminster, whom were NOT elected into service, they were appointed into power due to massive election frauds that the police have ignored and thus allowed...every single time!...how quickly we seem to forget!
Most people don't realize how important the British Constitution is sadly, without its protections we are all left naked to the tyranny, which is going to get a hell of a lot worse than it is now very soon.
You only need to do a cursory look into the UN's Agenda 21 ..20-30 to see the blatant plans that they have in store for you....forced vaccinations, microchipping, denied entry to the countryside, no right to private property etc, with inner city dwelling being built RIGHT NOW for the most subservient amongst us, who will be allowed to survive what is coming as slaves to the corporate tyranny....you wont be able to object then BTW. This “brave new world” will make George Orwells 1984 film look like a picnic in the park in comparison.
Whilst we all bicker like the insane idiots that we have become over frankly insignificant bullshit, or whilst we remain divided fighting the many arms of the beast instead of uniting to hit it at the heart of the matter, our natural born rights and freedoms are being slowly replaced with tyrannical policies designed to destroy us all, and our health is being purposefully declined drastically with so many toxins in our environment….our National anthem says “we shall never be slaves” but we already are slaves and most people don't even realize that fact or care.....bloody zombies everywhere!!
whilst you drink your aspartame soda, take flu vaccinations and other so called medicines which destroy the brains ability to function correctly, and whilst you watch your TV sets allowing yourself to be programmed daily and ignore the massive amounts of aluminium being sprayed into our atmosphere daily, try to think about why alzheimer's is being reported to be the futures biggest killer of people...THINK FFS!..if you still can.
If you think the global depopulation programme is a 'conspiracy theory' then I suggest you have already lost all reason and the ability to think straight...or to be able to do any logical research to discern the truth for yourself. That has become normal these days it seems.
If an entire population was gradually losing its ability to use logic and reason and was slowly going insane would we even notice? NO is the obvious answer because that is exactly what is going on!...yet we all think we are so bloody clever don't we?...well we aren't obviously!! or we would have realized by now that the ONLY remedy to this destruction of all that we hold dear is to unite in peace to demand the truth is observed by everyone...not just by those who are supposed to be in positions of service.
Ignorance is a choice these days and our ancient history proves undeniably that the only remedy to institutionalised corruption is unity of the people. The 'Glorious revolution' is a good example, and Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 was used successfully to put a stop the tyranny of the state back then. The people were not so insane 300 years ago, they took their liberty very seriously, it was not just the barons who revolted it was the general population also....please stop 'believing' all the bloody propaganda, Magna Carta was created by the feudal barons with the support of the people and, it evidently protects everyone equally....read it for yourself.
You may ask what we can do to reverse this situation?...what is the heart of the beast?.....as a recovering idiot myself I would say it is to demand the police observe the truth instead of ignoring it like the bloody traitors they are...they are the 'gatekeepers' keeping the perverted imposters safe from prosecution within properly convened courts of law....they are the front line of this war and the sooner we all wake up to that fact the sooner we can remedy the situation together. 200,000 policy enforcers and potentially millions of us........THINK ABOUT IT.
Why do you think the security clause (article 61 of Magna Carta 1215) was created? Which is not optional to abide by when it is in effect as it is today...it is because our ancestors were not so brain dead as we have all become...they knew through experience that unity of the people is the ONLY way to stop institutionalised corruption.
If you still argue that the 1215 Magna Carta is not a valid treaty then you are already too far gone so just crawl back under the proverbial rock you came from as you are just part of the problem and not the solution....you make me sick because the evidence clearly proves otherwise, and you choose to ignore the evidence and listen to the propaganda instead....
WE DID NOT CELEBRATE MAGNA CARTA IN 1216, NOR IN 1997, which according to the traitors amongst us replaced the 1215 version....THINK!....if it was null and void then why did Elizabeth II even bother to reply to the barons petition in 2001?...its not bloody rocket science is it!?......she gave the barons no choice but to invoke it by denying redress and allowing 'her criminal government' to ratify the treasonous treaty of Nice.....THINK!
In this day and age integrity sells for very little....honour has become almost obsolete and truth is the new lie.....we are insane to have allowed so much injustice to carry on and to make excuses as to why we cant stand by the truth in law urselves......anyone denying truth is an enemy of the people in these very dangerous times....mark my words!! if we don't unite in truth very soon, and take action to ensure the truth is observed, then we will lose everything including our lives and, if we cant unite in order to protect our children from psychopathic paedophiles then we deserve all that is evidently coming to us!...and more.
So that's my rant over for now...if I have offended you in any way then tough!! if the truth offends you then you are an idiot anyway so why should I care?......I've tried to be reasonable for years, I've been patient and active not just as a keyboard warrior but practically, to prove what I have said is true....I've created video's explaining the remedy, I've written a guide in laymans terms but most of you still sit there and do sod all....those of you who stood with me in Birmingham last November to lobby the police have my utmost respect and appreciation....50 out of 13,000 people in this group took part....a bloody disgrace to be blunt. We could take further action if only 10% of the group membership would stand by the truth in law but it seems most are content to watch others stick their neck on the block instead.....we could all be enjoying a peaceful system of service under our common law by now but most of you don't even promote article 61 at all....apathy has historically killed millions of innocent people in the past, Britain needs to grow a backbone or history will be repeated, you have been warned.

MARCH 2 2018 Visiter No.651850 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 1 2018 Visiter No.651812 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
DAVID MICHAEL GAUKE click to enlarge

link to actual email

MARCH 1 2018 Visiter No.651810 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 1 2018 Visiter No.651800 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MARCH 1 2018 Visiter No.651786 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

34 minutes in

FEBRUARY 28 2018 Visiter No.651762 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Fao UKColumn
Dear David
It all started a long time ago, over 20 years to be exact. Mum suffered an accident in 1995. In 1998 the acting Solicitors persuing damages where assessing my mothers needs over her life expectancy laid down at 83.
The claim was for 1.7 million in damages but over the course of the next 2 years divisions within the family would cause differences that would affect the claim. In short in 2001 the claim was settled by compromise at £775,000.
For 6 years prior to the award arriving I alone had looked after my mum whom was wheelchair bound and doubly incontinent. The award arrived and solicitors deemed mum was incapacitated to manage such large funds and me and mum disagreed.
Specialists were drafted in whom derrived mum had capacity but the court doctor disagreed and so the Judge opted to keep control of her money using a solicitor to manage it. The major concern from family was the charges.
The solicitor whom got the job expressed in writing that his charges will not be infringing upon the capitol designated for mum’s care using the words that, the family can “rest assured”. The Judge Denzil Anton Lush also in writing the judgement stated that awards for fees do not simply fall on a patient’s funds and in fact it is unlikely that charges would exceed what was estimated as laid down of £2000 per year.
The 1st year without any knowledge conveyed to mum or me his charges were £26,377 The second year without any knowledge again conveyed, his charges were £14,000 So, for the 1st 2 years we were told the estimated charges to be no more than £4,000 were in fact x 10 £40,377 This was discovered in the 3rd year. Whilst the deputy stole £500 per week he only gave mum n me £200 to live on. This is were sparks began to fly, as you can imagine.
We now are approaching nearly 2004 We came to the conclusion this court was very sinister indeed and it was not as was advertised. Various run in’s with this regime occurred and in 2008, so dissillusioned with the Uk we decided to emigrate to Spain in March 2008. No issues came from any party and we were free to go.
Having found a rental property in Spain demands were made to release mums remaining cash estate to her new country of residence which was refused. Not only did the court of protection for 'England and Wales' keep mums cash in their coffers, they failed to open a euro account for the country of residence with the balance. Protestations of many were made over 5 years to 2013 because on entering Spain the exchange rate was £1 to 1.5 euro but was diminishing to eventual parity of £1 to 1 euro over the years and so the allowances each month were becoming less and less due to exchange rate losses. We calculated over 5 years that the continued mal administration of mum’s cash estate had diminshed by exchange rate losses alone of over £100,000 The question was raised with our MP, that such mal adminstration losses need compensation to the client by the OPG who would not address the issue alongside the overcharges we had made countless complaints about & over 10 years the charges should have been £20,000 but were in fact £150,000. Basically, without a full assessment, in short, the OPG had a liability to their client in our opinion of a loss exceeding a quarter of a million pounds that as mum s sole carer could clearly see something was seriously wrong.
Though mum moved abroad 2008 and all her furniture went with her, the court prevented an exchange of her property to a Spanish villa not once, but twice, when we finally reduced the price to sell it the judge stopped it.
Numerous campaigns were addressed with nothing but contempt, so eventually in 2011 I went to see the British constitution group and met with Roger Hayes and Guy Taylor whom advised a commercial lien be served on the solicitors which was completed in December 2011 but as 2012 came in these solicitors that failed to respond to lien, were told that research on their properties was to follow in order to attach the debt to their houses. That’s when the shit it the fan, the solicitors shot to court with a case upon me for harassment that I denied consent to as I deemed it too BAR bias for a fair trial, jury demanded. They continued in my absence and finally in 2013 January they held a committal to prison hearing using their own judge, to judge in their own cause a nominated court of protection judge to issue a prison sentence upon me that fortunately me n mum had fled the country with the day before. Roger Hayes and GUY Taylor attempted to represent me in court and they served several documents on to the judge before he issued his void order.
5 Years later we still are fighting to have the order VOIDED meeting brick walls.
In a nut shell the court committed theft, fraud, mal administration upon mum topping it off with an act of treason, to imprison the whistleblower son/carer by judging in their own cause in an effort to protect the court of protection NOT the client whom has suffered not only £250,000 minimum losses but also her home too that has become jewdicially ringfenced in the UK where we can’t live in it peaceably and neither can she sell it.
We are trapped abroad renting a flat that is inadequate where in order to pay for it, I need to go out to work several hours per day instead of providing the care needed for my 77 yr old disabled mum whilst her £250,000 house stands in the UK, languishing and the court continues to ignore all attempts to bring the perpetraitors into a jury court of our own, denying all rights to due process.
You could'nt make it up if you tried.
Take into account this is a very brief shortened down version of the real nightmare that fortunately has been documented in diary format upon our website www.opg.me over the years inclusive of recorded conversations etc.
The worst part that revealed itself this last year 2017 is that they are still placing heavy charges upon that property that have been hidden/concealed, for so called services that also have been hidden & concealed!!!
Mike, mike@rake.net and Ann www.opg.me 07763906847

FEBRUARY 27 2018 Visiter No.651710 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 27 2018 Visiter No.651684 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 26 2018 Visiter No.651630 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 24 2018 Visiter No.651551 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Read the news paper article about it in the TELEGRAPH

FEBRUARY 23 2018 Visiter No.651502 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

video link
A State of Emergency is declared in the UK after the Justice System Collapses with the Restraint Fraud of an Equity Lawyer
2 Feb 2018: A State of Emergency is declared in the UK after the Justice System Collapsed at the Fraud Application to Commit (to prison) Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis as the 3 day hearing ended at 4pm today with a Restraining Order which carries 3 months in jail if breached. Dictatorship Governance cannot be the norm.
HHJ May made a perverse, predetermined, Permanent Restraining Order against Mr Ellis to stop Corruption Claims being filed in the High Court or go to jail for 3 months. The last minute "U" turn was contrary to the evidence presented at the one sided proceedings without any State injured party or State witnesses, giving evidence against Mr Ellis, who intends to appeal the Restraint Fraud on grounds of "No Jurisdiction" because Corruption jurisdiction is higher, there is an appeal pending in the Court of Appeal against the Order of Mr Justice Turner of 6th Nov 2017 and because the State was perversely acting as the Injured Party, the prosecutor, the judge as well as the jury.
The State has been proved to be unfit for purpose due to routine remedy denial frauds within the British Justice System, especially against whistleblowers and witnesses of State Crimes. Forty Corruption Claimants have exhausted domestic remedies in the most serious cases of State Terrorism and human trafficking in which Human Rights Campaigners are routinely persecuted with Benefit Denial Frauds, Ruin Frauds, Impoverishment Frauds to traffic children into the Child Abuse systems, steal property and subject parents to Mental health frauds to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act without any Mental Health Assessment in a "disappearance". State Money Laundering is facilitated within the Corruption Networks in which organised criminals, often convicted criminals, gain entry into public services during Community Service, over the evenings and weekends, with fake CV's and fake qualifications to deny liability claims to the people.
HHJ May refused to recuse herself despite evidence in a transcript of proceedings in which she gave costs to a solicitor Mr Sean McCormack who had perjured on the terms of a No Win No Fee Agreement in a conspiracy with the Law Society and the Solicitors Regulatory Authority, which was asked to investigate the fraud fees of £77,000 laundered by the Judge. 3 officers walked into Court 12 around 2pm with a set of handcuffs to try to intimidate a full public gallery. No journalists attended the entire 3 day hearing even though this is a pivotal case exposing UK Judicial Corruption.
Photo attached: Corruption Claimants with Mr Ellis (centre) outside RCJ in 2016
For Free Immediate Publication Globally
Send published articles and requests from further details to:-
Neelu Berry
3 Peel Drive

FEBRUARY 21 2018 Visiter No.651433 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
THERESA MAY by email tweet recorded & fax


FEBRUARY 20 2018 Visiter No.651360 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


FEBRUARY 19 2018 Visiter No.651358 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 16 2018 Visiter No.651193 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


FEBRUARY 15 2018 Visiter No.651186 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
due to lack of response by law

sent also by email... FAO MOJ CEO Susan Elizabeth Acland Hood Andrews You have failed to repond to an FOI request that you by law should have done by today, this being the 2nd one.

FEBRUARY 15 2018 Visiter No.651163 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 14 2018 Visiter No.651130 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 13 2018 Visiter No.651083 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

and our reply

FEBRUARY 12 2018 Visiter No.651041 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
CEO MoJ demonstrates its OK to BREAK LAW

EMAIL TO CEO MOJ SUSAN click below to enlarge

the knowledge that most of those who are the victims of wrong rulings have no effective means of redress. The civil non-family courts are only open to rich people (there is in effect no legal aid for civil claims now); and the family courts are filled with local authorities seeking to remove children from their parents, and disputes between couples in the middle of the pain – to them and their children – of partnership breakdown, and unable to obtain legal help to resolve these disputes.
The cause of this crisis is pretty clear – the justice system has endured austerity cuts from 2011 onwards more punishing than any other domestic delivery department. And the cuts are continuing pretty well unabated for the next two years. There will, by 2020, have been a 40% reduction in real terms of public expenditure by the Ministry of Justice – £10bn down to £6bn, with £600m still to go. And all this on the basis that the system expects the same standards as before – the same level of justice, the same numbers of people in jail or more, and the same non-custodial alternatives. The government has offered no leadership on how this is to be achieved.
The consequences of the crisis are profound. As Lord Judge, the former lord chief justice said, juries will increasingly not convict in serious cases. The public will have no confidence in the ability of the justice system to distinguish between the guilty and the innocent, and between the dangerous and the safe. The government will not be held to the law. Rights given to individuals by parliament are worthless to all save rich people who rarely need them to avoid injustice. Employers, the state, debtors – they can increasingly break the law unchallenged.
Nothing meaningful is going on within government to address this. There are internal Ministry of Justice (MoJ) reviews of Laspo, and the working of the Parole Board; and an internal Crown Prosecution Service review of whether the disclosure in all recent sex cases was adequate: but absolutely nothing to address the evident collapse of almost all parts of the system, and the underlying reasons.

FEBRUARY 5 2018 Visiter No.650800 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 5 2018 Visiter No.650796 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


FEBRUARY 5 2018 Visiter No.650792 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click to enlarge

FEBRUARY 5 2018 Visiter No.650775 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 1 2018 Visiter No.650683 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
By: Roger: Taylor
Pages 42-44, she refers to Dun & Bradstreet catalogue to show that UK Government is a corporation. Is this really a proof!? After all Dun & Bradstreet is a databank. Some source feeds particular information and a clerk at the company sorts out that information according to criteria and directive given by the management. It is not even legally binding in any court! I think this is a cheap attempt to establish a fact.
By virtue of this definition, Corporation just means an entity that is a LEGAL CONSTRUCT, not necessarily a business. PROFIT or NON-PROFIT nature of a CORPORATION does not have any bearing on its legal status and construction.
in the wake of the Gold Standard Amendment Act in 1931, the new Chancellor, Lord Snowden, made a clear distinction between His Majesty's Government and the newly-formed National Government, which was formed when the debts "arranged by His Majesty's government" and the Bank of England could not be repaid.
There was much criticism abroad of our Budget, our expenditure upon unemployment, our adverse balance of trade; these were all seized upon and exaggerated. To meet that situation the Bank of England about the beginning of August raised a very large credit, no less than £50,000,000, from the American and French central banks to meet the withdrawals, but within a couple of weeks these resources were practically exhausted. At that stage the National Government came into being, and the plans which we announced for balancing the Budget had the immediate effect of restoring confidence. For some days the stream of withdrawals fell sharply, and we hoped that it might dry up. Unfortunately, however, we could not present a united front.
a letter from the Bank of England, which Snowden quoted in the speech:
I am directed to state that the credits for $125,000,000 and francs 3,100,000,000, arranged by the Bank of England in New York and Paris respectively, are exhausted, and that the credit for $200,000,000 arranged in New York by His Majesty’s Government, together with credits for a total of francs 5 milliards negotiated in Paris, are practically exhausted also. The heavy demands for exchange on New York and Paris still continue. In addition, the Bank are being subjected to a drain of gold for Holland. Under these circumstances, the Bank consider that, having regard to the above commitments and to contingencies that may arise, it would be impossible for them to meet the demands for gold with which they would be faced on withdrawal of support from the New York and Paris exchanges. The Bank therefore feel it their duty to represent that in their opinion, it is expedient in the national interest that they should be relieved of their obligation to sell gold under the provisions of Section (1) Sub-section (2) of the Gold Standard Act, 1925. pursuant to the index of the Bankruptcy Act 1869, both Houses of Parliament, as well as the honourable members, were made subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws. the Crown, on the other hand, are not only indemnified against bankruptcy, the money that insolvents owe to it are not discharged in bankrupty.
it is my considered and widely researched opinion that the National Government was a corporate entity created to house the debts of the Crown, one it had merged its interests with the Bank of England. When it proved to be a self-evident truth that there was no way of continuing repayments, the Bank was relived of its obligations to redeem paper for gold and a fiat currency, backed by nothing except government securities (the future sweat equity of the people), was duly implemented.
Nothing, except the truth, is like it seems to be.
There is far more evidence than just Dunn & Bradstreet to show the UK as a Corporation and for those who couldn't care less if it is should think about the consequences of a Corporatocracy society which we have rather than a true 'Democracy' which dissappeared many years ago. Besides which any government are purely puppets of the real people in power anyway.
Yes, although actual evidence is difficult to find I think the circumstancial evidence of the UK being in Bankruptcy is quite damming. This evidence would include the 'Fiat' currency/ Monetary system that we have that since Gold was removed from society back in the 1930's when 'Promissory Notes' became 'LEGAL TENDER' not 'Lawful Tender'. The 1930's is quite significant especially if you read 'The Beast of Jekyl Island' which is more circumstancial evidence.
A Natural Man/Human Being with a living soul is 'Soveriegn' and subject to Soveriegn Law (Common Law). Corporations have 'Company Policy' which is enforced by Policy Officers and Courts de Facto. UK Company Policies are called Statutes which Policy Officers try to enforce on Soveriegns by way of contract. Governments had to invent something to make a soveriegn below them because governments were created by Natural Man so therefore should serve Natural Man who can easily un-create them. Therefore they created the 'Person' which they control and own. They just need us through their deceptions to accept we are a 'Person'.
There is ample info on this forum that covers Fleet Law, UCC etc which is being used to further enslave Natural Man/Woman.

JANUARY 31 2018 Visiter No.650641 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click either to enlarge

JANUARY 30 2018 Visiter No.650582 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Clearly my being rushed by ambulance into Spanish hospital on Saturday suffering dizzy spells, with blood pressure at levels not seen in the living I do relate to the above article after a campaign for justice lasting over 18 years.
Still clinging to life I will of course with my last breath do everything within my being to expose the sheer unadulterated 2 tier justice system, one for the rich and nothing for the poor.
My mother too has suffered from this ongoing COURT FRAUD that is obviously shortening her life span prediction by lack of the facilities that was awarded to her that has been witheld in order to gagg/silence the whistleblowing son/carer of over 20 years and imprison him for a crime that was concocted by JEWdicial masonic BAR criminals using PERSONAGE & BARRATRY, then adding insult to injury throwing salt in the wound, judging in their own cause to secure their goals.

JANUARY 29 2018 Visiter No.650570 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 28 2018 Visiter No.650548 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Why British Equity Law is Evil
by Anna von Reitz
I have been asked, "Why do I attack British Equity Law so vehemently?"
Here's the short answer--- It's not British and it's not Equity and it's not Law.
In the 1750's a great hue and cry began in England because of the arbitrary and unjust effects of imposing outdated written "one-size fits all" laws without consideration of mitigating circumstances.
For example, the sentence for murder is death.
But what about unintentional, accidental murder? What we now call "manslaughter"? And what about murder committed by children by accident? Or by the mentally incompetent, who couldn't possibly know what they were doing? How about murder in self-defense? The young woman being choked by a would-be rapist and thief, who finds a loaded gun and fires? Or crimes of passion? The betrayed husband who finds his wife in the arms of another man and snaps?
There was a good deal of well-founded discontent with the hoary and Draconian Common Law of England, which had ceased to be determined on a case by case basis as intended, and devolved--- especially in large cities, to a reliance on sentences established by the "case law". This over-reliance on the pure written law of record in similar cases (and who is to say what is "similar"?) and the gradual replacement of true jury trial by one's peers to judgment by rule and by whatever jury was summoned (quite often not actual peers of the accused) led to massive controversy about the true nature of justice and the ability of the Common Law to provide it.
Not, I think, coincidental to the times, the BBC is advertising a series called, "Garrow's Law" which is supposedly based on actual cases tried by William Garrow, a young Barrister who stood on the forefront of this entire movement to bring a more considered and considerate justice into the courts, and the development of a system of law that could see beyond the black and white words on a page clearly stating things like, "the sentence for murder is death by hanging...." (no matter what).
Sounds wonderful, doesn't it? A better law.....a more just law....a more considerate law....a more fair law.....
But, unfortunately, just as the pendulum moved in the 1750's to create the shades of grey we all now know and agree to be just, such as the provisions for manslaughter and juvenile court, the same forward and redeeming motion carried too far in the other direction, muddying the virtuous and sure, if sometimes dreadful and Puritanical English Common Law with international Admiralty Law, to create British Equity Law.
The primary proponent of this "mocking marriage" of English Common Law with Admiralty Law was Lord Mansfield, a former Scottish Admiralty Attorney who rose to favor and crafted the basis of British Equity Law in the years immediately before the American Revolution.
The problem with British Equity Law is that is allows the judge to sit in place of the King, which displaces the traditional place and power of the Jury of One's Peers.
Suddenly, a Barrister is King.... He can use "his discretion" to inflict the harshest sentence available under the written law, or he can soften the sentence as he sees fit, or dismiss the case entirely. Just like the King of England might.
Of course, this power is entirely seductive to the members of the Bar Association, and, as it turns out, seductive for the King as well: his minions can use their discretion to benefit him and his friends and the ruling class in general, and if by chance they go too far in their toady behavior, he, the King, can emerge as the savior from these abuses, his hands immaculately clean.
So the idealists who sought to create a more perfect justice than the English Common Law provided, wound up creating something that was more varied, more precise, more mutable---more "sophisticated" in the bad sense of that word, but also far more prone to manipulation, abuse, and the currying of favor.
Also, it must be said, that this new Equity Law totally violated another safeguard provided to individual people by the honestly executed Common Law--- judgment by one's own peers.
England then as now is a culture dominated by culture. A man does not have to speak to be known in England. Who and what he is, his education, his social station is worn like an armband or -- famously--- a "funny hat". So the tradition of trial by jury of one's peers is a literal reflection of the fact that different strata of society have different standards, different knowledge, and different values.
What is justice to a chimney sweep or a fisherman is not necessarily the same as the justice of a lord----or, and this is my point entirely---- a barrister.
What one man regards as gross impropriety is commonplace to another. So those of the same social class and profession and nation are unavoidably the "peers" that can most rightly judge the actions of another of their brethren.
And, ultimately, this tradition of judgment by peers also yields the most accurate judges of the law itself, by testing a law against all social strata, all professions, all religions, all races---- to judge if it is truly fair and right in all their many eyes.
When a jury of one's true peers is replaced by a judge, the power and purpose of jury nullification is also lost. The Common Law of England and the Common Law of America both provide(d) for the additional safeguard of jury nullification. Quite aside from judging the particulars of an individual case, true common law juries can judge the law itself, and if they find it unfair, unreasonable, or unjust--- they can throw it out.
The legislature does not rule the people it serves, so long as the people have access to the power of jury nullification.
This safeguard of the Common Law prevents oppressive, insane, arbitrary, or unfair laws from standing on the books and plaguing entire generations of people.
So from the standpoint of preventing abuse of power by judges exercising their "personal discretion" for personal or social gain, and from the standpoint of ensuring that people are judged by their peers and not by someone alien to the realities of their lives, and from the standpoint of truly refining the law itself--- the Common Law stands superior in every respect, despite the occasions when Equity Law has provided true equity and justice via the good heart and wisdom of individual judges.
With a clear insight now into the ways and means used by the British Territorial United States of America subsidiary to gain secretive control of American land and labor assets, and to also insinuate British Equity Law on American soil, it is thunderously apparent how "Equity Law" has been used to oppress the people and gild the "kings"---- those in Westminster and in Congress.
If the object of law is justice and order, then Equity Law is the open door to feudalism, class strife, cronyism, and ultimately---though not in every case---- injustice, because by adopting British Equity Law, we adopt coercive power and place it in the hands of one man or woman, operating only according to his or her "discretion" --- which ultimately too often means "what I can get away with".
It also leads to a perverse rewards system, in which those judges who make the most money for the court get the richest pensions and favors, and who are preened and petted for the choicest professional favors. He who feeds the king---whoever and whatever the "king" may be--- gets fed in return, so in such a system, the natural affinities a man might have for justice too often get set aside in favor of his new vacation home, a college education for his grandson, or a new job promotion for his wife.
The justice provided by one man can be bought or sold; it is only a question of --- at what price? Therein lies another potent reason that British Equity Law fails the cause of justice--- it's relatively easy to buy, bully, or kill one man, but the bulwark of a thousand years of Common Law? That is not so easily swayed!
Also, finally, and this is most telling, too---- without Jury Nullification doing its after-the-fact pruning and proving of the Legislature's work, laws proliferate like dandelions in spring.
It seems to be a universal plague of nature that men who are elected to the legislature think that it is their business to pass laws for other men to live by, and if at least ten such mandates do not carry their names and approvals each session, they think they aren't doing their jobs.
I did a random study here in Alaska some years ago and found that the legislature was passing between two and three hundred new laws per year.....3000 new laws, give or take, per decade.
What, ho? Are we really creating so many brand new point sources of evil and mayhem that it takes 200-300 new laws every year to keep things in order? And who is going to learn all these new laws? And who is going to pay for their enforcement?
Without the operation of Jury Nullification operating in the background, these laws just burgeon and accumulate, like a cancer growing in the dark. This is why at last count, the federal government and its agencies were busy trying to enforce 80 million laws.
Think about it. Seriously. Eighty million laws.
This is yet another dangerous and undesirable result of adopting British Equity Law and allowing it to run rampant on our shores. It denies jury nullification and results in this unbridled growth and proliferation of laws that simply stay on the books and appear to breed ten new volumes every year.
Somebody has to pay for enforcing all those laws, and plainly, it has already reached the point where any attempt at fair, competent, and universal application of such laws is impossible. Nobody has the ability to know and obey 80 million laws, so they are (a) meaningless or (b) arbitrarily and sporadically enforced, which gives rise to more injustice and more police incompetence and other social evils and costs too numerous to contemplate.
I once estimated that if the current Alaska legislature did nothing but review and repeal laws already on the books, it would take them ten years to arrive at a reasonable number of laws that could be provided a reasonable amount of enforcement. Ten years of legislative sessions, just to clean up the mess that would have been taken care of by jury nullification otherwise?
Prone to corruption and difficult to correct is a recipe for failure no matter what idealistic goals might otherwise be espoused, and all that is quite aside from the fact that the American people are owed the American Common Law.
American Common Law, unlike its British Cousin, didn't suffer the disadvantages of the British Equity system. At worst, it was simply elbowed out of the way and left in relative disuse by the quiet, improper proliferation of British courts on our shores.
Wrapping up with my first comment-- it's not British, it's not Equity, and it's not Law---
British Equity Law isn't British in the same way that a mixed breed dog is neither this breed nor that; the English Common Law is what it is, but Admiralty Law comes from the far corners of the Earth, an ancient amalgam that belongs everywhere and nowhere, with roots in the trading practices of Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt, Mycenae, Crete, Africa, India, China.....
It isn't equitable, either. What is equitable about men submitting themselves "in trust" to another man who is not impartial, not likely to be their peer, and who has profit motive to sheer them both?
And as for being Law--- Law is based on timeless religious and ethical principles, not the opinions and individual pet peeves and petty concerns of men caught up in the exercise of their own spleens and the commerce of political power.
So, no, it's not British. It's not Equity. And it most certainly is not Law.
This is the kind of leadership required

JANUARY 28 2018 Visiter No.650543 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 26 2018 Visiter No.650512 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 25 2018 Visiter No.650488 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 19 2018 visitor No.650312 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 18 2018 visitor No.650290 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 13 2018 visitor No.650174 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
11 page PDF filed to IPCC APPEAL

JANUARY 13 2018 visitor No.650168 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 10 2018 visitor No.650095 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
The one action we must absolutely positively do, and to which all others are entirely ignoring in their so-called process (which is why their processes are not working or getting people thrown in jail), is to be BORN AGAIN into the digital record!!!!!!
It is this, ladies and gentlemen, or the lack thereof, that is the reason we are getting NOWHERE, and the exact reason why these criminal banks and BAR attorneys continue to exploit and enslave the population !!!!
They have stolen, by unlawful conversion, access rights to our digital record, by forgery and fabrication, to the gaining of immense wealth, at the express expense of you and I.
If people would get off all this legal shit and concentrate and business models in patent, we could crush these sons of bitches in nothing flat. but this is not happening because people have chosen to ignore the very one thing that drives all of this
THIS IS WHAT DRIVES THEIR CONTINUING ACTS AGAINST THE GOOD PEOPLE OF THIS WORLD and they are doing so by our own incompetence and ignorance of sophisticated business practices that are not ordinary course, which they have intentionally concealed from the world through public fabrication and deception, that everything is honky Dory ordinary course. So all these do-gooders who claim they know what is going on, in fact do not now shit, and are further leading people away from the actual facts and truths instead of towards and into the actual things we need to be dealing

JANUARY 9 2018 visitor No.650071 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

What, or whom is the Crown?
What is the City of London?
What is the DOG. LATIN. (all-caps) UNITED KINGDOM LTD?
Have you ever wondered why the SURNAME and other important text is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT?
Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud.
See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and the ‘surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power.
The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And the Corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate - Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you.
Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT.
This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin'
The main place this ALL UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language. Further going onto say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seam to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford.
Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts.
If you take a second to analyse any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving licence, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realise that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPERCASE.
Soon you will realise that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless.
Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation it can only impose fines and acts, upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies.
This is a crime known as “personage”.
Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily.
The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages?

JANUARY 7 2018 visitor No.650012 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 7 2018 visitor No.650009 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 6 2018 visitor No.650000 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JANUARY 5 2018 visitor No.649900 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

January 4 2018 visitor No.649875 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

LINK to letter

DECEMBER 31 2017 visitor No.649850 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 29 2017 visitor No.649760 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 25 2017 visitor No.649660 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

FOR AND ON THE RECORD I'm not a freeman, i'm free born, i'm not a citizen, because i'm not a member of any society, because i never joined of my own free will, i'm not a PERSON, because i bleed and fictions don't, i'm not Governed, because i don't register to vote, I'm not a slave, because i wont let equals abuse my rights, i'm not a Truther, i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm just me who are you ?

DECEMBER 24 2017 visitor No.649650 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 21 2017 visitor No.649572 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 21 2017 visitor No.649570 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 20 2017 visitor No.649556 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 18 2017 visitor No.649516 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 16 2017 visitor No.649483 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
LINK to NoticeofRescissionofSignatures.pdf

DECEMBER 15 2017 visitor No.649460 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond. AUTOTRIS CUSIP DTCC
What they’re doing in these courts is all about Bonds. When you go into the courtroom after you’re arrested, they use two different sets of Bonds. What they do when your arrested they fill out a “Bid Bond”. The United States District Court uses 273, 274 & 275. SF = “Standard Form”. Standard Form 273, Standard Form 274 & Standard Form 275. This is the United States District Court.
There is another set of Bonds and they are all put out by GSA = General Services Administration. I’m just talking off the top of my head because I have all of this stuff memorized. GSA Form SF24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond” is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A and put out by the GSA.
O.K. So, what are they doing with these Bonds? What’s going on in the courtroom is that they are suing you for a debt collection. If you look at these Bonds, everyone of these Bonds: the “Bid Bond”, the “Performance Bond” & the “Payment Bond”, all have a “PENAL SUM” attached to it. The reason for the “Penal Sum” is if you don’t pay the Debt, you go into “Default Judgment”.
That is what is going on in the courtroom. That is why all of these guys are sitting in prison wondering what’s going on! If you go in and argue jurisdiction or refuse to answer questions that the judge or the court addresses to you, they will find you in contempt of court and they will put you in jail. What they do is arrest you, then they hold you, basically until the suit has been completed. Once they get “Default Judgment” on you because of your failure to pay the Debt, they put you in prison. Theattorneys are there to create a smoke screen.
What attorneys have been trained to do is to lead you into “Dishonor” or “Default Judgment”. Then the court puts you into prison then they sell your “Default Judgment”.
Who do they sell it to?
Believe it or not, the U.S. District Court buys all of these State Court Judgments. I don’t know why noone has found this out before. There are about 300 “re-insurance” companies that buy these bonds. They are all ‘insurance” companies. These are the people that are buying these Bonds when you went into “Default Judgment” and they cannot buy these Bonds unless they are Certified by the Secretary of the Treasury.
What are they doing with these Bonds? They have regulations governing these Bonds – there are 2,000 regulations governing these Bonds.
Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments - anything you put your signature on is a Negotiable Instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code which is the Lex Mercantorium. Its Mercantile Civil Law.
The reason they use Lex Merchantorium in the court room is because everyone of you are Merchant’s at Law and Merchants at Law is anyone who holds themselves out to be an expert.Because you use commercial paper on a daily basis, you are considered to be an ‘expert’. This is also why they are not telling you what is really going on in the courtroom. You are presumed to know this stuff because you hold yourself out to be an expert by using commercial paper every day.
Every time you put your signature on a piece of paper, you are creating a Negotiable Instrument. Some are Non-Negotiable and some are Negotiable. Every time you endorse something, you are acting as an accommodation party or an accommodation maker under UCC 3-419.
An accommodation party is anyone who loans their signature to another party. Read UCC 3-419, it tells you what an accommodation maker is and what an accommodation party is. When you loan your signature to them, they can then re-write your signature on any document they want and that’s exactly what they are doing.
What the Federal Courts are doing is they are buying up these state court default judgments, called ‘criminal cases’ to cover up what they are doing. Actually, they are civil cases.
If you read “Clerk’s Praxis”, you find that what they call ‘criminal’ is all civil, they just call it criminal to cover up what their doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison, bottom line.
How many of you have heard of REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust or PZN which means Prison Trust? Prisoners are real estate? They own all the real estate because they hold the Bonds on them. You haven’t redeemed your Bond, so they didn’t close your account.
Here’s what goes on: A contractor comes in or any corporation could come in and tender a Bid Bond to the US District Court and they buy up these court judgments and anytime you issue a Bid Bond there has to be a reinsure. So they get a Reinsurance Company to come in and act as Surety for the Bid Bond, then they bring in a Performance Bond. All of these Bonds; Bid, Payment & Performance are all Surety Bonds and anytime you issue a Bid Bond it has to have a Surety guaranteeing or reinsuring the Bid Bond via issuing a Performance Bond.
Then they get an underwriter and that would be either an Investment Broker or an Investment Banker. They come in and underwrite the Performance Bond which is reinsuring the Bid Bond.
What does the underwriter do with the Performance Bond? The underwriter takes the 3 Bonds and pools them and creates what is known as Mortgaged Backed Securities. When you pool these MBS, they are called BONDS and are sold to a company called TBA, which is the Bond Market Association - this is an actual Corporation.
These converted Bonds, now MBS’ are investment securities and being sold the international level. CCA is one of the tickers on the NY Stock Exchange. Others include; CWX, CWD & CWG. When it goes to Frankfurt = CWG, when it goes to Berlin = CWD and so on.
Remember, everything is commercial. 7211 7 CFR says that all crimes are commercial. If you read that carefully it says kidnapping, robbery, extortion, murder, etc. are all commercial crimes. Thus, you are funding the whole enchilada simply because you got into Default Judgment when you went into court and failed to redeem the Bond.
This is why people don’t win in court; cause they don’t redeem the Bond. You are the Principal upon which all money circulates, but you don’t want to start arguing with the court about that.
They are drafting you for performance. So, anytime the court asks you to do something they are drafting you for performance and if you don’t perform, you get into dishonor by non acceptance.They are making a formal presentment under 3-501 of the UCC so they can charge you and they USE the word “charge”. They use the same commercial words on your Indictment, Information and Complaint. They use the word “charge”, i.e., “the following charges”, “…he has two counts of charges”, etc.
Be as gentle as a dove and wise as a serpent. You can’t act like an insurgent or belligerent. If you do, they will treat you like one; they’ll beat you up.
What you want to do is settle the account…go to full settlement and closure; you’re running the account, you’re the Fiduciary Trustee over the account – tell them what to do. You’re the Principal and owner of the account, tell them what to do – tell them you want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go.
In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond.
Here is where to begin: Start with what we call a conditional acceptance.
With the conditional acceptance you can say: “I’m more than happy to give you my name, if you can show that charging papers have been put into the court record. I have not seen any papers that show any charges exist.”
That’s a “Negative Averment”. What you are doing is rebutting the presumption that they have charges against you. They work off presumptions. They don’t have to have anything. You must rebut their presumptions.
I went down there and asked them for the Bid Bond. I said I want the Bid Bond back. I asked for full settlement and closure of the account. It’s your money that they create and the same thing is going on in the Banks and with these Bonds - they monetize these Bonds.
Then ask for legal counsel. The reason why you have to have an attorney, and I cannot emphasize this too strongly, is because the attorney while in a courtroom is they are working on the public side and you are working on the private side. The court cannot talk to you except through your attorney. You need a mouth piece; a microphone. That is what attorneys are - a mouthpiece. Everyone on the Public side is insolvent and bankrupt. You are not.
This is situation is called a Fiction-of-Law. They will not allow you to defeat this “Fiction-Of-Law”. Why? In Admiralty Maritime Law everything is colorable. It has the appearance of being real but is not real.
They will appoint legal counsel for you. You then instruct the attorney that you are doing a “LETTER OF ROGATORY” or letter of advice. This is also called an “Acceptance for Honor” and you want an accounting of what the total amount of the Bill is post settlement and closure of this account.
Then you give your CUSIP and AUTOTIS number and your case number.
Here’s the wording you use: “I accept your charge(s) for Value and Consideration in return for Post Settlement and Closure of Case # , account# 123-45-6789 [put down your 9 digit social security number] and put down CUSIP# [your ssn] & AUTOTRIS# [your ssn w/o dashes]. Please us my exemption for full settlement and closure of this account as this account is prepaid and exempt from levy. (Date it and endorse it as the Authorized Representative.)
(AUTOTRIS means Automated Tracking Identification System. This is the same as your social security number without the dashes. When I said that they didn’t even want to talk to me…when you sayCUSIP & AUTOTRIS they know exactly what you’re talking about. CUSIP is The COMMITTEE ON UNIFORM SECURITIES IDENTIFICATION PROCESSES. . CUSIP uses your Social Security Number to identify you because the Birth Certificate is a Security. It is an investment security and they have all the original Birth Certificates which are registered at the State level with the Department of Human Recourses and then they go to the Department of Commerce and the Federal level and then to the DTC (Depository Trust Corporation).
Judges and lawyers don’t understand commercial law. They do not teach commercial law at law school.They have a special school for them and it’s on a “need to know” basis. The law always assumes that you know, since you were doing this since you were born until you reach the age of accountability, which is 18 years of age or what they call adulthood. If your holding yourself out and using commercial paper on a daily basis, that legal definition makes you an expert or you wouldn’t be using it, so they presume that when you go into the courtroom you know all this stuff.
They have to give you an out. Whenever you create a liability, you always have to create a remedy. They’re on the Public side of the accounting ledger. You are on the Private side.
You have an account and your account is a “Demand Deposit” account and you are insured by the FDIA and the FDIC. The “Federal Depository Insurance Act” which insures the FDIC which is the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation under Title 12; they have a $10 Million Dollar Policy on you and YOU’RE WORTH MORE DEAD THAN YOU ARE ALIVE.
NOTE: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.
Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.
The public is encouraged to purchase all kinds of insurance protection when the TRUST actually pays for all physical damages; medical costs; new technology and death benefits. The hype to purchase insurance is a ploy to keep us in poverty and profit off our stupidity because the Vatican owns the controlling interest in all Insurance Companies.
You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST. Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time. Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them. If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it? A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due. Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these Cesta Que Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature.


DECEMBER 15 2017 visitor No.649455 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 14 2017 visitor No.649434 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
by Maurice Kellett
Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven
- Christ in Luke 6:37
Police will willingly protect corrupt judges. Corrupt solicitors and barristers abound. This is the true state of the present UK justice system. When people don’t stand up against corrupt judges and policemen that is the most dangerous part of it. They gain more confidence to carry on with yet more evil acts against innocent victims. On web site http://www.mason-rule.com there is part of the evidence to show what happens when a judicial and police victim stands up and defies their evil. These people have nothing to do with justice whatsoever. They are criminals covering under the umbrella of alleged justice. They are amongst the very reasons why terrorism exists. It will exist just so long as they exist. Under the New World Order, which is now underway, more of the worlds downtrodden will turn more to terrorism. World leaders will condemn terrorism but will continue to ignore the reasons that terrorists exist. Just so long as the general public are led by evil people the outcome will itself be evil. I don’t condone terrorism but I can say that I know one of the main reasons of why it exists. There are many hypocrites within British authority, those same hypocrites help to make sure that those with similar tendencies will always remain in the chain of authority.
In 1986 I was battered and then struck by a car that was deliberately driven at me after I had uncovered corruption at then British Coal Estates Department.. The court proceedings at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear were illegal. The single magistrate who on sat on the matter was not qualified to act alone. There were in fact two magistrates sitting on the bench but he was a close friend of the man who had battered me and the struck me with the car he deliberately had driven at me. It would have been against court rules for him to have sat on the case in these circumstances. When I raised that matter , even though he sat on the bench, he claimed that he had stood down. Magistrates generally have a few days notice of cases coming before them so they can withdraw from the proceedings in cases such as this. The Clerk to the Justices of Houghton Magistrates Court, along with the Lord Chancellors Department were party to the cover up of those illegal proceedings. After years of trying to have the matter brought to true justice the reaction of authority has been to give me more trouble by continued corruption so rife amongst their ranks. I have recently made a claim for damages against Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court and demanded a full inquiry into my case and into others to see if I was the courts only victim since 1986 or whether there were others. I have also formally refused to accept the jurisdiction of that court until such Inquiry is set up. The new Clerk to the Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court has not replied to my Statement of Truth setting down the facts of 1986 and the years following it. I delivered that statement to the court several weeks before Christmas. I can only arrive at one conclusion. Northumbria Police have promised over the past few years to investigate the matter of the courts illegal proceedings. But that has been nothing short of a smokescreen set up while they have plotted yet further acts of corruption against me. Even the Crown Prosecution Service situated at Washington, Tyne-Wear attempted to blackmail me. The Northumbria Police Authority have failed to answer a letter I sent to them several months ago asking what Northumbria Police were doing in regard to my allegations of bent judges Durham Constabulary have also failed to act on the matter. of bent judges at the Durham County Court. There is also the matter of perjury that was used against me.
Member of Parliament Mr Fraser Kemp has known about my allegations for several years. Previously he had passed me on to former MEP Alan Donnely. Alan Donnely then informed me that what was being done to me was nothing to do with him and he would not act. Only now after a further approach to him, has MP Fraser Kemp referred my case to the RT Hon. Baroness Scotland QC Parliamentary Secretary to the Lord Chancellors Department. He has also referred my case to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. That was several weeks ago but to date nothing further has been heard from Mr Kemp.
Durham Constabulary have falsely alleged that when a judge lies it is a judicial decision and is therefore protected. That is in fact a lie. A judge who decides to lie and use fraud to arrive at his or her judgement is not protected other than by bent policemen. Such a judge is a criminal by reason of such acts.
To date the mob I mention above, for that is what they are, have cost me my thirty year marriage and the death of my father. They have also caused me other severe damage. With the assistance of bent judges operating within the North East Court Circuit they engineered my bankruptcy. It was two days later that my father collapsed and died after my alleged bankruptcy was published on the front page of the Sunderland Echo newspaper. He had been extremely upset at what was being done to me and begged me to give up my fight against our corrupt justice system because he said that ultimately it would kill me.. My conscience would never allow me to do that. It was the damages awarded by a criminal judge named on http://www.mason-rule.comwho is still being protected by both Durham and Northumbria Police which allowed my alleged bankruptcy. The proceedings before that judge were also illegal and he used considerable fraud as a means to arrive at his judgement. He also allowed my civil law opponent the use of very material perjury. Some of the evidence of that fraud etc. is published on http://www.mason-rule.com It is known that several police forces are monitoring this website. These scum operating within the UK justice system have made my life so bad that I am no longer afraid of death so I am no longer afraid of them.
"And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell-fire."
- Christ in Matthew 10:28
By means of their corrupt practices, they have provided me with evidence of what they are capable of doing to people such as myself. I am using that evidence. And providing it to others. I will never give up until these people are brought to trial. Prime Minister Tony Blair promised us a fairer Britain. Britain is less fair now than I can remember in the fifty eight years of my life. We remain the laughing stock of other countries who have what can be called a credible justice system. I think it is now time for judges to be elected as in the North American system. The old boys network, often with Masonic membership or leanings, who are responsible for the employment of judges. That must be brought to a halt as soon as possible. People holding public office must be made to declare any membership of any secret society as a first step to trying to achieve something resembling a true justice system.
I can no longer rely on the police for protection. A visit to http://www.mason-rule.com will give the reason for this. I cannot rely on the courts either for justice but that has been the situation for a long time now. Bent judges don’t like being exposed. Straight judges don’t like bent judges being exposed either. My life has been threatened and a threat was also made to burn my home down unless I stopped publicising judicial and police corruption much of which has its roots in Freemasonry. Northumbria Police simply did not want to know about that. Neither did they want to know about a man who threatened that my wife, daughters and I were to be stabbed. He even repeated that threat to a Northumbria Police officer who took no action on it. When we heard evidence that the threat to burn down our home was probably real, my wife begged me to sell our home and run. I could not do that so she went and there effectively ended my thirty year marriage.
In the name of God Almighty all I ask is that the general public wake up to what is going on. My health is now such that my efforts to publicise the situation, even if I eventually get justice, will not help me much. I have concluded that what I am doing may well cost me my life but what is a life when it has been made pure pain and suffering at the hands of the corrupt justice establishment? It is a sad reflection when Tony Blair has recently been preaching at home and abroad on the matter of justice when Britain remains second only to Turkey for the abuse of human rights.
Maurice Kellett
16A The Lyons,
Tyne-Wear DH5 0HT.
e-mail: maurice.kellett@ntlworld.com

DECEMBER 14 2017 visitor No.649431 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Dear Sirs
I refer to a SAR [subject access request] that was made twice to POLICE
The second date was recorded as delivered on August 3rd 2017
FAO Police MARK ALDRIDGE DC2082 02082017.pdf
This matter has now been reported to the ICO information commissioners office.
On the 13 December 2017
Case Reference Number RFA0716005
Dear Mr Clarke
Thank you for the further concern raised to us in relation to Lancashire Police’s handling of your personal data.
A new case has been raised to consider this matter under reference RFA0716005. We deal with cases in date order and once your case has been considered we will contact you to advise of next steps.
In the meantime, if you have any additional information which you would like us to consider, please forward it on to the case quoting the above reference number.
Thank you for your patience in this matter and we shall be in touch shortly.
Yours sincerely
Caroline Flint
Lead Case Officer
01625 545 258

DECEMBER 13 2017 visitor No.649396 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click to enlarge

DECEMBER 13 2017 visitor No.649390 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click here for details

DECEMBER 12 2017 visitor No.649372 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click here to enlarge the 3 page pdf

DECEMBER 12 2017 visitor No.649370 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
A 2 PAGE PDF HERE click to enlarge

DECEMBER 10 2017 visitor No.649323 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Published on 25 Oct 2014
Sabine K McNeill, the indefatigable campaigner, and group of a couple of dozen affected family members visit the European Parliament to expose the malfeasance and criminality of the British Government. Child Stealing By The State or Forced Adoptions are crime's against Humanity. Genocide is being carried out today in Britain.

DECEMBER 9 2017 visitor No.649281 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 8 2017 visitor No.649270 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 8 2017 visitor No.649250 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DECEMBER 6 2017 visitor No.649200 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Now this is cooking with gas baby !!!!
Initial Court Appearance.
Memorize this just in case, and keep a copy with you wherever you go. Give them your full Name Upper and Lower Case (no initials), if you play he Name Game they may try to say you didn’t’ “appear” and hit you with a warrant. Then…
1. Before we proceed, I need to ask the judge: Will the plaintiff (or prosecutor) certify my right of subrogation (in writing please)? You are saying here is that you are surety for the case, and you have the highest claim and now own the case and bond the prosecution had to put up. Then you can make an offer to have them offset the debt of the case. All cases are a “charge” – this request for certification cannot be refused.
2. …if they do not comply and try to move forward say: I do not consent to these proceedings.
3. Your offer is not accepted. (If you already appeared an entered a plea - consider adding this: I withdraw any previous appearances and agreement entered under duress).
4. I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings. I believe I do have a right to subrogation being denied, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward, so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.
Always be ready for some push back or avoidance, but go back to these 4 main points above, and tell them we cannot proceed until these issues are addressed. It may not be fatal to do this later, but at the earliest possible time get this on the record. The judge WILL likely try to move on to other proceedings or get you engaged in other things or issues, so be ready for them to distract and dissuade you. Get these items resolved and stay on point to close the deal in a few moments. If you did take an attorney, tell them you intend to write a letter privately to the judge and ask the same.
Subrogation – Very important concept to understand as all court cases are really commercial transactions and making a claim to your securities because you failed to.
What is SUBROGATION? http://thelawdictionary.org/subrogation
The substitution of one thing for another, or of one person into the place of another with respect to rights, claims, or securities. Subrogation denotes the putting a third person who has paid a debt in the place of the creditor to whom he has paid it, so as that he may exercise against the debtor all SUBROGATION 1117 SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES the rights which the creditor, if unpaid, might have done. Brown. The equity by which a person who is secondarily liable for a debt, and has paid it, is put in the place of the creditor, so as to entitle to make use of all the securities and remedies possessed by the creditor, in order to enforce the right of exoneration as against the principal debtor, or of contribution against others who are liable in the same rank as himself. Bisp. Eq.
The substitution of one person in the place of another with reference to a lawful claim, demand, or right, so that he or she who is substituted succeeds to the rights of the other in relation to the debt or claim, and its rights, remedies, or Securities.
There are two types of subrogation: legal and conventional. Legal subrogation arises by operation of law, whereas conventional subrogation is a result of a contract.
The purpose of subrogation is to compel the ultimate payment of a debt by the party who, in Equity and good conscience, should pay it. This subrogation is an equitable device used to avoid injustice.
Legal subrogation takes place as a matter of equity, with or without an agreement. The right of legal subrogation can be either modified or extinguished through a contractual agreement. It cannot be used to displace a contract agreed upon by the parties. Conventional subrogation arises when one individual satisfies the debt of another as a result of a contractual agreement that provides that any claims or liens that exist as security for the debt be kept alive for the benefit of the party who pays the debt. It is necessary that the agreement be supported by consideration; however, it does not have to be in writing and can be either express or implied.
(COMMENT: this is what you get yourself into in court)
The facts of each case determine the issue of whether or not subrogation is applicable. In general, the remedy is broad enough to include every instance in which one party, who is not a mere volunteer, pays a debt for which a second party is primarily liable and which, in equity and good conscience, should have been discharged by the second party. Subrogation is a highly favored remedy that the courts are inclined to extend and apply liberally.
The ordinary equity maxims are applicable to subrogation, which is not permitted when there is an adequate legal remedy. The plaintiff must come into court with clean hands, and the person who seeks equity must do equity. The remedy is not available when there are equal or superior equities in other individuals who are in opposition to the party seeking subrogation. The remedy is denied when the person seeking subrogation has interfered with the rights of others, committed Fraud, or been negligent.
The right to subrogation accrues upon payment of the debt. The subrogee is generally entitled to all the creditor's rights, privileges, priorities, remedies, and judgments and is subject only to whatever limitations and conditions were binding on the creditor. He does not, however, have any more extensive rights than the creditor.
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
COMMENT: This applies directly to any court “charge”, you have the highest equitable claim to matter involving your NAME estate, so asking the plaintiff/prosecutor to certify your right to subrogation is the right move. Keep it THIS simple. This turn the tables, makes you plaintiff, and order them to settle the accounts (or you should order them after you ask). This has been tested live in court and is quite effective if you follow through. Optional idea - one MAY be able to write a private letter to the judge as well simply asking: Will the plaintiff (or prosecutor) certify my right of subrogation (do so in writing please)? If you already have an attorney show him what you plan to send to the judge (he’ll likely run form this and discourage you, as it exposed the game they are all playing), then send a letter privately from you to the judge in chambers, signed as the living soul (LS). Do not let them stop you from exercising this right to your right of subrogation.

DECEMBER 4 2017 visitor No.649150 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Step by Step -- What You've All Been Screaming For -- Part One
There have been so many piteous outcries coming in from people who are totally confused or partially befuddled that I have once again faced the necessity of sitting down at my computer and.....
Step 1: Sit down and look at your "Birth Certificate" and understand what it is and how it functions.
It has two basic functions. First, it is an Insurance Indemnity Receipt which is required under the Lieber Code/Hague Conventions. They have to give you an indemnity receipt for the property they are stealing from you--- essentially an insurance policy guaranteeing that your property won't be harmed as a result of their use of it.
This makes you the "Subrogee" --- the Insured Party and Priority Creditor of your own ESTATE holdings. This process of "registration" (as opposed to "recording") creates a separate PERSON named after your Given Trade Name, yet owned and operated by a franchise of the MUNICIPAL UNITED STATES--- the separate government of Washington, DC, operated as an international city-state by the members o Congress.
When you get your BC "Authenticated" by the United States of America State Department you find out for sure which federal corporation is issuing the BIRTH CERTIFICATE you have been issued. In most cases it will be a STATE OF STATE, like THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, but in some cases will be a federal department, such as THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
Second, the Birth Certificate is a Bond---literally. It is a bond issued against the value of the ESTATE (or more recently, Public Transmitting Utility) assets that belong to you. A bond is an I.O.U. --- a promise to pay under stipulated conditions. You have the certificate proving that you are the actual owner of the assets being bonded, but until and unless you claim your exemption from their system of things, the benefit of the bond goes to the STATE OF STATE or DEPARTMENT that is insuring your purloined property against loss or damage.
Now notice a couple other things about your Birth Certificate that prove that what I am telling you is true.
A. There are two prominent dates displayed on the certificate. One is your actual birth day. The other is the "File Date" when the PERSON (a corporate municipal franchise) was created and replaced you as the beneficiary of your own assets. So you, the living man or woman, have a birth day--- and the corporate franchise "PERSON" named after you has a birth date which is always a few days or weeks after your birth day. In effect, the BIRTH CERTIFICATE records the "death" of your claim to own your own estate and Trade Name, and the "birth" of the federal PERSON's claim upon your assets. You are always the Holder-in-Due-Course, the Party having the first claim (first in line, first in time) to the Trade Name and Estate, but if you don't claim it, or know how to claim it, you are out of luck and disinherited.
B. The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is signed by the Registrar -- an Officer of the Probate Court, which proves that your estate was probated. The living American state national, for example, the Minnesotan named William Bales Jensen, was taken off the title of his natural estate and his natural nationality and political status was changed to that of "WILLIAM BALES JENSEN" ---a federal Municipal franchise corporation and "citizen of the United States"---- that is, a citizen under the Diversity Clause of the old Federal Code which allows corporations to be citizens..
C. The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is issued on bond paper, giving you "silent Notice" that the assets named on the face of the document --- your unlawfully converted estate assets including the copyright to your Trade Name, your land, your labor, everything that you could ever own--- has been seized upon and bonded by the organization issuing the certificate.
D. The process of false probate just described results in the unlawful conversion of your name and estate assets, makes you a "US citizen" instead of an "American state national", removes you from the jurisdiction of the land and deprives you of your constitutional protections, makes you indebted and obligated to pay the bills of foreign corporations, and otherwise plays havoc with you and your entire country.
E. This is done without your knowledge or consent, without your parent's knowledge or consent, and the people doing this to you are on your payroll, supposed to be rendering you Good Faith service the whole while. Because you don't know that this is being done to you and that these false claims against you are being made, you have no opportunity to object to them, much less delve through it to rebut all these lies and claim your exemption and exercise your indemnity.
Now a few further notes:
For many years the vermin seized upon your Given Christian Trade Name, just as you were taught to print it in First Grade with a first name, middle name, and last name all written in Upper and Lower Case like this: John Michael Doe.
Their federal franchise was structured as a Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trust operated under the same name written in all capital letters: JOHN MICHAEL DOE.
Most recently, the vermin have tried to change their stripes and instead of creating their fictional PERSONS as Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trusts, they have been creating Public Transmitting Utility franchises named after you. How can you tell the difference?
The ESTATE trusts are all named with the full first, middle, and last names appearing in all capital letters: JOHN MICHAEL DOE. The PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITIES all appear with only a Middle Initial, but still in all capital letters: JOHN M. DOE.
Please note that any name in any style that uses only a Middle Initial is not a legal name. It is meaningless and void for lack of specificity. Was that John Michael Doe or John Mark Doe or John Marvin Doe or John Maxwell Doe or.....or....or....
You can always call the vermin on that, because lack of specificity destroys the existence of any jurisdiction actual or fictional. A claim against such a named entity can only stand if you just assume it is your name and accept the charges without objection.
This technicality is not the essence of the problem nor your strongest defense. This is just to point out that what they are doing is blatantly, obviously, on-the-face-of-it-illegal, and you don't need any rocket science to prove that it is, nor any other cause to object. If you raise this objection and they proceed against you, they are dead meat upon appeal --- a fact that may not be known to you, but which is written in stone above their heads: if you don't properly identify the parties, you have no claim.
Now that you know what the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is and what its functions are, it will make more sense to you that you need to get it verified as a genuine document ---and this is where the process of authentication comes in.
Why "authentication" and why not an "apostile" nor a "certification"?
Countries that are signers on the Hague Conventions use apostiles to verify genuine documents passing between themselves. Countries that are not part of the Hague Conventions use authentication for the same purpose. Certification is an "in-house" domestic equivalent of a guarantee and isn't strong enough for international use.
The United States of America never signed the Hague Conventions. The United States did.
As a result, documents issued by or pertaining to The United States of America and its international functions have to be "authenticated" while documents issued by or pertaining to the United States have to "apostiled". Both processes serve the same purpose of verifying the record and the paper.
When you act as an American state national you are acting under the auspices of The United States of America, so when you are ready to reclaim your assets and exercise your exemptions, you use documents that are authenticated.
If you were an actual federal employee or dependent and acting under the auspices of the United States, Inc. as a franchise of the Municipal government or as a citizen of the Territorial government (either one) you would use documents that are apostiled.
All that is the reason why you go through the turkey trot of getting your records officially verified and why you need to do this correctly.
I recommend getting at least two if not three copies of your Birth Certificate ordered from the Vital Statistics people. Keep one and send two to the State Secretary of State and ask for an "authentication" to do business in Indonesia--- a non-Hague Convention country. They will add a cover sheet, signature, and seal guaranteeing that the attached BC is genuine.
Next, take the state-authenticated documents and send them to the United States of America Secretary of State's Office in DC and request the same service --- authentication of the BC for use in Indonesia.
Each authentication requires a small fee. At the end of the day, you get back a three page document --- the original BC you got from Vital Statistics, the State Secretary of State's cover page, and on top of that, a yellow, heavy-weight cover page from the USA Secretary of State's Office.
That yellow page verifies the authenticity of the State Secretary of State's guarantee and it tells you explicitly which federal entity--STATE OF STATE franchise or DEPARTMENT--- issued the indemnity receipt and is responsible for guaranteeing your exemption from all this rot.
Now, finally, you have the proof in your hand of what has been done to you, who did it, and who is liable for it. You have the lawn mower, and now all you need is the gas.

DECEMBER 3 2017 visitor No.649138 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

In 2013 a committee in the house of lords was tasked with examining the effects of the Mental capacity act 2005 and their findings were a shock, but, what has become more of a shock is,..
WHAT HAS CHANGED IN 4 YEARS?? THE victims just pile up!!

The courts and it's agents or staff are just turning a blind eye and condoning whats going on whilst ministers continue the status quo to effect a heist of multi billions of pounds from the most vulnerable in society using their contacts and friends to make sure that anyone going up against them is targetted to suppress discent. This is TYRANNY. A TYRANNY largely protected by the harassment act.
The harassment act has become one of the best government acts to protect white collar crime protecting the BAR and Judges alike extending across the board to the current CEO of the Ministry of Justice this in reality is RACKETEERING to protect the effects TYRANNY from a government unwilling to change a multi billion pound empire/heist for them.
By their acts they are manufacturing activists, now expanding at such a rate it won't be long before tides turn very violent.
The greed is astounding!
Court agent responses are literally a joke and they seriously do think they are going to get away with it!

DECEMBER 1 2017 visitor No.649080 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
ACLAND-HOOD ANDREWS click the pic for 9 page pdf

There are 7 more days left to respond for the MoJ CEO Susan: and we are expecting no response, based upon this assumption, we serve this notice of liability upon her, to underline the seriousness and to add weight, that it is in her best interests to deal with this matter & to respond with urgency. It can be seen clearly in the recent coresspondence the establishment's stratergy is to put up a brick wall and claim harassment, but is now being used in our understanding, as a conduit to facilitate fraud upon the court as it was previously in 2012 to assist it's passage, which goes by no other name than RACKETEERING.

NOVEMBER 26 2017 visitor No.648918 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 22 2017 Visiter No.648827 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 20 2017 Visiter No.648782 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 19 2017 Visiter No.648705 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


NOVEMBER 18 2017 Visiter No.648700 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 17 2017 Visiter No.648690 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 16 2017 Visiter No.648638 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Upon reading the Hague convention Apostiled Commercial Liens, truth statement documents, unrebutted, by bent jewdiciary & the UK Ministry of Justice, the BENISWAT team considerd there was no realistic grounds to keep the pair and duely released them back into the crowd of 40,000 today!!

NOVEMBER 16 2017 Visiter No.648627 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click to enlarge

NOVEMBER 14 2017 Visiter No.648565 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 13 2017 Visiter No.648542 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
susan-elizabeth: ACLAND-HOOD ANDREWS

Susan-elizabeth: ACLAND-HOOD ANDREWS, her postion prior to becoming susan ACLAND HOOD the CEO of HMCTS was a service head of strategy!
So the question is now, what is her strategy for HMCTS because her twitter account portrays her as vowing to listen to the public but the reality is quite the opposite by not placing the public in the postion she portrays.
Upon my telephone call to susan albeit extremely brief, was to confirm service of documents in which she claimed was highly inappropriate.
My mum's life being trashed at the disabled age of 77, by HMCTS is in my opinion very appropriate considering our, in exile wait to find justice of 5 years is an absolute joke.
So susan, let's put things into perspective.
Why don't you enlighten the public with your legal or lawful training that qualifies you to be in the position of consuming £3000 per week of tax payers money seeing as your staff appear to be extremely concerned about tax payers money, being misused to correspond with what are in reality, the abused by HMCTS?
It seems perfectly clear that there is a two tier justice system operating where the poor are forced into only one section and its this section that is committing fraud on a grand scale.
Questions have been posed to the CEO whom has chose according to letters received to have others respond on her behalf. Employers are vicariously liable under the doctrine of "respondeat superior" for the negligent acts or omissions by their employees in the course of employment. The key phrase is "in the course of employment".
I cannot make it any clearer than I have, your staff have not answered the questions posed to them making their acts and omissions to answer your liability susan. Your staff have also in attempting to deflect the questions have quoted the misuse of tax payers money and the threat of harassment charges in their attempt to deflect the questions and intimidate the public. This is vicarious liablity for FRAUD in the course of employment.
You as CEO bear full responsisbilty for such. You are the one stealing tax payers money at the rate of £3000 weekly by not standing up to your responsibilities.
Susan, please show some respect for the elderly and do as you publish, LISTEN to the public and ACT appropriately!
These matters are not going to go away, putting up a brick wall is not the stratergy one would expect from a civil servant receiving £150,000 per year of tax payers money that is also issuing threats of harassment!
Mike: Clarke

NOVEMBER 13 2017 Visiter No.648535 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 11 2017 Visiter No.648490 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Mike Whitby

Mr Len Lawrence
Susan Acland-Hood. Chief Executive, Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS)
Dear Ms Acland-Hood,
I, and I suspect many many others received the email below: Sent by snail mail to John Andrews partner of Susan Acland-Hood. Address 23 Arrow Road. Bow. London E3 3HE I wish more would write in complaining of her allowing her staff to be unlawfully instructed by judges I Leonard Lawrence understands that if one writes to you husband, then one's case is prioritised, handed to RICHARD REDGRAVE Head of Customer Investigations, HMCTS Security Branch and the Police. I do not intend to send mail to your husband or to your home. .
By some considerable margin the vast majority of your staff have been extremely helpful and accommodating to me, in my own Pursuit of the Truth. The title In Pursuit of the Truth is the title of a book written by Det Ch. Insp Clive Driscoll ISBN 978-1-78503-006-2 .
You will see from the slide below that HMCTS Queen's Bench Division released to me barrister Caroline Willbourne, 1 Garden Court Chambers, report on Leonard Lawrence to The Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court Laurence Oates. Incapable of legal discussion and understanding. The former Chief Executive, Joe Turner, 1 Garden Court Chambers, had refused to disclose to me barrister Caroline Willbourne report. .
Why the Bar Standards Board (BSB) have entered the arena by releasing Alastair Pitbaldo, Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts, correspondence to the Bar Standards Board is unknown, but much appreciated. Also appreciated is Caroline Willbourne email to the BSB refusing to swear an affidavit to support her submission to the BSB.
"coup de grâce"
Alastair Pitbaldo, Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts 24 June 2009 Ref LNF 41919/0S LEONARD LAWRENCE It was not necessary for solicitor Helen Mary Clift to inform the court of the existence of the Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3's 29 December 2005 Mrs. Motteram & Mrs. Ballard, Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office
The Official Solicitor (Laurence Oates) is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf. .
Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor and a member of the Family Justice Council, Appointments Committee, has a remarkable auditable history of non-disclosure to District Judges, Circuit Judges and High Court Family Judges. .
Lord Justice Munby
Are parents being certified without medicals and placed under Alastair Pitbaldo, May Maughan and Helen Clift. The parents protected status not disclosed to the Court of Protection, and other courts, their children taken and their assets disposed of ? (Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk) Daniel FOGGO, SUNDAY TIMES - 14-Jun-2009 January 2006-June 2009 Alastair Pitbaldo department has been brought in to represent 588 parents deemed to “lack the mental capacity” to instruct lawyers in cases where their children faced the possibility of adoption.
Ms Susan Acland-Hood. Chief Executive, Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) Where is the re-transferring ORDER HHJ Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, made to the Court of Appeal in February 2013 ?
In Argus Panoptes 14 Yours respectfully
Leonard Lawrence bcc 76
29 December 2005 Mrs. Motteram & Mrs. Ballard, Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf. Barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk. "All that I can show is that the Official Solicitor agreed the sale value" No said Barrister Simon Calhaem instructed by Laurence Oates, Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court.

NOVEMBER 10 2017 Visiter No.648460 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 9 2017 Visiter No.648439 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

and our reply immediately


NOVEMBER 9 2017 Visiter No.648420 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
susan-elizabeth:ACLAND-HOOD ANDREWS

NOVEMBER 7 2017 Visiter No.648357 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

DPAResponse01112017.pdf here

NOVEMBER 7 2017 Visiter No.648340 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 6 2017 Visiter No.648317 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


also delivered to susans twitter account
also delivered to husband john's email account
also delivered to susan's email account at HMCTS
also to be delivered by hand process server into susans hand

NOVEMBER 3 2017 Visiter No.648254 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Taken yesterday me and my mum

NOVEMBER 2 2017 Visiter No.648215 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 1 2017 Visiter No.648183 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

We are now trying to track down the deliveryRECEIVED 11.11.2017

NOVEMBER 1 2017 Visiter No.648177 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOVEMBER 1 2017 Visiter No.648175 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 31 2017 Visiter No.648128 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

letter linked here

OCTOBER 31 2017 Visiter No.648123 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOTICES merged and sent recorded here

OCTOBER 30 2017 Visiter No.648120 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Just exactly what they did to my mum

OCTOBER 30 2017 Visiter No.648105 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

NOTICES merged and sent recorded here

OCTOBER 30 2017 Visiter No.648102 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 28 2017 Visiter No.648050 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 27 2017 Visiter No.648033 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 26 2017 Visiter No.648000 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 25 2017 Visiter No.647942 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 22 2017 Visiter No.647810 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 21 2017 Visiter No.647788 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

and our reply forthwith

OCTOBER 21 2017 Visiter No.647770 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 19 2017 Visiter No.647711 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 18 2017 Visiter No.647692 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 15 2017 Visiter No.647596 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


OCTOBER 15 2017 Visiter No.647594 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER Fri 13 2017 Visiter No.647505 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 12 2017 Visiter No.647482 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

living will here

OCTOBER 10 2017 Visiter No.647431 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 10 2017 Visiter No.647418 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


OCTOBER 5 2017 Visiter No.647310 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

OCTOBER 4 2017 Visiter No.647286 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


OCTOBER 3 2017 Visiter No.647255 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Our Situation Report
Truly understanding where we are requires a knowledge of where we have been in the past--- and that is not easy to come by, both because the facts have been obscured by guilty parties and because most people have not been motivated to learn.
So that we can hit the highlights and get up to speed in the present----
Part I -- We Begin
1. The government of this country is vested in its people. "People" means "militia" in Hebrew. There is no doubt that the Founders meant for the government to be created and controlled by the same militia men who defended the country then and who defend it now.
2. The actual government is an unincorporated business known as a Body Politic.
3. The name given to this Body Politic on September 9, 1776, was: The United States of America.
4. This is a totally unique unincorporated entity and we hold its Declaration of Independence and its Letters Patent and its sacred name under Common Law Copyright in perpetuity.
5. The United States of America is not a sovereign nation. It is a consortium known as a "union" of sovereign nations.
6. Thus, when you look at this country, what you are actually seeing are fifty smaller countries, each with their own history, their own geographic boundaries, and their own natural government. In America the words "state" and "nation" are interchangeable. Thus, the "interstate commerce clause" can also be read as the "international commerce clause" and "Ohio State Bank" can also be read "Ohio National Bank".
7. For their mutual benefit, these independent small countries banded together and formed the union called The United States of America and they delegated their international jurisdiction (also known as "territorial jurisdiction"), both on the land (organized as Federal Postal Districts) and on the sea (organized as US Districts) to it.
8. The unincorporated union of sovereign states called "The United States of America" holds and exercises all their combined international "powers".
9. The United States of America then delegated nineteen of these international powers to the British-backed United States organization, lodged in the District of Columbia.
10. Neither of these organizations were incorporated originally. Each had its own population and its own geographical territory. This was the practical result of The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783, which describes the two populations as "the free, sovereign and independent people of the United States" and the "inhabitants" ---British citizens--- who remained behind after the War of Independence to provide "essential government services".
11. This arrangement resulted in two Constitutions --- one in 1787 called "The Constitution for the united States of America" that separated out the international powers of the member states and joined them together under the auspices of The United States of America (unincorporated), and one in 1789 called "The Constitution of the United States of America" which created The United States entity and its government to exercise the nineteen (19) delegated functions.
Part II - A House Divided
12. This unsteady dual sovereignty endured until the so-called American Civil War---- which was never declared as a war by the united States of America in Congress Assembled, and it was never ended by a peace treaty. As such, it was and remains an illegal commercial mercenary action on our shores.
13. Following the end of the armed hostilities, a completely new incorporated entity merely calling itself "The United States of America" (Incorporated) was launched in 1868. Unlike the actual unincorporated government it was deceptively named after, this was a incorporated entity like any other. The Congress ceased acting in their public office and began functioning as a corporate Board of Directors.
14. The effect of this was glossed over and subtle and hard for the people to recognize, but it unlawfully converted our unincorporated government into an incorporated one, infringed on our copyrights to do it, and substituted a private, mostly foreign-owned corporation in its place. This in turn removed the government from the land jurisdiction and dumped it in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
15. At first this seemed to have little impact because the "federal government" and its international functions had always been operating in the international jurisdiction anyway. The switch from public interest to private interest went largely unnoticed, but the pilfering and mischief began--- and by 1907, "The United States of America" (Incorporated) was bankrupt.
16. Shortly before this, a series of Supreme Court cases known collectively as the "Insular Tariff" cases allowed the incorporated Municipal United States to expand its franchises into the geographically defined states. So when The United States of America (Incorporated) went bankrupt in 1907, its functions were immediately picked up by yet another version called "the" United States of America (Incorporated).
17. This second version -- another private, mostly foreign-owned governmental services corporation -- was bankrupted in its turn, first, internationally, by treaty among the G-5 nations in 1930 at the Geneva Conventions, and then domestically in 1933 by Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
18. This left us with two bankrupt foreign federal governmental services corporations, one called "The United States of America" (Incorporated) and another called "the United States of America" (Incorporated) and they conveniently named us and our states as the Sureties for their debts----so that our land was held as collateral for the debts of The United States of America, Inc. until that bankruptcy settled in 1953, and our labor and private property was conscripted and held as collateral for the debts of "the" United States of America, Inc., until that bankruptcy settled in 1999.
Part III - The Filthy Bastards
19. During the bankruptcy of both of these incorporated entities, more fun and games ensued with new incorporated entities that merely moved into town and "assumed" the vacated service contracts owed to us under the actual Constitution --- enter the UNITED STATES (INC) and USA (Inc.). One, the UNITED STATES (INC.) being a Municipal corporation organized in France and the other, the USA, Inc., being a Territorial corporation organized in Puerto Rico--- and both being foreign to us and to our states and having no proper contract or affiliation with us whatsoever.
20. In international jurisdiction it is possible to act as a "successor to contract" and to "assume" a contract, so long as nobody objects, and since nobody but the perpetrators of this system knew what was going on at the time, nobody objected.
21. Now, as of May 2015, the UNITED STATES, (INC.) is in Chapter 7 Liquidation and as of this year, 2017, the USA, Inc., is in Chapter 11 Reorganization.
22. It is the obvious plan of the perpetrators to pull the same tricks again and make the clueless Americans pay for it all. As preparation, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was incorporated under the municipal (city-state) auspices of the United Nations to take over the lucrative governmental services contracts of the bankrupt UNITED STATES (INC.) and a new territorial entity calling itself "Republic United States" has been formed as a Nevada Corporation. Still more contenders have been formed off-shore, including a new thing out of Costa Rica calling itself "The United States of America" (Inc.---again.) and The Unity States of America (Inc.) and so on.
23. During this time period, American babies were seized upon as chattel backing the debts of these corporations under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit and deliberately mis-identified as the progeny of unwed Mothers surrendered as wards of the incorporated "STATES". Their worldly goods--the copyrights to their Names, their land, their homes, their bodies, and even their souls-- were "securitized" and traded as assets and were presumed to be "donated" to benefit the incorporated "States of States", while they themselves were deemed to be paupers and incompetents and slaves owned by these respective commercial corporations.
24. These gross criminal acts of personage and barratry against innocent civilian populations, fraud and breach of trust with respect to international treaties, violation of commercial contracts, institutionalized identity theft, unlawful conversion, acts of inland piracy against their employers, press-ganging, kidnapping, enslavement and other crimes perpetuated against the American states and people have provided a vast and insurmountable public record of infamy and led to the demand that these corporations be liquidated as crime syndicates operating on our shores.
25. We note that these activities continued on despite objection and evidence and regardless of which political party was in power. They continued even after they were prosecuted and given Notice under international law. Many of these crimes have been internationally outlawed for centuries and some are capital level war crime offenses. These crimes have been committed against Americans at home, and at the same time, the same perpetrators have committed these and similar crimes "in our names" while claiming to represent us abroad.
Part IV -- We Wake Up and Return Home
26. In 1998, things conspired so that some Americans woke up. Commander Russell Gould seized the Title IV Flag abandoned in the wreckage of the bankruptcy settlement of "the United States of America" (Inc.) and re-entered it in the United Nations. He also re-opened the actual Post Office in Philadelphia. Meanwhile, my husband and I served Notice to the Governors of the "States of States" and the Internal Revenue Service and the Queen and the Pope, objecting to the fraud and criminality and Breach of Trust involved in all of this.
27. For the next ten years we privately pursued Due Process and continued to give Notice to all parties concerned and conducted the necessary research and discovery to determine and demonstrate both Breach of Trust and violation of Commercial Contract with respect to us and our states of the Union.
28. In 2008, our complaints were heard by the Vatican Chancery Court and a determination made by Benedict XVI in our favor and efforts to remedy began, including a Final Order defining once and for all the naming conventions and tax statuses of all the "named vessels" involved in this chicanery.
29. By 2011, we had re-opened our Federal Postal District Courts and began the final series of Due Process presentations throughout the land jurisdiction occupied by our sovereign unincorporated states.
30. In April 2014, we issued Final Judgment of Breach of Trust and Violation of Commercial Contract. We gave international Notice and Due Process to all Principal Parties and many, many agents and agencies.
31. On November 4, 2015, we issued new Sovereign Letters Patent, and on November 6, 2015, inclusive Sovereign Letters Patent and a Joint Declaration of Sovereignty together with the American Athabascan and Lakota Sioux Nations. By so doing we preserved our actual Constitution and chose new "federal" partners indigenous to this country. This was again given full Due Process and international Notice.
32. We solicited and processed claimants from all fifty land jurisdiction states competent to inherit the land as heirs and as representatives of the people, jural assembly members, and members of their respective state militias going back before the so-called Civil War and most before the War of Independence. These Americans also signed paperwork making their political status explicit and placed it on the public record, so that there can be no doubt that all fifty land jurisdiction states are occupied and possessed by lawful heirs.
33. On January 6, 2017, we issued a series of Private Sovereign Indemnity Bonds securing the claims of the American states and people as Priority Creditors and Paramount Security Interest Holders against the UNITED STATES and all of its various franchises including the STATES OF STATES, and also against the USA, Inc. and its franchises including the States of States.
34. Also on January 6, 2017, we issued a Payment Bond and lodged it with the Vatican Chancery Court, which is the bank for the Holy See, and redeemed all the Named and NAMED entities worldwide.
35. We, the American states and people, are the Priority Creditors and Paramount Security Interest Holders of all Municipal governments and all Territorial governments and all the various corporations formed under the auspices of these governments worldwide.
Part V -- A Brief Practical Explanation of the Circumstance
36. Two dreadful World Wars had left the entire Earth suffering and demolished. In 1945, simply cleaning up the wreckage seemed an insurmountable task and unbearable expense for most of Europe and much of the Far East.
37. The U.S. Army never stood down and the American states and people were "presumed upon" and never allowed to return to peacetime status. Our factories were never re-tooled, our taxes were never relieved, our entire country and its resources were pushed to the uttermost for decades after 1945 to rebuild and finance the rebuilding of the entire world.
38. This is why we have been worked like animals and enslaved and imposed upon for eighty years-- to rebuild after the World Wars.
39. Now, when it comes time to pay us back, the actual debtors--- all the many foreign countries of Europe and around the world, can't afford to pay us back. The debts are astronomical, in the quadrillions of dollars.
40. So all these "incorporated" municipal and territorial franchise governments doing business as, for example, "JAPAN" and "Japan", have all quietly, by treaty again, declared bankruptcy to discharge all this accumulated debt.
41. That is fine enough. We are wise enough to know about blood and turnips. And we didn't rebuild the world to lord it over our neighbors or destroy it again with another stupid war over money. However, there are some issues that cannot and won't be ignored.
42. The perpetrators of these plans and circumstances set it up so that we have not been represented. We, the Priority Creditors and Paramount Security Interest Holders have been studiously left in the dark, with the expectation that we would not step forward and tell the world these facts, which would then allow the international banks to act as Secondary Creditors and claim our assets as "abandoned property".
43. It isn't bad enough that everyone involved planned with malice aforethought to borrow all this money and labor and resources from us and then claim bankruptcy, but they further planned to make false claims on abandonment and steal everything that belongs to us naturally, adding an insurmountable insult to already ripened injury.
44. So as we take our rightful place as the lawful and only true and actual government left standing, and settle our claim as the Priority Creditors and Paramount Security Interest Holders of virtually every government and every incorporated business on this planet, we have this to say---- it's our right and obligation to do justice and grant mercy, to live up to the best that America can be and turn our backs on what it has been mis-represented to be--- but our assets are ours and they are not abandoned.
45. Finally, we say, this system is at an end. We have published our conditional acceptance and told both THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the Republic United States and all the other wannabe Successors to Contract, thanks but no thanks. Any services we receive, we receive on a limited and transitional month by month basis and we allow no assumption of contract beyond that. We have made our arrangements and we are conducting our own business, restoring the lawful government and the Public Law pending action to call a Continental Congress into session.
Part VI - America's Hereditary Head of State
46. In 1087 A.D. William of Normandy died and made his senior nobles, relatives of his from Normandy who made the Norman Conquest possible, "free sovereigns in their own right" in England. This is known as The Settlement of the Norman Conquest. The Belle Chers ---Anglicized to "Belcher"-- were among those so honored.
47. A little more than a hundred years later, they were among those who created and enforced the Magna Carta.
48. By 1609, they were among the first men to enter Boston Harbor and begin building the city.
49. By 1776, they were lawyers and neighbors of John Adams in Braintree, Massachusetts.
50. They were also officers in the Continental Army; William Belcher was a Colonel who fought in the Battle of White Plains and other engagements. He was also a free sovereign in England, having Elder Title, and outranking King George.
51. When The United States of America was formed to hold all the powers of the individual states in international jurisdiction and subsequently to delegate some of those powers to The United States, there had to be a Head of State to hold and exercise the "reserved powers" --- those powers in international jurisdiction that were retained by the American states and people and not delegated away.
52. The Head of State had to be a sovereign in his own right, and hopefully, someone who understood and supported the American vision. William Belcher was put forward by John Adams as a solution to the problem and his family Coat of Arms was thus employed to create both The Great Seal of the United States of America and The Great Seal of the United States.
53. Every American ship and "vessel" in trade or commerce that has set sail on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waters since then has operated under his sovereignty and his seal.
54. James Clinton Belcher is the lawful heir and progeny of William Belcher and right-wise enabled to wield The Great Seal in whatever capacity and manner he chooses in international jurisdiction.
55. Though an artist by trade and fully loathing politics of all kinds, he has stepped forward in this hour of need to exercise those powers vested in him as the lawful Head of State owed to this country and has brought forward the claims of the American states and people as the Priority Creditors and Paramount Security Interest Holders in the worldwide bankruptcy, and he has also provided for their defense against false claims of abandonment, and provided evidence that their land and homes, businesses, and bodies are not chattel and not voluntarily standing as sureties for the debts of the UNITED STATES (INC.) and USA, Inc. which have abused their employers and benefactors, trespassed and infringed upon our copyrights, plundered our national trust, and done so under conditions of fraud and deceit.
56. By posting the Private Registered Indemnity Bonds covering all the actual states and people and by posting the Payment Bond redeeming all the Names and NAMES of these vessels, we have completed everything necessary to reclaim and release the assets, set aside the debts, and restore lawful government to the entire world.
57. We have also rebutted all claims that we voluntarily abandoned, declaimed, or traded away our birthrights for petty considerations.
The governments of the world for the past 150 years have been run as crime syndicates with all the terrible results that we now see, but we have the opportunity as the Priority Creditors and Paramount Security Interest Holders to put an end to the evil that has been and give birth to the good that can be.
Please share this information far and wide and let it be passed on and passed out and understood by everyone in every corner and nation. Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary James Clinton Belcher, Head of State

OCTOBER 3 2017 Visiter No.647232 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
as a complaint in pdf

OCTOBER 2 2017 Visiter No.647210 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
DEFINING the tricks of corporate court language 'LEGAL-EASE' fraud
Legalese is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with the sole intention of stopping you believing that what they are saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the English language. Their purpose is to cheat you and rob you.
For example, they will say to you "Do you understand?" . In English, that means "Do you comprehend what I am saying to you?" and the automatic response would be "Yes", meaning "I do comprehend what you are saying to me". But these sneaky, underhand people have changed the meaning in Legalese to mean "Do you stand under me?" meaning "Do you grant me authority over you so that you have to obey whatever I tell you to do?".
What makes it even worse, is the fact that they will never tell you that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I don't know what is! If you answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that you are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not that is actually true is debatable because that is effectively a verbal contract between you and them and for any contract to be valid, there has to be full and open disclosure of all of the terms of the contract, and then, unreserved acceptance by both parties, and in these cases, that has most definitely, not occurred.
But what is the point in all this? Well, this manoeuvre is intended to trick you into agreeing to represent your strawman. Why? Aaah now, that is a good question, but to answer it takes a bit of explaining, and you need to understand the overall situation:
All humans are born equal, with complete freedom of choice and action. If you live in the same place as a lot of other people, then there are a few restrictions which have grown up, by common consent, over time. These restrictions are for your protection and the protection of the other people living near you. These restrictions are called "the Law" (or more accurately: "Common Law") and they are few in number and very easy to understand.
They are: You must not injure or kill anyone. You must not steal or damage things owned by somebody else. You must be honest in your dealings and not swindle anyone. These have resulted from hundreds of years of disputes which have been dealt with through using common sense and the opinions of ordinary people. They are the only limitations on you, and if you don't want to abide by them, then you need to go to some isolated place and stay away from other people.
Many people think that there are hundreds of other laws which they have to keep (and new ones every other day), but that is not so. Those other things are called "statutes" and keeping them is optional for you, the human, BUT they are not optional for your fictitious strawman, and that is why the people who benefit from those things want to persuade you to represent your strawman and so become subject to all of their invented restrictions and charges. If you knew that they were optional, would you agree to: Give most of your earnings away in taxes and similar charges? Pay to own a vehicle? Pay to own a television set? Pay to drive on roads which were built with your money? Be forced to join armed services if you are told to? Send an army which is supposed to represent you, into another country to murder innocent people there?
Were you ever told that these things are optional? If you agree to represent your strawman, then these things become binding on you.
These are some of the "statutes" which 'politicians' keep inventing in order to make you poor, make them and their friends rich, and keep you in a position where you have to do everything they say, no matter how much that harms you and does away with your natural rights and freedom.
But, says somebody, we elect a government to represent us and so we have to do what they say, after all, they have our best interests at heart don't they? Well, that is a nice thought, but is it actually true? No it isn't. You think that you elect politicians to represent you in your government, but that is not what you actually do. That is part of a very carefully fostered illusion intended to keep you in your place and giving most of your earnings away (typically, 80% of all you earn). Part of the secret is that what is supposed to be your 'government' is actually a privately owned, for-profit company and all that you do when voting, is help choose the serving officers inside that company. It will never make the slightest difference to what happens in the future as the company policy and actions are controlled by the owners of the company and they are not influenced in any way whatsoever by what you want.
Think this is far fetched? Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it's financial records, is also a private company.
Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company and not a person.
It gets even more ridiculous when you discover that The Devon and Cornwall Police is a company which has been taken over by a company owned by IBM which is paid an annual budget of £256,800,000 taken from members of the public. Gilbert and Sullivan would have loved this reality as a script for one of their comedies. Lancashire County Council was incorporated as a company (IP00666C) in 2002. It’s registered office was "3rd Floor, Christ Church Precinct, County Hall, Preston" and it was completely dissolved on 25th January 2008 and all of it’s Assets and Liabilities were transferred on 12th November 2007 to another company - “The Blues and Twos Credit Union Ltd.” whose registered address is Lancashire Police Headquarters, PO Box 77, Hutton, Preston.[The very business to which I am reporting corporate FRAUD on the COURT to, by the DOG-LATIN deception of legal-ease or by any other name the crimes of PERSONAGE & BARRATRY upon living man,] whom are just referring me back to the bent BAR ASSOCIATION! wow!
Do you by any chance get the feeling that you are being taken for a ride here? Just in case you are not aware of it, the purpose of any commercial 'for-profit' company or corporation is to make money for it's owners (and shareholders if there are any). The people whom you think of as 'The Government' don't do anything which earns money - instead, they take money from you and their main job is to make sure that you don't realise that they are in the same position as IBM which takes away a cool £256 million of your money every year."
So, why all the pretence of there being a genuine government which you elect and who serve you? They don't want you to understand that they are just running a company which produces nothing of any worth - something like a betting shop, where almost every customer loses money - and wake up to the fact that, unlike what you have been told all your life, this is all optional and you don't need to play their rip-off game any longer unless you want to. They want you to be so burdened down with paying them money and working so hard and so long that you don't have the time, money or energy to stop and think about what is happening to you and your family.
They are desperate to stop you from just walking away from their scam, and so they make every effort to connect you with the fiction which is your strawman because fictitious entities like commercial companies can't have any dealing with a real man or a real woman - they can only deal with another fiction like your strawman, and it is essential that they fool you into believing that you have to act on behalf of your strawman - which you don't.
They have a number of well-proven methods of distracting you and keeping you from finding out. They want you to see a great deal of entertainment, not because there is anything wrong with entertainment, but while you are watching it you will not be asking awkward questions. Also, they are very careful that most entertainment reinforces their make-believe world and makes it appear to be "the real world" where everyone is under 'The Government', Police Officers uphold the law, taxes are essential in order to keep things going and things which are said to be bad for you, are taxed heavily (not to make money) but supposedly, to encourage you to avoid those things.
They also have another very effective technique, and that is fear. They want you to be afraid. Afraid of imaginary terrorists. Afraid of disasters. Afraid of new diseases. Afraid of foreign countries. Afraid of "the economy" doing badly and inflation rising. If you doubt this, then take a look at the news and count the number of positive, uplifting news items, and the number of negative or depressing news items. It doesn't take much in the way of research to see the very heavy negative bias in the news.
The reason behind this is to make you feel that you need a government and an army to protect you from these supposed dangers. It is easy to keep the news items biased that way, because all of the major news agencies and media outlets in the world are owned by only five or six privately owned commercial companies.
So to supposedly connect you to the strawman which they created for you when your birth was registered, they use the Legalese technique of conning you with the Name of the strawman. If you are ill-advised enough to go to a Court (which is a Corporate place of Business) as the accused, you will be asked to confirm your name, quoting the full name shown on your birth certificate, which is the LEGAL PERSONALITY. Titles such as Mr, Dr, Lord, PC, QC, or whatever are not asked for as they are not required. The “Accused” is actually the LEGAL PERSONALITY which is the name on the birth certificate, so when they ask for the person’s NAME, they are talking to the LEGAL PERSONALITY and not the human. This is because a human cannot exist in the legal world - only pieces of paper can, and that is something which they are very careful not to tell you.

OCTOBER 1 2017 Visiter No.647201 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 30 2017 Visiter No.647184 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

I used this template in my case and it was dismissed very quickly. Here is more information in support of: OATH OF OFFICE MAKES PUBLIC OFFICIALS “FOREIGN” Those holding Federal or State public office, county or municipal office, under the Legislative, Executive or Judicial branch, including Court Officials, Judges, Prosecutors, Law Enforcement Department employees, Officers of the Court, and etc., before entering into these public offices, are required by the U.S. Constitution and statutory law to comply with Title 5 USC, Sec. §3331, “Oath of office.” State Officials are also required to meet this same obligation, according to State Constitutions and State statutory law.
All oaths of office come under 22 CFR, Foreign Relations, Sections §§92.12 - 92.30, and all who hold public office come under Title 8 USC, Section §1481 “Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions.”
Under Title 22 USC, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, Section §611, a Public Official is considered a foreign agent. In order to hold public office, the candidate must file a true and complete registration statement with the State Attorney General as a foreign principle. The Oath of Office requires the public official in his / her foreign state capacity to uphold the constitutional form of government or face consequences.
Title 10 USC, Sec. §333, “Interference with State and Federal law” The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Such willful action, while serving in official capacity, violates Title 18 USC, Section §1918: Title 18 USC, Section §1918 “Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the government” Whoever violates the provision of 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he— (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(2) Is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both. And also deprives claimants of “honest services:
Title 18, Section §1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud” “For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services. and the treaties that placed your public offices in that foreign state under international law and under the United Nation jurisdiction:
1945 IOIA –That the International Organizations Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; Title 22, Sections 288 to 2886 U.S.C.) the US relinquished every office TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1101
The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states 19 Corpus Juris Secundum § 883, [t]he United States government is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state.
All "public servants," officials, Congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their various agencies, etc., are the express agents of these foreign principals - see Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A, 185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii) & (iii); Treasury Delegation Order #91
“It is a clearly established principle of law that an attorney must represent a corporation, it being incorporeal and a creature of the law. An attorney representing an artificial entity must appear with the corporate charter and law in his hand. A person acting as an attorney for a foreign principal must be registered to act on the principal’s behalf.” See, Foreign Agents Registration Act” (22 USC § 612 et seq.); Victor Rabinowitz et. at. v. Robert F. Kennedy,376 US 605. “Failure to file the "Foreign Agents Registrations Statement" goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§ 219, 951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious.
The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

SEPT 29 2017 Visiter No.647154 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 28 2017 Visiter No.647133 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 28 2017 Visiter No.647123 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Served on Police by recorded delivery and emailed to courts CEO etc

SEPT 26 2017 Visiter No.647068 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
A Message to the Bar Association Members:
Since 1868 this country has been criminally mismanaged and misrepresented in gross breach of trust, and in violation of solemn treaties and commercial service contracts. This has resulted, among other things, in the practice of personage and barratry in courts on a worldwide basis.
Personage is essentially a crime of identity theft. A living man or woman is deliberately presumed to be some form of incorporated entity instead and their lawful Trade Name is trespassed upon and mischaracterized to secure this end.
An example would be a living man named "James Clarence Penny" being deliberately mistaken as a C-Corporation doing business as "JC PENNY", or a public transmitting utility doing business as "JAMES C. PENNY" or a public estate trust doing business as "JAMES CLARENCE PENNY" or a co-operative doing business as "JAS C. PENNY" and so on and on.
Barratry is the associated crime of bringing charges against living people under the false presumption that they are in fact legal fiction entities.
The Bar Association has practiced both personage and barratry against the people since at least 1933. The Prima Facie evidence for this stands upon the court records of every maritime and admiralty court allowed to dry-dock in the country.
Those entrusted to be the guardians of The Law and the purveyors of Justice have instead acted as the ring-leaders and perpetrators of a vast systemic and syndicated multi-generational crime spree, both here and abroad.
Let us observe that the only possible reason that any sane assemblage of people support the existence of courts and lawyers is to ensure that their physical safety is protected, that their property rights are respected, and that a fair means of peacefully arbitrating disputes is made readily available.
By undermining the Public Law and subverting the Cause of Justice, by openly practicing personage and barratry, by creating and then plundering public trusts and other legal fictions purposefully named after living persons, the members of the Bar Association have also undermined their own purported reason to exist and dishonored their profession.
We are in the process of re-venuing the governmental services back to the land jurisdiction states and new federal service providers have been named. We will not be renewing any contract with the American Bar Association or its members, with the result that anyone wishing to retain their Bar Membership will need to de-camp and remove themselves from our courthouses and public buildings no later than January 1, 2018.
Those who wish to provide honest service to the people at the County and State level are invited to study Common Law. We recommend reading Brent Winter's book, The Excellence of the Common Law, as a starting point. Take up the necessary task of re-populating the local and state courts with competent Justices of the Peace.
Those who wish to serve or continue to serve at a federal level will be serving Federal Postal District Courts and Circuit Courts. Any need for "District Courts" will be greatly reduced.
All maritime, admiralty, and 'special admiralty' courts are now required to fly the actual Title 4 Flag and may not operate under color of law via the display of National Colors. All civil courts on our soil are required to fly the U.S. Civil Flag and to operate under the provisions and presumptions of the peacetime Public Law.
We recognize that there are many good and well-intentioned lawyers in this country and even a reasonable number of competent and ethical professional attorneys, but in the end -- the situation is what it is, and it speaks for itself. Six generations have been enslaved by commercial corporations operated in Breach of Trust and under color of law. This outcome would not be possible without the support and knowing consent of a great many lawyers both now and in the past. James Clinton Belcher, Head of State Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary The US (Unincorporated) 103 Likes11 Comments90 Shares

SEPT 24 2017 Visiter No.646999 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


SEPT 21 2017 Visiter No.646982 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 20 2017 Visiter No.646940 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


SEPT 16 2017 Visiter No.646842 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 15 2017 Visiter No.646813 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


SEPT 14 2017 Visiter No.646776 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 13 2017 Visiter No.646741 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 6 2017 Visiter No.646575 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 5 2017 Visiter No.646550 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

court administrator manager response


SEPT 5 2017 Visiter No.646540 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

SEPT 4 2017 Visiter No.646538 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Important Notification Regarding Territorial Claims
What follows is a letter for public knowledge, though the name of the addressee is withheld for obvious reasons. I wish everyone worldwide to know the content of our objections.
Dear M ----
It is with real consternation that I have learned this day of the issuance of a $100 trillion dollar bond against assets in seven western American states, specifically gold in the ground, that the Queen's Territorial United States Government claims is theirs as a result of The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783---- and that the same parties responsible for this, have used my name in vain and claimed (falsely) that I agreed with and authorized this.
The Queen's Government has been in breach of trust since 1822 and has never been owed a single gram of our gold, produced or in the ground, ever since.
You are perhaps in a better position than most to understand the implications of the guile and depravity of the British Crown and the Territorial Government in making such a claim against us and against our assets, long after any such obligation on our part was severed by their own greed and Breach of Trust.
As a matter of fact, they have not had a commercial contract of any kind with us since April 2014, and it is patently ridiculous that this claim was made by anyone or honored by anyone.
You may share my extreme displeasure with the Pope and with other Higher Contracting Powers and be assured that the American Government has no intention of disturbing a centimeter of soil to access any such gold for HRM much less delivering it to her creditors.
To those who have funded this bond against our asset without our knowledge and permission, I say that you are guilty of fraud. The Queen's Territorial Government is not welcome to make such claims and the consideration of all billings must be made on a case by case basis subject to fully disclosed agreement and wet-ink signatures under seal.
At this point, the American Bar Association and its members are under a $279 trillion dollar lien for their part in British predation and inland piracy upon the trusting Americans--- all of it done under color of law and in Breach of Trust.
I need not mention that Our Father is as intensely displeased as I am with these and other actions taken even after those responsible have confessed their guilt and pleaded for mercy and promised to reform in exchange for their lives.
Let their reforms be genuine or their lives will be forfeit.
Night before last in Rome, twelve of the Draconian Lords met in secret and I observed their meeting. They discussed among themselves how they have run up the stock market and the gold prices preparatory to collapsing both and leaving the world in chaos.
Certainly you know that this is all unacceptable in the extreme, and contrary to our agreement to hold these individuals harmless in consideration of their professed reform and cooperation. It is also extremely naïve and disrespectful toward me and my embassy.
These and other indications of double-dealing and Bad Faith have left me no choice but to order the activation of VAXX. If there are any further infractions against the peace or false claims against American assets, any moves to collapse the stock market, or threats from UN Corporation troops, those responsible will be removed. Permanently. Anna Maria

SEPT 2 2017 Visiter No.646478 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 28 2017 Visiter No.646352 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?
Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!
7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel (Summon or Subpoena) you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!
11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated. Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic.

AUG 27 2017 Visiter No.646316 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 27 2017 Visiter No.646312 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 25 2017 Visiter No.646265 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 25 2017 Visiter No.646260 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click to enlarge - 40 days & counting

SAR pdf here

AUG 24 2017 Visiter No.646237 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
by the crime of PERSONAGE & BARRATRY

The Real Criminals
1. Look up the Public Laws governing Citizen’s Arrest in your state. Get ready to use them.
2. Now, let’s pretend we set up a system of “naming conventions” such that the following rules apply:
john–quincy: adams = a living American endowed with all his natural rights
John Quincy Adams = a foreign situs trust used in commercial shipping
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = a foreign estate trust
John Q. Adams = a public transmitting utility company
John q. Adams = a public foundation
JOHN Q. Adams = a cooperative
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = a boat or ship used in public commerce
JOHN QUINCY Adams = a commonwealth trust
J. QUINCY Adams = a slave owned by Exxon Corporation
J.Q. Adams = a foreign pauper forbidden to own land
Adams, John Q. = a taxpayer
ADAMS, JOHN Q. = a soldier
adams, john q. = a slave
There are dozens of different potential meanings that can be arbitrarily assigned to anyone’s name and used to “represent” radically different entities. In a verbal conversation we can talk all day long about someone or something named “John Quincy Adams” and which john quincy adams or what kind of JOHN QUINCY ADAMS will never be known, except from the context of the conversation — but on paper the use of such a system instantly defines what or whom is being talked about — if you know the system.
This is what the lawyers, bankers, and politicians have used to enslave you. It is a crime known as “personage”. By arbitrarily creating an Estate trust named after you and claiming to own this thing they created, they have falsely claimed to own you and your assets and to literally buy and sell “you” on stock exchanges, ship “you” out of ports, and tax “you” for doing things you’ve never done. After all, there is no law against enslaving an ESTATE trust, is there? Or arresting a slave? Or charging a tax on importing revenue to Puerto Rico?
Hand in hand with personage comes “barratry” — the crime of knowingly bringing false claims into court. So what happens every day all across America, when charges are brought against the ESTATES of “dead men” who are standing right in front of the judge and jury? Barratry — a crime that is appropriately named after the “Bar Association”.
3. Look at the front page of any law suit that has been filed in America for the past seventy years and there you will have proof in your hand of both personage and barratry being committed against the individual people falsely named as “DEFENDANTS”. They are being deliberately confused with foreign estate trusts merely named after them and they are suffering the crimes of both personage and barratry.
4. Spread this explanation of the situation throughout the world. Take it to the provost marshals and the highest ranking police officers, to the sheriffs, and the deputies and the traffic cops, to the mayors, to the politicians responsible, to the bankers who have seized your bank accounts under the same false pretenses.
5. Go in large groups, peaceably, but with grim determination. Take your video cameras and tape recorders and stand ready to use Citizen’s Arrest against any public official who does not agree to assist you in shutting down the “court” system and arresting the “District Attorneys” and “judges” and others who have participated in this grotesque fraud. Demand that the bankers agree to correct their records and honor your ownership of your private property which has been deposited in their banks in good faith.
6. If any public official presented with this information refuses to help you, arrest them and hold them to face charges before a Citizen’s Grand Jury composed of twelve honest men who own land in your county. If the Sheriff of your County refuses to do his duty when confronted with this information, arrest him, and elect a new Sheriff pro tem to serve in the office until proper elections can be held.

AUG 23 2017 Visiter No.646210 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 21 2017 Visiter No.646155 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 21 2017 Visiter No.646151 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

or the pdf format here

AUG 21 2017 Visiter No.646120 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
click image to enlarge

for the pdf version click here

AUG 19 2017 Visiter No.646110 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
I am gonna make a prediction on the basis of facts and truths that i know... all these fools doing the 10 min 'utube get rid of debt shit is not a good thing .. ohh they believe they are doing a great service but i fear our enemies will be using these quick fix artists as minions to lead the sheeple into a trap ...
You think you know it all ...if you do not know what is on the other side of the wall .. so you gurus dont know shit!!!!!... you know a quick fix ... that is it ... and because you have not a fucking clue about digital signatures and authorities.. how about the IRS .. you hot shots got a clue what you are gonna do when the IRS comes calling .... ohh and they will .. cause not a single one if you has given a thought that you are stepping on toes w/out correction ...
Learn people before you take foolish actions ... these guru ach and ssn fixes are gonna be shut dowm .. not because it necessarily wrong, but for the very reason of not following through fulll picture ... THAT is why it will be shut down .... our enemies are gonna use this to trap the fools following the fools ..
No heather tucci did not wake people up.. she is setting the bait And if you dont like my words - tough shit ... i am watching a bunch of people losing their heads and acting like the incompetents the bad guys like to make us out to .... and you know what it is incompetent !!!!
Rational reasonable ones act witb due diligence not on a 10 min video ..
Ken Dost As i see it per treasury regs, put aside the bc and focus to establishing the 3 you's...
1) nonresident alien with migration to a foreign country - 98 series EIN ...I set up in luxembourg because this is where Property Data S.A.R.L. and i'll post up the documents later today to walk you down exactly why Luxembourg - 98 series name First MI Last
2) 45 series EIN with Name as an estate
3) 45 series EIN with Name as a coprooration
4) IRS 8832 FIRST MIDDLE LAST dba, FIRST MIDDLE LAST As administrator
6) IRS 8832 FIRST MIDDLE LAST dba, FIRST MIDDLE AS secured party (principal and creditor)
7) 2848 Revoking all prior and and current POA's Appointing myself as attorney in fact ...this removes the BAR between the fiction and my living man which of course is declared as creator second only to man upstairs - in prorpria persona, sui juris jus soli (on the soil)
Addtl designees to on 2848 is First Middle Last (adminstrator) First Middle Last (executor) First Middle Last (secured party)
8 ) IRS 14039 - identity theft attaching an annotated and highlighted true and correct copy of the MERS/Nb Agreement
9) IRS 8821 auuthorization to open up tax shelters attaching all 26 pages of shelters i want opened
10) revocation of pki digital signatures and of all pledges to efile by practioners (loan servicers and BAR fucks) - with this i cut these pricks off from their tax sheltering schemes
11) 3949A against MERS , FANNIE , freddie, william david dallas, ocwen, merrill Lynch, mindbox, NLMS, HSBC, Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase, and bank of America - as a preliminary leaving open to add addtl parties
AFFIDAVIT invoking Common law Several Affidavits i'll list up later
Form 56 appointing treasury irs and fiscal services as fiduciary which i allready did with my first package
revocation of franchise Affidavit of nontaxpayer exempt as foreign entity Revocation of all delaware agents principals, indentures trust agreements and directed trust Revocation of MERS /NB Resign, retire and otherwise renounce, quit, abstain, screw your damn commonwealth of virginia and all commonwealths..
I am contemplating affidavit and declaration of expatriation so no questions exist as to my virtual migration to luxembourg or status as american national ...
That is the bulk .. delivery will be to irs treasury fiscal services, oregon dept of revenue, oregon ag and governor
After that package is out i am than gonna turn my attention to ssa , customs, us coast guard DOT, HUD, FDIC and other agencies .. i could rely on treasury and irs deal with it ... BUT i want to ensure i am heard and send a message as to say to these agemcies - dudes you are 'busted' as well as to open up other paths
I am quite pleased and quite confident
Get the three yous in place with IRS and it is game over for these prick criminals ...
I am also attaching to recession i did 3 yrs ago that Ocwen ignored attached to the original true and correct original copy of deed of trust notes and riders...with a big red CANCELLED across the deed of trust attaching to it a 1099 oid and 1040es .. The riders i am endorsing fir settlement of annuities ..
I believe i am in the right in doing this
And as far as arrears own Ocwen .... fine i'll pay that offset though by a bill in equity for the development of land, timber value, water rights, my bill for design , drawing and permitting of building plans .. with value and ownership in copyright of KWD DesIGN , inc.. and a few other value added equities ...
Than i decided i should be paid for over 10 yrs of self education to uncover and unwind this shit ...that bill comes out to 3,740,000
And now it is on to the techicals and enforcement
I do not subscribe to all this ucc1 financing shit cause i want to retire and resign from trade and take my earnings and winnings... if i file a ucc1 i am no longer private yet this is how i wish to remain

AUG 17 2017 Visiter No.646056 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 17 2017 Visiter No.646040 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 17 2017 Visiter No.646038 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 16 2017 Visiter No.646004 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
14 days PASSED and NO RESPONSE from ICO

AUG 16 2017 Visiter No.646000 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 13 2017 Visiter No.645914 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
of where we are at... with regard to... &

ENGLAND says....in reply to Ken Dost -
Law Religion and Science..
as I comprehend it all birth Registrations are done through the crown of Temple B.A.R. This IS the British crown and it goes deeper than that too. B.a.r.= British Accredited Registry. Registry of births, deaths, and marriages who employs these fuckers ? The b.a.r. They are priests working for Rome.
It's Rome always has been when they wrote the religions they hid under this vail. This is how the bastards have done it in robes and shirt suit and a tie , we've been taught that this is respectable and that's what we've done over the years respected these crooks Now it's so bad people are realising that their not cracked up to what we thought, and they are having to move fast which exposes them all the more. The root is religions and this is my goal to break as many as I can from it. Once they see they've been had it makes them extremely angry the desired affect then they start checking and researching.
They own everyone’s birth cert and hire the copy write to government to bring in revenue from fools who answer to it in court . Government’s are bankrupt so trade on sea as land law forbids trading . Men are on land and land law forbids them trading with bankrupts and Piracy to enable treason . Hence Strawman And Cestui Que Vie Trust..
One needs a live born record and best of luck getting that. It also has a 7 year rule a child up to the age of 7 can get a live born record. A married couple. If one partner disappears for 7 years and no one knows their whereabouts the other partner is free to remarry. Dead after 7 years. But a marriage is a contract of two corporations coming together to produce a product. Personally I would never get married it's no good and does no one any favours
A man / woman are in the JURISTICTION of common law not Admiralty law birth cert is receipt for goods hence government use docks in private commercial courts they rely on you giving life to their paperwork your birth cert and summons is IN all CAPITALS and like you the penny takes a while to drop . If you don't announce yourself as the living you will be judged as property as the paperwork which we answer to in error our justice system provides a service based on Roman Catholic Law.
The Vatican have laid claim to all things on earth. BONIFACE THE 8TH (UNUM SACTUM) 1302 They PRESUME you are their property. UNLESS YOU TELL THEM.
Reclaim your Dominion, its your souls mission. Read the bible, then watch the GODFATHER videos, lol. CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS = CHRISTOPHER = THE BEARER OF CHRIST COLUMBUS= NAME OF THE DOVE
we have all been BAPTISTED into the catholic church. if you have a birth certificate, that is your baptism.. you was born in a hospital =military facility since the 1870s we are born in wards, we are wards of the state.
YOU are the chief executive/administrator and Beneficiary of your ESTATE aka your legal fiction. The Crown can be the trustee.
(the soul beneficiary and shareholder of your CORPORATION)
You can submit your corporate fiction to the court and be at sea.
You can Remain on land as a man and not submit your body to the court.
David Giaramita When you go to go to court today it's all about commerce the Phoenicians and commerce are connected today, the word phony when someone's called a phony it comes from Phoenicia, phonetics, language and the alphabet and it went to Greece and Rome it comes from Phoenicia the Assyrians the Babylonians and the Greeks hated the Phoenicians the Phoenicians were tin trading with England 3000 years ago set up destroyed Carthage-Italy there was many battles to destroy Tire-Phonecia) Alexander the Great Dealt with the Phoenicians the Phoenicians went to Venice they became the venetians when Rome was sacked they all went to Venice the black nobility,they found venice on the water Just like Phoenicia..on the water..
The venetians went across Europe and married into the Royal bloodlines, they had lots of bullion, then they found the Jesuits the Jesuits run the world they are guilty dogs trafficking and drug dealing the Royal monarchy is mixed up in this. A lot of blood has been spilled even the Bible says: the death of gods Witnesses the blood will go up to their nose Rome founded Paris, Rome founded London they are all roman corporations.
El london the city of the Lord or El the Sun or saturn. Paris-Swisse for isis, and what do you find in the center of Paris? well you find the notredam and who's the notredam? Isis.
Now rome is an interesting story because rome, When good old babylon was destroyed, the priesthood those Cardinals the guys dressed in red,Babylon that's the reason the whole thing's called Babylon the great.
'get out of her my people if you do not want to share with her, in her sins', because you will!!
Is a system of shit served up as freedom For you..... just get a birth certificate and join the corporation, get on the citizen-ship.
What they have done is put you on their ship. We think we have rights because we're on land we have no rights that are creator given. The Creator, The cause the one with no name unconditioned consciousness blissful that is our true nature, so why are we suffering why are we sick?
Because of this system it's got to go, the one we are going to bring down, with our consciousness and by preaching to the world, peaceful non-compliance, do not comply with these people they are phonies!
The set up a good old system, they set up a system where we have no rights anymore, do not go to court saying, i have rights and god-given rights don't do that because you haven't, you have services, services privileges and benefits. Search Black's Law Dictionary for what that means.
We are all slaves!! on a slave- ship We can have a privilege we can go to jail it is a benefit the system, much like us paying tax.
we Are enslaved... When a child is born it comes through a birth canal.
when a ship comes in from the high waters from another land which has different laws and cannot trade with another country unless it has maritime law, it comes in from the birthing canal berth (birth) and is docked. a doctor is present when a baby is born, thats the docks.
a certificate of manifest a statement of Life, here is a baby then comes the baby's birth certificate - Bonded it is certified it was a statement of Life birth..then The parents have informed of manifestations,much like the the boat's Captain gives the boats manifest to the port.
Government certified your birth certificate. Bondsman;now you are a citizen on their ship.
The waters they have put all around the planet. Around the world and see the little Watermark 2foot off the ground that little bronze strip that's the water they brought up the water.
today wherever you see these pyramids..they rule Washington DC a Monument 666 foot granite Monument. London has one...and...
Rome has the largest natural oblisc, in the middle of st. Peter's Square.stolen from Cairo by Julius Caesar.
Julian dynasty is the family that started these corporations. Julius and his adopted son Augustus where the 1st sons of gods. to rule an empire..and the republic went bye bye.
just like the Vatican did 130 years ago in America in 1881 21st February. the 1881 act, its an act - they are acting.
The US is a corporation, not the United States of America..the republic.
And the Christians have been led into thinking,its a Christian country??!!
No the Christians killed the indigenous inhabitants, converting them.to christ by the edge of the sword, putti g them into reservation camps..
Criminals the lot of them..bullies and murderers..
No redemtion at all.
Consciousness must come to save this planet.
what year did the United Kingdom come to exist?
What part does the international bank of settlements play?

AUG 11 2017 Visiter No.645882 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Now, by this unfolding catalogue of information, that is the back bone of the court dishonour and it's racketeering of legal-ease practise by jewish masonic bar banking interests to control the masses, we push the boundaries further to identify such TDA accounts, having thrown the chattels of slavery to the ground. I today served formal notice of a UCC1 financing statements in the final push to access what's rightly mine.

AUG 9 2017 Visiter No.645827 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
& BREAKFAST to start the day

AUG 6 2017 Visiter No.645733 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 3 2017 Visiter No.645645 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

AUG 2 2017 Visiter No.645612 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
2nd LETTER recorded as DELIVERED to POLICE

AUG 1 2017 Visiter No.645583 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 31 2017 Visiter No.645540 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
ALL my SUBJECT ACCESS REQUESTS have been ignored
Today we investigate after proofs of delivery

This block email to ALL parties that has also been sent recorded delivered..
BEFORE reporting the matter to the ICO [information commission office] we again provide 7 days further to respond under the subject-access-code-of-practice.pdf here for your perusal.
FAILURE to respond will invoke a block complaint to the ICO for further action.

JULY 30 2017 Visiter No.645526 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
The COLLECTED PAPERS of Frederic Maitland


JULY 28 2017 Visiter No.645490 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Read the full letter from 2013

JULY 27 2017 Visiter No.645480 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

full request here

JULY 15 2017 Visiter No.645224 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 14 2017 Visiter No.645201 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 13 2017 Visiter No.645162 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
MASONIC POLICE RESPOND but to our UK address


JULY 12 2017 Visiter No.645150 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 7 2017 Visiter No.645074 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 6 2017 Visiter No.645014 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 2 2017 Visiter No.644929 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JULY 2 2017 Visiter No.644924 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
by Diana Smith ... I am copying in watchers of this page, to my recent e-mail to the Non-Executive Chair at Land Registry ( who has replaced Mark Boyle). The UK Public are entitled to write to Land Registry's Non-Executive Chair or one of their Non-Executive Directors if Land Registry's dealing of matters is unsatisfactory. Previously writing to Dr Catherine Raines as a Non -Executive Director, resulted in my letter marked private / personal / confidential and for her attention only , was interferred with and opened by Assistant Registrar John Edon and Land Registry Head Office Staff with Dr Catherine Raines not seeing it and John Edon wrote telling me not to write to Dr Raines again. Anthony Black CEO at Intelligent Addressing wrote to me stating that Land Registry had no right directing me to not write to one of their Non-Executive Directors as this was the correct procedures in such matters. I provided accurate copy of Mr Black's letter to Land Registry' Corporate Lawyer in person to not receive any form of apology and for the matter to still not be taken up:-
From diansmt5 diansmt5@aol.comhide details
To michael.mire michael.mire@landregistry.gov.uk
Diana Smith,
Corner Farm,
Rotten Row,
Theddlethorpe St Helen,
LN12 1NX.
30 th June 2017. Dear Michael Mire ,
I draw hope from the recent rulings over The Hillsborough Disaster that have taken over thirty years to muster, and alert you to my fear that the death toll of persons targeted of their homes, that involves Land Registry, runs to many thousands. Land Registry's lead involvement together with assistance of local councils / Legal Services Commission. ( now The Legal Aid Agency) / The Staff of The Adjudicator to HM Land Registry / The Independent Complaints Review ( mostly people who have previously worked for Land Registry) and The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, amounts in my eyes to not only maladministration in public office ( punishable by up to ten years prison term) , but also vast criminisation aimed mainly at the most vulnerable of society. A senior barristers opinion sought by a campaigning body using funds raised from the UK Public and based on just three of the public domain documents l have sourced, stated that TWENTY - THOUSAND ( 20,000) COMPLAINANTS A YEAR OVER A DECADE ( TEN YEARS) , HAD BEEN GAGGED USING TWO PIECES OF GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION THAT WERE NOT DESIGNED FOR THE PURPOSE THEY WERE USED FOR. That amounts to in excess of TWO- HUNDRED THOUSAND CASES ( 200.000) of which not one ( 1 ) case to date , has received justice / redress. Land Registry staff tune in to the climate of enabling thefts of property and land, even to the point of putting persons entitled to the protections of The Equality Act 2010, at risk of becoming statistics living rough on the streets. This is reministic of the horrors inflicted on mental health patients , when there was previously the scam involving Land Registry and The National Health Service's selling off of hospitals , to dispose of mental health wards. The toll of lives vastly exceeds that of The Hillsborough Disaster , but is no less as horrific. The setting up of Land Registry was meant to be to record and register properties and land in an economic way and offer protection by way of state guarantee of title by and through Land Registry. Instead Land Registry has become a listening post for out of control and greedy Solicitor's and others. The Human Rights Act states no one can be deprived of property / land without receiving payment for it. But Land Registry when faced with having to comply with the HRA , decided to get the vast backlog of property / land thefts off their books , by setting up the AHMLR , and getting these cases under the wire by stealth. Jeffrey Littman on his chambers website exposed enough of what was happening to enable Sweet & Maxwell to investigate and publish their findings in November 2012 ( Emmett and Farrand on Title). This threw up the knowledge of it having been a dominent Land Registry together with one Commissioner Harpum ( Law Commission) , that in fact created the LRA2002, and the setting up of the AHMLR in which to get away with what was bodacious crimes against the very homeowners Land Registry were meant to protect. Misleading literature to the UK Public by both Land Registry ( ASA Adjudication 25 th July 2007 ) , followed up by more misleading literature published by the AHMLR in 2009 ( most cases referred between the two agencies took two years to occur). As a CASIA member l attended the funeral of Paulette Cooper , her death aged just 60 years of age , brought on by the theft of her hotel ( also her home) , that was stolen using a fake document with not even the required attached registration number for companies house. Paulette had managed to video the taking of her hotel and the admittance that day by Philippa Fleetwood ( Manager at Lincoln Courts) that the unlawful court paperwork being used , had been the same documents already used for the ten years years of evictions , she had at that point held her job for issuing and enforcing. I on many occassions wrote to your predessessor , pointing out his role as Non Executive Chair of Land Registry , meant he could be perceived to be liable for the many cases brought about by the maladministration in public office that was occurring. I only ever received one reply from Mark Boyle and that was to gloat and tell me l did not know what l was talking about. CASIA had four - hundred and fifty members ( 450) and many more followers being copied into their knowledge of the atrocities inflicted upon ordinary people who had become targeted of their homes. CASIA has not disapated , it's members have been absorbed into far larger groups , that are still active today. I know that Land Registry uses it's disengagement process ( not a lawful process) to seek to disempower those it has committed the most cardinal of sins against. I have much record of the sins committed against me and have researched material to support the smoke and mirrors Land Registry have relied on , when they have lied to The Home Office in 2009 , saying the land involved in my own case was not registered land . I have original documents stamped by Peterborough Land Registry on forms for registered land dated for the 3rd November 1987, within the timelines of the registration for the amount of the land , that show the access marked in red as registered land. Yvonne Owen confirmed to me on the 15 th February 2007 that this land formed part of my registered land , " according to records held there at Kingston upon Hull Land Registry". The admittal to me by Darren Corvill ( Land Registry Solicitor) regarding the telephone call Claire Graham ( CSM ) made to my acting solicitors on the 23 rd October 2007, to enable their joint actions in non - disclosure of the all crucial declarations , and it being according to him , a point in law in my favour against Land Registry, failed to include the further non- disclosure of the request for copy of my epitome of title , held at that time by these acting solicitors. I here on record state and affirm these were further restrictions being made on my legal estate / registered title, in the matter of the covenant document , which like my own conceyance document , is my property , and no one else had the right to have either of these documents. I had already previously involved both District Judge Toombs ( March 2002)and District Judge Hudson ( July 2003) and placed a lien on my documents / files , with Richard Dale ( Dale & Co Solicitors , Lincoln) on the 4 th January 2004. As l hold accurate and decisive proof to the covenant document , being my own property / document , and it having been held in my files at Dale & Co Solicitors , then l was correct to challenge it being used by Ian Robinson ( John Barkers Solicitors) and to state the conflict of interest of the document being accepted by Land Registry to enable a restriction against my home / title. Land Registry may well be able to shapeshift to get away with breaching of covenants , but not when the evidence illustrates they have been party to breaching the deeds, as is the case of Ms Graham and her allegance with Bridge Mc Farland Solicitors on the 23 rd October 2007. For the part Mr L----- played in lying already on a planning application in 1991 and then falsifying documents for a AHMLR hearing , when there is proof in his and his wife's own handwriting from 1991 , to stupify completely what was presented before Angus Andrew, and that l sent copy of the complete file for the 1991 planning application to Angus Andrew for by registered post in 2009. It is required to follow rules before engagement of claim, and yet Land Registry appear to have allowed Mr L---- in his role working for East Lindsey District Council Planning Office , to conduct his own surveying of the access / orchard, that l was only copied into by Miriam Brown ( Land Registry Solicitor) at a much later date after involvement of the AHMLR. The survey had to have been personally photographed by Mr L----- himself and the written accompanying plan by someone else , as none of the listed positions on the plan matched the taken photographs . What kind of game plan do Land Registry employ , where it is hidden and not disclosed to anyone recorded as owning the land being surveyed or even the owners of land abutting/adjoining the land being informed prior to it happening? There would appear to have been a reliance on non- challenging of the caution of the fifty - acres ( 50 acres) , to enable the paying off by giving of registered land ( access / orchard) to Mr & Mrs L---- for their contribution in spying on my telephone calls for many years , for the parties involved in the caution fraud? However l had reported the incident of a serious crime to Lincolnshire Police involving one of the cautioners on the 18 th October 1999, that would have exposed the wrong address at Land Registry and the reliance of someone else ( her) as living here. British Telecom themselves discovered the listening device on my telephone line.I received and sent back legal aid documents for the cautioner Jacquline S----in March 2000 , at which time she had already changed her name by deedpol to similar to my own name (J------- DE vere SMITH, taken from 192.com in 2000) . I sent an accompanying letter with the documents l sent back in March 2000 , addressed to the person in Land Charges ( Legal Services Commission) , l had spoken to about the matter. I also know all the documents pertaining to the non- payment of the S---'s ( Jacqueline & Colin S---l) mortgage for the years 1989- 1994 , are lodged in Alliance and Leicester Archives as the first chargee . I demand Land Registry make account of themselves to me , for their involvement in refusing to keep not only accurate records regarding my lawful and fully registered title , but also to the defamation caused to me by their holding of inaccurate records regarding myself, Yours sincerely , Diana Smith. Tel 01507 473053.diansmt5@aol.com © 2017 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved

JUNE 31 2017 Visiter No.644860 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Are You Going to Jail Because of Your Birth Certificate?
A major implication of not knowing who you are and what a birth certificate represents, can mean the difference of going to jail or not… What you don’t know CAN and will hurt you! What you say and do WILL be used against you! First, a clarification about the Ownership of the Birth Certificate. The BC is NOT the property of the governmental services corporations operating as your “E-State” and usurping the public trust you are owed. It is a Certificate of Title (like a car, boat, or cattle). This was created by your creations behind it. In the end the Birth Certificate is your property in trust. It is your “indemnity receipt” given to you in exchange for the “legal title” they have received and hold to your estate. When you present yourself in court with a certified copy of your 3 Step Authenticated Birth Certificate in hand, you hold both the legal and equitable/ beneficial title, which is the complete title to THAT name, and the certificate is your legal title to property in hand.
There can be no excuse for any judge or lawyer mistaking this fact, however to keep their money machine going based on your ignorance, they routinely contrive to continue presuming a role as executive administrator of your estate, when YOU answer as the NAME or respond as THE ALL CAPS NAME on a warrant, bill, indictment, in any capacity other than as the agent for the NAME estate at that time. You then default into becoming defendant/trustee/surety because you misidentified yourself and didn’t claim your beneficiary position… thus you lose. They get you at “hello” with that name. They then pretend to have the right to overrule you, when you are no longer acting as the lawful and adult beneficiary of your estate. Why can they do this? You volunteered to act as an incompetent and as trustee/surety for the entity, and not as a flesh and blood living being and beneficiary to your estate, the one who is holding title.
You have to know who you are and what you are doing. The court then proceeds on this basis by deliberately falsified public records and conducting a probate court as if you are dead, as someone with no rights. Do the dead have rights? NO!
You do this all to yourself by your status and standing, and conduct. The court presumes a duty to administer and take from your estate (usufruct) as it now appears unclaimed. Any “charge” (in the monetary sense), civil or criminal, is organized theft, or so it seems. Or did you actually give it to them? A gift is not theft… get it?
Therefore what they are doing is legal and proper, because you volunteered a gift, in every case. These “probate courts” (they all are actually probate – even if they call themselves, civil, criminal, etc) have been “misinformed” by YOU to the effect that you are missing and therefore are “presumed dead” by your own actions. Unclaimed and dead as if you were Robinson Crusoe – lost at sea and unaccounted for.
Acting upon this known and obviously false presumption, the judges act as “executors de son tort” as they should, and dispose of you and your property however they see fit. This unclaimed property they hold is why they can claim a bond value on the case, then go straight to wall street under the court’s trading account, and start trading bonds backed by YOUR estate. They hold something of value, so why not? (usufruct)
You failed to identify yourself as the beneficiary of your own estate, thus they presume you abandoned that property right. This happens in nearly every court case, which is why 98% of defendants (trustees by default), lose. It costs the court too much trading profit to let you win (they are Municipal Corporations with an EIN# like any other corporation).
These lower courts (State courts and US District Courts), have nothing to do with the facts or real victim based crimes. THAT is the game that is going on. This is a form of fraud known as a “Reverse Trust Scheme” in which the trustee of an estate, public or private, contrives to usurp the position of the lawful beneficiary for their own or an accomplice’s gain. But it is not a crime for them to do this if you volunteer, as most everyone does without realizing what is really going on. SO STOP DOING THAT. It is that simple.
This is all being done via the use of deceitfully similar names, e.g., John Henry Doe versus JOHN HENRY DOE. They are getting away with it because the basis of the fraud has been set up many years before, whenever you enter a courtroom with an attorney or without knowledge of the real game…. AND YOU VOLUNTEER for it. Yes, by entering with an attorney you are already abandoning your estate and admitting to being incompetent and assume the role as trustee and therefore abandoned your claim to being the sole beneficiary (you can’t be both positions in a trust).
This has all been constructed without your knowledge or consent, while you were still a baby in your cradle, and equally without the knowledge or consent of your parents. Then they spend a lifetime keeping this from you, especially now using propaganda in TV and movies and public schools to teach you how to answer to these people as SIR, and as if they are “Authorities”, when in reality they are your servants. Don’t they always tell you “to get a good attorney”? It’s all taught backwards folks. Didn’t they say in the movie “THE MATRIX 1” it is all about control (mind control). That movie is one of the few telling you what is really going on.
They have built a Prison for your Mind in order to turn you into a "Copper Top" battery. (to finance their bankrupt corporation) - By: Jeff Anderson

JUNE 29 2017 Visiter No.644845 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

As is the case of a recent HARBIN v MASTERMAN enquiry charged to my mothers estate but not only is the document concealed so to is the amount of charges, basically a masonic conspiracy to pervert justice to continue yet more fraud!

JUNE 28 2017 Visiter No.644800 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Four Unions. Two Are Bankrupt. How to Handle Obstructive Clerks
Let's go over this again.
There is the actual, factual union of fifty (50) geographically defined states of the Union. This is the "Terra Firma" level of national identity and organization that defines each sovereign state's borders and which also determines your nationality as a Wisconsinite, Virginian, Texan, and so on at birth.
There is the union of unincorporated body politics that represent and do business for the states and people composed of fifty organizations named like this: California State, Oregon State, and so on, that are member states of the United States of America. These are the doing-business-as names of unincorporated business entities organized by the people in each state to exercise the land jurisdiction and undelegated portion of international jurisdiction belonging to each state. These entities are all land jurisdiction republics.
There is a union of "inchoate" Territorial "States of States" such as the State of Illinois and the State of Wyoming, that exist only as corporate franchises of the USA, Inc. These entities are all constitutional democracies.
There is a union of equally "inchoate" Municipal "STATE OF STATES" such as the STATE OF NEW YORK, that exist only as corporate municipal franchises of the UNITED STATES, INC.. These entities are all municipal oligarchies.
And at the current moment, the UNITED STATES and all its franchises are being liquidated in Chapter 7 Involuntary Bankruptcy thanks to Mr. Obummer, and the USA, Inc. is in Chapter 11.
Separate groups of bankruptcy trustees named by the Secondary international creditors are attacking and seizing upon any and all assets of any franchises of either the UNITED STATES, INC. or the USA, INC.
This is why "JOSEPHINE MARY KENNY" is being hit with "Power to Sell Notices"--- "SHE" is being "liquidated" as a franchise belonging to the UNITED STATES, INC.
This is why "ROBERT C. BROADBENT" is being hit with "extra" property tax claims and new sales and service taxes and fees--- the trustees in charge of the USA, INC. reorganization are trying to drum up more capital.
It's simple enough once you realize what is going on. It is also simple to figure out that the only entities that aren't bankrupt and aren't subject to search and seizure, are the unincorporated land jurisdiction states like the Wisconsin State. Their members operate on the land jurisdiction under Trade Names in the form: John Albert Fisher----which look and sound identical to the names of Foreign Situs Trusts being operated in the international jurisdiction of the sea by the USA, Inc.
This simple deceit was used by FDR to deceive and defraud generations of Americans. John Albert Fisher, a Trade Name on the land,looks identical to John Albert Fisher, a Foreign Situs Trust operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
So to react appropriately to the present situation, what must one do?
Go home, E.T., go home. Home to the land jurisdiction, which is your natural and permanent domicile and the lawful domicile of all your "vessels" in trade or commerce---- the "John Albert Fisher" Foreign Situs Trust and the "JOHN ALBERT FISHER" Estate Trust and the "JOHN A. FISHER" public transmitting utility, for example, all need to have their permanent domicile "removed, re-venued, and re-conveyed" to the land jurisdiction state where you were born.
That is, this is what needs to be done, if you want to keep yourself and your assets out of the clutches of foreign secondary creditors bent on seizing your property to pay for the private debts of the UNITED STATES, INC. and the reorganization costs of the USA, Inc.
Some people have been having trouble getting knot-headed County Recorders to record their Acts of Expatriation and other paperwork. You can cut to the chase and bulwark your position and solve that problem by issuing an "Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-Conveyance of Deed"---- transferring the Deed to your names (and all the property attached to your name(s)--- back to the land jurisdiction of your home state.
Basically, the verbiage runs like this:
I, the paramount security interest holder in all assets and collateral both registered and unregistered, belonging to: JOHN MARK DOE, JOHN M. DOE, John Mark Doe, John M. Doe, John Does, their reverses, variations, and any other styles, hereby acknowledge, accept, and re-convey these same Names/NAMES to the land and soil of my native state, Wisconsin, and do establish their permanent domicile on the land and soil of Wisconsin."
Have this Witnessed in front of a notary and a couple living witnesses, then record it for posterity.
Clerks have to record deeds, including Deeds of Re-Conveyance. Pop your Act of Expatriation on as page two of the "Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Deed of Re-Conveyance" and you will have that job done, too.
And no more fights or arguments with the Clerks.

JUNE 26 2017 Visiter No.644776 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 26 2017 Visiter No.644768 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Is this THE REASON why silence falls on a POLICE fraud investigation on JEWDICIAL RACKETEERING???

JUNE 21 2017 Visiter No.644710 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

RECORDED AS delivered to PHILIP HAMMOND@TreasuryLegal


JUNE 21 2017 Visiter No.644692 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Exiting Babylon Correcting Your Status 06 19 2017

JUNE 19 2017 Visiter No.644670 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 14 2017 Visiter No.644585 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

JUNE 14 2017 Visiter No.644575 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


MAY 31 2017 Visiter No.644300 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 27 2017 Visiter No.644220 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

If the General Public wish to bring our corrupt thieving Senior Politicians and members of the House of Lords to justice PANDORAS BOX INVESTIGATIONS LIMITED has the forensic Corporate Document evidence to expose them all. TONY BLAIR, DAVID CAMERON, THERESA MAY, AMBER AUGUSTA RUDD are some of the HUNDREDS of names directly associated to Fake, Oil, Gas and Mining "Exploration" Companies launched through the abandoned Rothschilds/ Zionist/ Freemason/ Mafia International Organised Crime Mossad / CIA / MI 5 protected £billion Boiler Room 788-790 Finchley Rd and all the other Finchley Rd and UK interconnected Boiler Rooms. Let's get this started, be part of the exposure of the biggest Political corruption Scandal in British History, become a shareholder of PANDORAS BOX INVESTIGATIONS LIMITED, Contact CEO Operations Director Gordon Bowden 07949388908, David Veitch Document Data Research 07428196527, Stevie Ritchie Document Data Research 07479663242, Peter Bromfield IT & Video Capture Support 07780791339. Let Truth and Justice commence.

MAY 26 2017 Visiter No.644187 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
Donald J. Trump and Jeff Sessions 3.0
May 25, 2017
President Donald J. Trump
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500
US Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear President Trump and Attorney General Sessions:
This may be helpful to resolve--- both in terms of coming to a peaceful resolution of our intergovernmental understandings, and in terms of getting the court system in this country working as it should again. A country without justice and without an honest court system can never be great again, so let’s start there.
Back in 1994 this information passed over my desk and when a friend mentioned it to me this morning, I had reason to recall it and paw through the archives to find the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, where it says that the Attorney General is the permanent representative of INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member.
Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship. They serve no allegiance to the United States of America.
So, Mr. Sessions, where is your FARA registration lodged? And who are you working for now? And under what authority? Presumably all the “state of state” Attorney General franchises are under the same authority? And also have their Foreign Agents Registration on file somewhere?
The people who live in this country and who are supposed to be protected by you, Mr. Sessions, really want to know the answers to these questions.
Since 1999 when the bankruptcy of the United States of America settled, our actual land jurisdiction state governments operating as the Alaska State, California State, et alia, have been up and operating and have had our Notices and other paperwork on file with the World Court.
By what stretch of the imagination, then, have District Courts and the State of State organizations continued to presume that we aren’t in charge of our own business, and that we don’t have a population of our own people who never actually left their lawful standing and nation-state despite self-interested fraud by FDR and others?
As Mr. Trump recently experienced in his head-butting with the Ninth Circuit, the court system here is highly politicized, but that is actually the least of its problems.
Every time a prosecutor or a litigant plaintiff brings a charge in one of these private corporate tribunals operated “as” courts they must post a Bid Bond, and they have to post it in Good Faith--- at least according to the Securities and Exchange Commission. How is that possible, Mr. Sessions, when the majority of the cases involve parties who are not knowingly operating as corporations nor as corporate franchises?
Millions of people have been purposefully misidentified as Foreign Situs Trusts belonging to the Territorial United States and millions more have been similarly misidentified as ESTATE Trusts or Public Transmitting Utility franchise operators employed by the Municipal United States---- and this is all just self-interested fraud and bull poopy, to quote Ross Perot.
This whole situation is both illegal and unlawful, but most of all, it is immoral.
Last year, I sent out a simple Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation and an Immediate Order to Cease and Desist, objecting to the practice of personage and barratry rampant in this country. A copy of the two (2) page document is attached to this letter. It forbids the practice of using GLOSSA, otherwise known as “Dog Latin” and “American Sign Language” to misrepresent the content of legal documents that otherwise appear to be written in English and what otherwise appears to be NAMES of living people: JOHN SILAS DOE and JOHN S. DOE for example, so as to confuse the real parties of interest in these cases and claims.
The living people of the fifty (50) American states are depending on you, Mr. Sessions, to secure and respect the lawful operations of our state and county land jurisdiction courts and to ride herd on all the District Courts and Territorial State of State Courts to ensure their proper limits and operations. The abuse of the 150 year-old Reconstruction Acts by the members of the American Bar Association and members of Congress must come to an end.
There was in fact no “Civil War” ever declared by Congress and no Peace Treaty, either. All that exists in the public record are declarations made by Presidents of commercial companies and corporations. What we call the “American Civil War” was nothing but a private, illegal commercial mercenary action on our shores, and the guilty parties on both sides have milked it for all its worth.
If you are serious about making “America Great Again” we need to remember what made it great in the first place, and it wasn’t because of any Nanny State or “Democracy” or because a couple gigantic commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services cheated and defrauded their employers--- the actual states and people.
Conscripting Americans into Territorial and Municipal jurisdictions without their knowing consent, foisting PERSONS merely named after them onto them to expedite the personage and barratry scheme, and then holding them liable for the actions and debts of various governmental services corporations is a form of criminality associated with the Dark Ages – feudalism--and it has no plausible excuse for being practiced on American state soil by a foreign municipal government that is supposed to be strictly limited in scope and location to the ten square miles of the District of Columbia.
Is it possible that these many thousands of “government” employees can’t read? Or are we to understand that our employees are in rebellion against the actual Constitution and the Federal Territorial Constitution as well? If so, Mr. Sessions, it is your duty to inform Interpol and order the arrest of all those in Washington DC who are involved in this criminal plot.
As recent court actions have proven, there is no specific allowance for the Territorial United States to operate any “State of State” franchises on our soil. In view of their participation in fraud schemes meant to disinherit the people of this country and unlawfully convert our assets under color of law, hosting these State of State franchises of the Territorial United States is obviously not working out for us.
In fact, we understand that the Territorial United States surreptitiously offered our land as security for the bankruptcy of The United States of America, Inc. circa 1907, and that when the bankruptcy of that entity ended circa 1953, the color-of-law land titles were not returned to the states and the people. This is an egregious disservice that was never admitted, so it could never be straightened out. Instead, the next generation of administrators rolled our land holdings into a giant trust and pretended that the original landlords were “absent” and their locations “unknown” and assigned themselves the position of presumed beneficiaries.
Do you know how bad this stinks?
We are here, right where we have been for generations. I, for one, have requested an in-depth title search to land owed to my parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents all the way back to before the so-called “Civil War” and our family still holds title to it, though we are owed the land patent instead.
This kind of unlawful conversion of property and beneficial interest has been practiced against us--- your employers, the nice trusting people who ultimately pay for all these departments and personnel – since 1860. It’s time for it to end and for the land and land assets to come home.
Gentlemen, there is absolutely no provision for the Municipal United States to operate “STATE OF STATE” organizations on our soil and there never was. This is a blatant and unwelcome trespass upon our sovereign authority that the Territorial United States is responsible for.
We are operating our actual unincorporated businesses dba Colorado State, Florida State, et alia, that are owed to the formerly bankrupted land jurisdiction states. The World Court has been advised since 1998. The BIS has been notified since 2000. It should not be a surprise to anyone that we have pursued our inheritance and our rightful place.
We are objecting to the presence of the Municipal United States on our shores outside the District of Columbia, and if you, Mr. Sessions, are indeed operating as the chief contact with Interpol, you should be fully informed and advised that: (1) our lawful states and state courts are operating and serving the people, not any PERSONS; (2) the corporate tribunals being run as District Courts are operating in blatant fraud and it is a disservice to everyone involved that they are; (3) we have suffered long-term, blatant, purposeful attacks in international jurisdiction infringing our copyrights, entangling us improperly in bankruptcies, stealing our identities, and have suffered press-ganging, involuntary conscription, kidnapping, identity theft, enslavement, and many, many other crimes committed against us by people taking their paychecks from our pockets.
There is indeed “something rotten in Denmark” but it is not the people of this country and it is not their states of the Union at fault. Instead, the fraud since 1860 is the unique problem of the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States and it amounts to a gross Breach of Trust and violation of commercial contract which has been given Notice and Due Process for over a decade.
We are not being represented properly so it is therefore entirely necessary and proper that we present ourselves and settle our own issues.
We request that you, Mr. Sessions, take action to clean up the court system in this country. Make sure that District Courts and federated “State of State” courts are not presuming upon American state nationals who bear no responsibilities of citizenship and who are not naturally subject to the government of the Territorial United States nor the Municipal United States.
The actual people belong with us and to our states, Mr. Sessions. Only the “persons” --- most of which have been created under conditions of fraud and copyright infringement—belong to you.
We request that you, Mr. President, lean on Mr. Sessions to make sure this gets done, and that all the district courts and federated “state of state” courts operating in this country are either shut down in the case of Municipal United States STATE OF STATE operations, or rigorously required to observe their proper limitations with respect to the actual states and people in the case of Territorial United States Courts.
As the Fiduciary acting in behalf of the actual land jurisdiction states and specifically in behalf of the Colorado State and the Nevada State, I request the immediate release and return of the Bundys who are peaceful Nevada State “vessels” engaged in international trade--- Protected Persons – who have been improperly arrested and detained under false presumptions of municipal citizenship by the STATE OF NEVADA and also request the release of the Colorado State Judges who have been similarly wrongfully attacked, mischaracterized and assaulted in violation of their Constitutional guarantees by the STATE OF COLORADO--- neither one of which--- STATE OF NEVADA or STATE OF COLORADO--- have any right to be on our soil in the first place.
We have declared and are declaring to the entire Earth that our land is ours, and despite chicanery to the contrary, we are still here and still the landlords--- yes, we mean that literally. Our land. Not yours. Not the Secondaries in a fraudulent bankruptcy. Not the merely “presumed” Beneficiaries. Read it. Hear it. Know it for sure. The heirs of the American states known as American state nationals did not disappear and did not knowingly, willingly declaim their birthright inheritance, either.
You are operating the corporations that are supposed to be delivering the “essential governmental services” our states contracted to receive. You are supposedly familiar with Article IV of the agreement allowing your organizations and employees known as “citizens” to be here on Nevada State and Colorado State soil. There is no provision for these incorporated Municipal United States franchises dba STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF COLORADO to be on our soil and there is certainly no excuse for the Territorial United States allowing these foreign entities to run roughshod over the actual states and people in violation of its own contract and obligation to our national trust.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

What Is The Name of The Crime? --Unlawful Conversion
Obviously, fraud. That, surely.
But there is so much more to what has been done to us by our "Public Servants".... conscription, inland piracy, racketeering, kidnapping, press-ganging, enslavement, false presumption, false arrests, false impersonation, deliberate mischaracterization, plundering, pillaging, unauthorized hypothecation of debt, conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy against The Constitution, invasion, trespassing, copyright infringement, trademark violations, identity theft, grand theft and larceny..... I could probably go on all night, but at the root of it---- besides constructive fraud in general, there is a nagging need to nail down a razor-sharp diagnosis of what has gone on here, and in the end, after several years of ruminating about this at odd hours, I believe that Congressman Louis T. McFadden nailed it back in 1934: unlawful conversation.
Unlawful conversion of our identities and our assets has been the entire aim of the Territorial United States/Municipal United States Tag Team. We've had the British Enemy pretending to be our friend on one side, and the out-of-control Vatican Thugs on the other, conspiring together against us and against virtually everyone else's lawful government, too, because the same evils have been visited on a many other countries including most of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, India, Canada, Mexico.... another list goes on.
Unlawful conversion of our Trade Names redefining them as Foreign Situs Trusts.
Unlawful conversion of our state national standing to that of mere "citizens".
Unlawful conversion of our land patents to titles held under color of law.
Unlawful conversion of our private property to public assets.
Unlawful conversion of our government on the land to a government on the sea.
Unlawful conversion of the copyrights and trademarks we are owed.
Unlawful conversion of our private bank accounts to public "personal" accounts.
Unlawful conversion of our States to "States of States" and "STATES OF STATES".
Unlawful conversion of our public courts to private corporate tribunals.
Unlawful conversion of private civilian assets to public trust assets.
Unlawful conversion of American Common Law to English Common Law.
Unlawful conversion of public records to private registrations.
Unlawful conversion of our right to elect to mere voting privileges.
The sheer scale of this sly, secretive crime spree all across the globe is staggering, especially when one considers that it has all taken place under a banner of freedom and progress---- while in fact delivering a form of modern feudalism instead.
I wonder how long they thought they'd get away with it? And now that they are standing with their pants down around their ankles, I wonder how long they think they can still get away with it?
How long before the police forces and military wake up and do their jobs and prosecute the actual criminals?
How long before the government politicians responsible know for sure that they have been caught and have to correct, or none of us will have any reason to pay them for their "service"?

MAY 25 2017 Visiter No.644169 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
SENT as there has been no response!

MAY 20 2017 Visiter No.644087 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Remember, not only did you and I contribute to our Pension, our employer did, too. It totalled 15% of your income before taxes.
If you averaged only £15 000 over your working life, that's close to £220,500. Read that again. Did you see anywhere that the Government paid in one single penny?
We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government bank to ensure that you and I would have a retirement pension from the money we put in, it was not money that the Government had any right to spend elsewhere.
Now they've started to call the money we paid in an 'entitlement' when we reach the age to take it back.
If you calculate the future invested value of £2500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (that's less than what the govt. pays on the money that it borrows from overseas), after 49 years of working you'd have £892,919.98.
If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive £26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (that means until you're 95 if you retire at age 65) and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit!
If you bought an annuity with the money and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of £1976.40 per month.
My foot !! IT'S MY MONEY!! I paid IN cash for my pension. Just because they borrowed the money to spend on other things, that doesn't make my pension some kind of charity or handout!!
Remember MP's benefits? --- free healthcare, outrageous retirement packages, 67 days paid holidays, three weeks paid holidays, unlimited paid sick days.
Now that really should be called welfare entitlements, yet they have the nerve to call my O A P retirement payments entitlements? We're "broke" and the government can't help our own OAPs, our ex-service personnel, our orphans or our homeless
Yet in the past few years we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, Turkey, India, Pakistan, etc., etc., etc. Literally, BILLIONS of Pounds !!!
But they can't help our own citizens!
Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed old age pension have to beg social services to receive additional aid, while our government and religious organizations pour hundreds of billions of £££ tons of food to foreign countries!
They call the old age pension an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for us to collect, the government is running out of money.
Why did the government borrow from it in the first place? It was supposed to be in a securely locked box, not to be used as part of the Government's general funds.
Sad, isn't it, that some people won't have the guts to forward this. I'm in the category with guts enough to do it - - - and I just did.
I hope some of you will do the same.

MAY 16 2017 Visiter No.644011 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 14 2017 Visiter No.643980 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 13 2017 Visiter No.643960 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 12 2017 Visiter No.643940 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 12 2017 Visiter No.643935 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 11 2017 Visiter No.643932 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 10 2017 Visiter No.643900 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

The 1st letter had this problem so I despatched another and now that too has the same problem?? Something fishy going on... and so now I have an agent that will deliver by hand to serve onto the treasury seeing as the royal mail seem on the face of it to not be able to deliver.
reply 13.5.2017

MAY 10 2017 Visiter No.643885 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 8 2017 Visiter No.643830 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Who or What Is At the Bottom of All This?
Queen Victoria and Benjamin D'Israeli
The British Crown and the Dutch East India Company
The Great Abomination, aka, Semiramis, aka, Mystery Babylon
The Office of the Roman Pontiff
The Tax Collectors of the Pontifex Maximus -- aka Bar Associations
Clueless, Corrupt Politicians
Clueless, Corrupt Military Leaders
In more or less that order.......
At a certain point, it becomes a circular argument, because all these maladies are linked.
Satan, the Father of All Lies, the Great Deceiver, has been hard at work deluding and misleading people for thousands of years and he has had a real hay-day here thanks to our gullibility.
Queen Victoria and her favorite Prime Minister, Benjamin D'Israeli opened the ancient Pandora's Box of Evil Tricks and Babylonian Bullshit in order to finance the Raj in India and that whole debacle.
The British Crown and the Dutch East India Company Heirs have been colluding and fighting each other by turns for the last three centuries and have been causing nothing but trouble on a worldwide basis since they started indulging in the fruits of Institutionalized insurance fraud circa 1702.
Semiramis, the Queen of Sumeria and wife of Noah's Grandson, Nimrod, also known as The Great Abomination and Ashtoreth and Astarte and Isis and Cybele -- started her own religion based on infanticide, tree worship, sex as a sacrament, and idolatry which included the use of graven images and symbolic coins as money shortly after the Great Flood. [This venal religion known as Mystery Babylon is also known as Satanism and practices ritual sacrifice of children and deliberate subterfuge and secrecy. It basically promises its members secret knowledge and then gets them into compromised positions via sex and drugs and participation in ugly things and then simply blackmails them and threatens them to go along with whatever the leaders want done.]
The Office of the Roman Pontiff --- the Church has been trying to serve two masters ever since the Council of Nicea --- and this is reflected in the Pope trying to hold two offices at once, one sacred and one profane. The Office of the Roman Pontiff is the secular, pagan, and profane office. No man should be placed in such a position, but that is what has gone on.
The Pontiff or Pontifex Maximus as the Romans called him two centuries before the birth of Jesus was a deal maker and breaker, the literal "bridge" between jurisdictions under the Lex Mercantoria, the Magician responsible for the creation of poppets now known as corporations and "legal fiction persons". This is why Francis is responsible for the wrong-doing of all these corporations and why, under ecclesiastical law, the Pope retains the ability to change, repeal, or annul any corporate law or decision. He literally holds the charter of all incorporated entities on Earth--- C Corps, S Corps, LLC's, trade unions, cooperatives, foundations, trusts--- you name it, and at the end of the day, all these things have been created by and are the responsibility of the Roman Curia. So when things go wrong and commercial corporations start mercenary wars and pass oppressive "legislation" --- don't even pause. Head straight to Rome and start banging your dishes on the floor like angry dogs.
Tax Collectors of the Pontifex Maximus -- the Bar Associations. Also since the Second Century BCE, the Pontifex Maximus has employed peculiar tax collectors: priests of Cybele (See Mystery Babylon comment above; "Cybele" is another name for Semiramis.) who wore black robes and white wigs and who practiced their own peculiar twisted form of writing (cursive as in "cursing") and their own equally twisted form of language today known popularly as "legalese" or the "language of fraud".
All the above have combined with clueless and corrupt political and military leaders to result in The Great Fraud and The Mess which the world is currently facing up to.

MAY 6 2017 Visiter No.643810 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 6 2017 Visiter No.643800 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

UNDERstanding identity theft pdf here

MAY 5 2017 Visiter No.643770 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 1 2017 Visiter No.643655 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

MAY 1 2017 Visiter No.643650 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 29 2017 Visiter No.643626 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 29 2017 Visiter No.643620 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 28 2017 Visiter No.643605 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
RECORDED DELIVERY sent principlesecuredparty.pdf

APRIL 27 2017 Visiter No.643590 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Pass the Word to Mr. Trump
The Fruits of Endless War -- How Insurance Fraud Funds "Your" Government(s)
Let me say it again for the benefit of all those still asleep: there is
(1) the actual United States composed of fifty (50) independent sovereign nation-states which are geographically defined,
(2) the Territorial United States which only exists on paper composed of (57) fifty-seven incorporated "States of States" such as the State of Washington, and
(3) the Municipal United States which also exists only on paper composed of (57) fifty-seven incorporated "STATES OF STATES" such as the "STATE OF OHIO".
Unfortunately, the perpetrators of this grand fraud were allowed to create these shadow "states" via the loop-hole provided by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 giving the Congress the plenary right to govern the District of Columbia. So they have. They set up shop for themselves in 1864 and have been operating as a crime syndicate ever since. They have played no end of semantic deceits and made false claims against you and your assets (a process called "hypothecating debt") and have indulged in constructive fraud and kidnapping and racketeering and inland piracy at your expense.
As if paying for three levels of government was not enough, the vermin are presently trying to saddle you with a fourth tier of useless eaters---"Regional Government" under "UN" auspices. I say that because government produces nothing but more government, therefore, if anyone is to be discarded as "useless eaters", I suggest that it be the bankers and politicians and government workers first in line for permanent lay-offs.
Soon, if this cancerous and fraudulent process of endlessly proliferating government is not stopped, a very tiny segment of the productive population will be laboring day and night to support unproductive government workers and government dependents and all sanity will be turned upside down and on its head. You will literally be the slaves of your "public servants".
This is the backdrop for today's subject matter --- the vast insurance fraud that has been used since 1702 as the means to fund government and also the reason why we have endless war in our midst.
The first scam is to seize upon you and your estate while you are still a helpless baby in your cradle. The liars pretend that you have been "abandoned" at the hospital and that your Mother is a mere "informant"--- turning you over as a ward of their "State of State" organization.
Now that they have a false claim to work from, they take out a life insurance policy on their "ward" to profit themselves in the event of your death. This guarantees that whatever they may have to spend on you--- which is usually nothing thanks to your gullible parents--- will be returned with profit upon your demise.
Your entire estate--- your name, your body, your assets and even your rights--- are all rolled over into an ESTATE trust benefiting yet another level of government. This trust is set up as a generation skipping trust and your "State of State" Guardians obligingly agree (on your behalf and for your own good, of course) that you "agree"---- without ever actually agreeing or even knowing about all this crap going on in the background--- to "donate" all your worldly goods and assets to this generation skipping trust and to forego all benefit yourself.
That's how all YOUR contributions to the IRS become characterized as "gift and estate taxes".
Now obviously, when you die it is pay off time for the government criminals responsible for this "System". Thirty days after YOUR Death Certificate is issued they make a Claim on Abandonment against your ESTATE and they seize it for their own benefit. They also collect on YOUR life insurance policy.
So now you know why war is so profitable and why it has been constantly perpetuated by the fiends occupying Rome, the City of London, District of Columbia, and the United Nations City State, all of which are owned and operated by three groups of Satanists, most of whom pretend to be Jews "but are not Jews, but a Synagogue of Satan" to quote Jesus.
How to end it? Well, there are relatively few of them and a great many of us. If we wise up and refuse to play their ugly games they are shit out of luck. If we grab the politicians by both ears and bang our dishes on the floor like angry dogs the fear of the electorate will eventually win out over their other base instincts.
Reform of the entire insurance industry so as to put an end to profiting from death is a start. Refusing to sign any paperwork for any hospital ever again is another. (Did you know that your dead cadaver is worth $11.4 million USD???) Suing the rats in international court venues and operating our own Federal Postal District Courts to do it, without employing any Bar Association Members, is another.
Educating your friends, family, and neighbors is of paramount importance, as well as getting your own political status firmly declared in public record. Organizing your county and state jural assemblies comes next. Signing up and serving your state militias (as opposed, of course, to any "state of state militias" which are illegal commercial mercenary forces) is another big step in the right direction.
Any decent man or woman who holds a Bar Card should tear it up in little pieces, throw it down the toilet, and come join our "Living Law Firm". I say that not as a merely moral judgment, but as a practical prescription. If the Bar Members themselves don't see why this hideous crap has to stop---and take immediate steps to end it ---- they will be the first ones to go.
Talk to your insurance companies and cancel your policies. Chances are you are just paying to protect property that a foreign government is pretending to own after lying and saying that you (or your false Guardians at the State of State office) donated your ESTATE to them.
Outright slaughter of those responsible has been suggested, but that just plays into the hands of the vermin in back of it all. Remember--- those people, the ones actually and factually behind all this, don't care if it is a hospital administrator who dies for condoning and participating in this crime against humanity, or a Congressmen who is strung up in his hometown as an accomplice to it, or an innocent baby who is murdered as a consequence of it. All they care about is the fact that somebody dies, and they get a big pay off as a result.
So, my dears, in approaching this scenario, it is very important to keep your tempers and to be cold as ice and to be determined as steel that this entire "System" is going to be identified and destroyed--- root, stem, and leaf.
Keep calm and get even. And get going. Now. Today.
All evidence suggests that Donald Trump is being fed a line of absolutely unconscionable nonsense. He is being told that the "government of the United States" is insolvent--- and that much is---artificially-- true; what he isn't being told is that all the money he needs is in fact at his command and that the entire insolvency, National Debt, etc., is only an appearance being created by dishonest bookkeeping.
What he also isn't being told is that he has no need for Israeli debt or Rothschild credit, because these banks are only middlemen. He can go straight to the source and dispense with all the negotiations and demands and offers of these Third Party interlopers.
With his help, we can take back what rightfully belongs to America and Americans, who will then naturally assist him in his endeavors to make America Great Again instead of swaggering around beating other innocent nations senseless.
For starters, he can stop trying to drum up business by dropping bombs in Afghanistan and missiles in Syria and rattling sabers against North Korea.
He can realize that his entire problem is with dishonest banks and dishonest bookkeeping and order--- as Commander in Chief --- a competent external audit. Once that happens it will be painfully apparent to everyone that the "United States" is not really broke and that vast bank-inspired bankruptcy fraud has been committed instead. The Puerto Rican Electrical Utility they are bankrupting to use as a pass through siphon is another case in point.
It will also be apparent that the only reason we are having any trouble with Syria, North Korea, and Iran is that they are the only sizeable countries left on Earth that are not hobbled unto death by a Central Bank in the Vatican Bank stable.
Yesterday, in "The Fruits of Endless War-- How Insurance Fraud Funds "Your" Government(s)" it was fully explained how you are being defrauded and how insurance fraud related to insurance annuities and generation skipping trusts and false claims of guardianship are used by crime syndicates masquerading as governments to pick your pockets clean. It was also explained how they have made death into Big Business benefiting themselves and why it is to everyone's benefit --- everyone on Earth --- to get rid of this fraud and those perpetuating it.
As long as death by any means equals profit for anyone, we will have motive for crime that results in death---- whether it is poisoning the food or the water, vaccinating us with poisons, polluting our air with chemtrails, or causing senseless wars.
So Job One for Mr. Trump, the Pope, the Queen, and every other muckety-muck you can lay your hands on, is to put an end to the entire insurance fraud industry and the entire motive to profit from the death of innocent people by any means at all.
We also explained how all this graft is creating cancerous growth of government and layers upon layers of government employees and government dependents that are sucking the entire world economy dry without producing anything but more government.
Tell Mr. Trump the truth. Make him responsible for knowing it, whether he acts upon it or not. Tell Mr. Putin, too. And Prince William. And the Lord Mayor of London. And your local police chief. And the commander at your local Air Force base. Tell the local Cardinal Archbishops and the Pope. Just give them a copy of "The Fruits of Endless War -- How Insurance Fraud Funds "Your" Government(s)" and suggest that it is time to find another way of living, being, and operating a government. It's time for all the fraud, deceit, and cooked books to end. It's time for the motive to murder for profit to end. In fact, full stop, it's time for a whole new world to begin.

APRIL 27 2017 Visiter No.643580 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 26 2017 Visiter No.643551 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

Nemo iudex in causa sua- Natural Justice, Conflict of Interest, Administrative Tribunal
No ‘person’ can judge a case in which he or she is party or in which he/she has an interest. "The maxim that no man is to be judge in his own case should be held sacred. And that is not to be confined to a cause in which he is a party, but applies to a cause in which he has an interest.... Nemo judex in causa sua is a Latin phrase that means, literally, "no-one should be a judge in his own cause." It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest. The rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: "Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done". "This will be a lesson to all ... tribunals to take care, not only that in their decrees they are not influenced by their personal interests, but to avoid the appearance of labouring under such an influence."
Her Majesties Courts and Tribunals ‘Service’ HMCTS in Safety Partnerships / Multi Agency Partnerships. ? Possible bias or vested interests?
"As a general principle, this is not permitted in law because the taint of bias would destroy the integrity of proceedings conducted in such a manner."
One early case was Wright v Crump in which the Mayor of Hereford, England, circa 1790, claimed title to a local house. So he arranged with a friend to lease the real estate to him and then that friend brought a legal action for ejectment of the occupants before, well, Lord Mayor himself, who found for the claimant. The occupants appealed the decision to the Court of King's Bench and the Mayor, sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
Frome United Breweries Co. v Bath, [1926] AC 586
Wright v Crump, 2 Ld. Raym. 766; also at 92 E.R. 12 (1790). Cited in Franklin F.
This article explores various aspects of the No-Bias rule in Constitutional Justice. There are three types of bias, namely subjective bias, presumed bias and apparent bias. Four different aspects of the No-Bias rule will be examined in this article. Firstly, the area of subjective bias and its use in the law today will be explored. Secondly, the argument that presumed bias should be adopted in this jurisdiction will be examined. Thirdly, the competing tests for apparent bias will be analysed. Finally, the idea of the „reasonable observer‟ in the current test for apparent bias will be examined and discussed.
Regularly invoked by the Supreme Court in diverse contexts, the maxim nemo iudex in sua causa—no man should be judge in his own case—is widely thought to capture a bedrock principle of natural justice and constitutionalism. I will argue that the nemo iudex principle is a misleading half-truth. Sometimes rulemakers in public law do and should design institutions to respect the value of impartiality that underlies the nemo iudex principle. In other cases, they do not and should not. In many settings, public law makes officials or institutions the judges of their own prerogatives, power, or legal authority. Officials or institutions may determine their own membership, award their own compensation, rule on the limits of their own jurisdiction, or adjudicate and punish violations of rules they themselves have created.
Judgment - In Re Pinochet continued ... The principle is expressed in the maxim that nobody may be judge in his own cause (nemo judex in sua causa).
Regina v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2); HL 15 Jan 1999
Keep in mind that HMCTS are in safety partnerships with multi agencies , give this serious consideration and hold them to their constitutions.
Nemo Judex In Sua Causa: A Man Shall Not Be A Judge In His Own Cause
If we examine the transcript of the online version of R v Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate ex parte Pinochet (No 2) [1999] 2 WLR 272 we find the following reasoning by Lord Hutton who agreed to the appeal. Lord Hutton states:
I find persuasive the observations of Lord Widgery C.J. in Regina v. Altrincham Justices, Ex parte Pennington [1975] 1 Q.B. 549, 552F:
There is no better known rule of natural justice than the one that a man shall not be a judge in his own cause. In its simplest form this means that a man shall not judge an issue in which he has a direct pecuniary interest, but the rule has been extended far beyond such crude examples and now covers cases in which the judge has such an interest in the parties or the matters in dispute as to make it difficult for him to approach the trial with the impartiality and detachment which the judicial function requires.
Accordingly, application may be made to set aside a judgment on the so-called ground of bias without showing any direct pecuniary or proprietary interest in the judicial officer concerned.

"Before you were born, the bankers operated a scam intended to rob all members of the 'general public'. They removed all forms of money and replaced it with worthless notes which read "I promise to pay the bearer..." with another worthless bank note (FIAT Currency).
They then managed to do away with the Government and replace is with groups of commercial companies which they own. They cunningly named these companies so that they 'look' like Government. They took over the printing of the worthless bank notes with their private company called "The Bank of England" which is meant to sound like a Government Organisation, although it MOST DEFINITELY is NOT.
The next step, in their 'lets be honest here' quite clever plan, was to get their company which sounds like the Government, to ask their other company "The Bank of England" to print them lots of (worthless) money and to charge interest on that money, over and above the face 'value' of the Currency. This excess interest amount is called "The National Debt" in order to fool ordinary people into believing that their Country some how owes somebody large amounts of money.
So FIRSTLY, there is really NOTHING owed at all. SECONDLY, there IS no money. THIRDLY, the Country does not owe anything, and in the unlikely event that there were a genuine debt, then it has nothing to do with ordinary people any way as it is just a notional debt incurred by one commercial company to another commercial company! (ALL owned by the same people)
This supposed debt has been boosted over the years to a ridiculous level which could NEVER, EVER be paid off, and you will no doubt be glad to learn that all income tax is now paid to the owners of these commercial companies. Isn't it great to be paying vast sums of money to a commercial company which has never done ANYTHING for you and which holds you in utter contempt because you havent discovered their SCAM and continue to pay lots of ridiculous taxes, fee's and charges! None of which, by the way, you have to pay at all! All combined, these charges amount to nearly 80% of a persons earned income!
Do you enjoy living on one fifth of what you COULD have HAD!?
Anyway, to strengthen their SCAM, they have invented a Language of Lies called 'Legalese' or 'Legal Terminology' where they have 'GET THIS!'...changed the meanings of ordinary English words in order to Abuse & Rob ordinary members of the public!
They have set up yet another company called "The Law Society" to train up unscrupulous people in their methods of madness, lies and deception. Their commercial company which pretends to be the Government, keeps inventing new 'Statutes' which they 'pretend' are Laws (and are MOST DEFINITELY NOT) and they keep this game up by telling everybody that " THEY MUST OBEY THESE LAWS" and they have even subverted Police Men & Police Women into 'Police Officers' and convinced them that they have to enforce these Statutes.
The primary aim of these Statutes is to take banknotes, goods and property from members of the public who have not yet discovered that it is a scam being run 'secretly' against them. Many Police Officers are probably themselves ignorent of the fact that Statutes are purely optional and NO 'Human' is actually bound by them.
SO what you decide to do is entirely up to yourself. You can continue to give away most of your income to fund people who want to take, harm & steal from you OR you can decide to step 'outside' this corrupt system we are almost forced to be living in, and stop paying these people. ALL humans are born equal, so there is nobody who has the RIGHT to order you around, unless you agree to give them that right (By Consent) Acts & Statutes can be given the 'FORCE' of Law, only with Consent. SO DO NOT CONSENT.
The choice is yours to make BUT Knowledge is Power - UK has already made that choice, and that choice is FREEDOM from a Government that cant GOVERN.
SO THERE YOU HAVE IT! - Knowledge is Power - UK."

APRIL 24 2017 Visiter No.643512 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 23 2017 Visiter No.643500 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
How to Correct Your Political Status and Why
Chances are you aren't obligated to be considered any form of federal Municipal CITIZEN nor as a federal Territorial Citizen, but you have been entrapped in a profit-making scheme that pretends that you have knowingly and willingly agreed to act as a volunteer federal employee--- specifically, as a "Withholding Agent" -- a Warrant Officer in the Merchant Marine Service, and that you have purposefully and knowingly enrolled in the Social Security program which is only available to federal employees in order to receive benefits from the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) which was organized in the wake of the Civil War for welfare relief of former plantation slaves.
What? You never worked a day for the federal government? You were never told that "Social Security" is only for federal employees and dependents? You aren't a former plantation slave? You never got any benefits?
Well, then, you have to stop calling yourself any kind of "US citizen" --- because citizens all work for the government. They have a duty and obligation to obey every statute, code, and whim of the government as a result, and they are also liable to pay federal income taxes. You also have to stop voting in any "US elections" including "State of State" elections, because the States of States are just local franchises of the federal corporation(s) defined at 28 USC 3002 (15).
So, Step One--- withdraw and rescind any and all applications and enrollments as a "registered voter". You have no natural interest in the elections of a foreign corporation that you don't work for, right?
If you don't get a paycheck direct from the federal government and you don't want to function as a for-free Withholding Agent and aren't interested in any "benefits" that you pay for yourself and don't want to be held subject to the whims of a foreign entity that is supposed to be providing you with Good Faith Service instead-- then read on.
You have been mis-characterized and defrauded and you have prima facie evidence of that readily available. You think of it as your Birth Certificate, but it isn't. It is a "certification" that a federal MUNICIPAL "PERSON" was created and named after you and that at one point in your life you were a real American. You were born on your birthday, but the MUNICIPAL PERSON has a birth date which is several days or weeks later---the filing date shown on the certificate.
Please note that the "Birth Certificate" is printed on bond paper. It is a security instrument. Please also note that it has been signed by the Registrar --- an officer of the probate court. This is prima facie evidence that your earthly estate was probated when you were only a few days or weeks old and that it was seized upon by the State of ___________ or STATE OF_________ and operated for its benefit from that time on.
So, Step Two---- ditch the federal MUNICIPAL PERSON and the responsibilities and obligations associated with it.
You need to get the Birth Certificate authenticated if that is still possible in your state, or certified, if not, and then you need to endorse it and "surrender" it to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
(Please note the two dots between the "U" and the "S"----- the U.S. Treasury.) and make Steven T. Mnuchin the Fiduciary responsible for IT.
The endorsement is simple but exact. The authenticated or certified Birth Certificate that the birth State Secretary of State sends back to you will have a cover page riveted or hard stapled and firmly attached to the front of the BC. You leave that cover page attached and on the front of the BC itself in the upper left hand corner and in red ink you write: "Accepted by Drawee" and sign it by: Your Upper Lower Case Signature, and date it.
Then turn the BC over and on the back anywhere write: Pay to the Order of the United States of America, U.S. Treasury. Without Recourse. And again, write--- by: Your Upper and Lower Case Signature, and date it.
Next comes the Form 56, which is the IRS Form called "Notice of Fiduciary Relationship". This is your Notice to Mr. Mnuchin that you are making him and his office responsible for the PERSON named after you.
The Form 56 is very simple -- the name of the PERSON is the NAME on the BC which you are returning to the Treasury.
The name of the Fiduciary is Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury. You can look up the address online. I believe it is 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220.
Section A (f) --- "Other" -- Public Commercial Trust Administration
Section B(4) -- Check (a) (b) and (h) "Other" and just say, "All forms that may be necessary".
On the back, Part II, 7 (C) "Other" --- Surrender of federal "PERSON" to U.S. Treasury
On the back, Part III "Court and Administrative Proceedings" --- enter the name and address of the agency issuing the BC. The "date proceeding initiated" will be the File Date which is never your birthday, but a few days or weeks later. The "docket number" will be the State File Number on the BC. The time will be the time you were actually born, and the place of "other" proceedings will be "usa".
On the back, Part IV, "Signature" ---- you write the word "by" like a by-line to a newspaper story---- by: Your Name (Upper and Lower Case), Authorized Representative, and the date.
Underneath the Signature is a blank space. It is appropriate to say that you wish to be indemnified against claims or losses under the sovereign usa Private Registered Indemnity Bond AMRI00001 RA393427640US.
This is basically a bond posted in behalf of all the actual states of the Union and all the people living in those states insuring them against any further claims related to the MUNICIPAL PERSON(S) they have surrendered back to Mr. Mnuchin.
And that is that. You have now surrendered the MUNICIPAL "CITIZEN" back whence it came and you have insured yourself against any further claims or losses or charges brought against that PERSON.
Along with the Form 56 you should include a brief letter stating that it is your instruction to operate exclusively under 100% commercial liability and without benefit of any limited liability or other benefit of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT).
You are going to send this package of documents via Registered Mail to the Treasury. Each red and white Registered Mail label (available with instructions at all Post Offices) is unique and has an alpha-numeric identifier to track it. This includes a nine-digit number that is compatible with the federal system. As part of your assignment letter, instruct Mr. Mnuchin to open a Treasury Direct Account with that number and to please inform you when it is open for business. Also ask him to settle all debts and charges related to YOUR NAME and deposit the remainder and all other credits owed into the new Treasury Direct Account.
Thank him for his time and attention.
Well, that was a Royal Pain and you shouldn't have ever been entrapped and obligated by your employees in the first place, but now you have taken action to sever the presumption that you are volunteering to act as a federal MUNICIPAL CITIZEN, and nobody can say otherwise. From now on, "IT" is Mr. Mnuchin's problem and you are indemnified against any further claims or complaints related to "IT".
Step 3.... Notify both the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service at Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 480, Holtsville, New York, 11742-0480 and the Internal Revenue Office of the Commissioner, Room 3000, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20204-0002, that you have retired from all presumed federal service and you are revoking your election to pay federal income taxes effective October 1 of 2016. Send these Notices via Registered Mail, too. Save a copy and the mailing receipts and the Green Card Return Receipt Requested for your Eternally Done and Over File.
No more Voter Registration, no more obligation to file Federal Income Taxes and no Municipal United States PERSON for the US DISTRICT COURT -- that is, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT COURT to address.
That much is done and over.
But there's more.
You also have to rebut and return the allegation of Territorial United States Citizenship. You do this by recording an Act of Expatriation.
This is as simple as saying that your allegiance is to the soil of your native birth state, say, Louisiana, and that you act only as a private American state trading vessel and birthright member of the unincorporated private trade association doing business as The United States of America.
Now, no matter what kind of word-smithing and duplicitous redefining of terms that goes on forever afterward, no incorporated entity or franchise of any incorporated entity can claim that you are operating as a Foreign Situs Trust belonging to them or abandoned for their benefit---- which was FDR's fraudulent claim against Americans in 1933.
You have declared that at home you are living on the land and at sea your Name is an American vessel engaged in international trade--- not subject to federal regulation of commerce and owed all the protections of the actual Constitution and treaties backing it.
So now they have no grounds to "presume" that you are a Territorial United States Citizen, either.
X and X.
Finally, the rats have created "International Organizations" and run them "in your name". You need to seize upon these organizations and file liens against them. You do this using a UCC-1 Financing Statement Form. The organizations doing business as your FIRST MIDDLE LAST and FIRST M.I. LAST are the DEBTORS and your non-Territorial Lawful Trade Name (aka Christian Name-- First Middle Last) is the Secured Party. This is not a Notice of your interest, because you have already given plenty of public notice. You can lien these organizations directly by checking the "Non-UCC" claim in Box 6.
When filling out the UCC-1 Form be sure to write the names in the proper style. Everything related to the DEBTORS including USA should be in all capital letters. Everything related to the Secured Party should be Upper and Lower Case, except that for the Secured Party it should be "usa" --- the actual organic states.
And now, finally, you have provided your employees with a fistful of paperwork refuting all their lies and presumptions about you. They can no longer presume anything about your political status, except that it is private and that you are operating lawfully and without any obligation to them or their organization. Quite the opposite--- they are in fact your employees and obligated to you.
Your final stop should be the State Secretary of State's Office to present him with another copy of "your" authenticated/certified BC.
I want you to stare that man or woman right in the eye and say: "This is prima facie evidence of a Public Trust....."
If necessary, continue on----- "and also prima facie evidence of intent to defraud."
"I have reclaimed my birthright political status and I want the proper passport I am owed. If you aren't authorized to issue it, get on the phone and find out who is." If they attempt to drag you into one of their courts ask them where they will find the authority to address you? And where will they find a jury of your peers?
The Great Fraud is over. The international trustees responsible for this Mess know that it is. You know that it is. It is just a matter of time before the whole world wakes up and goes---- WT.....?

APRIL 23 2017 Visiter No.643490 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

This post serves two purposes one to address Winston Shrout being convicted in and Oregon Court yesterday and to address comments by one named SALLY ANN, who I have just blocked for rablerousing comments to may page stating I am harming people with the information I am making public.
Again this is a matter that comes down to establishing a clear line of facts and truth...
Where does one get facts and truths and who to believe and not to believe. I am not asking that anyone believe, I ask that people look to the facts and truths for themselves so they have a clear understanding of what it is they are doing before taking any action. This is why I so adamantly speak out about following gurus......
It is why when people ask me what the 1 2 3's are I hesitate in details because you have to know and understand what it is you are doing ....you have to make those decisions and doing so on the word of a guru is not smart.
What are the facts and truths and where might they be found.....The facts and truths lay in patents, copyrights, and trademarks....I can point to the facts and truths but you have to study and get it straight in your own mind.
Everything we are dealing is rooted in Intellectual properties and I can say this because I can show prove and demonstrate this. Winston was not to keen of Federal government, I am quite the opposite. The Federal government, Fiscal Services, Treasury, IRS, SEC, FINRA, CBP and other agencies are there to assist us if we come to them properly positioned.
Everything we are dealing with is rooted in Intellectual properties and I can say this because I can show prove and demonstrate this. I can lay down the patents that prove we were deceived into believing something other that what actually is. I can show how Trademarks have been used to conceal intentional trespass upon unregistered copyright. I can show how the Uniform Business Entities Act is the BAR playbook to unlawfully change our status so those who are intent on doing us harm can conceal accruing wealth trusts and accounts, and the procedure for 'domesticating' us when they decided to initiate wrongful foreclosure......oh and don't forget to destroy records if caught.....It is all right there spelled out in the Uniform Act.
I can show prove and demonstrate how the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act is used to force abandonment of property behind our backs through and by wrongful foreclosure which aligns perfectly to with Trust and indenture agreements of Wells Fargo, HSBC, Merrill Lynch that describes in explciit detail BAR attorneys take in fabricating 'will-be-debt opinions, how our signatures are forged onto fake and fabricated documents, and how the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act is to be utilized.
I can show prove and demonstrate through various trademark agreements and assignments how you and I gave permission as grantors and guarantor collateral for pleasures of legal representatives and their associates......that is damn near a quote as well......
I can show prove and demonstrate the MERS/NB is an intentionally concealed agreement of involuntary servitude and that MERS is completely misrepresented in the Fannie/Freddie mortgage loan documents.......This is an easy one to show, prove, and demonstrate........
I can show prove and demonstrate we have been deceived on a massive scale with more evidence than you can choke a chicken with......if this Sally Ann is attempting to make a case that I am giving legal advice or practicing law without a license, I say you are full of it because codes and statutes are not law rather a set of fixed administrative processes......
and what of court procedure.....is someone practicing law without a license by warning others that are no aware the court is a kangaroo admin process not a court of justice. .....If someone were to say that I am practicing law without a license by sharing truth and facts that the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over a wrongful foreclosure to which you were made to believe is a court of justice when in fact it is being concealed from folks that this all administrative and you are being denied first amendment rights, equal protection and due process by not being informed you have admin processes to exhaust because those who are licensed to practice law have blatantly lied.
We have a world that is upside down folks.......a world based on deception and lies.......it is disgusting and reprehensible...I get that folks are desperate for answers and remedy, but for God sakes do not blindly follow gurus like Winston Shrout, always always verify the facts yourselves - understand what you are doing, do not act on what others are doing otherwise.
I am confident the direction I am taking and admittedly yes advocating but I do not want for one minute someone to follow blindly without full understanding what and why you are doing you are doing. From where i stand these matters are not difficult, but i can say that with clear eyes and confident mind, because I have analyzed and studied this from every angle possible. And I do not like going into a dark cave without a torch to see my way.
Take for instance bonds and bills of exchange.....neither one I have ever been comfortable with and with the conviction of Shrout my suspicion has been confirmed. Shrout missed a couple of items related to trade and patents and that proved crucial, just as those who divorce themselves from the US Corp, yet still make claim to having assets held by the corporation they want not part of folks missed the 1790 Copyright Act......recognizing this act makes everything they are doing incorrect and in the wrong direction.......my opinion of course, you need to look for yourself and either find agreement or not ....
Winston screwed up, in my learned opinion, using the wrong form of instrument.....not bills of exchange rather it should be bills of lading .....big big big big huge difference....
As for all the Sally Ann's out there, don't come onto my pages and accuse me of harming people by putting out facts and truths so they may learn HOW they have been harmed and how they may help themsleves from being further harmed.....If you are going to troll my pages at least do so with some intelligence and accusations that hold up to scrutiny......The people that visit and frequent my pages are not stupid, confused perhaps, but not stupid. while others are quite intelligent.....These are a great group of people whom I admire greatly for taking initiative to very complex issues........No I cannot answer everyone's questions and yes i sense the frustration of some, but I cannot possibly answer everyone's questions ....to this I rely on those who are gaining understanding to help others along.......
Know this though the light emanates from one direction one path and that is Intellectual properties through the doors of specific and certain federal agencies.......If this seems contrary to what many are believing ........i get it....as I once believed the same...until I learned what I had learned all these years was based upon deception........it is a conclusion that each individual one needs to arrive at themselves.....or not......
Ok. so this posting is more a mish mash of thoughts.....

APRIL 22 2017 Visiter No.643478 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Ken Dost
THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate AUTHORED BY: kenneth-william: Dost - In propria persona, natural and Living man
This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material alteration and modification of the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument that jumps out of the 4 corners and into a world of demonic evil that sets out to destroy all living men, women, and children who were lured into its clutches
Imagine one day you went out and purchased a brand new Chevy Camaro. You did not purchase it to drive it but rather to park it for next 10-15 years for future investment reasons. So you drive it straight from the dealer to a storage warehouse - put a cover over the vehicle, lock the pulldown door and completely walk away, forgetting about the car for the next 10 or so years.
The years roll by until the day arrives you decide to crack open the door and drive out what is now a classic high sought after vehicle, that for all intents and purposes is a brand spanking new vehicle from the year 2015. So, you roll up the door and to your shock and horror your classic vehicle is filthy dirty....Not only are there dents on the hood, the bumper, and rear driver side quarter panel, the interior is worn, the engine is filthy and the odometer has a registered 182,569 miles..... Furious, you come to find out that the manager that oversaw the storage facility the first 9 years your car was in storage had been renting out your vehicle for fees of which he pocketed.....Of course, that manager is no longer employed at the storage facility.
Liken this analogy to at least over 67 million mortgage loans to real property agreements; liken this to your own mortgage loan. While you believed you had ownership, others were leasing out the use of your collateral time and time and time again - earning fees, compensation, and bonuses by stealing the use of your collateral for which you received not a single nickel........As a worse slap in the face, after making millions upon millions off your collateral, these criminal banksters, brokers, and insurance agents default you, defame and assassinate your character, destroy your credit, your livelihood, leaving you penniless in endless debt and millions upon millions: homeless.
When a mortgage borrower puts pen to paper and signs the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument, that is to say, the mortgage loan agreement, the assumption is there is an approval for a mortgage loan, from a lender to purchase real property. The greater assumption is one steeped in paradigm and one of pride, achieving the ‘American Dream’ to which they can now call themselves a homeowner.
The 21st century reality however is the paradigm is dead; a mortgage to real property is nothing more than a legal fiction, a ‘pretend’ mortgage to real property. This was by the banksters along with the government’s intent and design, to make us believe in something that no longer exists. For what purpose, you say? The theft of all ownership of course, not just of the real property collateral, but all property, personal and intellectual, currently owned or that ever will be owned.
Our perception is the mortgage (Deed of Trust/Note) is immediately sold to an investment bank who aggregate the mortgage into a pool with other mortgages, establishing an SPE into which the pool is transferred and from which certificates are issued and sold to investors. -----True? Not entirely The fact of the matter is that the originator/pretend lender does not actually sell anything, rather merely pledges the alleged loan, in other words, the alleged mortgage loan is 'held for sale'....It is ONLY upon default that the alleged mortgage loan's "first sale" actually occurs...Stated another manner, the Assignment of Deed of Trust is the first sale - that is too say the putting back together of title and note, which though in fact was never together to begin with because the 'option' to purchase the defaulted loan was sold before a borrower ever signed the documents. The option holder (broker) has control of the note and may and does sell it time and time again.....Imagine making 1000 copies of the executed note, putting them in a box and shipping it off to Borders Bookstore. The box is unpacked, labeled with a price tag and put on the shelves for sale - no different from a copyrighted work...except in this case the mortgage is a derivative and the broker is the holder of that copyright derivative.
Ownership of copyrights can be transferred either by operation of law or by a written instrument. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a) (2000). Courts have interpreted "transfer by operation of law" to mean "transfers by bequest, bankruptcy, mortgage foreclosures, and the like." Taylor Corp. v. Four Seasons Greetings, L.L.C., 403 F.3d 958, 963 (8th Cir. 2005) (citing Brooks v. Bodes, 230.781 F. Supp. 202, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 1991))
As a matter of law, authors and owners of copyright immediately possess the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, perform, and display copyrighted works and to prepare derivative works based on them. The Computer Software Copyright Act of 1980 amended the Copyright Act of 1976 to include “computer programs.”
The Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument is a copyrighted work of a computer program which becomes a derivative upon the borrowers signing of the agreement. The banksters are thus unjustly enriching themselves many times over, selling an alleged mortgage loan they do not even own....The broker's future fees and compensation are realized upon default with the actual first sale, which he collects on with the liquidation of the collateral.
Stated another way:
-Derivatives were deregulated
-Derivatives are securities
-Derivatives are credit default swaps, Collateralized Bond Obligations (CBO), CMO'S, CDO'S, CDO SQ., RMBS, MBS, ABS, and whatever other financially engineered (patents and trademarks) these bankster, broker, insurance agent criminals can come up with BUT,
-The simplest form of a derivative is in the name of this page - A Copyright Derivative - which occurs when you place your signature upon the copyrighted Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument. Now....
We the people were made reliant on false representations that the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument was 'personal property' thereby a negotiable instrument - UCC3 But, How can a copyright DERIVATIVE, a security, be both a negotiable instrument AND a security It cannot
The common logic is rather clear - We the people were lured into executing a 'basket of securities' of which are STOLEN from us because the one who controls the copyright derivative controls all our 'rights in property' Therefore, Not only have they stolen our real property collateral - they have thus stolen all our rights in property - real, personal, and intellectual which was derived our executing what we believed was a mortgage loan to real property (a negotiable instrument) but in fact and truth was a collateralized copyright.
In fact what consumers were lured into giving uninformed consent to is an installment lease to a future purchase; a presecuritized investment contract to which the consumer is the uninformed third party beneficiary, creditor, and entitlement holder. Most notable, is a 1998 security agreement between Nationsbank (Bank of America) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. registered under the MERS intentionally and actively concealed Trademark found in the publicly accessible databases of the United States Patents and Trademarks Office ("USTPO").
Borrowers were intentionally misled to placed their signatures upon the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument –MERS with representation MERS was just a registry, which states: ¶Borrower understands and agrees that MERS' holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling this Security Instrument.
Further stating, ¶Provides "MERS" is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. MERS is a separate corporation that is acting solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns. MERS is the beneficiary under this Security Instrument. MERS is organized and existing under the laws of Delaware. ¶Provides - The beneficiary of this Security Instrument is MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) and the successors and assigns of MERS’. What borrowers were not told was they were agreeing to a licensing agreement and not a mortgage loan to real property. They were agreeing to give up all ownership to property (real, personal, and Intellectual) or more specifically agreeing to act as a "LICENSEE OF INFORMATION" under the laws of the Commonwealth of the State of Virginia per terms under an intentionally concealed security agreement between Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Nationsbank (Bank of America). As such under Virginia law § 59.1-501.2(15) Defines a Consumer as “[a]n individual who is a licensee of information or informational rights that the individual at the time of contracting intended to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. The term does not include an individual who is a licensee primarily for professional or commercial purposes, including agriculture, business management, and investment management other than management of the individual's personal or family investments.” As such under Virginia law § § 59.1-501.2 (41) (42) (43) as to licenses:
(41) "License" means a contract that authorizes access to, or use, distribution, performance, modification, or reproduction of, information or informational rights, but expressly limits the access or uses authorized or expressly grants fewer than all rights in the information, whether or not the transferee has title to a licensed copy. The term includes an access contract, a lease of a computer program, and a consignment of a copy. The term does not include a reservation or creation of a security interest to the extent the interest is governed by Title 8.9A. [8.9A is Oregon §ORS79 – Secured Transactions]
(42) "Licensee" means a person entitled by agreement to acquire or exercise rights in, or to have access to or use of, computer information under an agreement to which this chapter applies. A licensor is not a licensee with respect to rights reserved to it under the agreement.
(43) "Licensor" means a person obligated by agreement to transfer or create rights in, or to give access to or use of, computer information or informational rights in it under an agreement to which this chapter applies. Between the provider of access and a provider of the informational content to be accessed, the provider of content is the licensor. In an exchange of information or informational rights , each party is a licensor with respect to the information, informational rights, or access it gives. Is it not time to dispose of the deception and deceit that has ravaged the residents of this state, and the citizens of this nation? Is it not time to wake up the fact that the residents of this state, yourself include and your family, have been targets of a mass grand larceny. How much more must we suffer the illegal acts perpetrated upon us by a crooked federal government, its agencies, banksters, brokers, and the insurance sector? How much more do we endure a court system that ignores the rule of law?

APRIL 21 2017 Visiter No.643461 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 20 2017 Visiter No.643425 to mike/ann's www.opg.me


APRIL 20 2017 Visiter No.643393 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

email dispatched@8am 20.04.2017

confirmed acknowledged delivery

APRIL 19 2017 Visiter No.643380 to mike/ann's www.opg.me

APRIL 19 2017 Visiter No.643374 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz 11 hrs ago
18th of April
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
P.O. Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands RE 162 243 478 US
Dear Sirs:
We are facing a crisis in the long process to restore lawful government to the actual United States and continue to suffer false claims and insupportable, outlawed practices which the so-called Territorial United States and Municipal United States corporations have been attempting to foist off on the actual states and people.
On May 1, 2017, they propose to set up a deliberate fraud scheme to attack and defraud millions upon millions of innocent people utilizing the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico as a base of operations. This has been done before as part of the fraudulent 1930’s bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc., and is apparently being done in preparation for a similar fraud scheme related to the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES, INC. The scheme has been prepared for by the Obama Administration and is apparently being carried through by the Trump Administration.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a member of the Territorial United States organization, is bankrupting its primary electrical utility corporation. This in itself is hardly worthy of mention on a global scale and would occasion little comment or concern, except that Mr. Obama created millions of purported “franchises” which are supposedly stand as sureties for this particular Puerto Rican public utility.
These “franchises” are all identified using alphabetic ACCOUNT designators that appear to be the names of living Americans--- for example, Alfred T. Krebs or ALFRED T. KREBS. It isn’t certain yet whether they will attempt to use Glossa against our Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation issued last May or not, but their intention has been clearly stated in the press. A copy of the Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation has been included in a letter (copy also attached) to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions.
When unsuspecting Americans receive bills addressed to these foreign public transmitting utilities, they pay them under the false assumption that these bills are legitimately addressed to them. The actual bills are already being paid out of the U.S. Treasury, so the perpetrators pocket the difference and say that these additional payments are “donations” and “gifts”----but are really the fruits of unjust enrichment, extortion, racketeering, and fraud committed by employees against their trusting employers.
It is international mail fraud, international identity theft, and involuntary conscription amounting to international slavery and racketeering being implemented via similar names deceits and the illegal and prohibited use of Glossas and false names. Please note that these Accounts/ACCOUNTS which use middle initials are not even legal names for lack of specificity.
This is also constructive fraud on a massive scale which has been prepared with malice aforethought by foreign governmental services corporations operating as crime syndicates on our shores. The essence of the crime is clearly established. They kidnap, press-gang, and coerce Americans to sign up for programs that only US Territorial or US Municipal employees are eligible for, then falsely claim that these people are “voluntarily” functioning as either Territorial or Municipal “citizens” and are then subject to their private corporation statutes, regulations, and codes.
Mr. Jeffrey Sessions, functioning as the U.S. Attorney General, has been given full warning with regard these deliberate anticipated crimes on our shores as well as a copy of our Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation which was also sent to you last May.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
cc: Letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions (two pages)
Copy of Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation/May 31 2016 (two pages)

Anna von Reitz
12 hrs ·
Business Letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions
April 18, 2017
Mr. Jeffrey Sessions, U.S. Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Dear Mr. Sessions:
I am writing this afternoon ---the 242nd Anniversary of the “Shot heard round the world”---regarding three areas of immediate and urgent concern: (1) the continued forced, fraudulent and inadequately disclosed enrollment of American state nationals in Social Security programs intended exclusively for Territorial United States and Municipal United States citizens and (2) failure of the Territorial and Municipal United States to come to an agreement with the actual land jurisdiction United States regarding proper identification of American state nationals and American State Citizens v. United States Citizens v. citizens of the United States on passports and other international and interstate IDs and (3) the pending bankruptcy of the Puerto Rican Electrical Utility and the fraudulent creation of millions of purported “franchise” public transmitting utilities operated under ACCOUNTS that are deceptively similar in appearance to the names of Americans.
The pretense that people are knowingly volunteering to serve as Withholding Agents, that is, Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service, to help win WWII ran out of steam in September 1945.
The continued international racketeering aimed at deliberately misinformed Americans and their enrollment in “Social Security” under these patently false presumptions of federal employment and Territorial and/or Municipal citizenship have to end immediately. The Territorial and Municipal Government organizations have been under Notice for going on two years. The longer you wait to admit the circumstance and release the adhesion contracts the worse it gets--- and the more people are harmed.
Ditto the situation with passports. The American people are owed competent passport service, but they are being routinely misidentified as United States Citizens and/or citizens of the United States as a result of having been improperly and unconscionably enrolled and conscripted under conditions of fraud as U.S. Territorial and/or U.S. Municipal citizens.
As you are aware, it is illegal to use “legal names”. As you should also be aware, it was never the intention of American states nationals to operate in commerce. Instead, another false presumption was foisted off on us by the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration which sought to “redefine” our lawful American Trade Names as U.S. Foreign Situs Trusts so as to palm off the debts of the private, mostly foreign owned “United States of America” Inc. onto the American states and people by an undisclosed process of hypothecation, fraud, and assumption of debt we never owed.
That boondoggle ended in 1999. Trillions of dollars-worth of labor and assets were siphoned out of this country as a result. Let me suggest to you that there isn’t going to be a re-run of it.
We aren’t putting up with any more “government” racketeering or fraud.
Tell your Boss. Tell the members of the feckless, treasonous, disgusting Congress.
They need to drop the whole plan of bankrupting all those purported public transmitting utilities NAMED after JOE Q. PUBLIC Americans and stop hypothecating debt against all those illegal, unlawful, non-specific, but deceptively similar ACCOUNTS that appear to be our names, and stop sending fraudulent bills through the U.S. Mail.
Tell Mr. Trump--- “NON-ASSUMPSIT” in very large letters. Tell the COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO its electrical utility will have to go bankrupt like any other mismanaged corporation on Earth.
While you are at it, get ready for all the homebound Americans who are now wise to the scam, returning to the land jurisdiction and surrendering all those millions of bogus U.S. PERSONS that were created by the UNITED STATES, INC. back to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Also be aware that we seized upon the derelict United States of America, Inc. that we bailed out of bankruptcy and paid off and which is ours and when we did so, we also took all 50 American land jurisdiction States with it and rolled the whole enchilada back into our actual land jurisdiction state trading companies. Look at the extractions on file and made part of the public record.
All the States of __________ and STATES OF ___________ belong to the ____________States and the __________States belong to the united States of America which belongs to the States which belong to the actual states and people of this country.
It’s over, Mr. Sessions. The Great Fraud that began with the so-called “American Civil War” is over. The Territorial and Municipal “U