FAO NORMA WHEELER of NETWORK SOLUTIONS
Dear Norma Wheeler
Please read the information below sent to your colleagues.
We write in connection with the letter from Sarah Sharp of Pannone LLP,
providing some of her clarification on an order from a Judge without a
If I provided the company PANNONE LLP with a cheque to the sum of £43,000
in which they claim approximately to be their costs in this matter and that
cheque was provided without a
signature, would you, they or anyone for that matter
consider that cheque to be valid and usable?
I think you will find in law and in commerce it is not valid or
Therefore on this point alone the order is invalid. Its invalid because of
the Judicial dictatorship
corruption going on in the UK.
Our website is exposing these facts to the public. The lack of a signature
is there to protect the Judge whom I might add has committed an act of
- Read article 6 section 2
listed upon the Civil Liberties Protection and Human Rights. Section 2. There
must be a hearing before an independent and impartial
court or tribunal established by law (including unbiased jurors) .
The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law and to democracy
itself. The right applies to both criminal
and civil cases.
- Any judge that
acts as a judge in Family Court is presiding in an unconstitutional court and
is therefore committing the crime of Trespass
of Treason against your Civil Rights and against the Constitution - THE LAW OF
THE LAND! Especially when consent has been denied to that hearing
and also a request for a jury also
It is our sole contention that with a signature on that order I can proceed
against that JUDGE whom is acting with impunity without their signature upon
My mother has suffered systematic abuse by these people where upon we have
proved beyond reasonable doubt her capacity to make her own mind up and has had
such capacity all along, proved by 4 reports by 3 doctors over an 11 year
period. There has been an overall miscarriage of justice due to shortcomings of
UK procedures now in place, leaving us living in exile. The only exposure we
have is our website and a potential television program soon to be in the making,
by Channel 4 Television.
We assume you also may be a mother and have a son, presumably you would not
like these matters brought upon you and that is our cause, to stand and fight
for the HUMAN RIGHTS ACTS to be observed and more over the common laws of our
land under the constitution to be observed.
You do not need to look far to see the injustices here.
Please fall upon the right side of Justice and it will no doubt prevail in
This matter is not about money, its about CIVIL LIBERTIES and the denial of
such in corrupts manners.
I love my mother and I trust you are human enough love your close relatives
Under common laws she is being protected, but those laws are and have been
undermined over the years to create this living hell.
Mike & Ann of the Clarke family.
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 9:48 AM
Subject: Fw: Network Solutions Support Information:
have written to the court also four times to ask for a signed copy of the
Judges order. There has been no response.
you ask the company to provide proof of service in order to validate their so
called order it will not be forthcoming.
expect your country and mine to adhere to common laws of the land under the
Magna Carta and Bill of Rights, this order does not!
now have the evidence here before you in my last 2 emails to prove the invalidity of the so-called
31 Cherry Tree Rd, Blackpool FY4
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Network Solutions Support Information:
DOMAIN IN HOLD STATUS
your suspension of domain status. WWW.OPG.ME
“Commercial lien” referred to was served under common law and not statute
under BLACKS LAW dictionary are a
legislative rule of society given the force of law under the consent
of the governed and in this case read our site where consent
court order was obtained illegally as consent to the administrative hearing was
refused and a trial by a common law court under control of a jury was requested
and refused. Its refusal is a denial of due process and if you read the site,
complaints have been sent to the attorney general and the office of Judicial
complaint stating that an act of treason has been committed by the judge and a
at a truly dire state and the site is a reference site for high up UK officials
examining the content of its complaints, of which they cannot do whilst you have
it under hold.
Take notice that whilst the unlawful
court order is being looked into we advise that the site needs re instatement
and if you continue its “on hold” status we will have no option but to serve
NETWORK SOLUTIONS the value of the site now standing at £9.1 million pounds,
some $15 million dollars. You are now causing us to suffer a serious TORT under common law and thus
we are entitled to make such a “Commercial Lien/Claim”
against your company.
your company chooses to read the content thoroughly one will discover that their
so called court order is not worth the paper its written on and as such is also
under UK jurisdiction not USA.
TAKE NOTICE you have hereby been
advised of our position on this matter in this email.
expect it to be looked into with expediency, for every hour the site is down is
causing untold duress and stress.
further matter to take into consideration the court order they refer to has of
yet, not been served and as such
carries no validity in law by the UK court rules & until such time that it
has and when it has, it also is illegal alongside being addressed to
the legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE not the Sovereign human being Mike:
are several items to consider not just one in this very instance but your
involvement in this matter will, if not resolved very urgent will result in our
issuing you the effective Commercial Lien claim value that we are now currently
are being duped by the solicitors whom if you check our site, are under
investigation by SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY in the UK for improprieties
where my mothers finances are concerned.
order not worth paper its written on due to the court convened in an illegal
unconstitutional manner.(Required consent, refused!)
orders carry no validity in any event until served in person, which it has
court order cannot be served as I have revoked my legal fiction person status
with UK. I am a sovereign, human, flesh and blood being.
court process was denied due process also illegal being looked into
right to free speech is now being denied by you under an illegal order of no
validity and so the action taken by you is your sole
expect an urgent response.
31 Cherry Tree
Rd, Blackpool FY4 4NS
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 8:32 PM
Subject: FW: Network Solutions Support Information:
has received the attached court order concerning the contents found on the
to our Terms of Services and the Court Order, we have disabled the domain name
OPG.ME, effectively disabling the website. You are able to access the hosting
services and remove the offending content as outlined per the court order. If
you chose to do so, please respond to this email that the content(s) have been
removed and we will remove the hold on the domain.
domain shall remain in a hold status until such time as we have been advised by
you and have confirmed the content has been removed or until such time as we are
presented with a valid court order instructing us on the release of the domain
you have any questions, please respond to firstname.lastname@example.org.
From: Sarah Sharp
Sent: 22 May 2012 09:32
Subject: RE: Network Solutions Support
We write further to your emails
dated 18th and 30th April 2012
regarding the website www.opg.me.
You state that your legal team
cannot remove the website because of freedom of speech and that we need to file
legal action against OPG to prove slander or defamation.
Please find attached a copy of the
final injunction we have obtained on 2nd May 2012
against Mr Clarke, the author of the content of the website. The injunction
restrains Mr Clarke from maintaining existing text and or postings on the
website www.opg.me which refers to or affords
any link to any document referring to the "Commercial Lien" or which in any
other way suggests members of Pannone are indebted or liable to Mr Clarke or his
Please also find attached to this
email a schedule titled "Index to bundle of documents evidencing interim
injunction breaches for hearing on 2nd May 2012".
This schedule sets out the 57 entries/postings on the website at which reference
is made to the so called "Commercial Lien".
Given that these postings breach
the court injunction we have obtained against Mr Clarke we request that the site
be disabled or these entries and hyperlinks removed.
We await your urgent response.
From: Network Solutions
Sent: 18 May 2012 16:58
To: Sarah Sharp; Sarah
Subject: Network Solutions Support
apologize for the delayed response. Regarding your concern, you may send your
documents over to email@example.com.
Solutions values you as a customer. We hope you find this update helpful.
However, if you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to contact
our Customer Service Department.
Network Solutions Customer, you are entitled to unlimited access, day or night,
to skilled Customer Service Representatives. To reach us, call 1-888-642-9675.
If you are calling from outside the U.S. or Canada, please call 1-570-708-8788.
Thanks again for giving us the opportunity to serve you.