DECEMBER 31 2012 Read about article 6 of the european human rights convention and the entitlement to a fair and impartial hearing.
DECEMBER 31 2012 ARTICLE ON CONSENT Read an article on CONSENT & Abuse of Judicial Power
There have been cases reported of judges who have threatened to jail lienors for "contempt of court" if they do not "voluntarily" lift their liens. In two cases, the judges actually carried out their threat. Such legal coercion on their part is almost certainly unlawful. Nonetheless, some judges will use that tactic, if they think the lienor is vulnerable. To deal with this problem, it is helpful to remember the following:
1. The only reason the judge is making that threat is because he has no lawful means of extinguishing the lien. It is a move of fear and desperation.
2. Assess your own vulnerability. Will a few days in jail seriously affect your life? If not, you have some psychological leverage. Otherwise, the judge has a lever over you.
3. If your lien does end up in court, you may want to have a lawyer or a talented pro se with you, so that somebody can file an effective writ of habeas corpus, if necessary. Also, you may wish to learn how to effectively defend yourself against contempt charges.
4. If the judge actually does imprison you on a bogus contempt charge, he becomes personally liable for civil damages, criminal sanctions, and a commercial lien. The judge is taking a risk by violating your rights. He is probably hoping that you don’t know how to pursue an effective legal remedy. In many ways, this is a game of "chicken."
DECEMBER 29 2012 PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS In view of the dire circumstances we find ourselves in and due consultations going on today with advisers under common law, it is highly likely we will be issuing private criminal prosecutions next week against PANNONE LLPs, all 50 partners and also the police at Watlington Police Station for Unlawful civil arrest against their oath of office, without my consent, & The Police at Blackpool for trespass, of fees of £5000 per each officer attending 2 off on 2 visits, breaking and entering and breach of the peace causing business damage and loss. We are legally informed that if criminal charges are filed against PANNONES, under court rules all civil liability actions are shelved until criminal matters are dealt with, we are also legally informed that PANNONEs are breaking the No1 court rule of negotiation by mediation before any court matter proceeds and their blank refusal to do this.
DECEMBER 28@10am 2012 ARRESTED on the M6@Birmingham On a civil arrest warrant like someone who was wanted for terrorism where 3 police cars hemmed us in on the motorway to force me to the side exit, causing alarm and distress to my mother! Transported from there to Manchester Courts and then released to a later date to face a breach of a court order and so contempt of court. AMAZING - the world we now live in... Contempt of court is wholly a common law misdemeanor where a jury of your peers is required to judge!! The police being placed on the oath of office ignored the fact they had no jurisdiction to arrest on a civil warrant without my consent!! Who is breaking the laws today? us or them? Listen to the ARREST
DECEMBER 27 2012 To the manor born..
to the manor born, me, mum and James spent Christmas with friends in a manor house down south where some common law schooling took place on OATHS of Office, Failure to Perform upon a 'Duty of Care' & negligence & thus the removal of the corporate shield, Contempt of Court, Administrative Courts without consent and more..
DECEMBER 19 2012 @6am in the morning Police arrive again, mob handed at 31 Cherry Tree Rd to arrest the legal fiction 'Michael Clarke' only to not find it. It being the birth certificate/corporation, which is there of course. Anyway, they get out of bed all paying tenants of the property to interrogate each and every one. Not content are Pannones Partner's to harass little old ladies out £250,000 they now harass innocent tenants disrupting what little business income the little old lady has left. Meanwhile back at 'The Ranch House' all are nice and snug, tucked up in their beds probably sound asleep dreaming about christmas and what daddy might buy for them out of his ill gotten gains of association with the criminally fraudulent, negligent mal administrator HUGH JONES & his posse of bandits of the old and infirm.
DECEMBER 18 2012 10:30am POLICE ARRIVE At the home of the family Clarke. They read the Notices displayed at the entrances of REMOVAL of IMPLIED RIGHT of access and acknowledge this. Being recorded as they are banging at the door in a threatening and manacing fashion stating they are the POLICE and are going to break down the door if not answered(ILLEGAL). There is initially one younger officer then joined by a second older officer whom seemed more professional in his approach. The door is opened upon which they barge in(ILLEGAL). They state they are looking for the legal fiction, corporation, birth certificate, 'MICHAEL CLARKE'. They cause distraction in order to 'break & enter' property where they are told belongs to tenants by removing screws from locks(ILLEGAL). After searching the property, attics, garden, garage and all, causing alarm and distress and questioning to mum(aged 71) they decide to leave, stating they will be back, day and night. They claimed to have an arrest warrant from PANNONE LLPs which was not properly shown to the occupants. Mum was subsequently moved to a safe address in order to enjoy her christmas but obviously that not being within her own home as intended. Now would Pannone LLPs like to receive the same treatment over christmas? We would now invite the police to show/scan and send their copy of the so called arrest warrant by email to firstname.lastname@example.org in order that we may check its validity in legal/lawful terms, where it must display a judge signature so that this person is going to take responsibility, a seal of the court initialising such and that a valid warrant must have the name of the judge clearly identified. To recap .. sealed, signed and clearly identified authorisation! We do not believe that this is the case here.
DECEMBER 17 2012 Read the STATEMENT of CASE so far for the COURT of APPEAL17122012.pdf FAXED to the court of appeal and emailed to
HELEN GRANT MP
GORDON MARSDEN MP
DUNCAN HAMES MP
ALICE CORAL parliamentary ombudsman ref EN 135765
DECEMBER 17 2012 VOID COURTS & ORDERS Read more information on void orders and void courts. 1961:
In MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd.  Lord Denning confirmed that:
(i) a void order is automatically void without more ado;
(ii) a void order does not have to be set aside by a Court to render it void although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have the Court set the void order aside;
(iii) a void order is incurably void and all proceedings based on the void order/invalid claim are also void.
Read about any actions taken on a void order are trespass and can have claims laid against those whom act upon void orders! Read the PDF of those using a VOID order will be committing the act of TRESPASS.
DECEMBER 16 2012 Sunday A day OFF
DECEMBER 15 2012 Reply to LAND REGISTRY FAXED EMAILED & RECORDED DELIVERY Read a reply to the land registry outlining legal lawful facts.
DECEMBER 15 2012 Land Registry Reply Read the refusal of the land registry to remove the unilateral notice of charges upon my mothers property after receiving an application from her to cancel it. Our follow up reply to be posted here shortly... (todays task)
DECEMBER 14 2012 JOIN LAWFUL REBELLION In persuit of JUSTICE .. Affidavit 1 send recorded delivery to The Queen at Buckingham Palace & wait 40 days affidavit 2 send recorded delivery to The Queen at Buckingham Palace, its official you are in Lawful Rebellion and a FREEMAN of the land.
DECEMBER 14 2012 Read THE PDF COPY or the actual email to court of appeals here. JACKSON states the jurisdiction of the court of protection has ended in this matter. Filed by FAX & by EMAIL & by RECORDED DELIVERY all documents back to supreme court of appeal. Its all like a game of tennis being passed backwards and forwards, pillar to post, nothing new in this saga.
DECEMBER 13 2012 Read pdf an email to ADMINISTRATOR JACKSON on how to proceed in view of the impass. Actual email
DECEMBER 13 2012 Read
an email arrived this morning in connection with a request to be involved in the Public Guardian review.
DECEMBER 13 2012 Reply from the appeals for Supreme Court Read the reply from the Appeals office of the Supreme denying access to the Supreme and moving us back to Jackson for reconsideration.
ONGOING CURRENT INVESTIGATION 13.12.2012 Of Fabien / Masonic links between Pannone LLPs in-particular HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES and the 3 Judges LUSH, FOSKETT & JACKSON are active and on-going to discover the bias that is clearly operating here and the obvious result of corruption in attempts to restrict access to fair and impartial hearings or Court de Jures (Jury Courts) with repressed access to representation and denial of due process alongside refusal to full disclosure clearly showing the end result of BIAS & CORRUPTION in favour of the obvious beneficiaries, THE JUDICIARY or "BAR". The swearing of allegience to each other, of the brethren, is a clear contradiction of the positions they treaonously take by force and kid us into belief of their oath of office and allegience to the Queen. FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION
Senior Judge Denzil Anton Lush
18/7/1951 Southsea, Hants
supporting Plymouth Argyle FC, collecting commemorative pottery
admitted slr England and Wales 1978, slr and NP Scotland 1993; ptnr Anstey Sargent & Probert Slrs Exeter 1985-95; Court of Protection: master 1996-2007, sr judge 2007-; memb Master of the Rolls' Working Pty on Structured Settlements 2002; former memb: Mental Health and Disability Ctee Law Soc, Steering Gp on Advance Directives BMA; pt/t chm Social Security Appeals Tbnls 1994-96, judicial memb Soc of Tst and Estate Practitioners (STEP) 1996-; patron Slrs for the Elderly 2002-; tstee Pan-European Orgn of Personal Injury Lawyers (PEOPIL) Fndn 2004-06; Geoffrey Shindler Award for Outstanding Contrib to the Profession STEP Private Client Awards 2009; FRSM 2001
JACKSON PROFILE Sir Peter Arthur Brian Jackson (born 9 December 1955), styled The Hon. Mr Justice Peter Jackson, is an English High Court judge, assigned to the Family Division. He was called to the Bar by the Inner Temple in 1978 and became a Queen's Counsel in 2000. He was subsequently appointed as a Recorder in 1998, a Deputy High Court Judge in 2003 and a High Court Judge with effect from 1 October 2010. Chambers & Partners described Jackson as a "master tactician [who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not," while Legal 500 called him "one of the most authoritative children silks around.
Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom
High Court Judge
Born 16 March 1949
Alma mater King's College London
Sir David Robert Foskett (born 19 March 1949), styled The Hon. Mr Justice Foskett, is a British High Court judge.
He was educated at Warwick School and at King's College London (LLB, 1970) during which time he also served as President of the Students' Union. He was called to the Bar at Gray's Inn in 1972 and became a bencher there in 1999. He was made a QC in 1991, recorder from 1995-2007, deputy judge of the High Court from 1998-2007, and judge of the High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) since 2007. Foskett is the editor of the leading text on the English law of compromise.
DECEMBER 12 2012 WE ARE ALL threatened WITH PRISON When the one's that you are blowing the whistle to, are as corrupt as the ones that you are blowing the whistle on, you are simply wasting your breath!
DECEMBER 12 2012 Read
documents sent to land registry to remove costs charges by Hugh Jones a statutory declaration of VOID costs order of PETER JACKSON the administrator due to lack of jurisdiction on 24.10.2012. FILED recorded delivery on the COURTS + HUGH JONES + SIMON HEAPY & the LAND REGISTRY. Email sent
DECEMBER 12 2012 Read Affidavit_of_Michael_Clarke_12122012_1212pm.pdf sent to the her majesty the Queen.
DECEMBER 10 2012 ADVICE A man after my own heart... Roy Jenkins; Best piece of advice I ever had was around 1991/2 when a crime reporter on a national paper told me "record every conversation you can of these corrupt officer/solicitors and any one else, make three copies and put them in safe places" he also warned me "you are up against the big boys now who will pull more dirty tricks, tell more lies than you will have ever known before, they will use false documentation against your claims, so either go for the long haul or simply give up now". Well i never gave up:)) DITTO
DECEMBER 10 2012 Read a FINAL ATTEMPT at resolution prior to issuing private criminal prosecutions.
DECEMBER 8 2012 Read about void orders Read
the pdf format Read THE VOID ORDER2.pdf Read Lewald's Cases.pdf Read LITIGANT IN PERSON
DECEMBER 8 2012
Read a feature in the LAW Society Gazette about Litigants in Person struggling to obtain justice, no wonder the common law process of commercial liens are going to become popular, written 19th January 2012.Read the pdf format
DECEMBER 7@4pm 2012 Read a letter from Roger Hayes of British Constitution Group as mediator to PANNONES.
DECEMBER 7@4pm 2012 Read a reply to all PANNONE PARTNERS.
DECEMBER 7 2012 Read
a letter from fellow campaigner MP Duncan Hames.
DECEMBER 7 2012 Read a faxed emailed and recorded delivery letter to HM Courts re DAVID FOSKITT.
DECEMBER 6 2012 FAO PANNONES LLPs FAO Pannones ALL LLPs
Ref Commercial Lien – Statutory Declaration – VOID order by Administrator Foskitt
So-called 'Judge' Foskitt should not be referred to as a Judge... he is acting in the capacity of a court administrator... and his judgments are only valid if he acts with the consent of both parties.
I have made it plain that I do not consent to judgments by any member of the judiciary acting on his/her own... and that I will accept only judgments made in accordance with the law...
i.e. a common law court and a jury.
I had already sent to the court a refusal of consent on this matter but it was ignored.
I have submitted a statutory declaration stating it was illegal and unlawful and did not show any consent in any way.
The so-called 'order' is void... because it represents a denial of due process of law... and of suspected bias... the Judge being a member of the legal profession... as are Pannones.
Also - I suspect Masonic skulduggery... and I ask for the court administrator to confirm in writing that he is or isn't a Mason - I ask Pannones if any of their partners are of the Masonic Brotherhood - who swears allegiance to each other - and not to the delivery of justice.
I ask also... by what authority the administrator sits in judgment... when not under his oath of office.
I ask also if he is representing the Queen... if so, how can that be if the Queen is no longer sovereign.
I ask how the administrator can sit without a jury... & by what authority does he claim to be able to do so... SHOW ME THE LAW IN RELATION TO THIS!
To educate Pannone's I also state that Magna Carta provides that 'no man shall be imprisoned without judgment of his peers', in accordance with the law' - and if Court Administrator, ‘Foskitt’ does so - I will be taking out a private criminal prosecution against him... for perverting the course of justice, kidnap, unlawful imprisonment and I will be seeking compensation of £1,000,000.
I want to settle this matter by resolution but your head of resolution just keeps on issuing threats!!
We intend to publish the debt in failing to negotiate by resolution.
Relevant correspondence 26.01.2012Affidavit 30.01.2012openletter 10.02.2012toJUDGESHARP 24.4.2012fromFOSKITT 30.4.2012NOTICE 01.05.2012letter1 02.05.2012letter2 05.05.2012lettertocourt
DECEMBER 5 2012 Read
an email to MP Helen Grant in connection with a review of the Public Guardian.
DECEMBER 5 email@example.com Read a further reply to Paul Jonson.
DECEMBER 4 firstname.lastname@example.org REPLY Read our reply.
Re: ILLEGAL UNLAWFUL VOID ORDER
email reply to email@example.com
ATTACHED STATUTORY DECLARATION
I cannot comply with your request as it does not make sense.
It represents more incompetence on behalf of you & your company.
I have made and deposited to the court a statutory declaration in which I attach here once more.
The order you hold with the TREASONOUS Judge Foskitt is illegal, unlawful and VOID.
Mike & Ann Clarke
DECEMBER 4 2012 Received at 20.02pm today Read A COPY OF the JUDGE FOSKITT'S order sent here from Pannone LLPs threat of prison in their email from firstname.lastname@example.org Dear Sir
We attach the final order we obtained in the claim against you. As you know it contains a penal notice.
The email you have sent to our partners/former partners is a breach of that order namely:
3 (d) “taking any further steps to enforce or claim to be entitled to enforce the so called “Commercial Lien” or the alleged debt said to be represented by the same whether in the sum of £9M, £5M or any other sum;”
3 (e) “ further communication, whether by email or otherwise howsoever, with any member of the 3rd Claimant LLP in relation to any matter concerning the so called “Commercial Lien” or the alleged debt said to be represented by the same whether in the sum of £9M, £5M or any other sum;”
Unless you now take steps to withdraw the so called commercial lien and cease emailing our partners/former partners, we will consider we have no alternative but to apply to court for a committal order.
You have until 4pm Friday 7 November 2012 to provide evidence to the writer of the withdrawal of the so called commercial lien. This time limit will not be extended and we will not enter into correspondence on the point.
Head of Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Division
For and on behalf of Pannone LLP
This is the Judge that refused a common law court with jury!! TREASON
DECEMBER 4 2012 NAMES GIVEN
PHSO DECISION WAS MADE FROM A PANEL OF 5
JACK KELLET, LIBBY CLARK, CLAIRE EVANS, MARTIN PIKE, ANN HARDING & THE DEPUTY MASTER OF THE COURT OF APPEAL WAS A BANCROFT-RIMMER. APPEAL LETTERS HAVE GONE BACK TO BOTH.
DECEMBER 4 2012 WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW, REBELLION BECOMES DUTY.
In a frightening example of how the state is tightening its grip around the free Internet, it has emerged that You Tube is complying with thousands of requests from governments to censor and remove videos that show protests and other examples of citizens simply asserting their rights, while also deleting search terms by government mandate.
The latest example is You Tube’s compliance with a request from the British government to censor footage of the British Constitution Group Lawful Rebellion protest, during which they attempted to civilly arrest Judge Michael Peake at Birkenhead county court.
Peake was ruling on a case involving Roger Hayes, former member of UKIP, who has refused to pay council tax, both as a protest against the government’s treasonous activities in sacrificing Britain to globalist interests and as a result of Hayes clearly proving that council tax is illegal.
Hayes has embarked on an effort to legally prove that the enforced collection of council tax by government is unlawful because no contract has been agreed between the individual and the state. His argument is based on the sound legal principle that just like the council, Hayes can represent himself as a third party in court and that “Roger Hayes” is a corporation and must be treated as one in the eyes of the law.
DECEMBER 4 2012 Read a recorded delivery letter to a DIRECTOR of PANNONE LLP's, CHARLES SOREN ROBERT TATTAM D.o.B. 14.07.1953, of "The Ranch House", Gore Lane, Alderley Edge, Cheshire. SK9 7SF. This will be the start, to name and shame the associates of the criminal, HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES. Those whom will sit back in their "Ranch Houses" whilst associated with fraud, theft, mal administration and financial rape of the elederly vulnerable, acting with impunity, afforded the protection of the New World Order of elite! The turkey will be in the oven for these people over christmas because they have in effect stolen my mothers, for this christmas, but we know who you are and where you are? Keep looking down your drive at night Charles, you never know when... "THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW BAILIFFS" might arrive! Email to Charles
DECEMBER 3 2012 DECLARATION FILED STAT. DEC. Filed today by recorded delivery upon
Manchester Civil Justice Centre
1 Bridge Street West
Manchester Greater Manchester
FAO CASE NO 2MA90015
Chester Civil Justice Centre
Trident House Little St John Street
FAO CASE NO 2MA90015
Manchester M3 2BU
FAO THE PARTNERS = ALL
FAO CASE NO 2MA90015
DECLARING that the harassment order made of injunction is UNLAWFUL, ILLEGAL & THEREFORE VOID. Michael Clarke's STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Michael Clarke, Occupation CARER of Ann Clarke
Address c/o 31 Cherry Tree Rd Blackpool FY4 4NS
Make the following declaration under the statutory declarations act 1835
It has recently come to my attention that the CIVIL CASE No 2MA90015 of an injunction made against me on fraudulent Harassment grounds was not only;
a) Unlawful; as it was conducted in my absence without my consent and where a constitutionally formed common law court with a jury was requested and was refused it also was;
b) Illegal; as it breached my rights to protection against any civil liability whilst conducting my duties as a carer, under Mental Capacity Act section 5
I hereby make oath and state as follows that the order made against me is VOID because;
1. The allegations contained in the counter defence were of a criminal nature contained within a commercial lien – claim of £9 million pounds against PANNONE LLP’s and therefore was not in a court of law that deals with such criminal nature in a fair and impartial manner and;
2. For the reasons also listed above in a. & b.
I understand that a person who intentionally makes a false statement in a statutory declaration is guilty of an offence under section 18 of the statutory declarations act 1835, and I believe that the statements in this declaration are true in every particular.
Signed by: Michael: Clarke
NOVEMBER 29 2012 LOOK at the possibility of private prosecutions when justice becomes injustice by being blocked from fair and impartial hearings, take matters up to a criminal level to gain a court de jure, common law with jury.
NOVEMBER 28 2012 Read letter to appeals court emailed posted and faxed.
NOVEMBER 28 2012 Read the reply from COP rep Jemima Ndow-Coker that now I am supposed to go back to Judge Jackson for reconsideration even after he has issued a sealed order stating his refusal to conduct any appeal here to Read
NOVEMBER 28 2012 Read a formal letter sent recorded delivery to PHSO.
NOVEMBER 28 2012 Email to PHSO Alice Coral requesting 1. that the file is passed to the review team and 2. the names of the senior directors that took the decision to suspend the investigation.
NOVEMBER 28 2012 Read & take note that the courts keep RE-labelling the APPLICATION respondents as my sister "WILD" and that our skeleton appeal is about fraud and corruption based around an impartial and fair hearing not given and where our respondents are named as the ultimate liability is 'The Court of Protection' its Master 'Denzil Lush' and its agent 'Hugh Jones', and OPG CEO ALAN ECCLES!!! What the hell has that got to do with my sister????? DO YOU THINK THAT THE COURTS ARE TRYING TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE!!!
NOVEMBER 27 2012 Read a REPLY from the Court of Appeal today. they certainly don't make the process easy do they. So, I copied the letter and sent it to COP representative Jemima Ndow-Cocker, Date 27112012
Ref 10370284 and the attached letter from APPEAL COURTS
Is this letter now implying that we send the appeal back to you for another Court of Protection Appeal or does the sealed order from Judge Jackson on the 17th November 2012 cover that there will be no appeal, if so, do I send it back to the APPEAL COURTS with Judge Jacksons sealed order of appeal refusal?? Linked here
CONFUSED?? but not broken!
NOVEMBER 26 2012 Two pronged move forward failing the Court of Appeals fair and impartial aaproach on our plight currently we hear being considered by Judges.
NOVEMBER 24 2012 British Constitution Group Annual meeting
in Stoke on Trent today where 500 people, of the growing fast organisation met to plan a go forward strategy for the next 3 years on Magna Carta 2015, the Bradbury 100 greenback pound & Various topics discussed on the days event with the private meetings of folk from up and down the country who can't all be wrong about the gravity of the situation in the UK of the lack of Justice amongst other things.
NOVEMBER 23 2012 A PICTURE MESSAGE
A self explanatory photograph depicting what MPs really care about but when it comes to the care of the elderly or the protection of children what do they really care about? Mainstream politics is dead in the water, we need a new way forward which will include real Justice. Magna Carta 2015 & The British Constitution Group Annual meeting tomorrow Stoke on Trent we make a start on the real future for our children the elderly and the vulnerable not the snouts that are permanently in the troughs of our coffers.
NOVEMBER 20 2012 Emigration & Exchange rate Read about the problem with emigration and living from an exchange rate, just a sample of correspondence ignored and denied by the deputy.
NOVEMBER 20 2012 FACEBOOK
NOVEMBER 20 2012 FOLLOW UP LETTERS FROM COP Read em n weep!! We do!
NOVEMBER 20 2012 APPEAL what appeal?? Read how the C O P seem to be trying out tactics to confuse you about what appeal and when! Read the sealed refusal to appeal by Judge Jackson regarding the Judgement of the 24th October 2012 that is now recorded with the COURT of APPEAL in London.
NOVEMBER 20 2012 MORE LIES & DECEIPT PROOF Read evidence from the pension service of HUGH JONES informing them that mothers intention to return to live in the UK in total contradiction of the LIES he stated in the recorded meeting of the 18/7/2011 where he states he did not accept that we had emigrated! The recorded meeting to the right of this at the top of the column.
NOVEMBER 20 2012 MORE LIES & DECEIPT PROOF Read exhibits page 1 where original claim in the HIGH COURTS 1998 its states mums life expectancy at 83, and in HUGH JONES of PANNONEs LLP separate harassment claim against the carer Page 3 section 7, conducted unlawfully without consent and illegally in breach of Mental capacity act Section 5 where any carer is protected against any civil liability in connection with the care of a patient under the Act, disregarded by corrupt Judge, take note where they state by Partner Paul Jonson mums life expectancy has exceed the age predicted of 70 ie 10 years.
More proof of lies that they used to discredit me in their unlawful illegal trial of false harassment charges to threaten me with prison. The corrupt Judge was led to believe that our protest was not justified on these lied about grounds in which PANNONEs LLP charged my mother £26,377 to so called familiarise themselves with the case in which all papers where there to read.
Just cast an eye over Page 4 in which Hugh Jones's statement to the court himself chose to state a life expectancy on section 9 of 70. So how is the life expectancy being altered and changed to suit what their objectives are at the time.
Draw your own conclusions.
NOVEMBER 20 2012 BCG ANNUAL CONFERENCE Read ABOUT THE
BRITSIH CONSTITUTION ANNUAL CONFERENCE THIS SAT 24TH NOVEMEBR 2012. IF YOU REALLY WANT TO HELP CHANGE THE FUTURE FOR YOU AND ESPECIALLY YOUR CHILDREN PLEASE ATTEND.
NOVEMBER 20 2012 STOP COMMON PURPOSE Read and learn about whats happenning under your nose.
NOVEMBER 19 2012 On the 30th October 2012
NOVEMBER 19 2012 Read a further reply from PHSO showing intervention from higher authorities!!
NOVEMBER 19 2012 NO JUSTICE Read all about it by Roy Jenkins and keeping the snouts out of the trough.
NOVEMBER 18 2012 Read the letter from PHSO Alice Coral on the 3rd July 2012 where she asks for my mothers consent and authorisation. WHat games are being played now!
NOVEMBER 18 2012 Read A FURTHER LETTER TO PHSO ALICE CORAL
RE: Ombudsman ref: EN-135765
FURTHER FOLLOW UP EMAIL
Upon reading your letter in more detail I feel it only fair to update you further on the facts.
1.Mrs Clarke has made the complaint and you are well aware of that as stated on the 11.07.2012
2.I currently do not receive allowances from my mothers funds as my mothers funds have expired.
3.You have had my mothers authorisation in letters you asked for that were sent on the 11.07.2012
4.You was not aware of my new appointment as Executor in my mothers affairs where according to her ‘living will’ anyone whom stills claims incapacity as they do I STEP IN to assume Executor with all the powers that go with it.
5.As above I am my mother’s acting Personal Representative.
I trust the information I have sent to you this weekend and copied to our MP Gordon Marsden will ensure this investigation continues with the utmost of vigour.
The corruption fraud and wrong doing in this case is substantial.
ATTACHED IS A FURTHER SIGNED LETTER BY MS ANN CLARKE
LIVING WILL – EXECUTOR - Mike Clarke (PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE)
& THE AGGRIEVED - Ann Clarke
NOVEMBER 17 2012 Michael Clarke; The heads of damages allowed for a 'so-called' professional receiver 'HUGH JONES' was approx. £20,000 for the entire duration, Hugh Jones took £27,000 in his first year! He did this whilst hiding the facts from his client. It took 11 year to get a brief account of what he has took. The full accounts have been refused to mum. In the statement BELOW he gave the court, the judge, & the family assurances his costs would not ERRODE upon the heads of damages what was infact for mum and this is how he started his deputy ship of LIES and that is how it continued for 11 years with all the proof to offer that the COURT OF PROTECTION are trying to cover up and PROTECT HUGH JONES and them!! Now why do you think that is.. well the 1st duty is to the courts for the solicitor and courts probable first duty is to protect the deputy whilst the client can swing! would you consider the COURT OF PROTECTION [COP] to be a COURT OF NEGLECTION [CON]?
NOVEMBER 17 2012 Read the release of the near 12 year old 1st general order by Denzil Lush and in particular the highlighted paragraphs; and to remember currently HUGH JONES's charges have exceeded £150,000 plus a further £100,000 of mal administration where he failed to have financial jurisdiction whilst the client was in emigration and or by not providing a euro account in the country of residence in order to protect her against a devalueing exchange rate that Mrs Clarke was forced to live off for 4 years and more. The clear and concise Criminal Neglect which the court of protection is refusing to acknowledge or deal with is tantamount to FRAUD which is shown clearly in the courts own corrupt Judgements and orders favouring their own agent HUGH JONES! CORRUPTION AND FRAUD
NOVEMBER 16 2012 LATE REPLY FROM PHSO Read our response to her reply. What Alice Coral of the PHSO seems to be implying is that I am not a fit and proper person to be involved with this complaint? I think an EXECUTOR of a living will is more fit and proper than any other! As so happens I too believe there are several people involved with this case that are most certainly not fit and proper persons in which the truth will out in time. Has Alice Coral uncovered things that she has been told to cover up?
NOVEMBER 16 2012 Letter from PHSO Parliamentary Health & Service OMBUDSMAN Read how even the PHSO are trying to brush mum off. This letter is from PHSO containing a copy letter to our MP we also incorporate our reply today containing two copy letters sent to them from Mum and signed by mum which at the time is what they asked for on the 11th July 2012! So why are they now trying to back track? And if this is genuinely their answer then why has it took 4 months to send it? Has there been some judicial intervention ie., MORE CORRUPTION?
NOVEMBER 15 2012 ORIGINAL CLAIM RELEASED Read the original claim for £1.6 million and inparticular page 23 referring to the receivers costs applied for of £30,000 for the entire duration of the management of the estate! The claim was reduced in a compromised out of court settlement at £775,000 & HUGH JONES took nearly all of these fees in his first year. He further lied to the court, the judge and the family .... coming soon!
NOVEMBER 14@1600 2012 Read an email from Sister and brothers solicitor Simon Heapy after sending him a copy of the appeal.Will here to Read
NOVEMBER 14 2012 TIME OUT to APPEAL The court of Appeal say that the appelants appeal must be on their desk today and because the court of protection have not sent the sealed order that has got to be in that appeal it can only be lodged with an extension of time applied for... now ask yourself.. why is the court not sending the sealed orders in time to appeal they have had 21 days.. ANYWAY we hereby publish our skeleton arguement Read our appeal. This is our brief skeleton..
NOVEMBER email@example.com 2012 Phone call to COP Courts
02070715680 in the last 5 minutes I was speaking to the Royal Courts to find out what has happened to our appeal made on the 20th August 2012 against section 3 of the order of the 31st July 2012 and they informed me after some confusion that they have been informed that the file is due back from the courts in Manchester with directions that will be sent to us in writing this week. So, is it normal for it to take 3 months for them to give directions to an appeal request!! Lets see whats in this...
NOVEMBER 13@1315 2012 Phonecall to Appeal Courts
02079476533 in a conversation today to the Court of Appeal I explain that our time to appeal in the recent judgement of the 24th October 2012 runs out tomorrow and our delay is outside our control due to the obstruction by court of protection officials whom appear to be delaying the sending of the sealed order presumeably to prevent an appeal. The lady concerned explained that we must tick the box to apply for extension of time and submit these reasons that are obviously no fault of our own and there will be no problem. Does all this not show how the court of protection are manipulating behind the scenes to make the whole process awkward and nearly unmanageable for a layman so that their efforts will hopefully pay off and one might give up. Well not this one!
NOVEMBER 13 2012 Read A SAMPLE OF PROOF now released that the solicitor receiver deputy HUGH JONES of PANNONE LLP never did the work he said he did at the beginning in 2001 where he charged my mother in the first year £26,377 to peruse all documentation to gain the knowledge to predict his financial assessments based on her predicted life span that he claimed was 70 years of age and where I have constantly claimed but been ignored that her documents will reveal the actual prediction was 83 years of age and this document proves this and shows Mr HUGH JONES did not spend his time going over the documents at all to find this information, so what did he spend £26,377.00 on ???
NOVEMBER 13 2012 Read our email enquiry as to what has happened to our first appeal to section 3 of the order of the 31st July 2012 in which we have heard nothing from the court of protection!! Read the appeal this link where nothing has happened. Copy of the order here to read on page 11 section 3 where the judge states mum does not have capacity to make the decision on whether to sell her house or keep it. Read the judgement/order. This was appealed above but nothing has happened. The appeal was made and acknowledged.. there was a delay in getting the proof for fee remission from HUGH JONES but was sent in and acknowledged by COP representative Jemima Ndow-Coker and then after that to date NOTHING!!!!! ???????? the court of neglection have chose to conveniently shelve it??? Now why has that happened??? This order was not about mum s house it was about her capacity that our doctors claim she has!! Incidentally 4 of them!! MORE CORRUPTION PROOF
NOVEMBER 13 2012 Read
AN OPEN LETTER TO ED MILIBAND: Spreading such open letters as this addressed to one more whore politician hopefully will bring peoples attention to the harm corrupt secret courts are doing to families and society as a whole. Whether paedophile child trafficking judges of the Family Court or corrupt spiv judges of the Court of Protection with their sleazy fingers in the pie of Guardianship Fraud
NOVEMBER 12 2012 Read how the Court of Protection obstruct the appeal process by delaying sending the sealed orders that you need in order to file an appeal which is due to run out of time!
MORE CORRUPTION PROOF
NOVEMBER 11 2012 A woman now free from the receiver deputy HUGH JONES whom thinks he has got away with what he has done. Whilst mum relaxed this week in Spain we have returned today to continue to persue justice for her and the re-instatement of the funds missing from her estate by the corruption that has dogged her and me for years. We will continue this fight until we get the answers and not least all the full accounts constantly asked for but refused access to.
NOVEMBER 3 2012 What the FUQ FREQUENTLY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
The corruption lies deceit and fraud is going on worldwide watching this video is like looking in a mirror of our own events in the UK. We are all being deceived and our wealth being stolen from us.
NOVEMBER 2 2012 UPDATE on Mothers Plight My mother remains as I do adamant that justice will continue to be sought into 2013. She has been robbed not only of her dignity, but also financially raped, by secret courts and corrupt agents. We will continue this fight until we see action taken to remedy these issue's that have blighted her life and mine beyond recognition. We currently are formulating an appeal against Judge Jacksons recent order on costs and are considering our next course of action upon the PUBLIC GUARDIAN CEO alongside its agent PANNONE LLP HUGH JONES.
The actions being considered are more protesting outside the offices of PANNONES, the civil petitioning of lawsuits against the courts and Pannones and other options available to us to force the full disclosure of all accounts that sre still remaining a secret to this day that HUGH JONES claims there is nothin wrong with. Then if this is so why are we being denied the disclosure of such? You are hiding behind the word privacy and you are using this to shield the wrong doing that needs exposure. My mother was denied access to her own funds for her to gain legal representation whilst the persons against her were freely paid their costs from her estate delayed till death for me to pay!
There is and are fundamental flaws in the corrupt system to hand where lawful jury courts are denied, where the bar is judgeing the bar in clear conflict and where the cover up of fraud, mal administration theft and criminal neglect continues with impunity. We may have managed to obtain maintain and keep a roof over our heads but these matters until remedy is given we will not give up on.
NOVEMBER 1 2012
Important Announcement - A Major Initiative
“Magna Carta 2015”
A New Governing Body
It is now 40 years since the Conservative government under Edward Heath's leadership enacted The European Communities Act 1972 marking the UK's accession to the European Economic Community and the start of the process of dismantling the sovereignty of our nation. This process has diminished the authority of parliament making it the servant of a foreign legislative body not directly elected by the British people.
No parliament has ever been granted the authority by the people to diminish its own status and yet the collective political establishment accept this to be the case without objection. It is self-evident that the people are not happy with this arrangement and in the face of a blanket refusal by the political establishment to address this issue it is now deemed appropriate for the people themselves to take matters into their own hands and declare the reinstatement of our national sovereignty – without reference to parliament - it having surrendered its sovereignty and thus its right to govern.
OCTOBER 30 2012 FAcebook Entry by; Aj Hollis... From experience if you do find honest representations it will be warned off or corrupted by the criminal element that infests the British Government, Judiciary, police and legal profession. One can see the extreme extent of corruption in the courts with the protection of Masonic paedophile rings from senior police, treasonous Judges and predators in the child protection service. The Court of Protection criminally supports guardianship fraud as a matter of absolute complicity, just as the family court is an active participant in child trafficking.
The first time I heard of the Court of Protection was in Australia in the early 90s when the partner of a friend that worked in security told me how he was hired as a minder by a visiting British lawyer. This lawyer claimed to be working for the Court of Protection and was in Australia to track down a UK expat that had inherited a large sum of money that they had decided he wasn’t entitled to. Once the lawyer mistakenly felt that he had the right man for the job, he offered ‘S’ a considerable sum to murder the Expat. This is the level of behaviour that these type of unscrupulous parasites will stoop to Mike. I have not given up getting back into contact with S.
In regard to our case Putin and Minihane of Burroughs Day act without regard to how blatant their fraud and racketeering has been as they believe they will be protected by creatures that like them and Jones have no sense of rational common decency. I know that a number of the criminals that have targeted are freemasons and suspect that most if not all are. If you look into Freemasons you will understand exactly why Franco hunted them down and executed them on the spot. I don’t care whether the majority of low ranking masons are good old boys; the reality is that the lower ranks are a testing ground to discover those of a criminal nature with the devious intelligence not to be caught. The hierarchy of the legal profession works in a similar fashion as the Freemasons. The firms that are most powerful are the ones that behave with the greatest criminality. In these firms they weed out honest junior lawyers by forcing them to clock up an unreasonable number of billing hours each week. The juniors have three choices; one is to try find a rare job with a smaller honest law firm, second is to work in excess of a 100hrs a week or third is to cheat clients by falsifying their billing hours. It is those that make the third choice that these firms wish to retain and it is these sort of firms that fill the ranks of lawyers for the elderly and guardianship parasites.
In our case the predation of my mother escalated on the death of her partner when corrupt West Country lawyer Jeremy Thring tried to foist an old superseded Will on her, having failed in that fraudulent attempt he then proceeded to take most of a decade to complete the probate process and make my mothers life a misery. During that time a cabal of corrupt professionals subjected her to what is now dubbed “gang torture’. When I first returned from Australia I thought my brother must be making up his extreme claims and this sadly damaged our relationship and played into the hands of the parasites. However the underhanded actions of corrupt lawyers and other snakes have shown him to be entirely correct.
Even the offices of the renowned Australian Human rights lawyer ‘Jeffrey Robertson’ fails to respond to my brother’s communications even though he has supplied documented proof of the orchestrated criminality of the guardianship office and numerous parasitic lawyers working under the protection of the entirely corrupt Court of Protection racket. The corrupt office of the official solicitor that was instrumental in the absolute fraud that robbed Lee of his home also pocketed $17,000 of our money for a rubberstamp to the corruption, two forged Wills written by two sets of corrupt lawyers, threats stopping us maintaining our own properties so they could be given the impression of dereliction so the properties could be sold to corrupt associates of the false Executors for land value only.
They have used a corrupt lawyer in Marbella whose website indicates another Masonic connection. At first they attempted to corrupt the Spanish land registry but instead when that failed they installed squatters to use ‘adverse possession’ to try to have our last property transferred in their names then on sold in a shady deal to the squatter whose brother in-law is already in jail for property fraud. We have had our lawyer and accountant in Spain both beaten up while dealing with our property for us. We have had an Insurance company “Towergate” take £1000s given to them by Burroughs Day in policy payments so high that they can only be seen as more racketeering. Yet Towergate refuse to give any information from their loss adjusters report to help us confirm the false executor’s involvement was reason for the rejection of our claim for thefts and damage to our property in Spain.
With these things in mind you can understand why even the honest Lawyers and Judges keep their heads down and why you would be led down the path of bankruptcy if you get caught up in legal fiction. The system has been corrupted beyond repair and there needs to be a cleansing that won’t come from playing their game.
OCTOBER 29 2012 BEING ADVISED by
Friends connected whom work within the court system who are strongly advising against the common law stuff and obtaining a solicitor, after taking their advise and doing exactly that I am finding it difficult to obtain that representation and not for the first time. After speaking to several solicitors companies it seems that its easy to say it but putting it into practice is another matter. Like I said to the Judge, I never wanted to be 'Mike of the family Clarke' but the lack of obtaining a judicial platform to go up against what is effectively like dealing with the 'British Mafia' is proving almost impossible to do. I ask? what does a person have to do in this country to obtain justice, and if you cannot get it then what other options are left remaining. Common law still stands in this country, so why not have it? This matter is unresolved. A large practice of solicitors in Manchester called PANNONE LLP are feeling that they have got away scot free with what they have done, combined with the CEO of THE Office of PUBLIC GUARDIAN backed by COURT officials of the so called COURT of protection. They are not protecting the vulnerable they are financially raping them! This website will not be closed until justice has been seen to be done, you will not get away with the financial rape of my mother without paying the god given price. The system has robbed my mother out of the funds here accused of. LEGALISED FRAUD! PANNONE LLP claim to have what I describe as, an unlawful INJUNCTION, against me making my claims on the internet or otherwise, that I continue to do, without facing the threat of prison!! These people have conducted themselves in clear breach and violation of Mental Capacity Act section 5, knowingly, with impunity! They have violated their own statute laws without a care in the world. I have been subjected alongside my mother to years of intentional infliction of emotional distress, again with impunity. These people are animals. Put me before a common law jury court to tell my story I say, and we will see who will be doing time! They also believe they have stopped our commercial lien claim listed here on this website. This is basically commerce, as with any other commerce and cannot be stopped!
OCTOBER 25 2012 RESPONSE FROM THE JUDGE Dear Mr Clarke,
The judge thanks you for your letter but asks me to respond that he has given his decision and is not able to enter into further correspondence.
OCTOBER 25 2012 CRIMINAL LAWYER RESPONSE
As I said in my recent text, ‘Wow’. Very interesting and despite last night’s reservations about the site, it’s actually very well put together and informative. I've considered some issues/articles in a cursory fashion whilst others in a more thorough and detailed manner. Let me say from the outset that I can see the validity in your allegations and issues that you take. The difficulty here (as far as my own involvement is concerned) is that I am a Criminal Appeals Lawyer and not a Civil Petitioner. The most recent Judgement suggests matters that I could assist in clarifying but ultimately it would serve no other purpose other than to seek to firmly establish your Mother’s wishes. The key issues here however are the theft and corruption allegations which I find realistic and full of substance. The reading of your site caused me to raise an eyebrow on more than one occasion.
Unfortunately, this is not something that I could assist you with. It is beyond my area of expertise and knowledge and would no doubt take over a large part of both my business and family life. A pleasant chat over a few drinks in a pub is quite the opposite of the reality of this situation. Its a fight that I sincerely wish and hope that you and your supporters win and in doing so, I hope it brings about an end to such mal practice and legalised fraud. Regretfully I cant assist Mike but I sincerely wish you every success.
OCTOBER 24 2012 Facebook Observer entry Frankly these creatures through threats of trespass claim an authority to move outside of common law to protect a contrived right for protected criminals to defraud decent people. There are now tens of thousands of decent citizens that recognize the absolute criminality of our terrorist government and the whore Judiciary. It is approaching a time where the treasonous criminality of these parasites will force the population to take the law back into there own hands and put end to this railroad to fascist dictatorship.
OCTOBER 24 2012 Read a reply from the judge that leave to appeal will not be granted. Dear Mr Clarke
Thank you for your email. The Judge has asked me to inform you that court judgments are not sealed. You will however receive a copy of the sealed order from the court in due course.
If you wish to appeal, you need not wait for this sealed order. You will need permission to bring an appeal, which should normally first be sought from the trial judge and then, if refused, from the Court of Appeal.
To assist, Mr Justice Peter Jackson indicates that he does not grant permission to appeal ( please see the attached certificate), so any application for permission should now be made to the Court of Appeal.
OCTOBER 24 2012 Today our case is being examined by a criminal lawyer whom specialises in miscarriages of justice reversals.
OCTOBER 23 2012 Read the Judges order for costs for both parties to be attached to my mothers house that will force a sale upon her death that we now launch another appeal on the grounds that full disclosure requested has been dismissed. It's amazing that under article 6 of human rights entitles a person to a fair and impartial hearing but yet when claimed in court this was not a fair and impartial court it was dismissed. It then went on against claims of non representation due to HUGH JONES obstructing the use of her own monies for representation but yet my sister and brother were allowed representation and HUGH JONESs costs for representation are ALL covered from mums estate what part of this do they not understand is corrupt. This they would not get away with under a common law court with a jury. The judge claims my conduct is poor, I claim at least I am honest!
OCTOBER 22 2012 Read our response to the Judge as requested about HUGH JONES and the relatives costs submissions and our advice to the Judge on Trust LAW where I as executor and beneficiary to that trust take precedence over that Judge & thus where his own position is reflected as TRUSTEE. Orders are given to the Judge and if not complied with he will be in breach of that trust!
OCTOBER 18 2012 Read HUGH JONES costs statement that he also wants to charge on to the property.
OCTOBER 18 2012 A BILL PRESENTED TO THEIR OWN MOTHER Read about a sister and brother whom had representation in court of their own solicitor where my mother was denied & deprived access to her own funds to pay for her own representation and that they now want their solicitors expenses £4,400 attaching to my mothers property as a charge. UNBELIEVABLE. They sat in court objecting to my mothers wishes in which my mother holds doctors reports confirming her capacity but yet they want her to pay for their own costs!! What does that tell you? Their ultimate objective of course by delaying its effect until my mothers death is such that they can then increase their inheritance from forcing upon me not only the cost of mothers burial probably £2500 but also her financial gifts to them of £2000 plus these charges of £4400 so the expected monies needed to be found by me upon mothers death would be in the region of £10,000 or they can then force a sale of what would then become my house!! SICK
OCTOBER 18 2012 PHSO LETTER Read an update from PHSO Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman investigations and our reply.
OCTOBER 10 2012 In Relation to COSTS Read our application for interim orders to be made to force disclosure of all accounts alongside other important matters before assessing costs.
OCTOBER 9 2012 SUCCESS THE FINAL JUDGEMENT Read the final judgement today. Mother is elated & as such we state we have already moved back from Spain though we retain a holiday home in Spain. We also state to the Judge that Mike and James are about sign up our limited company for the lease of a nightclub in Blackpool that we fully believe will provide for our future requirements over and above the house generated income that we currently have increased since our last statement from £13000 to £20000. Having now discharged the receivership of HUGH JONES we can get on with the business of living life to a fuller level.
SEPTEMBER 29 2012 Read about more unhappiness nationwide with regard to unlawful courts and the growing rebellion to it!
SEPTEMBER 26 2012 How it really is...
SEPTEMBER 19 2012 Channel 4 TV Further contact today with Channel 4 that for the purposes of confidentiality cannot be revealed at this time.
2012 Facebook Comments That are very relevant
SEPTEMBER 19 2012 Posted and emailed the SUPREME COURT of appeal fee exemption form cop44a sent to court of protection.
SEPTEMBER 19 2012 Read an urgent request for a response as this is the 4th request sent to Hugh Jones.
SEPTEMBER 18 2012 @ 14.50pm Watch the debate of The Self Directed Support Bill that is to be debated in the Scottish Parliament this afternoon at 2.50pm. The bill will affect carers and we have briefed MSPs about issues of concern to carers (the difficulties of accessing different choices and employing family members for example).
SEPTEMBER 18 2012 How REAL Justice cannot be AVOIDED Issued yesterday 17th September 2012, UNDER COMMON LAW. It is an honor and a privilege to be a fellow human bearing witnessing to your amazing resolve to hold people who believe they are immune to the same laws as? the rest of us based on power and money. Their crimes are apprehensible at the very least.
SEPTEMBER 17 2012 Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman Read PHSO update on their continued investigation into the OPG & Hugh Jones.
SEPTEMBER 16 2012 Life ‘O’ Riley
My family believe I, as mum’s carer, have a Life ‘O’ Riley.
Let’s now go and scrutinise this so-called Life ‘O’ Riley.
1. I don’t smoke but my mother does. I respect her choice to that and I don’t restrict that choice in any way. She smokes as she desires and sees fit. This has resulted in my 16 years of being what’s known as a secondary smoker where the upshot is lung damage showing on my x-rays in a private consultation about breathing problems.
2. I clock watch when not in my mother’s presence, something known in the world of carers; your mind will not let you away from the care when in fact you are away.
3. I would like to have rampant sex in my own private house where I could swing from the chandeliers or jump off the wardrobes in privacy, screaming to the delight of that privacy but this ended 16 years ago.
4. I regularly on occasion am called to the toilet to assist with the removal of a stool that is causing discomfort to my mother that I without worry or cause for concern assist and make light of it to my mother when in reality I really just want to heave and be sick. Likewise if we are totally unlucky and her stool has turned to liquid causing a mess very few could deal with I just make light and get on with the care and cleaning process.
5. Though I have lived 4 and a half years in Spain I have only once been to the beach for a pick nick and that was whilst waiting for visiting hours when mum was admitted to hospital for a suspected stroke, otherwise I do not feel I can leave her for any long period.
6. In recent years she wears Tenna pants due to slight incontinence which require in some instances replacing twice a day where sometimes the stench of urine can sometimes be overpowering to the point of feeling sick and your stomach wants to heave.
7. I & my partner long for respite for us both but because our families believe we have a life O riley will not provide any assistance of any description it has only been close friends.
8. We cannot plan for a proper holiday due to the costs implications of paying for mum if she comes or paying for mums care if she doesn’t.
9. Whilst dinning out mum may have some slight accidents where her food might dribble down her and needs to have assistance to that eating process this is not only embarrassing it also is hardly setting a scene for a nice meal out to be enjoyed as one would, if alone.
10. Whilst out mum requires to go to the toilet like we all do but this can be a challenging situation at the best of times where depending on the venue, whether their facilities are accessible for a wheelchair etc.
11. Getting ready to go out needs enormous motivation as you realise not only have you to get yourself ready, you then have to get mum ready, requiring bathing and blow drying her hair and doing her nails etc.
12. Whilst out and about just having to push a wheel chair around for 16 years takes an enormous amount of commitment and courage.
13. Bathing mum is a heavy and hard task that needs doing regular to avoid any complications of sores etc.
14. Trying to balance your own life what there is left, with trying to maintain hers, is again a very challenging situation needing great resolve and stamina to maintain a staying power of commitment to the care of that individual not just for a day, a week or a month, but for years and years.
15. When mum wakes if it’s before you then you need to get up to assist.
Just a fraction of the tasks to hand!
Do you think you can do it?
Do you think it’s a Life ‘O’ Riley?
SEPTEMBER 16 2012 Snapshot of my life before 1996
I had given up my 4 businesses to care 24/7 for mum. My life as a nightclub entreprenaur was over, with all its trappings of celebrity encounters of which there were many, pictured above Sarah Lancashire(Rachel) from Coronation St, March 1996 in my nightclub that was closed 3 months after this photo. My businesses that I dropped were a security fence and shutter business, an 18 bedroomed student accomodation house, an overland tour business in Africa and not least of all my nightclub. I was probably at peak period of business potential. The care needed to give my mother some level of quality and mobility back to her life needed a 24/7 attendance, which was given. It was a life changing decision that was to cost me dearly. To this day 16 years later it still is costing me dear, through critisism and chastisement and various corrupt processes we are having to continually endure. Life without my mothers award of money was easier without it. So what if, I currently drive a Jaguar, I drove one before & incidenatly so did my mother! So what if I have a rented villa in Spain with a swimming pool, I & my mother deserve one! My life choices are mine and my mothers are hers. Please respect that to all those that don't! You know who you are!
SEPTEMBER 16 2012 SNAPSHOT of care and history 1997 After coming into my care in 1996 mum was doubly incontinent, she was permanently reliable on 24 hr care for everything. Her legs were stuck with spasticity at 90 degrees. The doctors said she would never walk again. They offered to cut the tendons so she could sleep better where the legs would then be floppy to allow them to be a horizontal position but I refused to accept she would not walk again. They said they could half cut the ham strings, stretch the legs to a straightish position in a 2 part opertation to try and get her to walk but from experience these cases failed and the spasticity would return. I would not authorise the full cut and only authorised a half cut in two operations and promised I would succeed to make her walk. On the 11th of July 1997 this picture was took & I over a very long period of devotion and perseverance did get her to walk again. The doctors were astonished. She retrained her toilet activities and after a year, had regained her mobility and her incontinence had gone. SUCCESS. This I might add was done single handed.
SEPTEMBER 15 2012 Devoted son & mother prior to accident 1994
Taken on the Costa Del Sol whilst severe problems in mums marriage to my father had started we scooted off to the Costa for R&R (rest & recuperation). The devotion to a mother that was there back then trying to help her through what was to turn out to be a bitter divorce and an onset to severe depression leading to her tragic suicide attempts that unfolded into life changing events for her and for me.
SEPTEMBER 15 2012 HUGH JONES STATEMENT Read the released final submission statement of HUGH JONES to Judge Jackson. Read also a final submission statement of 2 pages to Judge Jackson from Brother sister Angie / Kevin
SEPTEMBER 14 2012 Read our final submission to JUDGE JACKSON. Our internet service has been offline in Spain for the past 14 days due to taking a new contract out on a new villa that we have moved into, we apologise for the delays. Due to further requests by court of protection officials to fill in more forms regarding mums appeal to the supreme courts we have travelled back to the UK to complete these and lodge them. Take note it has taken them 3 weeks from the 20th August 2012 to telephone us to request further forms filled in and here we release the phone call shortly... We have 2 further submission statements from HUGH JONES and sister Angela/Brother Kevin to be placed here later today. LIVING WILL.. On July 28, 2009, Barack Obama became the first United States President to announce publicly that he had a living will and to encourage others to do the same. He told an AARP town meeting, "So I actually think it's a good idea to have a living will. I'd encourage everybody to get one. I have one; Michelle has one. And we hope we don't have to use it for a long time, but I think it's something that is sensible.".... Mothers living will is now in operation and within our submission to the Judge it states that any threat to her estate by way of capacity issue's the Executor of her living will is to step in as I have to remind the Judge that her property and estate must remain intact without the sale of her house and also we have demanded detailed accounts from the receiver over 11 years to have those forensically examined.
SEPTEMBER 7 2012 Mums favourite dish
Friday special 'fish & chips' mums favourite dish on the Costa at our local restaurant at Lauro Golf, LaRisa. A picture of health against all abusive comments made from others with underlying motives. A facebook message from an observer ... Hiya hunni, as an outsider and not involved in this rift I can see from ur pics that ur mum is a picture of health and looks really, really well, it's awful what's been going on on ur page with jealous relatives, I can plainly see that u love ur mum very much ad she looks brill, keep it up hunni ur doin a grand job smile ps didn't want to write on ur wall and get a load ov abuse lots ov love to u and ur mum xxxxxxxxxxx
SEPTEMBER 1 2012 Observer Comments Comment:
Well I've been critical of you when i think in my view you've been wrong.
But how stupid is your sisters daughter. I read that Facebook stuff, utterly ridiculous to post that crap. To be fair the stuff from your partner was poor as well, does he talk in 'txt' speak all the time ? He should show some class and keep out of it, just let that chavvy niece of yours do all the talking as every post she writes puts you in a very good light !
As you say it really was the Jeremy Kyle show, the state of their english was appalling !!!
But just like many celebs you read about, how stupid are people to argue online (specially with you !) as you'll then show it all on your website. With this court case ongoing you would think your sister/her daughter would bite their lip and stay out of it until the ruling.
I must admit after reading all that Facebook stuff i'm beginning to change my view ! That stupid girl came across as some silly stupid chav, scary to think shes now a carer.
AUGUST 30 2012 POSITION STATEMENT Read HUGH JONES statement of position advocating the sale of mums property against her wishes!
AUGUST 29 2012 The tale of two letters.... Read These two letters show the level of vexatious matters that we have to endure because we are overseen daily by courts and vexatious family, scrutinised constantly. All of course usually based and laced with ulterior motives to suit other peoples ends one way or another. My mother and I after 16 years still cannot proceed to enjoy under article 8 of Human Rights a private life without being the subject of an intense barrage of family and government vexatious dirty work in order to discredit the relationship of mother and son any way possible. This website is here to expose what an individual faces along the way and the sheer unadulterated discomfort it provides that I might add will not break us.
AUGUST 28 2012 Read the controversial, last will & testament.
AUGUST 27 2012 Position Statement POSITION STATEMENT released and sent to Channel 4 Television, PHSO Parliamentary Health AND Service Ombudsman, Hugh Jones, Simon Heapy And Judge Jackson.
AUGUST 26 2012 A daughter with a guilty consience Text updates and if you read Angie's solicitors position statement a little lower down you will see the evidence of where she is backing the potential theft of her own mothers home to try and force her mother into care!! Can you imagine, forcing your own mother out of her own home thats she wants to stay in till her death, against her will, placing her into strangers care again against her will?? I shudder to think?? Well it will be a cold day in hell Angie when you get that wish whilst I'm alive!!
AUGUST 24 2012 Facebook 9pm
AUGUST 23 2012 Release of appeal application To Read here.
AUGUST 23 2012 Brother and Sister's position Read Angie and Kevin's solicitors postion statement,
AUGUST 23 2012 Update from PHSO Read an update from the PHSO Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman investigation.
AUGUST 22 2012 Sister texts Read A barrage of insultive texts from my sister today published here. It is assumed that her anger stems from the exposure she is sufffering from the lack of thoughts or care for her own mother with regard to her failure to send birthday wishes and or likewise recent mothers day thoughts also not expressed, exposed on this site to demonstrate her complete lack of consideration to her own mother!
AUGUST 22 2012 Channel 4 contact Telephone calls from Channel 4 today have been made but total privacy has been asked to be respected so as not to jeopardise their further ongoing enquieries and therefore I cannot comment at this time on their content!!
AUGUST 20 2012 WILL UPDATE A further will update has been made after seeking further lawful and legal advice on the ongoing current threat to my mothers life choices, in breach of article 8 of her Human Rights, of where she lives and with whom, concerning the still ongoing threat from the governments agents of juristocracy dictatorship & corruption within its vehicle, the Court of Protection / Office of the Public Guardian.
AUGUST 20 2012 Appeal to Supreme Court Setion 3 of the Judges declaration has been requested to be sent for appeal to the supreme court. This application will be published here to read.
AUGUST 13 2012 Phone call from an angry, mothers sister, Rhoda Listen to an angry sister about her being brought into what she terms as our family dispute not giving much regard to the sister that helped raise her as a child and whom now needs her help and she turns her back. Even though she re-iterates clearly she does not want her sister in a home.
AUGUST 13 2012 Phone calls & texts from CHANNEL 4 TV This morning Bronagh Walsh whom is now awaiting producer permission to come and complete a filmed interview of my mother and me before returning to Spain in what will be a television program on the corruption faced by us from court of protection officials and the legalised theft from the vulnerable authorised by a juristocracy dictatorship of corruption. Bronaghs Text: Hi. Still waiting on producer coming back to me ref meeting. How much longer will you be in the UK?? Is there any update. Our reply: Hi we will be here one more week. We have published the recent court hearing to listen to on our websites. we are seeking legal help today from Age UK due to my mother being denied legal representation so as to formulate an appeal to the supreme court. Mums receiver deputy Hugh Jones has been paid out of mums estate to represent himself to object to her application whilst he also refuses her to gain access to her own funds to obtain legal representation of her own!!! How corrupt is that?? All mentioned to the judge whom did nothing about it?? Mike & Ann.
AUGUST 12 2012 Phone call to mothers sister Rhoda release Listen to a thank you call for sending a birthday card to mum. Rhoda who lives in Southern Ireland is my mums sister whom you will hear states on this call she does not want to see Ann sent off to a home!
AUGUST 12 2012 Phone call to mothers sister Kathleen Listen to a thank you call for sending a birthday card to mum. Mums other sister Kath who lives in London whom states that yes Mike you have done all the care why should there be a problem? Mum has other relatives whom side with her.
AUGUST 12 2012 Court hearing release Listen to the SECOND hearing of the 6th July 2012 where Judge Jackson tries to claim that common law jurisdiction is not to be given in administrative hearings but upon hearing our refusal of consent he proceeds anyway.
AUGUST 9 2012 After waiting 11 years Mum makes her will to start her 72nd birthday, without receiving any birthday cards or messages of happy birthday from her daughter and younger son. And here we publish it on August 12th.
AUGUST 4 2012 Court hearing release Listen to the first hearing of the 12th March 2012 where Judge Jackson tries to claim that consent is not required in administrative hearings but upon hearing our refusal of consent he proceeds anyway. Listen to his confirmation that he has read our position statement linked here confirming in writing that we do not consent but again he continues overiding our request for common law justice with equal piers to judge. Listen to the perversion of justice by trying to imply its my application when its my mothers. Note how he states he is acting on his oath of office that in fact is incompabtible (link to Read) to the terms of the oath where statute legislation is concerned. Note where he refers that really he has not got the time for this case and that nor is their sufficient money and he states in reality there are bigger problems elsewhere to deal with! Note how he promises a proper investigation but yet at the end he hands back the evidence dossier. Note how he states to forget the fact its a special visitor! Note how he will again state he has other things to be getting on with but that yes he is concious that my mother s life is ticking away but yet this application drags on and on from November 2011! Take also note that a mother with 4 doctors reports stating her capacity and that how the Judge from the 'BAR' can judge the deputy another member of the 'BAR' as doing no wrong and that he has seen or heard nothing in these appearances to indicate anything wrong. He continues to claim my mothers incapacity with only the one court doctor in his slight favour on only one issue. How can 4 reports against 1 win? Is their court bias and why? We will publish the recent court hearing of the 6th July 2012 where it can clearly be seen to demonstrate complete ambiguity and where if one reads between the lines something has happened after leaving that courtroom to sway the judges view that took nealry one month, in where if it had been as requested a common law court of equal piers, that would not have transpired!! Conclusion CORRUPTION
AUGUST 2 2012 Read about applications to appeal to the supreme court.
AUGUST 1 2012 Response updated 05.08.12 to Judge Jackson that we intend to appeal to the Supreme Court with an initial statement of response enclosed.
JULY 31 2012 Judges AMBIGUOUS Order Read the long awaited Judge Jacksons deliberation. Yet another major blow for my mother and me!!! Only one word to describe the £5000 procedure, as, ambiguous!!
JULY 30 2012 Channel 4 TV Listento a 46 minute telephone conversation with Channel 4 TV Bronagh Walsh today at lunchtime.
JULY 30 2012 Channel 4 TV Read contact today with Channel 4 TV Bronagh Walsh whom now wants the statement up date.
JULY 28 2012 Mother & Son that will not be seperated by statute controls - as we stand under the Magna Carta
JULY 28 2012 John Harris of TPUC
JULY 28 2012 Guy Taylor Vs Corrupt Judges 18th April 2012
JULY 28 2012 AnaJinn Read how the priminister ignores and does nothing about letters of complaint.
"There are no risk management procedures because, with no accountability, there is no risk. The same applies for the professional Deputies. There is no accountability because there is no due process, and therefore no recourse."
JULY 2012 Read about A Petition
Thursday 9 February 2012
presented to the House but not read on the Floor
Mentally Incapacitated Persons (Rights of Carers to Financial Information)
The Petition of Antoinette Mary Tricker,
JULY 28 2012 DOLs Read about deprovation of liberty orders scandal!
JULY 28 2012 Channel 4 Yesterday making further enquiries with all
Phil passed your details to me.
We are very interested in investigating the corruption within the court of
I have read the emails you have sent to Phil and was wondering if you had an
connections with families who are fighting for their rights in the court of
Could you pass my details to them, or ask them to contact me with regard to
Let me know as soon as you can if this is possible as we are keen for this
My details are firstname.lastname@example.org and my number is 07795620236.
Bronagh Walsh of Channel 4 TV
JULY 28 2012 The Law Society Understanding with Police Read about the understanding between the police and the law society!
JULY 27 2012 Roger of the family Hayes - Contact via Skype [09:24:23] roger of the family hayes: Hi Mike - I am currently working on a private prosecution against the whole Birkenhead Magistartes court - or key officials - because they are collectively denying us justice en mass - you might like to do the same for your stuff. The principle here of course is that the legal profession are treating the court system as a personal feifdom and making judgements to benfeit their own fraternity... without the safeguards of a jury. I'll keep you posted
[09:33:33] Michael of the family Clarke: yes please do! I am very interested and very keen to do just the same so please keep me up to date and informed.. Mike
JULY 26 2012 Read ABOUT the DARK CABAL & how "All Truth passes thru three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident." ~ Arthur Schopenhauer Perhaps the British Court of Protection Racket and the Office of Public Gaurdianship should be dealt with this way
JULY 26 2012 PANNONE email eMAIL TODAY from PANNONE referring to weekly payments or should I say the lack of!!
JULY 25 2012 Declaration of Independance A new initiative to re-assert the Magna Carta as a declaration of independance from 'statute systems of injustice' is to be announced soon, called, Magna Carta 2015, by the British Constitution Group. We support such initiatives here, whole heartedly.
JULY 24 2012 Friend Gordon's Birthday celebration in Benalmedina curry restaurant for his 29th followed by entertainment at the Bonanza Bar with the MyKool Buble tribute act by our other friend Tony Montanna.
JULY 23 2012 Roger Hayes live on UK Column Released from prison where he served 21 days unlawfully!!
JULY 22 2012 Read about court of protection advice & a link to Read about LPA's.
JULY 19 2012 GUY TAYLOR ON COMMON LAW X2
JULY 19 2012 Kidnap of children!! What about our elderly!! Is no-one caring about those kidnaps!! Read about it NOW! Why do you think we live in exile?? Waiting to find out what the state thinks it might have in store for my mother, which trust me, will not take place whilst I breath! Whilst HUGH JONES still holds back funds he owes me from nearly a year ago of £4000, he hords it, to now pay for "his state sponsored terrorism meetings" on how to inflict further pain and discomfort on the elderly, all in the interest of plundering that persons remaining asset, trying to stop the elderly person from displacing that property to where it should rightfully go! Who has incapacity? Remind me again? For those whom trespass against us shall indeed experience the same!!
JULY 18 2012 Dinner out
tonight with our guests Gordon, Laura and Jessica here with us on holiday for 10 days, and as the night wore on so did the funny photos.
JULY 18 2012 Mother still patiently waiting for a response from Judge Jackson, been 12 days now. Today also is the 1 year old meeting with HUGH JONES in which was recorded where he indicated selling my mothers property here to listen to. And also a brief transcription Read
JULY 12 2012 Email to HUGH JONES & OPG Read yesterdays email to Hugh Jones & OPG re detailed accounts, outstanding monies owed and weekly payments not responded to, in fact not responded to any of it.
JULY 11 2012 Facebook entries
JULY 10 2012 Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman Read the signed request for PHSO investigation into these allegations that the OPG has failed to do. Sent today.
JULY 10 2012 Release of the full statement click here to the court on Friday 06.07.2012 in my mother's application to be released from the Court of Protection.
Our fight to set mum free and to gain some justice we had to turn to the Magna Carta Act s39 and the Bill of Rights and claim common law jurisdiction in court on the 06.07.2012 and we are still awaiting deliberation. Take note that in court it was mentioned that this hearing has probably cost my mother in excess of £5000, yes £5000 to hold such a hearing where upon without any representation was to be accepted and the whole process flawed from start to finish in which my mother has to pay for!! Add the £5000 to the £127,000 that the deputy has removed in undisclosed charges and add to that the claim of mal administration of exchange rate losses exceeding £100,000 we are at an overall cost to my mother of £232,000 without any forensic analysis of the entire £1.1 million that has gone through the hands of the deputy? Alarming isn't it! When you consider how many more years mother might of been in funds had it not of been for the frauds committed against her all in the name of
THE COURT OF PROTECTION.
JULY 8 2012 In the court waiting area Manchester High Court Events 06.07.2012
In the waiting area of the court the deputy HUGH JONES came over to say;
HJ-“There is every indication that your application today will fail and so we have to talk money”
MC-“Sorry, I don’t understand”
HJ-“Well I need to know the number of lodgers in the house and how much income you are generating? I already have an order to sell the house anyway!”
MC-“if – today fails we will be straight to the Supreme Court on appeal”
HJ-“Oh I doubt very much they will give you leave to appeal”
MC-“I said we’ll see”
The audacity of this man is unreal and the gut feeling of his confidence comes from his association with the establishment and his closeness to the visible corruption of his friends, that's ongoing. It is for sure a solicitors first and foremost consideration that he has the 1st duty to the court, as they come 1st, he the solicitor comes 2nd and the client or patient comes way down the list 3rd! The lies he states in court shows that the truth is no defence, the process is built around who tells the best story, no one cares about the truth! It's a system that makes your stomach turn. It also revolves around honour and dishonour staying in honour is the way forward even though what one might be saying is an absolute lie! The more one reads about the statute adminstrative system the more you see its all a game, a game of corruption! Where in reality the one who displays the most honour regardless of the lies is more likely to win his case. Its all completely different in a common law court where the truth there does play more relevance or at least thats my take on it. It is no wonder we are sliding into a revolution of civil unrest! I do believe if Mr Hugh Jones stated what he stated in court "under oath" I hold the evidence to show perjury. His whole arguement was based on my mother staying in Spain when he knows only too well her desire to live in her home in Blackpool but yet he presented a case based around the sale of the house and so conveniently omitted the fact of her desire to live in her bungalow to create a convenience for the court and the Judge to potentially sell it! His tactics are so low down, down in the dirt, he also could not give any answer to the clear violations of Mental Capacity Act 5 where the protection of a carer from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a patient as in our case where he is completely harassing the carer for sums in excess of probably £50,000 in his court costs to a fraudulent harassment charge in order to attempt to prevent the enforcement of a claim against his company associates under common law. For what they do, these people should hang! We are ordinary common folk whom are soveriegn flesh and blood souls that have trusted in the system to serve and protect, what a sham! It has not only robbed from my mother financially it has stolen part of her life, it has stolen a large portion of mine, it has destroyed family relationships to open wounds so wide they will never recover and yet there is no recourse, no proper complaint system in place to protect, NONE! VERY SAD.
JULY 8 2012 What ROGER HAYES is all about This seminar was conducted in our home town of Blackpool in March this year. We, my mother and I have sought common law jurisdiction for Justice because we sincerely believe statute law is destroying our rights.
JULY 8 2012 Habias Corpus Application for Roger Hayes FAILS
JULY 7 2012 Awaiting Honourable Judge Justice Jackson to deliver the finale, but mum having waited 11 years to sort out her affairs, I suppose a few days won't be so devastating.
July 6 2012 High Court Manchester 10.30
Mothers application to be released from the fraudster/thief and mal administration clutches of solicitors PANNONE LLP s HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES to get on with her remaining short life at the age of 72. This application started last year and the process is slowly driving my mother to the grave!
Today July 5 2012 Roger Hayes Of the British Constitution Group application for Habeas Corpus being submitted this morning at 10 am as below witnesses required to attend, I informed the BBC TV Nicola Dowling and Channel 4 TV Bronagh Walsh to check out this website for details.
Roger Hayes 4 July 2012
CALLING ON ANYONE IN THE MANCHESTER AREA
Roger Hayes was visited in prison this morning by Danny Bamping, who took an
affidavit from Roger in which he makes it clear he received no summons or
invitation to the hearing which resulted in the arrest warrant being issued.
Roger also makes it clear he was given no opportunity to speak at the
unlisted secret court hearing - a hearing which lasted just long enough to
the judge to utter the sentence.
Danny and his team will submit an application for Habeas Corpus tomorrow
morning, at the High Court in Manchester, which can be found in the new
"Civil Justice Centre".
The application will be heard under "Supreme Court Order 54".
The hearing is at 10am, Thursday 5th July 2012 and we would like to ask that as many people as
possible turn up to witness the application and support Danny and his team.
Roger (and we) would also like to express his/our appreciation for the
Fraud Act 2006
Fraud by who? Guess!
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if in breach of any of the sections listed in subsection
(2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).The sections are—
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation) HUGH JONES
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information) HUGH JONES
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position) HUGH JONES
(3) A person who is guilty of fraud is liable—
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).
Fraud by Abuse of Position - Aggravating or mitigating Factors
1. The amount involved.ie in this case £200,000
2. The use to which money was put (spending on luxuries more venal than on necessities).- Hiself
3. Breach of position trust, such as by employee, director or trustee. RECEIVER, IN WHICH DID IN ABUNDANCE
4. Elderly or vulnerable victim. YES my mother
5. Extent of loss - Intended and Actual. INTENDED
6. Extent of gain - Intended and Actual. INTENDED
7. The period over which, and the persistence with which, the fraud was carried out. 11 YEARS
8. Guilty plea. DOUBTFUL WITH HIS MANIPULATION FRIENDS IN THE JUDICIARY
9. Voluntary repayments. NONE
10. Personal factors such as illness, disability, family difficulties, etc.
July 4 2012 Accounts 2011-2012 Arrive and clearly demonstrate more fraud and theft from my mothers funds. Charges Amounting to over £13000 dividing into weekly charges of £260 to create all that misery and a charge of £984 for professional fees that my mother had to borrow from me to pay for another solicitor to engage with the receiver to gain 10 years accounts that he had refused to supply over the years. Considering the onus was on him and that the refusal to supply information is considered fraud why has he deducted this fee from my mothers funds when he was the person that created the fraud in the first place but yet he charged my mother for the expense!! It's easy to do this is it not when you hold all that control over someone else whilst his friendships with Judicial Dictators can with ease deny a patients access to justice in a removal of due processes of law that are my mothers inherent rights. The friendships Hugh Jones holds in high places facilitates such corruption with ease that my mother furiously does no longer want that man to continue to blight her life causing the suffering he continues to do in harassing her son etc with more fraud based charges in the ignorance to the Mental Capacity Act section 5 supposedly protecting her carer son of 16 years where the obvious objective is to incarcerate him via his judicial friendships and to deny him his inherent rights to trial by jury and then in which he can continue his fraud and thefts with impunity over my mother thrusting her into a care home whilst he sells her home as fast and as cheap as possible. Nice little plot of collusion and conspiracy but with underlieing deep flaws where it will not succeed. As my mother and I fear the worst that might come we have planned the what if scenario and in no way will she be kept and retained in a care home when there are waiting in the wings others whom have vowed to take care of her abroad if the inevitable collusion of fraud by Hugh Jones manages to succeed & where the removal of my liberty is concerned he will certainly not remove my mothers, or her property.
July 4 2012 A question of sovereinty Read the
article from free the planet.net on a question on sovereinty.
July 4 2012 Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman Read the
Letter from Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman.
July 3 2012 Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman
A long telephone call today from PHSO whom want more details of the complaint about the handling of matters or should I say the lack of, by the Office of Public Guardian. The PHSO have decided to make further investigative inquiries on the whole matter with specific focus on some of the more serious concerns that were today highlighted on the phone with follow up letters, signed by my mother.
Update on the Arrest of a HERO, Roger Hayes
We have just learned that Wirral Council, having issued proceedings against Roger Hayes for non payment of Council Tax, recently decided to enact their right for a Committal Hearing against Roger for his continued non-payment.
Article | July 3, 2012 - 1:35pm
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 a Committal Hearing took place at which Wirral Council state that Roger failed to appear.
As a result the Judge issued a bench warrant for his arrest, and Roger was arrested yesterday morning. The Council spokesman either did not know or refused to name the Judge.
Following his arrest Roger was brought before a Magistrate and sentenced to 21 days. The Council spokesman either did not know or refused to name the Magistrate, and was unable to say how much, if any, notice of either hearing was given to the General Public.
At this point we would like to make a correction to our initial press release, and that is:
Roger Hayes "WITHELD" his Council Tax rather than "refused to pay" as we reported. This has important implications in his legal case.
The most important fact in Roger's arrest, trial and imprisonment is that nobody knows the detail of what happened to him. What were the names and numbers of the police officers? What was the Court? What was the number of the case? Who was the Magistrate or Judge? Were any public present to see justice being done?
Roger was arrested at home and 9 hours later he was in prison, on the decision of one Magistrate. This must be yet another very dangerous example of the rise of the 'secret' courts and 'secret justice' - Kenneth Clarke MP is still pushing for yet more Courts without Juries.
Calls to the police and Liverpool prison where he is being held, have all been met with a wall of silence under the 'we can't say' and 'data protection'. We can see from this how yet more secrecy is introduced to keep the public interest at bay.
It is understood that the police have received many calls - one member of the public had the phone slammed down on him when he mentioned Roger's name.
Roger's family have also been refused direct information and access to him. They have now started the paperwork trail for formal permission to visit.
A former police officer has kindly made a number of pertinent points which we are happy to publish.
He was informed us that the prison would not confirm that Roger was with them for "security reasons". They referred him to the "Prisoner Location Service" on 0121 626 2773 - they would not accept verbal requests. Merseyside Police switchboard are also referring calls about Roger to the Council. This appears a highly dubious practice at law.
He states - "Because I wanted to make complaints I was put through to the police control room. The drill is for complaints to be recorded and then passed to an Inspector who will contact the complainant within 24 hours. My initial complaints are:
1. Was anyone informed of Rogers arrest? The contingency plan was for him to get a message to me. Note that the prisoner does not get to make a phone call himself. This is a precaution against prisoners passing coded messages to their associates outside.
2. Merseyside police, according to various sources on the Internet, are claiming that "Data Protection" forbids them to confirm Rogers whereabouts. This appears highly dubious practice because a "Regulation" cannot be held to repeal or infringe a Common Law right.
3. Passing complaints about police actions to the Council is a breach of the Police Discipline Regulations and of confidentiality for the individuals who are being complained about. I believe the Police Federation will not like this abuse of process."
The UK Column is delighted to report that the story of Roger Hayes has gone UK and world wide. Many are asking us what can they do? Our first answer is to spread the word, highlighting the the seriousness of the secrecy and lack of transparency in the whole process. As an example another member of the public has asked these excellent questions:
"Was there a signed warrant (wet signature) and who authorised it if so:
- Was there any forced entry to the house and/or damage.
- Did the warrant remain at the house.
- Did they search the house. Did they take anything away, i.e. computer, files, phones, router etc.
- Did they leave an inventory at the house Were there any witnesses to the arrest.
- Was any force used on Roger, or anyone else in the house.
- Was he handcuffed. Was there any explanation to anyone else in the house. Is there any idea of the charge. Were the arresting officers 'sworn police officers,
- PCSO's, from another 'agency' with powers of arrest or privates, or a mixture.
- Did anyone get their names or collar numbers.
- Did anyone get the name of the Prison Officer who called. If anyone could collate that, am sure his lawyers (or others) will want it, plus, it would provide good info for a follow up article"
Please ring the authorities yourself to hear their answers first hand. Every call is a point of support for Roger and shows the authorities the overwhelming public interest in the case. Please also write and ask for information and answers from Wirral Council and other authorities. As always be polite and measured in your calls and requests for information - unfortunately the authorities may not treat you with the same respect. As soon as we have more information we will post it. For those that want to write to Roger we will post his Prison Number as soon as we have it.
Merseyside Police Tel: 101 local or +44 (0)151 709 6010 in UK.
Liverpool Prison Tel: +44 (0)151 530 4000
Crimestoppers (UK only) Tel: 0800 555 111
If you would like to write to Roger with your support, you can write to him at:
HMP Liverpool, 68 Hornby Road Liverpool L9 3DF
His prisoner number is: A8953CP
Join us for a special UK Column Live broadcast tomorrow, Wednesday, 4th July at 12PM BST:
blog | July 2, 2012 - 10:38pm
At 0930 this morning, in scenes reminiscent of Stasi East Germany, 2 police cars and 4 policemen from Merseyside Police arrested British Constitution Group Chairman Roger Hayes at his Wirral home and drove away.
The first his family heard of him was at 18:30 this evening via a telephone call from a Warder in Liverpool prison, to say that Roger had been tried and sentenced to prison.
At no time were the family or any other members of the public informed of his arrest, and it is understood that he was tried in a secret court without a Jury.
Denied the right to argue his case, denied the right to a Jury, denied the right for the public to see justice being done, Roger was imprisoned in the secretive gulag system that Britain has become in 2012.
Roger's "crime" is that he has been refusing to pay his Council tax, because along with other state taxes, a proportion of the tax revenue gathered is being sent to the European Union, used to fund unlawful wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, and promote terrorism right around the world. To pay tax under these circumstances is, at the very least, unlawful under Section 15(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000.
As such the present government of UK in Westminster is complicit to terrorist action and war crimes and therefore the payment of taxes to an unlawful, criminal regime is itself a criminal act - one in which Roger refused to participate.
The state has never forgiven him for the arrest of Judge Peake at Birkenhead court as part of this campaign.
In addition to his stance on taxes for unlawful purposes, Roger has also been campaigning for the Lawful Bank - a monetary initiative in which money can be issued to the public as credit, rather than as crippling debt under the existing corrupt and fraudulent International Monetary System.
As Chairman of the British Constitution Group, Roger Hayes has been an outspoken public speaker warning the British public that their rights and freedoms under Common Law and the Constitution are being stripped away and replaced by a dictatorship of secret courts operating under Administrative and Statute Law.
There is no doubt that his success in alerting ever more people to the dangers of the British / EU dictatorship being built by a criminal element now masquerading as British politicians, has caused the state to imprison Roger. His challenge to the fraudulent banking system, as evidenced by the criminal acts of Barclays bank and todays resignation by arch Bilderberger and BBC advisor Marcus Agius, will also have made Roger enemies within Britain's wide criminal banking cabal.
Roger's family is shocked both at his arrest, and at the realisation that Britain is now sliding into a police state, where husbands, fathers and other good people can be lifted off the streets and imprisoned. There is now no doubt that Britain is further under the control of domestic terrorists in Westminster.
We ask that all those who value their freedoms and liberty call Meryside Police for further information and an explanation of their actions, and also call Liverpool prison to establish Roger's physical safety and well-being.
JULY 1st 2012 1130pm Manchester Airport Waiting for us at the Airport tonight was PANNONEs LLP henchmen - document servers - Global Servers where upon we where harassed by them to accept documents to the Legal Fiction Person/Entity/Corporation Mr Michael Clarke. The server was told that is not me and he said it is. I said no it's not, it's the legal fiction person and that is not me. He said I will throw them onto the ground here in Manchester Airport if you do not take them from me. I repeated that is not me and so the rest is up to you. He then threw the documents onto the floor where upon they where left, unserved!
I have previously written to PANNONE stating that all correspondence must be addressed to Mike of the family Clarke and that this was faxed upon them as a notice and that all correspondence not addressed properly will not be accepted.
Blacks law dictionary states that a person is an entity as in a corporation and as I stated in the beginning I am a flesh and blood man with a soul whom refuses consent to be governed by legislative statute rules and without such consent carrys no lawful force, NO CONTRACT - NO CASE. I do not consent, I never did,
I am not the legal fiction corporation and without my consent statute regulation carries no authority or has no claim over me. I have waived all the benefits and I claim
as I have continued to do common law jurisdiction in these matters where a jury court with equal piers is acceptable. This matter arose out of
Pannone s LLP corruptly using my mothers bank account to track my where abouts flouting data protection acts and article 8 of human rights, entitlement to a private life. The PANNONE LLP henchmen were also trying to serve to the legal fiction a STATUTORY DEMAND presumeably for a substantial amount of money!!! Money that a carer for 16 years of my mother does not have or ever likely to have.
The matter was recorded as it was expected and 2 witnesses watched the encounter.
JULY 1st 2012 Proposed Draft - Opening Position Statement for the court on the 6th July 2012.
JULY 1st 2012 Judge Jackson Article Read an article by Judge Jackson in particular page 5 paragraph 3 line 7 referring to where P (Ann) must have a voice & also next paragraph 4 line 4 referring to lengthy court cases and that time is of the essence and the person is entitled to some security and stability in the latter stages of the their life. To remain embroiled in lengthy court proceedings is undesireable. Line 11 refers to a jointly agreed expert! All this, flying in the face of current events hapenning to my mother. The most serious part of the article on the last page 8 paragraph 2 line 9 The subject (Ann) of the proceedings must lack capacity in order for the court to establish jurisdiction! Clearly not the case here and certainly not proved at all beyond all reasonable doubt.
JUNE 29 2012 DO NOT CONSENT. WAIVE ALL BENEFITS.
JUNE 29 2012 NO CONTRACT. NO CASE!
JUNE 29 2012 NO CONTRACT. RETURN TO SENDER.
JUNE 29 2012 YOUR CAR DE REGISTRATION
JUNE 27 2012 Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 In the year of the plague and the great fire of London parliament enacted a new act, behind closed doors, whilst people were still putting out the flames.. Ask yourself, Are you DEAD? Read about it here & THE ACT
JUNE 27 2012 DONATION ACCEPTED with the sincerest of thanks to you Jamie and your family every single donation no matter how small or large, whether its £1, £10, £100 or what ever it is, every penny helps us to continue our fight against this corrupt system thats ruining countless lives. THANK YOU again. Read our email to Jamie
JUNE 26 2012 STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Letter sent to Dr Waite that is not to be revealed until the court hearing of the 6th July 2012
JUNE 26 2012 Accounts requested Read about the accounts requested yet again?
JUNE 23 2012 James's Mum Taken at our villa in the hills of Malaga yesterday on a flying visit and reveals further harassment and intimidation from Pannones document servers whom had arrived at their home looking for us apparently and where upon they grilled James's father as to his where abouts in which his father stated he did not know as he had not spoken to his son for 3 years!
JUNE 23 2012 Dinner Party To celebrate the visit of James's mum in aid of his 21st this week, left to right, Mum, Lynda, Michele, James, Jonathon, David and me. Taken at 9pm at the restaurant in the hills of Malaga.
JUNE 21 2012 Email to Judge Jackson Hugh Jones & OPG Read an email of objection to the court and to the Judge
JUNE 20 2012 Party on the beach For James 21st Birthday, table for 10 please! Mum at head of the table at LA MORAGA beach restaurant in Torremolinous today celebrating with James and his new pet dog Benjy. Fabulous afternoon with Terri Fox and company Jonathon and Lynda etc.
JUNE 20 2012 Read the latest order by Judge Jackson.
JUNE 20 2012 Read the temporary report made by Dr Waite.
JUNE 20 2012 COURT TRANSCIPT Read a requested email copy of the court transcript from the judge's order of the 12th March 2012. We wish to check the transcript against our own copy. Read reply.
JUNE 19 2012 Email to Judge Jackson Sent today to Judge Jackson an email requesting clarification on what order he has drafted that was due on the 08.06.2012 and that can we be informed by email due to exile in case we need to appeal to the supreme courts.
JUNE 19 2012 Fishing Email Read an email exchange with HUGH JONES trying to get us to divulge information that my mother refuses consent to give within her rights of having GOD given capacity sanctioned by 4 doctors reports.
JUNE 19 2012 Read about governments, THAT are not GOD! We have rights! HUMAN ONEs!
JUNE 16 2012 Get to know your STRAWMAN (160 pages) MEET YOUR STRAWMAN & find out about your other half, and the deception behind the legal fiction of your birth certificate. Find out about how to control him and put him right back in his box! This is a must read for those wanting to take back their own sovereinty in a world fast becoming dictative slavery once again! Understand you! Stop taking the punishment you don't deserve! Don't need! Don't want & more importantly, do not have to have!
JUNE 16 2012 Class Action Ponderment Hello Mike
Good reply to the anonymous mail. I came back to the UK couple of days back.
Others have spoke of bringing a class action before. One of the problems seems to be that almost every one I have spoken with say that once the Cof P is raised as the problem no one seems to be able to get qualified lawyers to represent their case.
I have read that in the USA at least three lawyers who have tried standing-up against the probate courts there have then had their licence to practice revoked.
It was good to talk to you again. I have been pondering since then what possible course of action we have against these predatory criminals. Clearly the UK legal profession cannot be entrusted with our Courts of Law, they have become a waste of time to seek justice if the issues involve that C of P and its patrons..
If you like we can meet up again.
JUNE 16 2012 Local Outdoor Charity Event Taken at our local restaurant in the hills me mum n James enjoying a late evening meal with entertainment last night.
JUNE 15 2012 OPG BOARD email on Corruption Read a copy of email correspondence to Peter Hofshoer in exile with his mother in Austria whom is in correspondence with the Board of the OPG a Nicola Gowans and what she has had to say about corruption!!
JUNE 15 2012 Email from Hugh Jones Read the latest email/croc of shit from HUGH JONES containing lies, deceit, bribery, blackmail & various mentions of breaches of several acts, that HUGH JONES cares not about, backed by his corrupt judicial dictatorship better described as the British Mafia!
JUNE 15 2012 Email from Attorney General about Treason Read reply from Attorney Generals office stating they cannot investigate offenses of Treason and suggest reporting it to the Police!! I wonder what took so long for them to reply?? I wrote to them on the 9th May 2012 a total of 36 days to tell you they don't investigate!
Is it not strange how no one wants to investigate anything??
JUNE 15 2012 Letter from OPG Re Accounts Read Reply from Sonya of OPG investigations to state that last years accounts have not yet been released.
JUNE 14 2012 LINKS repaired Sorry for any inconvenience of any links in this site that did not work we have today repaired all links that were disrupted by the move from domain to domain and hosting services also as a result of PANNONE s LLP s attempted disruption to try and pervert the course of justice in this very matter which I might add has failed! Any links you may discover that are not functioning on this site please report it directly to my email address and I will endevour to fix it within an hour, email@example.com
JUNE 14 2012 eMAIL TO Honourable Judge Justice Peter Jackson Read the email to Judge Jackson
JUNE 13 2012 Anonymous comment left today on our new site I’ve been reading your website for the last year or so with interest. Sometimes you seem to make a decent point and then next you seem to go off on a crazy rant.
This ‘Michael of the family Clarke’ stuff is embarassing, making out the court orders aren’t for you as your name isn’t Mike Clarke, embarassing.
If the court saw in your favour and gave you your 9 million pounds (Another crazy thing the idea you will get 9 mill) how will you cash the cheque as it won’t be made out to ‘Mike of the Family Clarke’ ?
You cannot tell Pannones how you’ve survived the last 10 years or so as a carer, you just want to milk your poor mother’s money. Rent Mercedes (Why not a cheaper car?), try to start up a business in Spain, just milking your poor mothers money. I just hope you dont get your hands on her house as that seems to be your main aim. Disgusting.
The whole world is not against you, it’s you. You seem to be losing your mind. If the court ruled in your favour and fined Pannones 25k (Rather than the other way round) you wouldn’t think the courts were corrupt would you ?
You’re like a little child who moans when he doesn’t get his own way.
Must admit your website is fascinating yet frustrating seeing the way you simply wont give up. Mentioning that Norwegian killer previously as well was another sick thing to do.
AND MY REPLY
Thanks for your comment.
I think if you experienced the problems I do then on occasion you might also go off on a crazy rant. Under the circumstances I think that’s justified.
With regard to Mike of the family Clarke STUFF as you say is simple really if you look into it all properly. In short its a revocation of your own legal fiction self, a discontinuation of the legal fiction contract that we all hold with the UK government unbeknown to us. It s about CONSENT and how we are all coerced into consent to be governed by any statute legislative rule. Under common laws and proper courts with Juries we were all protected easier and safely now all thats been eradicated to turn the system into a judicial dictatorship something which you personally may agree to but I certainly dont consent to.
That is me the grown up speaking not the child. You by consent to all that is a child and therefore needs that system to tell you what to do when where and how, in essence dictated to. Everything I have done for and with my mother is with her consent where all others do not have her consent and I might add she has capacity meaning that anyone delving into her affairs is committing fraud and theft.
The Mercedes car you talk of was not on rent, it was owned by my mother and prior to her accident and award drove just the same, Mercedes and or Jaguar, and I think this childish point you make matters not!
With regard to her house I have not been trying to get my hands on it. She has been trying to gift it. What goes around will come around and those that try to take away an older persons rights and choices are wholly wrong and are doing this to meet their own ends. In your case I would love to be a fly on the wall when you get to 72 and your own situation might play into the same hands, how will you feel when you cannot do with your own property what you wish to.
You obviously are a selfish thoughtless person whom I consider is related or attached to the pannone side of things to give such a view here thats clearly one sided not giving one ounce of consideration for my mothers wishes. You are a PREDATORY GUARDIAN in the making but I would suggest the role is a declining one in which will in due course have its commupence.
My mind is fully intact and thats why I have acted accordingly to protect my mothers basic human rights to choose. Incidentally your little rant appears very similar to a rant by email last year by a Peter Jones whom of which I published on the site and its a shame that your annonymity displays your cowardice on this matter and I suspect you have a hidden agenda to say the least.
Last but not least the Norwegian killer Anders Breviek that was mentioned is a clear example how the Judicail corrupt dictatorship that we are now living under is the type of matter that creates such depravity of evil, simply because justice is not being done anymore. We are not on our own here. I am not alone there are hundreds of thousands suffering the same fate of, financial rape of the elderly. Is it your dad Peter, thats doing it. Are you HUGH JONES s son Peter?? I wonder!! By the way when I get the cheque for £9million can you see any bank refusing to open me an account in the name of Mike of the family Clarke, because I cant!!
Mike of the family Clarke Read the previous letter we believe is linked to the same person!!
JUNE 13 2012 Network Solutions Read an email back from Network Solutions stating their re-instatement of our principle website, albeit delayed & censored.http://www.opg.me. This our main website has been down for two weeks and was attracting approximately 700 hits per week of traffic. We will over a period discover what damage it has done to our cause.
JUNE 13 2012 Statement Pannone LLPs who work in the guardianship area recently said, You’ve gone over the line. I assume they were referring to my website and my obvious rage at the theft from my mother and the judicial assault on justice. In response, I would say the following: There is no line! The attorney guardians have obliterated the line between stealing and earning, the line between caring for and exploiting the elderly, the line between what my mother earned pound by pound and what the attorney guardian didn't earn, the line between right and wrong, as well as the line between greed and need. In addition to contributing to the above, the Court of Protection has mindlessly eradicated the line between law and lawlessness, the line between justice and injustice, the line between bias and impartiality, the line between expediency and diligence, and the line between what soldiers and taxpayers sacrifice for and what they get. The attorney guardians are bottom dwellers who owe their existence to Denzil Lush. Denzil Lush owes his existence to attorneys - the attorneys and judges (also attorneys) who compose the CoP on judicial conduct as well as to the attorneys who pass through his courtroom in utter silence, accepting the farce he offers as justice, even when they know it's wrong, and tolerating the "juristocracy" he has created to pad his ego - rationalizing and offering specious justifications so as to relieve themselves of the responsibility to act - to change - to refuse to accept. I haven't crossed the line. The line was destroyed by greed, by judicial perversion, and by spinelessness, long before I discovered the absence of demarcation. Most professions are founded on ideals. Over time those ideals change, expand, and even contract. That is as it should be. Unfortunately most professions also have a few who dirty those ideals: the architect who uses substandard materials putting at risk all who use the building, the educators who deliberately fail to note the signs of child abuse, and the attorneys who are silent with regard to judicial corruption and courtrooms that reek of depravity. There are many levels of "professionalism." Surely among the highest, the most profoundly "professional" are those who will do whatever it takes to rid the ranks of that which corrupts it. There is rumblings today of bringing about a class action with all affected!
JUNE 13 2012 ACCOUNTS REQUESTED by MUM A YEAR AGO Read a reminder from a year ago of mum requesting the full unhindered accounts that still have not been provided!
JUNE 13 2012 Email to Network Solutions threatening lawful redress.
JUNE 12 2012 The Launch of the New Domain of www.courtofprotection.me.uk has gone live today. There will be other's as the week's progress, never again to be caught out by corrupt processes to hand where NETWORK SOLUTIONs have censored the original site www.opg.me at this moment in an unlawful move yet to be resolved.
JUNE 12 2012 MONTHLY FUNDS MISSING FOR 9 MONTHS Email to HUGH JONES about monthly funds he has been with holding for the past 9 months and not re instated a total of £3600.
JUNE 12 2012 CORRUPTION ENQUIRY REQUESTED Read A request by not just us, but other's exiled too, from the corrupt Office of Public Guradian, requesting a corruption enquiry!!
JUNE 12 2012 LIENS RECOGNISED BY PANNONES Read about PANNONE s partner Richard Drinkwater, whom is one of our endebted partners within our own Commercial Lien/Claim to Read, against themselves at PANNONE s and his recognition of holders of liens where creditors such as us, "are authentic", where PANNONE s have openly claimed no recognition of "our commercial lien" against them or the Commercial Affidavit Process claiming its of no value. Can one clearly see the contradictions that are riddled in the company Pannone s, that is so called award winning, are the awards for contradiction. see the picture! Isn't it funny the minute a commercial lien is served upon them that they do not recognise it, so why did they fraudulently use harassement laws to try to curtail it! Probably spending, according to them in excess of £50,000. Was this action in effect recognition, of a perfected commercial lien? Seeing as this is turning out to be a trial by internet we will let you the public be the judge of this!
JUNE 11 2012 HUMAN TRAFFICKING Read about Human trafficking: It ain’t just for sex anymore & Read about the only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good people to do nothing! ANOTHER VICTIM!! http://www.guardianshipscam.com/ Definately one to read, it will make your eyes water!!
JUNE 11 2012 Read about predatory-guardians-how-courts-are-allowing-professional-guardians-to-rob-your-assets.
JUNE 11 2012 www.opposepredatoryguardians.com Goes live today and by Thursday the release of the new look site will be upon it. The new site is going to be more user friendly for the public. It will allow feedback and blog facilities with the allowance of short comments from public views. It should be interesting!
JUNE 10 2012 Read email again to Network Solutions. 3 days have passed and no reply? Our main site suspended for 10 days for no reason (www.opg.me).
JUNE 10 2012 The Helplessness of Judges
The commercial lien, which is authorized both by the common law and by Title 15 of the United States Code (USC), is reportedly the same lien the IRS uses to take Americans’ homes and cars. However, some pro se litigants do not depend upon Title 15, but upon the common law of negotiable instruments (a.k.a. Commercial Law).
As such, it’s almost impossible to remove a commercial lien without the approval of the individual claimant who filed the lien. Although a commercial lien can be challenged by a common law court or by a 7th Amendment jury trial, it does not require a court process or a court judgment for its establishment, validity, or execution. Therefore, it appears that the courts may not be able to simply extinguish this lien on their own discretion (or on motion from the lien debtors) without the voluntary approval of the person who filed the lien.
Traditionally, these liens can only be removed by the voluntary decision of the person who filed the lien, by the decision of a constitutional common-law jury trial, or by waiting 99 or 100 years. Since the common law has been smothered in the UK & U.S.A., all judges are essentially powerless to overcome the liens. A Powerful Weapon
The Commercial Affidavit Process — or "CAP" — is perhaps one of the most powerful devices available to the common man for righting wrongs and accomplishing justice. The process is not new, as some may believe. At its foundation are the laws of commerce which spring from the eternal, immutable Laws of God, and those laws have been in force since the beginning of human existence. Provoke the use of the Commercial Affidavit Process against you and you provoke the wrath of all that is just and right.
Today, those who are availing themselves of the CAP system are equipping themselves with a very powerful equalizer. Make no mistake! The CAP is a very lethal weapon in the war against injustice. It is capable of righting wrongs while eliminating the "cost factor" that deprives thousands of people from getting justice. The expression "equal under the law" again has real meaning, thanks to CAP. When the CAP methodology is properly loaded and sighted on a wrongdoer, success is "as good as in the bag." The Process is powerful and dangerous to those who are in the line of fire. There is no escape: either acquiesce and justly recompense or suffer the awful consequences. And, those consequences can be calamitous as will be shown. Did DAVID bring down GOLIATH - Thense so shall Ann of the Clarke family bringeth down PANNONE LLP alongside HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES.
JUNE 9 2012 Email from MP Gordon Marsden confirmimg he last week did dispatch the signed forms by him, to go to the parliamentary ombudsman. We await the outcome. We claim that the Office of Public Guardian is not fit for purpose.
JUNE 8 2012 Email to Channel 4 Television about the making of a TV program soon!
JUNE 8 2012 Hell hath no fury like a woman SCORNED!!
Advert to be placed. Mother is now determined that this advert be placed in various media seeing as she is not being given her rights in the UK and that her so called guardian HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES is persecuting her to gain possesion of her home in order to incarcerate mum into a CARE home. Dispatched to London Gazette and Manchester Evening News to start with!
JUNE 8 2012 1 year ago JULY 18 2011 Read the transcript of the recording. Can I draw your attention to section 1, 21 & 23 where HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES clearlys states that 1> He does not mind being recorded 21>He clearly states post it all on the website & 23> again he says, "post what you like on the website" Now correct me if I am wrong but, is that or is that not a clear and concise authority from PANNONEs LLP HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES to record and post what ever I like!
JUNE 8 2012 FACEBOOK ENTRY
JUNE 7 2012 Email finally from Network Solutions and our reply.
JUNE 7 2012 Read further email to NETWORK SOLUTIONS referring to another Judges order that specifically states under paragraph 13 that reference must be made to the website of www.opg.me under section 13 of the order that cannot now be carried out until re-instatement of the site!
JUNE 6 2012 Email to network solutions again requesting a response!
JUNE 5 2012 Read further information sent to NETWORK SOLUTIONS
JUNE 5 2012 BLOG / Feedback Forum Being added so as to HAVE YOUR SAY!
JUNE 5 2012 PANNONE to NETWORK SOLUTIONS Take note in the letter the enquiry by Network Solutions as to why the Judges order is not signed!! Read letter to ISP from HUGH JONES & PANNONE. Read Schedule from the court. Read the "so called" order from the court.
JUNE 5 2012 Transfer of domains blocked!! Read how an attempt to transfer all domains out of Network Solutions is currently being blocked.
JUNE 4 2012 WEBSITE SUSPENSION & CENSORSHIP Whilst negotiations continue with Network solutions over the unlawful suspension of our website which we are beginning to consider as theft of paid for services, we continue with this our back up service ending in .UK HUGH JONES of PANNONE s again conspires to cover up his misgivings by coercing Network Solutions into believing they have a lawful and enforceable court order & to force closure of the website.
JUNE 1 2012 Read our letters to NETWORK SOLUTIONS in connection with the suspension of our website OPG.ME tonight at 9pm. Fortunately this our sister site OPG.ME.UK is a back up & our hosting platform now changed!
JUNE 1 2012 Taken this afternoon
Our 1st of June lunch photograph taken today at El Bichito Restaurante El Grande Spain with friends Cheryl and John. Mum showing her enjoyment at being a FREE "SOVEREIGN" human being, to do as she pleases without being in the chains of the (UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION) of Judicial Dictatorship & corruption. There might be corruption in Spain but at least its more visible than in the UK and we will say something for Spain they do look after their families!!
JUNE 1 2012 SRA Response from the SRA Solicitors Regulatory Authority conduct of investigation into HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES & PANNONE LLP.
May 31 2012 When in doubt, CHILL OUT! Whilst we comtemplate the situation we find ourselves in we must retain the sense of fun and freedom, that is what life is all about... a freedom we believe my mother is entitled to... a basic reminder to our cause and what this is all about! An individuals choices are to be respected and especially where her capacity remains INTACT! This picture taken this afternoon at our residence in Malaga in which we repeatedly told various persons where we where, to which are none believers, relying on sources of data in connection with my mothers private banking facilities, that are being spied upon in breach of article 8 of Human Rights Act the entitlement to a private family life & not to mention the Data Protection Act also broken where PANNONE s HUGH JONES are openly supplying this information to third party DOCUMENT SERVERS & also a DR Waite in which it has nothing to do with them. What rights have they to do this?? The obstruction of the court order by PANNONES to an independant psychologist found by others in Liverpool is openly proved on this website with evidence via recorded conversations. The situation remains in a diabolical state of affairs when in reality the truth is that these vultures need to incarcerate my mother in a care home in order to facilitate the sale of her property something she has repeatedly told them she does not want and yet they continue to put her and us through this whilst officialdom turns its back cowardly to the Mafia style Judicial Corrupt Dictatorship that goes about its business without any redress or protection in place to stop it!
May 31 2012 Read a response from the Office of Judicial Complaints and why they cannot investigate my complaints and that I must lodge appeals.
May 30 11:30pm 2012 Telephone call From mother asking where I was. Be back soon I said. Those whom subscribe to the thoughts that mother does not have the capacity are so sadly mistaken. Before 3 independant witnesses to my phone ringing when mother was on her own that her capacity is as intact as its ever been at the age of nearly 72 she can pick up the phone and ring you to ask when will you be back? Its absurd what the courts and others are doing to her remaining life, restraining and stopping and preventing her from her wishes, in breach of all written Mental Capacity Act Rules with impunity! These people need hanging in my book!
May 30 2012 Read about UK LANDMARK CASE!! The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited. No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority. That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.
May 30 2012 It is time to claim Personal Sovereignty in the Courts and not Judge driven courts of no Constitutional Judicial Due Process, the courts are aggressively "moving forward" to complete the stripping away of Due Process, saying that it costs the state too much to defend indigent defendants or to allow jury trials. Arbitrate and Mediate most cases off the record and out of a courtroom. The attorneys say this "relieves the burden on the court" and "saves money". When asked Chief Justice ???? some years ago in a Hearing why there are no jury trials in FAMILY Court. He said he "did not really know, except that it would probably cost too much". So much for Due Process, so much for Constitutionally protected Inherent Rights or protection of Families. Keeping cases "out of constitutional courts" has filled the prisons with non violent "offenders", criminalized and incarcerated often without ever being charged with a Crime. Many prisoners have never had a trial, and with no oversight a DA stacks charges and coerces a "lesser plea", often after accusing some heinous crime for which there is no evidence, or unlawfully seized FAMILY or property are held hostage to compel guilty pleas. With mandatory sentencing, one event becomes "five felonies" and the person, often FAMILY, are sentenced to long prison sentences, often their only crime is that they are poor and vulnerable and trapped in the corrupted exploitive system, unable to extricate themselves. It is a carefully crafted attorney game, and the People must become aware that at this time no one can be sure FAMILY removed or prisoner incarcerated was allowed Due Process in court. This corrupt conspiracy has turned our nation into one of the most imprisoned population on earth. It's now a game punishment for profit.
The only way to get the Truth past the attorneys and judges is to plead your case yourself, in your Lawful Sovereign capacity. You will learn that the Judges lie all the time and intentionally deceive you about your rights, so you must learn what those rights are and demand them, and only before the court Sui Juris will you be able to do this. An attorney's main job is to prevent confrontation on the record revealing any systemic corruption, to never "irritate the court", to bow and stand and make sure you do likewise, kissing up to the corrupt, tyrant judge ... the greedy attorney makes his living from your chaos, misery and fear and the bar wrote the rules they are using to exploit you .... the bar member attorney will block you from making the record of such facts as a Judge's lie. In order to confront this on the Record, you must plead your case yourself. You begin to see that this essential right of pleading your own case and accessing the Public Record and juries to decide the facts and the law is vital and the core of restoring and maintaining our freedom. To force a Natural Person to give up their rights in any court is TREASON, and these judges are to be held accountable BY THE PEOPLE. They are already stripping our FAMILY from us, criminalizing every act possible and now they are telling us when this happens we have no right to appeal what is done to us. Forced to be raped by a Whore for the Court and to swallow this without resistance. Parliament must act immediately to reverse these trends, and turn around this National Socialist Agenda that has overtaken our country, destroying our Constitution, and subverting our inalienable rights. The whole purpose of the Process we are sharing is to allow others to realize, as we did, that you CAN fight back, you CAN plead your own case and stop the agenda that has usurped the British Constitution at this time.
Germany under Hitler was a Corporate Socialist State. Adolf said the State is the Parent of the Child. Any judge that acts as a judge in Family Court is presiding in an unconstitutional court and is therefore committing the crime of Trespass of Treason against your Civil Rights and against the Constitution - THE LAW OF THE LAND! Read
May 29 2012 Channel 4 Television Further contact today with Channel 4 Television confirming their intention to go ahead with the making of a program with regard to OPG/CoP so called "patients" with capacity. Anyone interested should contact Bronagh Walsh on 07795620236.
May 29 2012 Form sent to parliamentary ombudsman with letter from OPG & MP Gordon Marsden.
May 29 2012 Response dated 14th May 2012 from Office of Judicial Complaints taking up the complaint, ref 13071/13072/13073 of 2012.
May 28 11.30am 2012 Phone call from Dr Waite the SPECIAL VISITOR from the court of protection claiming to be stood outside our Blackpool address wanting to see my mother in a fashion of harassment and intimidation. He stated that there is a window open and he implied we should open up the house in order for him to comply with Judge Jackson's court order. I told him there were lodgers in the property probably at work! I stated to him that I was in Malaga as can be seen by yesterdays photograph taken at our friends £2 million pound villa in Estapona and that he was specifically told to fly to Malaga where upon he would be collected from the airport to conduct his assessment. He then stated that I did not specifically state I was in Malaga so I said well, how would I be able to collect him from the airport if I was not in Malaga, was he implying I was a liar! He then said explain why is it your mothers visa card is being used in the UK, to which I stated that's none of your business. Under article 8 of the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT my mother is entitled to a private life clearly your co conspirators are in breach of article 8 to be spying on her. He said I was not complying with Jackson's court order I said the only person not complying with the unlawful order was HUGH JONES as they were the one's refusing the independent Doctor found by Psychology Direct, in Liverpool. Please can you explain I asked, for the terminology of "SPECIAL VISITOR" to be defined, as we see no difference in his expertise to the one found independently by Psychology Direct. He said he was trained expertly which would imply that other experts are not qualified, which we dispute. With channel 4 TV exposing "the scandal" of SPECIAL VISITORS, whom do you the public think we should trust?? The tone and content of Dr Waite's call was very demeaning and I would describe it also, as threatening, where he also tried talking over me as though he was talking to a child. He was of course given short shrift as I stopped him dead, saying "you think you are clever", as a sovereign flesh and blood man I asked "what are your qualifications on law?" "Particularly HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS!" Dr Waite ended the call!! Stating this is going no-where! Perhaps he should have considered that before arriving without appointment to an address he had previously been told we were not at - obviously he at that point decided I was a LIAR! Now, the questions that this begs, is, WHO PAID FOR HIS VISIT? I have a sneaking suspicion it will be my mother, under more fraudulent acts of theft! Read this link to the emails with Dr Waite and ask yourself did I clearly state we were living in EXILE as we feel safer from the potential removal of our CIVIL LIBERTIES and that should he fly to MALAGA we will collect him to conduct his assessment! The trouble with these people they are in breach of several HUMAN RIGHTS ACTs and clearly they do not care. They claim under the protection of Mrs Clarke they act but Mrs Clarke has capacity and choose's to be a free "SOVEREIGN" human being & make her own mind up!! Mrs Clarke would love to be able to gift her house to her son where upon he has stated his commitment for her to live in that house till the day she dies but that the Courts, HUGH JONES & Pannone s plus JUDGES are moving toward removing yet again her rights, then to sell her property and against her will place her into a care home in which she adamantly does not want to go!!
WHO IS PROTECTING WHO HERE!
Clearly clutching at straws, and in this case it is straws, it is the strawman and or straw woman, where reference to a person is concerned. A person we, my mother and I are not! We are flesh and blood SOVEREIGNS We have by statement/affidavit denounced all connection to the strawman/person/legal fiction contract of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION purely down to its firm commitment to injustice breach of HUMAN RIGHTS, breach of common laws of the land and it's shear unadulterated contribution to the construction of a JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP now clearly at hand & in CAHOOTS with the executive, conspiring to deny us, the lay people our common law rights under Magna Carta and the Bill Of Rights. They are in effect, enslaving us all, wilfully, by coercing our consent in matters where they can then act, as trustees. WAKE UP ALL!
May 25 2012 Read about our Tribe of the Phoenix - A New Human Era!
May 24 2012 Read about the Criminal Global Elite's influence and Lawful Rebellion.
May 24 2012 Read about the relationship between the Executive the Judiciary and the Government.
May 24 2012 Read how the PANNONE LLP s henchmen go about their dirty business of intimidating innocent people yesterday at 5pm. Apparently trying to serve the, as yet, un served court order! THIS IS THE UNLAWFUL, UNCONSENTED TO HEARING IN WHICH IS OF A NULL AND VOID VALUELESS DOCUMENT! Addressed to the legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE and not Mike of the family Clarke! In threatening behaviour they intimidate BY HARASSMENT others for their own gain! The COURT was served paperwork to refuse consent to the hearing of 15 pages here but the judicial corruption juggernaut continue's using it's co conspirator HUGH JONES & Pannone LLP s as its vehicle to plough its way forward using FRAUD, HARASSMENT & INTIMIDATION to get what it wants! (the legal fiction) MICHAEL CLARKE!!! Currently a piece of paper!! A birth certificate!! A contract with another legal fiction!! (UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION).
NOT of course me! The sovereign flesh and blood human being that responds to only common laws of the land with jury's attached to them as is my sovereign right, which has been expressed and expressed in the face of full denial of due process by persons purporting to be JUDGE's that in fact are only so under consent of the governed!
May 23 2012 Email from Hugh Jones refusing fees request from my mother's own money so my mother can investigate a miscarriage of justice 11 years ago. Is their a conflict of interest again? Is the Executive protecting the Judiciary and likewise the Judiciary protecting the Executive? Yes we believe so and therefore an independent body of people are required!! OBVIOUSLY. Its commonly known as a conflict of interest and they are well aware of it. So if they are well aware of it then they are only too well aware why the use of the word CORRUPTION is correct and fair. Something which a jury would resolve, so remind me again, why are we not getting a jury?
May 23 2012 Legal Ombudsman Have decided to investigate and given mother Case No: 201205737
May 23 2012 Read a letter back today from OPG investigations.
May 23 2012 Statute knowledge is
something to get to know about with your 'consent' upon your 'legal fiction' Read & watch. Get to know about Lawful Rebellion and article 61 Read. Educate yourself a little on the Treason Act 1351 Read. If we want real justice back in our country we are going to have to fight for it in Lawful Rebellion. NOTE the:-
Bill of Rights 1689 -
Bills of Exchange Act 1882 -
Treason Act 1351 -
Charter of Liberties 1100 -
Magna Carta 1215/1297 -
Declaration of Rights 1688/9 - These, all still in force today are in actual fact there to protect you and to uphold the principles of 'common law', use them or lose them! Condemnation with out investigation is the height of ignorance
Albert Einstein. We have trusted public officials, judiciary, media and corporations, allowing them to manipulate every aspect of our society with complete unaccountability. Lay people turn to greedy bar member attorneys when they are afraid, only to be compromised into losing everything they have in the corrupted courtroom process. Usually their own attorneys and the rest of the courtroom players are all working against them for their own profit. The People do not realize this until they have been impoverished and destroyed. Get Sui Juris!!!& take charge of "your own jurisdiction". We must restore accountability and a standard of Law and Constitutional contract/oath with real penalties of prosecution for violations of the Public Trust by our government.
Read the book
May 23 2012 Signed By MP New Parliamentary Ombudsman forms sent off for further investigation but this is not for the first time, we pleaded for intervention in August 2011 and then again in November 2011 Read here, but today's will have MP Gordon Marsdens approval signed along with it, backed by the OPG s letter of point blank refusal to investigate Read & Read. Sent 29.05.2012
May 22 2012 Further Complaints drafted and sent to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority and the Law Society & Legal Ombudsman.
May 21 2012 Read further email exchange with Dr Waite the courts SPECIAL VISITOR.
May 21 2012 POSITION STATEMENT of CONCLUSION Recap & reflect on 11 years. Faxed today a formal reply to PANNONE s, the JUDGE's, and the courts, with reference to the so called court order! Both items faxed to 10 Downing St, Domonic Grieve (Attorney General & OJC Office of Judicial complaints & further, to the Lord Chancellor Kenneth Clarke.
May 20 2012 Hi Mike
Yep, I would be interested.
The problem is would Channel 4 really have the bottle to go up against this organised crime network operating actually within the legal profession with some of their own sitting at high levels of the judiciary facilitating property fraud, extortion and racketeering. These people with their steady stream of victims as we all approach old age make the Mafia look like small-fry amateurs in organised crime. Regards G
May 19 2012 Dear Mike
1 yes you can publish my letter if you tell me in which publication etc and
2 as I live in Austria participating in Channel 4 TV might be difficult depending upon times, dates etc.
However I am interested to see justice done against CoP and it's non- armed wing OPG who I also blame in this fiasco together with so-called "Court Special Visitor"
May 19 2012 Reply to S Dear S
Thank you so much for writing to tell us about your plight and we are speaking to producers in Channel 4 television whom are interested in making a TV program would you be interested in participating!
Do you mind me also publishing your letter.
regards Mike & Ann
May 19 2012 Dear Mike & Ann Clarke
I found some of your correspondence written to a Dr Waite on the internet concerning capacity issues of your mother.
I am writing (hope you don't mind) as it would seem I have been through the same agonies as you concerning my own 85 yrs old mum and the" court of protection" and so called "Court Special visitor" who was so old and incompetent and on research - I even found out he misrepresented places where he was supposed to have worked and now does not even have a GMC licence. On this incompetence he wrote a negative report to CoP resulting in me loosing (it was revoked) my EPA which my mum signed and granted to me in 2006. I was made the proverbial scape goat, and medical records were disclosed without consent.
Presiding judge stated, I was unreasonable, secretive, and controlling when like you I was only trying to protect mum from judicial dictatorship and a take over of mum's finances by an "in-law" who was main instigator in the objection campaign in breach of mca Schedule 4.
Said "in-law" has now been appointed deputy against mum's past and present wishes.
My mum now lives a life of lonliness and misery as the so called "deputy" has no interest in my mum personally nor in her well being or welfare.
I hope you come right in your campaign and get want you want for your mum. I agree with you the system is DIABOLICAL and extremely unfair - Human Rights notwithstanding.
May 19 2012 Reply to G & Thank you G.
Channel 4 are interested in doing a TV program R U interested?
May 19 2012 Hello Mike
Good to see your site is back on-line. I had wanted to read again Alen Eccles letter to you. Considering such an irretrievable breakdown of Hugh Jones relationship with you and Anne, the question needs to be asked why he will do nothing as Public Guardian to make amends by having Jones removed.
The answer seems to be in his reference to his inability to go against the judicial decisions of the nominated Court of Protection Thugs. Its interesting to again see how the Court of Protection agents assert themselves by loutish bully-boy harassment against their victims. They are contemptuously using the mainstream court system for their corrupt own ends to get you silenced. In the Sharp judgement they have obtained a criminal order for extortion against you, within their so called costs, much of which would go into their owns pockets.
Your right when you say it does not look good though. Especially once you realise it appears to be up against a highly organised national crime network determined to silence any dissenters from their claimed un-fettered power of their own discretion operating under the seal of the last of the corrupt high offices the crown.
Keep in touch..G
May 16 2012 Read the latest email exchanges with the Court of Proection Special Visitor Doctor!
May 15 2012 Host Suspension Problem This site was taken down for a number of days without warning & without proper clarified information as to why and is still under investigation. We apologise to those people inconvenienced.
May 15 2012 Danny Linguard I have just been speaking to a producer from c4 who is very interested in our story about the court of protection. She has said that she would like to speak to everybody affected by the court of protection. (only if you have not already spoken to the media) If your interested her number is 07795620236 and her name is Bronagh Walsh.
May 15 2012 Read a formal reply to PANNONE s, the JUDGE's, and the courts, with reference to the so called court order!
May 14 2012 Read a notice sent to our hosting provider Network Solutions.
May 14 2012 Read a potential claim against Network Solutions for the unwarranted suspension of hosting services without full and proper notice or explanation of why?
May 14 2012 Read a letter today sent to our hosting provider Network Solutions whom suddenly decided to withdraw service because of what they described as an AUP Acceptable use policy violation. Understandably because I have no idea to what they are referring this letter was sent. We are possibly of the belief that outside forces or intervention is at work here.
May 14 2012 Read a letter from MP Gordon Marsden confirming further intervention.
May 14 2012 Read the reply to OPG investigations refusal to investigate!
May 14 2012 Read a reply of refusal to investigate from OPG investigations to say that the non response of a HUGH JONES deputy request for mother to use £600 for a report on the first doctors report Dr Khan where a miscarriage of Justice has obviously taken place. Now would you call this protection. Is it because it's them that's being investigated? Of course it is! So, what does that stink of? Corruption!
May 13 2012 Read a copy of the PANNONE letter of final unconsented to & therefore unlawful court order May 2 2012.
May 13 2012 Read a copy of the UNLAWFUL Judgement from May 2 2012.
May 13 2012
Fear is cured by defensive action based on knowledge.
When the Government fear the people there is Liberty.
When the people fear the Government there is Tyranny.
It is better to die on your feet as a free man, then to live on your knees as a slave.
May 11 2012 Phonecall from John Jones of MP Gordon Marsdens office at 15.20pm to confirm that Mr Marsden is writing an additional letter to CEOPG Alan Eccles and also that upon receipt of our completed Parliamentary Health Service OMBUDSMEN form Gordon Marsden MP will sign it and send it for further investigative powers to be implimented.
May 10 2012 REQUEST No3 sent out by fax to HMRC Specialist listings TONY STANDEN.
May 9 2012 Read complaints faxed in to the OFFICE for Judicial Complaints.
May 9 2012 Read the complaint sent to the Attorney General's Office.
May 9 2012 DEVOTED Mother & son that even a government and its corrupt, judicial dictatership will not seperate come what may!! Take your corruption and shove it. Your getting what you want, my mother's house, now you leave us alone! She has capacity, you have proof! What more do you want? She has said no, no & more no! But PANNONE s judicial corrupt juggernaut just keeps on coming! Take the bungalow share it with the relatives and leave my mother to make her own choices!! Its easy!! My mother said tonight, faced with the options of going into care with her own daughter and younger sons preferences its a no contest decision and never has been she does not feel safe anymore being in the UK where her freedom of choice is being corruptly denied by the relatives and PANNONE s HUGH JONES & his judcial corrupt "juggernaut" that we cannot defend against under the new wave of STATUTE Tsunami's engulfing common people and their BILL of RIGHTS 1689 with the MAGNA CARTA ACT 1215 that clearly in their eyes seem to have no relevance!!
May 8 2012 Dinner for 6
A celebration of Lynda's birthday, a little swoiree of close connected friends and supporters of mum and her plight, Jonathon & David, get together for dinner to wish Lynda a happy 64th.
May 8 2012 Read an email sent to MP GORDON MARSDEN.
May 5 2012 Response letter from new chief of OPG Alan Eccles denying any responsibility to the issue's in response to our letter of 24th April 2012 here to Read. This is obviously the start of the new brush that don't sweep clean at all. He is going to continue as before in the exact same manner as Martin John, deny what's happening, sweep it under the carpet and let's hope it will go away! Well we got news for you ALAN - it won't!!
May 4 2012 YET ANOTHER CONCERNED WEB WATCHER
Just been reading your latest on your site..
Right to trial be our peers
The other day I read that funds held in court,, paid interest at 6% between the years 2001 to 2009 so even after your Mum purchased the house there should have been a substantial income coming in each year.. Where is it accounted for?
Have you noticed in the recordings the way in which Jones hides behind the court? I suggest you ask your Mum write [recorded delivery] directly to the Superior clerk, now a so called Senior Judge,, Master Denzil Lush and demand that he account, with detailed annual accounts as to income and expenditure to account for all the years and show where all your Mums money has gone.
Point out to him his ultimate public liability for his agent who his authority appointed as your Mums receiver. His authority has the ultimate liability as a public authority for its contractors.. [ for example if you were to fall into a hole in pavement,, you don't look to sue the contractor,, you sue the council which is liable for the pavements upkeep.]
Further to his ultimate liability of public authority as the appointing authority perhaps you would like to point out to Lush his fiduciary position and quote to Lush:-
"The burden of proof lies on the person of fiduciary position to show he is not taking advantage to cover deception against the estate."
You need to back up you Mums demand for them to "account" with your own letter and some how persuade your brother and sister to do the same also, Why not?? Would they not want to also see total clarity of Jones accounting for their own Mums money,, so sad they not even send her at least a card on Mothers Day,, shocking behaviour towards their own mother!!
Considering, according to Jones your Mums money was getting so low was it just a psychological game to turn bro & sis against you when near the end of the money he substantialy increases the money to both you and your Mum? Could this be seen from a receivers position to make any practicle sense?
Can't recall if you ever commented on the corrupt Lord Chancellors Visitors Report of ????????? which I attached to an earlier email.. I know one example of a corrupt Lord Chancellors report does not make all the visitors corrupt but after seeing that report I would never rely-on any one report which according to that courts own corrupt rules, also these reports are secret without an order of the court for disclosure. If you do wish to use as an example of this courts corrupt rules allowing it to rely on its own agents report I will place out there in the public domain.
Considering that you are up against a corruption which exists within the legal profession and reaching into the very judiciary, establishment authority you need a jury for any hearing..
May 4 2012 CONCERNED WEB WATCHER Hi Michael.
You are being denied due process, which is treason under the Magna Carta.
I had a coaching session from Winston Shrout who informed me of this in a situation where I was also being denied due process.
He suggested I put together the following letter to the attorney general (Dominic Grieve):
I wish to claim my rights under the clause 39, Magna Carta 1215.
I understand that under the Magna Carta due process is guaranteed and should this right be denied to me, this is treason.
I am therefore sending you the attached Affidavit of Truth, as of necessity, from which you may draw a conclusion that there is an allegation that such a felony has been committed.
How soon can I expect you to prosecute?
As a courtesy, copy the judge and other party in on the correspondence.
As you see, it does entail you putting together an affidavit of truth, to accompany the letter.
I hope this may help.
May 4 2012 Read a letter from the CoP investigations team in response to a request in regard to the qualifications of Dr Khan specifically in 2001. Please note how the letter does not answer in full and therefore you need to write back again and presumeably wait another 2 months or 50 days to get a response when the rules say they expect to reply within 10 days!! Now, I have said in previous correspondence how the court of protection suffer from double speak in other words they do not answer questions fully or thoroughly so now we will write back, I wonder should I expect a response in 10 days or 50!! Read the original request and clearly see how the response does not fit the request!! Read our reply that incidently took 1 hour!
May 4 2012 JUDGEMENT DAY Coming soon!
May 4 2012 Read 2nd letter sent to Specialist listings at Manchester courts TONY STANDEN.
May 4 2012 RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY "JURY". Read article 6 section 2 listed upon the Civil Liberties Protection and Human Rights. Section 2. There must be a hearing before an independent and impartial court or tribunal established by law (including unbiased jurors) . The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law and to democracy itself.
The right applies to both criminal and civil cases.
May 3 2012 BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 Read the Bill of Rights 1689 and how a request for a trial to be judged by equal piers, a jury, in Law cannot be refused!
Protect yourself with this knowledge, for as we will prove very soon, Judges and magistrates dare not go against the Bill of Rights 1689, for it is the very statute they must obey.
May 3 2012 MP RECORDED MEETING Listen to the 45 minute meeting that took place on 13th April 2012 with our MP Gordon Marsden that I have phoned, left messages and sent emails in which Mr Marsden promised further intervention but has failed to respond. I am faced between the devil and the deep blue sea. I am slowly but surely being backed into a corner of injustice on the one hand and corruption on the other. I either have to face it or run away? If you listen to the meeting of 45 minutes in which confidentiality was promised but now my back is increasingly against the wall and so it has got to be released into the public domain to those whom have an interest of whats actually going on in the court of corruption without any form of redress thats investigated to satisfactory levels.
May 2 2012 Will Mum have to employ another solicitor again at £984! Read the 4th request mother has sent to HUGH JONES for her accounts 2011-2012 that have not been supplied and literally ignored causing neglect, ill treatment and in breach of Mental Capacity Act Rules.
Read his reply followed up by ours!! Plus further email here Read
May 1 2012 Read an email from Judge Peter Jackson.
May 1 2012 ADDENDUM Read an Addendum to hearing papers, faxed at 9.30am this morning.
April 30 2012 Judge Sir David Foskett is the so-called Judge presiding over what will be an unconstitutional, unlawful, unconsented to, star chamber administrative hearing, this Wednesday 2nd May 2012. This is the Judge that refused my request for a common law court with Jury stating the law does not provide for a jury in this situation and so the hearing will be dealt with by a Judge alone. Read the letter from the Judge Sir David Foskett that is depriving me of due process and is more than likely about to commit perjury on Wednesday by presiding over the unlawful hearing that is part of the Judicial Dictatorship now operating openly within the UK. Tomorrow I am going to fax to this Mr Foskett an "Addendum" to my previous faxed 15 pages. This person is only a flesh and blood man just like me when he serves himself up in this unconsented to hearing, because as consent has been refused his status simply does not exist as a Judge. He will in effect be placing himself under a situation of liability as an "administrator" & NOT a Judge, unprotected from the unwarranted priveliged position he holds. In his vest and underpants he is the same as me, but maybe not as pretty! What Mr Foskett is failing to understand is that a court is there for a place of remedy and remedy by the current bias to hand is not forthcoming. When a legal entity such as PANNONE s are in the frame how is it fair for another judicial entity such as Judge going to Judge in a fair and impartial manner. Simple.com he is not! And so impartiality and only a Jury will suffice, Thank you!
April 30 2012 Read how the Judge Peter Jackson has suddenly now decided to get involved but to ignore the previous correspondence sent to him.
April 30 2012 Read a prepared 15 pages of Statutory Declaration of Notice of Understanding & Intent sent by email or letters and or faxed to, Manchester Civil Justice Centre, Kenneth Clarke MP & Lord Chancellor of Justice department, David Cameron & Nick Clegg's office and BBC or other associated persons.
April 30 2012 Read a reminder of an open letter issued on the PANNONE and the court 1st Feb 2012 with regard to an unlawful hearing that was proceded without my consent in a letter handed to the court here to Read from the 26th Jan 2012 and the Judge Victoria Sharp's order here to Read. Now PANNONE s are proceeding again without my consent to a star chamber hearing this coming Wednesday for a permanent injunction in an hearing again sent a statement of refusal of consent but consent to a common law jury court would be acceptable. On the 10th Feb 2012 an open reply letter was sent to the Judge Justice Sharp that has been re-faxed to the court today as to remind the sitting judge, here to read Read.
April 29 2012 Read a letter to Cameron and Clegg written 2 years ago, re faxed to day!! Faxed +442079250918
April 29 2012 Read a sample of what was happening to us 11 long years ago and take note whilst reading this that unbeknown to my mother he was charging her £507 weekly amounting to annual fees of £26,377 you will be shocked. The suffering is no different today it goes on & on and on. There are alot more letters to be published about the corrospendence with Hugh Jones.
April 28 2012 Mind & Matter Link
Of course we’re looking at an uphill struggle, and it won’t come about overnight, some will say it’s even impossible, as what’s already happening is a drip-drip effect of our rights being eroded and were losing more and more of our liberty and freedom every day, that’s why it’s equally important that there are those who are prepared to counteract this negative effect. It’s happened before and throughout mans history, and there is no real reason it cannot occur again, though more importantly is how can it be achieved, – and how it can is by making sure we breakdown the divide and rule barriers, come together as a collective and drive-out our present slave masters and corrupt political leaders.
The time has come for us to rise and stand up against our true enemies, not us against each other, but us verses ‘them’, you should be ready to protest and fight for your voices to be heard. – If this is not really you, then let your job be done by the fountain pen, biro or pencil, which are all mightier than the sword, use your keyboard and the internet, text messages and phone calls to help lift-up and uncover every rock and stone, make no hiding place possible for these demonic worshipers of death, mayhem and hate. For one good thing on our side, is that these parasitical scum leaders have to live their lives in full view of us, watch em, expose their every sleazy scam, watch how their spending our money 24/7-365 days of the year, make it known to them, that we know their attempted schemes, plots and plans. Let them know we know their only in their positions of power, to look after themselves, and that when their caught stealing, lying and cheating, we must demand their resignations, or sack them and send them to jail.
April 28 2012 Read an email request sent to Judge Jackson for a signed copy of his order.
April 28 2012 Read a written, signed, faxed request, sent to the courts for signed copies of the 3 recent directions orders made by 3 Judges where we believe miscarriages of Justice are taking place and therefore, what risk assessment strategies are in place for redress if any, in these matters. When we're all health and safety enforced should the Justice system too have the same and so what are the risk assessments in place to protect against a miscarriage of Justice?
April 27 2012 Read about the serious campaign for Truth and Justice thats on a very united front. A fully independent; non state funded; influenced or controlled community organization group set up in the UK, for the benefit of ordinary local people deliberately frustrated and corruptly denied justice or due redress in UK Courts. Date: This Monday 23rd April 2012
Time: 10:am for 10 days.
Venue: outside the Royal Courts of inJustice. Fighting Judicial Corruption & Unlawful Imprisonments!!
April 27 2012 Read another follow up email to Judge Peter Jackson informing him of Pannone s hearing with harassment charges in clear breach of Mental Capacity Act section 5.
April 27 2012 Read a letter being faxed to the court in Manchester in connection with our refusal of consent to the hearing intended of Hugh Jones of Pannone s so called harrasment claim for a permanent injuction.
April 27 2012 Read an email to Judge Peter Jackson's new clerk whom we have only just discovered his old one apparently retired without informing us in the middle of case and where email corrospondence to the old clerk was boucing back undelivered!
April 26 2012 Read the letter from the courts in which a request for a jury court has been denied for PANNONE s harassment charges and where it is an obvious denial of due process. When a person is treated unfairly by the government, including the courts, he is said to have been deprived of or denied due process.
April 25 2012 Brynn, Mum, James, Cheryl, Me and John, BBQ
Stunning night picture at 9pm having BBQ at Cheryls Villa. Spend life with who makes you happy, not who you have to impress. Facebook entry: Michael Clarke :- To those relatives trying to deny mum her human rights to freedom and civil liberty, where do you think she would rather be? With me or in a care home likely to be abused! Sheer stupidity your suffering from, don't you dare try and enforce upon my mother your own low life morals! (Their recent statement to court being placed right here soon)
April 24 2012 Read a letter sent in response to the letter that the Chief Executive of the OPG Alan Eccles sent to our MP. Our disgust is clearly visible and our anger grows more substantial. Read also a letter to our MP.
April 24 2012 Read a letter sent from the OPG to MP just received. With MPs email to Read & our Reply to our MP.
April 24 2012 Read email request for travel expenses to attend resolution meeting planned for Friday next.
April 24 2012 Read email to MP Gordon Marsden requesting an update.
April 24 2012 Read an email sent to MP Kenneth Clarke Member of Parliament for Rushcliffe "Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice" whom we have written to once before without getting any reply! Read it, dated 2nd June 2011. Read about Kenneth Clarke. Fax +441223335062
April 23 2012 Read about what you did not know about the Taxes & The Crown.
It is apparent to any wakeful observer that the courts have accelerated their gradual move away from protecting people under common law against corporations. Now the British Government has become transparent in demonstrating that it is no more than an arm of a corrupt murderous corporation utilising international and domestic terrorism to increase the profits for its senior shareholders. We now see the courts are openly claiming that Statute law is superior to the constitution and common law, in what is a treasonous move to make the mass of mankind no more than chattels to psychopathic few. Under common law it is a criminal offense for the Master of the Court of Protection to interfere with other courts. This would severely hamper Denzel Slush from protecting the cabal of fraudulent Probate Lawyers that infest this parasitic administrative legal fiction.
April 23 2012 Read a reply from an email complaint of institutionalised corruption within the Office of the Public Guardian sent to the AUDIT COMMISION.
April 23 2012 Read more revelations coming to light about PANNONE s HUGH JONES.
April 22 2012 Waiting time.. Sitting it out in the Spanish sunshine whilst the powers that be decide on the next course of action is complete form of relaxation for me mum and James, pictured here with 37 year friend Brynn and Cheryl of 20 years. The CoP can mess us around and mess us around all they want but the problem just ain't going to go away. Tomorrow is the tenth day I have been waiting for a reply from the new Chief Executive of the Court Mr Alan Eccles and though we wrote to him with renewed optimism it does appear to be waining fast. Not only has he not responded but we await long overdue replies from the complaints team of the court and also HUGH JONES yet again. Is another Commercial Lien needed to kick em up the jacksy and or the enforcement of the outstanding one! The Judge Justice Peter Jackson is due on the 23rd of April tomorrow to decide on mothers application to be released but because of HUGH JONES assistant DAVID HILTONS refusal to cooperate with independant Psychologist found in Liverpool not a thing has been done!! I wonder why?? So..
No response from HUGH JONES for the request of £600 for a report on the report from 2001 to investigate a miscarriage of justice 11 years ago!
No response from the CoP complaints team regarding no response from Hugh Jones & his refusal to cooperate in a court order!! & our request for information under the freedom of information laws on the qualifications of the so called "special visitor" Dr Khan?
No response from the Judge Justice Peter Jackson about HUGH JONES obstructing the court order to agree bilaterally to an independant psychologist..
No response from Judge Foskitt to ask for a common law court for PANNONE s false charges of harassment failing to recognise Capcacity Act Section 5 that protects carers from any legal liabilities.
No response from MP Gordon Marsden, where we await his promised further intervention.
No response from the new man at the helm, Alan Eccles!!! In the mean time my mothers application to be released is now 6 months old and dated back to November last year! She is now approaching her 72nd birthday and has been in the Court of Protection JAIL of hell for near on 12 years at costs to her of probably in excess of £300,000 that in reality she never lost capacity and so this money stolen from her!
April 20 2012 Read another long suffering client of PANNONE s HUGH JONES and the Court of Protection/Office of the Public Guardian whom would rather give it all to charity to get their lives back! We can't all be wrong HUGH JONES,
April 20 - 2012 We believe you can stop corruption...
Why else would we go on. Civil injustice will lead to civil unrest let's hope we can find the peaceful means to stop corruption. There should be in this day and age a clear and concise right of recourse that's truely transparent, not dependant on money, and effective for those whom are supposedly protected. How dare they use the words Court of Protection without effecting a risk assessment policy of ensuring rights of recourse are there and are clear, without such a path available they can only expect allegations of corruption. The SRA is not effective and even the MP admits after complaining to the Cheif exec. it does pose the question of where else does one go and if your MP can tell you this then what other words can be used to describe whats happening under the guise of protection when in reality the words CoN, Court of Neglection are the reality as the definition of neglect is the failure to do what a reasonable person would do. Common Law is the means to fix this and the Commercial Lien we used, unfortunately, money is the root and the evil that's preventing it's use. Not I might add lawfully, but unlawfully. We don't need a money orientated statute administrative system thats corrupted by cash when the common laws of the land, if used will fix the problem! What is the Judiciary & the Executive afraid of? Truth & Redundancy!
Read about a study of widespead government corruption In philosophical, theological, or moral discussions, corruption is the moral impurity or deviation from an ideal.
APRIL 19 2012 A birthday celebration ...
for Cheryl, our best friend on her 49th taken today at a celebratory lunch outing to the MIRALMONTE Restaurante in Coin Spain. A sense of normality has to continue for mum and us in the fog of corruption we are having to suffer and being in Spain provides that exile away from that suffering allowing us feel for a short period a sense of normality!! We only wish this could be the norm.
April 18 2012 Life goes on.. Taken late last night in a bar near Marbella where friend Terri Fox was performing his drag comedian act, Me Mum and James having a beer till after midnight soaking up some spanish life once more in a Brit Bar!
April 16 2012 Read a brief insight to the clear and concise breaches of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 that HUGH JONES & PANNONES & The CoP & not least of all, Judges, that continue to breach this "act" with impunity. In this short highlighted document take note of the very last line highlighted which refers to CRIMINAL NEGLECT of a patient in which I believe HUGH JONES the CoP and PANNONEs & Judges are all guilty of by vicariously neglecting a patients rights & her carer, under their control causing an effect of gross ill treatment which should rank as potentially imprisonable for periods of up to 5 years as shown here! This is the level we are now at where we deem those responsible to answer these charges that we seriously wish to bring upon them all. Link
April 14 2012 09.36am Link reminder of my mother Ann Clarke's Position Statement to read, that was presented on the 12th of March 2012 to the Judge Mr Justice Peter Jackson that we sorely do not want forgot and so re-linked here to be re read if needs be.
April 13 2012 18.30pm Link to an email request sent to new Chief Executive of the Office of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN - ALAN ECCLES. We live in hope, with renewed optimism, that Mr Alan Eccles will do the office of the public guardian a justice that is so needed in a sea of injustice's that its accused of from a wide variety of people up and down the UK and abroad.
April 13 2012 16.30 to 17.30 A one hour meeting with our MP Listen here to Gordon Marsden whom has I hope gathered some clarity to our severe problems being encountered with Court of Protection and its deputy Hugh Jones. The tone of the meeting was quite intense but only to be expected. An undertaking of confidentiality was asked for and has been respected until after several calls and emails made that resulted in nothing, no reply's etc and so the deal is off. Correspondence expected to pass between our MP and the newly appointed Chief Executive of the Court of Protection Alan Eccles and thus we await to see if the new brush will sweep clear the skeletons remaining to bring about even more clarity and transparency so desperately needed within the CoP and to rid itself of its reputation as a "CoN".
April 13 2012 15.00pm CoP Court Chief Change Link to Ex Chief Exec. MARTIN JOHN does a runner and Kenneth Clarke appoints Alan Eccles as Chief Executive!
April 13 2012 11.17am Link to further formal complaints being made without response from the court of protection and Hugh Jones.
April 13 2012 08.55am Link to a brief encounter outside the office's of MP Gordon Marsden with the elusive man himself.
April 12 2012 Link to the good one's. Samuel Smith & Chris Cuddihee. Article of interest.
April 12 2012 SECRECY! 07.12am No email forthcoming of Psychology direct, Gemma Williams, that's what's the scariest thing about this whole saga is the closed shop routine of untransparency, how these so called professionals make such statements as, "I'm sorry but we don't deal with 'third party clients' we only deal direct with solicitors!".
The SRA whom one can complain to SOLICITORS REGULATORY AUTHORITY will not tell you any progress or updates to an investigation or even whether its complete. The court of protection can complete an investigation of 7 long months and their result is a 3 line reply and the full report will not be disclosed, why? Because, "its secret". The whole system seems to be a closed shop, with the exception of one or two whom seem to have their integrity intact and will deal with individuals. What or whom are they protecting? What is so secretive about the recruitment of a psychologist? Whom would want it to be so secret and more importantly, why? If there is a psychologist working in Liverpool whom has the relevant backround and experience why is the information being held back Gemma? If your organisation's name say's PSYCHOLOGY 'DIRECT' then why is it not so, "DIRECT"? Email to Gemma Williams
April 11 2012 16.45 Jane Ireland Report on SPECIAL VISITORS! Link to the full report by Jane Ireland about so called "SPECIAL VISITOR" reports and the misgivings that have surfaced.
April 11 2012 16.30 Link to listen to phonecall Link to an email sent to Gemma Williams of PSYCHOLOGY DIRECT who has become upset about being recorded in conversations where we hereby provide our best explanation.
April 11 2012 3pm Telephone call Link & letters posted to Manchester High Court Tony Standen to request a common law court with Jury for Pannone's harassment charges to go before Judge Justice Foskitt next week the 18th April 2012 for the consideration of this request.
April 11 2012 Link to 2 letters arrived this morning from MP Gordon Marsden, one addressed to me and mother and the other is a copy of a letter sent to Chief Executive of The Public Guardian Martin John. REPLY LETTER by post and email
April 11 2012 Link to todays 2nd formal complaint sent to Court of Protection, Hugh Jones and MP Gordon Marsden.
April 10 2012 Facebook Comment Today The gradual perversion of the Laws by the professionals operating in secrecy behind the closed doors of this establishment authority masquerading its self as a court of Law are in stealth setting themselves up as a Stazi class of their own with the mentality of gangsters to line their own pockets at the expense of the vulnerable and the elderly by way of professional racketeering and property fraud.
April 10 2012 CORRUPTION Link to an email request sent today to all listed panel deputies of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN office whom are not all believed to "piss in the same pot" and we hope that in a thick fog of corruption some shining lights might appear!
April 2012 Taken 4 weeks previous Recent pic of mum relaxing 4 weeks ago outside Cheryls villa in Spain. Where would you want to be! Being parceled up into a care home to suit the relatives that are seeking an early inheritance & or the judiciary's satisfied overrated fee thefts, or being free thinking to live where and with whom you choose! I think its a no brainer don't you? Being free is a basic HUMAN RIGHT! My mother has had her freedom stolen from her. Her Human rights to choices stolen from her! Her money stolen from her! Her money mal administered! Not satisfied with what they've already had! Now they want her house, I hope the purpetrators of these crimes in process have the same situations come to bear on them in their old age let's see the tables turn as they surely will. I hope I'm around to watch it.
April 7 01.47am 2012 Link to voicemail message from Sam Cullen, assistant to Gordon Marsden MP. Finally some sort of message conveyed that the matter is being looked into, we were beginning to lose faith in our MP. We await his letter in the hope he can convey some sort of clarity in a sea of injustice that's being spoon fed to us week on week.
April 6 2012 Easter Weekend We enter our weekend being non the wiser, being given the runaround by the Courts and their cronies PANNONEs, not too mention our very own MP Gordon Marsden whose constituency office staff all seem to be in cahoots together, where nothing is being done what so ever. What a sad system we have all contributed too to cause such misery to the most vulnerable people of society. Patience wearing thin we will give matters a little more time but I am not prepared to put my mother through much more of the shit we are having to endure. She and I want to get on with the rest of whats left of lives in some sort of peace. God help all those in similar pain whom do not have the same determinations. My mother requested release from the court on capacity grounds in November last year, 6 months ago and still she is being treated like an animal without any respect for her wishes. Despicable!
It does not seem to matter which political party one writes to!
There are growing concerns that under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 the Court of Protection has been handed sweeping powers without adequate scrutiny and openess. This departs from the general principle of open justice held by other courts.
Holding its cases behind closed doors, the Court has the power to order that people with severe learning difficulties are sterilised, undergo abortions or have life-support switched off. It can even impose “experimental” treatments on these patients without their consent.
The Act also gives the Court power to order procedures “where that procedure or treatment must be carried out using a degree of force to restrain the person concerned”.
Previously High Court judges were asked to rule whether people with severe learning difficulties in the care of health authorities and councils should undergo treatments if they believed it was in their best interests. However, these cases were held in public and could be reported by the media.
According to sources Sir Nicholas Wall, the President of the Family Division sitting in the Court of Protection, ruled some time ago that a woman with cancer of the uterus must receive treatment even though she has a phobia of hospitals and needles. He stated that this was because she has a learning difficulty and so was judged to be incapable of deciding on her own “best interests”.
He then allegedly ruled that doctors should be allowed to sedate the 55 year-old in her own home, using a drug hidden in a glass of squash, and then detain her in a ward following the essential treatment.
The case was only the second in the Court to be made public.
And yes, this is in England and the year is 2012!
05/04/2012 11.55am Email to Judge and Court of Protection Link to email to JUDGE Peter Jackson, Hugh Jones, Court of Protection & Gemma Williams of Psychology Direct. Ask yourself after listening to the 2 phonecalls who would you say is obstructing JUSTICE?
05/04/2012 11.30am 2nd Phone call to Gemma Link to a second phonecall to Gemma of Psychology Direct whom has put time and effort in independantly to find a specialist that is being obstructed by HUGH JONES the deputy's assistant DAVID HILTON! The court actually ordered an equally agreeable independant expert in which has been sought where nothing else is on offer where David Hilton quite clearly is making it difficult for us to cooperate with the court! Make your own assumptions!
05/04/2012 11am Corruption rears it head again! Link to this mornings telephone call from Gemma at Psychology Direct whom was searching for a specialist Nuerocognotive Clinical Psycologist who has experience in Expressive Dysphasia to assess mum again as an independant & to liase with Dr Donna Schelewa and her previous 2 reports confirming mums capacity. Gemma has been stopped in her tracks because the court demands one of its own "Special Visitors", one assumes these must be the one's that channel 4 TV did a report about involving corruption! Not on your Nellie, Mr Justice Peter Jackson!
05/04/2012 Snooper Law Theresa May wants to be able to read our e-mails, so, everybody is forwarding her their spam.
Her e-mail address is: firstname.lastname@example.org
Don't say I told you. ;-) They are trying to stop you smoking They are trying to stop you drinking They don't want you socialising Next is your internet
04/04/2012 Petition to stop big brother Link TO THE PETITION to stop The government whom wants to give itself new powers to spy on our internet and email use in real time -- but a massive national outcry can save the internet and stop the big brother law.Public outrage is growing and news reports suggest that Cameron and Clegg are being forced to slow down their march to secure draconian powers to spy on what we do online. If we pile on the pressure now, we can persuade them to back off the big brother bill for good.The last time this was mooted in Parliament it failed precisely because of strong public opposition. Our call to Cameron, Clegg and Home Secretary Theresa May can protect our privacy and save the internet. Sign the petition to beat back big brother and forward widely:
04/04/2012 Phonecall to Manchester Court Telephone conversation today with Manchester court resulted in letters being dispatched to clarify the request for a common law court with jury request in PANNONEs so-called harassment claim.
04/04/2012 Miscarriage of Justice Link to an email to HUGH JONES for mother requesting funds to Investigate a miscarriage of justice report to be conducted by Dr Donna Schelewa on the bogus SPECIAL VISITOR from the Court of Protection "Jail" sent 2001 to assess my mother.
04/04/2012 Link to reply from Dr Donna Schelewa whom is prepared to conduct a report on the original Dr Khan's report of 2001 in which was the cornerstone foundation for keeping mum in the Court of Protection "Jail" that has cost her in excess of £250,000.
03/04/2012 Blast from the past, Mum's birthday August 9th 2008 at a gay wedding in Malaga, me n mum at David and Terri Fox's celebration.
03/04/2012 Link to further update regarding search for an expert.
03/04/2012 Link to search for a specialised expert.
03/04/2012 Link to email reply to PANNONE with reference to their proposed harassment claim court date.
03/04/2012 Link to email to HUGH JONES requesting detailed accounts submitted for 2011-2012.
03/04/2012 Note to an in person call at MP Gordon Marsdens constituency office for an update.
03/04/2012 Link to email to Dr Donna Schelewa regarding completing an assessment of a 2001 report by Dr Khan in his 50 minutes verbally recorded and his written report with regard to potential claims of negligence.
03/04/2012 When the perpetrator of abuse, just so happens to be "The Office of the Public Guardian", who do you complain to?
03/04/2012 Link to Age UK 2012 guide to deprovation of liberty safeguards & Human Rights Act 1998(section 10/5 compensation)
03/04/2012 Link to deprovation of liberty safeguards.
02/04/2012 Link to an email of formal complaint to the court of protection regarding a lack of formal reply after a period of 16 days has passed requesting information under the freedom of information act.
01/04/2012 Link to an email sent to court Specialist listings TONY STANDEN refusing consent to a proposed hearing of Harassment claim by PANNONE unless conducted by a common law court with Jury.
29/3/2012 Link to a reply from Pannone LLP accepting a private meeting to try for a resolution.
29/3/2012 Link to an email to PANNONE LLP resolution team.
28/3/2012 Link to an American article on testamentary capacity and undue influence. Link pdf format.
28/3/2012 Link to an email from the Judge Peter Jackson and our follow up response.
27/3/2012 Link email &
Phonecall this morning from Dr Donna Schelewa explaining she has been on holiday and that to recruit another expert witness with regard to mums new capacity assessment that care must be provided that Mrs Clarke has a condition of Expressive Dysphasia meaning she knows what she wants to say but struggles to get it out. Based on this condition it is vitally important that the expert witness sought to conduct an assessment has experience to cover this condition otherwise the result can come out completely different. •People with expressive dysphasia are not fluent and have difficulty forming words and sentences. There are grammatical errors and difficulty finding the right word. In severe cases they do not speak spontaneously but they usually understand what is said to them.
26/3/2012 Link to email to JUDGES clerk for the judge to submit the enclosed questions to put to the SPECIAL VISITOR.
26/3/2012 Link email that no response has been received from the original sent 10 days ago requesting to know what the qualifications were of the SPECIAL VISITOR Dr Khan back in 2001.
26/3/2012 Link to information request from Jane Ireland.
26/3/2012 Link to email sent to HUGH JONES requesting the judge's email address of his clerk as was promised in the administrative hearing but not received.
25/3/2012 Link to an email of further possibility recommended by Jane Ireland.reply stating too busy and a request for a possible collegue's availability!
25/3/2012 Link to an email sent to a Caroline Mulligan whom is a recommended by Jane Ireland forensic expert in the matters to hand requesting an urgent appointment to assess mother and compare notes to previous assessments.
23/3/2012 Link to email sent with urgency to MP's John Hemming & Gordon Marsden, Hugh Jones & Jane Ireland who is conducting an investigation into special visitors reports.
23/3/2012 Link to Judge Peter Jackson's order from court arrived today. In relation to mums applicaion to be released from the court of protection.
22/3/2012 Further discussions today with a correspondent are hopefully going to result in a certain radio station interview to be forthcoming. The website has been sold/transferred to a foreign company for investment to redesign and enlarge upon its potential. With agreements on its primary purpose and function which its primary aim is to bring about justice for those whom need protection from The Court of Protection and its Predatory Guardians.
22/3/2012 Link to further investigations now being conducted by MP John Hemming whom is linking up with our own MP Gordon Marsden.
21/3/2012 Link to the controversial Commercial Lien/CLAIM that has been sent to MP John Hemming & MP Gordon Marsden for their perusal about our claim that we were forced into, by having no other route of recourse to proceed down that did not involve the use of money, that my mother was being denied the right to by the deputy HUGH JONES of PANNONE LLP. An Englishmans home is his castle and we all have the right to defend this however we so choose. The above course of action was what we believe our only option in the face of a government juggernaut that was heading our direction riding roughshod over anything and anybody that stood in its path. COMMON LAW is slowly being eradicated by STATUTES in which CONSENT is needed but now denied and we urge people to stand up for whats right and to correct whats going wrong in our current corrupt future, thats being laid out before us, unless we put it all to a STOP!
Visit today to our local MPs offices and spoke with John Jones whom said yes he was familiar with the case and all the paperwork on it is down in London with Sam Cullen Mr Marsdens assistant whom John said he would ring to confirm for Mr Marsden to liase with MP John Hemming.
A brother and sister who claim to love their mother, made no contact with her on mother's day in spite of mother's mobile being charged and waiting beside her for calls. Today we waited for the postman to deliver belated cards but no cards came! How can they claim that they care about their own mother?
18/3/2012 Link to John Hemming MP who at last is to raise our case with others in the House of Commons on Wednesday next we hope and pray that this matter is drawing to a close after 11 years of sheer mental torture!
Link to yesterday's front page news in the Daily Mail about hired gun, fake doctors reports, to suit the paymasters.
Mum pictured this afternoon with close friend celebrity Alice Barry (Lilliam from "Shameless") at our close friends farmhouse in Todmoden where we had tea today and chatted with connections to a Daily Mail correspondent whom was providing advice on what are the best avenues to proceed down for publicity to be extended. Within this meeting we talked with company executive whom are offering their media services to redesign the websign for maximum attraction complimented with blogging facility possible forum.
16/3/2012 Link to a serious enquiry with the court of protection.
16/3/2012 Link channel four news 13/3/2012 scandal of SPECIAL VISITORS
16/3/2012 Link to the courts "SPECIAL VISITORS"
Scandal of 'unqualified' experts who advise our family courts: Decisions about the care of thousands of children routinely flawed
Family courts and how incompetent (but highly paid) so-called experts are failing families.
Thursday 18.14 15/03/2012 The Daily Mail whom, I tomorrow will have a contact, to arrange a meeting with to discuss taking on the exposure of our plight.
Thursday 15.00 15/3/2012 Link to Queens Bench High Court and a Judge's full job description.
Thursday 14.14 15/03/2012
Statute Law or Common Law which is THE superior and are we being denied our rights to due process!
Thursday 15/03/2012 09.42 Link letter to Manchester Family Courts.
Thursday 15/03/2012 08.36 Link to reporting miscarriages of Justice. A Manchester group that meets twice a month based from Oldham. These people are collating what they see information for action against injustices, "There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest"
Wednesday 14/03/2012 13.10 Link email to courts and to HUGH JONES about our request to relist the case as we believe the process to have been corrupt.
Wednesday 14/03/2012 13.10 Link letter of reply to Pannone about their harassment claim!
Wednesday 14/03/2012 13.10 Link letter from PANNONEs asking to engage in a statute court process of their claim I have harassed them!!!
Wednesday 14/03/2012 00.14 Link to judges guide to determine capacity USA style.
People have the right to make foolish or eccentric decisions and to govern their own affairs,
unless they lack decision-making capacity and cannot understand the consequences of their
Wednesday 14/03/2012 00.08 Link to a telephone recording in June 2001 to Clinical expert Dr Hana Al Hamar and what she had to say about my mothers capacity and that it was intact and her rights to make decisions should not have been removed 11 years ago and whilst we still have up to date reports to confirm her capacity to make decisions she still is being illegally stopped from doing so. This report from 4 months ago -
Link 2011 report
Link 2010 report
Link 2001 report
Link 05.09.2001 Dr Khan recording of the sent court special visitor whom was only present less than an hour and did not do any clinical exam. Mum was asked to get her own reports that took 4 hours each and she had to pay for them usually £1000 each and when the court of protection special visitor came he rejected those reports in less than an hour!
Link 06.10.11 to listen to the secret courts own visitor meeting with mum in which the court refused to supply a copy of this report. I wonder why?
A blind man can see she has capacity so - Judge Peter Jackson I know you stated theres no money for this case and I know you stated you had not really got time but hey, my mother is "doing time" in your court of protection JAIL.. take some time Peter to do your job as a Judge and positively review all the facts.
Tuesday 13.03.2012 10:44
The most realistic thing I have learned came from The British Constittution Group whom told me that the most fantastic thing about true common law is its all basically COMMON SENSE and if whats happenning to you does not seem like common sense then you can be sure its in breach of your common laws. Now everytime I am encountering court enclosures in statute ways I am encountering Judges and QCs etc saying well this is a common law court, but its not. Any court without a jury is a statute one, one which does require your consent and to state to you that it does not is a lie. Another thought, if you have 4 reports of confirmed capacity does it make sense to obtain a 5th especially when they have not got time or money to process it.
Where would you say is the common sense in that and so this demonstartes the difference of STATUTE law which don't make sense and is only because its twisted to suit the executives and the judiciary in order or in the favour of whats at the root of the EVIL, MONEY!
COMMON LAW makes common sense and common law cannot be twisted or manipulated in the same easy ways of statute rules by the executive and judiciary. What am I talking about? Its obvious really is'nt it - CORRUPTION. Link to information about Judges Oaths. Yesterday the judge said he was acting on his oath of office.
Back to top
Tuesday 13.03.2012 09:00
Last night's reflection on events has not gone down well and though today should be a day to feel a lighter note of happiness as its me & my partners 3rd Anniversary its tinged with some sadness of reflection of how things are for mum. It feels to me that this court of protection is not being run from the rigid rules of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 but is being manipulated by biased uncorroborated testimony from relatives and so matters are being extended to considering a persons vulneraility issue's without proof, where proof is not needed as the sole consideration should be as stated The Mental Capacity Act 2005 stage 1 and stage 2. My mother failed stage 1 and so it is agreed allround that she does have some impairment of the mind but stage 2 of the act where decisions can be made she passes and so under the rules is deemed as having capacity. Now one would ask the question as I did yesterday if there is doubt should a person be detained on doubt? We know the answer is NO! This is where the statute system then comes into play with its failings, where a single judge can take a single A4 paper of uncorroberated accusations from relatives whom have other motives and have no interest in the patients wishes & a single piece of A4 from a solicitor whom is also discharging the patients affairs with impunity for mismanagement and then proceed to hinder the patients application by delays and ignorance to evidence stating that there is no money for this case and I do not have the time really! If there is no money & he does not have the time really THEN WHY DOES HE NEED 5 REPORTS TO CONFIRM HER CAPACITY?? HOW SILLY? becasue at the very least we have already proved doubt, and if there is doubt you cannot convict, certainly in a common law court with a jury of 12 - does everybody understand why we want real justice not a KANGAROO ONE.
CONCLUSION DRAWN: You fill in the blanks because from where I am sitting you can be judged off vulnerability without any evidence of foul play and be placed within an institution without laws in place to keep you there! Furthermore if there is anyone around that person, wanting to defend or shout about the injustice served upon them from a refused consent statute injustice, then he too shall suffer further refused consent statute injustice to silence the critic usually by incarceration. This is commonly known as a dictatorship! The morals of UK British Justice have clearly deteriated into
chaos and what will follow eventually from civil injustice? CIVIL UNREST. A statute justice system built and evolved from short cuts, from an arrangement with the executive, all connected to money is going to be the downfall of this country, its already here and happening under our very feet. We used to be proud of our justice system as a nation. How sad.
Back to top
Monday 12.03.2012 20:00 A brother and sister's joint statement revealed at court today. Angela Wild and Kevin Clarke would like to see their mothers house sold against her will, their mother placed into care against her will, their own brother whom cared for their mother for 16 years thrown onto the street & the deputy Hugh Jones to remain as deputy in charge of their mothers affairs!! Beggars belief!! Still in a state of shock from reading this statement the Judge Justice Peter Jackson although his demeanor appeared reasonable he's answer to where consent was refused to statute hearings he said it was not required and so a ruling with an order infavour of HUGH JONES to instruct yet another Doctor or as stated "special" visitor to further have mother undergo another assessment of capacity(the 5th) charged at mothers expense another £1000. After a request for a common law court the answer came from the judge that this matter is a civil court and so this matter needed resolution from all parties to assist in cooperation. There was an exchange of conversaton regarding the injustice previously suffered and that we believed that the statute courts were not serving us with real justice. Talk of Ann's capacity was shifted to her vulnerability and that undue influence & accusations are laid from relatives of my misappropriation of funds, so I asked the judged "is a persons capacity judged on vulnerability"? he stated it was not, they are judged off capacity only and so the conversation went around for an hour about why would the court require yet another report and that if their was doubt should not her detention by the court be beyond reasonable doubt. He claimed he would feel more comfortable with another report as a comparison to what's already been written.
Before entering the court outside waiting for our arrival was a PANNONE LLP document server whom served upon me an unsealed, unsigned and unlawful injuction order under their Harrassment Charges. Hugh Jones stated after asking, during recess, that the first port of call is for me to pay them £25,000 into their offices as the clock would be now ticking. He indicated this matter is entirely seperate and I pointed out that this was impossible because if I was not caring for my mother why would I have protested outside his office or served a commercial lien. They are 100% linked as Mr Hugh Jones knows and that when he reduced my mothers income in Spain to below poverty not even covering her pension and DLA, as her carer needed to act in order to protect my mother, protection from any liability under Mental Capacity Act rules exists for carers and this he made no further comment.
One can read it all many ways. One can easily take the view though that when Hugh Jones commented that within 3 months there must be a trial for these harrassment charges and the judge inside the court commented on delays in mums case could be 3 months, if one adds 2+2 one could conclude a conspiracy to get me before courts prior to having to finalise mums request for discharge. Well, we'll see! All will come out in the wash! The things that I can conclude are that the judge stated refused consent to this hearing was irrelevant. HUGH JONESs unlawful, refused consent, unsealed, unsigned order of injunction he states is now in force. When asked for clarification HUGH JONESs said and I quote I'm not trying to be coy but I don't know its a seperate issue entirely which we all know aint. The most crushing blow for me today was to read that your own flesh and blood seem to have a complete disregard for their own mothers wishes and that they continue to believe that not only are the 3 reports corrupt and not believeable, but that HUGH JONESs also is a diamond in the face of evidence available to the contary. I feel very low and very sad, mainly for mum. Its extremely distressing to think that her own flesh and blood would do what they do without care for her thoughts. On entry to the court they were greeted by mum pleased to see them but her first words uttered were that they must understand she wants to stay with Michael. How sincerely distressing for her will it be if they get their way and she is dragged off to a care home!! Of course that will be over my dead body or of course I do believe that PANNONEs conspiracy plan is to get me before a statute, friendly to them judge and have me incarcerated for the truths published here on this website. Its all very sick in its entirety! If anyone out there is considering looking after their relatives after an accident let this whole saga be a warning. We are supposed to be encouraging the care of the elderly in their own homes but the conspiracies here show very dark forces at work.
God help us all when we get old especially those relatives whom have property or money where their own will treat you as a child and will force their views upon you regardless of what you plead. What goes around will come around and those whom commit such actions will hopefully suffer the same or similar fait. One of my deepest singular fears for mum is that when her dysphasia or trouble speaking plays up then I have learnt to literally mind read what she wants as sometimes she can't put it into words, I visualise some uncaring carer just ignoring her request or treating her with contempt as you do about these things. I also am extremely concerned about the restriction placed upon her smoking routines where she takes great pleasure in being within her own domain smoking as she pleases. These major strong concerns I have for mum in her latter years that as long as I am a free individual will not happen without me being dead or incacerated! So bring it on you slaves to STATUTEs you have 2 choices. Get me into prison or see me dead because without one or the other there aint no Judge in this land gonna seperate me and my mother with or without your bungalow funds. Tell you what me and mum have already discussed we would rather live without it and this will be a topic for us over the next period of waiting time. I am sick to my stomach for mum and what she wanted that I seem helpless to put in place for her! The suffering goes on at the hands of STATUTES.
Further observations made were that because we realised this case was not being considered solely from her capacity based on the HUGH JONES statements I had read before court indicated that I needed to supply a bundle of of paperwork where within that paperwork lay the evidence to support my claims about Hugh Jones. When I ofered it to all three parties none seemed interested as though it was a forgone conclusion about what will happen. The Judge at the end of the hour long hearing offered to return the binder containing the evidence to support my claims against the deputy.
Suggesting he had no time to read it and that to save it for a main hearing if needed. That I found a little strange because had this been submitted to a court of common law jurisdiction am sure it would have had more importance. It appeared to me that the request from HUGH JONES was a forgone conclusion!
Monday 12.03.2012 06:30 Link to position statement merged with Hugh Jones statement and replies in bold.
Sunday 11.03.2012 20:55 Link to Hugh Jones statement and my reply in RED.
A trial that is unfolding on the internet that Pannone LLP are trying to shut down under an unlawful harrassment injunction that is unsigned by the judge, unserved under court rules and unconsented to by the defendant whom refused consent to statute acts unless a jury of 12 in a common law procedure was applied as is your right to insist upon but has been denied, flouting my legal lawful human rights fo fair trial under article 6 of convention rights. Through this media one can clearly see how statute so called justice can rush and ride roughshod over you without you knowing and thereby not giving you fair access to justice. Here you can clealry see how I have been given no time to submit statements etc needed and where demands can be made easily for excessive amounts of money from PANNONE to try and clearly deny you those lawful common rights that trust me, you are entitled.
Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40 Link to POSITION STATEMENT
Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40 Link to Statement of issue's
Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40 Link to Index Bundle
Thursday 08.03.2012 05:26 Link to a letter sent today, a formal request to ECHR (European Court of Human Rights & Protection of Civil Liberties) for formal intervention upon both cases in connection with my mothers care and her human rights breached alongside my own in matters related to the same.
Wednesday 07.03.2012 15:15 Link to more corruption & the Judge Justice Peter Jackson on Monday at 2pm 07/03/2012 don't look promising does it? The more research one does, the worse it gets.
Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:47 Link to PDF directions order just received about court hearing on Monday coming the 12th March where arrangements needed finalising before 4pm today.
Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:46 Link to email exchange with HUGH JONES
Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:30 Link to new information found out today in a recorded conversation with Preston Courts.
Prompt Reply from court of protection whom do not seem to know whats going on.
Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:25 Link to a recorded telephone call to Preston court this morning.
Wednesday 07.03.2012 07:15
Link to the Human Rights Review 05/03/2012 summary of 21 pages.
Link to the Human Rights Review 05/03/2012 conclusion of 8 pages.
Tuesday 06.03.2012 22:20
On the 17th November 2011 last year, my mother sent in to the court an application for immediate release based on enclosed medical reports. This was done due to reading the "direct gov website" which indicated any application sent with medical proof of capacity by its very nature would be dealt with as a fast track urgent matter! We are now 5 months down the line with still no JUSTICE.
Link to the 79 pages, of the nearly forgot about application that is now nearing half a year, for a lady approaching 72 years of age that has capacity, that is now in fear of her liberty, living in exile, with her son whom after 16 years of care, has been threatened with prison! Welcome to Britain in 2012, or could this
Link be the reason for the delay - FOR THEIR EYES ONLY!!
Link to The Justice and Security Green Paper. Designed to keep the press and public in the dark, these proposals will have serious implications for media freedom and the rights of potential victims and their families seeking answers or reparation through the courts or inquest proceedings.
Tuesday 06.03.2012 14:20
Friends Cheryl & John that have become closer than relatives share a moment in our orange grove villa with my partner James n me to discuss the purchase a commercial juicer! Some normality in a sea of human rights abuses that continue to threaten our entitlement to a normal family life.
Human rights care protection enquiry by Martin Green
Link to this video a must watch!
Human Rights Review yesterday 5th March 2012
Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:20
Human rights blogger Barrister Adam Wagner and Medical specialist.
Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:00
Human rights acts downloads.
Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:00
Human Rights review 2012
Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:00
Equality and human rights comission enquiry into the care of the elderly in their own homes and the promotion of such where the persons human rights to such count.
Tuesday 06.03.2012 08:30
Another email complaint to courts both Regional Preston Combined and Court of Protection about the deputy HUGH JONES failure to respond to emails.
Monday 05.03.2012 06:30
SNAPSHOT link to my to sisters 50th sent to the Morning Star public house. Its time to out the purpetrators of injustice!
Sunday 04.03.2012 16:30
SNAPSHOT link to my niece Danielle's facebook opinion of her own mother, my sister Angela, on her 50th birthday today. This gives an insight to the relationship of a mother and daughter whom where Angela, my mother's daughter is still trying to dictate to her own mother where and whom she should live with and also have complete disregard for the fact her own mother has got testomentorary capacity reports and where this very daughter is backing up the state and the corrupt solicitor in trying to keep her own mother in the states unlawful clutches in order to protect her own inheritance and prevent her mother gifting her own property to her son whom has cared for her 16 years. Combined with the financial discreditability I have offered upon this website about my own sister one can get a picture of the real personality.
Happy Birthday Angela! I hope your prowd of yourself. Not only does your own daughter hate and despise you, so do I, your brother! Your own mother is now taking the same views and I do believe your Grandson will also do in time!(4 generations). I today asked mine and your mother if she wished to contact you Angela on the phone but she declined, saying "No! I'll leave it for now".
Saturday 03.03.2012 10:30
Letter being drafted today with,
1. Our details (name, address and nationality).
2. The country UK against which you are making your application.
3. The facts that have given rise to your application.
4. The article or articles of the Convention that you say have been breached.
You should send your letter to:
The Registrar ,
European Court of Human Rights
Council of Europe ,
Fax: 00 33 3 88 41 27 30 -
Tel: 00 33 3 88 41 20 18
Human rights link and the protection of civil liberties.
Friday 02.03.2012 06:30
2nd WARNING EMAIL to Hugh Jones, Court of Protection & Regional Courts.
Thursday 01.03.2012 16:30
WARNING EMAIL to Hugh Jones, Court of Protection & Regional Courts.
Thursday 01.03.2012 13:30
Does this face look like the face of anxiety, a face that needs forcibly placing into care, a face that needs forcibly parting from the son that's cared for her for the last 16 years? What kind of country has the UK become to facilitate such crimes it's currently committing against families in its persuit of MONEY? Should anyone have the authority to steal off this person her property when she carries 4 doctors reports to state her capacity? What claim has anyone on her without her consent? Taken on the 25th Feb 2012 having her lunch at the Golf Club.
Thursday 01.03.2012 05:30
Families fighting for justice in the UK.
Thursday 01.03.2012 05:30
The Philosophy of Liberty VIDEO
Thursday 01.03.2012 00:30
3rd Email yet again to HUGH JONES.
Wednesday 29.02.2012 22:30
Complaint yet again to the court.
Wednesday 29.02.2012 22:30
World wide protest about UK corruption and abuses committed by the UK.
Wednesday 29.02.2012 00:30
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION we start to investigate their involvement.
Thursday 01.03.2012 00:30
Email to HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.
Tuesday 28.02.2012 12:30 WHAT IF?
The following video is not about me and my mother, its about another mother and her daughter but to all intents and purposes it might as well be about my mother and me, because the same injustices are happening to us! Welcome to ....
Sunday 26.02.2012 13:30
2nd Further Email to Hugh Jones about deliberate withheld funds.
Sunday 26.02.2012 07:30
Further Email exchanges with the court of protection about my mothers application to be released/discharged on medical grounds that rather than just being reliant on them medical grounds it has to now go before an attended hearing where all those whom are not medical can have their say as to why my mother should not be released from the court of protection without having any medical qualifications.
Reply from the court
Friday 24.02.2012 17:30
Email from my partner JAMES to Peter Jones
Friday 24.02.2012 16:30
Email from a Peter Jones whom has been reading the website for a year and whom wants to wade in with his opinion and my reply to him in RED.
Friday 24.02.2012 11:30
1st Email to Hugh Jones about withheld funds.
Thursday 23.02.2012 06:30
Email exchanges with the court of protection about my mothers application to be released/discharged on medical grounds that rather than just being reliant on them medical grounds it has to now go before an attended hearing where all those whom are not medical can have their say as to why my mother should not be released from the court of protection without having any medical qualifications. Why should my mother have to go through such sheer torture? The implication this gives out to all, is that even though one has 4 medical reports to show your capacity to make decisions upon your own life, others whom have no medical qualifications can sway or affect a judge's decision, whom also has no qualifications medically, into keeping a person trapped in this "monstrous system" where you are being robbed and plainly told, what you can and cannot do by the "dictatorship nanny state". GOD help us all when we get OLD! This state is only a
"state of protection" for the judiciary and elite backed by inheritance hungry relatives, because it certainly aint protected my mother! They obviously believe they are protecting her from me her own son, a person whom my mother trusts alot more than the entirety of them, including her own other relatives whom have tried in vain to date to force upon her what they consider to be the right things by them to do in her life. The only protection being afforded here is the protection I am offering my mother from the blood sucking leaches of relatives and state officials whom were no where to be seen in 1996 to 2001 but when the money arrived, my GOD did they appear from nowhere. As a result have done nothing for our lives but wreck it. 11 years of HELL for my mother and me. The misery endured over the 5 years prior to the award of money in 2001 has paled into insignifigance when set side by side with the suffering endured over the last 11 years. Let this be your example, on how to wreak havoc in family life and trash Article 8 of Human Rights where entitlement to a private family life does not exist in the UK.
Wednesday 22.02.2012 06:30
Statement about our current position.
Tuesday 21.02.2012 19:30
Youtube video link of Paul Drockton about HOLLIE GREIG. A serious UK SCANDAL not unlike our own.
Tuesday 21.02.2012 13:30
Youtube video link of 1 hour on the Lou Collins radio show yesterday with Brian Gerrish of UK Column talking about the imprisonment last week of Robert Green whom was trying to bring justice for Holly Greig case and also Ian Puddick who's website www.policeexpenses.co.uk was attempted to be shut down where he was exposing police corruption going right up to the top. The parting comments of these issue's is to show how our own police and corrupt state is turning more and more like a soviet based system and where I personally have commented their is likely to be at this point in time more freedoms given in Russia than there is in the current UK system that's rife with severe unjust out of control INJUSTICE.
Tuesday 21.02.2012 16:04
Cartoon chat about the OPG.
Opposing PANNONEs Guardians
Monday 20.02.2012 14:30
Youtube video of
Andrew Neil and Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming talk about super-injunctions, protecting the rich, powerful, and depraved from having their scandals becoming made public, under the pretext of privacy.
Monday 20.02.2012 12:30
Youtube video of John Hemming MP Exposing CORRUPTION in SECRET FAMILY COURTS.John Hemming MP bravely exposes the corruption in the secret family court system (and court of protection) he is the only MP to stand up to this and calls for the removal of some judges who seem to be in some kind of collusion with what is going on. He talks about bribery, and government targets and rewards.
Monday 20.02.2012 12:09
Read this, about serious injustice comitted this week, to man handing out leaflets about sexual abuse comitted by high office that needed to shut him up, and so Friday last the 17th he was sent to Prison for 1 year.
Youtube link of FREE ROBERT GREEN
Monday 20.02.2012 11:04
Read a letter written in 2010 about the abuses of the court. Has anything changed?
Friday 10.02.2012 13:04
Read an open, draft letter to Court Judge Mrs Justice Sharp and Pannone LLP.
Friday 10.02.2012 10:04
Ann's video claim of right
Exiled again .. My mother Ann speaks above in a short video about her intentions from our second home, where the first home in Blackpool has become politically unsafe to stay in, due to the onslaught of illegal, unlawful total injustices, that are being forced upon us by unscrupulous representatives of the judicial system in corrupt manners, where common law jurisdiction requested is being totally ignored & refused and ridden roughshod over by so called statute justice that was refused consent?
Watch this video!
To educate yourself about the two beings that you are, without you knowing it. The contract you and the real you. Common law and Statute law and what is real and not real only by consent, your consent. A consent taken from you on an assumption and by fear. Stand up and refuse, you can, it is your rights. We are losing them if we don't ACT!
Wednesday 01.02.2012 0738
Further collation of evidence in relation to the highly questionable solicitors conduct, Hugh Jones, was sent yesterday to the SRA solicitors regulatory authority first class.
Wednesday 01.02.2012 0638
My mother today is filing a "claim of right" alongside a video of the same.
Wednesday 01.02.2012 0002
Read an open reply/letter to Pannone and Court.
Tuesday 31.01.2012 1545
One can clearly see where all this is heading. The judiciary are conspiring to collectively deny me my common law right to a trial by a jury in which they know will provide real justice. They are heading down a road of attempting to bring a case of harrasement against me in an unlawful hearing by refusal of consent that will blacken my name to acredit those people whom are operating upon my mothers funds in a fraud by false representation and have been doing so for 11 years. In an effort to try and protect my mother attention has been drawn to this via the media and protesting alongside our common law right to issue a claim in the form of a "commercial lien" that by the "old pals act" they have concocted a hearing to then issue an injunction gagging order upon me in the hope I will break it leading to their unlawful use of "contempt of court" by an unsigned invalid Judges order! Does this not just stink of UK corruption. All the while my mothers application to be released from this whole corrupt saga has been put indefinately on HOLD! According to court of protection official "Mark Obiaguru", on speaking to Monday gone the court delay in this matter can be open ended he said, when pushed he said anything from 2 weeks to 12 months. When pushed further he said and I quote, "its tuff" and I will not put you through to a supervisor! - conversation recorded! Is it any wonder people are in exile from the UK - true!! Is it not now true that our rights to free speech are being diminished. Mums rights to a solicitor that she can pay for removed. CORRUPTION no other word for it!
Tuesday 31.01.2012 1345
Read about Judges unsigned orders.
Monday 30.01.2012 1800
Read an unsigned Judges order of no validity!
Thursday 26.01.2012 1100
Because we believe the judicial system to have evolved into a corrupt manner where our common right claims have been distorted and refused, the statement of affidavit below here was submitted to the court and it was ignored with the same contempt that is being used and threatened against us in an unlawful adminstrative hearing that is evident in the judgement now published above with the evidence there to see where no signature is displayed on that order making it invalid. It also flagrantly uses the term/threat of contempt of court where the judge knowingly or of course should do, that this is a creature of common law for common law courts and not statute hearings! Are alarm bells starting to ring because they are with me! Would'nt it be nice and convenient for the justice system to lock me up and therefore shut me up in a convenience of contempt where the threat alone was illegal to use!
Thursday 26.01.2012 1000
Read my affidavit submitted to the adminstrative hearing that was IGNORED!.
Wednesday 25.01.2012 1345
"Pannone is the obvious catastrophic choice for injury claims in the north west"
Tuesday 24.01.2012 0850 Contempt of Court is a common law offence and firstly because of its very nature by potential removal of liberty demands that it should be by way of a seperate trial that you are entitled to. Contempt of court is not a statute offence in hearings where the hearing is for as it is described for people to be heard and by its very essence is a consenting event where all parties consent and if any of those parties do not consent then it formerly becomes an "unlawful adminstrative hearing". Awareness of these issue's are becoming known more frequently and as the saying goes "we are all equal under the law" but thats only if you are aware of the law. Already in various statements I have seen, where a person is being threatened with contempt of court and this is the sort of threats, harassment and intimidation used by the legal system to put you down and keep you down. Its called a GRAND DECEPTION. It's fine for the legal system to "intimidate" and "harass" us but if they even suspect your doing that to them! We have suffered harrasment and intimidation through subtle effects for 11 years. Look at our keywords wallpaper and all these can be attributed to incidents over these 11 years. Should any up standing member of the UK have to deal with these things on day to day year by year continued exposure. Its shear unadulterated relentless mental cruelty thats draining away whats supposed to be the twilight remainder of a human beings existence.
Monday 23.01.2012 1930
Brief statement: Increasingly my mother is becoming more and more concerned for my well being and I am trying to re-assure her everything will be fine, don't worry. Its a sad country we live in when you have do such things in order to gain the attention to complaints made to all authorities without responsible resolutions being brought in an amicable fashion. The complaints we have made to, for example the SRA(Solicitors Regulatory Authority);
The SRA say this; 1. Upon taking up an investigation we do not provide you with updates! 2. We do not provide you with a conclusion. In fact the SRA provide you with a letter to state; that they are investigating, but there it stops. Now if we were to rely on this as a source for resolution how are we to know a/ whether it has ended? b/ Is it Continued? c/ has it resolved? You are simply left in the dark! Whats the point of complaining! When you complain to the OPG who may start an investigation & 7 months later, upon getting as I did a 3 line reply stating their investigation is completed and we find no wrong!! So you ask for a copy of the full investigation!
IT is denied! Now if as PANNONE LLP say these avenues are open to us. I ask, what is OPEN about that? My mother is saying tonight, Oh! Mike let's forget about it probably meaning don't bother fighting any more for her rights, leave it! We have each other! But would that be right? What about all those mothers of PANNONE Partners that they have, do they feel for their mothers as I do mine! Or are they just psychopaths, without any such feeling?
Our entitlement to a Private Family life under article 8 of the HUMAN RIGHTS treaty has been trashed over 11 years. There has been a relentless onslaught of injustices at the hands of THE COURT OF PROTECTION. This is a failed system with very serious misgivings. And now further they are trying to take away our free speech by placing an injunction inclusive of our website? What is this country turning in to? I would probably at this moment feel safer in somewhere like Russia. There is more dictatorship going on now in Britain than there probably is there. We seem to exude human rights violations whilst preaching to other country's to observe them. Hypocrites for politicians. There will be civil war in this country, I can see it. No wonder we have fringe groups as PANNONE refer to them. These people are in Lawful Rebellion and Pannone wonder why? I am a son of a mother. I have good character. My mother is not an item to be treated as in a game of "pass the parcel" as I believe would be the result if other people continue to dictate where she should live etc. We need to be left alone - those are my mothers wishes.
Monday 23.01.2012 1235 To note... Our costs today in this particular matter are approximately £20,000
Monday 23.01.2012 1225
Read our claim to "COMMON LAW JURISDICTION" and a trial by jury request being sent in to the court soon and our reasons why, where we are questioning the Judge Mrs Justice Sharp's integrity!
Monday 23.01.2012 1220 Telephone call to court whom inform me that the adjournment was granted but only for 3 days to the 26th January 2012, better get busy eh!
Monday 23.01.2012 0920
Read Adjournment Requested, acknowledged received by the recorded telephone conversation with the court at 9.20am
Friday 20.01.2012 1530
Read Hugh Jones s "scare tactic" "harassment" & "intimidation" statement of costs for their proposed temporary injunction application of £23,007 to attempt to prevent the collection of our £9 million judgement "deed of debt". I do believe that if they are successful, on a court part 20 counterclaim form, £9,000,000 minus £23,007 will leave them still owing to me and mum of £8,976,993 I wonder how they propose to settle the balance? Oh! hang on, I forgot, silly me! OUR claim stated to add all other related costs, so one can add the £23,007 to the £9,000,000 leaving a balance owing of £9,023,007. Wonderful! Nice to have "common law" on your side! LOLs The BBC have also been notified of their injunction hearing.
Thursday 19.01.2012 2359
Read Hugh Jones s statement against my mothers release application from the court and his mal administered deputyship and read my reply
Thursday 19.01.2012 1337
Read a daughters witness statement to try and keep her mother from being a free person in the face of medical evidence supporting her release and also my witness
statement in reply attached to it.
Monday 09.01.2012 1330
Response to the threat of temporary injunction order application and accompanied request to sign letter of undertaking from PANNONEs.
Sunday 08.01.2012 1600
"Financial Rape" can be the one and only term used to describe what's going on and is the reason I would rather go to prison than to see, or allow it, to continually be the manner in which PANNONEs and the OPG conduct themselves upon my mother. i.e.; When people take financial advantage of those less fortunate than themselves because they can. When solicitors quote you £1400p.a. and take £26,377 then are still sending you bills because they can, that's financial rape. Doctors charging people with Cancer, ten's of thousands of dollars for treatment because they know the patients have no other choice - that's financial rape.
Sunday 08.01.2012 1140
Peter Hofschröer a man and his mother I have come to know whom is experiencing the same problems we have with the OPG that lives in exile in Austria and whom both him and his mother would love to return to live back in England but live in fear of doing so under the corruption and extortion rackets currently going on in the UK where even MPs are not going about their business to rectify the problems paid to do so.
Sunday 08.01.2012 0840 Read about the Commercial Lien process here to educate yourself on how to put right the wrongs of others without the expense of statute courts & where all other lines of complaint have failed you as is the case with ourselves.
Saturday 07.01.2012 1200 14 Page Notice received from PANNONEs whom intend to apply for an interim injunction to prevent me recording their now defaulted upon "deed of debt" of £9 million pounds upon the land registry of each and every Pannone Partner x 50 of, houses or land, on the grounds of harassment! They claim that our claim is "invalid" and that by standing behind a Limited Liability Partnership they hold a protection afforded to them. Unfortunately what they are failing to recognise is that this became a matter of a criminal nature and as such, under common law are culpable & responsible vicariasly by the partnership condoning the criminal actions of another partner! It has always been our intentions to settle in an amicable fashion, but all they have done is harass me and my mother by their condoned criminal actions, of which proof is in my possession! Which in itself, if we reach a statute court we will issue a massive counterclaim! Additionally, under section 5a) of our commercial affidavit of truth sworn on oath and now stands as a deed of truth by failing to rebut it, states that NO JUDGE can abrogate or stand in its way or they too become criminally liable! What PANNONEs partners are now feeling is I believe, exactly what my mother has been made to feel by HUGH JONESs actions, where at her age of 71 to start to feel homeless and insecure by him considering selling her property and fraud by false representation in not allowing her to do with her property as she so HUMAN RIGHTLY deserves to do, provides untold "ANXIETY", "DISTRESS", "HARASSMENT", "INTIMIDATION" and "I.I.E.D."(intentional infliction of emotional distress) that becomes within the realm of "beyond comprehension". PANNONE partners feelings now, might be able to bear a fruit of understanding, as what it is now like, to be feeling what my own mother is feeling.
LOSS OF YOUR OWN HOME
Thursday 05.01.2012 1200 Email to PANNONE PARTNERS warning of looming
default notice expiry and the consequences that will follow. By the lack of response to the sworn on oath allegations made about Pannones LLP that they have by default legitimised our looming protest and we now invite their threat of harassment and libel charges.
Thursday 05.01.2012 1030 Others with severe unaddressed complaints.
Thursday 05.01.2012 0400
The Public/Predatory Guardians
Business Plan for 2012.
Thursday 05.01.2012 0046 Corruption in UK courts that people must become more aware of. In
an Affidavit to be read here, by
Susan Forscey Moore dated 11.09.06 she states under oath that it is her carefully considered opinion, given with all due respect, based
upon personal experience and knowledge, that English courts are not fair and
impartial tribunals where things get put right. English courts are corrupt forums based on unwarranted privilege which perversely excuse and conceal the gravest of misconduct.
Wednesday 04.01.2012 1205
/ claim served upon defendants solicitor Hugh Jones + 49 partners & Martin John Chief of Public Guardian on the 19th Dec 2011 had 14 days to respond and has now expired, therefore a Notarised
Default Notice has been sent today by receipted emails to all 51 parties and a recorded one sent to Hugh Jones and Martin John.
Wednesday 04.01.2012 1200
This is it: A Statute is a rule created by a representative governing body of a society designed to create common goals, which carries the force of law by the consent of the governed. Hold on to the thought "... by the consent of the governed", because that is a crucial thought. The long explanation can be crystalised into this definition.
Are you the Government? No. Therefore you must be 'the governed'.
A Statute only carries the force of law upon you if you consent to it. If you do not give your consent, a Statute cannot affect you in any way whatsoever.
And the courts know this. You may not, but they certainly do.
And the last thing they will do is tell you. In point of fact they will hide this from you at every opportunity.
On the other hand, if you tell them, they will accept it because they know it is actually true.
This is the Grand Deception.
Wednesday 04.01.2012 0930
Watch the Robert Menard videos
1 & 2 about free thinking &
Tuesday 03.01.2012 1230
In the case of an application by my mother to discharge the deputyship order on the grounds of now 4 supportive clinical neuropsychology reports clearly stating her capacity intact throughout her 10 years of court mismanagement of her affairs. The District Judge Batten's directions are given here along with our objections to those directions -
Read how the unlawful administrative court continues down its path of destruction even in the face of mass evidence medically that should no longer warrant any further pain and suffering to all concerned but yet they go on!
Monday 02.01.2012 0430
The LAW in Administrative (statute) terms
quote, "Halsbury’s Administrative Law 2011 which states; that administrative law is (nothing more than) an arrangement between the Executive and the Judiciary. And that the Law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country, and NO Act could be passed to legitimise them."
We are heading down a course of loggerheads with authority as we no longer have any faith in the system outside common law. We want judgements handed down under common law not statute administration in which we refuse consent to and waive any rights or benefits.
WE WANT REAL JUSTICE
WE WANT REAL PEACE.
We want RIGHTS RESTORED.
My mothers house is hers!
To do as she pleases with!
It does not belong to the state. Read Judges and their oath
Sunday 01.01.2012 1130
HAPPY NEW YEAR to all. Let this be the year to put an end to predatory guardians.
29.12.2011 To Note:
…every act by which a person causes some form of anxiety to another could be labeled as harassment. But if this is so, there can be no safe interactions between human beings. Sadly we are not perfect. All of us, on occasion, are stupid, heedless, thoughtless, and insensitive. The question then is, when are we guilty of harassment? HUGH JONES is recently claiming harrasement!! At which point might he be able to understand that the anxiety that he has caused to me and my mother over 10 years is tantamount to mamouth harrasement! If he truely wants to settle our problems then answer the serious claims made against him in a sworn "Commercial Lien" affidavit served upon him?
29.12.2011 To Note:
Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
29.12.2011 To Note;
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides the right to freedom of expression, subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society". This right includes the freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas.
Article 10 – Freedom of expression
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
This website & domain name was to be transferred to a foreign concern and is currently awaiting official transfer, its content will continue to be edited in its usual fashion. (suspended for further considerations)
Solicitors from hell website in which had previously firmly featured mums own solicitor/deputy HUGH JONES/predatory guardian which provides a service to the public that has come under threat
Recent developments in the court of protection 2011 >
Telephone call to Mum from eldest grandson & my Nephew "Jay", mums daughter Angela's son. "READ"
Exchange of christmas emails."READ"
Solicitor jailed for theft from client account under the court of protection "READ"
Amended "Commercial Lien" has been sworn in and served upon defendants Pannones HUGH JONES plus Public Guardian MARTIN JOHN and also attached as a 2nd Affidavit sent to the Court of Protection hearing to be listed soon before a Judge for mother's application to be heard to be discharged.
Phone call this morning from social services on voicemail. Have returned the call but could not reach the person concerned to find out what they want now! Follow up call to Susie to enquire
Listen. Call returned from Social Services to say they had been requested by Public Guardian to do an assessment of mums care requirements to which mum said she did not want one and got onto the phone to say so!
A Blast from the past
email@example.com Letter 2001 to Care Manager
that will show the extent of what we have had to put up with.
firstname.lastname@example.org Draft LEGISLATION
that will hopefully be extended to MP's whom are failing to respond or to act upon constituents complaints.
Read, sent to GORDON MARSDEN MP along with a copy of the "commercial lien" served upon HUGH JONES showing where common folk are resorting to old age common laws dusted down from the Magna Carta ATTIC in order to find some lawful justice in an environment of a sea of ignorance and corruption that where the only thing that talks in a statute environment is MONEY!
email@example.com Christmas under threat?
ALL because of the DICTATOR HUGH JONES lording it over us AS JUDGE, JURY AND GOD. Read. Hugh Jones
reply.. Further reply..
firstname.lastname@example.org THE COMMERCIAL LIEN
claim served upon the defendants HUGH JONES & PANNONE LLPartners + CHIEF EXECUTIVE of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN - Martin John Read PDF. Read post
email@example.com Meeting with Roger Hayes
of The British Constitution Group in Liverpool where he was introduced to mother over lunch and further discussions took place about the attempted serving of the Commercial Lien upon Pannone LLP and their advice on this and some other fronts.
firstname.lastname@example.org Further contact from the BBC
whom are currently trawling through the website before wanting to conduct an interview on our plight.
email@example.com Meeting with Hugh Jones
failed to address all the issue's needed to be addressed and upon the serving of a Commercial Lien the meeting was abruptly ended in anger by Hugh Jones and he refused to accept the serving of the Affidavit. It was some 15 minutes later when the total of 50 Affidavits were then tried to be served upon the receptionist Nicole whom said she could not accept them under instructions from Hugh Jones. Reserving by another method will take place. Hugh Jones is listed at Companies House with his adderss as these office's to accept the serving of documents! When service has been completed the Commercial Affidavit Lien will be published here with minutes of the meeting drafted to read.
firstname.lastname@example.org Letters over 16 years
are to be published to reveal the actions of "IMPUNITY" from the court of protection and deputy. Hundreds to be published! Be patient!
email@example.com Telephone Call
to my mobile from HUGH JONES offering top up funds immediately and dialogue offered with undertakings given from me not to record the conversation hereby published before GOD, to take place on Monday 5th December 2011 at 11am.
firstname.lastname@example.org URGENT EMAIL
Requesting action to avoid common law process to be applied.
email@example.com Mums hand written letter 2001
To the Judge Denzil Lush in March 2001 requesting an appeal.
29.11.2011 @14.00hr Spoke today to the BBC
A meeting has been scheduled for next week to hold a more in depth face to face interview about our plight.
29.11.2011 @11.30hr Reply from the police
with regard to lawful protesting.
28.11.2011 @19.00hr We Urge Dialogue
with PANNONEs in reference to our claim
28.11.2011 @12.00hr Request copy of reportOriginal.
from the court leaves us still in the dark
Read. See What Regulation 44 says!
Read 44?. &
27.11.2011 @08.27hr One last attempt
at trying to engage in dialogue
26.11.2011 @12.07hr Court of Protection
25.11.2011 @23.10hr Police Enquiry about Protests
sent to the Chief Constable of GMP & copied to PANNONE LLP
25.11.2011 @17.20hr Receipts for Docs served
by Recorded delivery to mums Deputy, Son and Daughter with regard to her formal application to be discharged from the court of protection due to her overwhelming 4 clinical doctors reports stating clearly that under Mental Health Capacity Rules 2005 she should not be retained under the Courts Protection
25.11.2011 @16.20hr Pannone gets a REMINDER
of the legislation of the mental health act 2005 & the
carer's Protection from Liability in the best interest of the patient where HUGH JONES is in breach of his duties in not responding to requests making him personally liable to claims for negligence & or criminal charges of fraud.
25.11.2011 @14.40hr Pannone Defamation claim to go ahead
24.11.2011 @15.13hr Pannone Defamation Reply from us
24.11.2011 @ 05.40 Freedom of Information
request for a recent court visit report that nothing has been done is met with a gagging order, yes you can have the reduced version but that you need to undertake to us that it will not be published!! Letter of authority to publish all documents has been returned from mother. Lets see what comes back next from the secret court!
24.11.2011 @ 00.21 Down's syndrome man
was locked away for ten months
23.11.2011 @ 13.40 Pannone Threatens CARER
and son of aggrieved with libel lawsuit and also an injuction - GAGGING ORDER to try and prevent further peaceful protest!
Read. We would invite the legal profession to assist with their opinion on the enclosed. Email me- firstname.lastname@example.org
23.11.2011 @ 10.40 Email to the BBC
In a request by the BBC for information.
23.11.2011 @ 03.40 Email to Pannone BOSS
Email sent to EMMA HOLT, Pannone Boss.
22.11.2011 @ 12.00 Telephone voicemail enquiry
from the BBC, for information in relation to the protest on Deansgate Manchester about PREDATORY GUARDIAN Hugh Jones, interview pending!
21.11.2011 @ 09.00 Second Campaign Protest DAY
To take place from 9am at 123 Deansgate MANCHESTER M3 2BU outside the offices of PREDATORY GUARDIANS PANNONES inparticular HUGH JONES! This man is hurting my mother in the pocket! He has begun to starve her! NOW its time to hurt him in the pocket. You take the food from my mothers mouth and we will take it from his. JOIN US whoever you are to fight these criminals.
21.11.2011 @ 04.00 Dossier of problems
not being dealt with by the OPG of HUGH JONES clients, proving the cosy consensus going on with court officials and HUGH JONES
20.11.2011 @ 19.00 I HAVE CAPACITY!!
Why am I being held a prisoner of the state when I have produced four different capacity reports from 3 different doctors. Dr Al-Hamar said I have capacity in 2001. Dr Patrick Trend said I have capacity also. Dr Donna Shelewa said in 2010 and again further improvements in 2011 November this month I hold capacity so .. why am I being imprisoned by the state.Read 31 pages
20.11.2011 @ 14.00 Public release of Application
To the Court, form COP9 and witness COP24 with exhibit 'A'& 'B' plus 3 doctors reports 2001, 2010, 2011 showing capacity!! Delivered Special D 17/11/201179 pages
18.11.2011 @ 14.00 First Campaign Protest
on Deansgate Manchester outside the offices of Pannone Solicitors went well.
18.11.2011 @ 10.00 Release of WILL intention
My mother hand writes to the JUDGE of her intention of what she wants to do with her property just about to be purchased. 11 years later it still has not been done!!!
17.11.2011 @ 23.00 History of trouble goes back to
December 2000 the "so called" incapacitated 'mother' puts pen to paper in a letter of 8 pages long to tell the preceding solicitors don't try to split me and my son. 11 years later it still carries on!!!
read. History repeating itself!!
17.11.2011 @ 09.38 3rd request
for accounts information and also an insight into our beliefs
15.11.2011 @ 9.30 Release of INFORMATION
Sent to court rep; Ruth Farrerhall a freedom of information request.
15.11.2011 @ 9.30 Release of INFORMATION A 4 page report by Dr Hana Al-Hamar 22.05.2001 that was the result of a 4hour examination stating mum has capacity!
Listen to Dr Hana's comments June 2001 verbally stating mum has capacity!
Dr Khan visited from the Lord Chancellors Office, 1 hour recording that was the overiding result to keep mum in the Court of Protection 05.09.2001
Read a 2010 report from a DR. DONNA SCHELEWA stating mum has got capacity!
Yet another report in 2011 stating mum has "still" got capacity! Read 31 pages WHAT IS GOING ON??
08.11.2011 @ 11.30 NOTICE OF INTENT
HUGH JONES of PANNONE LLP & to
MARTIN JOHN of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN. By recorded registered delivery and by email.
04.11.2011 @ 9.30am Tomorrow Saturday
5th November there is a British Constitution Group Convention in London at - Friends House
173-177 Euston Road
NW1 2BJ. In the absence of laws to protect us I would advise anyone to attend to help create the new life we all long for . . and get rid of the corrupt political system we are being repressed under, in an unconstitutional manner.
email@example.com Friday Yet another
email sent to GORDON MARSDEN MP in connection with the distinct lack of action in terms of any response from him or others?
041111@8am Friday Yet another
email sent to PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN in connection with the distinct lack of action from OPG CHIEF MARTIN JOHN, there is not a single body in connection with this whole circus where anyone in the UK can independantly address complaints that actuely will be addressed fairly, which demonstrates the collaboration of collective collusion to defraud old folk of their PROPERTY, MONEY & HUMAN RIGHTS here in the UK.
031111@8am Thursday Printers today. After yesterdays spat with HUGH JONES assistant DAVID HILTON we are today to order leaflets and banners in the name of www.opg.me "OPPOSE PREDATORY GUARDIANS" for the protest to be conducted outside solicitors PANNONE & Co offices, anyone interested in joining please contact us. We are also going to run a newspaper ad compaign to promote our cause in the London Gazette and the Manchester Evening News.
031111@8am Thursday Letter to SRA Solicitors Regulatory Authority to ask about the investigation
firstname.lastname@example.org Wednesday Letter of Authority issued to HUGH JONES at Pannones Solicitors from mother in relation to all matters in the absence of any other legal representation that where she has funds to pay for is being starved of those funds from HUGH JONES Read.
email@example.com Wednesday Email of Authority issued to HUGH JONES from mother and Mike where the words of intransigence being used by Pannones is in actual fact a perfect decription of themselves
021111@12noon Wednesday Meeting Proposed but without funding to get there and without agreement
upon mothers and mine wishes to have it recorded and to publish it
011111@8am Tuesday Video
from Lawful Rebellion's convention in STOKE on the 22nd October 2011 where this was drawn from and it shows the repressive situation in which we are living under in the UK and also what can be done about it.
011111@8am Tuesday Email to Martin John
the Chief Executive of the Office of the Public Guardian requesting an interim update on his investigation into complaints.
311011@7pm Monday Deputy Charges over 10 years amount to £115,615.74
after only just receiving more paperwork to analyse.
Read. It was in a recent recorded meeting with Hugh Jones where upon he told my mother face to face his fees had not exceeded £70,000 for the entire 10 years. Now I might be a layman but even I have eyes and ears and can add up that there is a £45,615 descrepancy! Rather alot don't you think? Now if Hugh Jones is prepared to sit face to face with my mother and lie to the tune of £45,615 can anyone else understand why we want full forensic analysis of the entire accounts to find out what other things has he hidden and omitted to inform an old lady about?
281011@5pm Friday Email sent to Hugh Jones copied to assistant
271011@9am Thursday Emails sent to Hugh Jones requesting repayment of mums solicitor expenses in trying to resolve what he is failing to resolve hiself. Read
221011@9am Saturday Stoke Kings Hall an all day convention with the British Constitution Group of Lawful Rebellion. A very interesting day where some very interesting people where met. Glad I went.
firstname.lastname@example.org Friday Contact made from Hugh Jones assistant Chris Gallagher and funds paid into account. Thank God for that! At least we can rest for the weekend!
211011@10am Friday 1st Day back in UK & Hugh Jones appears to have stopped my income all together there should have been a payment to my account showing yesterday whilst travelling that I was expecting to use but there is nothing. My bank account is overdrawn and as such is attracting charges! I have emailed him last night and awaited a telephone call but as such at the moment there is no explanation. the question one has to pose is, if a care home had their money stopped without warning where would mum be, what positon would she be in? One might ponder as to why he is doing this in an unexpected fashion. He has done all this before, it is nothing new to us. He is playing GOD with our lives. I can't provide the kind of care to mum when a man whom is behind these actions is doing just as he pleases at whim, without warning and without supervision. The OPG are supposed to supervise? It is a joke.
191011@8am Wednesday in Santander
Ship day at 9pm.
171011@8am Monday Before mum gets up we went hunting for a Mercedes dealer. Having found one some hours later the car was limped there and then had all its computors reset back to normal. Too late I'm afraid to make it to port for the boat which was therefore transferred to Wednesday. Cost 3 nights in Hotels, Merc repairs, and ship transfer costs appoximately £450.
161011@11pm Sunday Mercedes broke down 150 miles short of Madrid. Booked in nearest hotel.
121011@8pm Wednesday Thanks to Hugh Jones for forwarding some of the repatraition expenses. Due on ship tonight but could not make it due to tiredness "safety comes first " and therefore transferred the booking to Monday afternoon 4pm arrive back in Britain Tuesday evening 18th October. Hugh Jones offered a hand in negotiation when back to try to resolve other issue's offer accepted graciously. We await to see? In the meantime we are enjoying what might be a little spanish break that might be some time before getting another. Mother is fine and happy.
111011@11am Tuesday Morning No news! Emails sent to Ruth Farrer Hall of the OPG and Hugh Jones to yet again state that we are awaiting repatriation funds to book and board a ship tomorrow night with expenses explained.
101011@6pm Monday Afternoon No news! A phone call to our solicitor LESTER SAMUELS this morning at 10am whom said he would contact HUGH JONES seems also to have drawn a blank he has not telephoned with any news either, nothing all day. On the upside its been a very wonderful sunny couple of days why be miserable in the rain when you can be the same in the sun!
081011@4pm Saturday Afternoon Flying back to Spain Seemed the natural thing to do in the interest of saving our pets and preparing to repatriate our belongings in which we have awaited calls to correct matters financially and to which there has been nothing. The elctricity needs to be paid here in spain of which HUGH JONES is aware of but not sent the money. His offer of £1000 to repatriate will not repatriate us at all and this too seems to be being ignored. A voice message sent to court rep; Ruth Farrer Hall seems also to be drawing a blank. On the upside mum can afford to have a smoke here and a tipple and so we await resolutions from the PREDATORY GUARDIANS of so called COURTS OF PROTECTION/neglection.
081011@9am Saturday Morning Waking up to reality no one seemed to care that mum did not have enough money to eat smoke and drink let alone that her pets where dieing slowing in Spain because her electric had been cut off. No one also seemed to care that mum's clothes and furniture etc were all in another country that can't be repatriated because her deputy HUGH JONES the predatory guardian is looking after hiself with mum's money. Upon waking to this reality you tend to wonder what kind of country are we actually living in. The British get better treatment off the Spanish government than the British government treat there own but they do seem to have alot more respect for foreigners don't they. Perhaps thats the reality. Your better off being a foreigner in another domain as your treatment is more focused, more cared about. Today me and mum discuss how she is going to be able to continue to smoke because the cost here exceeds the money that the British government is currently providing, from I might add, "mum's own funds". We'll have to wait and see what conclusions she's going to draw. (200 cigs in Britain cost £70 - in Spain £35)(bottle of Tia Maria in Britain £22 - in Spain £12)£100 per week to live off mmmm! 200 cigs n 2 bottles of tia maria weekly oh and of course food! Transport! Pads! Clothes! Outings! Now where is Hugh Jones coming from I wonder? BLACKMAIL! 2 can play that game!
071011@2pm Outing Planned today for mum to go up to Oldham to see her substitute daughter Cheryl has now had to be cancelled. Cheryl has been more of a sister and a daughter to us than our own real sister and daughter and mum was looking forward to seeing Cheryl on a visit today. As I explained to mum that there is no money because of her deputy HUGH JONES, there is no petrol money and therefore cannot even venture out of the house!
071011@1pm Medical Requests by mother today to buy her tablets in reference to "dulcolax" which provide assistence in her ability to go to the toilet have been replied to with, "which" items do you want have less off in order to purchase these tablets, food! drink or cigarettes, as these are now currently the stark choices. Mother has not been yet repatriated because her deputy will not pay for it and so her benefit claims are not yet re applied for and therefore is not entitled to anything free from the chemist, all the while her deputy holds on to her £30,000 in order to pay his own fees!! Alarming isn't it??
071011@10am Office of PUBLIC Guardian Representative Ruth Farrer-Hall has this morning been sent a text stating as follows: "Ruth. Mike Clarke. Deputy Hugh Jones has only deposited £100 in mums account, after cigs n her tipple I have no money to feed her. The fuel tank empty light is ON! NOW IS AN EMERGENCY!! Emergency email sent to HUGH JONES
061011@11am Office of PUBLIC Guardian Representative Ruth Farrer-Hall arrives in Blackpool at the house for a 2 hour in-depth discussion on the overall and current problems experienced with the deputy Hugh Jones. We await to see what, if anything, comes of it. This recorded meeting is 2 hours and we invite you to
LISTEN to it.
041011@3pm Office of PUBLIC Guardian Representative telephones to make an urgent appointment for this Thursday 11am to formally discuss all lines of complaints raised to prepare a formal report to the COURTS.
041011@9am British Constitution Group Roger Hayes telephones me personally this morning to offer his best advice and also to meet for further discussion on additional courses of actions to be enacted upon HUGH JONES in which he believes we should follow without hesitation. Follow up meetings and discussions planned!
041011 FAST BUCK CULTURE Ed Milliband
Labour talk about eradicating the "fast buck" culture but yet in our eyes it was them that created it, via Jack Straw with the initial COURT OF PROTECTION and all the fast buck's being made, were being delivered into the hands of the elite from the pockets of the vulnerable on the pretense of protection. Such lies and hypocrisy is tantamount to treason of the vulnerable british minority of elderly and incapacitated which are easy pickings for governments when their own pockets are virtually bankrupt. They do talk some shite!
Link to Jack Straw 2009 thefts!!
Link to A woman's desperate plea to have more access to her disabled sister and whom the court of protection are providing untold agony & where at present the sister concerned is far too scared of the OPG to speak out! The bottom line for this particular case revolves I am told around a trust fund!
Link to The Constitutional Convention & how to Reassert Our Constitution.
Link to The Legal Fiction & how they control us? A very interesting artical about our constitution and the rule of law.
Link to OUR Intollerable Situation & how we can do no right. Today Sunday we were supposed to be flying back to our home in Malaga but the predatory guardian's stranglehold on mum's finances is placing us vulnerable where we could not today take the intended flights back to spain for fear of being placed in darkness and not having sufficient funds to rellocate and repatriate mums and mine family belongings. Our situation now is to be forced into the laison through 2 different solicitors and then the courts before mum can access her funds.
Link to The British Constitution Group & how they are fighting to reassert our constitution and the rule of LAW! Today me and mum paid our fees and joined this organisation as we believe our real government is corrupt and is failing in its duties.
Link to How You may find this you tube video interesting, as it outlines how the judges ignore due process in the courts in general.
Link to The Abuse of Grandma Barbara & How Corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the Elderly.
011011 22:00 Grand Theatre. Special thanks to personal friend Joe Longthorne tonight for getting down off the Grand Theatre stage in Blackpool and singing personally to mum, fantastic! What a show we recomend a visit to anyone. Special thanks also to Joe's partner Jamie and the complimentary invites from producer Tony Jo.
Link to Joe Longthorne
Link to Todays 260911 SEMINAR of 5 hours on 2011 Court of Protetion Practice, had we of had more notice we could of attended with a campaign force but there will be others. I only wish I could have been a speaker there.
When the social services called here at my mothers house the other day they said we're not just here today for your mother Mike we're here for you too! That was the first time in 10 years I'd heard anyone remotely interested in the carer! We are treated usually with contempt. If they are truely concerned then why don't they do something about the brutal treatment of the vulnerable by the predatory guardians. Chief Executive of the predatory guardians MARTIN JOHN was wrote to on countless occassions lastly on the 190911 as a reminder but 5 weeks ago he was pushed for answers and nothin but nothing has been replied to. If you were supervisor of something but did nothing! you'd be sacked surely! We are paying these people wages from our taxes as civil servants to serve the public, where are they? The last line of investigation took 7 months and all I got was a 3 line response saying all was fine! The GMP Greater Manchester Police promised to look into it but again not even a reply to advise, your just left in mid air with these things wondering if anything at all is being done, all the while the patient is now selling the shirts and dresses off their backs to pay another solicitor to fight the governments solicitor! CRAZY or what! UK4U in 2011. The legal profession get richer whilst the vulnerable become even more vulnerable.
210911 - My mother & I, have today officially employed another solicitor to fight the courts solicitor HUGH JONES & assurances have been given that no further correspondence postings will be made on this website whilst investigations and negotiations continue through the legal channels. We now hope that fair and reasonable agreements can be reached all round. In view of the current legal forces employed we are now returning for the forseeable future to live within mothers Blackpool property affectionately termed now THE GOVERNMENTS HOUSE. The days of soaking up the sun for me n mum are shelved for the time being!!
Mum wants to say something . .
CONTROL FREAKS - We have suffered over-control and slow to stop buearocrocy
for over 10 years with the predatory guardians and you know when you have just about had enough and where you decide to rebell and shout using the internet and then matters get to a level where you are prepared to give up money and property in exchange for freedom. The modern day term for this lately is known as "THE ARAB SPRING" an uprising across the middle east for change, well whats going on here is the "CLARKE SPRING". Springing into action to defend ourselves we await the visit now from Social Services brought about by collusion from my sister Angela, Brother Kevin, Lorna & John whom is my mothers blood sister with of course predator and bullet feeder HUGH JONES. Mother is absolutely beside herself that these people are trying to force her into their possession. We now attach a short video statement from her where she awaits the visit from Social Services. She was given the option to vacate to Spain and evade them but she declined by saying No I am staying to face them here in my house. Let em come she said,"we'll see".
Now, my mother had a stroke on the 29th of August, less than 3 weeks ago in which she is still recovering so why is HUGH JONES doing this to her, does he want her dead? Or do the relatives want her dead? Videos at the ready and lawsuit to follow of course. Solicitor is engaged and fees paid upfront to start the ball rolling whilst now I will set out to sell the shirt off my back to sort the predators out. We will not back down ever and I mean ever running away might be an option but my mother has said NO let's face em son! She has alot more courage than I have! And now, so must I! We will go nowhere? Let's face the theives, robbers, predators and tax evaders that are trying to destroy mum and me in the interest of INHERITANCE that never was awarded, where were these people between 1996&2001 when my sister dumped my mother at my pub and said she'll have to go into a home. For five years how much care and attention did Lorna(my mothers blood sister pay), not once did she visit or care. We lived with nothin not a dot. No visits from these! Though now .. well think about it yourself. Our new solicitor today told the social services whom wanted to come to his offices, he said no do not do that or I will have to report you, my mother felt she needed outside advice that she is not getting from HUGH JONES. Hugh Jones told her on the last recorded meeting the other week to sort her own house out knowing full well he had placed a restriction on the land registry, how can you possibly do that to someone so old 71 and have them then go out to look to do exactly what he advised them to do, then when you find out that he did not tell you the truth you have to go back and send him an email to ask for the restriction on the land registry lifted and then he does not bother even replying. He is the most despicable individual I have ever encountered that my mother has paid to date over £100,000 pounds what would you think or feel if it was your own mother.
THE GOVERNMENTS HOUSE Formerly known to us as "MY MOTHERS HOME"
in Blackpool. Take note HUGH JONES, as representative of the government and its predators we hereby enlighten you with the fact that your house is entering a phase of dillapidation. The trees to the front are overgrown and your front drive has developed excess weeds, the lawn needs mowing because that too is overgrown oh and by the way I am leaving some mouldy butter and out of date ham in the fridge but that of course is only for the estranged relatives I'm sure they'll understand that one. The TLC(tender loving care) for this property has gone! Vanished! Its not mums to do as she wishes, its yours! So I re-iterate do yourself a favour and get some gardeners in! AS we have run out of money, time patience love and TLC for something we believed mum owned but in reality does NOT!
When my brother and sister came out to spain last week I tryed to engage them both in a discussion about mums situation but both refused to get involved in any discusion. I had drafted an A4 line of 42 Questions to put before them, that would be up for a frank and honest line of discussion, for each and everyone of those questions. I was hoping to specifically shed light on what their understanding is and fully open all lines of thoughts and feelings but they seem to be uninterested point blank in any such discusion. My sister whom pointed out in a later text that her privacy is being disrespected by my publishing all aspects of this whole saga onto the web. The internet to me is one fabulous tool to use in exposing those unscrupulous individuals whom conduct things in their lives where they obviously feel the need to hide. I don't feel I have anything needed to hide. I am GAY, out and proud. I am older, but have a younger boyfriend whom I love. I am what I am and I have nothing to be afraid of and neither should anyone else. The government, thank god is now about to start transparency in courts where cameras will be allowed in to see real justice being done. If this were happening in family OPG courts corruption would fall. Its the secrecy that distroys the trust and where the devious go to work and believe me, when I say, my sister can be the most devious I have ever encounterd and so I say, there is nothing to fear about being public there is only everything to gain when you are trying to rid yourself of a sea of corruption around you by unscrupulous predators the likes of HUGH JONES whom also squirms at being recorded for the world to see him exposed for what he really is. I believe all solicitor meetings should be formally compulsory recorded, not that I currently do, only the ones I believe corrupt. Between HUGH JONES and my sister they feed off each other in order to try remove mums freedoms and ultimately spends mums money by running up huge bills on mums account by holding their secret conspiracies and collusions of financial blackmail all at my mothers expense when they are not the client! Well I know I have digressed slightly and so I am going to openly here invite my brother and sister to answer all 42 questions and reply to me which I will publish because unlike them I do not fear the transparency I embrace it!
Read all 42 questions.
190911- Note a physical phone call made direct to HUGH JONES office answering machine this morning where a message was left requesting he telephone me to explain why he has reduced monies so drastically that he is placing mums health and mine in harms way when he clearly stated on recorded meeting that these funds will be ok till January and we were left planning for those dates in mind and not now. NO reply call has been made to us.
Read a formal complaint to the Cheif Executive of the Predatory Public Guardian Martin John.
STATEMENT 190911 - I am struggling at this moment to deal with the pressures of trying to protect a mother from predators and to keep her content with what wishes she wants. I have lost completely all faith in the current UK system and also my relatives, to absolute breaking point. Because my mothers home is not being seen as her home to do as she wants with, I cannot see it as her home any longer. I feel like we would be living in a house belonging to the government. I cannot continue to care for her in a home belonging to the government. If it is my mothers home her wishes should be respected and judged accordingly by an authority and thus then acted upon hopefully in accordance with what she wants. I have fought for fifteen years to try and protect her human rights to those choices she has made over that fifteen years but livng in a property thats not hers to do with what she feels is right then my feelings are that we cannot no longer have anything more to do with the corrupt system that is not only destroying her remaining life it is also destroying me! Today I am going to take a step back, a large one, where my newly appointed solicitor will take over correspondence in this matter. We will be moving from our current residence in Malaga to a private undisclosed address abroad where privacy will be that more tight. WIth regard to the family collusion and conspiracy of financial blackmail that HUGH JONES is placing upon us by making us suffer a stranglehold on finances and thereby trying to force repatriation it unfortunately is having the opposite effect to where we will drift further from his grasp of financial controls upon us and as for my mothers money and property let the government & relatives keep it! My mother has made it very plain she will under no circumstances live with anyone else and is distressed at even the thought of it. I feel that living in a property that is sought after by the government is only placing her in harms way of being the subject of a "deprovation of liberty order" one way or another and thereby placing her into care and then ultimately the government legally can dispose of her property. Being safe and not living in fear in the UK is a thing of the past. My mother wants to reside in what she considers to be her property till death with me but safe in the knowledge that property will go where it is intended as by her own wishes. Until these wishes are formerly addressed for my mother and the threat of the removal of her property is then diminished I cannot and will not reside in it or the UK. We therefore place this statement within its current domain for all to read, wish us luck as we sail into the unknown with only 25% of the income we previously had but that to be honest they can keep that too if they wish. Mums money and house they can also keep, for all I care, but my mother I will fight to the death for because she is priceless.
10pm 180911 Texts by my brother Kevin confirms my suspicions that after their holiday at mums expense they went home to the UK and met with my mothers predatory guardian to collude on how to force their mothers repatriation by financial blackmail.
Email to HUGH JONES respect THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
Article 8 The Right to respect for private and family life
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence..
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
In our opinion mother does not need, to have, or want, a social services referral in which we consider to be an intrusion to hers and mine private family life that we believe to be in breach of our human rights.
We now invite you to withdraw your letter to reduce hers and mine levels of income whilst abroad to levels below being able to maintain a normal level of existance like to be able to eat, smoke and drink that your current drop requires an obvious rethink of huge proportions.
MOTHER WANTS TO DIE! 150911
Read a letter from HUGH JONES reducing our income, without warning, without meeting, without discussion, without answering any of our former requests/letters, from £4000 a month to £1000. If this is'nt forced financial repatriation I don't know what else it is! If mum cannot do as she wishes with her UK home she had no intention of returning to live in the UK but what choice is she now being given? Mum's weekly money reduction from her £500 allowance to £100 leaves her barely enough funds to buy her cigarettes which cost £70, her weekly tipple of tia maria and coke cost £30 how on earth one might ask can she now eat, pay towards outings put towards travel expenses such as insurance petrol etc etc the list goes on. Having told my mother of what HUGH JONES is intending to do very shortly I can only describe the look on her face was one of fear! She also could not sleep properly last night 16.09.11 and twice called out for comfort and had to be re assured that we will fight to get her wishes maintained. She also said and I quote, "I just want to die!". My income also being cut by 70% a sum of £2000 reduced by £1400 to £600 per month, in reality is actually more like 90% because of having to prop up mums lack of money to support herself. All the while, whilst we will suffer HUGH JONES will retain mums money in his bank that will cover his fees and charges that he will make on mum to defend himself against the accusations laid at his feet with regard to the SOLICITORS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, the GREATER MANCHESTER POLICE the CHIEF of the PUBLIC GUARDIANs enquiries alongside MP enquiries etc that he is having to respond to. He is protecting his own charges effectively, and thereby could not give a single damn about whether my mother has her favourite tipple or a cigarette, let alone transport to an outing, or to even eat etc. PURE and simple unadulterated GREED and theft by HUGH JONES. Nothing new for him living up to his internet reputation as PREDATORY GUARDIAN & SOLICITOR FROM HELL. Read our reply to him
Read this link page to the Justice department that describes the Office of Public Guardians jurisdiction as England and Wales whilst continuing to ruin my mothers life abroad. It also states any allegations of abuse are fully investigated and acted on. BOTH statements are lies - Not only are their powers extending to people outside the UK illegally one might presume they also do not investigate any allegations fully nor do they ACT to correct obvious failings, its all a CON or for want of a better word FRAUD of modern British political theft going on, based on client confidentiality of the vulnerable minority whom cannot speak for themselves where their relatives are treated as theives! THE RELATIVES know who the real theives are though, and we're on to you! YOU! THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT & associated Predatory Guardians!Read an email response to their 7 month investigation into my complaint that consisted of 3 lines and I was refused any further info.
Read an email to HUGH JONES expressing our current position from me and mum.
Read a letter just received by email this morning from the solicitors regulatory authority.
060911 After further attempts to have a full on discussion it appeared that brother and sister do not wish to have such discussion because they still are in dissagreement with meeting mums wishes. End of further talks now, I believe the only answer now is with a judge! Family meetings with solicitor HUGH JONES I & mum will not attend until full accounts have been provided. STALEMATE! I will now proceed with my own solicitor, Lester Samuels of ASHCROFT WHITESIDE in Blackpool. We also will not be returning to live in the UK until a resolution is forthcoming.
050911 After a brief conversation with both my brother and sister independantly today, about ongoing problems it was clear that my brother does not associate hiself too much with the internet and my sister stated she had not got the time to be concerned with mine and mums website as she had a life of her own, which is understanderable in some respects. She also stated that she was reluctant to have a discussion privately as she and all has had a very nice family holiday albeit slightly tainted by the unfortunate ill health of mother whom now appears thank god to be on the mend. I pointed out that regardless of any indifferences we should retain our dignity as siblings and if we have to, AGREE TO DISAGREE, but continue as brothers and sister without fall out.
There is tomorrow supposed to be a 3 way discussion to see if common ground can be found but my feeling is that their lack of full understanding of the problems which runs deep will prohibit any resolution. I commented, yes she had a life of her own that I fully understand but that I have NOT! for a period of 15 years leaving a bitterness. Briefly yesterday my sister suggested that possibly, mums home be put into 3 way joint names mine hers and my brother and that I had an option live there until death. This failed to recognise mums wishes and nor does it compensate me either and neither I believe would it satisfy Hugh Jones or the court.At this point I raised the fact that no money was awarded to pay for inheritance that it was awarded to pay for carers! I have explained that potentially at this moment Hugh Jones's angle seems to be the sale of the UK property to raise funds to pay future bills and living standards to which mum and I are non too happy about. In reality at the moment their is no secure home to go to and me and mum have doubts about returning to the UK at all. I further explained that due to a lack of accounts it appears to us of a back calculation that a large amount of money is missing alongside the mal administration of funds by Hugh JONES in regard to the living off the exchange rate during emigration amounting to losses exceeding €100,000. These problems are intermingled with accusations of discrimination levelled against HUGH JONES where me being a GAY relative carer having been unpaid from the private damages as a gay relative carer over the 10 year period and as a result suffered from not be able to gain a mortgage of my own or at times even a bank account therefore after all done for my mother rendering me homeless and penniless. The system seems to take into account that private carers can demand £12 per hour and that the solicitor HUGH JONES can command £300 per hour but the relative carer gets ABUSED, with, excuse my language, FUCK ALL! Mother being mother, the so called incapacitated and the one that seems to be most level headed of the lot seems to be able to recognise from donkeys years ago that in her belief and wishes that her home should be left to me in JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY where by agreement between us she can then follow through with her desire for us both to go back and live in that property till her death, safe in the knowledge that she has left her property to the son that has given up everything to put her first for the last 15 years and possibly the next five or ten, without any personal gain until her death. WHO ARE THE INCAPACITATED here!!
050911 Regardless of family indifferences with regard to what wishes of mum should or should not be met we retain the dignity of being brothers and sister. Kevin Angie & Mike. Taken at "the family" Las Lomas Villa.
050911 For LOVE or MONEY? If the council/court can force an elderly person to sell there home to pay for care then is it not a fact that a relative carer can also reflect the same views where that property will then remain in the family domain. Read a report where growing numbers of families are compensating relatives who serve as caregivers to elders. But to avoid exacerbating tensions, it is important to disclose such arrangements to the entire family.
Read Another related link
Read Another related link
Read Another related link
030911 10:43 Mum is doing absolutely tons better today. She got herself out of bed leapt on to her new zimmer frame, sped out to the lounge and on to the patio for some morning sun. GOD what a trouper. Amazing. Now she is on a morning aspirin for the rest of her days.
310811 09:43 Mum has survived the stroke to date but there are some problems that I am having to deal with.
She is struggling more so now to walk.
She is also more seriously struggling to swallow.
Her speech is also affected more laboured.
On the plus side
They did allow me to take care of her at home so she is back at the villa.
Sister Angela has arrived and my brother Kevin is flying out as I write.
It was very touch n go yesterday we believed at one point she was about to die, seriously, but then she seemed to perk up, I hope its looking that more favourable today.
Though this morning I caught her she had just got out of bed herself and was walking with her zimmer as I got to her bedroom she is such a trooper.
I had to feed her this morning.
Its a slow uphill learning process but on we go.
Thanks awfully for your concern .
Mike ANN James
290811 14:00 Mother was admitted to Marbella hospital (Los Monteros) today with a suspected stroke. Please pray!
Son sue's the mother he cares for! - Unfortunately, things are unhappily going down a road that I did not want to go down and that is the one, of sueing my own mother, fortunately my mother said "get on with it Mike" I've got no problem with it, as you know.
Read mums request to HUGH JONES to advise of this years current bill charges to date and also to remove his restriction on her title deeds to her house so as to complete alterations to her Title deeds as he told her she could do with any solicitor in the recent face to face meeting.
240811 Greater transparency within Court of Protection
Responsible department: Ministry of Justice
Where solicitors are appointed by the Court of Protection to act as deputies for mentally incapacitated clients, relatives should be given sight of their bills, charges, narrative etc., if requested. At present relatives are not allowed to see a bill until after the client has died (due to client confidentiality). They can only apply to see it if they are an Executor/beneficiary with a financial interest in the bill, and only then if they have good reason to challenge it. This present state of affairs means that solicitor/deputies who overcharge or financially abuse their vulnerable clients cannot be held to account until after the client has died - too late to be of any benefit to the client himself. In the interests of transparency and in order to counter the possibility of fraud, all bills should be available for scrutiny by relatives of vulnerable clients. Please sign this e-petition
230811-HUGH JONES charges only just released to mum(18/8/2011) in reverse order for the last 5 years 2006-2011, 2010-11 £15,000 2009-10 £10,500 2008-9 £8,000 2007-8 £5,400 2006-7 £4,300
still awaiting the prior five years 2001-2006 and
read HUGH JONESs own projection of those years in this document he gave mum in MAY 2003. Is it any wonder he's been hiding things from my mum and refusing to supply information on request! Note at the bottom of this document where he states what the courts own prediction of expenses not to exceed £25,000 for the entire 10 years and just above that where HUGH JONES states he has had already taken £40,000 plus his prediction of £60,000 to follow that is currently exceeding his prediction by 300% and as yet we are still are unaware of the actual full figure he has taken from mum! So, hang on, lets do a short summary of what we think we can arrive at
£40,000 prior to 2003
£18,000 assumed predicted? 2003/4+2004/5+2005/6 awaiting, well according to my 'O' level mathematics mind that's a grand total of
£103,000 in charges that he stated on the recorded mp3 meeting did not exceed £70,000. Mmmm seems to me to be some lies there! Does there to everyone else?
Now to me, liars & theives & some politicians, tend to fall into the same bucket, so surely one can understand that it's easy to believe some SOLICTORS are in it too! Now the above are just the reasons we want forensic analysis of the absolute FULL accounts because to my reckoning the original award of £775,000 plus interest and other payments comes to around £1.1 million pound but it seems to me that the interest is missing!
Read a complaint of suspected fraud to Greater Manchester Police CHIEF Peter Fahy & Read his reply.
Read a CHIEF EXECUTIVEs very informative response & of course as ever my reply
Read a formal request sent today to HUGH JONES for a detailed bill of costs for assessment request for each and every cost certificate over 10 years.
Read a formal request sent today to HUGH JONES for a fast track application to be made in relation to her property.
Read a formal request sent today to Pannones for a fast track application to be made in relation to her property.
Read a formal complaint sent today to the Parliamentary Health and Service Ombudsman about the poor handling of complaints by the Chief Executive of PREDATORY GUARDIANS - Martin John.
Read a reply that took 13 days from the Chief Executive of the Predatory Guardians whom states that he will respond within 10! Yes occassionally he might but when he fails to answer your questions fully and thus you write back WARs are being WON and REGIMEs are falling, in the meantime MARTIN JOHN still has not answered your question :-
***Read my reply***
170811 Well mother is in for a shock tomorrow for her surprise gift for this week s 71st birthday am taking her to a close up and personal small but select little private concert of the one and only "TOM JONES" in Marbella, her idol for over 40 years just hope I can get Tom to have his photo with her, she will be shocked as she knows nothing about it! Mum had a ticket to see him 35 years ago which she sold to buy me a coat, payback time tomorrow!
160811 - In the complaint to Chief Executive Martin John earlier 130811, I refer to a "cosy consensus" going on where there are quarterly meetings that take place in court user groups such as ie; HUGH JONES meets Judge DENZIL LUSH to discuss matters, would it not make sense to include the families that they are discussing. Read 2009 report & Read 2010 report.
The Definition of cronyism: Springs to mind where the act of showing partiality to one's close friends, typically by appointing them to a position in a company or organization
150811 - Facebook comment from Colin Berry -
Corruption in our legal system and no one cares. Wake up people let's create a new world of decent human beings who do care.
Read an email message of support from Margaret.
2nd copy email sent to Chief Executive of PREDATORY GUARDIANS in case he did not receive the first one, now 2 weeks old, that in actual fact still failed to answer other emails/letters going back to the 2nd June and also January giving clear indication of how the PREDATORY GUARDIANS boss, will without doubt obstruct/delay and not answer all your questions fully, especially the one's he dare not answer, well, with the truth anyway.
140811 Court of Protection cost me £50,000
Link to the article from 27th July 2010
140811- Complaint has been drafted and sent to MP GORDON MARSDEN with a mp3 copy of the meeting between me my mother and the deputy.
140811- Complaint has been drafted and sent to the
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice 2010 - MP CRISPIN BLUNT.
140811- Complaint has been drafted and sent to the "SRA" red alert section of, SOLICITORS REGULATORY AUTHORITY.
Email to the CHIEF Executive of the PREDATORY GUARDIANS asking to refer recent matters to the ombudsman in what can only be considered as his role in "mal administration" with the "cosy consensus relationship" between the deputy Hugh Jones and the Office of the PREDATORY GUARDIAN.
Letter from mother to HUGH JONES demanding the release of charges certificates and accounts documents in full so as to be forensically accounted.
110811- Complaints have been formally issued today to the Greater Manchester Police & to The Legal Ombudsman of Solicitors in connection with the refusal and obstruction to providing accounts to cover the 10 year period of receivership by HUGH JONES.
110811- I make a statement as self appointed Best Interests Advocate of my mother here today in connection with her wishes. She finds it unbelieveable that she is having to fight for the right to have her wishes met and that Predatory Guardian HUGH JONES is still wanting to plunder her assets to fill his own pockets. She today wants to express that if she cannot fulfil her wishes to remain in her own home till death and it being transferred as requested into JOINT Beneficial tenents in equity with her son then she will not reside within her home country the UK, under the current regime.
080811 Daily Mail reports 3 out 4 britons don't trust care homes! ditto??
080811 - We are currently considering organising a protest outside the Offices of predatory guardian HUGH JONES of Pannone & Co Deansgate Manchester and anyone interested in supporting our cause would be made exceptionally welcome please contact us in connection with this at the email email@example.com or telephone to 07523287267 and speak directly to Mike.
BEST INTEREST ADVOCATE
Note ‘Best interests’ advocacy is where an advocate represents what he or she feels a person’s wishes would be, if they were able to express them. ‘Best interests’ work is not generally appropriate in mental health advocacy where people are well able to express their needs and opinions directly. Some mental health advocates working with older adults are trained to do ‘best interests’ work with those clients with dementia who are no longer able to communicate clearly. A specific example of ‘best interests’ advocacy is provided by Independent Mental Capacity Advocates (IMCAs) under the Mental Capacity Act 2005
060811 Saturday 5pm till midnight a party was organised and executed by Sister Angela at her new farmhouse in Milnrow with all family and friends invited to celebrate mums 71st birthday in a karaoke barbeque buffet style with music. What a success mum loved it.
Email from the CHIEF Executive of the PREDATORY GUARDIANS and my reply
Case of interest video link. Labour MP Kevin Brennan used a short Westminster Hall debate on 19 July 2011 to highlight concerns over the functioning of the Public Guardianship Office.
This is absolutely typical of the Public Guardians lack of proper governance of its deputies and failures of its duties to enforce its supervisory role.
250711 Forensic Accountants have been written to today to seek there involvement into an indepth look at where my mothers funds have been squandered and plundered to assertain a more accurate assessment of losses incurred that can legally be aportioned to the blame of financial abuse of my mothers award by solicitors PANNONE & Co backed by the Office of the Predatory Guardians.
200711 Transparency & Accountability seems to be the key words coming from the commons debate today I wonder when the Office of the Predatory Guardians might take a leaf out of this new found honesty and responsibility to the families decimated by the actions of the corrupt in the OPG.
180711 meeting that I was going to report in writing but its too long to write about you need to listen click here.
180711 Office of the Predatory Guardians & Me will report in more detail very shortly about the 1 hour meeting today with Predatory Guardian, HUGH JONES and his delaying tactics to obstruct mums wishes as long as possible in order to eventually forcibly sell her property against her wishes to support his own vision for her future, not of her making, acting as Judge & Jury in his own self made world.
150711 Flying this morning from Malaga to Blackpool UK to update ourselves with UK correspondence as we have heard nothing from MP John Hemming, MP Kenneth Clarke & official complaints to the Office of the Public Guardian about mums deputy receiver Hugh Jones and after our meeting now scheduled for Monday 18th if things don't seem to be moving in the correct direction it will be time for more radical moves to come into play, watch this space.
Read an email
about CoP victims plans to camp outside parliament on Monday 18th coming.140711
Meeting with HUGH JONES confirmed for 2pm Monday 18th July 2011.
Read an email
to Hugh Jones confirming our presence in Manchester tomorrow and for the next few days should he wish to discuss matters to which he refused on our last visit to the UK. 140711
Read an occupation license sent by the spanish solictor in connection with the villa/bungalow swap.130711
Read an email
about CoP victims plans to camp outside parliament next week.130711
Read an email to HUGH JONES 130711 regarding the bungalow/villa exchange for a place we have previously lived in that mum wants, failing the UK request she made 3 months ago to place her bungalow into JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY with her son.
After a facebook friend request to my sister on 22.3.11 was made "Family -
Regardless of our conflicts over mum I want to re-iterate the offer made at the end of last year and that you and all other family members are still welcome to come and stay at the villa at any point. We have had serious differences I know, but it will not alter the fact that you are my sister and as such I will not be the one to sever the connection for ever. I am quite prepared to be your brother and relate accordingly, should you decide to visit, I only ask the same in return.
As such, this is a friend request." A new request sent yesterday was accepted and communication is flowing in a family fashion once more.120711
Read a reply to the office of KENNETH CLARKE Secretary Of State for JUSTICE @ 22:49 08/07/2011.
Read an email response from the office of KENNETH CLARKE Secretary Of State for JUSTICE. arrived 080711@1700
Read a consultation paper out now to comment on. 300611
29th June 2011 Statement
Video No 2 coming
½ MILLION POUND robbery from OAP
In this short video I want to point out the frustration felt not only by me but also by thousands of people whom are experiencing the same problems with the OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN, in particular its deputies. No one and I mean no one seems to want to be accountable. There seems to be a distinct lack of facility for processes to make and force accountability and transparency. WHY is that?
When you make a complaint there seems to be no acknowledgement. You are left wondering if your complaint arrived, for weeks or months. There is no transparency, things are said agreed and judged on without any formal explanation about what’s been said or done. You ask for information and are quoted NO under data protection. You then quote FREEDOM of information act and again nothing is released you are just sent around in circles, pillar to post, hoping you’ll become tired and frustrated.
Whilst my mum’s deputy has robbed my mother of an estimated £250,000 no one is apparently accountable and whilst that takes place, in order to facilitate more funds for himself he attempts to sell her property for £100,000 less than its market value.
To add to the above we do not live under UK jurisdiction and formally reside in Spain where these laws don’t apply and where we are forced to live from an exchange rate that has depleted in three years by 33%, meaning a loss to mums cash in excess of £100,000.
So, the total losses in connection with the forcible control of the British governments Office of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN, amount to,
£250,000 in fees
£100,000 in under value sale of property
£100,000 in exchange rate losses by emigrating but not moving funds into the currency of the country of residence.
Whilst these thefts continue the Office for the PUBLIC GUARDIAN’s Chief executive MARTIN JOHN state’s and I quote, “as always, you are at liberty to seek legal advice”! Whilst he is in the full knowledge that not only do you not have the funds to do so, one also lives in a country where there is a language barrier.
Is it not a fact, that the system is using the fact, that MONEY will prevent anyone being held to account for what amounts to no more than THEFT from OLD FOLK, which I might add, has been legalised by the British Government.
Having written to the JUSTICE secretary KENNETH CLARKE and got no response.
Someone, somewhere will eventually become so disillusioned, they will take up arms and seek revenge or should I say, JUSTICE.
In writing to the POLICE this week I expect no response as these are above the LAW!
Would you want JUSTICE if your mother was robbed of nearly ½ a million pound?
Does someone from the British Government or connected to, have to DIE, before someone will sit up, take notice, and STOP this absurd situation from continuing further.
Read a request for some serious formal replies soon or we intend to write formal complaints to the Greater Manchester Police.
If someone else took 1/4 of a million pounds off your mother, you'd want to know why? You'd ring the police! So if you can get answers for that, why can you not get answers if the British Governments deputies, have had it? And furthermore if it's been proved that MP's cannot be trusted where their own fake expenses charges are submitted to the taxpayer, then why are the Deputies of the Court being trusted with their charges? Why is their no outside accountability and transparency to the family? Whats the BIG SECRET, or are we just to draw the conclusion of legalised UK government THEFT!
240611 As per usual there is a distinct lack of responses from Hugh Jones or his assistants on several questions recently asked he only chooses on which questions to answer that suits him the obvious one s which are to awkward to answer he just chooses to ignore. Whilst my mother ponders where she might be living in 6 months Hugh Jones just sits around with ignorance to her plight and mine. Who does one speak to, my mother and I have already complained to the court but have received no response. Pannone and partners income tops nearly 1 million pound per week for this treatment without any transparency without any recourse or proper government structure to complain. How is it possible in 2011 in the UK, concerning people who don't reside in the UK but yet are controlled by the UK and financially forcibly tied to pound sterling not of their choosing suffering cash sum devaluations at the hands of exchange rates and also suffering money missing from balances without any proper full explanation to any of it!
Read a request to know what the deputy has charged my mother over 10 years as we only were told the first years charges. The other 9 years have been kept secret but we suspect the charges have exceeded a quarter of a million pound. £250,000 is missing from mums balance of cash funds and we would like to know where it has gone.
Read a reply from me and mum about her gift application.
Read a reply from HUGH JONES about providing a letter of employment in order to facillitate a mortgage application.
Read a blogspot on comments of up to date complaints 200611 by ANNA RACCOON
Read a request for employment confirmation from my mother funds via her deputy to aid & seek a mortgage application. Recently I had difficulty in obtaining a bank account by not being ble to prove employment and so as to demonstrate my employment I seek strict proof to be put in place and if this cannot be done it also surely demonstrates how the "relative carer" can be left homeless through no fault of their own, just pure reckless discrimination & inequality on the part of the Deputy whom is placed there by the British Government to protect the patients wishes and concerns of her best interests where currently, clearly he appears to be suffering pure ignorance to.
140611 A photo of me n mum at last night s dinner party held at friend George Lees's villa in Fuengirola Spain where the wine food & company where nothing short of
Read a reply dated 130611 from Mike n ANN to deputy HUGH JONES regarding our transport problems regarding repairs that to date Hugh Jones has refused to pay for but today he offers 50% leaving us penniless.
Read an email dated 130611 from deputy HUGH JONES regarding our transport problems regarding repairs that to date Hugh Jones has refused to pay for but here he offers 50%.
Read an email dated 120611 from mike to deputy HUGH JONES regarding our transport problems regarding repairs that to date Hugh Jones has refused to pay for.
090611 A copy of the letter sent to Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke has been sent to Court reformer MP John Hemming and to ask for his involvement.
UK Valuation of house Read a valuation by Blackpool estate agents OYSTENS of mums UK property thats mums deputy was trying to discharge quickly for nearly £100,000 less than this figure that has now been removed off the market by mum.
08.06.2011 Mother on a night out in the BONANZA CLUB to see the one and only famous TV comedian that was banned from UKTV after talking about the "german fockers" on the Des O Conner show, STAN BOARDMAN.
070611 Read an email to HUGH JONES & ASSISTANT Chris Gallagher
Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP . Read a letter to The Secretary of State for JUSTICE though there are some people who think he will not even reply or take any interest, well we'll see.
23.02.2011 Read a reply from Chief Executive of The Public Guardian, Martin John.
15.02.2011 Read A reply letter to the Chief Executive of The Public Guardian, Martin John.
14.02.2011 Read A hughjones charges2003 document forcast. His document stating his charges over 10 years and a 3% per annum increase never paid to us but on his first year a 1000% increase to his self!
14.02.2011 Read expenses breakdown2003 suposedly to be increased annually 3% but hey what happened, nothin! for seven long years.
18.01.11 A copy of both pdf docs listed below have been forwarded to the HOME OFFICE INFORMATION ACCESS TEAM.
17.01.2011 Read An email to the OPG M Sullivan in response to her letter before this one below.
16.01.2011 Read A letter from the OPG a M Sullivan in response to a complaint to the Minister of Justice.
14.01.2011 An enquiry sent to community legal advice - I believe I should of been paid a wage from my mothers damages award to care for her but was told to claim benefits as I was a relative but other carers were paid from her damages at £12 an hour. I believe I have suffered discrimination and inequality breaching my human rights over a 10 year period.
13.01.2011 Meet your author, Michael on you tube, he is fuming!
12.01.2011 Read An email to the secretary to the department of Works and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith.
12.01.2011 ADVICE RECEIVED - The way forward is to collate your evidence and write to the 'Minister of Justice' also the Human Rights Council in Geneva and say your human rights have been violated. There are thousands of innocent people in prison - but I hate to think how many thou...sands have been stiched up because they own a home and were the target to pay a greedy dishonest lawyers fees!
11.01.2011 Read An email to the Secretary of state for works and pensions via MEP Brian Simpson
10.01.2011 Read A letter to 8 Members of European Parliament
11.01.2011 Read an email to the Equalities and human rights about a one month old question unanswered.
221210 Read OPG legal reply on the subject of The Freedom of Information Act request for them to release a full anonymised copy of their 7 month long investigation that was first turned down by quoting section 40 of the data protection act and now turned down with new reasons here.
221210 Read The CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT report just been delivered that needed to be sought in view of the "witch hunt" now being conducted by those unscupulous individuals that are making mums life a misery, whom cannot respect her wishes and rights to unrestricted life style choices that are blatantly obviously in her best interests.(cost £1400)
301110 Read A complaint of "financial abuse" that has been submitted to the Public Guardian, The Adjudicators of the OPG at Haymarket, London, Rt Hon David Cameron, Gordon Marsden MP.
301110 Today I finally consulted with a solicitor for 30 minutes in the start to claim what I believe to be long overdue. The experience was very satisfying just to hold their attention and listen. This may be one of the problems of the secret court of neglection, there is no outlet, no where to go and vent frustrations in the system no real one to one contacts.
281110 Mums personal disability telephone went live and a text was sent to daughter Angela to confirm it was mums personal phone not touched by mike and james thus she in turn sent mum a reply to confirm. She was asked to pass the number to other relatives and since, there has been no phone calls yet UNTIL 131210 Angie.
251110 Read A recent email from myself to mums deputy to which no reply has ever been received!
160910 This website was suspended for a period of 10 weeks from 160910 due to some shocking trouble with family that took the form of several things including statements and texts all to be published here over the next few days. I needed time to digest the content and come to terms with it before restarting the website in which, after consultations with the receiver, I was not going to do. Unfortunately his recent actions (251110) have left me no option. What appeared to be a witch hunt from the family of welfare accusations the receiver appears to be now seeking financial ones. Their conspiring to create some sort of action in which they can then deprive mum of her liberty.
080910 1319 Request for copy of full investigation under the freedom of information act is now referred to the courts legal advisor whom will contact us shortly.
080910 1319 Spoke by telephone to Neil in the court of protection overseas number +44300 456 4600 to ask for a copy of the full deputyship order issued to HUGH JONES he will ring me back after speaking to ANNA CHACHULAC
080910 clarke to opg.eml request under the freedom of information act for a copy of the full investigation and also a copy of the deputy's order/ full remit.
070910 1500 phone call from HUGH JONES lasted 45 minutes some agreement reached but there had been some meeting or collusion with sister Angela and brother Kevin to suggest that inadaquate care was being provided by me to which I find typical from those whom are only interested in one thing. There again, is now speculation about what I spend the monthly income on and so our expenses are now being documented on the right for the world to see! Ludicrous I know but when your in our shoes you are expected to jump through hoops! Its basically called "covering your back" when there are knives in it!
This money that was awarded to mum for care has truely turned some of my family into an unscrupulous backstabbing twisted bunch whom have absolutely no appreciation for the unpaid care thats been given to mum over fifteen years. Doctors swore mum would never walk again let alone last ten years when we are on fifteen years and she was taught to walk again for 13 of them. Ya can't pick ya family can ya.
NOTE: Hugh Jones now wants to have a meeting with the family about where mum should live again after mum has told them repeatedly she wants to stay here with me in spain and the last time we had to have a meeting it cost us £375out of our household income money which HUGH JONES would not refund and todays request for moving house fund was met with a shortfall of 300€ from the deposit I paid which he is not refunding, WHY? Equally we have no transport to move our furnishings so as yet dunno how thats gonna happen let alone find money for flights to take us to the UK and back here again! For a meeting to run up HUGH JONESs bills about where mum should live when she can clearly tell him on the phone she don't want to live in the UK! The last time this happened a care rota was offered to relatives in 2001 so we could live in Oldham but not one of them offered to fulfill it. And now HUGH JONES wants to resurrect this when clearly mum has no intentions of living in the UK. I sometimes wonder if we should claim asylum in Spain and be protected from the constraints and repression of the deputy's of the BRITISH GOVERNMENT. Sounds ridiculous doesn't it, but try living in our shoes. Mum is actually becoming concerned for her own freedom now like I am, as to whether the relatives are concocting some sort of plan to make mum stay in the UK. We are becoming worried about even a visit to the UK, what does that tell you.
070910 1300 emailed - left message
070910 1120am telephone call to Hugh s secratery Margaret left message
070910 0915am telephone call to Hugh s office voicemail left message
070910 0910am telephone call to Hugh s mobile messages left message
060910 5.15pm telephone call to pannones office spoke to Hugh s secratary margaret whom said Hugh had gone home!
060910 4.20pm Telephone call again to HUGH Jones mobile messages asking him to ring
060910 11.50am Telephone call made to pannones HUGH JONES mobile message left for him to contact me.
030910 23:18 email sent to Pannones asking to resolve our problems by telephone on Monday 060910.
070510 telephone call to estate agents This telephone call is just a typical manner in which things are done! This came as shock and made my adrenaline run, I was literally shaking after this call was made. Would'nt it be very easy to make a corrupt sale of a property without the owner's or family's permission, all in favour financially of the people agreeing to its disposal. This is the kind of corruption these people under the court of neglection lay potential victim to. This property was originally valued by this agent in writing at £350,000 and now there is talk of selling to an unknown cash bidder for £220,000. Work it out yourself!
060510 clarke to NEW priminister 060510 clarke to web reader rob
090410 Appointment to see Marbella solicitor over recent concerns and issue's.
090410 email pannone to clarke.Missing £1320. The account that this money was paid to had been closed for 2 years and Mr Hugh Jones had the gall to accuse me of miss managing money.
060410 email pannone to clarke. Though we have accepted this 50% offer toward our travel expenses as satisfactory its only because I have been brainwashed to some degree by Mr Jones's approach where everything is done like bidding in an auction, instead of accepting that the amount requested is the actual amount he barters with you for the best price as though you personally have some additional funds somewhere to fill the gap. If the shoe was on the other foot would he barter at a 50% loss for his own expenses toward the meeting, I doubt it. This meeting as presented here cost us £375 out of household expenses, note. Let alone the overall charges in total that effectively are charged in secret, to mums estate, not made public to even a relative.
020410 compromised agreement reached Yet again this shows that from a clear request for up to date expenses Mr Hugh Jones thinks it best to barter you down from 6000 euro to 4400 euro whereby your only option is to trim the care offered to the patient in order to survive.
010410 notes of the meeting Lasting some one and a quarter hours it started with Mr Jones s statement that he had no intention of increasing householdexpenses and care costs.
112003inflationlinked Pannone doc2003 from this document prepared by Hugh Jones in 2003 you will clearly see 2 things, a/ that he shows his own moderate charges not to exceed £25,000 in ten years when they exceeded that in the first year b/ that his proposal for household expenses was to be increased annually by 3% but in fact he never once put them up by 1 solitary penny over 7 years to 2010 and this was in the face of complaints over those years.
090310 email exchange Various.
100210 OPG to Clarke Opg to investigate complaints made.
260110 Clarke to MP Complaints unresolved.
Mp3 recorded meeting of 1HOUR 18.07.11 that clearly shows the start of the process to steal my mothers home
06.10.11 OPG Rep: Meeting Recorded - LISTEN to it.(2HRS)
This is the website of an OPG patient
and her son - carer.
A few words about us, our website and its slogan "He who cares, wins!"
In June 1995 my mother Ann was 55 - After a long period of depression tried to end her life but tragically it ended her as we knew her & she only awoke from her coma 11 months later to find her new existance as a disabled woman needing 24hr care.
Mike was from a Entreprenaur backround of Nightclubs Pubs, Tourism and Hotel life suddenly found himself to be that very carer at the age of 37.
After the obvious glaring failures committed by the ROYAL OLDHAM HOSPITAL a lawsuit case against them was launched in 1995 and some 6 years later in 2001 a compromised out of court settlement of damages was awarded in excess of £775,000. Mum, after 11months in hospital was discharged to a nursing home but the pain to the family of seeing her in there of only a few weeks brought about the decision to care for her at our own homes initially shared for a short period by my sister and I. In 1997 I took on the roll of full time carer and have done so to date, a period of 16 years.
The Website History -
This site has been launched because we emigrated permanent(March 2008) but find that mums estate is still trapped in the UK and as such our security back up when things are not right, of referring to our MP will be removed and thus our spanish option leaves us with a language barrior problem. Therefore we decided to place the correspondence in the public domain to be judged by all. These link files to the left in column 1 are being documented in reverse order from whatever is todays date, in other words the latest current documents are on the top of the list and because the launch date of this site was only the 3rd April 2010 more and more information will be added over time as its our intention to expose the fundamental misgivings of the original intentions of the COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Anyone can see clearly if pouring over these documents an understanding of the where the name change came from with reference to NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION. We hope this website can also help others whom have serious problems with the OPG and its affiliated deputy's. Its my personal experience in many cases that money is horded away from the patient only to serve as inheritance to relatives whom played little or no role in the care of the affected patient ensuring the best possible existance to the end of their days. My own mother's award was predicted to have only lasted 10 years and her award was based on that prediction and its a testament to good care that her life expectancy is exceeding this prediction by far but that it would not do if constricted by the narrow brush approach of deputies hording vast sums of money away only to protect their long term fees and charges which are vastly in excess usually of what was supposed to have been laid down guidelines from the OPG.
We spent 6 years fighting a court case to get the award and then only to spend then next 10 years fighting the receiver to get it off him. Our lives are permanently blighted by the ongoing struggle in which the original award was supposed to solve. We cannot understand how, in 2010, a little known about corrupt UK government body can continue doing what they do in an unaccountable secret fashion, with lack of transparency and openness that the Cameron/Clegg government is currently promoting.
Though there is today (110410) still alot to resolve we do have a level of life to enjoy where we now live, in the Costa Del Sol, never to return again to the corrupt country from where we were born, THE UK unless of course its by the intimidatory way they are handling our finances and effectively continually trying to blackmail us into returning to the UK.
A testament to good care mum is still going strong at 70 years of age recently on the 9th August 2010 taken during a birthday meal in Benalmedina, Spain.
SOME OF THE FAMILY HISTORY
Born in Middleton, Manchester in 1940 the eldest one of seven mum fast grew up having to learn the rigors of life & at the age 16 she found love married and moved in with her new husband a journey the would last 36 years.
Mum never knew her real father he was missing at war presumed dead, when at the end of the war he returned only to find my mums mum, Grandma pregnant with another mans child whom then decided to leave. Mums real father also left and never returned, he went on to become a Director on the board of British Aerospace a person whom never came to see, find or even acknowledge his own 2 daughters.
With three children and now alone my mums mum, Grandma eventually found another love whom fathered a further four more children with her. My mother being the eldest of seven was very soon helping at an early tender age to look after and bring up her siblings virtually as an additional mother to them
After marriage at 16 mum at 19 gave birth to me, 3 years later my sister and one year later my brother. Our family was VERY close. My sister and I bonded more and more over time. I remember all going out at night to our local for evenings all as one close family for many happy times. When I reached 16 I knew I was Gay I confided in my sister, mother and father but chose to pacify them all by saying I was bisexual and dating girls until the age of 26. For ten whole years I struggled to accept that I was never really bisexual at all and the pain that brought resulted in relentless up and down depressive symptoms, which on reflection were burdened on to my mother. She carried them times for me very much where suicide was a frequent consideration and she helped me thro to better times. This was a debt to my mother for which it became easier to repay when she needed me after her life changing accident in 1995.
At the age of 26 I suddenly became concious of the fact that I am what I am and that was the end of my relationships with women that tormented me from being the person I really was. From this point on depression for me became a thing of the past and I personally believe it was my mother whom helped carry me thro that ten year period in my life.
Our upbringing was of a working class family background on predominantly a council estate but that my father thro his business ideas directed several businesses giving me a true insight to that side of life. We were if you like, "bigger fish" in a small pond, respected by the neighbours and life was relatively good though there were lean times especially when my father went bankrupt, a period in his life I swore I'd never go thro.
In 1994 whilst I was directing my own four independant small businesses it became very apparent that my parents marriage was suffering and it was evident on their faces, eventually leading to divorce papers and seperation. It was at this point that mum started a period of depression that would lead up to her near fatal suicide attempt on 23rd June 1995 whilst in my presence in front of my house. I was 36. I only started to enjoy my life from the age of 26, 10 years I held dear, a very good and happy 10 years, but it was over!
Mum had deliberately ran under a 32 ton truck with an extra trailor attached at the rear, I really don't know how but she went under the middle section and only one of it's 18 wheels caught her left foot and caused some damage but unfortunately her skull was fractured. She then had continuous brain swelling over 24 hrs. Her coma lasted months and months, her prognosis was very poor and she was expected to die but her fighting spirit and prayers kept her alive.
I on the other hand lost all fighting spirit, I tryed to continue with my businesses for months but eventually it got to me with flashbacks and depression. Caring for mother slowly over time became the top priority not by choice but by nesseccity. Lives had changed for ever at a stroke June 1995.
I went on to spend an inordinate amount of time energy and fighting spirit to help mum to learn how to talk again and walk again against all odds given by doctors whom had given up. You can clearly see the results 15 years on by the pictures above of mum now 70. All this though has ruined my own life and existence as an entreprenaur and has robbed me of my dignity where personal wealth is concerned. If mum suddenly died I will be left homeless and destitute with nothing but yet I will of created lots of fat cat lawyers fees over the years with an inheritance bonus for waiting relatives. Is this right? I don't think so! Thus I now am hated and dispised by relatives and the courts because I am here fighting my corner for what I believe to be right, some justice for RELATIVE CARERS IN PRIVATE DAMAGES AWARDS.
Some peace at THE MOMENT in our new home, September 2010 but how long for?
Back to top
Where would you rather live, be honest! Should mum be put in a old folks home, should she be in her rainy home town of Oldham, forced to live in her daughters back bedroom or do you just believe she's in the right place? This is what I am fighting to maintain for mum, what she truely deserves. Its her money to spend on how she wants to live, its not there for others to run up solicitors bills squabbling and it certainly ain't there for inheritance! How long our life will exist we do not know as the background currently is a concotion of corrupt statements trying to discredit my care for mum on a welfare and financial basis in order to deprive mum of her liberty living and cared for by me, her son abroad where she has capacity to choose where and with whom she wants to live with.
Taken today at the golf course 161210 mum wanted a taste of what the golfing fuss is all about would she get this sort of treatment in a home - I doubt it extremely.
JUST A NOTE FOR THE WEEK 09.06.2011 The money I now receive personally each week that is classed as expenses and as such mums deputy will not pay it as a wage because he said it would cost more for mum as she would pay tax on it. Well interesting that isn't it. Whilst normal folk whom do a job get a wage slip I don't and when I go to open a bank account they say well Mr Clarke where is your income and when I point to it they say thats not proper income Mr Clarke. Likewise how can one proceed proper with one's life for example how does one get a mortgage so as to have your own property over your head. If my mother lacks the capacity to recognise these things then why is it that she wants to display her concern by trying to gift her pproperty by way of JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY & why can't the British government along with its corrupt establishment see it all, or can they?. Its very obvious really whom the theives are in all this mess but who'd of thought that in 2011 in Britain, this would be going on, but it is!
The court of protection say well if your abroad you can apply to take charge of your mother affairs in that country and when you have done it apply to the UK courts to have the assets and cash released to you but they fail to recognise that in reality my mother has nothing to prove in another country why should she demonstrate to the UK government her capacity or lack of when they hold no jurisdiction in the country of her residence. They are in reality extending their jurisdiction without it being legal in any way. In the meantime their corrupt deputies do there dirty work whilst your outside of the UK. My god, so corrupt its unreal. I spoke to lawyers here in Spain they advised that the cost of an application would possibly exceed £3000 and only have a 50/50 chance of success. So where does one start? Not very nice to think that your own country is effectively screwing you over and taking advantage of the elderly whom clearly have the capacity to manage their own finances.
Taken today 9.06.11 this is what mum sees to be the type of "home" she wants to reside in till she dies. This is our current rented property in Spain that we have been negotiating to swap with mums UK property but as soon as mums deputy got wind of it he tried to sell her UK property for figures approaching £100,000 less than its value and this is the type of thing your up against!
F.A.C.T Families Against Court of Protection Theft is an organisation of those who have had problems dealing with the Court of Protection (CoP) and Office of Public Guardian (OPG) and are based in the UK. There has been 15,735 recorded complaints of abuse, fraud and corruption from Dec 2001- Dec 2010 (9 years) of the CoP and OPG in the UK.
There are over 50,000 people plus their families affected by these abuses of the Court of Protection, Office of Public Guardian and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) jurisdiction which is also part of the Court of Protection and many young adults who may have autism or aspergers have been wrongfully put under this jurisdiction depriving them from their liberties. Some people would most definitely dispute that these disorders should not even come under Mental Health and whether these young adults are even a threat to anyone.
The Court of Protection and the Office of Public Guardian are a Government run Court based in Archway Tower, Archway, London. It deals with property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity or who are unable to make decisions for themselves. Those deemed to lack capacity are many Elderly people who may suffer from Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Disabled People, Road Accident victims awarded compensation and even young adults who maybe Autistic or suffer from Asperger's Syndrome.
The Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian are responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of Enduring Powers of Attorney, and Lasting Powers of Attorney, appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.
However we are very concerned with the way it is run and from recent press such as
As well as police corruption shown by Hoddesdon/Hertford police force as they protect the corrupt, accept bribes and even come to court and lie on Oath. Not to also mention corruption by all those we have reported to and are doing absolutely nothing. This includes SRA, Legal Ombudsman, Parliamentary Ombudsman, all our MPs, House of Lords and all our police forces. It is beyond a national DISGRACE!
Further articles to show Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian Corruption:
Flaws in the Court of Protection (CoP) were highlighted in a negative press campaign last autumn 2010. The CoP and the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) shared more than 4,000 complaints about its operations over the last two years. It is still being accused of mismanaging £2.7 billion it controls and which is held on behalf of those who no longer have capacity (Ps). Critics claim that it holds the money in a Bank of England account paying 0.5% a year rather than at High Street banks which would provide rates of three per cent. As inflation takes hold it leaves families with an income deficit needing to dig into the capital set aside for a lifetime of care.
The newspapers' campaign
An eye catching headline in the Mail on Sunday described the CoP as "The Secret Court of Living Hell". Case histories investigated in the newspaper's campaign included:
•An application to the CoP for money to pay fees for residential care taking too long to be processed. P's house sale proceeds were paid into an account held by the court. The money took five months to come through and was £10,000 short of the £35,000 which was required. The aggrieved relative said he was never able to speak to the same person twice about the matter.
•P was awarded £1.6 million. When her father died an application was made by her mother to take over from him as the person authorised to run P's financial affairs. The fees came to around £42,000 for solicitors, barristers and accountants.
•P's house sale proceeds were transferred into the wrong account. The mistake was only discovered when there was a request to pay P's care home fees.
•An administration charge of £4,100 to access £5,800 out of the £90,000 held by the CoP. P, a former solicitor suffering from bi polar disorder, complained requests for money which were supposed to take six weeks were taking five months and that the payments received were less than asked for.
•The father of an eight year old boy who had been awarded £4.2 million as a result of medical negligence was accused of being abusive to an official from the CoP on a home visit although nobody had visited him at their home.
There were complaints in particular about delays, expense, the long and obscure court forms, inefficiency and that the court was a remote entity serving itself. These were accelerated by the press attaching links to the articles censuring the Court. In The Mail alone 450 further accusations of incompetence followed on from one article. Internet forums posted comments that it sent bullying letters and treated relations like criminals. Saga magazine quoted children's author Helen Bateman whose husband was in a coma after an accident: "It is an alien, intrusive, time consuming and costly institution which was completely out of tune with what we were going through".
Court of Protection Rules Committee's Review
In November the then Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, responded to the concerted attacks by the press. A General Election was on the horizon and the Court was being described as an unresponsive Labour monolith working in secret and grinding its users down. Mr Straw asked Sir Mark Potter, the then President of the Family Division, to appoint a Rules Committee to investigate and recommend changes. The committee was chaired by Mr Justice Charles and Mrs Justice Proudman.
The committee met four times in the spring of 2010 and published a report in July 2010. There was recognition of the need for new court forms to be available as quickly as possible. They were to be custom made for the different types of application to avoid containing the lengthy screeds of unnecessary information the original universal forms require. Better explanatory notes are recommended to be attached to the forms as the current ones have led to confusion. Clearer forms would lower the 80% refusal rate for applications received between January 2008 and December 2009 to deal with property and welfare decisions on behalf of the mentally vulnerable. Forty per cent of applications are made by people without professional support. This is a failure in communication and assists those who fear the Court is composed of civil servants and lawyers busy talking to themselves while failing to provide a simple application process. Fortunately the new forms will be road tested in pilot schemes. Their success will depend on using simple English aimed at non-professionals.
A further recommendation is that court officers, rather than judges, should deal with applications concerning non-contentious property and affairs. Previously nominated officers were trained to deal with routine applications and there was lobbying for their return. There is provision for judges to review those decisions and it will make running the Court easier. Other recommendations of the Rules Committee address speeding up and simplifying procedure in response to the complaints of delay.
A key recommendation is that there should be no change in the rules concerning access to proceedings by the public. When and whether the Court should sit in public or permit its proceedings to be made public will be decided in each case by the judge. In March 2010 the Court of Appeal had already handed down a judgement on the application by the press to be permitted access to a hearing concerning Derek Paravicini, described as a human iPod. He is an autistic, high earning pianist living in sheltered accommodation, needing 24 hour care and unable to manage his finances. The press had been agitating against the Court's closed hearings in a high profile campaign. It was held that article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights covered access to information at a court hearing and there could be no blanket exclusions. The Court of Appeal held that decisions on press access should be within the discretion of the judge hearing the case. The Rules Committee followed the case law but decided against blanket open access.
Scrutiny by the public
In May 2010 an open judgment was handed down by Sir Nicholas Wall in DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS  EWHC 1217 concerning a woman aged 55 who had learning difficulties and an overwhelming fear of hospitals and medical treatment. She was deemed not to have mental capacity and unable to make a decision about her treatment. The President ruled that she could be given a drug in a glass of Ribena at her home and detained afterwards on a ward for treatment of cancer of the uterus. Fair reporting in this case though did include Mencap's support for the court's life sustaining decision
This re-opened the continuing debate in the press about the court having sweeping powers handed to it by the Labour government that were not open to scrutiny and openness. Previously decisions about life and death , sterilisations and abortions were made in public and could be reported by the media. Profound questions as to when the State can intervene in private life were aired. Fears were voiced that paternalistic doctors would combine with judges to make vital decisions behind closed doors, thus eroding the rights of the individual. The media continue to oppose blocked access on the basis that it more appropriate for countries whose leaders do not like their authority to be questioned.
Another press campaign led to the naming of a local authority which had treated a vulnerable person and their relations in a high handed manner without authority. The latest judgement released to the press concerned "birth control by force". Mr Jusice Bodey in August 2010 criticised a Midlands council who wanted a married woman aged 29 with an IQ of 53 to be sedated, taken from her home and have birth control imposed on her against her will. The plan to prevent her having children he held had shades of social engineering. There would need to be police involvement and contraception under restraint which he could not authorise under the circumstances
The Court does not have to handle these types of cases often. Public decision making should be encouraged. Ethical life changing decisions ought to reflect current social, rather than legal, values. Keeping people informed reassures them that judges are in tune with the current moral climate and not remote elderly beings living in a world of their own.
Court of Protection's First Report
In June 2010 the Court published its first report, covering its performance between October 2007 and January 2010. The target for an oral hearing within 6 weeks was met in 53% of applications compared with the target of 75%. The Senior Judge explains the shortfall in performance by insufficient Judges. He hoped the appointment of three full time judges in 2010 would help meet targets. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 which created the new Court of Protection did not provide for deputies (part time judges). Full time judges had to be brought in from the regions to cover the London work. The five regional centres were designed to take the hearing centres to the client .This had an impact of the regions that deal with 60% of the work. A more flexible system would be to amend the statute to provide for deputies. They could be drafted in to help with the work flow and be a pool of experienced potential permanent judges.
Applications were analysed. There were 40,000 applications concerning property and affairs and 95% of them did not require court attendance. Forms to apply for a power of attorney had been reduced from 25 pages to 12. There were 2,800 personal and welfare applications with a refusal rate of 80%. There were 13 Deprivation of liberty applications over an eight month period. The general rate of applications was averaging at 1600 per month.
Complaints were addressed. There were 1,672 complaints made about the Court (excluding ones about the OPG taking combined complaints to 4000). These divided into 25% about judicial decisions, 15% about the cost of proceedings, 15% about administrative errors, and 30% about the length of the process and delays. The rate of complaints reduced in the last 6 months and the Senior Judge credits the Court being integrated into HMCS in April 2009 as having had a positive effect.
Performance indicators were divided into three periods of time. There was an improvement in the proportion of applicants contacted within 20 days of receipt of the application (92%), and of those applications meeting the target for paper directions within 16 weeks (77%) but for those within 20 weeks underperforming by 14%. 59% of applications were heard within 6 weeks, a poor performance the Senior Judge hopes will be improved upon. Replies to correspondence within 10 working days were off target by 20% and down to 75%.
The report did not stem criticism. BBC's File on Four, broadcast on 27th of July, focused on new complaints. Parents of disabled children who became 18 had to apply at great expense to be deputies to manage their children's meagre finances and thought their particular situation had been overlooked. A compensation award invested at 0.5% interest instead of 4.5%, the Halifax rate of interest at the time, was bitterly attacked by an accident victim who estimated he had lost £50,000. Another accident victim was awarded £1.5 million and wanted to know the number of hours charged for by her deputy and after 3 months had not been told. The charity Elder Abuse was receiving constant calls to its helpline about fees for unnecessary work and the Court approving too many bills in excess of the £1100 capped rate. Delay in preventing financial abuse was highlighted. The niece of a hospital patient with dementia had taken £300,000 out of P's accounts and conveyed P's home into joint names. It took 3 months to cut off the niece's access to the accounts and no sanctions were taken against her. The Court was attacked for being slow and lenient. The programme concluded that lobbyists like the Court and the public do not.
It is worth remembering the previous Court was also vilified. A Parliamentary Ombudsman Report in 2005 noted poor staff training, high staff turnover, and serious mistakes in managing clients' money. There were poor investments and lost cash leading to compensation claims. Staff often never replied to letters and took months to sort anything out. When complaints mounted up internal memos were written which were "staggering in their arrogance".
Overall the Court is trying to improve. It does have a challenging client base and a large volume of work. Some of the delays maybe due to lawyers not using its emergency provisions (see Urgent Applications in the Court of Protection, Pierce and Jackson (Jordans)). It is admitting shortcomings and attempting to adapt quickly. There are now 2,000 applications per month. Previously the four judges based at Archway could not keep up with the volume of work. Although three new judges were appointed in Spring 2010 none of them had sat as judges before their appointment. Meanwhile two experienced Judges will be leaving by spring 2011. It is likely the Senior Judges optimism for future efficiency is misplaced and there will be more delay.
The media have a grievance about removing its right of access, at time when the culture is towards more open justice and will continue with criticism campaigning to get into the hearings. The pressure group Families Against Court of Protection Theft set up by relations who were unhappy with the CoP is also a vocal critic but has a limited ability to solve the problems of others. Website content such as the OPG's pledge to acknowledge a complaint within two working days, unless it does so, will fuel the flames.
It is hoped the new forms, produced with the benefit of the HMCS's drafting experience, will be an improvement on the OPG's previous efforts and will be comprehensible and user friendly. It has been a very bumpy start. The basement interest rates need to be addressed. The tenor of past complaints has been of faceless bureaucrats making incomprehensible decisions, then failing to communicate about them. Focus should be on running an efficient, responsive, problem solving service for the most vulnerable. For many, the Court is still not serving the most vulnerable but adding to their problems.
Having emigrated to Spain in March 2008 I just want to feel free, normal & happy.
Not overshadowed by the british government.
Human again & not repressed. My son would like his dignity restored not to be discriminated against as a relative carer but to be treated with equality and be paid fair like others. My money should not be in pounds but in euros and because of this its value since moving to Spain has devalued by 80,000 Euro. I should not be forced to live off an exchange rate by the British Government. My liberty and freedom of choice should be respected.
I suffer from dysphasia
People with dysphasia may have difficulty talking, understanding "not me", listening "not me", writing "not me" or doing numeral calculations "not me". They may be mildly or severely affected "not me". Everyday tasks, such as shopping or answering the phone "not me", may be impossible.
People with the condition can
"think clearly and know what they're feeling, and their intellect is maintained."
They're often mistakenly thought to be drunk or mentally confused "not me".
Read 2010 The CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT report on me thats just been delivered and its the second report in 10 years that confirms my capacity. So why am I being treated like a dog by the British Government?
A 4 page report by Dr Hana Al-Hamar 22.05.2001 that was the result of a 4hour examination.
Listen to Dr Hana's comments June 2001.
Dr Khan from the Lord Chancellors Office, 1 hour recording that is unbelievable as to why they keep mum in the Court of Protection 05.09.2001
The latest report in November 2011
Read 31 pages
The carer's work is never done and neither is it paid for!. Discriminated against as a relative carer there is no equality! It's also a 24hr attention span thats needed. I think sometimes, "I'd like to go to the beach for a day but there is'nt enough free time!" We think we'd like a weekend alone visit Morroco or Gibralter but again the tie is there and you can't. When family visit they think they're on holiday so not only are you still waiting on the patient you are also waiting on the family. I sometimes wish they'd say "hey Mike!" we're here you get off for the weekend and enjoy yourselves but "no!".
Treated like hired help but without pay, by your own family is sometimes how it feels. You also feel you have no home, no place of your own and people say well it was your choice but really it were'nt. My mother asked for my care and attention, how could I refuse. My life has been blighted overshadowed, not my own and for what, where is my salary for what I do. Not a wage in sight. Discriminated CARER! Family carer, so you get a benefit that amounts to nothin, but yet outside care can demand £12 an hour. WHY? When a patient is awarded so much money "FOR CARE", why is the family carer not paid his due's. Why is he/she paid a benefit below minimum wage and yet the government allow it to go on.
Whilst fat cat Lawyers, Judges and Courts take their own fat cat fees and wages for their intervention but yet the carer is treated like shit on the end of their shoes! TRUE.
There's something wrong with the system. I calculate for my care over 14 years I am owed £12 per hour for at the very least 14 hours a day 365 days a year 14 years, work that out? £800,000! But if you were just recognised as a working person on minimum wage of £6 that alone would of been £400,000? Whilst other family have built up their worth in property I have not been able to. Its been a mission just trying to work out what I can sell or scrape together each year for an annual holiday but who really gives a shit?
Well I can tell you absolutely no one, accept the people who are in the same boat watching others steal from their relatives estates without transparency, only in secret, accounting to no-one but themselves.
IT HAS TO STOP! The UK government needs to address this with urgency. Someone, somewhere, someday will lose it, mind wise, and someone will die, probably from the pure frustrations that must be building in these people, listened to by no one and I mean no one, or caring about "THE CARERS". Probably because we are a small insignificant minority, but we are gathering strength.
An investigation into a complaint I made on the 4th February 2010 lasted 7 long months, what on earth is going on? I'm sure a murder investigation don't take that long! - Investigation completed the day after I published this statement read the 3 lines Then upon asking for a complete full copy of the investigation passed to legal department whom refused a copy on the grounds of section 40 of the data protection act protecting others.
If I had my time over again knowing what I know now I would have had to refuse my mothers request even though that would of broken my heart. It's took its toll on me over the years but I really blame the UK government for this not my mother whom with all her "so-called" lack of capacity seems to be fully intact to me of which I hold Clinical Neuropsycologists reports to confirm her capacity that have been largely ignored. One day I do believe someone will do something about it and stop this barbarrick inhumane treatment of the people whom CARE the most about the patients.
Damages were awarded for the patients care but its that very standard of care that drops when families become involved because the system is that busy trying to stop famalies having any involvement with the care and money or at least them are the grounds they operate on yet in reality they are protecting their own long term fees whilst under that cover.
The carer whom is caring has no real access and no real say usually because other family whom are protecting their inheritance tend to side with the receivers or courts or worse won't get involved.
There was to my recollection, no money awarded for inheritance and there also was no money awarded for exorbitant fees and charges, so whats gone wrong with the system?
CARE and carers PAY was what the money was awarded for!
In our case one can take note that I personally did the first care of over 5 years before any money was awarded, living off benefits in a 1 bedroomed flat with me sleeping on a sofa! I sometimes think, and my mother the patient also agrees, I should sue her in the courts for back pay. I wonder?
Its ironic when we go out to a restaurant that the patient can order fillet steak but the carer can only afford beans on toast unless the patient issue's a handout. That's how its fealt for me over 15 years just living off handouts, no respect, no dignity, no nothing, treated like dirt when we should be rewarded better than the fat cat lawyers, judges & inheritance hunters etc.
I recently pointed out to the receiver HUGH JONES about the fact there is no wage and he said yes there is its paid in the account and I said its never been pointed out to me its a wage and if it ever was really a wage why has it not been taxed. Fiddling the state out of a tax paid wage I accused him off, with all the cuts that the government are making why are they not stopping carers from claiming benefits when high damages awards have been made to pay for care where that carer can then pay TAX! There has been a constant inbalance in the living standard of the patient to the carer whom as I pointed out that at the time of mums accident in 1995 I was living off an income of £1100 a week from one of my four businesses at that time which was all thrown away in the ensueing disaster in order to prioritise care for mum for free!.
So whats been the point in of it all salvaging the care of one life to ruin your own whilst FAT CAT lawyers and inheritence hunters all get the richer over time. Who is going to take notice of this corrupt system and the discriminatory inequalitys that are blatantly evident today in 2011 for private care damages that were awarded to pay for just that? CARERS! I recently complained to the EHRC The Equality and Human Rights helpline about this very matter and here you read their reply, "The issue that you have regarding care for your mother without payment is not likely to fall within the remit of the Equality Act. It appears that the fact that you are a relative means that you are not entitled to any of the payment award that your mother received to assist with her care.
This is not an equality issue and therefore, we cannot provide any further advice. " Now I ask you? does that not stink of discrimination and where I ask is the equality in that? Its obviously legal in the UK to discriminate against relative carers, no problem at all!
Manchester / Munby Judgement
R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE L & ORS : R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE R & ANOR (2001)
QBD (Admin) (Munby J) 26/9/2001
LOCAL GOVERNMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - FAMILY LAW - HUMAN RIGHTS
JUDICIAL REVIEW : FOSTER CARERS : RELATIVES : FRIENDS : SHORT TERM : LONG TERM : BOARDING-OUT ALLOWANCE : PAYMENTS : FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION : DEPENDENCY : S.8, S.17, S.22, S.23 AND S.26 CHILDREN ACT 1989 : ACCOMMODATION : PLACEMENTS : RESIDENCE ORDERS : LOOKED AFTER : LOCAL AUTHORITY : FOSTER PLACEMENT (CHILDREN) REGULATIONS 1991 SI 1991/;910 : FINANCIAL REPORTS : FOSTERING ALLOWANCES : NATIONAL FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION : NFCA : FOSTER CARE FINANCE : FCF : CARE PROCEEDINGS : WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS : IRRATIONALITY : HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 1950 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : ECHR : ART.8 : RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE : ART.14 : PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION : LEGITIMATE AIMS : PRESSING SOCIAL NEED : PROPORTIONALITY : NECESSITY
A local authority’s policy that financially discriminated against foster carers who were related to the children they fostered was unlawful.
Two joined applications for judicial review of the respondent council’s policy to pay those short-term foster carers who were friends or relatives of a fostered child at a significantly lower rate than other foster carers. Both applications concerned children who were looked after within the meaning of ss.22 and 23 Children Act 1989. In the first application, the maternal grandparents of three children were the children’s long-term foster carers and the children remained with the grandparents after full care orders were made. In the second application, the children were placed with their older half-sister when full care orders were made after an independent social work assessment. The issue was the legality of the policy. The applicants submitted: (i) the council’s policy was a financial disincentive to family members being foster carers and used their sense of moral obligation to compel them to accept a grossly inadequate level of financial support which was lower than the level determined by the council as necessary for the maintenance of other foster children of like age; (ii) the policy was an attempt to apply financial pressure on family members to move away from local authority support; (iii) the policy was discriminatory within Art.14 European Convention on Human Rights and failed adequately to implement the council’s obligation to promote the right to respect for family life guaranteed by Art.8 of the Convention; (iv) the policy was an attempt to transfer the financial burden of looked-after children away from the council and was an abuse of the council’s dominant position in relation to foster parents and children; and (v) the policy excluded any flexibility to allow payment of the normal fostering allowances to relative foster carers in appropriate cases.
HELD: (1) Section 23(2)(a) of the Act left the framework for providing for fostering allowances to the council’s discretion. That discretion had to be: (a) formulated and implemented to allow flexibility according to the needs of the individual children concerned; (b) exercised in light of the aim of the statutory framework without reliance on irrelevant considerations, without disregarding relevant principles, without being perverse and without conflicting with any duties within the framework; and (c) formulated and exercised to safeguard adequately the right to respect for family life in Art.8 of the Convention and to avoid discrimination in breach of Art.14 of the Convention. (2) The applicants’ submissions that imputed less than worthy motives to the council were not accepted. (3) The council’s policy was driven by the principle that it was undesirable to create a financial dependency on it if that would disincline a friend or relative to apply for a s.8 residence order. That was an entirely legitimate consideration and was entirely in accordance with the key principle in s.26(3) of the Act, namely that all appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that children were placed with their families as far as possible. (4) The council’s policy was unlawful for four reasons: (i) it imposed an arbitrary and inflexible cash limit on the amounts that could be paid to relative foster carers; (ii) it fixed the level of payments to relative foster carers at such a low level that there was an inevitable a conflict with the welfare principle and the council’s statutory duty; (iii) it was Wednesbury unreasonable; and (iv) it fundamentally discriminated against short-term relative foster carers and the children in their care. None of those objections were met by the legitimacy of the council’s objective. (5) The council’s obligation under both the Act and the Convention was to take all appropriate positive steps to ensure that children should live with their families. Differential treatment based on family relationships or which had an additional impact on family members could only be justified by counterbalancing factors of a compelling nature. If the council’s policy failed when tested against classic public law principles, it inevitably followed that it would fail to pass muster under the Convention. In any event, the policy failed to meet the key Convention tests of necessity and proportionality, thereby breaching Arts.8 and 14 of the Convention.
Roger McCarthy QC instructed by Green & Co for the applicants. Ernest Ryder QC and Yvonne Coppel instructed by and for the council.
LTL 26/10/2001 : (2002) 1 FLR 43 : (2002) ACD 284 : Times, December 10, 2001
Judgment: Approved subject to editorial corrections - 39 pages
Document No.: AC0101975
Reference link Solicitors link Full Judgement link
HE WHO CARES, SHOULD WIN, and eventually will! There's a saying in spain, "poco en poco", little by little.
Home is where the heart is and in 2011 this is our home
Thro all the family trauma a new addtion, JACK meets great grandma on 031010. The family get together at a pub for the afternoon was nothing short of a very tense situation.
My sister Angela wants to force her mother back to the UK to live at her house against her mothers consent and after failing to gain her consent and some very derrogatory exchange of texts published here, the following statements were made by the Angela CLAN.
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister Angela and my brother Kevin
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's husband David Platt
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Danielle Jones
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah Jones
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah's, boyfriend Paul Collins
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my brother's wife Tracey Clarke
In defence of the above I and others made the following statements:-
Response 091010 Read A statement made by Michael 6 pages
Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend Cheryl Cavanagh 5 pages
Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend of 35 years Stephen Power
Response 031010 Read A statement made by ex partner of 6 years Paul Moorby
Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years David Owen-Scott
Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Jonathon Goulding
Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Brenda Swain
Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Margaret Davies 3 pages
Out in golfers company for lunch mum wanted to sample some of what the golfers get up to.
Another brick in the wall
NOV 22 2013 FACEBOOK SELECTION
Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful.
The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation.
The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year 2011, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts.
In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes.
Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers.
The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England.
This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.
Like · · Share · Unfollow Post · 19 November at 14:15
Seen by 8
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh, Peter Hofschröer and 2 others like this.
Tatiana Ladislas von Montegatz Michael Clarke could you please explain if this information could be referred to the Court of Protection and be used?
20 November at 03:58 via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke yes IT can but in practice the courts have an habit of ignoring you as in my case
20 November at 08:18 · Like
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh fraud courts, corrupt system. Corrupt Queen who really don't care about us. More interested in donating money abroad but will watch her own people, elderly, disabled abused in this way and do nothing.
59 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 2
Michael Clarke Absolute agreement on that
57 minutes ago · Like
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh It's about time we had no Queen if she cannot do anything for her country or her people. What is she there for? For us to fund and pay her bills!
56 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke EXACTLY it is... SHE IS a waste of time and money
55 minutes ago · Like
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh So are MPs! what have they done for us victims? We are their constituents! They don't care about us! Waste of our money too!
52 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Also police what they are there for if they can't arrest criminals and can't deal with our cases. We do not need them if the corrupt pay them to not investigate, same with IPCC, Law Society, SRA, Ombudsmen, all waste of taxpeyers money. None do their jobs. A disgraceful country this is!
50 minutes ago via mobile · Like · 1
Michael Clarke MY MP GORDON MARSDEN is a complete waste of space the number of run in s I ve had with him and that was just to get an appointment... he has done nothing he I believe is scared of the corrupt lot and prefers to sweep it under the carpet....
47 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly same as me with my MP Robert Halfon. The abuse I had from his secretary just to get an appointment. First he was dealing with the case, then went silent, then wouldn't talk to me and I had abuse. He even ran to John Hemming MP to make false stories about me. Even sweep it under the carpet like they all do or more likely bribed by the corrupt!
40 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Whilst MPs are getting second homes, our homes and goods are being stolen. They don't care about us!
38 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke bribed by the corrupt! NOW THAT RINGS TRUE to me in every sense.... as time has gone on and on the more and more corrupt the entire state is uncovered... I've got to the stage where I NOW BELIEVE THERE IS NO JUSTICE ON OFFER.
38 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke there is only the OPTION OF REVOLUTION...
37 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke SO I PERSONALLY have joined the anti government protesting and rallies groups associated with bringing down the state as the only option to us... these bastards need to pay the ultimate price for their GREED.
35 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh All victims are having the same problems with their MPs, not just you and me. They do nothing for any of us! How many more victims do we need for them to ever do anything?!! Therefore if our MPs can't do anything for you and me and other of their constituents. What are they there for?
34 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke THEY NEEDING EVICTING OUT OF PARLIAMNET AND THEN OUT OF THEIR OWN HOMES
32 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke THAT IS WHY I USED THE COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST OUR SOLICITORS PANNONES AND HUGH JONES... if it were not worth the paper its written on then why did they spend £70,000 on corrupt bent courts and bent barristers and bent judges to try and stop me with false harassment charges to gain fraudulent injunctions???
30 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke The judicial system is out of CONTROL just like the identical GOVERNMENT with its BENT banking system built to rob and steal from the poor SLAVES... US! We got to put a stop to it all for the sake of CHILDREN.
27 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly
my suffering has paid for corrupt solicitors Amber Melville-Brown,
Hugh Tomlinson QC, Lorna Skinner's lovely homes and many more corrupt
6 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke SOMETIME's you have got to fight fire with FIRE so in other words if they condone robbery, theft fraud and violence in the form of coercion to corrupt courts with forced prison, then it is only right fair and equal that this should be matched by equal forces i.e., VIOLENCE!
9 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Agreed it's about time we took corrupt solicitors, judges and police homes and stole all their goods and see if nothing happens to us like them and for Law Society, SRA to see nothing is wrong & concluded at looking at all victims evidence 'they cannot see anything wrong, case closed, file closed on this matter'
3 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
NOV 22 2013
FOR THE ATTENTION OF RICHARD ALDERMAN IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
22 November 2013 at 16:12
Dear Mr. Alderman: The email exchange below is self-explanatory. If you were not aware of ACPO's Memorandum of Understanding with the Law Society, I shall be pleased to provide you with a copy of it. You may find it interesting to follow the internet links provided in the correspondence below. I can also provide you with information on fraud and corruption which has never been investigated by police. One reason for this (besides the agreement with the Law Society) is that, in some cases, police are party to racketeering or cover-ups, and another reason may be that police authorities are not staffed with personnel trained to a high enough standard in forensic accounting to be able to do the job of investigating white collar crime. For example, Greater Manchester Police - the second largest force in the UK - only has one officer trained and experienced enough to investigate white collar fraud. Obviously, serious organized crime affects all UN nations, and the UK is party to a legally binding UN convention to fight corruption. However, perhaps for the above reasons, this is not being done sufficiently, and therefore warrants serious and immediate attention. From what I have experienced, alleged responsiblity for crime, policing and justice in the UK seems to be spread across many ministries and ministers, and also be divided up among police, including ACPO, Sir Paul Stephenson, the Special Crime Unit, and various police authorities. When approached with the very serious matter of organized white collar crime, all parties refuse to investigate or intervene. Most just ignore the public and do not respond at all. I am wondering if the Serious Fraud Office, like the government itself, is dictated to by ACPO, and if it will therefore also refuse to investigate white collar crime and corruption? Referring a complainant back to their own police authority does not work because these authorities have already refused to log complaints of fraud, which is why complainants have attempted to escalate the matters - to no avail. There is absolutely nowhere that a person can go to get police to act. It is not possible to escalate the problem because there is absolutely no accountability by anyone in government. I am aware that an arrest of six solicitors was made recently, but there are many more involved in crimes such as fraudulent land title transfer, insurance fraud, and racketeering through the Court of Protection, and the Office of the Public Guardian, among other things. It is unfortunate that you are answerable to The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve, as he has never responded to these concerns at all. I wonder why the government is organized in such a way. Perhaps it is to spread the responsiblity so widely that nobody can be held accountable. This would seem to me to be the reason for it. The Rt. Hon. Nick Herbert talks about establishing a new Economic Crime Agency, but his department has written to say they will not intervene in individual cases, when they have already been advised of crime and corruption among police, and that nobody will investigate. Nobody can escalate a complaint to anyone as everything goes down a dead end street. There is absolutely no accountability by any public authority in the UK. At least, perhaps with Police Commissioners, someone will exert some authority over police and make them accountable to government and the people. There is a brick wall at every ministry and agency door in the UK, which is why there is now pressure on Europe to intervene. It would seem, from the press, that Europol will be involving themselves in British policing. It is unfortunate, but the country has brought it on itself by not adhering to the UN convention. Her Majesty's government is fragmented and not one person, with the exception of a handful of MPs and Lords shows any concern, or takes any action against the corruption that exists and is fostered among legal professionals, police, and the judiciary.. All are in denial. The Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke has been invited to ask for evidence of judicial corruption, and he does not. I wonder why. I don't know what the purpose of the British Prime Minister is. He should be taking the lead, instead of hobnobbing with media monopoly players. Nobody has any accountability to anyone. No doubt it won't be long before the British join Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Yemen, and the rest, and take to the streets. The British have become a seriously oppressed nation because of all the do-nothings in government. It is no wonder that the government has been buying riot gear for the military. Perhaps they are expecting the Storming of the Bastille. I look forward to receiving your comments, and your request for information on the crimes and corruption. Yours sincerely, Bernard Jenkin, MP Public Administration Committee Westminster, UK Dear Mr Jenkin As you can see from the information following this email, I have been alerting authorities since at least 2011 about the police's fraudulent crime figures. Heaven knows how long others have been alerting them. You will also find reference to police fudging figures in two new books by ex police officer, Stephen Hayes: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fifty-Shades-Black-Blue-revelations-ebook/dp/B00G8OB XD0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385045105&sr=8-1&keywords=fifty+shades+of+black+ %27n+blue Jil Matheson is the National Statistician. I believe she has been concerned since I advised her, but nothing has been done by government, with the exception of your own efforts, despite the matter being mentioned in parliament, and despite there also being several newspaper articles about police dereliction of duty since 2011, indicating that police only selectively investigate reported crimes, and most often refuse to record them and issue a crime log number. The financial bonus culture for any public servant makes Britain a laughing stock, but it is worse, when we think that it takes place within police. ACPO is behind all of this nonsense, and is a self-serving old boys' club that should be disbanded. Why on earth would the government not broaden the scope of HM Inspector of Constabularies? Wouldn't that be the most logical move? Obviously, something smells rotten. You should be aware of the fact that many MPs, including those on select committees, are deleting emails from the public, which are respectful and contain intelligence, WITHOUT READING THEM. They are doing it to many, many people, and Ministers are doing it too. It is every bit as serious a corruption problem as police ignoring reports of crime. I know of two people who have tried to report MURDERS and are being ignored by West Yorkshire Police - one of the worst police forces in the country for alleged corruption. They have approached oversight bodies and central government, and are similarly ignored. They have been fighting for justice in the matter for many years. May I emphasise that there are thousands of Britons who have been fighting for justice and police investigations into serious crimes, most notably sophisticated white collar, and yet both police and government ministers ignore them. We have reached the conclusion that police and government are part of the organised crime ring. What other conclusion would a person draw? Something is seriously wrong and, if Mr. Maude is concerned about public servants giving service, he should first examine who is blocking and deleting emails throughout government and public service, and under whose authority they are doing so. The problem of MPs and ministers deleting emails without reading them has been reported to select committees but, unfortunately, several select committee members, including Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge, are culprits themselves. The Public Accounts committee has acknowledged the concern but has no intention of doing anything about it, despite the fact that the culprits obviously do not represent good value for money for the British taxpayer. Perhaps we should have drawn this matter to your attention? Actually, I think some of us may have. The situation involving officials ignoring intelligence (particularly about organised crime) from the public is so bad that concerned citizens now broadcast this matter widely to officials in Europe and beyond, because it is corruption, and this corruption belies the fact that the UK is signatory to international conventions against transnational serious organised crime and against corruption. We feel that many MPs and ministers are fraudulently holding office, when they simply either block emails from the public or delete them without reading them, besides which they do nothing about the problems, even after reading the emails. Mr. Cameron and Mr. Clegg obviously couldn't care less, and it will be their undoing. Theresa May is even worse. The people have had enough. Britain is the weak link in international crime fighting. As you know, police had received information from Toronto Police eighteen months ago regarding Operation Spade, and did nothing with it. No arrests were made in the UK. Britain let the team down, as usual. Britain does not deserve to be a G20 or G8 member, and Kenneth Clarke is surely only jokingly be called the "Anti-Corruption Champion", as we have not seen any action from him ever. In fact, he has been part of the problem. As you can see, police also have an agreement NOT TO INVESTIGATE lawyers. It is shocking that this Memorandum of Agreement could ever have been set up. Please keep up the good work. It looks like you are the only one in the UK with any intelligence to realise how police are supporting serious transnational organised crime by their failure to record and investigate reports. I should also point out that many victims have presented their cases in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and yet nobody has taken any action to help them. This can only be due to institutionalised corruption on a grand scale and, until some action is taken to help these people, then we will continue to believe this. Yours sincerely, ATTENTION: MS. JIL MATHESON - REGARDING INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF CRIME STATISTICS Ms. Jil Matheson UK Statistics Authority Statistics House Tredegar Park Newport South Wales NP10 8XG Dear Ms. Matheson: I was interested to read in the newspaper that you will be working with ACPO and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary on an independent review of national crime statistics. You may be interested to know that, as a result of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between ACPO and the Law Society, white collar crimes involving members of the legal profession are never logged or investigated by police. As you can see, the Memorandum of Understanding is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice. National crime statistics, therefore, can never be accurate; they never were, and never will be, unless police start recording incidents. This state of affairs is a national shame. As a result, I understand that Europe is about to step in and do Britain's policing for them. http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/224895/EU-bureaucrats-win-power-to- probe-UK-crime Police have openly refused, and continue to refuse, to investigage fraud, perjury or forgery, if a legal professional is involved, telling the general public that it is a civil matter. If you have a moment to watch this video, you will hear a policeman telling the gentleman that fraud is a civil matter. This is standard practice. Complaints from the public are simply ignored. No action is taken, not even a report. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg Of course, fraud. perjury and forgery are crimes the world over, except if they take place in the UK and involve a legal professional. One must remember that most complex white collar crime involves a legal professional......and yet it goes unreported because police will not log the crimes, much less investigate them. There are currently hundreds, if not thousands, of victims of white collar crime up and down the country, whose cases have never been logged or investigated by police. Personally, I can attest to the fact that Lancashire police have refused me, nine times to date, a log or incident number, so that I may report a crime. The refusal includes a member of the Professional Standards Branch. Not one officer has ever asked me what crime I wish to report. It could be a murder; it could be anything. However, I believe that they are afraid because I have knowledge of corruption in that constabulary, which is why they refuse to take my report. I will gladly supply the details to anyone who might feel it is their duty to act. The Home Office has already said that they don't want to involve themselves, so I can only think that, as Mr. Cameron doesn't show any interest either, nobody in the UK cares. So crimes in the UK are going unreported and uninvestigated; therefore, your statistics will always be flawed. Your review is a complete waste of government money and effort because, as long as ACPO continues to run the country with its corrupt hidden agenda, and its Memorandae of Understanding with whomever it sees fit, reports will be a complete sham. You don't have, and will never have, true statistics. Crimes committed by the police are never logged, and there are many cases of police harrassment and brutality, such as that of South Wales Police continually harrassing Mr. Maurice Kirk, and Lancashire Constabulary continually harrassing Ms. Carol Woods - no log numbers for either issues - just police harrassment in a very serious and ongoing manner, including imprisonment without due process, and attempts to section these individuals under the Mental Health Act. I would be delighted to supply information so that the government might investigate, but it appears that it does not feel it has any authority over ACPO. It seems that ACPO runs the whole country, including the Home Office, which seems to condones everything they do, and which says it has no authority to invervene in any matters whatsoever. I always thought the Prime Minister would have some power if he should choose to use it. Baroness Neville-Jones offers no apology for the attached Memorandum of Understanding, and simply stated, while addressing the House of Commons, that the Memorandum of Understanding was decommissioned in 2007. It most certainly was not, as you can see from the video. What's more, it should never have existed in the first place, as it is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice, and ACPO has been doing so for a long time, and still continue to do so. That, coupled with the outright refusal by police in every single authority to write up incident reports and issue log numbers, is a culpable offence for police officers in most other country except corrupt Britain. It is corruption not to allow people to report crimes. Perhaps this matter should be taken to higher authorities before you waste your time? It seems like someone has already told Europe about it. If I can offer any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me by email or phone. Yours sincerelyDear xxxxxx Thank you for your e-mail to Jil Matheson. I will pass to colleagues working on the review of crime statistics and we will respond properly as soon as we are able. Kind regards Alex Elton-Wall Private Secretary National Statistician's Office UK Statistics Authority Tel: 01633 455306 Mob: 07795 800089 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
FACEBOOK ENTRY 15/12/2013
FRAUDULENT USE OF EU TAXPAYERS' MONEY - AUDIT
15 December 2013 at 13:29
The British public would like you to be aware of the fraudulent manner in which the British civil servants are operating, and to take action. Civil servants are denying Freedom of Information requests to the public, but what is worse is that Ministers and/or their staff simply delete emails from members of the public without reading them.
On several occasions, I have sent information to Francis Maude, Cabinet Minister, about this problem as he purports to be conducting civil service reform. I am far from being the only member of the public to experience it blocking from almost all ministries. The two examples I give today are just two of many from right across all government departments, and also from local governments. My purpose, when writing to Mr. Maude, was to advise him that this is happening in all public departments, as I innocently presumed that he did not know that parliamentary correspondence clerks often simply delete emails without reading them, and many of them contain intelligence to help them do their jobs.
His own private secretary/parliamentary assistant deleted at least some of them without reading them, along with other emails, and yet the very subject of the emails was about civil servants deleting emails! She provided the proof of it below.
As you will see from my email further down the page, civil servants in the UK are not providing service and are, therefore, every bit of a problem as those Palestinian civil servants who were audited by the EU. http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Civil+servants+paid+stay+home+audit/9277305/story.html
Members of the public are denied service, even by select committee members of parliament, who also either delete their emails without reading them, and ALWAYS ignore the information provided.
Here are some comments from other people regarding the matter. I have removed their identifiers:
From: martin brighton Date: 12 December 2013 21:30:35 GMTTo: david pidcock Subject: Re: SOMEONE IS MAKING A FOOL OF FRANCIS MAUDE
The blocking of emails to ministers by civil servants had been going on for years. The practice has several advantages:
a) The civil servants are controlling the flow of information, so control the game
b) The Minister is provided with the excuse of 'plausible deniability' when bad or sabotaged policies inevitably go t***-up
c) The Minister is then 'owned' by the civil servant
d) The civil servant can thus make or break any minister, who would be cut loose and blamed for not knowing what is going on
e) When the civil servant is controlled by a third party to which there is primacy of loyalty, that third party effectively becomes the de facto government - this is the crucial point.
There is such a third party that is riddled throughout the civil service, from Cabinet Office, down through every tier of governance, to local authorities and even street level.
Kerslake (Sir Bob) is inextricably entangled with that organisation, and publicly supports it.
Despite Eric Pickles saying 'No more spending by local authorities', they show him nothing but contempt.
Because Francis Maude and the Prime Minister support this insurrectionist and corrupt organisation, both Maude and Cameron are showing sheer and Utter contempt for Pickles, whilst the organisation (COMMON PURPOSE) shows contempt for them all.
In Sheffield, from 1997 to 2005, the Chief Executive Officer presided over multi-million pound fraud and corruption, whilst pandering to political whims, thus assuring promotion and teflon coating. Of course, even according to government's own records, things got worse, despite the hundreds of millions of money poured in. All the while, every project turned out to be an abysmal failure whilst the crocodile tears from the top whinged about the intransigence of public servants to culture change - exactly the same message we hear today from the Cabinet Civil Servant. And who was that CEO ? None other than Sheffield's former Chief Executive Sir Robert (Bob)
Kerslake (AKA KERSNAKE)
an extremely Uncivil Serpent!And what is this organisation ?
Yes, you guessed it -its Common Purpose
Of course, in terms that would embarrass Orwellian Newspeak, each failure is a sugar-coated triumph.
Of course there will be an Inquiry, but:
The Inquiry will not take place unless and until the outcome is already assured in keeping with the pre-set agenda.
The civil servants will control all the input to the Inquiry.
In Sheffield, the council's tactic to unwanted truths is to simply put an electronic block on the target's emails, then apply the policies of Deny and Lie, coupled with Control or Destroy.
Just like the Cabinet Office today.
Any continuity ?
Meanwhile, via the Cabinet Office civil servants, they refuse to be open, honest and transparent about Common Purpose membership within government, which is directly contrary to Civil Service rules.
Given the real agenda that is being played out by the back-door/back-room boys, Kerslake (KerSnake) is right to say that the Whitehall machine is performing remarkably well - but only if you consider that the Whitehall agenda does not reflect the manifesto of any elected government, but that of the clandestine, insurrectionist, corrupt, kerslake-supported organisation, Common Purpose.
Happy times ahead,
Dear Peter and friends who have suffered likewise from Secret Court abuses,
Thank you for making this point about the inhumane Italian case. Everyone that I have spoken to is shocked but not surprised by the savagery demonstrated by lead Essex Social services/ health partnership professionals. We have been observing and experiencing their brutal ways for years. I'm advised by the local clergy that they have received reports of several other horror services about how badly the social services and NHS health partnerships have behaved over the years. The bad behaviour is usually driven by the individual's search for promotion or money and in the case of the COP (note: COURT OF PROTECTION) and it's associates, power and money.
In our own case we had evidence of when a social services introduced/corrupt solicitor (Ms J. Pleass) instructed a psychiatrist (Dr. S Mann) to sign a COP form in order to obtain control and our family's money. It was done in a carefully timed way, so as to maximise control by social services and the solicitor who were working together with COP et al assistance. (The second corrupt solicitor working alongside the first corrupt solicitor was brother & sister owned Giles Wilson- calling themselves the Official Receiver and then Official Solicitor, in order to maximise their theft from our family under the guise of legitimate decisions carried out by a Secret Court, to whom we were disallowed an appeal)
We have seen that the people who did wrong were promoted up and up the structures as a consequence of their taking risks with us and with other people's lives too. They have been upsetting whole families and the rest of the course of their lives in a routine way for decades. The model of mental terrorism that Essex employs is echoed throughout the UK in those counties that like to follow Essex's model.
The Essex Deputy Social Services officer is also responsible as a leading National UK figure for the General Society for Social Workers organisation.
Unusually, the Non Essex MP John Hemmings seems to have taken the case up. He is one of the few that tries to do the right thing on this issue. There has been silence from Eric Pickles who is the Essex MP who may have been responsible for looking after this particular issue involving the Italian lady and her unborn child.
COP matters seem to be readily sidestepped by many MPs . These types of MP seem determined not to find answers when requests or concerns are raised about COP matters. The SoS minister Lamb was giving evidence in the House of Lords on 3rd Dec 2013 in front of a committee re. the COP, but I felt that many twists were interwoven into the evidence given. The witnesses were often not answering the question. They often seemed incapable of listening to what was being said to them. They sat side by side as they masked the seriousness of what has continued to take place under the Coalition, and Labour before that.
Real evidence shows how poorly the COP has acted. But the real evidence is frequently buried. And even when it is briefly aired, it is soon forgotten by those politicians who choose to ignore it. Few in politics seem concerned about how badly the COP et al continues to perform. Even fewer have admitted that this is organised criminal activity carried out by our own UK secret courts and the personnel who attend.
Lack of transparency pervades more and more of our so called public affairs. Meanwhile, the Secret courts are the root of much on going corruption. And the public are extremely worn down and upset by the lack of response shown when they raise this fact as evidence, again and again. We are tired of the fact that when evidence is called for, and we respond, having only just head about the call, we are suddenly stopped short. The receiving of evidence is suddenly curtailed. And the politicians are protected once more by the civil servants, from feeling the full scale wrath of the public. The public who object to secret courts need to have their complaints fully heard.
Various groups have experienced such poor management and performance by the COP and it's associates who work together most effectively to destroy so many lives.
The Secret court corruption is on such a widescale that we feel that the evidence committee should sit again and receive a further 2 reports from the ministers following the many questions that they failed to answer. And there should be at least two more sessions of evidence taking to hear from the focus group leaders who have experienced the non performance of the COP et al, often at first hand. There should be no attempt to put only the polished representatives before the House. The House of Lords Committee deserves to hear direct from the man & woman on the street who has suffered as a consequence of the COP et al's masked inhumanity and poor performance.
NOTE: The House of Lords Parliamentary Committee on the Mental Capacity Act refused to hear evidence of crime and corruption involving mentally incapacitated or vulnerable persons on the bais that people were named. So they evidence has simply been thrown into the garbage by the very committee that should be protecting these people. Mike Clark and several others received a letter from the Chairman of the Committee, Lord Hardie, after submitting evidence that should be investigated, and having been advised that MPs, police, and ministers have refused to either investigate and/or respond to allegations of very serious fraud taking place within the courts and/or facilitated by the Official Solicitor’s office. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/mental-capacity-act-2005/
This denial of service is mass fraud – they are being paid public monies to do a job that they are simply not doing. Furthermore, these Lords are concealing allegations of criminality instead of investigating them, and they will receive an EU PENSION at the end of their working life.
True to form, they all turn a blind eye when confronted with allegations of official corruption. There is not one person in the UK, including the Prime Minister, willing to address these allegations.
Some of the victims of serious white collar crimes have presented their cases, on several occasions, to Members of the House of Commons, and Members of the House of Lords. Some are recorded on video. There has been no offer of help for them, and the crimes are uninvestigated because British police refuse to record or investigate the allegations, and nobody in government cares.
Will you please be kind enough to read on. At the end of this page, you will see the evidence of Libby Dewdney-Herbert, Mr. Maude’s personal assistant, deleting emails without reading them. It shows a total disdain for the public.
As a result, I wrote the email highlighted in green, using information in the public domain, which highlights the fraudulent use of EU monies by British public servants, ministers and MPs. They are not doing the job that the taxpayers expect them to do, especially when they don’t even read correspondence from concerned citizens about the corruption of both parliament and police.
The items highlighted in yellow show how public servants are deleting emails addressed to ministers without reading them. As you will see, the new National Crime Agency is also deleting emails containing criminal intelligence. It is no wonder that the UK is unable to prosecute criminals operating at a high level of serious organised crime. Evidence may be lost, due to lazy civil servants who simply don’t want to have to deal with correspondence. You will see from some of the newspaper reports that they now do not deal with emails on Thursdays, and many take Fridays off. Many work from home, where there is no supervision.
These are ONLY TWO examples.
Britain is a threat to world security, and something needs to be done about both its abysmally corrupt policing, and its abysmal public servants and parliamentarians who allow them to block information, and who do nothing at all to investigate allegations of serious corruption and cover ups involving criminals with law degrees, judges, lawyers and police.
This may also be of interest to you:
You and 2 others like this.
Yvonne Stewart-Taylor https://www.facebook.com/.../response-to.../637761266286613
RESPONSE TO SOMEONE IS MAKING A FOOL OF FRANCIS MAUDE
“Decision FS50435121 The Cabinet Office carefully interpret a request about cont...See more
by: Yvonne Stewart-Taylor
about an hour ago · Like
Mike Clarke IT IS TIME to start to name them with dates of birth and photos of their properties with addresses as we are doing and to shame them publicly to publish it all.. www.opg.me
A claim made under common law, a claim made under GOD, a claim that GOD is my witness to the truth!! A claim made without any rebuttal!
Read the debt
& read LIENS RECOGNISED BY PANNONES & where it is clear that PANNONE s partner Richard Drinkwater, whom is one of our endebted partners within our own Commercial Lien above, against themselves at PANNONE s and his recognition of holders of liens where creditors such as us, "are authentic", where PANNONE s have openly claimed no recognition of "our commercial lien" against them or the Commercial Affidavit Process claiming its of no value. Can one clearly see the contradictions that are riddled in the company Pannone s, that is so called award winning, are the awards for contradiction. see the picture! Isn't it funny the minute a commercial lien is served upon them that they do not recognise it, so why did they fraudulently use harassement laws to try to curtail it! Probably spending, according to them in excess of £50,000. Was this action in effect recognition, of a perfected commercial lien? Seeing as this is turning out to be a trial by internet we will let you the public be the judge of this!
Appointed by judge DENZIL LUSH, against the direct wishes of the patient, Hugh Jones of PANNONE & Co solicitors Manchester took his position in charge of mums damages awarded to pay for care in 2001 the sum of £775,000, as her deputy/receiver. It has to be said and noted that his first years charges, expected to be £2500 as laid down by judge Denzil LUSH, actually came out at £26,371.77p! Take note that in his first year of office whilst he gave me and my mother £200 per week to live off he deducted from the damages £507 per week charges just to say NO! every time his phone rang.
The problems, having been astronomic to the point of writing a book, started from day 1 with the words from Mr Hugh Jones's "broad brush approach" that suddenly turned very narrow! Since that first year of 2001 he has refused to supply any details of the subsequent 9 years of charges that remain a secret to this day ON 311011. If it was your relative would you consider this theft!
Judge Denzil Lush
Whom in our opinion, has no idea of the family decimation that he is causing or if he does he is certainly turning a blind eye to the reality of the lies, ignorance, discrimination, corruption, theft, absolute breaches in human rights and the complete lack of equality that is the cornerstone of THE COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Our Labour MP representative for Blackpool South area, Mr Gordon Marsden. upon writing my concerns to him in November 09 it took him 3 months to send an unsatisfactory reply. I then wrote to the party office. On the 29th November 2010 I wrote to Gordon Marsden but to date no reply! Today 14.01.2011 I wrote to his party office complaining and sent a copy of the email back to Gordon of the 29th Nov 2010.
OPG- Chief - Alan Eccles
To Martin John Ex: Chief Executive of the OPG. Five statutory principles that underpin the MCA 2005:
• it should be assumed that everyone over 16 has the capacity to make their own decision, unless it can be shown they lack capacity
• a patient should not be regarded as unable to make a decision until all practicable steps to help them make it have been taken, without success
• a person should not viewed as someone lacking the capacity to make a decision, simply because the decision is unwise
• practitioners must ensure that any act done or decision made on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be in their best interests
• any decision made must also be the least restrictive of their basic rights and freedoms.
Working by ARCHAngel Michael In this section you will find some information about Archangel Michael. Archangel Michael is a prince of the
Angels, prince of light, regent prince of the seraphim, regent prince of the virtues, an angel of deliverance and
a prince of the divine presence. His name is in a form of a rhetorical question, meaning “ who is like God?”.
Archangel Michael is the angel of protection,strength and truth. He gives you courage to face the truth and
overcome any obstacles and fears that you have about your future. He helps us to find increased clarity in
what we think,do and say, and helps us to be more assertive and have more self - belief and self - assurance.
He helps us to work with the theme of personal will, showing and encouraging us to bring our own will into
harmony with Divine will (“Thy will, not mine”). As we become more aware of our personal power and will,
our capacity to be gentle and loving members of humanity increases. When we are fearful, Archangel Michael
comes to dissolve doubt and fear, and gently teaches us how to understand and work with the basic theme of
this world - that of duality and the battle between darkness and light. Archangel Michael is one of the Guardians
of karma, and can help us to work with and clear any karma or karmic entanglements we have with each other. In
his work with us on the First Ray he wants us to develop our own strength and willpower and to both recognise,
accept and integrate our shadow aspects. In our daily and spiritual lives he gives us the strength to stand up and
fight for what is right and light, and to recognise our own truths and stand up for them.
Michael is the Archangel of power, desire and action. He is often pictured carrying a sword which symbolises
the power of love and which may cut us free of all that binds us or holds us prisoner. His sword is surrounded
by a silvery - blue flame, which we interpret as the Magdalenen flame containing the innocent and pure energy of
the love of Divine Source - the flame from the great central sun at the heart of our universe. Blue is also the
colour of his protective cloaking energy, which we may invoke at any time we need protection. Michael’s
primary task is to cleanse Earth’s atmosphere and the auras of all humankind of all lower thought - forms,
dissolving all that is not perfect or of the highest vibrations. He wants to show all sentient beings the path back
To God when they have strayed. Archangel Michael has also taken on the role of Protector and Guardian of mankind,
and he is relentless in his protection and defence of those who wish to live in the light. He is committed to help all
souls who call on him and will always assist in whatever action is necessary to bring about justice and resolution.
Another symbol representative of his energies is a scale of balance, representing Justice. He also carries the gold
Ray of Source, which may sometimes be seen blazing from his solar plexus, or surrounding him.
INFORMATION ABOUT ARCHANGEL MICHAEL
Name meaning “He who is as God”
Virtues Health, Organization, Power
Colour of Aura Blue, Gold
Guards this day Wednesday, Sunday
Ray Works with the First Ray of Divine will, Power and Protection
Relevant Chakra 5th ( Throat) and 3rd ( Solar Plexus)
Related to number 6
Related to Crystals blue crystals: sapphire, blue topaz: for peacefulness, and healing
Yellow / gold crystals: yellow topaz, citrine: to initiate positive action,
Improve communications. Other crystals are Ruby, Tigers Eye, Amber, Turquoise
and Lapis, Chrysolite
Aromatherapy oils Myrrh, Eucalyptus and Lemon
Herbs Chamomile, Rosemary, St John’s Wort, Mistletoe, Melissa, Eyebright
Incense Frankinscense, myrrh, Copal, Cinnamon, Bergamot
Colour Gold, Yellow
Symbols Sword, Blue Cloak, Sun, Gold, Metal Colour, Scale of balance
The Function of Archangel Michael
Archangel Michael is the guardian of the house of spirit and dreams, and is the archangel working for cooperation and
reconciliation. Now is the time for us to learn to live in peace and harmony with others, to break down the barriers that
have separated nations, political parties, religious sects, families, and individuals due to differences of opinion, fear. All
of us are citizens of Earth, regardless of our diversity. In the movement toward this level of cooperation, Michael is the
being to invoke.
When to ask Archangel Michael for help
You may want to invoke Archangel Michael when
• you are faced with changes that you are uncertain about
• have a person or situation you are having difficulty confronting
• need help with clarity of communication
• when you need physical strength
• when you wish to cut ties that bind you to a thing, person or situation
• when you need spiritual protection
How to Invoke Archangel Michael
Michael protect me
The sword of Michael and his truth protects me
His cloak of blue covers me
Michael give me the strength as I courageously face this situation
Michael cut away all falseness with your sword so that I may be myself
I courageously claim my power
The energies of the Angels and the Stars strengthen me
Righteousness, truth and love is my path
Visualize the sword as metal or a living flame helping you to cut away fear
Archangel Michael is the warrior Archangel associated with Life Mission and Divine Purpose.
We are currently in a time known as 'The Age Of Michael', so-called because Michael is working with SO many people right now.
This powerful and mighty Angel comes through frequently in my Consultations because it is vital that we all stand up and claim our Divine Right Purpose; the work we came here to do.
It is also imperative that we have the courage to let go of situations and patterns that are blocking this. Michael lends his Sword Of Truth and Light to cut away all that does not serve us.
Archangel Michael is working consistently from the Upper Realms this year to guide you onto your Highest Path; that which will most highly serve yourself and the entire planet, and will bring you the deepest fulfillment, joy and love.
If you have not yet consciously connected with this magnificent warrior-like Archangel, perhaps this message is a clear sign from him that you take steps to do so!
Even if you regularly make contact with him in your own way, today Michael has a specific message, which I have channeled for you. Just reading the words given from High Beings such as Michael creates changes in your personal vibration, and will open your Heart to accept more Love into your life.
"Dear All Bringers Of the Light upon the Earth,
I am deeply honoured to make my connections with you at this critical time in your beloved planet's evolution.
Many of you are familiar with my vibration and words - having sought me out in times of intense change and doubt, many fears for your future purpose being the first thing on your mind when you call upon me.
What is important to know is that any time you activate my Light within your Soul, simply by calling me in, the profound vibrational shifts and micro-cellular activity within your energy field is begun. This spiritual medicine works upon your whole being; physical, mental, emotional and within the Chakra energy system.
Without conscious awareness, you are then strongly guided to make life choices and changes that you may have been avoiding through misguided fear. Everything I guide and direct you to do is through my all-encompassing Love for you and your contribution to peace in the Universe.
Now is the time when I make myself known to you with a renewed vigour!
For a new time has commenced - this I must impress upon you now. A new time wherein all Souls who have elected to be the harbingers of real, positive and electrifying change are called up for active service to the Divine.
This means YOU, Dear Child of Holiness.
Believe my words as I speak, that I am directing you with haste and speed towards a life that is your truest and most Heavenly function. If life seems to speed up a little forthwith, make no mistakes in your thinking - it is MY work!
I am swelled with Love and pride for you, my Blessed children of Light,
Lord and Messenger of Truth, Honour and Holy Purpose."
SO AM I A NUTTER & WHAT IS A SOVEREIGN?
So, what is lawful rebellion? (or being a freemen on the land)
I’ll try to give a little basic background to it.
(Please note it’s not comprehensive it’s just a rough guide)
In the year 1215 the first of our constitutional rights were set down on paper, it was called the Magna Carta, this was basically an oath from the crown (King or Queen) to uphold the rights of the people set down in it and to look after the peoples best interests, in return for the crowns promise to the people they agreed to be ruled by the crown, so it was a contract between crown and people basically, and it became the law.
The crown had to uphold the rights and common law as did the people, not to cause death, harm, or loss to another, or be fraudulent in your contracts (in other words be honest and true).
In 1689 the bill of rights was set down on paper, this basically sealed all the rights given in the Magna Carta plus a few more, both documents contain our UK common law written down and formed our law.
These two documents are the main fundamental parts of our UK constitution, yes we do actually have one, many claim that the UK has no written constitution, this is not true. We have the most respected constitution in the world, it is the basis of the constitutions of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India.
Rather than being one written document we have several that make up the UK constitution, the primary of which is the Magna Carta and the 1689 bill of rights. (the freeman movement in Canada seems to be gaining respect from some Canadian policemen) Part of both the Magna Carta and the 1689 bill of rights states that they cannot be repealed because they are such well-made laws and rights!
“”Lord Justice Laws on 18th February 2002: "The special status of constitutional statutes follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689…Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not…." “
Now our ancestors were not daft, they knew there could be a problem one day if the crown became unjust, or turned into some sort of dictatorship, or parliament was acting against the people, or was full of corruption, or was not allowing the crown to keep its oath.
So in article 61 of the Magna Carta it was written that if this ever happened you could petition the crown to sort out the crowns problem (or parliaments if it was them), the crown had 40 days to fix it or dissolve parliament.
If in the 40 days nothing was fixed the petitioner could go into rebellion against the crown and parliament lawfully until the problem was resolved.
Because this was lawful and the petitioner had a right to do it he would go into “lawful rebellion”, he would no longer have allegiance to the crown or parliament because they had become corrupt etc, he would be a hindrance and a rebel, and fight to end the corruption or injustice within the system, it was law that he could do this, and he was actually obeying the law by doing it, because it is the peoples duty to fight corruption and uphold the law.
So that’s the basics of it.
Because our constitution cannot be repealed it is still valid law.
Now, to do this today you first send an affidavit (a sworn oath of truth, the most powerful lawful and legal document you can get) to our Queen, stating that the crown or in this case our government acting for the crown and its MPs are breaking the constitutional contract (and they really are breaking it), and ask for it to be fixed within 40 days, this is witnessed and counter signed and sealed by a credible witness (I used a solicitor).
I did not make my oath lightly, I took an oath to defend the crown when I joined the army, I was now withdrawing my oath of allegiance, it may sound strange to some but I had a lump in my throat doing it, it was made in good faith.
It is then sent to the queen, then if in 40 days the problem is not fixed a second affidavit is then sent to the Queen, this time saying that the problem is not fixed and therefore the crown or government acting for the crown has broken the contract with the people, and you are therefore no longer going to obey or be ruled by a corrupt crown or government, you are now in lawful rebellion.
Now contrary to what any government officials may tell you this is lawful, and it is a binding oath sworn before God (and the witness), it is my right, your right, everyone’s right to do this, but only if there is a genuine breach of the contract.
The powers that be want you to believe that we have no constitution and anything we do have has been repealed, or 90% of it anyway, it’s in their interests to have you believe this so they can get away with anything they want without the people stopping them.
As you can see from the statement by Lord Justice Laws it is our constitution and cannot just be scrapped by parliament or our self-serving MPs and politicians, it is still valid law no matter what our politicians say, they have never ever had the right to repeal any of it.
Some of the breaches we are using for entering lawful rebellion are, corruption in parliament and our government, we all know this is happening, It’s not just one party its them all.
Our past and present government has allowed and is allowing foreign powers (the EU) to rule over us. The European Union, this is a hugely corrupt system and its not working in anyone’s best interests except the EU politicians and their powerful business associates, the EU is a dictatorship, run by un elected leaders, look into it and you will see this is true.
When our government handed over our sovereignty to the EU they committed treason!
This is 100% true, they really have committed treason, take a look at the Ukip website for some very interesting facts and figures etc., it is beyond belief what the EU gets up to (I’m just using Ukip as they have collected a lot of info, not because they are the exception to any other party).
The EU is our peoples greatest enemy, second to that is our own government and most of the mainstream parties, I know that the police are supposed to be non-political but you all have freedom of thought and I am sure you must realise what a corrupt bunch of leaders we have (done worry I’m not looking for comments on this! lol)
When our government does something wrong they just pretend they haven’t done it, if it gets to hot a subject they stick a gagging order on it (D notice I think is the correct term?).
Lawful and Legal? What's the difference?
There’s lots of talk on the freeman sites (and other sites) about being Lawful and legal and the difference between the two, but there’s not much in the way of a basic guide so it ends up confusing, some will know the difference but for those who don’t here we go. Basically anything in our constitution including common law is lawful (true law).
Any acts that parliament have passed are legal, these will be in the form of acts or statute laws, these “legal” acts should not contradict common law or what’s in our constitution, some of them do but we won’t go into that.
We had a system in place that could not be changed (common law and our constitution), so if parliament wanted to pass new legal acts etc. it had to find a way of doing it and making it enforceable. The Royal navy already used a legal system called Admiral law to keep its sailors in check and make sure its members obeyed officers and the navy rules, all navy members had to swear an oath to obey it etc. it became a legal contract and so it was enforceable. It was only used on ships and within the navy but it worked and was ready made so parliament adopted it (or a version of it), now parliament had a system to use to make new “legal” laws.
For it to work people had to think it was lawful, we did not know any different so we just took it as being right and obeyed, but none of us have ever sworn an oath to parliament or the crown to be in the navy and obey admiralty law (unless you have been in the navy I guess), so there is no binding contract between legal acts or statutes and the people, we have been getting duped into obeying them.
A statute law or act is in legal terms is defined as “ an act given the force of law by the consent of the governed”, note it says consent, so if you don’t consent to it and there is no contract between yourself and the other party it is not law.
So now you see why freemen (and those claiming to be freemen) will say I do not consent, and there is no contract between us, I have broken no law when you are going to arrest them or make them obey an act or statute legislation.
I have served my lawful affidavits to the crown and I am not in the Navy or under admiralty law, so I am a freeman on the land.
When the queen made her coronation oath it was to uphold the people’s rights and common law and do her duty for our country and its people.
When you made your oaths to the queen it was to her so she could uphold her oaths and the law.
When I swore my oath I did it lawfully and honourably in good faith, and for the right reasons, so please don’t write us all off as nutters, I urge you all to please give us the benefit of the doubt when dealing with freemen.
If the person you are dealing with has filed their affidavits and is genuinely in lawful rebellion under article 61 of the Magna Carta (they should be able to show you proof), I urge you to please follow common law when dealing with them, they are truly under the jurisdiction of common law only, not acts of parliament or statue law.
By trying to hold a genuine freeman on anything other than a breach of common law you would truly be breaking common law yourself, and your oaths were to uphold our queen and common law.
I genuinely hope this has given you a little better understanding of what we are doing and why.
Thanks go to Rebel Leader http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk
for allowing me to use this article to explain what a freeman/woman on the land is.
A court of equity is a court which can apply equitable remedies to disputes. Courts of equity operate within the legal system, but rather than focusing on the application of law, they look at cases and determine outcomes based on fairness. Also known as chancery courts, courts of equity can be found in many regions of the world. In some areas, they operate entirely separately from courts of law, and in others, a court of law is empowered to handle both legal and equitable remedies.
The concept of a chancery court arose in England when citizens began to express dissatisfaction with legal judgments handed down by the courts. They argued that the law was sometimes unfair, and that some situations were not covered by the law, making it impossible for the courts to respond. Courts of equity arose to handle legal situations in which people might want damages beyond monetary damages, with the judge empowered to act on discretion, rather than following the rule of the law.
A court of equity still has some legal responsibilities, but it has more leeway when it comes to judging cases. It can hand down a judgment which includes an equitable remedy such as an injunction, as opposed to simple monetary damages. Courts of equity can be used for things like specific performance, for example, in which someone is asked to make good on a breach of contract.
Notice to the High Court:
Delivered by hand – at the Manchester Justice Centre:
14th January 2013. CASE 2MA90015
Notice is given to ‘the court’ of the following: -
In the matter of MICHAEL CLARKE (legal fiction).
· Challenge of jurisdiction:
· Challenge of the legitimacy of the judge:
· The Queen is no longer sovereign:
· All prior orders are void:
· There is no case to answer:
This notice is delivered in writing prior to the commencement of any hearing in recognition of the fact that in the past when reasonable approach has been made to ‘the court’ to deal with the issues presented below… the court has adopted a position of abandonment – and has resorted to secret hearings to declare judgment in an effort to retain its authority… we can no longer tolerate avoidance of the facts and we thus challenge the court to address these issue or be condemned by its own acquiescence through silence.
No court can make judgment in its own cause… it is anathema to justice. We claim that the High Court has no legitimacy… because it fails to uphold the rule-of-law and has resorted instead to the rule-of-force (coercion) to impose its claimed authority.
Legitimate authority derives from consent not coercion.
The court must address the issues raised or the authority of the court evaporates. The issues are not going to go away and more and more people will challenge the court until addressed.
Challenging the authority of government and the legitimacy of the judiciary is a democratic right where questions of propriety arise
Challenge to Jurisdiction:
In the matter of MICHAEL CLARKE (legal fiction):
MICHAEL CLARKE is a legal fiction - summonsed by High Court order to ‘appear’ today and is presented to the court as ordered – in recognition of the authority of the court and its jurisdiction over the legal fiction The legal fiction appears by way of a copy of the birth certificate… as the ‘original’ certificate is not available.
MICHALE CLARKE as referred to in the High court document is not a living sentient being… i.e. a man – this is self-evident - as no man is subject to the authority of any other without his consent - we are all born equal. This is not a romantic notion it is a statement of cold hard fact.
Neither the denial or bluster of the legal profession in any capacity will suppress the authority of logic – and we present to the court the logic that ‘no man has authority over any other without their consent’ – if the court claims so to have… show the law.
The authority of statutes are imposed legally upon ‘persons’ which are corporations. The legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE is a corporate entity. ‘Person’ is not defined in statute law as ‘a man’ and therefore it isn’t ‘a man.’ The authority imposed upon the legal fiction the ‘person’ transfers to the man upon consent – upon using ‘the name’ of ‘the person.’ No consent = no authority. Imposed authority is coercion. Coercion is unlawful.
The name MICHEAL CLARKE does not attach itself to a man as a compulsion… is happens only by consent.
No authority exist that permits one man to impose his will on another man without his consent… this is unlawful. The government can however claim authority over the legal fiction, created by government.
The court repeatedly avoids this issue… because the legal fiction is the foundation of its authority and with this revealed… the true authority of the court i.e. ‘the consent of the people’ is exposed. The courts paranoia – that it will lose its authority if the legal fiction is exposed is unfounded… the reverse is now the case… the legal fiction (115 million pages on Google) is well and truly established as a fact and the continued denial by the High Court only serves to diminish its authority… by diminishing trust in it. It must surely be the case that Judges who continue to deny the legal fiction will attract cynicism and distrust to all judgments of the court, thus bringing it into disrepute.
No group of men can write regulations (Acts of parliament) to subject other men to their arbitrary authority – we are governed by consent – this is not a hollow claim – it is a maxim and is the very foundation of our governance. Statutes have only equal authority of government, they do not exceed that authority – thus statutes must also be subject to our consent and the withdrawal of same.
We know fully how that consent has been secured through the legal fiction… High Court judges know how consent is secured through the legal fiction and through presumptions, in the absence of the denial of consent.
Let it be made clear… consent is and has been denied consistently – all presumptions and assumptions are denied.
The jurisdiction of the court is subject to the consent of all parties to a dispute.
If the ‘High Court’ insists on asserting that it has authority beyond consent over the man (not the legal fiction) then show the law that authorises it. If the court insists on imposing its claimed authority - in the face of the denial of consent then a claim is raised that a tort has been committed against the man and the liability falls to the administrator of the court.
If the High Court will not give way to the demands of the people that it respect and uphold our laws - then its authority evaporates… and its relevance diminished to nought. All that remains is tyranny.
The jurisdiction of the court is challenged on several levels… even under its own rules.
No case to answer: There is no subject matter. Late delivery by the Pannone.
Hearsay (written affidavits) inadmissible – due to ‘Notice of intention to rely on such evidence’ not given.
The court claims to control who can and cannot address the court. ‘No right of audience’ this is a patently bias in favour of the legal profession – bias is unlawful. A judge who imposes the restriction of ‘No right of audience’ must recuse themselves for bias. [Barristers are servants of the court – this is a conflict of interest where the ‘defendant’ is challenging the authority of the court.]
Representation in court by individuals who are not servants of the court will be more robust in their challenges of the court. The exposure of the legal fiction is testament to this.
Challenge to the legitimacy of the judge:
· The authority of the High Court judge is challenged - where there is no evidence of the authority so claimed then none exists. We have moved beyond ‘authority by assumption.’ Authority by one can only be imposed on another with their consent… if no consent is given then the imposition of authority implies a master slave relationship… slavery is repugnant and goes against the basic principles of a civil society – those who insist on the imposition of their authority without consent are tyrants – and tyrants are a threat to the peaceful coexistence of all free people – they must be vanquished.
· Tyrants have been dealt with before – Magna Carta and the Declaration of Rights is the legacy of that struggle and these laws are at our disposal today to strike down any new attempts at tyranny – even when it comes dressed up as law.
· Acts of Parliament are not laws… if they were, they would be called Laws of Parliament. Acts of Parliament are merely statutes, they are referred to as statutes … and statutes gain the authority of law when they are consented to. We are not adverse to consenting to statutes – but those designed to impose overbearing control will be opposed – and rightly so.
· The constant imposition of unreasonable statutes is the flint to the dry grass… and the judiciary may be the first bale to burn.
· The authority of the judge derives from the sovereignty of the people on whose behalf they administer justice… they do not impose their decisions on their own created authority. The people’s authority is represented by our Sovereign Monarch… to whom the judiciary give sworn allegiance that they will uphold our laws.
· If there is any diminishment of the standing of the Monarch then the authority of the judge fails because he/she too would lose standing.
· Where the Monarch’s authority fails… the people’s authority remains intact… because the people’s sovereignty is supreme.
· Where the Monarch’s authority fails – so does the judges – who must then seek a new authority from the people… not from politician’s as this would destroy the fundamental principle of the separation of powers – and judges cannot create their own arbitrary authority.
· The Monarch’s authority has failed… brought about by the duplicity of parliament which has surrendered its own authority contrary to our constitution. Her majesty did not prevent the surrender of parliament to a foreign power by refusing the Royal Assent – despite over a million signatories in petition. Parliament may well have surrendered its sovereignty to a foreign power… but the people’s sovereignty remains intact.
· The people’s sovereignty is secure and our constitution defends it through its various elements such as Magna Carta.
· Magna Carta is the law and judges of the High Court must submit to it – or suffer the consequences of the law.
· Nobody is above the law – and that includes High Court judges.
· Lord Scarman said… “A government above the law is a menace to be defeated”
· It is undeniably the case that a judiciary above the law is a tyranny to be defeated………. our law is unequivocal and it is this: - “No man shall be imprisoned without a jury of his peers”
· It seems that today’s judges have been ‘trained’ beyond the capacity to understand this basic and simple logic.
· Those judges who step over that mark and act in defiance of our law must be held to account and striped of their duties – and their pensions.
· If this court does not concede to the demand of a trial by jury then that demand will go to the highest court in the land… the people’s grand jury – to settle this matter once and for all.
· If it is necessary for the people’s grand jury to be called upon… and it finds in favour of trial by jury as it surely will because it is the unquestionable right of the people, then the full body of High Court judges will have to be dismissed and replaced. It is not beyond the powers of the people to do this.
· The sovereignty of the people is not in question – but the sovereignty of Her Majesty must be seen to be in doubt – if the claim made by John Major (Ex Premier) has any validity. Major said of the Queen “ The Queen is a citizen of the European Union” – this claim is to imagine the death of the Queen. The Prime Minister would not make that statement without legal advice because of the constitutional significance.
· The implications are that the Queen has accepted mediatisation. i.e. she is no longer sovereign.
· If the Queen is no longer sovereign – where do the courts and judges claim to have secured their authority?
· The political establishment have devised a wheeze to avoid this vital question… they obfuscate with the phrase ‘shared sovereignty’ which is an oxymoron and can be discounted as nonsense.
· We either have sovereignty or we do not. If we have sovereignty then the authority of the court is not in question… only its actions. Its actions to deny trial by jury are unlawful. There may be some ‘legal’ provision to deny a trial by jury (it is doubtful) but even if there were -‘legal’ is not ‘lawful’ and where they are in conflict then ‘the legal’ provision would not stand because it would be defeated by our common law (supreme law).
· If the Queen is no longer sovereign, then the authority of the High Court falls on this reality. If the Queen is still Sovereign then there should be no problem getting confirmation of this fact from Her Majesty… there are channels to secure this written confirmation by Her Majesty’s Private Secretary. This is not beyond the capability of the High Court for Her Majesty’s Sovereignty to be confirmed in writing. Silence will tell all.
Re: Constitutional Monarchy
· The United Kingdom is defined as a constitutional monarchy because we have both a constitution and our Head of State is a Monarch. Our constitution defines our form of government – the government does not define our form of constitution – in recent times this principle has been unlawfully reversed without the consent of the people and has been carried out by unscrupulous politicians, aided and abetted by members of the legal profession. The courts to date have made no contribution to stopping this process of change that has diminished the people’s sovereignty whilst enhancing authority elsewhere including with foreign institutions.
· If the sovereignty of the people has been compromised and the reversal is not challenged, then we are clearly culpable through our own apathy.
· The constitution is the foundation of our freedoms and our liberties and MUST be upheld by the courts… or the courts must be abandoned.
· We now have a government that seeks to rewrite our constitution and by so doing empower itself – at our expense.
· A demand for jury trial is exercising our constitutional rights, which if denied gives evidence of collusion by the courts with unlawful governance – we cannot be allowed to stand. This is treason.
· No order made by a court that lacks jurisdiction has any authority – it is void.
· A void order cannot be breached – the order does not exist.
Does the court claim that MICHAEL CLARKE is a man? – then let the court provide the proof. The evidence of logic to the contrary overrides any such claim.
Does the court claim authority over the man? – Then Let the court provide the proof.
Can ‘the judge’ give evidence of his authority… his oath of office? His Warrant from the Queen?
Is the Queen still Sovereign? The evidence suggest not.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
We understand that the judiciary take oath amongst themselves not to engage in any discussion in court re the legal fiction entity and under pressure to do so they are instructed to abandon the court… suppression of the fact re the legal fiction being paramount.
There is recurring evidence to support this claim… the judiciary will not discuss this matter – which gives rise to the certainly of the legal fiction. There are in excess of 115 million web sites on Google which overwhelming support the concept of the legal fiction… this is quite staggering - there is random but sparse opposition to the idea… logic dominates. To reinforce the position… the judiciary will not engage.
If the judiciary serve another master… then they must recuse themselves.
We understand that the court order stipulated that MICHEAL CLARKE should appear before the court – and this order has been complied with. If the court dissents – then the court should give evidence as to who the name is. A judicial determination.
The man is prepared to present himself to a court of law… he is not adverse to justifying his actions… but he will not respond to coercion and the threat of violence against him made BY THE COURT – coercion is unlawful – the courts themselves are not above the law.
The man will make himself available to a common law court.
Show the law where the court claims the authority to imprison a man without a jury of his peers. We present Magna Carta as the law – well established… that says he must have a jury trial.
The CPR may not provide for a jury trial – but nor does it provide for its exclusion. Nor does it claim the right to suppress our constitution… it seems to leave this to individual judges… if they are bold enough to do so. Surely the CPR rules are a trap for unwitting judges.
The matter to hand:
Contempt of Court.
· Honestly held belief: Freemen have an honestly held belief that they have a right to a fair trial… which means a jury trial – and that statute courts are subject to consent. Where there is no jury trial facilitated by the court and no consent given by the man then there is a legitimate challenge that orders of the court are void.
· The denial of a jury trial is bias.
· No contempt of court can be claimed to exist where no jurisdiction exists… and where no order has been breached because the order is void.
· If the court does not have jurisdiction… on subject matter… then its order is void… and ignoring those orders is therefore not a contempt of the court.
· Any denial of due process would warrant a claim of a void order.
· The threat of force is coercion:
· THE JUDGE may take it upon himself to engage force to demonstrate his unproven authority… this would be deemed a criminal act in the eyes of the man - the man reserves the right to use all lawful means to defend his rights, freedoms and liberties… and he reserves the right to pursue justice beyond the court system if this fails in its duty to preserve impartiality.
· The people’s authority must prevail – through the rule of law – not the rule-of-force.
· If the ‘High Court’ threatens us with violence to secure its claimed authority – we have no option but to concede under duress. But there should be no doubt about the dynamics of the situation thus created. Our concession should not be construed as an act of weakness – we will be pragmatic in the face of adversity – and bide our time.
The people of Britain have a right to rebel against arbitrary and unjust governance… that this exists is demonstrable. The Lawful Rebellion movement gathers momentum and the underlying demand is that the government and the judiciary respect our common law right of which Magna Carta is a foundation.
Where the judiciary will not recognise Magna Carta… we will not recognise them.
The ball is in the court. What game shall we play?
The Real issue-
The real purpose of the harassment claim – it is an attempt to gag.
The man has claimed that ‘in his view’ one of the partners, also a plaintiff - Hugh Jones - is a crook who has stolen his mother’s money.
He has called on the partners in Pannones to investigate and provide a thorough and transparent investigation… which they have refused to do. Pannones defer their responsibility to an external body… the secretive ‘Court of Protection’ which according to the accounts of many… is protecting criminality, not vulnerable people.
The man has good cause to claim that there is collusion between Hugh Jones, the Court of Protection and their ombudsman… again these impressive sounding ‘bodies’ of so called authority are always represented by a single individual, all of whom hail from the same profession… the opportunity for collusion and corruption is not unimaginable… and hence why the man has pursued the common law process of a commercial lien.
The man has a lawfully obtained and fully perfected commercial lien against the Pannone Partners to the value of Nine Million pounds. The man has every right to pursue payment of this debt and no court has the right to deny this.
Another single member of the legal profession (a judge) tried to declare this illegal… which is fine because the commercial lien process claims no ‘legal’ status… it is entirely an animal of the common law process and is thus ‘lawful’ and derives it legitimacy through common law and irrefutable logic.
It is telling that Pannones have done everything in their power to avoid the simple process of an internal inquiry into the allegations of corruption of one of their partners… it raises serious questions as to WHY? What have they got to hide.
Pannones get their business from the Court of Protection… the Court of Protection have appointed Hugh Jones… and the Court of Protection cannot be investigated. Hugh Jones and Pannones could ‘thank’ the Court of Protection and nobody would know…. The ‘set-up’ is protected… this is probably why it is called the Court of Protection
Pannones are desperate to gag the man… using the harassment Act and the man is determined to expose the alleged corruption, using the pressure of persistence – because there is no remedy in the legal system.
The man has a duty to prevent crime when he sees it happening… and this is precisely what he is doing.
The man has declared war on Pannones… despite all the pressure he has brought to bear, they have still not investigated Hugh Jones – ONE HAS TO ASK – WHY?
On the balance of probability… it seems that there is more to Pannone’s refusal to provide a proper and meaningful explanation of where the man’s mother’s money has gone… in their robustness to avoid answering some simple questions Pannones have preferred to subjected themselves to a ‘sustained pressure’ to expose the truth.
Pannones would obviously like the pressure to stop… and it is so easily achieved. Provide the answers re the alleged corruption by Hugh Jones and the problem will disappear.
Sustained pressure… is not harassment. It is a legitimate method to prevent crime when the ‘appropriate bodies’ refuse to do so.
The Great Irony.
One of the plaintiffs in this matter a Mr Paul Jonson –titles himself as HEAD OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONS - an offer was made to Paul Jonson for mediation in an attempt to ‘resolve’ the matter – which was declined by him.
It seems that the Pannones crew are a strange bunch - simple not what they claim to be… with a resolutions department that avoids resolution and a protection department allegedly not protecting - and with some very important issues about alleged corruption in their ranks to still to address.
The claim of harassment is a gagging ploy.
The exposure of Pannones as a direct consequence of the man’s probing may reveal that there is more to this than meets the eye. We should applaud the man for his persistence – and condemn Pannones for their evasion of the truth.T
Pannones had the choice of going the very easy route - by providing transparency and answers to easy questions… or the enormously hard route of prevarication and dodging the issue - subjecting themselves to a barrage of pressure (all is fair in love and war… and it is Pannones after all who declared war on the man).
Why did they choose the hard route if they had nothing to hide?
This issue is not going to go away… Pannones need to face up to the reality that they will either settle this matter by resolution or they are going to spend the next few years fighting more claims… the commercial lien of nine million pounds is lawfully enforceable… no Statute judge has the authority to defeat a common law process. They are acting beyond their authority – probably due to ignorance.
The man has made a statutory declaration that he is NOT the legal fiction Michael Clarke.
The court order that MICHAEL CLARKE appear – has been complied with.
The order if it is claimed to be against the man – is void.
Anyone got a friend who works for a National paper.
Subject: The silent majority
This letter says it all......
Subject: The silent majority
Its sad but true, It is difficult not to agree with the 72 year old man who wrote this letter, I notice there isnt a reply.
This is one of the best letters I have read for a long time, it puts it ALL into perspective. PLEASE PASS IT ON to everyone you can, its time BOTH parties stood up and listened.
This is our country and its being destroyed.
To David Cameron (Prime Minister) & Ed Milliband (Leader of the Opposition) ...
You BOTH Worry me ! ( In fact both of your Political parties worry the hell out of me !!!)
Over the last three years, I find myself becoming more and more fearful of the pair of you, and between you, you are turning this country into a place that I no longer feel at home in, or feel a part of! I watch you in parliament, and no, not just the two of you, but every politician that I see, stand up in parliament sneering at each other, and acting like children !!! (..and if you were my children, I would be ashamed of you all ... What an example to set!)
Although you would like us all to believe that you are putting the needs of this country at the forefront, NEITHER of you are doing that, you seem more interested in "one-up-manship ", in scoring off each other, & denigrating each other, to the detriment of this country & its people !!! It seems to be all about YOU as individuals, and not about what you can DO for this country !
It is fast becoming a place that I do not recognize, as the place I always thought, was the best place in the world to be !!! But no longer !!!
You are not listening to the people of this country !!!
I am watching the deterioration of living standards in this country, (and according to you, on a world stage we are doing better than most countries ... REALLY ???) ... And yet the gap is widening between the "haves" and the "have-nots" . I see our homeless on the streets, our hospitals under-funded, and understaffed, our health system is an absolute mess and a disgrace .. And yet I see multi-millions of dollars being sent offshore, in aid to other countries, before attending to this country's needs !
I see the "selling off of water rights to foreign interests, WHY...? Especially when you go to great lengths to tell us that water is a finite resource, & supposedly, we must ALL be careful with how we use it, so that we ensure we have it for the future ? A Carbon Tax,( which you KNOW is just another tax ) which will make NO appreciable difference, to carbon emissions, AT ALL!
A tax, which in spite of all your arguments FOR it, you are doing alone, when other major countries will NOT & DO NOT embrace it, or believe in it !
All that it will do for this country is put working families and small businesses behind the eight ball, .....what planet are you on, if you think that the tax we must pay will make even a scrap of difference to the effect of the carbon tax on people? Anyone can see the holes in that argument !!! Do you really think we are that dumb ???
Let's talk about Multiculturalism .....People have come here from other countries, for a better life, for more years than I have been alive ( I am 72 years old !)
Pre & Post war immigrants came for a better life, and settled in and became wonderful contributors to this country, ... All have contributed to the rich diversity of this country, and some descendants have even fought FOR this country, and they have become U.K.citizens and were glad to be ..and they had NO handouts from our Government either, ...they worked hard for everything!
I have never before had a problem with all, or any, race of immigrants coming here. However, I DO NOW !!!
Please tell me why we have areas in towns and on large estates all over the country, where police do NOT, & will NOT go, for fear of their life ?
Please tell me why we can no longer have religion in schools for fear of "OFFENDING" someone ? (The latest little gem is that they are not having or being funded, for chaplains any more, but Counsellors!)
Please tell me why religious Christmas observances are no longer allowed in some schools for fear of OFFENDING someone ? Please tell me HOW Christmas decorations in some stores might OFFEND someone ? Please tell me why we have to have segregated days in some swimming centres for fear of "OFFENDING" someone ? Please tell me why we have some RADICAL clerics demanding Sharia Law in this country when if we were in THEIR country, this would NEVER be allowed? Please tell me why our laws need to be changed, so as not to OFFEND someone ? Please tell me why we are fast becoming a MINORITY voice, in our own country, because of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS ? Please tell me WHY Britons cannot legally wear a bike helmet covering their head in a bank and yet it is ok to wear a Burqa which covers the whole of the face ? And please tell me WHY, when those people who want asylum here can wreck our detention centres and STILL be accepted here ?
What does that say about just who and what are this government's priorities ?
The British people that I speak to have genuine concerns about becoming a second class minority in our own country, and the reasons for it are some of the above. Are you so blind that you cannot see this ? And no, I am NOT racist !!! If I did not like Catholics or Protestants would I be considered racist ? Of course not!
Why is it, that if we object to what is happening in our country we are immediately labelled RACIST, in an attempt to shut us up ?
We are fighting Radical Muslims in Afghanistan , are we not ? I hear you say, yes but the Muslims we have here are "Not like that " . Well how would we know ? Do we hear ANY of them coming out & speaking AGAINST radicals ? I haven't, have you ? Islam is not compatible with ANY of the values that we hold here in Britain ! Are not the experiences of France and the Netherlands a examples of that? Why do you think it would be any different here ? We even have a British born "radical ", whose message is that Britain WILL become a Muslim country, under Sharia Law, & that we had "better get used to it ".
Will both of you grow some "balls", and start sticking up for this country and its people ? We are the people who put you where you are and PAY you to look after our interests ! And you are NOT doing that by any stretch of the imagination !!! I would appreciate an answer from both of you, if only to convince me that once again I am not talking to a brick wall !
In case it has escaped both of you I would like to remind you that, in the U.K. Government is FOR THE PEOPLE ... OF THE PEOPLE ... & BY THE PEOPLE ... Never forget that because you sure have up till now !
Let us get this out to all - please keep forwarding and if you have people in the press or if you know Politicians - let them know we are dis-satisfied with their behaviour !
PLEASE SEND THIS GREAT LETTER TO AS MANY PEOPLE IN THE U.K. AS YOU CAN, AND IF YOU HAVE CONTACTS OVERSEAS DO THE SAME.
THE British Constitution Group
With the exception of a few thousand very powerful people, the entire world’s population, all seven billion of us, are trapped ... trapped into a criminal debt creating banking ‘system’ that has taken hundreds of years to perfect and to come to fruition. This ‘system’ results in enslavement and servitude. It creates dreadful unhappiness amongst ordinary decent people and causes wars, debt, starvation, pollution and environmental destruction. It feeds on greed, fear and division. It forces people onto the corporate treadmills of mass mindless production and mass mindless consumption. It uses lies, deception, intimidation and entrapment at all times. It is a system that is so clever and so cunning that most of the world is completely oblivious to its existence. It is a system that allows a few winners at the expense of a huge number of losers. It is a system that considers itself to be unbeatable and indestructible and is now so arrogant that it believes it can control everything and everyone on its terms. It is a system where psychopaths and sociopaths can flourish. And without question the centre of this system, the heart of this global corporate beast is the innocent sounding Square Mile known as the City of London.
Put very simply, the banking dynasties, such as the House of Rothschild, control the political processes around the world to such an extent that their network of private central banks have the right to create money completely out of thin air and then charge interest on that ‘nothingness’. The polite term is ‘Fractional Reserve Lending’ but in reality it is just simple fraud. The result is that the whole world is currently drowning in a sea of fraudulent debt.
The USA now has a National Debt of over 16 trillion dollars, whilst the UK owes its creditors over one trillion pounds. The planned contagion of spiralling and unlawful debt is now sweeping over Europe with a renewed vigour. Greece and Spain are being torn apart by appalling austerity measures to the point that civil war or military intervention are now being openly talked about on the streets. Italy is giving all the signs that its economy is now entering into very stormy waters indeed. Ireland, Portugal, France and Belgium are already in a mess and are unlikely to see their debts become more manageable. Tens of millions of people have experienced a major downturn in their quality of life, along with their prospects for a more secure and better future, as unlawful austerity measures brought in by corrupt politicians begin to bite. Even the stronger economies of Germany, The Netherlands and Luxembourg have now been downgraded by Moody’s, the Rothschild controlled credit rating agency.
A Simple Solution To End This Madness – The Greenback:
What is happening to all of us is criminal. However, there is a very simple solution that the banking dynasties do not want you to know about.
At the height of the American Civil War, the US Treasury warned President Lincoln that further funding would be needed if the Federal North was to have the resources needed to defeat the Confederate South. The President initially went to the Rothschilds and the private banks who wanted between 24 and 36 per cent interest. Lincoln knew that if he agreed to take loans from the bankers that he would be putting his country into a debt noose that would strangle the economic prosperity out of his country and which would be almost impossible to pay off.
On the advice of a businessman with proven integrity, Colonel Dick Taylor from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln made the decision to print debt-free and interest-free paper money based on nothing more than the honour of the American Government. Called ‘Greenbacks’ because they were coloured green on one side only, the US Treasury issued 450 million dollars worth of these notes and they were immediately accepted as legal tender by a willing and grateful nation. The war was eventually won and this very popular new paper currency seemed set to continue. In the words of Lincoln himself:
"The government should create issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers..... The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power
Senate document 23, Page 91. 1865
However, the response by the private bankers to this sudden threat to their banking empire was swift and brutal as this extract from The Times of London in 1865 shows:
" If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedence in the history of the civilised governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."
On Good Friday, April 14th 1865, a lone gunman ended the presidency of Abraham Lincoln. Sadly, his Greenback legacy died with him as the private bankers managed to ‘persuade’ Congress to revoke this successful initiative in favour of the debt creating National Banking Act which eventually led to the formation of the privately run Federal Reserve in 1913. Since then, America’s unlawful debt has risen to over 16 trillion dollars.
"I have two enemies; the Southern army in front of me and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in the rear is my greatest foe." Abraham Lincoln
The solution for dealing with private debt-creating bankers is simple. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to stop any sovereign government from issuing through its treasury its own interest-free money based on nothing more than the wealth and integrity of the nation. This is the big secret that the City of London would rather keep to itself. If this simple fact were to become mainstream then people everywhere would simply walk away and the entire banking system would completely collapse.
And now we come to a very little known historical episode that I alluded to at the beginning that takes this concept of the debt-free ‘Greenback’ from America to Britain ... and in so doing exposes the truly appalling values that are prevalent even today within the City of London.
The Great War And The Debt-free Bradbury Treasury Note:
Three weeks ago, as part of my ongoing research into the banking elite, I came across a fascinating book entitled The Financiers and the Nation by the Rt. Hon. Thomas Johnston, P.C., ex-Lord Privy Seal. It was written in 1934 and republished in 1994 by Ossian Publishers Ltd.
The text of this quite remarkable and rare book is available here.
In Chapter 6, entitled ‘Usury on the Great War’, I’ve selected the following paragraphs which I believe are both shocking and self-explanatory:
WHEN the whistle blew for the start of the Great War in August 1914 the Bank of England possessed only nine millions sterling of a gold reserve, and, as the Bank of England was the Bankers' Bank, this sum constituted the effective reserve of all the other Banking Institutions in Great Britain.
The bank managers at the outbreak of War were seriously afraid that the depositing public, in a panic, would demand the return of their money. And, inasmuch as the deposits and savings left in the hands of the bankers by the depositing public had very largely been sunk by the bankers in enterprises which, at the best, could not repay the borrowed capital quickly, and which in several and large-scale instances were likely to be submerged altogether in the stress of war and in the collapse of great areas of international trade, it followed that if there were a widespread panicky run upon the banks, the banks would be unable to pay and the whole credit system would collapse, to the ruin of millions of people.
Private enterprise banking thus being on the verge of collapse, the Government (Mr. Lloyd George at the time was Chancellor of the Exchequer) hurriedly declared a moratorium, i.e. it authorized the banks not to pay out (which in any event the banks could not do), and it extended the August Bank Holiday for another three days. During these three or four days when the banks and stock exchanges were closed, the bankers held anxious negotiation with the Chancellor of the Exchequer. And one of them has placed upon record the fact that 'he (Mr. George) did everything that we asked him to do.' When the banks reopened, the public discovered that, instead of getting their money back in gold, they were paid in a new legal tender of Treasury notes (the £1 notes in black and the 10s. notes in red colours). This new currency had been issued by the State, was backed by the credit of the State, and was issued to the banks to prevent the banks from utter collapse. The public cheerfully accepted the new notes; and nobody talked about inflation.
To return, however, to the early war period, no sooner had Mr. Lloyd George got the bankers out of their difficulties in the autumn of 1914 by the issue of the Treasury money, than they were round again at the Treasury door explaining forcibly that the State must, upon no account, issue any more money on this interest free basis; if the war was to be run, it must be run with borrowed money, money upon which interest must be paid, and they were the gentlemen who would see to the proper financing of a good, juicy War Loan at 31/2 per cent, interest, and to that last proposition the Treasury yielded. The War was not to be fought with interest-free money, and/or/with conscription of wealth; though it was to be fought with conscription of life. Many small businesses were to be closed and their proprietors sent overseas as redundant, and without any compensation for their losses, while Finance, as we shall see, was to be heavily and progressively remunerated
Emergency Bradbury Treasury Notes (printed only on one side)
The real values of the private bankers and the City of London have been exposed for all to see. Whilst hundreds of thousands of British soldiers were dying on the killing fields of Flanders and elsewhere doing what they saw as their patriotic duty, British bankers, safely out of danger and not sharing the appalling conditions on the Western Front, were only interested in one thing – how to make obscene profits from Britain’s desperate efforts to win the war. To say that the private bankers and the City of London have the morals of sewer rats is to be extremely unkind to our little rodent friends. But this is the clincher. As a direct result of the greed and treason of the British private bankers in preventing the continuance of the Bradbury Treasury Notes, Britain’s National Debt went up from £650 million in 1914 to a staggering £7,500 million in 1919.
And this is where it all gets particularly interesting. The following is an extract from the official and current HM Treasury’s Debt Management Office website ... and it appears to be completely at odds with the account given by the Rt. Hon. Thomas Johnston.
"The threat of World War One pushed British banks into crisis; exacerbated further as half the world's trade was financed by British banks and as a consequence international payments dried up. In response to this crisis, John Maynard Keynes (the renowned economist), persuaded the Chancellor Lloyd George to use the Bank of England's gold reserves to support the banks, which ended the immediate crisis. Keynes stayed with the Treasury until 1919. The war years of 1914-18 had seen an increase in the National Debt from £650 million at the start of the war to £7,500 million by 1919. This ensured that the Treasury developed new expertise in foreign exchange, currency, credit and price control skills and were put to use in the management of the post-war economy. The slump of the 1930s necessitated the restructuring of the economy following World War II (the national debt stood at £21 billion by its end) and the emphasis was placed on economic planning and financial relations.
Why is there is no mention whatsoever of the £300 million of Bradbury debt-free paper Treasury Notes issued in 1914? Instead, it says Lloyd George, on the advice of John Maynard Keynes, used the Bank of England’s gold reserves which, according to Johnston, only amounted to £9 million. What is going on here? Who is telling the truth? Could it be that HM Government, the puppets of the City of London, don’t want you to know about the simple but effective concept of debt-free and interest-free Treasury Notes?
What Do The System-serving Politicians And "Economists" Say About The issuance Of Treasury Notes?
As soon as the concept of the debt-free and interest-free Greenback Dollar (and now the Bradbury Pound) is raised in polite conversation with either a politician or an economist, two immediate knee jerk verbal reactions occur from these system-servers.
The first is to say that if a government suddenly starts printing its own money through its treasury based on the credit and wealth of the country, instead of going through its central bank, we would be heading towards what happened in the Weimar Republic in Germany in the early 1920s where hyperinflation spiralled out of control and a loaf of bread was bought with a barrow load of almost worthless paper money.
To this I just say look again at what actually happened in Germany at that time. It was not the Weimar’s treasury but it was the privately controlled central bank, the Reichsbank, who was printing the money, coupled with the extreme actions of currency speculators and foreign investors that caused all of the problems.
Hyperinflation could not happen as a result of the Bradbury Pound, because the democratically elected government would actually ‘govern’ ... now that is novel! Speculation would be prevented, and most importantly, the newly created money would be spent on a productive economy, rather than bankers bonuses.
The second reaction from system-servers is that the country is already printing its own money – it is called Quantative Easing, that mysterious cash injection into the economy which only seems to get as far as the banks and not to where it is actually needed. Only trouble is, it is the Bank of England doing the printing and not HM Treasury. Based around government issued Bonds (promissory notes based on the wealth of the nation), this complex process only increases the National Debt and it certainly doesn’t solve anything.
The simple truth is that people who serve the system and who have been ‘educated’ by such organisations as the Fabian inspired London School of Economics (LSE), are not suddenly going to bite the hand that gives them a very good living.
So what does all of this mean for us, the people?
Before looking at this, let’s just consider for a moment what ‘money’ actually is. It is simply a convenient unit of exchange for goods and services that people have COMPLETE CONFIDENCE in. Now if HM Government were to issue debt-free and interest-free treasury notes through HM Treasury rather than the Bank of England in order to meet the needs and happiness of all the people whilst getting them out of unlawful debt, my guess is that people might have a lot of confidence in such a benign and benevolent financial system.
There is absolutely no defence for the present system whereby private bankers create money completely out of thin air for themselves to lend and then charge interest on that ‘nothingness’. The Bank of England, with its hidden controller the Bank for International Settlements based in Basel, Switzerland (often described as the Central Bank of Central Banks), dictate behind the scenes the fiscal policies and direction that our supposed sovereign and independent government must take. We are all prisoners of this utterly corrupt system and it’s time to confront it head on to collapse it.
If our government were to go down the path of a new Bradbury Treasury Note (as well as pursuing the banksters with Common Law for their crimes against humanity) then our debt burden would be removed overnight – there would be no deficit and no national debt. Under Common Law, all debts involving the use of fractional reserve lending by the central and private banks will be written off as they were arrived at by the use of fraud. Money would be immediately made available by HM Treasury to meet the essential needs of the country. The nation’s happiness, well-being and security would be taken care of without the need for an invasive and complex tax system. We would have Gross Domestic Happiness instead of Gross Domestic Product dictating humanity’s future.
None of this is rocket science – if the Spanish and Greek governments genuinely wanted to put right overnight the economic woes of their countries, they would immediately start printing and supplying interest-free and debt-free treasury notes based on the wealth and integrity of their respective countries. They would also tell the IMF, the EU and the Bank for International Settlements to go and whistle for their ‘money’! Why? Because it was created out of thin air, it didn’t exist in the first place, and the whole banking system is fraudulent ... in other words, see you in a common law court in front of a jury!!!!
Banks, money and finance must exist to serve humanity, not the other way round. Our enslavement by unlawful debt can be ended overnight with one signature by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It really is that simple!
30.06.2013 THE STATE OF BRITAIN
The People Vs The Government, DWP and Atos
a FRIEND had to walk past the city magistrates court & there is a queue of about at least 300 people all queuing for non payment of council tax OMG if I could take a photo (I won't to protect people's identity) you would never believe how many people there is. Kids are crying, people are getting stressed waiting & the queue goes round the block. Welcome to Tory Britain 2013
There was a guy telling everyone about there rights outside the court & handing out a leaflet it said the following: 'this is retrospective action against me & the aforementioned bill is not be finalised before march 2014. This action is a waste of the courts time, the peoples time & more importantly the peoples money. I urge you to dismiss this case'.
Does anyone know what this means? Some solicitors in the queue also stated that they DO NOT have to pay something that is not yet law!
Oh & a friend that was there said that when all those hundreds finally got in the doors they was told they didn't even have to attend court even though they'd all got letters to say they had to go & they was all told to go to the council tax dept instead to make payment arrangements!
An elderly, frail couple were charged a swingeing £44,400 by lawyers who handled their simple finances for four years when they were no longer capable of looking after themselves.
Feliks and Rosemary Zakrzewski
Overcharged: Feliks and Rosemary Zakrzewski
Their case exposes a gaping loophole in the legal system, which leaves the elderly at the mercy of greedy solicitors who, relatives fear, can charge what they liked, while the family is powerless to intervene.
Feliks and Rosemary Zakrzewski developed Alzheimer's disease in 2005. They went to live with their daughter Antoinette Tricker and her family in Suffolk.
But because there was no Power of Attorney set up allowing her to act for them, the Court of Protection appointed a solicitor as their receiver to take charge of their financial affairs.
The family was then helpless because the solicitor is answerable only to their client - in this case, a couple with Alzheimer's - who did not understand what was happening.
There are 22,000 deputies (the new name for receivers) looking after the affairs of those who lack the mental capacity to act for themselves.
They don't have to be solicitors; they can be family members, friends or the local authority.
In the Zakrzewskis' case, the solicitor's first act was to take away their savings book, leaving them with only £100 each as spending money for four months.
Mrs Tricker, 58, says: 'The loss of independence nearly drove my father over the edge. He took to offering his asthma nebuliser to passing strangers to raise cash.'
Meanwhile, for handling their simple affairs, the solicitor ran up charges of nearly £19,000 in just ten months, charging £200 an hour, while giving Mrs Tricker just £70 a week to pay for her parents' living costs. All they had were their savings and a flat in Dorset to sell.
Guidance on Court of Protection costs states that general management costs are 'unlikely to exceed' £3,000 a year. Since Mrs Tricker was not the client, her complaints to the solicitor and requests to see the bill could be ignored, while her parents' estate was being drained.
'After ten months, I had to beg the Office of the Public Guardian, which oversees receivers, to intervene,' she says.
A new solicitor was appointed as the receiver in 2006, bringing the final total to £44,400.
Her father died in 2007 aged 88 and her mother died last year aged 89. Although families can complain to the Court of Protection if they feel someone is abusing their powers, it is difficult to gather evidence without access to bills and bank statements.
Caroline Bielanska, chairman of Solicitors for the Elderly, says: 'Without evidence, the only way is to go to the Office of the Public Guardian. They do an immediate risk-assessment to work out if there is cause for complaint and then examine the case. The majority of complaints arise because of sibling rivalry.'
Deputies' bills are assessed by the Supreme Court Costs Office. Mrs Tricker finally received a copy of her parents' bills from the court last month.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice, which oversees the Court of Protection, says: ' Anyone appointed to look after the affairs of a person who lacks capacity must always act in their best interests, and put their needs first and foremost.
'Since the Mental Capacity Act came into force in 2007, all deputies are supervised by the Office of the Public Guardian and must follow a comprehensive code of practice, which provides guidance on how to act and make decisions on behalf of people who lack capacity.'
It costs more than £1,000 to have a deputy appointed, plus an annual charge for a security bond which can run into thousands.
To avoid this route, you should draw up a Lasting Power of Attorney stating who you want to run your affairs if you become unable to handle them.
There are two types: one for your finances and the other for your health and welfare.
They cost £120 each and can't be used until they have been registered by the Office of the Public Guardian. The lengthy forms are complicated and readers have told us about long delays in processing them.
Before October 2007, a simpler Enduring Power of Attorney was used. These are still valid.
'Dementia can strike at any time. Plan ahead and get a Lasting Power of Attorney before you, too, are sucked into this costly world,' says Mrs Tricker.
Having reviewed the bill, Mrs Tricker has asked the court to rescind and reassess the first solicitor's costs. The hearing is set for June 3.
Under the Fraud Act 2006. Section 2 of the Act specifically states:
2 Fraud by false representation
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and
(b) intends, by making the representation—
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2) A representation is false if—
(a) it is untrue or misleading, and
(b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.
(3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—
(a) the person making the representation, or
(b) any other person.
(4) A representation may be express or implied.
(5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).
3 Fraud by failing to disclose information
A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose, and
(b) intends, by failing to disclose the information—
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
4 Fraud by abuse of position
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person,
(b) dishonestly abuses that position, and
(c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position—
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2) A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.
Warning to Government
This is not a request that requires an answer, it does however require a response – by way of action on your part that demonstrates that you understand its substance and the seriousness of our intent.
The national collective political establishment has betrayed the ‘People’ by hijacking our sovereignty and engaging in criminal activities in a subservient role to a foreign power without our consent. This is in defiance of our constitution and an act of treason.
You do not need to know how many people we represent today, only how many we might represent tomorrow and you should know that our numbers grow daily. This letter thus serves as your window of opportunity to make amends and give remedy for the crimes committed against us. We will show compassion for those who recant and we will be ruthless with those who do not concede to the wishes of the people.
Ignoring this letter is not an option… if you think it is, then this serves only to demonstrate that your intellect is subservient to your arrogance. You may feel that you can ignore it because you are too powerful, but to do so is to underestimate the seething resentment that the people feel for the political establishment in general.
You have acted in contempt of the principles of democracy and shown total disregard for our right to govern ourselves.
For the past several decades the ‘People’ have been treated with extraordinary and total contempt by the collective political establishment. It has not mattered which political party has been in office or “power” as you insist on calling it, nothing ever changes. We are continually subjected to the same global agenda. We have been used and abused like pawns in your game of supremacy in which a dynastic ruling class see themselves as ordained to rule as masters – with impunity, whilst we the people, as virtual slaves, are supposedly destined to obey – without question. You have persistently and consistently undermined our democracy by agreeing to treaties with foreign political elites who have no business in our affairs.
You have rewarded yourselves with the trappings of office – high salaries, luxuries denied most of us, privileges, bonuses, pensions, prestige and benefits that we can only dream of… whilst burdening us with ever-higher taxes, derisory pensions and declining standards of public services. It is we who pay the price for your malfeasance.
The story of our ‘People’ over the past several decades that will be told in the history books of tomorrow is the story of betrayal, greed, corruption, nepotism, treason and modern-day fascism – the latter of which manifests itself in the global agenda being imposed upon us against our will.
The United Nations – a step process towards TOTAL global governance is now fully exposed. Built on lies and deceit is being hoisted by its own petard – the edifice is crumbling but still the political elite like demented fools, continue to feed on their own delusions. The docile masses, mesmerized by trivia, propaganda, complacency and ignorance have still somehow managed to grasp some basic elements of the truth, alerted almost certainly by the blatant and arrogant refusal of the political elite to tell the truth even when it stands proud in the rubble of political deceit and betrayal.
The political classes are discredited at every level. They rant about the benefits of our subjugation to a foreign enterprise, peace, prosperity and democracy where in reality chaos, dictatorship and corruption reign supreme. Western economies are on the brink of collapse because of the corrupt banking cartels, there is visible resistance on the streets and people call for lawful rebellion. But less known, there is clandestine resistance behind closed doors. Whilst the majorities advocate a peaceful uprising, the extremes will always be in the mix and when passion and anger are fused and those aggrieved can find no remedy… violent resistance is as understandable as the passion for life itself.
The police and militia that you currently rely on to defend yourselves against the people’s retribution… are made up of our own, they are not your people – and when they learn about your betrayal and your intent… AND THEY WILL – they will turn against you. Their awakening, which you cannot stop, is your Achilles heel. Your greatest fear must be that we will impose upon you the regimes and repression that you had planned for us.
People are meeting in groups across the country, talking across oceans… they are disparate, disorganized and without an effective plan to repel the global agenda…as yet. BUT a leadership is emerging… organizers are coordinating and small groups are linking to form larger groups. The dichotomies of left v right, Christian v Muslim, black v white, Catholic v Protestant, which have been used to great effect to divide and conquer in the past, will find no favour in this war. The call to arms that will unite us will be ‘the people v the global elite’ – the cry will cascade street to street and find easy passage and universal support – for our common purpose has greater value and strength than yours.
We have a constitution – which you ignore. We have been denied our democratic rights, regardless, we have clearly expressed our wishes, in one opinion poll after another, that we do not want to be governed by a foreign un-elected officialdom, but still you disregard us. We are promised a referendum on our future, but then you ignore the results or recant. You speak in support of our views when in opposition, but act to the contrary when we elect you.
You consult with corporate executives, international bankers, non-government organizations, international charities, academia, foreign dignitaries, political elites, think tanks and lobbyist – collectively a tiny minority, who do not represent us. These groups all emanate from the same social strata, with their own agendas to satisfy and all funded by the same cartel. You take note of their every whim, but you care not a jot for what we think or what we want. Your children are given jobs, with big salaries fresh from university and then rapidly climb the corporate ladder as a reward by the same corporate bodies who you have favoured with your decisions. Our children must make their own way in an increasingly desperate world. Your corporatism suppresses our freedoms with deliberate and malicious intent.
You accommodate tyrants, dictators, arms dealers and all manner of dubious characters, with whom you are happy to keep company. You turn a blind eye when the smell of money wafts your nostrils… it suppresses the stink of corruption and evil. Your moral compasses are defunct… your values deplorable and motives despicable. Our soldiers die to service your corporate agenda – their blood is on your hands.
You are educated at the same elite schools and members of the same elite clubs and you allow these influences to override the consideration which should be paramount in service of the people. You have adopted the “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” philosophy… because you have learnt from your predecessors that corruption and deception do indeed pay. The United Nations Security Council is awash with it and you have determined to get your snout in the same trough. You take comfort from the fact that you control those who have the authority to indict you for your criminality… because they too have fallen prey to the corruption. You have sold off our national resources to your friends, divided communities, deprived villages and towns, undermined, destroyed and bulldozed indigenous communities. You have laid waste where once prosperity was enjoyed. But you have not suffered… you have remained aloof, disengaged, uninvolved – removed from the debris and the misery that you have wreaked upon the rest of us.
Our farms no longer feed us with the nutrients we require to sustain healthy lives, crippled by regulations, supranational mining contracts made to favour foreign farmers or ‘Coal Seam Gas Fracking’ that is destroying the once fertile soils of our landscape. Our armed forces are forced to commit crimes against humanity by the requirement to adhere to the unlawful and communist manifesto of the United Nations Charter and we see foreign troops being trained on our own soil on the pretence that they may be needed to protect us… when the reality is they are being trained to subdue us… to protect you from our vengeance. Our children are victims of social engineering in the schools and declining standards of education. They are being sexualized by explicit exposures before they have the emotional maturity to be able to cope. You are destroying their minds and their childhoods.
You have engineered a police state with legislation that empowers you at our expense and you have been blatant in your contempt for our democratic and constitution rights and our common law, which have been known to us for centuries. You deny us our rights and our freedoms and contemptuously imply that you can provide us with a Bill of Rights. Would we seriously trust a thief with our wallets? You have corrupted our courts by appointing judges who are contemptuous of our common law and installed a law society that disperses Maritime/Admiralty Law through the peoples courts .
You have dissected our nation and sold off our infrastructure. We are forced to buy our own water from foreign corporations which grow rich on the back of our suffering. You are then rewarded by them with lucrative directorships when you slip quietly from office with your bulging pensions. You remain oblivious, unconcerned… disconnected. We will no longer be ignored as you go about your globalist agenda. We will resist your controlling and petty rules and regulations… we will resist your fines and penalty charges and challenge your corrupt and biased judges, we will defy the over-zealous police, and your oppressive and unlawful taxes.
It is our intention to govern ourselves… we do not seek your permission – this is our right. You have had your opportunity and you have failed. We will take control of our own lives in stages, as and when it suits us. Our numbers will grow as we show by example that prosperity is the natural consequence of honest and fair governance. We will expose you for the parasites you are.
This country has a constitution – which you ignore. We have Magna Carta, we have trial by jury and habeas corpus. We have our customs, traditions and common law. We have the right of petition, free speech, and free movement and above all… we have the right to govern ourselves. These are our inalienable rights – they are not privileges granted to us by you or your ilk. They cannot be taken away or extinguished at the whim of political diktat or through corrupt judicial process and certainly not at the behest of foreign undemocratic institutions. You have no authority to dictate… your duty is to serve.
We are a sovereign nation… a proud people. We have watched our country slowly destroyed… by you – we now see clearly what you have done… your purpose and your betrayal. We will honour our inheritance – the freedoms fought for and secured for us, and we will ensure that we will pass this on to the next generation, to our children and theirs.
You have been sent this letter by a constituent. On sending a copy to you, they have also registered your name with our coordinators. This will remain with us as evidence for your trial… for treason, when necessary. It’s your choice.
We The People - WE ARE SOVEREIGN
The two richest most evil families in the world are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Join us below and please like our page and share. facebook.com/KilluminatiSoldiersII They control the central banks of the world, the finance and supply both sides of all wars and control the finances of the Vatican and Occult. Rock-a-fella records artist Jay Z says he is in the la familia and long live the king. What he means by the la familia is that he is a Rockefeller puppet and made man inside of the Vatican controlled SINdicate. The roman priests that killed Christ are still the priests in Rome and the money changing families, kings, queens and pharaohs of the past have brought down their bloodlines and most are intermarried into these families. The Rockefeller Family Fortunes http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Illuminati/rockefeller_fortunes.htm Murder by Injection- The Rockefeller Syndicate http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/emullins.htm The Creature From Jekyll Island http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/Federal%20Reserve%20Scam/jekyll_island.htm Standard Oil and the Rise of Hitler http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ The Bush Family and the Rockefellers http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/ How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women http://www.savethemales.ca/001904.html The Rothschilds and Rockefellers Join Forces in Multi-Billion Dollar Deal http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-rothschilds-and-rockefellers-join-forces-in-multi-billion-dollar-deal/ The Rothschilds Exposed 1/3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F4IGwuKdUQ The Rothschilds Exposed 2/3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2Yjoi2_5pw The Rothschilds Exposed 3/3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47WM2BhklmM The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, as is documented in the following timeline. However, before you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be. The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people. You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia. So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews. The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following which would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews: "I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family. As you will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position through lies, manipulation and murder. Their bloodline also extends into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names: Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn. However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about. You are probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country, which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere. There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that deceptive tradition. Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly that they can put into positions of power when required. This started with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret sixth son. Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish. Please, therefore, do not automatically assume someone you see with the name Rothschild or any of the names listed above are part of the Rothschild criminal network. Furthermore and most importantly, the majority of Ashkenazi Jews are innocent and not part of this network. Check the facts out for yourself first, this article is designed to inform people who the enemy is, not single out people of a particular race or people with a particular surname, who may have nothing to do with this Rothschild criminal network. 1743: Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house. Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram (which geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666) which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later. 1753: Gutle Schnaper, an Ashkenazi Jew (future wife of Mayer Amschel Bauer), born to respected merchant, Wolf Salomon Schnaper. 1760: During this decade Mayer Amschel Bauer works for a bank owned by the Oppenheimers' in Hanover, Germany. He is highly successful and becomes a junior partner. Whilst working at the bank he becomes acquainted with General von Estorff. Following his father's death, Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take over his father's business. Bauer recognises the significance of the red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door ("Rot," is German for, "Red," "Schild," is German for, "Sign"). Now Mayer Amschel Rothschild, he discovers that General von Estorff is now attached to the court of Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, one of the richest royal houses in Europe, which gained its' wealth by the hiring out of Hessian soldiers to foreign countries for vast profits (a practice that continues today in the form of exporting, "peacekeeping," troops throughout the world). He therefore makes the General's re-acquaintance on the pretext of selling him valuable coins and trinkets at discounted prices. As he plans, Rothschild is subsequently introduced to Prince William himself who is more than pleased with discounted prices he charges for his rare coins and trinkets, and Rothschild offers him a bonus for any other business the Prince can direct his way. Rothschild subsequently becomes close associates with Prince William, and ends up doing business with him and members of the court. He soon discovers that loaning money to governments and royalty is more profitable than loaning to individuals, as the loans are bigger and are secured by the nation's taxes. 1769: Mayer Amschel Rothschild is given permission by Prince William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring that he is, "M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau." 1770: Mayer Amschel Rothschild draws up plans for the creation of the Illuminati and entrusts Ashkenazi Jew, Adam Weishaupt, a Crypto-Jew who was outwardly Roman Catholic, with its organization and development. The Illuminati is to be based upon the teachings of the Talmud, which is in turn, the teachings of Rabbinical Jews. It was to be called the Illuminati as this is a Luciferian term which means, keepers of the light. Mayer Amschel Rothschild marries Gutle Schnaper. 1773: Amschel Mayer Rothschild born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons. He like all his brothers who follow him, will enter the family business at the age of 12. 1774: Salomon Mayer Rothschild born. 1776: Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organisation of the Illuminati on May 1 of this year. The purpose of the Illuminati is to divide the goyim (all non-Jews) through political, economic, social, and religious means. The opposing sides were to be armed and incidents were to be provided in order for them to: fight amongst themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious institutions; and eventually destroy each other. Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons with this Illuminati doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand Orient to be their secret headquarters. This was all under the orders and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept has spread and is followed within Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day. Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance,and industry. They were instructed to follow the following methods in order to control people. 1) Use monetary and sex bri