From:                              Mike Clarke <mike@rake.net>

Sent:                               31 July 2014 03:15

To:                                   Morton, Alexandra

Subject:                          Re: FAO PETER JACKSON

 

Dear JUDGE Jackson

Can you tell me what is it that makes you believe your order was not VOID??
Why should my mother and I have to suffer more trauma at the hands of criminals!   ie YOU??
Which is what you you are!

You were made aware of the WILL
THAT YOU AUTHORISED!!

A will that you later then criticise!!  with DOUBLE STANDARDS!!
What is it with you people, JUDGES, that you think are ABOVE THE LAW & so unaccountable??

WHY DID YOU FURTHER RING FENCE my mother's HOUSE??


YOU have absolutely no evidence to suggest I am unfit to be who I am.
YOU and your kind are relying on assumption, presumption & lies without any real evidence!!

YOU are as corrupt as the deputy solicitor receiver HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES that was appointed by the equally corrupt SENIOR MASTER JUDGE DENZIL ANTON LUSH.

YOUR PERSECUTING INNOCENT VULNERABLE PEOPLE WITH CAPACITY WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YOU.

YOU are the cause of severe suffering to the elderly.... infirm and vulnerable by your actions, I despise you.

You along with your entire corrupt mechanism are not... repeat NOT acting in the best interests of any patient of the court of protection you are by point of fact devious, manipulative, evil racketeers with whom I hold nothing but contempt for...

YOU ARE DESPICABLE PEOPLE.
EVIL TO THE CORE.

We should not need to vary any order that was VOID to start with.
There should not be any need to make any further application.

YOU SHOULD ACCEPT THAT YOUR WITHOUT EVIDENCE CRITICISM BASED ON LIES FROM A THIEF AND HIS ASSOCIATE COMPLICES THAT ONLY SEEK WEALTH WITHOUT WORK AND OR CARE..

Your actions shed complete and utter disrespect upon the MASONIC FREEMASONRY that I believe you are a part of.
Your OATH to such is a CONFLICT of your public interest duties and associated OATH.

YOU are BIAS and in conflict with the very nature of the task you are charged with.
COMPLETE AND UTTER CORRUPTION IN OUR COURTS not yours!!

I will continue to express my strident views as you once put it as I believe YOU are wrong AND I AM RIGHT.
YOUR OPERATING A RACKET THAT IS DEFRAUDING PEOPLE OUT OF CASH AND HOMES.

BEING A RESIGNED MASON I UNDERSTAND YOUR OATHS OF CONFLICT TO PUBLIC DUTY THAT IS A DEFINATE INJUSTICE TO ANY WOULD BE SOUL SEEKING JUSTICE FROM A BIASED BASED CORRUPT ENVIRONMENT WHICH NEEDS REMOVAL FORM OUR COURTS of so-called JUSTICE.

FREEMASONRY WITHIN OUR COURTS IS A BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT IS OBVIOUS TO ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN.
THE PUBLIC HAVE BEEN DUPED BY FRAUD FOR LONG ENOUGH.. THE GAME IS UP JACKSON.

Mike Clarke




On 30/07/2014 17:47, Morton, Alexandra wrote:

Dear Mr Clarke,

 

The judge has seen your message below.  He replies that an application of this kind cannot be dealt with informally.  If you wish to vary the order, you must make an application to the Court of Protection in proper form, accompanied by the order that you attach, and serve it upon the other interested parties.  The court will then give directions for the application to be considered.

 

Regards

 

Alexandra

 

 

Alexandra Morton

Clerk to Mr Justice Peter Jackson
Family Division Liaison Judge for the Northern Circuit
alexandra.morton@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

 


From: Mike Clarke [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 30 July 2014 13:16
To: Morton, Alexandra
Subject: FAO PETER JACKSON

 

FAO Judge Jackson at his request in his order below or attached

Dear Alexandra

link to the order http://opg.me/Clarke%20judgment%209.10.12.pdf     or as attached

On the 9th October 2012 Peter Jackson placed an order on my mothers property that it could not be sold in her lifetime.
My mother could not enjoy the comfort of her own home as we are in exile from further corruption committed by COP JUDICIARY.

My mother requires to sell or exchange her property for another abroad.
What process does she now have to follow to have this order removed because Mr JACKSON in section 37 of the order above clearly states that he reserves the right of any further application in this matter.

We believe the order was void in the first instance because Peter Jackson authorised my mother to make a will in which she made a living will that made me her son the living will executor if anyone further claimed she was incapacitated that Peter Jackson was fully aware of before placing his order upon her property.

Mr Jackson also within this order states implicitly that my mothers will had all the hallmarks of being written by me in which it was NOT, clear advice was taken from another whom did advice on the will to be drafted to suit my mother's wishes that I might add have been the same wishes for 11 long years prior to the making of this will and that Mr JACKSON claimed in his order she had the capacity to make!

Having been in exile since January 13th 2013 for 1 year and a half and no justice in sight to resolve matters it is now clear to my mother that the UK is corrupt and we can no longer return to live there.

The house has been empty during this time and is becoming damp and needs repairs and so is currently devalued, it is for this reason before the onset of another winter my mother requires matters resolving.

It is with some urgency now that she requires the order lifting from her property in order to sell or exchange it for something where she can enjoy the benefit of her  living in peace.

Mike & Ann Clarke [cop ref 10370284]

This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.