Ref Ann Clarke – 10370284 – Court of Protection
dated – 02/03/2012 6am (my birthday – supposedly)
Thank you for your reply.
Firstly, can I point out that;
- You no longer have any consent from my mother to with hold
any funds or manage her affairs in any way shape or form. It has been removed.
Backed by her reports of capacity.
- The so called liability you refer is the liability you
created by the sudden reduction of household income by 90 percent not expected
till January, in an effort to prevent mother’s recruitment of additional legal
help to secure the release of 10 years accounts amongst other things that you
were afraid of and in doing so created the liability of not only the Villa
rent but also the protesting and ultimately the commercial lien served upon
you and your fellow directors.
- What might we ask is your comments about the new liabilities
brought about as a result of your actions where we both have been driven from
our home in Blackpool out of fear from possible loss of liberty brought about
by another unlawful hearing conducted again without consent, where we have
been forced to live in other peoples properties at additional expenses where
funds have not been available to us and where we need to service
this liability now!
- With regard to the intended court hearing, delayed unlawfully
by Judge Batten again I re-iterate my mother has refused to give any further
consent to the courts to conduct anymore further unlawful administrative
hearings which without her consent, where capacity is indeed quite legally
visible and provable, it indeed becomes an unlawful hearing and where in
reality is not necessary as her capacity should not be Judged or affected by
the un-creditworthy, biased testimony of yourself and my sister, her daughter,
whom I might add are both proved to be un-credit worthy and therefore unjustly
being used to pervert and affect the outcome in an unlawful hearing that has
been refused consent from a person whom has proven capacity to take such a
decision. Her release from your unlawful clutches should be without any
further distress what so ever. In a common law court where there would be a
jury of 12 there would not be any such perversion of Justice.
- Further to the above, my mother and I have complete and utter
distrust in the UK statute system without common law hearings with a Jury of
12 and where matters are still being conducted in an unjust statute manner
riding roughshod over the clear and concise refusal of consent to such, it has
evolved to the exile we now live in and as such will not return to the UK
without assureties to both our safety of liberty and assuraties of not being
harassed or intimidated by your attempted serving of unlawful documents to the
legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE within or around any proposed hearing to be
conducted that we might add again has in itself a clear and concise written
refusal of consent by my mother to Judge Batten that is hereby
This matter in its entirety is deteriorating/spiralling out of
control Mr Jones.
You need urgently to reconsider and recognise your
disproportionate use of unlawful activities you and others are using to attempt
to control and subvert an individuals clear and concise rights to free choices
under HUMAN RIGHTS ACTS.
I have already submitted to you in the previous email to this
that my mother will wait no longer for matters of resolution and just in case
you did not read it I hereby enclose another copy below.
copy email of WARNING
01/03/2012 –to – PANNONE & COURT OF
My mother produced a letter & sent some time ago refusing
to give any further consent to anyone dealing with her affairs inclusive of you.
She also produced and published on our website a video of her stating the
Anyone doing such, is liable to further actions.
You are in receipt of various reports that confirm her
capacity from 3 different doctors over a ten year period, 2 from 10 years ago
and 2 recent. You are not qualified in any way, shape or form to judge these
On the above basis, she no longer gives any consent for you to
deal with any of her affairs, regardless of on-going current, kangaroo court,
unlawful administrative processes, again which consent has been
Without her consent and with her capacity, you cannot have any
claim over her, by common law.
Therefore any enquiries you are making are denied any consent
to respond or to deal with and therefore her funds requested that are remaining,
she requests immediate release without further distress.
She can confirm that you have presented her a fear of living
in the UK that her liberty and mine is threatened and thereby our confirmed
address remains her business and mine which she no longer gives you or the court
any consent to have.
She has informed me that without you cooperating and thus
continuing to cause her further distress she intends to publish documents about
the debt, she also believes you are in, to ourselves via a perfected lawful
commercial lien, that she holds over you and your company and also over Martin
John chief executive of the court.
This has been on hold to see if the court and yourself are
going to cooperate but it unfortunately appears that your approved
correspondence today, shows that you are adamantly not going to cooperate.
The court also shows no signs of cooperation either with Judge
Batten’s delays in the technical release of my mother from her and your unlawful
You have driven mother out of her home and you have driven me
also out of that home, she is beginning to have a distinct loss of patience in
this matter and therefore wants to progress matters to a more serious
She believes its your turn, to start feeling the pressures
placed upon us.
Seeing as I am completely not in control of my mother and
especially after reading her reports that state her capacity, of which, to be
honest was the same ten years ago, where I believed in her capacity, I have told
her she may proceed on however direction she choses.
She is the one ultimately whom is losing out on life because
of your actions and the kangaroo court, of unlawful administrative hearings,
undergoing without the persons consent based on obvious medical specialists
confirmed appraisal of capacity.
You are warned here and now, alongside this copied to the
court that this matter is going to escalate very shortly!
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: with held funds
I apologize for not
responding earlier. However the position is that a date has not yet been set for
the hearing. When it has then I will make funds available for
The withheld funds
will continue to be withheld until I have confirmation from the landlord that
there is no outstanding liability.
Head of Private Client and
Court of Protection Groups
For and on behalf of Pannone
in every way"
|Pannone LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
and Wales under number OC317202 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation
Authority (SRA) and authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority. Registered office: 123 Deansgate Manchester M3 2BU where a list
of Members and Partners is open for inspection. We use the word 'partner'
to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with
equivalent standing and qualifications.|
This email and any
attachments are confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you must take no action based on them, nor must you
copy or show them to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
have received this email in error. The contents of this email may be
intercepted, monitored and/or recorded. We accept no responsibility for
viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and any
attachments. If this message is transmitted over the internet be aware
that it may be intercepted by a third party for which we exclude any
liability in negligence or otherwise.
Sent: 26 February 2012 12:56
To: Hugh Jones
Subject: with held
email dated today Sunday 26th February 2012
We wrote to
you on Friday last the 24th February 2012.
a reply before the close of business but did not get one.
therefore enclose the second copy listed below.
There is an
urgency here for this matter to be addressed as we believe your motives for not
responding on this matter is to delay it, so as to facilitate your submission of
your annual accounts charges due very shortly, in which may wipe out the
remaining funds of cash available to mum.
therefore send this second request because as you are aware these outstanding
funds are overdue, long overdue by 5 months, and in actual fact are part of the
original household expenses that you conveniently divided into two some time ago
and then tried referring to them as gratuitous care monies.
problem I re-iterate, you, were the sole creator of, and hence we believe now is
the correct time to put the matter right.
There is an
attended hearing to be held at Preston in relation to mums application to be
released from the court of protection as one assumes you are
You are one
assumes aware that because of your onslaught of activities at mums bungalow and
neighbours, where your attempted service of documents was beginning to frighten
my mother and so we left the house and home to stay elsewhere and now we are
living abroad once more.
I write to
advise that in order to facilitate any such hearing or further moves we are not
in any financial position to accommodate it, as you are still with holding funds
from where there is still no liability, a sum totalling currently of
this liability no longer exists and in our mind never did from the beginning we
request the re-imbursement of such with immediate effect.
also point out that the original so called liability, was a liability that you
created in the first instant.
We will be
writing to Preston Combined Courts today in this very instant matter to express
our vulnerabilities that you have placed us in.
refused any consent to proceed in the manners you have.