webs counters - visitors, 1st READ the synopsis of a 5 page overview
then take me to the NUTS & BOLTS OF THE EVIDENCE
Or here you can listen to the LINK of 1 hour radio interview 11/4/2014
Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable "whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash!
These Websites published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article10(1) READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT
Sui juris, in propria persona www.opposepredatoryguardians.com

LIVE DIARY UPDATES with website: www.opg.me
& >> www.victimsofabuseofpower.com - www.ukrefugees.com
2010 to 2012 .. Read 2013 .. Read 2014 .. Read 2015 .. Read 2016
RELEASE my home & £20 million CLAIM STONEWALLED 31.7.15
Clarkejudgment22.2.16.pdf - BRITISHCONSULATE.pdf 11.3.2016
Jackson PROPOSED order 9.3.16 - RESPONSE FILED 15.3.16
statementtojackson11042016.pdf . ClarkeAnn10370284order120416.pdf
angelaletter13042016.pdf - AngKevAppStatement17042016.pdf
letter to No 10 Cameron18042016.pdf
FILED statement & demand for grant of probate 20.04.2016
Common law demand filed on Jacksons court of 'protection' 27.04.2016
[magistrate] peter, man, sends an order that is void 09.05.2016
peter, mans order is defaced and returned as VOID on the 12.05.2016
QUEENS BENCH DIVISION damages demand ordered 16.05.2016
2nd QUEENS BENCH DIVISION demand/CAVEAT 16.07.2016

JULY 27 2016 Visiter No.634000 to www.opg.me
Those whom, by deafening silence, in secret, behind closed doors, that run the world, using their own language of ‘legalese’ have over years, very carefully constructed the ‘mother of all frauds’ that has enslaved humanity without your knowledge, consent or full disclosure, by barratry & personage.
THIS smoke and mirrors, of deafening silence & revolving doors, that they swear an oath to protect & its brothers to uphold, conflicts with every other oath they swear in courts &/or public office, demonstrating the satanic evil contained within it.
After 15 years of trying to understand the fraud committed upon my own mother’s live estate and having been recruited myself by the masonic brethren to a level 3rd degree & then resigning I have finally figured out, after waking up, what has & is, going on.
The protection of the brethren is utmost for a mason and just to be certain that they had not overlooked me, I wrote to the masons to underline my masonic distress, that they then could not ignore, but ignore they did, whilst they in disguise, continued to plunder my mother’s live estate treating her, as all others, as DEAD under their legalese language from their fraudulently enforced ‘BAR’/‘LAW’ society.
I then realised it was a case of mason [resigned] against MASONICS.
Uncovering stone after stone along the way the plot of fraud against humanity became more and more sickening as I tread the dark path.
Today, 26.07.2016, I make this statement to reflect what I know to be the truth and how they, the masonic brethren will close their establishment ranks, which are all linked through the judiciary the courts and the government, to set out to destroy you/[me], not caring a jot about who might get in the way, such as ie my disabled mother who has paid into their system of national insurance all her life.
THE FORCE they hold is immense, but it’s all built on FRAUDULENT TREASON, lies and deceit based entirely around money and the love of it, being of course the root of the SATANIC LUCIFERIAN EVIL.
When you finally have all the nuts and bolts it’s easy to put together the fraud and how it is protected by its gate keepers in the black robes, the priests of Baal, just another side order of freemason Jesuit gatekeeping in what are supposedly ‘our courts of law’ that have been usurped by Lucifer’s army of evil.
Common Law/Common sense has been ripped up by these creatures and thrown into the trash can.
THE only law now is their law, being their statute acts and whoe betide those whom object to it.
THE EU that is unelected has thankfully been rejected showing how a democracy does work when given the chance to, especially having waited 44 years to take its course by yet another treasonous devious act by lies and deceit committed with impunity by TED HEATH in 1972.
I do not want to digress to far from the root of our problems and so I will go on….. SOON!

JULY 22 2016 Visiter No.633851 to www.opg.me

JULY 21 2016 Visiter No.633784 to www.opg.me

JULY 19 2016 Visiter No.633706 to www.opg.me

JULY 19 2016 Visiter No.633692 to www.opg.me

JULY 16 2016 Visiter No.633602 to www.opg.me

JULY 16 2016 Visiter No.633594 to www.opg.me

We now are drafting a lien to serve upon the wrongdoers including prime minister THERESA MAY.

JULY 16 2016 Visiter No.633590 to www.opg.me

JULY 13 2016 Visiter No.633485 to www.opg.me

notice to agent is notice to principal,
notice to principal is notice to agent!

demand/order: service on one is service on all!

Tuesday, 12th July 2016

URGENT - trial by jury to hear our claim(s), etc...

on notice: urgent trial by jury to hear permanent caveat in place to stop fraud upon the court and us!



Warning And Caution : caveat in permanent place until independent sworn-in trial by jury decision on our claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties/permanent caveat in place to stop fraud upon us and our mother's Estate, etc...

for permanently invoked court of [public] records, under permanently invoked common law, law of the land for all alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status...

in i: alive living soul woman court, aggrieved, with full powers of attorney general, executor/executrix for our Estates, we alive living soul claimed bodies, unlimited creditors, with first-hand verified knowledge, prosecutors, prosecuting wrongdoer(s); at queens bench division

on notice: demand/order/wish/affidavit/declaration of will and testament/as-King:

•demand/order: caveat hereby entered, 'let him beware', we are in opposition as fraud upon the court and upon us, we hereby invoke our lawful 'rights' to let an independent sworn-in 'trial by jury' decide upon these claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties/on this caveat, etc, i: alive sovereign free-born woman in law the only executor/executrix/administrator of our dearest mum's entire Estate, which we uphold by our claim of right, us with the only interest in our mum's Estate which i: alive woman, executor/executrix alone have authority for.

•on notice: no action is to take place until this caveat is lawfully heard before trial by jury, due note of our alone interest in our mother's Estate, which i: living soul woman, manage.

•on notice: absolutely no wills to be proved, no grant be sealed in our mother's Estate, no grant letters of administration, not a probate matter, unlawful trespass upon us and our properties, unlawful administration of our properties, demand/order to cease and desist until trial by jury hears this matter and decides upon it...

•sight and proofs of foundation evidence.
•sight of all proofs of claim.

•demand all claim(s) are verified in open trial by jury court, fully open with unrestricted assess to the public and media to witness justice being served and done according to law; common law does not tolerate 'secret courts with secret agendas!'.

•sight of lawful contract.

•sight of full and open honest disclosure of the facts of the contract.

•demand sight of 'Due Process' in law.

•we only operate man/woman to man/woman, alive in law.

•we are the 'alive man/woman in law; we are not the 'dead in law debt slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations.

•demand proofs we the 'alive man/woman in law' come under statutes/acts for the dead debt slaves in law, companies, corporations, which we are not!

•proofs of jurisdiction to unlawfully administrate our properties, which we put claim)s) upon! *once jurisdiction is called into question it MUST be proved and we demand/order it proved before trial by jury urgent now!

•proofs of authority.

•proofs of lawful consent.

•we do not consent, we do not agree, we refuse all unlawful administration of our properties and demand all our claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties, etc instant now!

•wrongdoer(s) man/woman guilty of failing to lawfully compensate us and to deal with matters lawfully before our demand and order sworn-in trial by jury, wrongdoer(s) unlawful time thefts from us!

•all details for our mother's Estate that i: alive woman in law, alone controls, will be given to the trial by jury to preserve our privacy and confidentiality in law, since wrongdoer(s) are guilty of unlawfully bringing the 'private' into the 'public'.

•on notice: of trespass/copyrights/trademarks, etc breaches/infringements, etc despite Writ(s) being served multiple times to Cease and Desist All Wrongdoing(s), Writ(s) of Dereliction of Duty(ies), etc...

•total abuse of us and power here, with no lawful 'separation of powers', all man/woman breaching their positions, powers and oaths of office to collude and cover-up/destroy evidence/torture and assault witnesses/very serious wrongdoing(s) and frauds for profit planned and instigated to perfection against unsuspecting innocent honourable man/woman alive in law over years causing fatalities by murder, which is why demand/order instant trial by jury sworn-in now posthaste, caveats in permanent place until trial by jury unanimous decisions, etc...

*on notice: treason/misfeasance of treason/malfeasance of treason/barratry by personage/thefts/murders/attempted murders/kidnapping/abduction/torture, etc very serious wrongdoing(s) being deliberately committed by all wrongdoer(s) breaching all laws and in gross dishonour.

**on notice: this matter is urgent, demand/order instant responses to swearing-in trial by jury members to 'judge' our claims/damages/restoration of all our properties/permanent caveat in place until trial by jury to hear our claim(s), etc...

***on notice: demand/order: all our upheld undisputed/no objections/no disputes by any living soul man/woman, our won claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties, etc stand in law and MUST be fully paid to us instant, until an independent sworn-in trial by jury members unanimously decide for or against our claim(s), etc in this these claims/damages/restoration of all our properties/hear caveat, etc etc etc...

****reminder: it is free to assess queens bench division, common law, law of the land, the highest law there is, 24/7, justice is free for all alive man/woman in law. and, justice must be seen to be done by the urgent upholding of our lawfully invoked independent sworn-in 'trial by jury!' instant!

all correspondence and attachments applies, maybe cropped, will all be used in evidence...

•without recourse,
•without prejudice,
•all rights reserved,
•errors and omissions excepted,
•Cestui Qui Vie Trust Funds all collapsed/surrendered/yield-up demand our payouts instant now, Form 206 Evidence of Life filled-in ages ago...,
•all inherent unalienable rights intact,
•demand all our claims/damages/restoration of all our properties, etc this instant now!
•UCC 1...,
•UCC 1-308,
•etc etc etc...


JULY 12 2016 Visiter No.633461 to www.opg.me

ALL it needed to expose: Fraud / theft / mal administration / treason / mis prision of treason /mis-conduct in public office / persecution amongst other serious charges is a JURY court of common law as is our rights as man/woman alive flesh born NOT debt slaves etc and the matter can be cleared up. THE MASONICS are at work doing their level best to damage limit the catastrophe that IS the COURT of PROTECTION and its affiliate OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN that are indeed criminally infiltrated organised crime gangs that need eradication NOT just from our life but countless other lives and if you need evidence its all here in this site!

JULY 11 2016 Visiter No.633415 to www.opg.me

JULY 11 2016 Visiter No.633414 to www.opg.me

JULY 11 2016 Visiter No.633412 to www.opg.me

JULY 10 2016 Visiter No.633406 to www.opg.me

JULY 9 2016 Visiter No.633361 to www.opg.me

The Birth Certificate SCAM. The BC draws you OUT of the PRIVATE, and into the PUBLIC venue, where you're a SURETY for the PUBLIC (national) DEBT.

JULY 8 2016 Visiter No.633341 to www.opg.me
Rita Taylor
mike, can you possibly consider putting the below on your website to highlight these crimes wrongdoings against us?
From: rita taylor
Date: 5 July 2016 at 14:18:26 BST
To: Police PC Caroline Robb Colindale
Subject: demand/order instant arrests/charges against all wrongdoer(s) causing us fraud/losses/harm/injuries/fatalities by murder/torture/isolated false imprisonments, etc...
notice to agent is notice to principal,
notice to principal is notice to agent!
for permanently invoked court of 'public' records, under permanently invoked common law, the highest law there is, law of the land for all 'alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status'...
attention man/woman, caroline, woman, in personal/private capacities, bearing full own liabilities in law, under penalties of perjury...
Tuesday, 5 July 2016
writ to cease and desist all wrongdoing(s) against our honourable 'alive man/woman in law' selves instant!
writ of dereliction of duty(ies)
on notice: demand/order by law the following:
1. demand proofs reported crimes have been dealt with.
2. where is our reported stolen properties, as none have been returned?
3. stolen automobile [D751 XNJ; Toyota Space Cruiser, Silver, crime number: 2420891/15] still not returned and no paperwork provided for its theft from our personal/private family driveway, yourselves stating that the LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL staff/personnel man/woman took my property because it had tons of parking tickets on it, this was confirmed by the LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL man/woman as being complete wrong incorrect information given by yourselves, they also stated from their own investigations that these thefts of not only our automobile, but burglaries of our properties were carried out by jon dickinson and his social services departments, who have no authority and no paperworks to do such criminal wrongdoing(s) to us and being supported in serious wrongdoing(s) by all colluding agencies connected, with very serious breaches of 'NO' 'separation of powers'. so, demand automobile back, return of all our burglarised properties, computer, electrical goods, clothing, all our personal and private properties are demanded instantly returned, plus sight of all the relevant paperworks/documents connected to these thefts that are all still outstanding!
evidence concerning the theft of my automobile [D751XNJ] from our private family driveway:
Date: 25 February 2016 at 09:57:11 GMT
To: rita taylor
Subject: Re: Parking Tickets involving D751XNJ
Our Ref: 101000684138
Dear Ms Taylor,
Thank you for your e-mail.
We can confirm that there are no penalty charge notices on vehicle registration D751XNJ.
However if a ticket was issued in the last 24 hours it will not show on our systems yet.
If you need to contact us again regarding your enquiry, please e-mail Parking.Permits@barnet.gov.uk. Alternatively you can call on 0208 359 7446 Monday to Thursday 9am to 5:15pm or Friday 9am to 5pm. Further information about council services can be found by visiting www.barnet.gov.uk.
Kind regards,
Lori-Ann Hooper
Parking br> London Borough of Barnet,
North London Business Park,
Oakleigh Road South,
London, N11 1NP
Tel: 0208 359 7446
Barnet Online: www.barnet.gov.uk
CSG is delivered by Capita plc on behalf of London Borough of Barnet.
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email
How do you rate the service provided in this email?
....End of evidence concerning my stolen automobile [D751XNJ silver Toyota Space Cruiser] stolen by Policeman/woman colluding with Barnet Council staff/personnel man/woman!
4. lawful documents have been served upon yourselves for instant arrests and charges brought against all connected with these criminal wrongdoing(s) and attempting to cover-up these very serious on-going non-stop criminal wrongdoing(s) activities against us, deliberately doing these thieving murderous crimes to us, unlawfully isolating us to carry out these crimes, fabricating evidence, holding us unlawfully isolated England's prisoners robbed of all our properties/family/freedom/liberty/assets/privacy/confidentiality/identity thefts/fraud/losses/harm/injuries/murders/our post stolen from all locations connected to us/torture/harassments/bullying/intimidations/breaches of Data Protection Act/unlawfully administering my properties/slander/defamation of character(s)/libel/no due process of law/deliberate unlawful assets-stripping against us/abusing us made isolated & vulnerable/null and void fraudulent 'orders' being unlawfully with treason, malfeasance of treason, misfeasance of treason/magistrates deliberately and wilfully Administering unlawful Oaths, contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835, other offences do apply against [12610636 2.11.2015, 11.6.2015, etc] carolyn/caroline hilder/elizabeth batten/carr, etc [A20100044 Fri 2.7.2010] to asset-strip us, no due process of law, no defendant, no lawful independent sworn-in trial by jury members to hear evidence for the 'alive man/woman in law' us, etc etc...
5. no lawful separation of powers, all colluding man/woman falsifying evidence, committing perjury/lies, destroying evidence, stealing evidence and files from us, unlawfully isolating us to carry out these mafia instigated colluding horrendous torturing thieving murderous crimes over years against us, time thefts from us!
6. we demand arrests/charges brought against all reported to police man/woman, [policeman andy chapman Fraud Operation 'Falcon' committing further wrongdoings against us, Crime Number 2410793/15] [Action Fraud: CHS9597 6.7.2015; NFRC15050103 and NFRC150501035814 8.5.2015; elizabeth batten and carolyn/caroline hilder] Action Fraud by telephone and online, criminal dangerous thieving murderous wrongdoer(s) man/woman involved in this asset-stripping for their profits crimes against us.
7. we have permanently invoked common law, the highest law there is, law of the land for all 'alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status', yet we are unlawfully being made 'dead debt slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations in law' in order to asset-strip us further, time thieve from us, isolate and do further wrongdoing(s) to us, continuing to steal all our properties and hold us England's isolated prisoners, etc...
8. there can NEVER be any contracts between the 'alive man/woman in law' and the 'dead in law', but we 'alive man/woman in law' are being unlawfully subjected continually to these wrongdoing(s) by every colluding mafia government agency invoked in these abuses of power and unlawfully no 'separation of powers'.
9. demand arrests made and charges brought against michael culver [police CHS29447 Mon 18.1.2016] [Royal Mail Ref: 858380111 dated 15.2.2016 michael robert culver fraudulent application into Royal Mail to steal my post invading our privacy/confidentiality] for stealing my post, mail, packages/unlawfully administering my properties, accounts/breaches of Data Protection Act/slander/defamation of character/libel/identity thefts/fraud/losses to us/causing us harm and injuries/time thefts/unlawfully acting on null and void fraudulent 'orders' for his own profit from doing deliberate wrongdoing(s) to us and attempting to charge myself for his wrongdoing(s), etc...
10. demand arrests and charges brought against jennifer dias and cameron ryan for colluding fraudulent thieving murderous wrongdoing(s), slander, libel, defamation of character, perjury, lies, unlawfully administering my properties/breaches of Data Protection Act/time thefts from us, etc...
11. demand arrests and charges brought against lloyd wint of SIGN HEALTH and LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL, for unlawfully administering my properties/accounts/thefts/stealing post/abuses of made isolated vulnerable for profits/breaches of Data Protection Act/slander/libel, etc...
12. our copyrights/trademarks all breached/infringements, fee schedules applies.
13. the torture/theft/asset-stripping/murder of our dearest honourable mum, whilst policeman/woman watched the horror and refused to do their paid/salaried jobs, thereby wilfully stealing public funds, etc still doing exactly the same to all our family/properties still!
14. our properties are unlawfully being administered/destroyed/stolen/possessed, etc without our lawful authority/permission/consent/no contracts, etc. we demand/order the instant return of all our properties now!
15. the list of horrendous thieving murderous criminal wrongdoing(s) endless, demanding and ordering instant arrests and charges, remedies according to law to correct, there can by law be no wrongdoing(s) without compensation. demand all our claims/damages, etc are lawfully dealt with instant, no more time thefts from us, we demand all our properties back, we demand our family/freedom/assets, etc etc etc according to law...
Statement of Offence:
Administering an unlawful Oath, contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835, possibly other offences do apply here.
Particulars of Offence:
Reference Concerning Case Number 12610636 For Both Magistrates carolyn/caroline hilder and elizabeth batten:
carolyn/caroline hilder and elizabeth batten being magistrates for the Court of Protection, LONDON, on 2nd November 2015 and 11th June 2015 respectively, did unlawfully administer an Oath an Order Appointing An Interim Deputy For Property And Affairs on 2nd November 2015 by carolyn/caroline hilder and a Draft Order On Behalf Of The Mayor And Burgesses Of The London Borough Of Barnet on 11th June 2015 by elizabeth batten; in a manner which the said magistrates hilder/batten had no jurisdiction, namely:
The magistrates hilder/batten has sworn an Oath to well and truly serve our sovereign lady queen elizabeth the second in the Office of Magistrates hilder/batten and to do right by all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affectation or ill-will.
The aforesaid Oath under Common Law, Law of the Land, does not authorise any magistrate in the Common Law jurisdiction of England and Wales to adjudicate any Hearing in which the matter is to be decided in any way other than by a Trial by Jury, for the 'alive man/woman in law', who are at position number two below God and Trial by Jury at number one position, the sitting magistrates hilder/batten at position number three below 'alive man/woman in law' at number two position, no one below number two position for 'alive man/woman in law' can possibly sit in judgment when they are below the number two position, God and Trial by Jury is at number one position, therefore it stands to reason that magistrates hilder/batten deliberately acted outside of jurisdiction, deliberately breaking their Oaths of Office to do crimes to innocents for their monetary financial profits, unlawfully raiding the Cestui Que Vie Trust Funds for their victims.
Furthermore, in the Hearing in question there was no Injured Party, no Corpus Delicti, and no Defendant, no one or 'alive man/woman in law' applicable coming under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Therefore, the Common Law Oaths of Office under which the magistrates hilder/batten claimed authority is unlawful and constitutes an offence contrary to section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.
The fact that the magistrates hilder/batten sat is considered to be prima facie evidence of the offence.
magistrate hilder also knowingly sat on more than one occasion deliberately and knowingly breaking her Oath of Office over a period of time approaching or over a year in time, 2015-2016.
*[magistrate] carr has also breached his 'Oath of Office' and guilt of the offence outlined above in detail, on Friday, 2nd July 2010 [A20100044 Fri 2.7.2010] with policeman/woman, dick brown, alexandra dunmore and alison turner, etc submitting into evidence fraudulent, perjurious, lying evidence, deliberately not having an independent sworn-in trial by jury members present to 'judge' the proceedings! this court 'order' is fraudulent, null and void in law, void ab initio! this was deliberately instigated to asset-strip our mother, abusing all our family members/our properties/us 'alive man/woman in law', etc this is gross abuses of power, abuses of us, no due process of law, no defendant(s), unlawfully no trial by jury members to hear the 'claims' for the 'alive woman in law' myself one of the victim(s) here and our tortured/abused/asset-stripped/robbed/murdered for her assets mum, etc...
on notice: demand/order take permanent note of the following:
•we are not 'titles'.
•no capitalisation is used in our 'appellations' 'names', see Black's Law Dictionary on the 'capitalisation of names'.
•when an 'appellation' is used for a 'name' it can never ever be the 'alive man/woman in law', since 'alive man/woman in law' are unlimited in all things, unique and special, made in the likeness of God, so a 'name' cannot ever be them, or define them, or describe them, a 'name' is simply not the 'alive man/woman in law!
•we are not 'dead in law'!
•we are not 'dead debt slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations in law'.
•we permanently invoke common law, highest law there is/law of the land for all 'alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status'.
•there can NEVER EVER be any contracts between the 'alive man/woman in law' and the 'dead in law'.
•the 'alive man/woman in law' are at position number two under common law; all magistrates man/woman at position three, so it is impossible for magistrates man/woman to 'sit' in judgment of 'alive man/woman in law', only God/Trial by Jury members are at position number one under common law and capable of 'judging' the 'alive man/woman in law', everything else would be fraudulent and null and void in law, void ab initio.
•any 'siting' magistrate doing a court 'order' for 'alive man/woman in law' would automatically be deliberately fraudulent on the magistrates part, with wilful breaches of their common law 'Oaths of Office', which is an automatic arrestable and chargeable serious offence in law, the subsequent court 'order' would be fraudulent, null and void in law, void ab initio.
•see Halbury's Laws on Administration Courts, that nothing can be done to make them lawful!
•we do not give permission, consent, or authority for our personal/private properties to be administered/destroyed/stolen/possessed by anyone other than us!
•we are not a 'you' or a 'your'!
•demand to know who 'you' and 'your' is?
•send to 'you' or 'your'!
•do not recognise 'you' or 'your'!
•no joinder.
•demand/order no trespass onto our properties.
•all our properties held 'Allodial Title Fee Simple Absolute', which means we hold all of them outright, free of any duties/taxes/levies/fees/costs, etc...
•demand/order instant return and restoration of all our stolen properties belonging to us 'alive man/woman in law', forthwith and on formal official records! demand/order policeman/woman to do their paid/salaried jobs with no time thefts from us, instant!
•our time is not free, that we can never get back, so fee schedules do apply and in operation!
•demand/order all sacked/dismissed man/woman as per written correspondence and attachments is instantly put in prison for life with loss of all their assets, to not only protect us, but the global populous!
•we are not a 'defendant' from your 'dead in law world' EVER, NEVER EVER!!
•all wrongdoer(s) acting on fraudulent fake paperwork(s)/bearing perjurious, lying autographs submitted into evidence, all carry life imprisonments and loss of all wrongdoer(s) assets!
•we assert/demand/order/invoke all our rights according to law, common law.
•demand/order all proofs from all police, man/woman concerned, of lawful dealing(s) with our reported criminal wrongdoing(s) and of dealing with the wrongdoer(s), under penalties of perjury, with full and complete disclosure of all the facts, all evidence needs to be verified in open court before an independent sworn-in trial by jury members to 'judge' all 'claims', and that matters have indeed been dealt with correctly according to law, common law...
•etc etc etc...
on notice: yourselves, all colluding for profits by ill gotten gains, man/woman, wrongdoer(s) guilty of bringing the private into the public which are serious offences in law...
all correspondence and attachments applies maybe cropped, will all be used in evidence...
•without prejudice,
•without recourse,
•all rights reserved,
•all inherent born with unalienable rights intact,
•errors and omissions excepted,
•Cestui Que Vie Trust Funds collapsed demand our instant payouts long overdue, Form 206 Evidence of Life fill-out ages ago,
•UCC 1 copyrights/trademarks notices breaches/infringements with fee schedules in operation,
•UCC 1-308, etc...,
•etc etc etc...

Date: 5 July 2016 at 10:47:58 BST
To: rita taylor
Subject: Call to police
Dear Ms Taylor,
I have been made aware that "you" called police stating that previous reports of crime of theft and murder had not been taken seriously.
I would be grateful if "you" could let me know if anything has happened since we were last in communication several months ago as I know that matters "you" had raised up until then were dealt with???.
Caroline Robb PS 20SX
Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer.
Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary.
NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).
Find us at:
Facebook: Facebook.com/metpoliceuk
Twitter: @metpoliceuk

JULY 8 2016 Visiter No.633340 to www.opg.me

JULY 8 2016 Visiter No.633338 to www.opg.me
From:NORMAN SCARTH againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
To: freedomtalkradio2013@gmail.com; lotusprincess4u@googlemail.com; edward.w.ellis@gmail.com; leejaycant@yahoo.co.uk
CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: PH Solicitor? Wrong, wrong, WRONG!
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:33:09 +0100

This solicitor (I wish you had got his name), is wrong on every count.
He is either completely useless, or, more likely, he is working for the other side.
"courts getting cheesed off with emails"? ​Of course they are! They think they are God Almighty, want The Public to worship them, to keep silent, & to mind their own business. ​
It IS our business!
"solicitor has said peter requests radio silence until the jury has made a final descion"?

I wonder? ​Has Peter really said this, or is it the solicitor speaking? ​ ​
To wait till after the jury's 'final decision? ​
It's too late then! (and the solicitor knows it!)
The solicitor has said "the judge is fair".
He would say that wouldn't he!
Beware the judge who pretends to be on your side! ​ ​
That is just to make it look as though the victim is getting a 'fair trial', & to give him false hope.
"no one can prove peter didn’t put the images on the computer ""
He does not NEED to prove that Peter didn't put the images on the computer.
All he needs to do is cast doubt on the prosecution's motives, & without doubt it is to silence him, & a warning to other whistle-blowers. ​
The decision to charge him as they have done is because they know there only needs to be mention of 'child abuse' to turn the world against the victim of their malice. ​
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ​
Now to the bit where the solicitor says, "Information from various people including Norman scarth isn’t any good at this stage as its only helping as a character witness ​ not as a expert on images ". Who on earth told him that? ​ ​The evidence I would give would NOT be as a 'character witness'. ​And I am certainly not an expert on 'images' (but, as said above, that is completely unnecessary). ​
However, I AM an expert - none greater - ​on skulduggery in the courts, on what constitutes a 'Fair Trial', & on the treatment meted out to whistle-blowers in Britain! ​
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THAT ​is what the jury needs to know about - but, not surprisingly, that is something that the solicitor, ​& barrister, who are SUPPOSED to be defending Peter don't want them to hear!
Norman Scarth
To: butlincat75@googlemail.com; et al
From: freedomtalkradio2013@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:06:50 +0100
A Solicitor with a ​Irish accent has just called me advising me the courts ​ are getting cheesed of with many emails from many people.
Peters solicitor has said peter requests radio silence until the jury has made a final descion
He tells me the judge is fair and the trial is going peters way how ever no one can prove peter didn’t put the images on the computer and at this stage we need the judge onside its a 50/50 chance of not guilty.
He told me expert computer people for the defence wasn’t helpful when the pcs hard drives ​was looked at.
He also said Information from various people including Norman scarth isn’t any good at this stage as its only helping as a character witness ​ not as a expert on images.
He told me peters maximum sentence is 4 years so he would be due for release on dec 1 2016 ​ ​ if the prison governor agreed he could be released immediately ​ ​ I have told the solicitor peter can stay with us and there’s housing available.
Thats all I know

JULY 4 2016 Visiter No.633177 to www.opg.me

JULY 3 2016 Visiter No.633165 to www.opg.me
the Universal declaration of rights asserts “that a citizen of a state in which that citizen is present has the liberty to travel, reside in, and/or work in any part of the state where one pleases within the limits of respect for the liberty and rights of others, and that a citizen also has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country at any time”. So with this in mind an act of parliament, must comply with this ruling. i man did not write the law they did and what`s more the Government signed and contracted to both domestically and commercially, it’s a done deal and an inalienable right in law. To add it`s also a fundamental right to which a person is inherently entitled simply because he/she is a human being. And,it is my belief when looking at cf. R v Donavan [1934] 2KB 498 at 507, [1934] AII ER Rep 207 at 210 in delivering that judgment of the court of criminal appeal Swift J states: “If an act is unlawful in the sense of being itself a criminal act, it is plain that it cannot be rendered lawful because the person to whose detriment it is done consents to it. No person can licence another to commit a crime”.
Justice swift is stating that driving without government documents such as licences, Mot`s etc can be “of itself criminal”, as the government licence these acts and therefore they cannot be criminal. In the opinion of cf. Ex Parte lewis (1888) 21 Q.B.D. 191 Wilis J said in regard to public right of passage the only “dedication” in the legal sense that we are aware of is that as of a public right of passage, as which the legal description is a “right for all Her Majesty’s subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance”.The House of Commons library documents in cf. Roads Unadopted standard Note: SN/BT/402 last updated 18 October 2010 Author; Louise Butcher; Section Business and transport: What is a Highway? “There is no statutory definition of a highway only a common law one. That definition is quite clear; a “Highway is a way over which all members of the public have a right to pass and re-pass. Their use of the way must be as of right, not on sufferance or by licence”. 1 And, In the case of cf. DPP v. jones and another Lord Irvine LC states “The law should not make unlawful what is common place and well accepted there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights”. Sherer v. Cullen, 481 f 946

JUNE 30 2016 Visiter No.633059 to www.opg.me

JUNE 30 2016 Visiter No.633052 to www.opg.me
We will be filing by recorded delivery a formal complaint of masonic conspiracy to deny access to her majesties court of common law in acts of misconduct of public office leading to misprision of treason offences that need police involvement to identify the culprits whom are conducting such frauds upon our courts.
Let's see how far up the ladder that masonic corruption extends by filing such a complaint to see if it gets investigated and of which I seriously doubt!

JUNE 29 2016 Visiter No.633036 to www.opg.me

JUNE 28 2016 Visiter No.632892 to www.opg.me

JUNE 26 2016 Visiter No.632810 to www.opg.me

I asked:
'if the human being'?
they reply
'The person in question'??
The person! being of course the corporation legal fiction strawman but this does not apply to the human being!!!
WHICH was the question!

Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Moving abroad
Dear OPGInformationAssurance,
The original question has been interpreted wrongly.
The PERSON is not what I referred to.
Human being was the question but this I may not have elaborated upon properly, as what I should say is;

•alive man/woman
•alive with souls, claimed bodies, sovereign free-born man/woman

This is the wo/man/alive with soul, claimed bodies that is sovereign free-born and demanded release of funds after emigration with due submitted clinical doctors reports proving capacity to live where and with whom and after such a denial of release of funds suffered losses that until now have been ignored.
Perhaps now might be the time for the ministry of justice to define the difference of: person;
as to, man woman alive with souls claimed bodies free born?
It also needs clarification as whom is responsible after complaints raised were not sufficiently investigated?
AND if they were... were covered over and buried!
The deputy was discharged but due compensation never paid!
YOU as corporation, as dead entities are liable for such losses and also the CEO at the time in his capacity as a man martin [john]
NOW the question is put into the formal format we demand an answer?
Yours sincerely,
mike: clarke
•alive man/woman
•alive with souls, claimed bodies, sovereign free-born man/woman

JUNE 26 2016 Visiter No.632804 to www.opg.me

If you cross reference the dates you can clearly see the frauds going on and that any objections or claims are completely ignored in favour of them placed onto the property long before the objection deadline of the 16th June 2016 where they had already got restriction dated 25th May 2016.

JUNE 26 2016 Visiter No.632798 to www.opg.me

JUNE 25 2016 Visiter No.632786 to www.opg.me

JUNE 19 2016 Visiter No.632575 to www.opg.me

JUNE 18 2016 Visiter No.632540 to www.opg.me
with friend Gordon @ Tommys Cabaret Lounge

JUNE 17 2016 Visiter No.632495 to www.opg.me

JUNE 16 2016 Visiter No.632468 to www.opg.me

Long story short
Last year (2015) there was an 'altercation' in a court in Welshpool. A 'bit of shouting'? (And, no doubt, a few home truths ... from Guy .... to some Solicitor).
Suddenly, months later (January, this year), the police turn up at 8:00pm, at Guy's home, and arrest him.
Guy spends 20 hours in police custody, and is then shipped to Aberystwyth to stand trial for something or other.
It turns out that he's charged with a Section 5 Public Order offence. It is the MINIMUM Public Order offence. If you break wind, in front of a Copper, you can be charged under Section 5. However, it is such a minimal offence that you cannot be imprisoned for a Section 5 offence.
In Aberystwyth, Guy points out that he has no idea why he is there ... that he has never been cautioned or formally charged ... has no paperwork ... has never been bailed ... and doesn't know what is going on. He also claims that there is NO CASE TO ANSWER.
The SICK, PSYCHOPATHIC Clerk of the Court (Michael Cray) spits blood ... and has Guy arrested and imprisoned for 7 days.
Meanwhile this SICKO arranges for the imprisonment to be listed as a "Contempt of Court" ... because imprisonment isn't an option for a Section 5 Public Order offence.
All of this has been Appealed ... including a complaint against the SICKO PSYCHO.
In the video above, Guy gives potted history, and also explains what happened during the final Appeal Hearing last Tuesday 14th June.
The SICKO PSYCHO was placed in the Witness Box and questioned (by Guy) for about 1 1/2 hours.
Apparently (according to this PSYCHO):
1) He considers himself to be a 'Hitman' against Freemen-on-the-Land, and was specially "wheeled into" the Hearing in Aberystwyth.
2) There is a 'Black List' of "Freemen-on-the-Land" ... and any associates ... such that they will get HARSHER treatment ... for daring to raise questions about the ENDEMIC CORRUPTION.
So ... there you go. No surprises there, then ... but good to have confirmation ... so thanks Guy ... and well done!!

JUNE 16 2016 Visiter No.632455 to www.opg.me

JUNE 15 2016 Visiter No.632420 to www.opg.me
in this email

JUNE 14 2016 Visiter No.632417 to www.opg.me
in this email

JUNE 11 2016 Visiter No.632255 to www.opg.me

JUNE 10 2016 Visiter No.632233 to www.opg.me

JUNE 9 2016 Visiter No.632180 to www.opg.me

ALONG with this reply will be a final demand for questions to be answered failing which proof of fraud will become tacit agreement where we can attached the CEO of land graham farrant to our financial damages along with the co conspirators to defraud alastair pitblado & peter aruthur brian jackson as men in their private capacity.

JUNE 9 2016 Visiter No.632177 to www.opg.me
SAME response

here the pdf letter

JUNE 8 2016 Visiter No.632103 to www.opg.me
Yesterdays events are really quite significant on several fronts. All of which relate to the jeopardy that the court of 'protection' have placed my mothers life in whilst breaching several human rights.
The family court is using other members of family's hearsay to justify its actions that can easily in fact, in a lawful common law jury court be proved lies and nor would they be admissible plus the distinct lack credability due to the family's own proved dishonerable actions against their own mother over 20 years, this is on top of not providing one ounce of direct care.
The court care not one jot about this what so ever, as it suits their overall agenda to use, as the romans have done over centuries, rules, 'admiralty' rules ie sTaTuTe, now talmudic, maritime courts to divide and conquer.
The relatives lack of educated intelligence cannot see the frauds and so continue blinded mainly because of their blinkered vision see's only, their own goal which is to pigeon hole their own mother into what they see as the best for her, without listening to one word uttered of mum's own 'words of' capacity in which even if she did not have capacity, under mental health sTaTuTe rules would still be entitled to her wishes met 'right or wrong'.
So the courts using their fraudulent bent system can manipulate the so called 'patient' into their own corrupt masonic environment.
The problem that they have created is exposure to serious health problems for mum, by denying her the rights to have dignity, in providing for her own care expenses whilst being forced abroad into exile from such utter, vile, satanic masonic corruption, being pushed upon her. The denial of her own property that is under the control of her living will executor as per such living will, but unlawfully court blocked, leaves her without immediate health care should the UK vote out of EU on the 23rd June 2016 again placing her in a periless position.
My partner and I have now acquired 2 jobs each within the entertainment area and are working sometimes double shifts as was the case yesterday a total of 10 hours ie from 5pm until 9pm in one venue then 9pm till 2pm in another leaving mum for an inordinate amount of time that I would rather not do! When this doubles into me and my partner doing the same as was the case yesterday it forces mum into one position for that duration of time ie on a chair or in her bed because she cannot walk. Mum has not fully recovered from her bed sores acquired in Thailand from her bout of dehydration and that I am trying to keep on top of that recovery by ie turning her in her bed every couple of hours that I cannot do when working and therefore because she cannot do it herself her condition is at risk by being denied her 'carer' from
a] the withdrawal of UK benefits for dissability care and mobility that she is entitled as she paid into the system all her life for such insurance and her exile has been forced by breach of human rights where she is entitled to investigations by law into the allegations of fraud and theft upon her estate that have not been conducted.
b] she has capacity and has had capacity from day one that is yet to be exposed just another fraud and that even without it she has a living will executor trying to protect her health by the sale of her property prevented and denied by the court.
In effect the UK family court system is killing her indirectly, one way or another.
It is for the above reason we make the statement here and now, for a future common law jury court to assess proper damages and in the hope mum does not deteriorte any further. I do believe that the spanish hospital had given up on her prognosis but from my documented video care had made inroads to better health for mum but this now is being made impossible by having to take 2 jobs and the removal of mums dissability allowance and my care allowance plus the prevention of the sale of her property to provide care funds for needed medical requirements of now and the future. These allegations I lay directly at the court of neglection which is indeed a masonic based satanic CoN of fraudulent business, causing untold hardship for mum in her unhealthy late years that the court are to blame for.
Today we take on board SPANISH RESIDENCIA!
here a book called AGAINST HER WILL!

Mum at 8pm today

JUNE 7@1430hrs 2016 Visiter No.632068 to www.opg.me
House buyers pulls out because the matter is taking too long!!
Recorded telephone conversation to follow, to be used in evidence against the criminal court of 'protection', who are only using hearsay to do what they do, protecting themselves against the allegations that are now mounting to substantial figures.
here in this call

JUNE 7@1300hrs 2016 Visiter No.632055 to www.opg.me

JUNE 7@11am 2016 Visiter No.632050 to www.opg.me

JUNE 7@10am 2016 Visiter No.632045 to www.opg.me

JUNE 6 2016 Visiter No.631977 to www.opg.me

JUNE 4 2016 Visiter No.631971 to www.opg.me
in a 3.5 hours youtube video here

JUNE 4 2016 Visiter No.631955 to www.opg.me

i man reply here below \/\/\/\/----

returned today no contract no consent

JUNE 3 2016 Visiter No.631884 to www.opg.me

JUNE 2 2016 Visiter No.631835 to www.opg.me
GRAHAM FARRANT recorded letter dispatched

MAY 31 2016 Visiter No.631790 to www.opg.me

MAY 30 2016 Visiter No.631717 to www.opg.me

full 5 pages here http://opg.me/landregisterrestriction.pdf
RESPONSE to TITLE No LA826609 [re Jo Savage letter/notice B136]
URGENT sending by email, fax and recorded delivery post to the
alastair [pitblado] & graham [farrant]
notice to agent is notice to principle
notice to principle is notice to agent

The order of the 9th MAY 2016 was VOID by TREASON
Your offer by notice B136 is defaced and attached as refused not contracting services not required
Quote; my property/mum, ann [CLARKE], is being deprived of her human being rights [evidence & proof of life form 206 http://opg.me/206-signedann.pdf] here
& that
The Land Registry ( Rules ) Committee stated on record in 2008, they "were satisfied the LRA2002 [LAND REGISTRY ACT] complied with the HRA [HUMAN RIGHTS ACT] and thus, section six of that Act".
It must then follow there has been a breach of the HRA, as there has been no regard for mum's wishes in seeking dignity, to provide her own medical care/costs by the sale of her home, a course of action she has been forced to take as her dissability and care funding has been withdrawn by her residing abroad, a situation again forced upon her, as me her only carer and also with all the executor rights to attend to her legal affairs through a legally drawn up living will that this judge confirms has legal force [http://opg.me/will20082012.pdf] here, would face incarceration if we both return to the UK.
We therefore strenuously point out that Land Registry's role is one to register property/land, and to make record of the details involved in such transactions as transfers of ownership, run smoothly.
It is not the role of Land Registry to involve itself in extra curricular activities to do the bidding of courts acting outside of Acts of Parliament such as their refusing to comply with a validly made subject access request made under the Data Protection Act which clearly is defined in the Human Rights Act as, the right to a fair trial (section 6.1), being the means to seek information to use to put your case and your defence at court [currently ongoing within QUEENS BENCH RCJ claim here linked
We seek to assert and demand, Land Registry CEO provide their 'defence' for acting outside of their practises / procedures / protocols, in seeking to do the bidding of unlawful actions that can only achieve further hardship on my elderly sick mother whose entitlement to her rights supersede any unlawful and unjust meanderings of Land Registry being couched to foster.
YOU as CEO but man, graham [FARRANT] and your organisation have five working days to reply .
We reserve all our rights if you fail to provide a full and lawfully proper defence for your actions, to seek any actions available to us, including involving our MP and legal/lawful advisors into these communications and any reply that results from it, not excluding a commercial lien that we may seek to issue upon you in your private capacity as a man, for £10,000,000 [ten million pounds] in your failure to comply with our demand for a lawful response immediately to imanmike@rake.net
This correspondence will be duplicated, served & enacted upon the Official Solicitor himself personally in his private capacity as a man alastair [PITBLADO].
[If I were either of YOU, I would tread with extreme caution!]

MAY 30 2016 Visiter No.631688 to www.opg.me

MAY 30 2016 Visiter No.631686 to www.opg.me

MAY 29 2016 Visiter No.631666 to www.opg.me


Where swearing an oath to protect the brethren above all other is completely incompatible with the public oath of office taken. The contradiction is blatant, the fraud is just another fraud built upon other frauds of identity theft of the corporate person name/strawman used to gain sTaTuTe joinder to incarcerate you whether that be by prison OR under their Mental Capacity ACT 2005 rules that are completely unfit for purpose unless the purpose is to protect satanic priests of baal worshippers that are indeed committing heinous crimes against babies, infants, and those whom stand against such barbarity as I and others being kidnapped, forced into exile and or denied rights and justice under jewish zionist talmudic rule from the B>A>R> British Admiralty Rule.
READ about the reality of false prophets here

MAY 28 2016 Visiter No.631651 to www.opg.me
last date of contact 16/5/2016 after the release of this VIDEO

Rita is the person speaking on this video of making a jury court common lore claim that was made public recently she is now missing believed kidnapped by the satanic ruling elite until proved otherwise... her facebook profile is..
The police have been informed but terminated the call today @4pm 28/5/2016 in a video to be released shortly.
This is the pioneering work that Rita has been persuing..
by rita taylor Reclaim Divinity as Prosecutor over Satanic wrongdoers under common law and UCC - in which you are the Prosecutor of an unlimited number of wrongdoers and demand nullification of fraud actions, claim damages and compensation as remedy, cure, maintenance as a freewill man woman, principle, deity from a magistrate of a lower fiction corporate system..
TEMPLATE 01 by rita taylor in "susan's court", Introduction
at queens bench division', etc everyone's own personal 'court' completely under your rules, your terms, with your orders demanded to be carried out by your public servants, if they do not like it, then let them urgently convene a 'trial by jury', but your input of documents must be complied with. maxims of law:~ 'as no man can dismiss another man's claims' 'any man who wants to wrongfully steal another man's world, can have his entire world and more lawfully taken from him':~
queen's bench division magistrates can then either:~
1. pay up;
2. negotiate;
3. invoke a 'trial by jury';
4. the worse possible option would be for them to do further crimes!
template for a claim into queens bench division:~
important: everything must be in lower case letters, avoid all capital letters, unless a Company/Corporation or names of towns/cities, etc...
do not go to the court, or court 37, deal with everything on paper, preferably by email to keep down costs, keep things simple. best avoid all telephone calls with all government staff men/women as they will try devious unlawful tricks and lies to push through their crimes.
do not fill-out their forms or pay any fees, this is not an application, but a common lore/law 'claim, order, award', to award your own damages and settlements and gets things quickly sorted; this 'claim, order, award' is above any magistrate order.
example: ~ the claimant/the victim here is john paul joseph [smith]; under common lore/law a man can only have two names, and none of those two names can be a surname! in fact, no adult man/woman can have an identifying name under common lore/law. an adult man/woman can use an 'appellation' in order to deal with commerce.
thou = singular
you = plural
everything in lower case letters, the layout and style must be kept to, without changes. omit, add or include to own personal circumstances.
when completed send via paper or email to queens bench division, copy in whoever appropriate. ...........
Subject: [case numbers, in these squared brackets] common lore, queens bench division invoked, demand order damages instantly!
notice to agent is notice to principal,
notice to principal is notice to agent!
x3 once, twice, thrice...
reference: [case numbers] common lore, queens bench division invoked, demand order damages instantly!
demand and order: court of records [public], common lore [law = is legalese word] permanently invoked...
demand and order: service on one is service on all; all duly filed and served....
in john paul-joseph court at queens bench division
date here
i: man, prosecutor
UK PLC UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION LIMITED all derivatives thereof... all government staff men/women in their person/private capacities... (numbered list of wrongdoers men/women, put outside of these brackets) 1. put name of wrongdoer here in lower case letters. 2. as number one above... 3. as number one above... 4. as number one above... etc etc etc...
all as above wrongdoer(s) all as above email addresses, liens, estoppels, bills, etc etc...
nature of case: claim, order, award...
claim: trespass [list the crimes in these squared brackets, example - theft]
i: man demand, require 'court of record', common lore ; 'trial by jury';
i: man, claim, order, award:
• the said wrongdoer(s) trespass upon i: man property(ies);
• the causal agent of the trespass, comes by way of its use of forged instruments, (list the crimes outside of these brackets, example theft)...;
• the trespass did and does harm, injuries, losses, fraud, etc to i: man property(ies);
• the commencement of the wrong, harm, injuries, losses, fraud, etc etc began on and around (put date crimes started, outside of these brackets);
• the wrong, harm, injuries, losses, fraud, etc etc continues to this day, (put the date you are doing this claim, outside of these brackets);
• i: man, demand, order: the immediate nullification/discharge with prejudice of [put case numbers in these squared brackets you want nullified]; all such written nullity documents must be produced and sent to i: man, instantly;
• i: man, demand, order and award: compensation and damages for the initial and continual trespass upon my property(ies) and the immediate return of all stolen property(ies), instantly or the clock continues to tick by the second [viz.., moment in time] for (put amount in words, pounds sterling, and in numbers, for any per second of time thefts delays in paying out damages, put figures outside of these brackets) per second for every second unlawfully deprived of property(ies);
• i: man, demand, order and award: compensation and damages due instantly: (put amount in words, pounds sterling, and in numbers, outside of these brackets) is overdue payment, demand this amount is forwarded instantly to i: an alive/breathing/with soul/sovereign/flesh and blood/free born man immediately posthaste or further damages/costs/charges/interest/time thefts, etc will become due...;
i: man, say here, and will verify in open court, common lore, trial by jury, that all herein be true...
so, say, demand, order and award, i: man, all said payments and documents must instantly be produced and given posthaste no delay to i: man, now...urgent action needed, demanded and ordered: life endangerments, necessary and proper, needs; i: man/woman/our family are not part of your society...
notice: demand, order: i: man does not take surety for the legal person, a fiction, a piece of paper, strawman...
[case president at Warwick Crown Court, queens bench invoked, on 13.12.2013 Rugby Borough Council vs resham maan]
all correspondence and attachments applies, maybe cropped...
without recourse, without prejudice, non-assumpsit, all rights reserved, all inherent unalienable rights intact, errors and omissions excepted, maybe copied, recorded, circulated, without further notice..., all evidence can and will be used in evidence...,
debts: cestui que vie trust funds collapsed still awaiting lore-full/lawful payouts to ourselves, i: man, demand, order and award this is instantly remedied forthwith...,
debts: unlawfully using i: man/woman/our family, who are alive/breathing/with souls/sovereign/fleshand blood/free born men/women, as dead debt slaves/companies/corporations, etc without fuldisclosure/without our express permission/without our consent/without valid contracts, etc etc demand damages/remedies/settlements/resolutions according to lore/law now long overdue payments to ourselves
- i: man, demand, order and award instant payments to remedy now forthwith...; UCC 1-308, etc...;
etc etc etc...
SUPREME COURT VIDEO CALL 27th MAY 2016 regarding conflicts of oaths in a satanist denial of justice by conflict of oaths.
SUPREME COURT biographies here

MAY 28 2016 Visiter No.631645 to www.opg.me

MAY 27 2016 Visiter No.631592 to www.opg.me
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:09:34 +0100
Subject: Corruption in Court of protection
From: md93752@gmail.com
To: info@factuk.org.uk
CC: md93752@gmail.com
Dear Sir/Madam
last month my family lost a battle with Essex County Council, resulting in the CoP appointing a Deputy of its choice to manage/liquidate my mom in law's ​ two and a half million pounds estate.
A very complexes machinery involving the memory assessment team, adult social services, the office of public guardian, and finally the official solicitor and the CoP were used with devastating consequences to us as a family.
My mom in law who is 86 and a retired head teacher started developing short term memory loss that became noticeable back in 2012.
After a short hospital stay, she was referred to the memory assessment team who quickly developed a strong interest in her estate.
When I objected to the intense scrutiny into her estate, a vicious campaign of demonization, slander and harassment started against me by adults social services aided by the local council.
I was accused of physical, financial, emotional abuse, and harassment of my mom in law. Every aspect of my private life was scrutinized by Social services in a quest to humiliate and discredit me. I plunged into depression when one day out with my mom in law, the social workers told the police that I have kidnapped her, the police removed her and turned her to the social workers who placed her in a nursing home for two months while refusing to let us see or talk to get.
My mom in law had in place a Power of Attorney in favour of her son and an acquaintance, back in 2007 when she stated to put her affairs in order.
In the end they revoked ​ two powers of Attorney, got a special order to sack her account of over £ 15.000 ​ that they never accounted for.
The CoP ignored the fact that the local authorities did not provide any evidence to support their allegations.
Instead the court named a Deputy, gave him power to liquidate the estate and barred me from ever seeing my mom in law.
Against my husband who is my mom in law's only child, they used his OCD condition to strip him of the PoA his mom gave him claiming he is not fit to run her affairs.
I am desperate to tell my story to anyone who will listen if only to inform the public and alleviate the pain I experience every waking moment knowing such corruption can be taking place away from public scrutiny in today's Britain
Hoping you might be able to guide and advise me, I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind Regard Marie Davis

MAY 26 2016 Visiter No.631561 to www.opg.me
as master and king, from servants

MAY 25 2016 Visiter No.631486 to www.opg.me

MAY 24 2016 Visiter No.631482 to www.opg.me
WANDA MADDOCKS makes a comment on FACEBOOK
from experience of course CLICK to enlarge

Wanda Maddocks if you look into her further down this website SHE. was the first person to be jailed by the court of protection and offers her advice. Wanda Maddocks Yes, i know exactly what you are going through, dont ever bring her back to England what ever you do, you are allowing her to live a lot longer by been professionaly cared for by your self, and loved, with a lovely healthy climate, --- keep up the good work, see if you are entitled to NHS continue funding for your mum over there, ---- extra money.

MAY 23 2016@9pm Visiter No.631436 to www.opg.me

MAY 23 2016 Visiter No.631393 to www.opg.me
You would think under normal circumstances that the effect this is having upon my 75 yr old disabled mothers life would be sufficient to do the right thing, but no, the forces of evil just carry on, in a sea of silence.
i: man, submitted a claim for demanded damages to be actioned immediately due to life endangerment, to the invoked jury court of QUEENS BENCH DIVISION 'action department', by recorded delivery one week ago and apart from the emailed version receiving an automated response confirming its delivery and of course the signed for receipt from the royal mail recorded delivery we have received nothing else what so ever!
This confirms the level of corrupt collusion and conspiracy to deny all rights to justice in a TALMUDIC operation conducted within her majesties courts that are indeed, in fact, registered corporations, believe it or not, where the oaths that these magistrates claim to uphold can be smokescreened, without asking the pertinent question of, which OATH are you upholding? the oath of court, the oath of office or the masonic oath??
THE deception and illusion of trickery/fraud being used upon an unsuspecting public that is thankfully getting very wise is beyond belief.
Crime by court officials of any level is all just part of their normal daily routine, in games they surely enjoy inflicting upon the affected.
The courts are actually doing exactly what was expected so its no surprise to me and therefore has little to no effect upon our fight apart from exposing their criminal collusion conspiracy of intent further, which is a bonus in our camp.
The tragedy to it along side the other injustices being suffered means that we have had to alter what we do to accomodate more income, that has been removed from my mother, meaning we can spend LESS time with her than before.
Its as though the court and siblings see my mother as a 'parcel' that can be passed from one to another at their convenience without a thought for her choices. WELL, its not 'pass the parcel' she is perfectly functional in the brain with who and where she wants to be and so to attempt to remove that by force seems inhumane, which is another word for breaching her human rights. The court have made mention very recently about her recent capacity which highlights how this corrupt courts expands as it goes, it's own goal posts, to meet its own demand for huge legal fees.
If you read all of this site you will see over the years how the criminal probate racketeering fraudsters have constantly made up new rules [expanding goalposts] to cover any and all eventuality cropping up. More recently I focus on a comment made by 'Judge Jackson' about if it was in my mothers best interests to live abroad? THIS is exactly by example how they function... forgetting that she has lived abroad for 8 years since 2008 when she 'emigrated' taking her out of their ENGLAND & WALES jurisdiction and that the court still fails to address the losses that they inflicted upon her by a forced living from £ sterling, in a devalueing pound that forced annual payments up to accomodate the deputies failings of EXCHANGE RATE losses that the court then have used with the newspapers to lay blame upon the carer!
The carer aint taking any what so ever blame and infact demands a common law trial by juror of those people named in the claim to shed light on the injustice suffered of substantial proportions and also where people are unaware that if laws are unjust as is the case here and its criminal backers being the poloticians whom refuse to act upon to change the laws, do not realise that a JURY can change LAWS. THIS is why they fear a jury?
THE truth is not something the governemnt want to deal with. THIS is another HILLSBOROUGH in the waiting but put a multiplier of 100 on it and that might show how explosive it will be.
In 2013 the mental capacity act select committee investigating all this LORD HARDIE stated, quote; " The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. The Government needs to go back to the drawing board to draft replacement provisions that are easy to understand and implement, and in keeping with the style and ethos of the Mental Capacity Act." but WHAT has changed?
Even such corrupt judges have weighed in, with ie Jacksons quote; " The law is completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised" but yet in contradiction his wikipiedia profile describes him as a master tactician who stalks his prey! [PREDATORY GUARDIAN] Its this kind of hypocrissy which is forcing LiPs litigants in person to fight their own cases but being met unlawfully by case dismissal with an endorsement accross it of 'without merit' and this should be followed by full reasoning by law, but usually is'nt, as in my case NO REASONS were given and to add insult to injury mine was followed with the further injustice of 'a 2 year civil restraint order' from making any further applications!
Recently I saw one guy comment on facebook about this which is listed as a picture here lower down, that his version of 'without merit' means , 'fuck off I am the judge and it is my duty to cover up the fuck ups of government', which in my opinion make the utmost sense!
In comments to one onlooker researching the court of protection who was asked about had there been any people released from it?? He responded by saying 'YES' all those who were in a box!!
NOW just look at it from afar and work it out for yourself.
WHO is protecting 'WHO'??
The criminals ie: the BAR [BRITISH ADMIRALTY RULE] are protecting the criminals ie: the BAR, backed by a 'corporate' Talmudic [zionist] court service that IS NOT repeat not related to her majesty, what so ever with smoke screen oaths in the main, MASONIC, demonstrating that the masonic linked HILLSBOROUGH tragedy is in comparison to this, SMALL!
I do hope people are getting the picture.
NOW the talmud court want to appoint the talmud official solicitor where his reputation goes before him in other cases whom have been defrauded by him the official solicitor.
ITS not an appointment of the official solicitor that's needed as THIS is just another arm, another branch of the same BAR fraud... IT's a JURY court that's needed... that's unbiased .. that can take lawful action in correcting the injustices.. where we do not subscribe to further injustices at my mothers expense.
What the BAR have done along with GOV.UK departments is a very very lucrative REVOLVING DOORS routine where you the innocent think you are going to get justice... and years pass by for example as in the HILLSBOROUGH case 27 years have passed by before a JURY was brought in to convict but yet their revolving doors still exist on other injustices like ours.. the same with complaints like the PHSO parliamentary health and service ombudsman they just go around and around reaching no particular goal.

MAY 20 2016 Visiter No.631292 to www.opg.me
in HIDING [click to enlarge]

MAY 18 2016 Visiter No.631200 to www.opg.me

confirmation email received 10.49am

MAY 18 2016 Visiter No.631197 to www.opg.me

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631157 to www.opg.me
Many Thanks for returning this to me.
I confirm contracts have been issued today.
I have made contact with Linder Myers and Pannone LLP in relation to the notices that appear on the title that will need to be removed.
I will contact you again once I receive any enquiries from the buyer’s solicitor.
Solicitor and Director
Conveyancing Department
Direct Dial 01253 629282
Whilst mums needs are now substantial especially where a permanent roof over head is concerned and now FOOD and medical needs that cannot be met due to the UK.government STOPPING her dissability payment and my care allowance totalling £600 per month THEY ALSO have a hold on her property which inturn may end up causing her death! PLEASE SOMEONE HELP!
The corrupt judge in this is 'jackson' his email address is his clerk - alexandra.morton@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631144 to www.opg.me

So you don't believe me?...Sure okay, I can respect that, you SHOULD question EVERYTHING. How about the U.S SUPREME COURT?...would you believe them for saying the same thing?
The Supreme Court Confirms, only the dead can appear in their "probate" courts. ALL CASES are just probate…so master that!
Maxim of Law: "Disparata Non Debent Jungi"; Latin: Dissimilar things ought not to be joined. PAPER to PAPER and flesh to flesh…. BUT NOT, PAPER to flesh or flesh to PAPER. The Maxim of Law of "like kind". This is why the "private" living being cannot appear in their courts or they are doomed to be turned into a coporation (trustee), and pay the price, literally.
flesh = a living private woman, a living private man jane doe, John Doe
PAPER = a fictitious contract entity, an artificial person, corporation – usually identied in all capital letters as an entity/ person such as: JANE DOE, JOHN DOE
Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54), SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL WO/MAN (not allowing yourself to be identified as a mere fiction; "person"s the key).
Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” Supreme Court Reporter S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631143 to www.opg.me

i: man: master and king attach demand instant damages ordered within such demand are per second charges of £1000 per second of delay i: man provide 48 hours to action demand based on delivery signed for this morning contained within is mention of life endangerment thus matter urgent
auto reply received at 13:05

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631141 to www.opg.me
There were queues of litigants in person at the courts, it appears after a recent article that the fat cat lawyers whom were taking all the money had pissed a lot of people off.
Anyway lots of squabbling to the point of security guards being called, of course this got through to the office staff.
The head of the courts got into an argument with Chancery and resigned his post grin emoticon... 50 people this week, 100 next week then 500 then 1000 screaming for justice no doubt.
So it appears they’re rejecting any LIP’s claims as with no merit in order to force them back to take solicitors.
They’re losing so much money due to Lip’s cases increasing by 40%.
So for a rejection, the answer is “ I conditionally accept what you say subject to proof of claim that your authority goes beyond the european Human rights judges” (rofl).

MAY 16 2016 Visiter No.631138 to www.opg.me

MAY 15 2016 Visiter No.631048 to www.opg.me

example 2 click to enlarge

eg 3

4 click to enlarge

MAY 14 2016 Visiter No.631019 to www.opg.me

receipt received
Thank you for your email.
Please note that messages received after 4:30pm may not be read until after 9.00am the following day.
If your email is regarding an active case in the Queen's Bench Action Department and does not comply with CPR Practice Direction 5B - Electronic communication and filing, contains multiple attachments, or a single attachment consisting of more than 10 pages your message will not be dealt with.

MAY 14 2016 Visiter No.630980 to www.opg.me
York, May 2nd 2016. Our intrepid reporter was present at today's hearing. Grandma B was also there. The court referred to her as "BH", as there are restrictions on reporting her name. Her loyal son Peter Hofschroer, whose name we can mention, was present via a video link.
As with last month's hearing, the video link was not set up so that Peter could see the court. He could only see the judge. Then the audio link was so bad that Peter could not hear what was going on. When Peter pointed out to the judge - Clive Heaton QC - that it was a basic premise of English law that justice has to be seen to be done and that there could only be a fair hearing if Peter could hear what was being said, the judge showed his characteristic contempt for the law and carried on regardless.
Grandma B was distraught that she was unable to converse with her loyal son, which was most likely the court's intention.
This is, of course, emotional abuse of Grandma B by which is perversely called the Court of "Protection".
The next hearing is due on May 16th 2016 at York Crown Court.
All Grandma B ever wanted was to be able to spend her last years living in her own home in peace and safety. Thanks to what Lord Maginnis has described in Parliament as "persecution" by North Yorkshire Police and York Social Services, this was not to be.
For more about this story please go to:

MAY 13 2016 Visiter No.630951 to www.opg.me

MAY 12 2016 Visiter No.630881 to www.opg.me
Dear who it may concern
re attached pdf or linked here http:​//opg.​me/peterdefaced.​pdf​ listed below
as a result me and my mum have moved address once more because of current actions by the corrupt court.
only this time we are effectively in hiding,,, no one will be receiving our current location along with only limited posts now on facebook
this court is indeed an organised criminal mafia gang of fraudsters and we stand on everything published on our website www.opg.me
mum is not owned by the court, she is, as i sovereign, god made and therefore answerable to god and a jury, as has been demanded time and time again
we attach our response to the corrupt court today with the order issued but now defaced with a refusal to contract so therefore void
we will shortly be filing our claim into Queens Bench addressing all relevant parties concerned with our claim to go before a jury
a truly shocking turn of events this all is and even more for mum in her late years to be robbed of her freedom by passport removal and also threat of a care home and internship within the United Kingdom.
I also cannot speak as I find on matters of crime which I believe is my duty to, but by doing so to be statute robbed of my rights to be thrown into prison as a whistle-blower of crime
my mothers losses have been claimed but not dealt with by bent judges, in fact ignored without mention of, during all proceedings
human rights breaches in abundance the UK cares not a dot with the CONSULATE, FOREIGN OFFICE and worst our MP Gordon Marsden sit idly by watching it happen and unfold without lifting a finger.
THE CRIME MINSTER too with cohort taking the MICHAEL GOVE has done nothing... it seems the UK s criminal actions are being extended worldwide upon pensioners who are at risk from them of being asset stripped or better termed financially raped with impunity, who also cannot emigrate or leave the UK in digust without first obtaining the permission of the criminal fraudsters whom are doing it, the court of protection proved and here linked in the what do they know question submitted to the OPG last week.. https:​//www.​whatdotheyknow.​com/request/moving_abroad#inco​ming-806771
Thank you for your email of 22 April 2016. In regards to a client moving abroad and taking their estate overseas with them, although this is in principle permitted, you are advised to contact the Court of Protection.
An additional Order may be required authorising the purchase of property, and a decision will be needed on whether the move abroad is in that client's best interests.
It is not something that the Office of the Public Guardian can authorise without prior approval from the Court.
It will also be necessary to contact the relevant authority in the foreign country to ensure that the equivalent of a deputyship or attorneyship can be set up to manage the client's needs.
As was documented on our website when we tried to do this 6 years ago the cost was €3000 and was to be born by the carer then IF SUCCESFUL can be claimed back from mothers estate clearly showing the court have made such a move impossible to make and therefore forced to live from £ sterling and the UK internship as a prisoner, breaching human rights.
On Monday next I have a meeting face to face with a journalist whom is flying out here to take our story in person.
Things can only get better as sadly they cannot get much worse as it would appear there is common purpose at work with the removal of mums disability allowance payment.
Our resolve grows stronger though by the day as does mums health and so our fight as long free will continue to what ever bitter end we must endure.
mike & ann

MAY 11 2016 Visiter No.630865 to www.opg.me

MAY 9 2016 Visiter No.630824 to www.opg.me

NOT acting in the best interests of my mother by again generating more fraudulent costs to her remaining depleted estate by court of protection corruption. AGAIN completely ignoring CLAIMED LOSSES that the court conveniently skips over to suit their own racketeering and looking to have respresentation by official solicitor when she clearly has an EXECUTOR under the terms of the living will to do just that!
Making further delays upon mums life and her human rights being trashed by a vicious inhumane gang of fraudsters that trade under the guise of protection clearly protecting only themselves and ALL outside their jurisdiction, noting down their complete disregard for my mother immediate care needs.

MAY 8 2016 Visiter No.630700 to www.opg.me

MAY 7 2016 Visiter No.630672 to www.opg.me
ADMIRALTY[their courts] v COMMON[our courts]
Anna von Reitz
I have written several articles that explain the simple FACT that we are supposed to have TWO functioning court systems operating in the behalf of the people --- one an admiralty court operating on the jurisdiction of the sea, one a common law court operating on the jurisdiction of the land. Duh, folks, how hard is this to grasp?
It's very plainly stated in the Constitution. Amendment VII. Read it.
So where are your Common Law Courts, given the further fact that all you ever see in the courthouses scattered across America are admiralty or administrative courts?
They've vanished, even though they are absolutely mandated.
So where are they? Answer: you haven't provided them for yourselves.
You have to provide your own government. You are supposed to be self-governing,. Remember? That means you have to elect and staff and support your Common Law Courts, because there is NO mandate in the Constitution for the "federal government" to provide these courts for you.
The Constitutoin is only concerned with setting up and running the federal government. And the federal government is only concerned with international and interstate affairs.
So, you won't find a lot of reference to the Common Law Court System in The Constitution, because it was taken for granted and was not the subject of The Constitution as a whole. Nonetheless, our American Common Law Court System was and deserves to be the dominant court system in America.
It's what you are owed and what you owe yourselves, along with your birthright standing as American State Nationals.
There are misguided and also self-interested souls wandering around saying that I am a "fake" judge. All those individuals are either (1) ignorant or (2) self-interested because they make money off the admiralty court system and are afraid of losing their gravy train, or (3) both.
As with everything else, you have to learn. You have to read. I can point things out to you, but it is up to you to think and to look around the corners.
Who has a vested interest in trying to keep Americans from exercising their right of self-governance? Who profits from suppressing or attempting to discredit the lawful work and standing of the American Common Law Courts and judges?
I think it is apparent that a whole roster of people have grown rich off the admiralty and administrative court system. I think that those same people have enjoyed the power of control and oppression of others that "owning the court system" has given them.
If you want justice, you must give it to yourselves. You must demand it and you must begin by building your own local jural societies, electing your court officers, your sheriffs on the land, and all the other vacated offices must be filled. Otherwise, the "money mill" that the courts have become will only grow more corrupt.
It is an ugly but common fault of human nature to want to control others and to profit from them. This despotism and oppression is something you can prevent if you act now and act decisively and intelligently in support of your own Common Law Courts.
See my earlier post at www.annavonreitz.com comparing and contrasting Common Law v. Admiralty in Our Courts v. THEIR Courts.

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630647 to www.opg.me
When Grandma B was abducted from her refuge in Germany in May 2014, eye-witnesses mention the presence of people from Britain with the German police, one of whom has been identified as her main abuser. North Yorkshire Police (NYP) and York Council have persistently denied that any of their officers were present.
However, we have now had sight of documents from an anonymous source inside NYP indicating that at least one of their officers was there.
One may ask what officers of NYP were doing in Germany. Apparently, this officer's role was to provide an English-speaker to converse with Grandma B.
Excuse me, but does the German police not have interpreters available, making it unnecessary to send over a group of officers from Britain, none of whom were likely to be able to speak German? Grandma B's refuge was just down the road from the RAF base at Guetersloh. If the German authorities had nobody suitable, would it not have been easier to find a suitable person there?
Then this part of Germany has been host to British armed forces since 1945.
Many local officials speak fluent English.
Why couldn't one of them have acted as interpreter? When the German police kidnapped Grandma B's carer Peter Hofschroer, the German police violently assaulted him then held him for four hours before releasing him without charge.
In that time, Grandma B's flat had been carefully searched and showed no signs of disturbance. However, both her passport and medical insurance card were missing, as well as a large sum of cash.
It would have taken a matter of minutes to search this small flat, but NYP officers were in it for four hours. They had access to Peter's laptop, which contained the evidence he has of NYP's criminal activities. It is likely his laptop was accessed and his data downloaded.
No "indecent images" were found then, and Peter was not charged in Germany. However, these images were found only after Peter returned to the UK.

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630645 to www.opg.me

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630618 to www.opg.me
1 LADY not needing a deputy




This is a lady that needs no deputy. This is a lady well educated that I have spoken to at length. THIS is just CoP crime at its absolute worst. We are coming for you!

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630612 to www.opg.me

MAY 5 2016 Visiter No.630590 to www.opg.me

MAY 5 2016 Visiter No.630585 to www.opg.me

MAY 5 2016 Visiter No.630580 to www.opg.me
LAWFUL REBELLION under article 61 of the

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630555 to www.opg.me

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630552 to www.opg.me

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630550 to www.opg.me

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630547 to www.opg.me

MAY 3 2016 Visiter No.630527 to www.opg.me

MAY 2 2016 Visiter No.630500 to www.opg.me

MAY 1 2016 Visiter No.630434 to www.opg.me

MAY 1 2016 Visiter No.630415 to www.opg.me

APRIL 29 2016 Visiter No.630370 to www.opg.me

APRIL 29 2016 Visiter No.630360 to www.opg.me

APRIL 28 2016 Visiter No.630320 to www.opg.me

APRIL 28 2016 Visiter No.630318 to www.opg.me

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630294 to www.opg.me

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630286 to www.opg.me

Trust me the next scandal on the horizon will be the court of 'protection' and as a prediction is proof that the courts, JEWdiciary, police, establishment have learned nothing as it is still going on in HEAPS of abundance.

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630268 to www.opg.me

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630249 to www.opg.me

APRIL 26 2016 Visiter No.630236 to www.opg.me

APRIL 25 2016 Visiter No.630200 to www.opg.me

APRIL 24 2016 Visiter No.630129 to www.opg.me

In a stitch up by the court of so called 'protection' who want to silence the whistleblower carer son of his 75yr. mothers estate being plundered by them, the court incite press to deliberately print a manufactured story to suit their own objectives in covering up their frauds when the old lady has capacity that can be proved and where money hungry relatives jump on the bandwagon to play to the courts tune.

APRIL 23 2016 Visiter No.630110 to www.opg.me

THE UK IS A COMMON LAW JURISDICTION - Magna Carta 1215 = The Great Charter and Due Process is by Trial by our Peers and LAWFUL representation of our own choosing:
Therefore, Mrs 'Justice' Aspin and her judicial working group has NO jurisdiction whatsoever to draw up any consultation regarding, We the People, as the UK judiciary have Sworn an Oath to be our Public Servants and have NO authority to operate courts without juries or make rules to OPPRESS, We the People, which is High Treason:
"A judicial working group led by Mrs Justice Asplin (pictured) drew up the consultation."
"On the issue of non-fee charging McKenzie friends, the judiciary said that current practice guidance does not have the force of law, and should be replaced with rules of court."
"the judiciary also recommends that all McKenzie friends sign up to a code of conduct, and that rules governing the courts’ approach to McKenzie friends be legally codified."
NOTE: Legally codified is not LAWFULLY codified:
COMMON LAW ← has been replaced with → MARITIME LAW = the People cannot win
TRIAL BY JURY ← has been replaced with → SUMMARY JUDGEMENT = the People cannot win
LAWFUL ADVICE ← has been replaced with → LEGAL ADVICE = the People cannot win
It is high time that the UK Judiciary started honouring their Oath to, We the People, and started acting LAWFULLY under the WRITTEN Constitutional Common Law of the Land = Magna Carta 1215
Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Legal Advice and the UK Judiciary.

APRIL 23 2016 Visiter No.630098 to www.opg.me

APRIL 23 2016 Visiter No.630090 to www.opg.me

APRIL 22 2016 Visiter No.630030 to www.opg.me

APRIL 21 2016 Visiter No.629978 to www.opg.me

LETTER to Gove requiring a public inquiry here

APRIL 19 2016 Visiter No.629945 to www.opg.me

“The Official State Office Known As "PERSON"
This is the single most important lesson that you MUST learn. If you spend an hour to learn this material you will be rewarded for the rest of your life.
The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which normally includes in its scope a variety of entities other than human beings. See e. g. 1 U. S. C. sec 1. Church of Scientology v. U. S. Dept. of Justice (1979) 612 F. 2d 417, 425.
One of the very first of your STATE statutes will have a section listed entitled "Definitions." Carefully study this section of the statutes and you will find a portion that reads similar to this excerpt.
In construing these statutes and each and every word, phrase, or part hereof, where the context will permit:
(1) The singular includes the plural and vice versa.
(2) Gender-specific language includes the other gender and neuter.
(3) The word "person" includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships, eSTATEs, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations.
Under the rule of construction "expressio unius est exclusio alterius," where a statute or Constitution enumerates the things on which it is to operate or forbids certain things, it is ordinarily to be construed as excluding from its operation all those not expressly mentioned.
Generally words in a statute should be given their plain and ordinary meaning. When a statute does not specifically define words, such words should be construed in their common or ordinary sense to the effect that the rules used in construing statutes are also applicable in the construction of the Constitution. It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that words of common usage when used in a statute should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense.
If you carefully read the statute laws enacted by your STATE legislature you will also notice that they are all written with phrases similar to these five examples :
1. A person commits the offense of failure to carry a license if the person ...
2. A person commits the offense of failure to register a vehicle if the person ...
3. A person commits the offense of driving uninsured if the person ...
4. A person commits the offense of fishing if the person ...
5. A person commits the offense of breathing if the person ...
Notice that only "persons" can commit these STATE legislature created crimes. A crime is by definition an offense committed against the "STATE." If you commit an offense against a human, it is called a tort. Examples of torts would be any personal injury, slander, or defamation of character.
So how does someone become a "person" and subject to regulation by STATE statutes and laws?
There is only one way. Contract! You must ask the STATE for permission to volunteer to become a STATE person. You must volunteer because the U. S. Constitution forbids the STATE from compelling you into slavery. This is found in the 13th and 14th Amendments.
13th Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United STATEs, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
14th Amendment: Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the STATE wherein they reside. No STATE shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any STATE deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
You become a STATE created statutory "person" by taking up residency with the STATE and stepping into the office of "person." You must hold an "office" within the STATE government in order for that STATE government to regulate and control you. First comes the legislatively created office, then comes their control. If you do not have an office in STATE government, the legislature's control over you would also be prohibited by the Declaration of Rights section, usually found to be either Section I or II, of the STATE Constitution.
The most common office held in a STATE is therefore the office known as "person." Your STATE legislature created this office as a way to control people. It is an office most people occupy without even knowing that they are doing so.
The legislature cannot lawfully control you because you are a flesh and blood human being. God alone created you and by Right of Creation, He alone can control you. It is the nature of Law, that what One creates, One controls. This natural Law is the force that binds a creature to its creator. God created us and we are, therefore, subject to His Laws, whether or not we acknowledge Him as our Creator.
The way the STATE gets around God's Law and thereby controls the People is by creating only an office, and not a real human. This office is titled as "person" and then the legislature claims that you are filling that office. Legislators erroneously now think that they can make laws that also control men. They create entire bodies of laws - motor vehicle code, building code, compulsory education laws, and so on ad nauseum. They still cannot control men or women, but they can now control the office they created. And look who is sitting in that office -- YOU.
Then they create government departments to administer regulations to these offices. Within these administrative departments of STATE government are hundreds of other STATE created offices. There is everything from the office of janitor to the office of governor. But these administrative departments cannot function properly unless they have subjects to regulate.
The legislature obtains these subjects by creating an office that nobody even realizes to be an official STATE office.
They have created the office of "person."
The STATE creates many other offices such as police officer, prosecutor, judge etc. and everyone understands this concept. However, what most people fail to recognize and understand is the most common STATE office of all, the office of "person." Anyone filling one of these STATE offices is subject to regulation by their creator, the STATE legislature. Through the STATE created office of "person," the STATE gains its authority to regulate, control and judge you, the real human. What they have done is apply the natural law principle, "what one creates, one controls."
A look in Webster's dictionary reveals the origin of the word "person." It literally means "the mask an actor wears."
The legislature creates the office of "person" which is a mask. They cannot create real people, only God can do that. But they can create the "office" of "person," which is merely a mask, and then they persuade a flesh and blood human being to put on that mask by offering a fictitious privilege, such as a driver license. Now the legislature has gained complete control over both the mask and the actor behind the mask.
A resident is another STATE office holder.
All STATE residents hold an office in the STATE government.
But not everyone who is a resident also holds the office of "person."
Some residents hold the office of judge and they are not persons.
Some residents hold the office of prosecutors and they are not persons.
Some residents hold the office of police office(rs) and they are not persons.
Some residents hold the office of legislators and they are not persons.
Some residents are administrators and bureaucrats and they also are not persons.
Some residents are attorneys and they also are not persons.
An attorney is a STATE officer of the court and is firmly part of the judicial branch. The attorneys will all tell you that they are "licensed" to practice law by the STATE Supreme Court. Therefore, it is unlawful for any attorney to hold any position or office outside of the judicial branch. There can be no attorney legislators - no attorney mayors - no attorneys as police - no attorneys as governor. Yes, I know it happens all the time, however, this practice of multiple office holding by attorneys is prohibited by the individual State and U.S. Constitutions and is a felony in most STATEs.
If you read farther into your STATE constitution you will find a clause stating this, the Separation of Powers, which will essentially read as follows:
Branches of government -- The powers of the STATE government shall be divided into legislative, executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any powers appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided herein.
Therefore, a police officer cannot arrest a prosecutor, a prosecutor cannot prosecute a sitting judge, a judge cannot order the legislature to perform and so on.
Because these "offices" are not persons, the STATE will not, and cannot prosecute them, therefore they enjoy almost complete protection by the STATE in the performance of their daily duties. This is why it is impossible to sue or file charges against most government employees. If their crimes should rise to the level where they "shock the community" and cause alarm in the people, then they will be terminated from STATE employment and lose their absolute protection. If you carefully pay attention to the news, you will notice that these government employees are always terminated from their office or STATE employment and then are they arrested, now as a common person, and charged for their crimes. Simply put, the STATE will not eat its own.
The reason all STATE residents hold an office is so the STATE can control everything. It wants to create every single office so that all areas of your life are under the complete control of the STATE. Each office has prescribed duties and responsibilities and all these offices are regulated and governed by the STATE. If you read the fine print when you apply for a STATE license or privilege you will see that you must sign a declaration that you are in fact a "resident" of that STATE.
"Person" is a subset of resident. Judge is a subset of resident. Legislator and police officer are subsets of resident. If you hold any office in the STATE, you are a resident and subject to all legislative decrees in the form of statutes.
They will always say that we are free men. But they will never tell you that the legislatively created offices that you are occupying are not free.
They will say, "All men are free," because that is a true statement.
What they do not say is, that holding any STATE office binds free men into slavery for the STATE. They are ever ready to trick you into accepting the STATE office of "person," and once you are filling that office, you cease to be free men. You become regulated creatures, called persons, totally created by the legislature. You will hear "free men" mentioned all the time, but you will never hear about "free persons."
If you build your life in an office created by the legislature, it will be built on shifting sands. The office can be changed and manipulated at any time to conform to the whims of the legislature. When you hold the office of "person" created by the legislature, your office isn't fixed. Your duties and responsibilities are ever changing. Each legislative session binds a "person" to ever more burdens and requirements in the form of more rules, laws and statutes.
Most STATE constitutions have a section that declares the fundamental power of the People: Political power -- All political power is inherent in the People. The enunciation herein of certain Rights shall not be construed to deny or impair others retained by the People.
Notice that this says "people" it does not say persons. This statement declares beyond any doubt that the People are Sovereign over their created government. This is natural law of creation and the natural flow of delegated power.
A Sovereign is a private, non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, non-individual, NOT SUBJECT to any real or imaginary statutory regulations or quasi laws enacted by any STATE legislature which was created by the People.
When you are pulled over by the police, roll down your window and say, "You are speaking to a Sovereign political power holder. I do not consent to you detaining me. Why are you detaining me against my will?"
Now the STATE office of policeman knows that "IT" is talking to a flesh and blood Sovereign. The police officer cannot cite a Sovereign because the STATE legislature can only regulate what they create. And the STATE does not create Sovereign political power holders. It is very important to lay the proper foundation, Right from the beginning. Let the police officer know that you are a Sovereign. Remain in your proper office of Sovereign political power holder. Do not leave it. Do not be persuaded by police pressure or tricks to put on the mask of a STATE "person."
Why aren't Sovereigns subject to the STATE's charges? Because of the concept of office. The STATE is attempting to prosecute only a particular office known as "person." If you are not in that STATE created office of "person," the STATE statutes simply do not apply to you. This is common sense, for example, if you are not in the STATE of Texas, then Texas laws do not apply to you. For the STATE to control someone, they have to first create the office. Then they must coerce a warm-blooded creature to come fill that office. They want you to fill that office.
Here is the often expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court, that "in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the word person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U. S. 653, 667 (1979) (quoting United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U. S. 600, 604 (1941)). See also United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U. S. 258, 275 (1947).
The idea that the word "person" ordinarily excludes the Sovereign can also be traced to the "familiar principle that the King is not bound by any act of Parliament unless he be named therein by special and particular words." Dollar Savings Bank v. United STATEs, 19 Wall. 227, 239 (1874).
As this passage suggests, however, this interpretive principle applies only to "the enacting Sovereign." United States v. California, 297 U. S. 175, 186 (1936). See also Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Assn., Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 460 U. S. 150, 161, n. 21 (1983).
Furthermore, as explained in United States v. Herron, 20 Wall. 251, 255 (1874), even the principle as applied to the enacting Sovereign is not without limitations: "Where an act of Parliament is made for the public good, as for the advancement of religion and justice or to prevent injury and wrong, the king is bound by such act, though not particularly named therein; but where a statute is general, and thereby any prerogative, Right, title, or interest is divested or taken from the king, in such case the king is not bound, unless the statute is made to extend to him by express words."
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Holmes explained: "A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends." Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U. S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907).
The majority of American STATEs fully embrace the Sovereign immunity theory as well as the federal government. See Restatement (Second) of Torts 895B, comment at 400 (1979).
The following U. S. Supreme Court case makes clear all these principals.
I shall have occasion incidentally to evince, how true it is, that STATEs and governments were made for man; and at the same time how true it is, that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and at last oppressed their master and maker.
... A STATE, useful and valuable as the contrivance is, is the inferior contrivance of man; and from his native dignity derives all its acquired importance. ...
Let a STATE be considered as subordinate to the people: But let everything else be subordinate to the STATE. The latter part of this position is equally necessary with the former. For in the practice, and even at length, in the science of politics there has very frequently been a strong current against the natural order of things, and an inconsiderate or an interested disposition to sacrifice the end to the means. As the STATE has claimed precedence of the people; so, in the same inverted course of things, the government has often claimed precedence of the STATE; and to this perversion in the second degree, many of the volumes of confusion concerning Sovereignty owe their existence. The ministers, dignified very properly by the appellation of the magistrates, have wished, and have succeeded in their wish, to be considered as the Sovereigns of the STATE. This second degree of perversion is confined to the old world, and begins to diminish even there: but the first degree is still too prevalent even in the several STATES, of which our union is composed. By a STATE I mean, a complete body of free persons united together for their common benefit, to enjoy peaceably what is their own, and to do justice to others. It is an artificial person. It has its affairs and its interests: It has its rules: It has its Rights: and it has its obligations. It may acquire property distinct from that of its members. It may incur debts to be discharged out of the public stock, not out of the private fortunes of individuals. It may be bound by contracts; and for damages arising from the breach of those contracts. In all our contemplations, however, concerning this feigned and artificial person, we should never forget, that, in truth and nature, those who think and speak and act, are men. Is the foregoing description of a STATE a true description? It will not be questioned, but it is. .... See Our Enemy The State
It will be sufficient to observe briefly, that the Sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the Sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere. That system contemplates him as being the fountain of honor and authority; and from his grace and grant derives all franchise, immunities and privileges; it is easy to perceive that such a Sovereign could not be amenable to a court of justice, or subjected to judicial control and actual constraint. It was of necessity, therefore, that suability, became incompatible with such Sovereignty. Besides, the prince having all the executive powers, the judgment of the courts would, in fact, be only monitory, not mandatory to him, and a capacity to be advised, is a distinct thing from a capacity to be sued. The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence, and constantly remind us of the distinction between the prince and the subject.
"No such ideas obtain here (speaking of America): at the revolution, the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the Sovereigns of the country, but they are Sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called) and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the Sovereignty." Chisholm v. Georgia (February Term, 1793) 2 U. S. 419, 2 Dall. 419, 1 L. Ed 440. There are many ways you can give up your Sovereign power and accept the role of "person." One is by receiving STATE benefits. Another is by asking permission in the form of a license or permit from the STATE.
One of the subtlest ways of accepting the role of "person," is to answer the questions of bureaucrats. When a STATE bureaucrat knocks on your door and wants to know why your children aren't registered in school, or a police officer pulls you over and starts asking questions, you immediately fill the office of "person" if you start answering their questions.
It is for this reason that you should ignore or refuse to "answer" their questions and instead act like a true Sovereign, a King or Queen, and ask only your own questions of them.
You are not a "person" subject to their laws.
If they persist and haul you into their court unlawfully, your response to the judge is simple and direct, you the Sovereign, must tell him:
I have no need to answer you in this matter.
It is none of your business whether I understand my Rights or whether I understand your fictitious charges.
It is none of your business whether I want counsel.
The reason it is none of your business is because I am not a person regulated by the STATE. I do not hold any position or office where I am subject to the legislature. The STATE legislature does not dictate what I do.
I am a free Sovereign "Man"(or woman) and I am a political power holder as lawfully decreed in the STATE Constitution at article I (or II) and that constitution is controlling over you.
You must NEVER retain or hire an attorney, a STATE officer of the court, to speak or file written documents for you. Use an attorney (if you must) only for counsel and advice about their "legal" system. If you retain an attorney to represent you and speak in your place, you become "NON COMPOS MENTIS", not mentally competent, and you are then considered a ward of the court. You LOSE all your Rights, and you will not be permitted to do anything herein.
The judge knows that as long as he remains in his office, he is backed by the awesome power of the STATE, its lawyers, police and prisons. The judge w ill try to force you to abandon your Sovereign sanctuary by threatening you with jail. No matter what happens, if you remain faithful to your Sovereignty, The judge and the STATE may not lawfully move against you.
The STATE did not create the office of Sovereign political power holder. Therefore, they do not regulate and control those in the office of Sovereign. They cannot ascribe penalties for breach of that particular office. The reason they have no authority over the office of the Sovereign is because they did not create it and the Sovereign people did not delegate to them any such power.
When challenged, simply remind them that they do not regulate any office of the Sovereign and that their statutes only apply to those STATE employees in legislative created offices.
This Sovereign individual paradigm is explained by the following U. S. Supreme Court case: "The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the STATE, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the STATE, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43 at 47 (1905).
Let us analyze this case. It says, "The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights." It does not say, "Sit on his Rights." There is a principle here: "If you don't use 'em you lose 'em." You have to assert your Rights, demand them, "stand upon" them.
Next it says, "He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way." It says "private business" - you have a Right to operate a private business. Then it says "in his own way." It doesn't say "in the government's way."
Then it says, "His power to contract is unlimited." As a Sovereign individual, your power to contract is unlimited. In common law there are certain criteria that determine the validity of contracts. They are not important here, except that any contract that would harm others or violate their Rights would be invalid. For example, a "contract" to kill someone is not a valid contract. Apart from this obvious qualification, your power to contract is unlimited.
Next it says, "He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the STATE, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property." The court case contrasted the duty of the corporation (an entity created by government permission - feudal paradigm) to the duty of the Sovereign individual. The Sovereign individual doesn't need and didn't receive permission from the government, hence has no duty to the government.
Then it says, "His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the STATE." This is very important. The Supreme Court recognized that humans have inherent Rights. The U. S. Constitution (including the Bill of Rights) does not grant us Rights. We have fundamental Rights, irrespective of what the Constitution says. The Constitution acknowledges some of our Rights. And Amendment IX STATEs, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain Rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The important point is that our Rights antecede (come before, are senior to) the organization of the STATE.
Next the Supreme Court says, "And [his Rights] can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution." Does it say the government can take away your Rights? No! Your Rights can only be taken away "by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution." "Due process of law" involves procedures and safeguards such as trial by jury. "Trial By Jury" means, inter alia, the jury judges both law and fact.
Then the case says, "Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law." These are some of the Rights of a Sovereign individual. Sovereign individuals need not report anything about themselves or their businesses to anyone.
Finally, the Supreme Court says, "He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." The Sovereign individual does not have to pay taxes.
If you should discuss Hale v. Henkel with a run-of-the-mill attorney, he or she will tell you that the case is "old" and that it has been "overturned." If you ask that attorney for a citation of the case or cases that overturned Hale v. Henkel, there will not be a meaningful response. We have researched Hale v. Henkel and here is what we found :
"We know that Hale v. Henkel was decided in 1905 in the U. S. Supreme Court.
Since it was the Supreme Court, the case is binding on all courts of the land, until another Supreme Court case says it isn't. Has another Supreme Court case overturned Hale v. Henkel? The answer is NO. As a matter of fact, since 1905, the Supreme Court has cited Hale v. Henkel a total of 144 times. A fact more astounding is that since 1905, Hale v. Henkel has been cited by all of the federal and STATE appellate court systems a total of over 1600 times. None of the various issues of this case has ever been overruled.
So if the STATE through the office of the judge continues to threaten or does imprison you, they are trying to force you into the STATE created office of "person." As long as you continue to claim your Rightful office of Sovereign, the STATE lacks all jurisdiction over you. The STATE needs someone filling the office of "person" in order to continue prosecuting a case in their courts.
A few weeks in jail puts intense pressure upon most "persons." Jail means the loss of job opportunities, separation from loved ones, and the piling up of debts. Judges will apply this pressure when they attempt to arraign you. When brought in chains before a crowded courtroom the issue of counsel will quickly come up and you can tell the court you are In Propria Persona or simply "PRO PER", as yourself and you need no other.
Do not sign their papers or cooperate with them because most things about your life are private and are not the STATE's business to evaluate. Here is the Sovereign People's command in the constitution that the STATE respect their privacy:
Right of privacy -- Every man or woman has the Right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into their private life except as otherwise provided herein. This section shall not be construed to limit the public's Right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law. See U.S. Constitution, Ninth Amendment
If the judge is stupid enough to actually follow through with his threats and send you to jail, you will soon be released without even being arraigned and all charges will be dropped. You will then have documented prima facie grounds for false arrest and false imprisonment charges against him personally.
Now that you know the hidden evil in the word "person", try to stop using it in everyday conversation. Simply use the correct term, MAN or WOMAN. Train yourself, your family and your friends to never use the derogatory word "person" ever again.
This can be your first step in the journey to get yourself free from all STATE control

APRIL 18 2016 Visiter No.629814 to www.opg.me

APRIL 18 2016 Visiter No.629800 to www.opg.me
click to enlarge

Mike Clarke when birds of a feather flock together ie the theiving CoP and siblings this is the result after 20 years of looking after mum

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629772 to www.opg.me
STATEMENT by[sister daughter]ANGELA WILD &[brother son]KEVIN CLARKE

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629770 to www.opg.me
Dave John Clapham
Bias and the appearance of bias
3.7 The question whether an appearance of bias or possible conflict of interest is sufficient to disqualify a Justice from taking part in a particular case is the subject of United Kingdom and Strasbourg jurisprudence which will guide the Justices in specific situations. Recent UK cases include Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357, Locobail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd [2002] QB 451, Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No.2) [2001] 1 WLR 700 and Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] 1 WLR 2416.
3.8 Circumstances will vary infinitely and guidelines can do no more than seek to assist the individual Justice in the judgment to be made, which involves, by virtue of the authorities, considering the perception the fair-minded and informed observer would have. What follows are merely signposts to some of the questions which may arise.
3.9 A Justice will not sit in a case where:
he or she has a close family relationship with a party or with the spouse or domestic partner of a partner; his or her spouse or domestic partner was a judge in a court below; he or she has a close family relationship with an advocate appearing before the Supreme Court.
3.10 Sufficient reasons for not sitting on a case include:
personal friendship with, or personal animosity towards, a party; friendship is to be distinguished from acquaintance, which may or may not be a sufficient reason depending upon its nature and extent; current or recent business association with a party; this includes the Justice's own solicitor, accountant, doctor, dentist or other professional adviser; it does not normally include the Justice's insurance company, bank or a local authority to which he or she pays council tax.
3.11 Reasons which are unlikely to be sufficient for a Justice not to sit on a case, but will depend upon the circumstances, include:
friendship or past professional association with counsel or solicitors acting for a party; the fact that a relative of the Justice is a partner in, or employee of, a firm of solicitors or other professional advisers involved in a case; much will depend upon the extent to which that relative is involved in or affected by the result in the case; past professional association with a party as a client; much will depend upon how prolonged, close, or recent that association was.
3.12 A Justice will not sit in a case in which he or she or, to his or her knowledge, a member of his or her family has any significant financial interest in the outcome of the case. 'Family' for this purpose means spouse, domestic partner or other person in a close personal relationship with the Justice; son, son-in-law, daughter, daughter-in-law; and anyone else who is a companion or employee living in the Justice's household. It is for the Justice to inform himself or herself about his or her personal financial and fiduciary interests and to take reasonable steps to be informed about the interests of members of his or her family.
3.13 A significant financial interest could arise, not from an interest in the outcome of the particular case, but where the decision on the point of law might have an impact upon the Justice's own financial interests. The Justice will have regard to the nature and extent of his or her interest and the effect of the decision on others with whom he or she has a relationship, actual or foreseeable.
3.14 Previous participation in public office or public debate on matters relevant to an issue in a case will not normally be a cause for a Justice not to sit, unless the Justice has thereby committed himself or herself to a particular view irrespective of the arguments presented to the Court. This risk will seldom, if ever, arise from what a judge has said in other cases, or from previous findings against a party in other litigation.
3.15 If circumstances which may give rise to a suggestion of bias, or the appearance of bias, are present, they should be disclosed to the parties well before the hearing, if possible. Otherwise the parties may be placed in a difficult position when deciding whether or not to proceed. Sometimes, however, advance notification may not be possible.
3.16 Disclosure should be to all parties and, unless the issue has been resolved before the hearing, discussion should be in open court. Even where the parties consent to the Justice sitting, the Justice should refuse himself or herself if, on balance, he or she considers that this is the proper course. Conversely, there are likely to be cases in which the Justice has thought it appropriate to bring the circumstances to the attention of the parties but, having considered any submissions, is entitled to and may rightly decide to proceed notwithstanding the lack of consent.

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629752 to www.opg.me

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629750 to www.opg.me

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629743 to www.opg.me
“We were very concerned by what we heard about the safeguards. The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. Worse still, in some cases the safeguards are being wilfully used to oppress individuals and to force decisions upon them. The Government needs to go back to the drawing board to draft replacement provisions that are easy to understand and implement, and in keeping with the style and ethos of the Mental Capacity Act.”
Lord Hardie, House of Lords Mental Capacity Act Committee report

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629740 to www.opg.me
click to enlarge

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629737 to www.opg.me

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629725 to www.opg.me

APRIL 16 2016 Visiter No.629700 to www.opg.me
EU vote OUT get OUT & stay OUT for the sake of your children

APRIL 15 2016 Visiter No.629650 to www.opg.me


APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629614 to www.opg.me

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629600 to www.opg.me

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629595 to www.opg.me

Guy documents on video the terrorist ordeal of what is going down in United Kingdom courts systems.

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629590 to www.opg.me

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629580 to www.opg.me

APRIL 13 2016 Visiter No.629540 to www.opg.me

APRIL 13 2016 Visiter No.629526 to www.opg.me
In this order from the court it shows how the court will use relatives to back their objectives which is especially easy when ''birds of a feather flock together''.
I have previously documented my sisters actions of theft upon her own mother.
Here I will document in more detail.
REPLY here

APRIL 12 2016 Visiter No.629500 to www.opg.me

APRIL 11 2016 Visiter No.629460 to www.opg.me


FACEBOOK link here

12.4.2016 Michael Cray's facebook page has just been taken down this morning whooo ray we are onto this criminal thus who lives in PEMBROKESHIRE.

APRIL 11 2016 Visiter No.629445 to www.opg.me

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629425 to www.opg.me
COPY To: Mike: Clarke
Date: April 10, 2016 at 8:41 PM Subject: Dear judge.
My name is Steven Power and as well as being a long term friend of the Clark family I'm the Builder charged with maintaining the property at 31 Cherry Tree Road Blackpool.
Being aware of the dispute between family members regarding the sale of the property I felt as the Builder I should inform you of the current situation.
About 8 months ago Mr Michael Clarke asked me if is as a friend and due to his lack of funds I would be prepared at my expense to bring the property up to a saleable level and then market it on their behalf.
I agreed to do this on condition that my bill would be paid out of the proceeds of the sale.
At the time the property has stood empty for approximately 18 months and was in a very poor state, slates and come off the roof and rain water had brought some of the ceilings down amongst numerous other defects.
I estimated it would cost approximately £15,000 to put the property back to a habitable condition in any event I carried out all the very basic repairs I deemed necessary to make it saleable at a cost of £2,000
After numerous viewings an offer of £180,000 was received this was reduced to £170,000 after receipt of the survey paid for by the perspective purchaser.
In spite of a very thorough Surveyors report highlighting all the problems with the property the purchasers are still very keen to buy it with a cash offer of £170,000
In my view this is I a extremely good offer and is unlikely to be repeated in the future as the property is slowly deteriorating.
Having discussed the deteriorating state of the property with Angela Clarke she informed me that she has no problem with selling the bungalow provided the funds are put into the court for distribution as the court sees fit.
Having known the family in excess of 35 years and being fully aware of the family's dispute regarding Ann Clarke it is my opinion that she will never be returning to the UK and in the unlikely event that she does would not be able to afford to bring the property up to a habitable standard.
Furthermore the property is currently uninsured and has been for some years. There is an ever increasing council tax liability, and the longer it remains empty the more maintenance it will require.
In short a financial liability. I have attached the surveyors report to give you some insight to the reality of the situation.
ON THE ABOVE FAO the foreign office via British Consulate Dominic for select committee or a LORD or MP that will ACT!
TAKE NOTE: from mike@rake.net
i man mike@rake.net do strongly object and demand in the highest possible terms that the court of protection play absolutely NO FURTHER future role in mums affairs.
THEY have attempted to take us as UK prisoners. ALL documented on our website www.opg.me
OUR suffering continues daily.SURVEYfor31.pdf

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629410 to www.opg.me

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629400 to www.opg.me
Grandma B's only wish was to spend her remaining years living in her own home in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son Peter.
Sadly, a criminal gang centred around North Yorkshire Police and York Social Services had a different future for her in mind. They seized and attempted to fraudulently sell her house. She fought this through the due process of law. To prevent her from litigating, her abusers kidnapped her in May 2014. When her son Peter went to court to get her back in his care, he was ambushed in the court doorway and has been held unlawfully in jail ever since.
Grandma B's house has now been fraudulently sold. The sinister and secretive Court of Protection now plans to issue a Deprivation of Liberty Order to prevent her friends from contacting her. The next court hearing is on 13th April 2016 at York County Court. (Case No. 12530345.) Please attend to show your support of Grandma B - and be prepared to insist on getting access to the courtroom.

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629390 to www.opg.me

APRIL 9 2016 Visiter No.629385 to www.opg.me
There are 350,000 freemasons in Britain. If you get to the 33rd degree like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown or David Cameron you are then in the running to be a Bilderberger.
Bilderbergers are a higher, international, more exclusive level of freemasonry, only 140 strong, and their agenda is to build the EU dictatorship. Every Prime Minister since Edward Heath has been a Bilderberger, and they have controlled the leadership of the Conservative party since the late 1960's.
The Rothschilds and the Queen are members of the top two levels; and our German Royal Family (real name Saxe-Coburg Gotha; Windsor is an adopted name) has always been head of freemasonry.
Nearly all British judges and Law Lords are Freemasons; so are most barristers, which is why miscarriages of justice are the norm in our now utterly corrupt British Courts.
Judges and Freemasonry barristers usually decide the outcome of a case to suit their own agenda beforehand. That agenda is often implementing the Frankfurt School subversion technique of "trauma through injustice," particularly in our now secret family courts, where they snatch 4,500 children annually from good parents for forced adoption. The Daily Mail covers a tiny number of those cases.
Our corrupt freemasonry Law Lords refuse to rule the EU wholly illegal under our British constitution, which it is. They lead the pretence our written British constitution is unwritten, to render it worthless.
Current Conservative Bilderbergers include Francis Maude and Ken Clarke, apparently a DVD agent too; David Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne. Lib Dems: Nick Clegg. Labour: Ed Balls, David Millliband (DVD too), Peter Mandleson, John Sainsbury, Philip Gould; Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. These evil men are deliberately destroying us every day.
Newspapers are censored for legal reasons by freemasonry lawyers or Common Purpose members; and the BBC has 400 Common Purpose staff censoring out anti-EU news, which is why they didn't report that Westminster gave up the last 20% of its power in January 2009, and now only exists to help the press conceal what has happened, until the EU dictatorship has consolidated its power.

APRIL 9 2016 Visiter No.629363 to www.opg.me

APRIL 8 2016 Visiter No.629320 to www.opg.me
Thank you Dominic of the consulate
In you I trust.
I can further confirm that as of yesterday mum has been released from hospital and is back in my care.
Having said that she is still quite delicate and I am hoping that her release is the start of a full recovery.
Our situation is still of course very precarious and the lack of action from our MP on this matter is very troubling.
More recently mums disability benefit has been stopped and my carers allowance, providing even more added pressure daily.
I am of the understanding that if this matter is put before the parliamentary select committee that any MP so willing can take up the case.
Might it be possible that this matter can be raised by the FOREIGN OFFICE to the select committee??
Alternatively I am also of the understanding that if a LORD takes up the matter he can instruct an MP to ACT!
THE situation is an in depth one which stems as previously told from corruption being covered up by court of protection officials and judiciary whom are not wishing to deal with the allegations to hand and thus forth rely on a fraudulent court setting of harassment, in order to silence the carer for whistleblowing, into prison or he is coerced into apologising for a sworn on oath statement of truth 'COMMERCIAL LIEN' notarised, of which I cannot do, as I would be in contempt of such truth.
I cannot be in contempt of the court and of the truth??
JUDGE JACKSONs responsibility to the 7 principles of PUBLIC LIFE he has failed on all counts.

APRIL 8 2016 Visiter No.629317 to www.opg.me
From: mike rake.net [mailto:mike@rake.net] Sent: 07 April 2016 17:29
To: Dominic Jackson
Are my emails being forwarded to the foreign office and MP because as of yet there has been absolutely NO RESPONSE from anyone?

from dominic.jackson@fco.gov.uk Dominic BRITISH CONSULATE MALAGA SPAIN
To mike@rake.net
Dear Mike
Rest assured I am forwarding all the emails you are asking to be forwarded to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to colleagues in London and I have asked them to ensure Gordon Marsden MP is informed.
I will endeavour to follow-up with them and find out if they are able to reply.

APRIL 8 2016 Visiter No.629315 to www.opg.me

1. Selflessness
Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
2. Integrity
Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
3. Objectivity
Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
4. Accountability
Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
5. Openness
Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
6. Honesty
Holders of public office should be truthful.
7. Leadership
Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.
All demonstrating clearly that his honour Mr Justice Jackson has a BIASED streak that runs right through his body that clearly is violating all the basic principles of holding public office.

APRIL 7 2016 Visiter No.629280 to www.opg.me

APRIL 7 2016 Visiter No.629270 to www.opg.me

Talmudic law imposes the will of the court.

APRIL 6 2016 Visiter No.629237 to www.opg.me
-----Original Message-----
From: Alpha14 To: Undisclosed Recipients
Sent: Tue, Apr 5, 2016 09:43 AM
This is a vitally important matter. Please forward to every person you know.
In 1960, the Lord Chancellor Lord Kilmuir wrote to Edward Heath advising him that if Britain joined the European Economic Community, it would be contrary to English Constitutional Law.
Heath went ahead anyway and in 1972 signed the European Communities Act (ECA) in full knowledge that he was treasonably committing Britain to foreign rule over the heads of the people whom he had deceived with lies that no sovereignty would be lost.
His signing the ECA was the most grievous act of high treason in British history. But it also rendered his government an unlawful assembly with no effect in law (as treason can have no effect in law) and as all subsequent parliaments have failed to reverse his treachery, they too have been unlawful assemblies having no legislative power, incapable of any lawful act of government.
Successive EU Treaties are therefore of no effect and Britain’s “membership” of the EU has been null and void from the outset.
The petition https:​//petition.​parliament.​uk/petitions/122770​ seeks to bring Lord Kilmuir’s letter out into the open so that its content would be debated in Parliament and be discussed openly in public as it has considerable bearing on Britain’s relationship with the EU, the billions of pounds we waste daily on the EU and the many thousands of illegal foreign “laws” with which we are unlawfully burdened every day. Lord Kilmuir’s letter to Heath appears below with comments in red by Joan Martin, Editor of S.O.S - Save Our Sovereignty.
Though the petition has a deadline after the date set for a British EU Referendum, there is no guarantee that the referendum result will reflect the people’s true intention or indeed the best outcome for Britain and our future generations.
The possibility of bringing this momentous issue sufficiently to the public’s attention rests entirely upon the willingness of the people themselves to forward it to everyone they know when every person has the right to be aware of such a serious matter effecting their lives but which has so far been deliberately withheld from them.
PLEASE send this email to your MP drawing particular attention to the following, ask his or her thoughts and let me know their response. Please also forward this very widely asking recipients to do likewise. Rex Poulton
alpha14@wewantourcountryback.​co.​uk​ -----Original Message-----
From: Sent: 31 March 2016 14:03 To: Subject: THE KILMUIR LETTER - THE PUBLIC NEED TO KNOW
The following was passed to me by the Editor, Joan Martin. Sonya S.O.S - Save Our Sovereignty Sovereignty - The ability to rule ourselves and make our own laws.
In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the Council or other appropriate organ of the Community, its substantive powers of legislating over the whole of a very important field.
There is no constitutionally acceptable method of doing this because it would be tantamount to a total abrogation of their duty to govern us according to our laws and customs.
In answer to a letter from Edward Heath written on the 30 November 1960 Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, makes it plain that there are very real problems with the constitutional limitations imposed on Government that prevent our joining the EEC. He goes on to mention some ways in which the Constitution will conflict with Heath’s plans but also indicate ways of subverting the conflict.
The comments in red, interleaved in Lord Kilmuir’s letter, clearly show that the Heath Government was fully prepared to commit acts of sedition and treason in order to take the UK into the EEC. Unfortunately we do not have a copy of Heath’s original letter to Lord Kilmuir.
My Dear Ted,
You wrote to me on the 30th November about the constitutional implications of our becoming a party to the Treaty of Rome.
I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me.
I agree with you that there are important constitutional issues involved. I have no doubt that if we do sign the Treaty, we shall suffer some loss of sovereignty, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.
At the end of the day, the issue whether or not to join the European Economic Community must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious, that does not mean that I consider them conclusive.
I do, however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly what, from the constitutional point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised. He is clear that if we do sign the agreement with the EEC we will suffer some loss of Sovereignty.
This is clearly an act of Treason because our Constitution allows no such surrender of any part of our Constitution to a foreign power beyond the control of the Queen in parliament.
This is evidenced by the convention which says:-

(Parliament may do many things but what it may not do is surrender any of its rights to govern unless we have been defeated in war).
And the ruling given to King Edward 3rd in 1366 in which he was told that King John’s action in surrendering England to the Pope and ruling England as a Vassal King to Rome was illegal because England did not belong to John, he held it only in trust for those who followed him.
The money that the Pope was demanding as tribute was not to be paid because England’s Kings were NOT vassal Kings to the Pope nor was the money legitimately owed.
Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would, in my opinion, affect our sovereignty in three ways:-
a) Parliament would be required to surrender some of its functions to the organs of the community;
b) The Crown would be called upon to transfer part of its treaty-making power to those organs of the Community; The English Constitution confers treaty making powers on only the Sovereign. The Sovereign cannot transfer those powers to a foreign power nor even, to our own parliament because they are mere servants of the Monarch. Sovereignty itself cannot be given away as it resides with the people who entrust it to the Monarch for his/her lifetime and the Monarch is obliged by law to pass that sovereignty on to any successor as it was received.
c) Our courts of law would sacrifice some degree of independence by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the European Court of Justice.
It is a Praemunire to allow any case to be taken to a foreign court not under the control of the Sovereign. The European Court of Justice or the European Court of Human Rights are foreign courts not under the control of our Sovereign. Praemunire is a crime akin to Treason. The position of Parliament:
It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal Advisers that the Council could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and which would in fact become for us part of the law of the land.
There are two ways in which this requirement of the Treaty could in practice be implemented:-
It is a Praemunire to allow any laws or regulations not made by the Sovereign in parliament to take effect as law in England. This is illegal under the 1351 Treason Act, the 1351 Act of Praemunire (which was introduced by King Edward III because he believed it was an affront to his honour and dignity as King of England to have laws imposed upon his Kingdom by a foreign power, to have any of his subjects to be taken out of England to be tried in a foreign court or for his Bishops to excomminicate any of his subjects on the orders of the Pope), the Act of Praemunire 1392, the Act of Supremacy 1559, the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9 and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council made regulations requiring action by us.
The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither itself nor its successors, we could only comply with our obligations under the Treaty if parliament abandoned its right of passing independent judgement on the legislative proposals put before it.
A parallel [to the position of Britain and the EU] would be, for instance, the constitutional convention whereby Parliament passed British North American Bills without question at the request of the Parliament of Canada.
In this respect Parliament here would have in substance, if not in form, abdicated its sovereign position and it would have pro tanto, to do the same for the Community.
No such power exists for parliament to do this.
This would be an act of treason under the 1351 Treason Act, a Praemunire under the 1351and 1392 Acts of Praemunire, an act of treason under the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the 1688/9 Declaration and Bill of Rights and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
It would in theory, be possible for Parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.
For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of powers even in wartime that we have ever experienced and I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons.
Whichever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts, but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the Community would be irrevocable.
We should therefore have to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the statute of Westminster.
In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the Council, or other appropriate organ of the Community, its substantive powers of legislating over the whole of a very important field.
There is no constitutionally acceptable method of doing this because it would be tantamount to a total abrogation of their duty to govern us according to our laws and customs.
And it would be an act of treason under the 1351 Treason Act, a Praemunire under the 1351 and 1392 Acts of Praemunire and treason under the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the 1688/9 Declaration and Bill of Rights and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Regarding Treaty-making powers:
The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly true. Some treaties such as GATT and OEEC restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereignty that, by signing the Treaty of Rome, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.
But to transfer to the Council or the Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.
There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of the sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.
To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully federal state.
I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.
Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved: as you know, treaty-making power is vested in the Crown.
Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation, to take two examples, and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents.
But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.
This is a surrender of our Sovereignty, a clear act of treason under the 1351 Treason Act and a Praemunire under the 1351 and 1392 Acts of Praemunire, it is treason under the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the 1688/9 Declaration and Bill of Rights and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Independence of the Courts
There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another court and as I assume to be the implication of ‘refer’ -- to accept that court’s decision.
You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the independence and authority of our courts.
Of those three objections, the first two are by far the more important.
I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliament or the public to accept them.
I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.
But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this state, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.
Having said this, I would emphasise once again that, although those constitutional considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.
In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make some sacrifices of sovereignty: my concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are being called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.
It is a Praemunire to subject Her Majesty’s Courts of Law to the domination of a foreign court outside of Her Majesty’s control.
Joan Martin

APRIL 5 2016 Visiter No.629210 to www.opg.me

APRIL 5 2016 Visiter No.629200 to www.opg.me


APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629180 to www.opg.me

APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629170 to www.opg.me

APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629164 to www.opg.me
12 March 12:29
Hi, i feel just like you do, by reading your profile, ---- im a very normal intelligent nice caring women, whos been that much set up and delibratly discriminated, over my dads care that i can no longer face living in England, ive had to be come a recluse down in ????, -- all by my self, because my local council would not leave me a lone for going to the papers---- they interviewed me and asked me to pay back dated bills from years ago, -- they even had a go at me for visiting USA? Had a go at me for changeing my name, that was done to stop the court of protection, -- when i had gone public, --- the stress i went through, i feel i deserve composation, ------ done it in my own way, --- now im off to ???? soon, like youve done, ------a cheap apartment will have to do from the banks in ????, --- just so i can move all my stuff out of UK, ---i will rent my apartment out in Uk. My plan is to comute across to ???, ????, ????, from ????, flights seem cheaper from there than UK, --- i would prefer to move all my belongings straight to ????, ----- but i think it could cost to much, will check this out first. Just hope its not to late to infest there.
Did you go to jail like me for going public?
The council told 3 big dirty lies to sentence me to jail, ---- if you google my name, Daily mail, --- its all one big cover up, they put loads of lies in, -----repeated from the council, i was not jailed for kidnapping dad at all, my brothers got him out for me, and we hide out from the police, i didnt even have time to get dad his own spending money from his bank, where i use to take my brother to check i was only takeing small amounts out for dads food, -- with me being a very succsessful retired business women, -- i was the only person who should have been allowed to be over my dads welfare, and finances, no way it should have been the council, even my x boyfriend a x city councilor had reported the city works department for financial fraud on the radio years before when he was a union rep, gun men where sent to his home. So i already had learned how curupt Stoke on trent council where.
İ was jailed for contempt, --- when i had learned that i had been sentenced for a pack of lies i realised i couldnt trust the Judge, i was to afraid to even attend any more court hearings, all the hard work i had put in writing to the Judge during the court of protection, --- its has if he hadnt read any thing i wrote, i had sent him email addresses, contacts, good references from extra professional carers to surport a CARE PACKAGE asked for by the judge but never allowed to be done, --- WE WHERE NEVER ALLOWED TO HAVE DAD ASSESSED İN HİS CARE HOME, TO ALLOW FOR A CARE PACKAGE, CARE MANAGER SAİD, Sorry because theres a court of protection on we cant allow this, ----???-- TOTAL SET UP.
3 Lies to sentence me where, ---1, i had electronicaly sent a leaflet i had produced about the court hearing to a local collage, not true, ----only truth was i had produced a leaflet, still got them, about how dad was locked up in the councils care home, with photos of me and him on holiday in Turkey, but it was not about court case. 2nd lie, said i had called the social worker a bitch in court, un true. 3nd lie, -- Said i had left abusive phone messages to council, --- i have kept all the paper work, --- the main message was very intelligent, ---- i had explained a bout how dads health condition would be affected by been locked in care, that by giving him to much coffee which they where doing, since our family have a allergy to coffee, it was causing my dads water infections, hence, they kept giving him antibiotics to try and cure this but me and dad where alergic to these too, ---- so at the end all the over medication killed him off, he died a lot sooner than he should have done, bumped off realy because they got sick of
--------fighting our family after the council had become deputys. ps. ---- Curuption facts----- council had froze all my dads bank money on our return from Turkey after we had kidnapped dad, which had caused dad to have a nervous break down not been able to spend his own money, he had been a very independent business man, own business, -- this helped his care break down, plus i cought a very bad flu virus coughing my head off, --- it was the damp council flat bedroom i was in what caused it, --- all this and brothers brain dead girl friend calling each morning caused our care break down, all because all my money was over Turkey, i ran out, and had to surrender my dad back in to respite, ---- if we had dads own money could have put him in day care centre supervised while i recoved from flu, ----- i will never forgive my self for trusting them curupt bastards who sectioned my dad all over again with them curupt DEPREATİON PAPERS, ----- with these DOLES FORMS, they dont look after peoples best interests which they are used for, --- instead they take away their best interests, ----- my dad was not lacking enough of his CAPACİTY TO MAKE HİS RİGHT DECİSİONS, ---- watch the video on my profile page, of my father locked up in the care home, me and brother are interviewing him on it to show he had enough Mental Capacity to be released back to his family. PS.------ iM A LİVİNG WİTNESS, ----- OLD PEOPLE DEFİNATLY ARE DRUGGED UP İN CARE HOMES TO MAKE THEM A LOT WORSE, ----- it happend to my dad in 5 care homes, i realized when i got him to Turkey after he had been in 3 care homes , ----- he no longer was behaving drugged up, me and dad where both shocked how well he improved, i had got my dad back, --- he improved 100% the 2 months he was in Turkey, he went for long walks a long sea front, he eat 3 big meals a day, -- only problem was his severe OCD, EATİNG DİSORDER, --- i realised there would only be me who could manage it, with a few breathing spaces, i had part time carers already in place i could pay for out my own money, even the American pastors wife a x nurse needed the money, she offerd to help out, -----but the free mason Judge would never allow it, dad was so happy in Turkey, ------ and the best place for Dementia people is definatly a place in the sun by the sea, --- not locked up like a animal.
You know what, you could even speak to my brother İvan on here, he agrees with me at first my dad didnt even look like he had dementia when they started the court of protection, my dad was eccentric like i am, -- it made him look mad, he wasnt that bad at all, his OCD, eating disorder was the worst thing, but with me having a tiny bit of it, i understood it, i could work with it, -- i was much better carer than the ones he had in the homes, --- they discriminated me so they could win the court case, i was set up on my supervised visits to my dad, even lied about what i said when i dropped his cross off, they even brought the police in to one of my meetings with dad in the care home, and lied said i had discussed the court case with my dad, al i did that day was i simply asked dad if he would like me to be his represensitive, --which he was entitled to with being under a doles--- depreation of capacity, -----dad was fully switched on with me, -- remember he replied, --- of couse you are my daughter. When the police bursed in the room, he cryed his eyes out, -- because he knew full well we where both been set up in order to win their court of protection, he also said to the police, -- if you do any thing with my daughter , shes done nothing wrong, -- if i get out of here i will personaly come down and burn your police station down.---- When i phoned him 4 days later, he burst out crying soon as they passed him the phone, --- this type of thing continued, --- the carers where like witches, --- they must have been payed bonuses to lie and say to the court of protection that i was being a trouble maker and it was me makeing my dad cry, he must have had fights with the staff, because they used to phone my brother to say my dad was getting agressive so they had to sedate him, --- i later read in my dads medical records he had had a heart attack in that care home, no wonder, he wanted to come home to me, he had even told this to the court of protection solicitor who was brought in to represent my dad, --- this in its self is conflict of interest, because the solicitor---- Kate Jackson from Anthony and Collins was definatly in with our council, they al went in their little court rooms together with the court judge before our court hearings,Kate didnt even arrange to pay off my dads care home bill, i gave her the bills addressed to me, even had balifs knocking at my door, more court costs where added to his original care bill, the judge and Kate ignored al my letters written in discusing dads bills to be payed off on his house and his last care home, but they ignored every thing i asked them for, we didnt even sign a contract for dad to go in to that care home, some thing curupt has gone on because even today 5 years later, 3 years after dad died that care home bil has not been payed out my fathers estate, i wonder why, ---- some one is guilty here, is it the council for locking dad in their home?-- conflict of interest, im sure we got them on this one, as well as sentence me to jail for their petty lies saying i had gone public, and im sure the council where not alowed to freeze my dads money to force him in to care, --- this is also conflict of interest, how many more people are going through al these set ups, by law my father was entitled to a family life, by our inteligent loveing family which he had asked for, --- its even in his video we took at the care home as proof------ on you tube also, --- watch it, --- wanda maddocks father John locked in care home. Also wanda maddocks Daily mail, --- but they never published the truth.

APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629140 to www.opg.me
Your name is your property when you were born and registered where was the meeting of the minds and full disclosure? The government have stolen your property (the name) and committed a trespass “I am not a vessel im a man” the government of Canada recognises the supremacy of GOD” Given name; statement of birth Common Law is the custom of the people where does the police get jurisdiction over a man? The long form birth certificate is the statement of birth.
Only the jury of peers can judge a man crown court is admiralty law of the SEA (statutes) The CROWN is the BAR (British Accredited Regency) REGINA “THE OATH WAS TO PROTECT FELLOW MEN” POLICE ARE COMMITTING FRAUD
Whose court am I in? whos law is this before this court I do not understand legalise im an idiot websters 1828 Idiot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
Jump to Etymology - Etymology. Idiot is a word derived from the Greek ἰδιώτης, idiōtēs ("person lacking professional skill", "a private citizen", "individual"), ... Origin of idiot
Middle English, from Anglo-French ydiote, from Latin idiota ignorant person, from Greek idiōtēs one in a private station, layman, ignorant person, from idios one's own, private; akin to Latin suus one's own
You cant sue a judge, police constable, firefighter because they are all fictions BUT you can sue the man operating as the fiction. I am not a member of west Yorkshire police im not a member of their system/corporation ; so how does the corporation get jurisdiction over a man? It does not have jurisdiction!!! There is no contract between I a man and west Yorkshire police which is a fiction a corporation, it’s the same as HMRC we have to see that a CITIZEN is NOT man in law we need to see who we are!!
Charter of Rights and freedom and Customs s 32.1 states “the charter only applies to Government”

APRIL 3 2016 Visiter No.629120 to www.opg.me

APRIL 2 2016 Visiter No.629100 to www.opg.me

APRIL 2 2016 Visiter No.629070 to www.opg.me
link to follow..here

APRIL 1 2016 Visiter No.629025 to www.opg.me

MARCH 31 2016 Visiter No.629000 to www.opg.me

Statute law is only contract law and accepting the title Mr/Mrs makes you a trustee, the lowest standing in the court. frown emoticon You have zero rights as the trustee of the Crown Corporation.
You are actually contracting with them in the courtroom by being nice and letting them make you the public servant, when they are the ones who have the oath sworn as a man/woman under common law.
They are guilty of maladministration of their oath!
That's fraud, and because it's backed up by other actors being paid in the same non-court room, it's conspiracy to commit fraud! Flaws in jurisdiction are cured by the appearance of the body
All Rise! They are raising the dead!
i say don't honor the the invitation/summons. Send it back with 'addressee deceased' written on the font, and then nuke them with a NOTICE OF VOID ORDER, just to be sure! False and misleading conduct , impersonating a commonwealth officer , and obviously treason .. The court officers are actually there to protect you from the court , they need to be reminded of their duty
A title indicates an officer. They claim it's a courtesy title ie a benefit. Maxim on forcing a benefit: No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. http://ecclesia.org/truth/maxims.html#Benefits /maxims.html#Benefits Maxims of Law When Jesus spoke the Truth to his accusers, he would justify himself by quoting Law. First, he would quote God's Law, and after quoting God's Law He would often quote the accuser's law and use that against them as well. For example, Jesus would say, scriptures and then quote God's Law. Then he would… ecclesia.org
They are also guilty of the unlawful administration of an oath statutory declarations 1835 sec13 and that’s their rules
There is enough evidence lying around (just on my time line) to show that any court without a jury is an inferior court. That Magistrates Court's and County Court's are not constitutionally appointed. They are Star Chamber's abolished in the 15 hundreds. A judges/magistrates oath is common law, then they cause harm to men and women! It's called maladministration of their oath, ie TREASON AND FRAUD frown emoticon That any order from a judge or magistrate is incurably void on its face ab initio. Someone gives me an order i ask where to send the bill. Get your wallet out judge. i don't work for free, maybe we should have a chat about slavery. If he is not under oath there is no court, wink emoticon if he is under oath it's maladministration of his oath. All oaths are common law and these jokers claim they cannot see common law. Wrong jurisdiction totally.
MAXIM: No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent.
The bottom line is, FICTIONS were created by lawyers, so the elite can hid from their liability, while still pushing liability onto other people. I will carry on writing 'Title/Office Not Recognised Return To Sender' on all frudulent letters begging for fiat slave money in a bankrupt society where debt can only be set off into the future.
I will also write MAIL FRAUD on any threat letter with no signature on it, as lack of reverse liability shows criminal intent! No fiat currency system in the world has ever lasted longer than a generation, without it's value returning to zero.
Wars are fought every generation to cull the excess slave stocks, to hide the job of putting all the Monopoly pieces back into the box to start a new game of people farming
I handed in ecclesiastical deed poll and evidence of life 206 form and bought the body back to life Veronica Chapman, from the info page at FMOTL.
What I would do if I was ever Summons to a so-called Magistrates or County Court (aka "Star Chamber")
Update: Late September, 2012
I walk in to a Magistrate's or County so-called 'Court'.
I would stand, and note there is no space for a Jury.
I would say, to whoever is sitting there: "Do you intend to proceed?".
They MUST say: "Yes" ... (and probably "Please sit down as quickly as you can").
I would remain standing, and say: "I do not consent to these proceedings ... do you still intend to proceed?".
They will say something like: "Yes".
So then I would say: “Are you saying that you can proceed without my consent?”.
(Having gone that far) They must say something that means: "Yes".
When they've responded to the fact that 'They don't need my consent', I would say: "LEGALLY that's true of course, but LAWFULLY it is untrue ... very much untrue. Do you know the difference between LEGAL and LAWFUL?"
Now that has to invoke a response! Who knows what the response would be? Probably something along the lines of: "They are the same thing".
To which I would reply: "That's not true at all ... they are - in point of fact - direct opposites. If you don't know what LAWFUL means, then you shouldn't be sitting there".
So I would say: "For that reason you are under arrest for stating that you intend to proceed - in an Administrative capacity - without the consent of both Parties ... could someone please call the Police ... so that this person (these people) can be charged with Misconduct in Public Office and Treason by attempting to subvert the British Constitution".
I would wait ... and tell the Police I will accompany them to the Station, to swear out the COMMON LAW charges of "Misconduct in Public Office" and “Treason”. While I waited, I would explain what I was doing ... and what "Misconduct in Public Office" means. I would also explain, to all the other so-called Court staff (Star Chamber staff), that they can be charged as accessories/accomplices. I'd give all the other functionaries the opportunity to leave before the Police arrive, telling them that I will make them accomplices if they are still there when the Police arrive.
As, and when, the Police arrived, I would explain to them that their job is NOT to decide on whether or not the charges are valid, and/or whether of not the Judge/Magistrates are guilty/not guilty of anything. Their job is simply to process my complaint, and let the Judicial System provide a REAL Court (i.e. one with a Jury) to hear my charges. And for a Jury to reach the Verdict.
If necessary (if I got no co-operation) I would do it via a Private Prosecution ... also charging those who would not assist me. Other Possibilities.
PRIOR TO the "Do you intend to proceed?" question, it is possible to ask: "Is this a Constitutionally-convened Court of Law?" Now, what are they going to say to that? There are about 4 possibilities:
1. "Yes" (in which case they are FUCKED - see below!)
2. "No" (in which case they are FUCKED - because that's an immediate admission of criminal intent … if we continue with the original questions).
3. 'Silence' … in which case they are FUCKED … because we'll just repeat the question.
4. Or something like: "That's none of your business", or: "That doesn't matter", or: "We are not here to answer YOUR questions" … or some other utter bollox … in which case they are FUCKED … if we continue with the original questions.
The interesting one is: "Yes".
This can be followed up with: "Which Constitutional Convention defined these proceedings as Constitutional?"
Now they are FUCKED. They would have to quote "The Magistrate's Court Act" … or some such crap.
Because then next question is: "Was the Magistrates Court Act the outcome of a Constitutional Convention?"
Ho, Ho Ho! The reply would be: "The Magistrates Court Act was determined by Parliament"
So it's: "How does that render it Constitutional? Were the Members who voted favour all Constitutional Experts then? I find that hard to imagine. After all, some of them have difficulty in writing their own names, don't they? Parliament most decidedly DOES NOT comprise Constitutional Experts, which is the reason for the possibility of Jury Nullification. It isn't possible to change a Constitution without having a Constitutional Conference, jam-packed with Constitutional Experts - who VERY CAREFULLY weigh up the Pros & Cons of and amendment that is being considered. Have another go: Is this a Constitutionally-convened Court of LAW?"
Back to square one.
When they get arsey … as they will … it's back to: "Do you intend to proceed?", etc … as necessary. Here's what they are doing:
1. They send an 'invitation' - called 'a Summons' - to a dwelling. Only a man or woman is capable of interpreting the document (a cat can't ... a dog can't ... a chair can't ... and so on)
2. The man or woman makes the effort to go to the place defined (the Star Chamber), at the time/date defined.
3. Upon arrival, the Bench 'can't see', and 'can't hear', the man or woman ... the Bench can only 'see' and 'hear' a Legal Fiction ... such as when the man or woman consents to accept responsibility for the Legal Fiction (i.e. the "Name"). [They have admitted - multiple times - that they "Can only act against a Name". They cannot, for example, act against "Persons unknown"].
4. But 'a Name' is not the man or woman. By many means a Name can be detached from a man or woman, and a different Name attached e.g. Deed Poll, or simply 'by social agreement, during social intercourse ... whereby nicknames are attached, etc'.
It would be a very good idea if this were to be pointed out to them at every occasion, including the ABSURDITY of their position in this respect. I have the experience of standing next to a man, in a Star Chamber, and heard the Judge say he was going to issue a Warrant for the Arrest of the man I was standing next to. JUST HOW ABSURD WAS THAT???
When, after any exchange between the Bench and the man or woman, and said man or woman refuses to "make a plea", they will say that they will unilaterally enter a plea of "not guilty". At this point DEMAND that they prove "Power of Attorney" to do such a thing, pointing out that if they cannot PROVE Power of Attorney, then THEY are taking FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY for that plea. (At the time of writing, this causes multiple 'adjournments'. They simply don't know what to do. Quite how they will find a way around this I do not know - at the time of writing).
The legal person is a corporate entity! Worse than that it is a sub corporation of the crown, so you have no say at all We live in a Virtual Reality, it's not real.
If they want to make us play by Roman rules, that's my favorite.

MARCH 31 2016 Visiter No.628980 to www.opg.me

MARCH 31 2016 Visiter No.628966 to www.opg.me

MARCH 30 2016 Visiter No.628940 to www.opg.me

MARCH 30 2016 Visiter No.628938 to www.opg.me

Diana Smith This reads like an admission to what we already know. And that is the press in most part do the bidding of the Courts. There is a small office opposite the Supreme Courts in London , where the court journalists hang out. It is a known fact that while a case is in motion these journalists dare not even take a toilet break, less they miss any restrictions the Judge lays down. Perhaps your response to the letter should be you expect a defence for why the Mail feel they can use DIC TAT dictatorism to control the very members of the public that they then expect to purchase their paper? They seem to overlook that you are entitled to an opinion , where as in their own camp , opinions are those of the public. Which judging by the comments for the on -line version of the article, went against the reporter at about 9 to 1 throughout. They got it wrong, were proved to be wrong and still cling to they can do as they like. Well no they can't actually , as was proved with their comment about the "husband" of Stephen Fry.

MARCH 30 2016 Visiter No.628934 to www.opg.me

MARCH 29 2016 Visiter No.628877 to www.opg.me

MARCH 29 2016 Visiter No.628875 to www.opg.me
By order of Pope Francis: All Bar Association licenses are extinguished
Posted on April 8, 2015 by David Robinson
Anna addresses Cardinal George
All Bar Association licenses are extinguished.
•“There will be no seizure of the American retirement accounts, no false flags, no murder, no mayhem, no scalar weapons deployed.
•There will be no deceptive “offers” in commerce seeking to exchange gold for land or human capital under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit.
•There will be an end to this criminality and to the complacency of the Church and of the American Cardinals and Archbishops responsible for the mis-administration of the courts.
Or there will be Hell on earth, Cardinal George — literally, and it will not come against the innocent Americans. The Left Hand of God will come for those who are responsible and unrepentant.
The Treaty of Verona is extinguished. All Bar Association licenses are extinguished. By order of Pope Francis, all attorneys, all clerks, every member of the judicial system operating these frauds and oppressions became 100% individually and commercially liable as of September 1, 2013.
The banking cartels and governmental services corporations have been given three years to clean up their acts from top to bottom, to come into compliance with the Original Equity contract owed to the Americans, and to stop operating in criminal default.
I suggest that you get over your idea that it is the voter’s responsibility.
May God bless you to the same extent that you bless others.
Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia: Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow”

MARCH 28 2016 Visiter No.628840 to www.opg.me

MARCH 28 2016 Visiter No.628825 to www.opg.me
JUDGES BOND REQUIRED sent recorded delivery


MARCH 27 2016 Visiter No.628815 to www.opg.me

Is a disregard for something that should be considered. "this action displays an arrogant contempt for the wishes of the majority"
A commercial lien affidavit of truth notarised is the truth in law. So how can a court say I am in contempt when it is asking me to take down or remove the truth of a commercial lien affidavit that I then would be in contempt of that truth. This surely is a conflict of interest that only a jury can resolve.
Anna von Reitz
What is in a NAME?
Let's begin with the Bible, the source of the Law of the Land throughout the Western World, and let's begin with the most important name of all, the name of God.
God doesn't have a name. People have made up various excuses for this fact, but the scripture also quite clearly tells us the same. "I Am That I Am" is a four-letter description. There are 72 other three-letter descriptions known as "names of God" that each describe another defining characteristic of God, so that taken on the whole, we know far more about the nature and character of God than we could ever know from a name----but the fact remains that God does not have "a" name.
Neither do God's children. This is on purpose. In Revelation we are told that we will be given names, but as such, we have no names now --- at least no names known to mortal man.
What??? We have no names? That's right, we have no names. As children of God we are spirits inhabiting flesh, and like our Father, we have no names, only descriptions.
This is why for many hundreds of years in all the venues of Law of the Land, people are described: "Anne of Green Gables", "Henry of Warwick", "Elizabeth of Ardennes", "George by the Battlements", "Eleanora of Bailford, Bickford, and Main" ---- or, "Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia Riezinger of (von) Reitzenstein of (von) Lettow before (Vor) Beck."
So if we have no names, what are these things we use day to day to call each other to breakfast?
They are the Mark of the Beast. Why are they the Mark of the Beast? Because only Beasts (animals) have names. Adam was not given the right nor the assignment to name people. He was tasked to name animals and things only. So when a man gives another man a name, he is implying that the man receiving the name is (a) an animal or (b) a thing--- like a corporation.
Well, clearly, in some sense, a man is an animal, a mammal, and recognizable as such and as an animal he can be named. If he acts as a corporation--- a thing ---- he can also be named.
So it is that under the Law of the Sea, men have been given names as animals and treated as such; until very recent times the Admiralty sections of the Public Law (notably Title 7) have freely admitted that men are considered "land assets" and "animals".
Hence, a name applied to a man is literally "the mark of the Beast".
For many centuries the convention of describing people instead of naming them kept confusion at a minimum, but toward the middle of the nineteenth century the age-old practice based on Biblical Law began to be undermined. Why?
Administrative convenience.
It was easier to standardize conventions and religious concerns were waived. The name John Brown is after all just an abbreviation of the lawful name "John of the House Brown" and John Henry Brown is just an abbreviation of the lawful name "John who has taken the name Henry of the House Brown". Why have to write all that out and explain what it means? Doesn't everyone know that already?
Apparently not.
Instead, the lawful description of living people became confused with the Trade Names they were accostumed to using in business transactions. "John Henry Brown" the foreshortened and standardized description of the living man was, at least visually, the same as John Henry Brown, the Trade Name of that same man.
So the "descriptive name" and the "Trade Name" became distinguishable only by context or explicit definition, such as, "for the purposes of this document "John Henry Brown" means the living man making his home at Old Brown House in Devonshire...."
In 1933 FDR took advantage of this confusion between the foreshortened descriptive name and the Trade Name and muddied the water still more----on purpose.
His administration created millions of foreign situs trusts which just happened to be named after living Americans and which just happened to use all the same letters and Upper and Lower case style conventions as their abbreviated descriptive names and Trade Names already used.
Thus the description of a living man was written as "John Henry Brown" and his Trade Name (unincorporated doing business name) was written "John Henry Brown" and now, without his knowledge or consent, the United States of America, Incorporated---- a for-profit governmental services corporation that was about to go bankrupt-- created a franchise for itself and named it "John Henry Brown", too.
Of course, with a little mail fraud thrown in, when the living man "John Henry Brown" received a "statement" in the mail that was apparently addressed to him and which had all the outward appearances of a bill, he assumed it was his bill to pay. What other conclusion would be reasonable?
And in this way we, our parents, and our grandparents have been tricked into "assuming" and paying for debts owed by others--- first by the United States of America, Incorporated, throughout its long bankruptcy reorganization from 1933 to 1999 when all its debts were finally discharged, and now, again, we are being dunned for payment of debts owed by other corporate entities merely named after us---- "JOHN HENRY BROWN" is a Cestui Que Vie Trust formed under the Municipal (independent foreign city state) Law of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation operated out of Puerto Rico under Puerto Rican Commonwealth Law.
The Treasurer of the United States, Rosa Gumataotao Rios, is holding all your property including your name in a public trust named after you and the leeches benefiting from this are pretending that it is all "abandoned property" belonging to "no one" and that the UNITED STATES, INC. and its "STATE OF_______" franchises are the beneficiaries of your name and your property both public and private.
Doesn't that just warm the cockles of your heart?
You have been entrapped and defrauded and press-ganged into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, all your assets including your name have been "seized upon" while you have been declared "legally dead" and had your ESTATE administered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico......
In March of 2015 the UNITED STATES, INC. was declared insolvent by its creditors, with the result that its secondary creditors (we are obviously in line to be priority creditors of the whole shebang if we wake up) are now here claiming to own everything in sight.
Thus the land grabs in Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and elsewhere.
Thus the credit default swaps disguised as loans and "mortgages".
Thus the false arrests and claims against JOHN HENRY BROWN, which is by DEFINITION is a foreigner, a debtor, and an "Enemy" of the State.
Now you know well in advance why the charges against AMMON BUNDY and CLIVEN BUNDY and other American heroes will stick and why they will be found guilty and why nothing that they or their attorneys say about the Law or the Facts will matter: they are already guilty BY DEFINITION. All that is left to argue is--- does the COURT really have jurisdiction? And how much will they be charged in terms of money and years of life lost?
And you also know why the perverts responsible for these crimes of fraud and personage will be desperate to throw the book at them and make an example of them for standing up for their property and their rights. Their only hope of getting all of us to pay off their debts for them is by legal chicanery and preventing us from making our valid claims known.
If Ammon and Cliven Bundy realize what has been done to them and go to the district Court of the United States and sue to change their name back from AMMON BUNDY and CLIVEN BUNDY to Ammon Bundy and Cliven Bundy respectively and reclaim also their actual nationality as natives of Nevada, the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT will have to let go of their prey like an exploding hot potato and all those responsible for this gargantuan fraud will have to search for rocks to crawl under to hide their public shame.
And that, Dear Reader, is what is in a NAME.
If you read House Joint Resolution 192 very closely you will see that while it offers apparent remedy for all this identity theft and credit fraud, it also imposes a gag order on those responsible for administering it. It's all supposed to be hush-hush, private, confidential. Only those "in the know" who are "competent" to bring claims---- and who know the secret handshake and the secret steps to take--- can reclaim their rightful estate and property stolen from them and their parents and grandparents by mostly foreign banks using "governmental services corporations" as storefronts to operate under color of law and perpetuate all these oppressions and acts of fraud.
At the end of the day, what it amounts to is that these banks have pretended to be the lawful government, and via that illusion, have enjoyed our trust and obedience while they have stolen us blind.
And now they want to talk about "depopulation" --- a euphemism for kiling your creditors to avoid paying them and to profit from the estates they leave behind and to bilk the life insurance policies these vermin have placed on each one of us.
Law enforcement? Sheriffs? Pentagon? Members of Congress?Are you listening?
This is what is in a NAME.
Well, we Americans are awake. By the millions now. And so are the people in Brazil and Kuwait and Great Britain and Canada and Australia and Japan and Russia and China and India and all over this planet. We know and we are asking---- "Oh, so this is the "service" we've been paying you for all these years? To mischaracterize and enslave and defraud us?"
And we are thinking---- if you are worth your salt, you've got one job now. Clean up this mess and clean out these banks and arrest these bankers and clear out their nests on Wall Street and Fleet Street and Paris and Rome and Tokyo. Nobody who has heard this news is in the mood for learning any secret handshakes. We don't believe that 390 million Americans are duty bound to go to court and change their names back, when their names should never have been infringed upon in the first place.
We don't think we should have to pay for anything but the nineteen clearly enumerated services we agreed to pay for. And we think we have something to say about the quality of those services.
We want our good names restored to us and to our unique control, no questions asked. We want our property--both public and private--- restored to us, free and clear of all taxes, tithes, fees, encumbrances, liens, and indebtedness. We want all the credit and actual assets that have been extracted from us via "federal" racketeering, identity theft, and credit fraud returned to us, plus interest.
We want the banks responsible placed under new management and then liquidated to pay their priority and secondary creditors. In those cases where it can be proven that bankers and lawyers knew full-well what was going on, we want the corporate veil pierced and all their ill-gotten gains seized and sold for the benefit of the victims of foreclosure fraud and other atrocities.
The bankers and lawyers and the politicians who issued the gag orders and who have kept the people from obtaining remedy are guilty of the most heinous and venal felonies imaginable, including the theft and exploitation of children, the destruction of families, and the enslavement of entire nations.
That is what is in a NAME.
And now, let's return to where we began, and reflect with Solomon that there is nothing new under the sun. We have been here before. Read Jeremiah 34: 8-22. King Zedekiah and his ministers and the rich men of Jerusalem decided to do the right thing (mostly because they were under seige by the Babylonians) and agreed to follow God's rule and release the Hebrew slaves, both men and women. But then, they changed their minds and re-enslaved them, which sealed their own fate and destruction.
Here are the names of the banks that make up the so-called "Federal Reserve"---
Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
These are Jewish banks and Jewish bankers, no getting around it. And they are principally responsible for this entire situation, though they have been helped (mightily) by the British Crown, the British Monarch, the various Bar Associations and their Members, and politicians both the corrupt and the clueless alike, to create this gigantic fraud and perpetuate this criminality.
Jacob Rothschild stands in the shoes of King Zedekiah. God requires the slaves to be set free. And if they aren't. you all know the rest of the story. Anu:hotep/anaroth

MARCH 26 2016 Visiter No.628790 to www.opg.me
IN WAITING... to be SUED by REAL PEOPLE.. me n mum

MARCH 26 2016 Visiter No.628762 to www.opg.me
Wanda Maddocks NOT FORGOTTEN
My father was murderd by my local council, they drugged him up in every care home to make him look a lot worse than he was, i only realised after my brothers had kidnapped him for me, and i managed to get him to Fethiye in Turkey to give my father a normal more healthier life that he didnt seem drugged up any more, his brain and health improved by almost 100%, he was so happy and singing in his bedroom, in our apartment in Turkey, i took him line danceing, and to a lovely christian church where he realy surprised me and became a christian, they gave him a wooden cross which he would not leave my appartment with out putting it in his pocket, my dad had always been a athiest. He eat a lot more food, the warm sunshine and sea air made him want to do a lot of walking, he met a new women friend. SOON AS WE LANDED BACK İN ENGLAND, 2 MONTHS LATER, we learned in horror the council had frozen all dads bank money so he had no money for his food, they had started a court of protection court case, a secret court hearing where our family where not allowed to go public or all our money would be taken from us, and we could go to jail, --------this was total curuption, against the human rights law, my dad was entitled to a family life, ---- the council totaly set me up on my visits to my dad, they told so many lies about me, so they could make me look stupid and incapable of looking after my own father, they grabbed my dad back and locked him up in their care homes again, i suddenly was sent a court letter saying they where sending me to jail for electronicaly sending a leaflet to a local collage which i never did, so i ended up in jail not guilty, for 7 weeks not 6 weeks like the DAİLY MAİL printed, and it was not for kidnapping my father, i was sentenced for this big lie they told, and i never said that about the cross i dropped off to my dad at his care home, ---- read more, ----- google,------ wanda maddocks Daily mail, so many discriminating lies told by my local council. No one can trust councils, they should be governed in a more honest way, our goverment is allowing people to be murderd, and babys are been taken off the mothers in the same way, im a intelligent careing women, ----- this should never had happend, dad was entitled to a family life by law, court of European rights , -------- rights broken, i never got justice, i dont wish to live in England any more, its put me off the system, its way to curupt, solicitors are bent, judges bent, who can we trust.
video here
On the 30th March 2016 Wanda wrote..

MARCH 25 2016 Visiter 628750 to www.opg.me

Today is the 1st outing for mum from the 7 week stay in hospital.. she said "I hope your getting me out of here soon.." I laughed and said ok we will take you out today for a few hours then Monday next we ve been invited to a friends villa Heinrich Weber for lunch.

MARCH 25 2016 Visiter No.628745 to www.opg.me

MARCH 25 2016 Visiter No.628723 to www.opg.me

Commercial organisations carrying on business in the United Kingdom need to be aware of a new piece of compliance legislation – the Modern Slavery Act 2015. The date 31 March 2016 is key in this new legislation as organisations are now required to produce a ‘slavery and human trafficking statement’ at the end of every financial year falling after that day.
What is required?
The objective of the Act is to ensure transparency and accountability around the business activities of large organisations, not just to investors but also to other groups including employees, consumers and the public at large. It aims to create a level playing field between those organisations adopting ethical business practices and those that are not, driving investment towards more sustainable, responsible organisations.
Section 54 of the Act requires a commercial organisation in any sector, which supplies goods or services and carries on a business or part of a business in the UK, with a global turnover of £36 million or more to prepare a ‘slavery and human trafficking statement’ each financial year. This statement must set out the steps taken by the organisation in that year to ensure that slavery or human trafficking has not taken place in its supply chains or in any part of its own business.
This does not mean that the organisation must guarantee that the entire supply chain is slavery free. Instead, it means an organisation must set out the steps it has taken to ensure slavery and human trafficking is not taking place in relation to any part of the supply chain. However, if an organisation has taken no steps it must still publish a statement stating that to be the case.
The statement must be signed by a director and approved by the Board before being published on the organisation’s website, with a prominent link to it included on the homepage. Organisations without a website must provide copies of the statement to anyone requesting one.
When is this needed?
The requirement to provide this statement applies to organisations with a financial year ending on or after 31 March 2016. Those organisations will have to provide a statement at the end of that financial year and at the end of every financial year thereafter. So, for an organisation with a financial year end of 31 March 2016, the statement must set out the steps taken between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016. For an organisation with a financial year end of 31 May, the statement must set out the steps taken between 1 June 2015 and 31 May 2016, and so on. The statement is backwards looking. There is no requirement to project forward to set out steps that will be taken in future financial years to ensure the absence of slavery in the supply chain (although this information could be included voluntarily if appropriate).
Organisations with a financial year ending between 29 October 2015 (when the Act came into force) and 30 March 2016 will not need to produce a statement for that financial year but will need to produce a statement for each subsequent financial year. It is recommended that organisations produce their statement as soon as possible and in any event within six months of the end of the financial year to which it relates in order to ensure that the information in it remains current.
What if we don’t do it?
The Secretary of State is empowered to seek an injunction against a non-compliant organisation ordering it to produce a statement. Failure to comply with an injunction is contempt of court for which the sanction is an unlimited fine. In addition, as the public becomes increasing aware of the existence of these statements, failure to produce a statement in any year is likely to adversely impact on an organisation’s reputation, with possible adverse inferences being drawn.
How do we know what to do?
The Home Office has produced guidance for organisations on their obligations under s54 of the Act. The guidance defines some key terms (such as what modern slavery is), explains how to calculate global turnover (so an organisation can assess if it falls within the scope of the Act) and gives tips (with examples) on drafting an acceptable statement.
What should we do now?
As the end of its financial year approaches, an organisation must prepare to produce the statement required by the Act. Organisations that have taken relevant steps to ensure that slavery or human trafficking has not taken place in its supply chains or in any part of its own business need to collate the information about exactly what has been done, in preparation for drafting the statement. This, of itself, could be a significant task the first time round.
Organisations that have not taken such steps may be concerned that they have nothing to report. If they want to rectify that, they have until the end of their financial year to put some appropriate steps in place.

MARCH 23 2016 Visiter No.628675 to www.opg.me

MARCH 23 2016 Visiter No.628665 to www.opg.me

Make your own mind up about the future of Britain based on this website.

MARCH 22 2016 Visiter No.628640 to www.opg.me

MARCH 22 2016 Visiter No.628635 to www.opg.me

MARCH 22 2016 Visiter No.628633 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628605 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628602 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628600 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628590 to www.opg.me

A Report to the World-Anna von Reitz
The UN Corporation doing business as the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES doing business as the STATE OF ALASKA, The Federal Reserve doing business as the Federal Reserve System doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, doing business as the State of Alaska, the FEDERAL RESERVE doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (INC.) doing business as ALASKA..... the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, the WASHINGTON DC MUNICIPALITY, the U.S.A. (Inc.), the U.S. Corp, The United States of America (Inc.), E Pluribus Unum the United States of America (Inc.)......
Do you realize that roughly 80% of what Americans have paid to support the poor and disabled in this country---- public assistance, aid for orphans, the unemployed, the mentally ill, people with chronic diseases, the elderly, paralyzed veterans---- has been siphoned off by these above-named corporate vermin, their parent corporations, subsidiaries, agencies and affiliates?
We paid for all these programs with the intention of taking care of everyone, and instead, these criminals have been like rats in a grain storage silo, putting out just enough to give a storefront appearance that these programs were real and helping people, while secretively embezzling from the poorest and most vulnerable Americans.
Just as bad, 98% of what Americans have paid to support the poor in other countries around the world-----vast amounts of foreign aid----have been siphoned off and squandered by these criminals. We have given and given and given with the intention of helping people in the Third World and paid for programs to build bridges and drill water wells and provide homes and livestock and electrical generators and transportation and roads and fishing boats and clothing and medicine and entire hospitals and schools and supplies of every kind, plus food of all kinds------and where has it gone? Mostly stolen by the thieves in Washington, DC, but then also stolen by their counterparts in other countries. They have fed upon the innocent and helpless both going and coming---- stealing the benefit of our giving from the people we intended it for, and thereby stealing from us as well. They have had a "two for one" theft scheme going, in which the Americans are thought to be hard-hearted and greedy and selfish, and the people in the Third World are thought to be ungrateful, lazy, and incompetent, with neither party realizing that criminally dishonest middlemen have been the problem all along.
Embezzlers. Thieves. Con artists. Imposters. And these duplicitous vermin have been the "face of America" to the rest of the world. They have sent their commercial mercenary armies into other countries around the world and raped and pillaged and stolen and polluted and pedaled their wares of guns and armaments and drugs and alcohol and every kind of immorality and they have done this in the names of America and Americans while we have been kept isolated and "dumbed down on the farm back home"----- believing in "our government" and Mom and apple pie.
It is indeed disgusting to contemplate what these criminals have gotten away with and what the rest of the world must think of us as a result.
The best that can be said for it is that we know now. We are waking up. For many people this process is very hard and unpleasant, like being awakened from a sound sleep with a bucket of cold water. For a while--- weeks or months depending upon how deeply indoctrinated people are, how loathe they are to admit the truth---- they rampage around striking out at friend and foe alike, disoriented and unable to know the difference, still half-asleep and grumpy like hibernating bears in the spring time.
And then something happens. Some little thing goes "click" in their brains and they realize The Truth. All at once. It is not uncommon for grown men to break down and weep when this happens. Boom. The American Dream has been unlawfully converted by these scum bags into the American Lie.
Once they wake up, people know for sure that they are unhappy and have been unhappy for a long time. They know that they are not free and that they live in fear of unaccountable "agencies" like the FBI and IRS and FEMA and DHS ----foreign commercial mercenaries and bill collectors operating under old trade names and brand names, pretending to be part of a lawful government that is long gone. The newly awakened gradually own up to the fact that they are constantly being harassed and exploited and manipulated and disrespected and extorted and intimidated and misrepresented by people who are supposed to be providing them with "essential governmental services". They realize they are being robbed---and worse, blamed for all this evil by the rest of the world.
When I first realized all this it felt like I had a big block of ice in my stomach. There was no fire, no outburst, no tears, no fear, no great emotion---- just icy cold stillness and hardness. I felt my jaw solidify into a rock. I realized in that moment that it truly didn't matter if I lived or died, how much it cost, how long it took----and this is what I mean when I twist the words of King George V and tell people--- "Keep calm and get even." Don't flinch. Don't let your emotions run wild. Feel no fear. Don't worry. The Devil has been living in your house for a long time. The only difference is that now you know he is there.
We are dealing with the British Raj here. The same vermin that Gandhi had to face in India. The same ones who mowed down the wives and daughters at Amritsar. The same ones who kept people from taking salt from the sea, which they needed to live and which had always been their right to harvest generation unto generation. The same ones who enslaved the Indian people by the hundred millions to feed Westminster, the British Crown Corporation, and the Queen --- have been sitting here polishing their boots in America --- feeding off of us and using our sons and daughters as fodder in their wars for profit, stealing and manipulating our natural resources. pawning off their phony paper promises "in equitable exchange" for our silver and gold, bullying us, and misrepresenting us to the rest of the world so that at the end of the day after all this abuse at their hands, we would be blamed by the rest of the world for all the evil these criminals have committed in our names.
And when I say, "in our names"----I mean it literally. Several years ago I obtained a copy of "my" Master File kept by the IRS and learned that---- supposedly--- I was running a rum distillery in Barbados. That is a pretty good trick for a grandma who has never visited the Caribbean. I was pretty high up in the management, too----hauling down the equivalent of $180,000.00 a year in salary that I somehow never received. Imagine all the other Americans who are going about their lives on dairy farms and working in small businesses and clerking at grocery stores who are being grossly, purposefully, with malice-aforethought lied about like this?
Just recently I was given more "official government records"---- this time records related to my dead father's estate. He has been dead since 1981, but somehow, "he" is still paying no less than nine (9) mortgages out of estate trust accounts established "in his name" -----and all for people I never heard of and who are not part of our family.
How is this possible? When we are mere babies in our cradles undeclared agents of these foreign corporations ---- the IMF and the British Crown Corporation --- come to new Mothers in the guise of hospital workers and force them to sign paperwork seeming to admit that they are all unwed mothers, all "donating" their babies to the "State" corporation as "wards of the State". I was told that if I didn't sign this paperwork, my son would not be released to my care. He would be placed in "State sponsored Foster Care" and I would never see him again.
I was a completely responsible 40 year old adult with a good income, a husband, a home, everything---- and they pretended that I was an irresponsible, indigent, unwed mother seeking to offload my unwanted baby and willingly giving him to the tender mercies of the "STATE OF ALASKA"---- the local franchise of the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES (INC.).
They did what they always do. They seized upon his name, copyrighted it as property of the British Commercial Corporation, and began spinning off all sorts of corporate "personas" named after my son.
First, there was a "state level" foreign situs trust doing business as Eric Jon Belcher. And then there was a Roman Inferior (Cestui Que Vie) Trust operated out of Puerto Rico doing business as ERIC JON BELCHER. And then, most recently, Mr. Obama decided to create a public transmitting utility called Eric J. Belcher--- also in Puerto Rico----all owned and operated by the British Crown Corporation and its various subsidiaries, franchises, and affiliates and created for their benefit.
They have issued performance bonds in my son's name under the pretense that he is or ever was their ward and have obligated him to pay off their mortgages, accept their debts, pay their taxes, buy their services, accept conscription into their commercial mercenary forces, obey every whim of their "Congress", back their promissory notes with his private property and labor, and so on and on in an endless recitation of enslavement and false claims and breach of trust.
I want the world to know that all and any paperwork I signed at Providence Medical Center in November of 1996 I signed under the most detestable and inexcusable duress imaginable, under threat of forcible kidnapping of my infant son. Any contract express or implied arising from such practices and seeming to obligate me or my son is nothing but fraud on the face of it and always has been. The British Crown Corporation, the UN Corporation, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, their parent corporations, subsidiaries, agencies, and affiliates are guilty of malicious tort fraud of the worst kind.
These corporations are under demand to release our copyrighted names, trademarks, and private estates to our control free and clear, without tax, lien, debt, attachment, encumbrance, obligation, deed, claim, or colorable title of any kind. And then we will talk about what else they owe us.
Every corporation involved in this enslavement and kidnapping racket, all those preying upon babies and new mothers, deserve to be liquidated and have their assets distributed to their Priority Creditors-----the American People. Those responsible for promoting and continuing to implement this institutionalized fraud and enslavement scheme need to be arrested as criminals and prosecuted to the fullest extent of both national and international law. People everywhere need to be aware of what has gone on here, who is responsible, and what we are all facing. It's not "the Americans"----its a nest of vicious and cowardly criminals who have insinuated themselves and pretended to represent us, while bilking us and everyone else for their own profit.

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628575 to www.opg.me
full story here

MARCH 20 2016 Visiter No.628568 to www.opg.me

Aj Hollis Statute laws are legal fictions, assumed consent is a fraud. MPs for the most, live with eye wide shut simply to hitch a ride on the gravy chain.
Attaching peoples real live to that of parasitic whore lawyers is a fraud in it's self. The Court of Protection Racket, is the actualization of taxation of life it's self. It is piracy of the sea enacted on land by the filth that infests the city of London and a mafia that is the legal profession. The judiciary come from the legal profession so are therefore blighted by partiality, they serve a self serving, self perpetuating system that by it's nature is a tresspass against the person, and a crime against humanity.
This system is designed to incrementally use legal fiction to empower the money lenders and while weakening the defence of sovereign beings against the corporatism (the cult of death). When the sovereign being reacts, they are isolated by the false judges and they and their true rights are fruadulently denied

MARCH 20 2016 Visiter No.628565 to www.opg.me
There have been a number of developments in this case recently. North Yorkshire Police are said to have spent around £1million of public funds obtaining a "gagging order" as a result of a civil claim pursued on behalf of private individuals. This is for alleged harassment and flies in the face of a Crown Prosecution Service determination that there is insufficient evidence of harassment to warrant a prosecution.
Legal opinion we have questions the legality of this claim and the validity of the order, which restricts what can be said about this case. For instance, Grandma B's name must not be mentioned in the public domain. Neither can the names of the people Lord Maginnis has stated in Parliament as her abusers and persecutors be mentioned in the public domain. However, there are no restrictions on naming her loyal son and carer Peter Hofschroer.
Peter has now started his second year of imprisonment on remand and is currently at HMP Holme House. The trial date is now 4th July 2016, but may not go ahead then. It has already been put back several times. This is a clear breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which requires cases to be heard in a reasonable time.
The sinister and secretive Court of Protection is now determining Grandma B's future. She is being held incommunicado in an undisclosed location. Since being in the "care" of her persecutors at York Social Services, she has received a series of life-threatening injuries. We fear for her life.
Meanwhile, Grandma B's abusers have fraudulently sold her house, seized Peter's, stolen his belongings and sold his house as well. Presumably, the police officers, social workers and judges involved are likely to have got their pay-offs by now.
Grandma B and her loyal son are now homeless, penniless and unlawfully imprisoned.
All Grandma B ever wanted was to spend her remaining years living in her own home in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son.
Sadly, this will now never be possible.

MARCH 19 2016 Visiter No.628542 to www.opg.me

MARCH 19 2016 Visiter No.628525 to www.opg.me

MARCH 18 2016 Visiter No.628500 to www.opg.me

Michael Clarke’s side of the story as told to John Smith. here in PDF
NO matter whether you are a national daily newspaper or in our case a weekly, six-edition English language paper, the freedom of press comes with obligations which need to be recognised.
Here at the Euro Weekly News, we published an article two weeks ago about an Englishman and his mother, Michael and Ann Clarke, where we gave some details of what we understood to be their story and asked readers to keep an eye open for them.
Within a few days of the publication of the article, we were contacted by Michael himself, who asked that he be given the opportunity to present his side of the case as he believed that he was being placed in an unfavourable light, and in his opinion he had been wronged by both his family and the process of English law.
This is where our responsibility to present the other side of the story comes in, and I met both Michael and his mother Ann (who unfortunately is currently in hospital in Spain), to hear exactly what he had to say and after spending several hours in his company, I do agree that his position should be made clear.
According to Michael, when the accident occurred in 1995, Ann spent a year in hospital and when she came out, she moved to a care home which she didn’t like so it was agreed between the family that she would stay in her own house. It was also agreed that she would pass it to her daughter who would take over the mortgage and in return would make a payment to her mother (which she allegedly failed to make) and look after her, and that Michael would move in as well.
In a relatively short period of time, Michael decided to move out as he had been offered the tenancy of a pub, but within about 10 weeks his sister advised she couldn’t cope with Ann and she would have to go into a home. Neither Ann nor Michael wanted this and although the pub wasn’t really suitable for her needs, she moved in with him and he looked after her on an unpaid basis from 1996 until 2001.
During that time he left the pub and ran a student lodging house and rented a bungalow for himself and his mother. His sister moved in after a marital dispute and agreed that if he moved to Tenerife, she would look after Ann.
After a few weeks, Ann travelled to Tenerife on holiday and asked that she be allowed to stay with Michael to which he agreed and they stayed on the Island for two years. This was all prior to any settlement and without any cash, except for the mother’s disability allowance on which they lived.
1995 was the year when Ann Clarke’s accident occurred
There was a problem with a credit card which I cannot go into detail about, but for a period of time the benefits allowance was suspended whilst an investigation took place and this caused significant financial stress on the pair, although it was eventually resolved and back payments were given to them.
At the same time, in the lawsuit there was a change of solicitor and the new solicitor suggested that the matter be settled out of court to which they reluctantly agreed, and a payment of £775,000 was made to the mother, with Michael acting officially on her behalf.
At the time of the settlement, Ann and Michael employed two clinical specialists to establish whether she was able to make her own decisions to which they declared she was. Despite this however the whole matter was sent to the Court of Protection and a solicitor was appointed to look after her affairs and manage her funds.
In 2001 they moved to Blackpool. According to Michael, and I have not seen documentary evidence of this, (although I don’t doubt that this is his absolute belief), the solicitor was supposed to charge around £2,000 annually to manage this matter, but in the first year released just £10,400 to Ann, whilst charging £26,377 for his services, with a further £14,000 charged the second year.
This carried on for two years before Michael found this out, and after they a made a formal complaint their allowance was increased. Michael set up a club by 2003, which was successful. All was well until the recession in 2008, when the club suffered setbacks and they decided to immigrate to Spain.
At that time, in 2008, they had been trying to sell the property in Blackpool, without success as the recession had set in and Michael has been accused of acting improperly by his sister which he completely denied. Whilst living in Spain, Ann tried to exchange her UK property for a Spanish villa, which Michael has accused the deputy solicitor of prevaricating resulting in the loss of two properties.
In addition, because so much money has been held in sterling rather than a euro account which they had requested, there was a significant exchange rate loss. In short, they allege that the Court of Protection had overcharged Ann an estimated £150,000, and facilitated an exchange rate loss by not providing a euro account of £100,000, meaning Ann was out of pocket by a total of £250,000.
From 2009 to 2013 Michael had written to all known complaint bodies to try and draw attention to this, but all to no avail. The advice received was to serve on the solicitors a Commercial Lien that basically is a statement of truth sworn on oath before a notary.
He insists he would return to the UK to have the whole matter aired in front of a court provided there is a jury which will make the decision with regards to his guilt, and he advised me he has been given an undertaking by the court, (which has no right of extradition from Spain) that if he returns to the UK to apologise, and if his mother returns and surrenders her passport then ‘all will be forgiven’.
That begs the question of why Ann should give up her passport, what happens about the alleged losses, does Michael have a ‘record’ and will he be chased for court fees?
It is up to each and every one of our EWN readers to make their own conclusion on this situation, but as the writer of both stories I do believe that neither the local press nor the general public should play judge and jury in this matter.
What is crucial to remember is the whole point of the initial story was to try to ensure the protection and welfare of Ann Clarke, who I have now seen for myself and do believe without question she is more than happy to be here in Spain with her loving son Michael.
What do you, our readers think? Is this a case of a fugitive on the run or simply a loving, doting son doing the best he can for his mother?

MARCH 18 2016 Visiter No.628492 to www.opg.me
18th March 2016 published on www.opg.me mike@rake.net
A statement
by: Mike: Clarke
To clarify;
1. Your wilful refusal to address the losses inflicted upon Ann’s estate shows how the words ‘guardian’ & ‘protection’ play their roles not upon the vulnerable public, but upon yourselves.
2. Before we ever step one foot into that country ever again the issues of LOSS needs to be addressed with URGENCY for without it the guise of GUARDIAN & PROTECTION are laughable.
3. Once the issue of LOSS has been addressed, there can be no case to answer for harassment and nor was there ever a case for it, against a carer, whistle blower son and heir, who was, in the face of crime only doing what he lawfully must do, to report and account for such crime.
4. If the UNITED KINGDOMs crime reporting and policing policy’s upon white collar frauds do not step up and deliver, as is the case here, then common law must prevail and is available to use.
5. A statement of truth as a notarised affidavit, COMMERCIAL LIEN should not be apologised for in a purge, as it would be in contempt of THE TRUTH. I cannot be in contempt of both the truth & the court for it is the duty of the court to be seen to get at the truth, is it not?
6. Strangely, the court recently and I quote, “upon the courts own initiative” acted whichever way it has wanted, but has not once mentioned or referred to the losses inflicted upon ANN, but what it does demonstrate is, that it CAN! Yet the court states, ‘it’s not in Ann’s best interest to be away from her native country’, carefully ignoring they are the reason that drove her out.
7. The court is attempting to put the cart before the horse, obviously to facilitate its blackmailing process of a purge of contempt by the threat of prison for Mike: Clarke and a care home prison for Ann, by the removal of her passport, in orders to PROTECT the BAR CRIMINALS.
8. The court has already laid Ann’s estate to waste by the devaluing of her home £70,000 by the actions of police raiding her property 3 times at night destroying the lodging business that was topping up her pension in 3 years by £60,000 and if not sold NOW, further waste will follow.
9. The police will not act to investigate white collar fraud theft and mal administration but upon a biased unfair and partial to PANNONE LLP warrant of arrest ordered by a treasonous JUDGE will break down doors to get at the whistle blower of crime, a carer!
10. There by the view point of a barrister in 2015 January where he said there is a case to answer but yet no representation will be forthcoming, what can one do? Exchange Losses £100,000
11. CAPPED charges from day one never took place and should in ten years not have exceeded £25,000 but actually were £155,000 equalling an overcharge of £130,000… the 1st year alone of £26,377 was never fully accounted for in a detailed manner? NO ACCOUNTABILITY - THEFT
12. Just a brief insight to claimed losses amounts to £360,000 without any punitive allowances and other hardship calculations preventing Ann from property exchange or purchase abroad.
13. The facts are not just isolated to us, there are many others that have suffered losses at the hands of an organised crime syndicate of probate practitioner racketeering that is operating under the guise of the Office of the Public Guardian, PROTECTED by its Court of Protection.

MARCH 18 2016 Visiter No.628470 to www.opg.me

MARCH 17 2016 Visiter No.628440 to www.opg.me
Dear Mr Troup
My brother defendant has just forwarded to me your email below. In future please ensure you copy-in the other defendants.
As you may already know I am a researcher into serious and organized crime and the extent into which it has infiltrated the court of protection and national a network of professional panel probate practitioners. We need to print all emails for dissemination amongst the team so we ask you to use black instead of blue in future.
I read you were asking for the Official Solicitor's file. Did you receive it? I am sure you will want to fulfil professional conduct rules and fair trial rights. At present it appears the civil trial set for the 5th 6th & 7th will need to be adjourned until a fair trial is achieved with full and proper disclose.
I am sure you will understand the seriousness of these matters as the legal professionals involved are not of those entitled and given the strength of evidence these matters can be elevated from the civil to the criminal courts accompanied with all the possibility of prison sentences being handed down.
I am waiting for a response from the 2nd defendant if he would except an offer from your clients and as agents their client to settle. The settlement could be collected from all those legal professionals involved in the fraud of our actual real property.
Considering: The Defamation of the Testator and her Executor. The insolence and interference of mere solicitors. The deceit and wilful intimidation element of the claimants behaviour. Compensation for the loss of a large estate. The huge distress caused and an element of Exemplary damages I believe my brother may agree with me to settle in the sum of twelve 12 million pounds.
We look forward to hearing from you with your clients agreement.
Gary Hollis
Executor researcher

MARCH 17 2016 Visiter No.628424 to www.opg.me
Before her death while my mother was under the Court of Protection Racket, her receiver/deputy corrupt lawyer Anthony Spiers, Bath had a fraudulent Statutory Will forged that added two clauses STEP which added as a fourth beneficiary a Multi Millionaire who had through his corrupt Lawyer Jeremy Thring Bath made shares worth 90% less through a share rights issue while she was sick, and HOTCHPOT which added in all gifts given in her lifetime to be accounted for in the forged Will. The Fraud was taken court but all the corrupt court did was remove fraudulent clause and appoint two different corrupt lawyers and Anne Minihane as the corrupt deputy. The reason stated for this Will was another fraud, a "hypothetical Lucid Moment'. since Minihane and corrupt Law firm Burroughs Day, Bristol have robbed us of around 30 to 40% of the true value plus Inheritance Tax at 40%. Now they are suing us to force us to sign there accounts and indemnify them for their crimes. As we are paying for the legal costs, I can't afford a Barrister, so am a litigant in Person although in coercion sounds closer to the fact. In my submission and witness statement I made clear I was making a counter claim, at no stage did I get told I needed permission until I found out after a pre trial I could not attend.. this letter shows clearly shows the conduct of Judge McCahill and Barrister Alex Troup. I would be interested in any comments
Dear Judge McCahill
I have gone over all communications from the Court and there has been absolutely no indication that I was informed I needed to apply to the Court for permission to have my counter claim heard by the court. The only mention of seeking permission was in relation to my brother and his letter to the court, and naturally as he had not acknowledged the claim in the specified time, it reasonably appeared to me that this was why he needed to apply for permission. I read Troups skeleton argument on the 6th of march, My partners mother Joanna ***** had fallen seriously ill after a battle with cancer and was dying. Our lives were upside down trying to arrange her work obligations for my partner to travel to Wells to see her mother before she died, plus of course from this entirely uncalled for claim. Ana’s mother sadly passed away on the morning of the 9th of March just as Ana was boarding her plane at Malaga Airport
I also note that Troup falsely states I made unsubstantiated claims of Fraud, this is prejudicially untrue, I have a copy of the Statutory Will that includes 2 added clauses STEP and HOTCHPOT that prejudice the heirs for the benefit of a 4th person which is clearly fraud, as is a “hypothetical Lucid Moment” as the only excuse for this and the second false Will. This fraud however has nothing to do with my counter claim and nor do a great many of my true and substantiated claims, that are only include as general proof of misconduct.
Indeed my claim stands as well under Negligence as it does under Racketeering and misconduct.
Sir if you have read my evidence it is entirely clear I have a good case against the claimants, and it is entirely apparent Troup is desperate to silence me, indeed the whole indemnity claim is a clear and obvious attempt to pervert the course of Justice.
In all due respect your refusal to hear my counter claim as a litigant in person, demonstrates a clear prejudice, I will withdraw from the case and make an official complaint against both you and Troup. I feel sure any order you make in such circumstances will be made void. This will then require retrial that will add further costs once again adding yet more profit from the on going racketeering, and regrettably those will need to be sort from a claim against you for misconduct.
To avoid such unpleasantness I respectfully request you postpone the hearing and disqualify yourself as Judge as it strongly appears you are not acting under your oath and instead acting for the claimant.
Further I am fully aware that many of the people involved in this false Will are Freemasons. As it is common knowledge that any oath to her Majesty, is secondary to the oaths of this satanic cult, and indeed I believe under threat of death. I therefore seek to ensure that your replacement has no such affiliations.
With respect, kindest regards Adrian Hollis

MARCH 17 2016 Visiter No.628400 to www.opg.me
INVOICE for £15 million filed on JUDGE JACKSON for FRAUD

FAO JUDGE JACKSON the attached BILL/INVOICE for £15 million pounds
When you settle this attached BILL we then will have the money to pay for flights as we are skint right now.

MARCH 16 2016 Visitor No.628380 to www.opg.me

SENTENCE SUSPENDED but is it in mine and mums BEST INTERESTS??? subject to me apologising??? for what?? for trying to get back what they STOLE??
1. The state control of mums estate has prevented her from moving abroad to exchange her property. Meaning the empty property devalued by waste to £180,000 from £250,000 a total loss for mum of £70,000
2. The state control of her cash estate in emgration forcing her to live off pound sterling devaluing the estate by an exchange rate LOSS of £100,000
3. The state conrol under the 1st general order made by Judge Lush in 2001 by his own statement and the deputy Hugh Jones efectively capped charges to £2000 p.a. meaning over 10 years charges would be £20,000 but in fact were £150,000 making a breach of trust by £130,000 LOSS.
4. The proof of capacity by 4 doctors reports at or around £800 each & 2 state doctors that did nothing as fraud by false representation continued amounted to a LOSS of £5000
5. The states lack of safe guards ref accountability and investigation drove mum into exile costing her ability to walk, without her aids from home... LOSSES that would have kept her in the life she needed ie her lodging house with 4 tenants that left due to police activity .. £360 per week x 52 = £18,720 x 3 years = LOSS £56,000
6. The states lack of accountability leading to the carers exile and court costs to PANNONE LLP what ever they may be. MEANING that mums personal losses by the unaccountabilty of a court with unchecked unfettered powers upon the vulnerable is nothing short of on or around a half million pounds without punitive damages, MINIMUM.

MARCH 15 2016 Visiter No.628335 to www.opg.me

MARCH 15 2016 Visiter No.628322 to www.opg.me


MARCH 14 2016 Visiter No.628270 to www.opg.me
AWAITING contact from one television producer and also the BBC about our STORY.
The EURO WEEKLY NEWS are now going to press with the full and complete story for release next week. The media do now seem to be getting their teeth into the facts.

MARCH 13 2016 Visiter No.628224 to www.opg.me


FAO the FOREIGN OFFICE & our MP Gordon Marsden via DOMINIC of the British CONSULATE Malaga Spain
also copied to
Steve Doughty & Paul Macre of the DAILY MAIL
JUDGE JACKSON for whom the attached letter is ultimately directed via MORTON the clerk
cc'd to other victims Pilot Leonard Lawrence - Jean James - Gary Hollis
Published on www.opg.me
Dear BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE via Dominic of the British Consulate in SPAIN
You may or may not be aware of Judge Jacksons latest proposed draft order linked here within the attached letter to him.
In his proposal my mum must return to the UNITED KINGDOM and surrender her PASSPORT!!!
In it JACKSON offers to suspend a fraudulent courts prison sentence of her son for 3 months where Judge Pelling's BIASED sentence was VOID anyway.
He also offers that within 6 weeks I the son purge my so called contempt of JUDGE FOSKITs court order in which that TOO was VOID from due process denial.
WE are not only reeling from the shock of totally BIASED WORLDWIDE adverse press that got it completely wrong that now JUDGE JACKSON appears to be playing up to that press alleging mum's incapacity to be free to travel where and with whom she like s as per documented CLINICAL NEUROLOGICAL SPECIALISTS reports that state her capacity to such, what on earth is going on??
He continues in this draft with the BLACKMAIL proposals of purge my contempt when it is the court of protection that is in contempt of my mothers LOSSES under the UNITED KINGDOMS act of PARENS PATRAE, state control of her affairs that prevented her moving abroad to purchase property previously, forced her when emigrated to live off sterling losing her £100,000 and now persecuting her and me into exile in the 1st instance to prevent them putting the whistle blower son into prison to STOP SILENCE GAGG and PERVERT justice by using a purge of BLACKMAIL???
Jesus you just could not make this UP??
IT looks like our only option remaining is to RENOUNCE our BRITISH PASSPORTS??
by: THE EXECUTOR of ANN CLARKEs estate under the terms of the living will
mike & ann: clarke

MARCH 11 2016 Visiter No.628138 to www.opg.me
BUY a COPY of the 'NEW DAY' the latest NEW nataional paper if you want the real story

MARCH 11 2016 Visiter No.628124 to www.opg.me
NOT YET SENT linked here

MARCH 11 2016 Visiter No.628113 to www.opg.me

If Only Neuberger could remember he is a public servant not a stylish entertainer and concentrate on remedy for the public who are being Robbed of their homes freedoms and universal human rights: Neuberger has completely concealed our Magna Carta 1215 are courts of law and justice, Fruitless no remedy exists If Only Neuberger reverted to are basic laws of the land the two saddest words in the English Dictionary If Only.

MARCH 10 2016 Visiter No.628052 to www.opg.me

MARCH 9 2016 Visiter No.628026 to www.opg.me

Only just opened it but I do believe that surrendering mums passport breaches her human rights, that I am not happy about, she has capacity & she has doctors reports that conclude she holds capacity to decide where to live and with whom.
She has capacity to make a will, why should we be blackmailed into apologising to a corrupt court.
Likewise where does this reflect Ann's best interests, would anyone like having their passport removed from them to become a UK prisoner when her will was made to protect her as I am her EXECUTOR that I am of the understanding is the highest office in the land.
Would mum or I feel safe setting foot back into the UK under these terms??
TIPSTAFF - Wikipedia best describes this as a JUDGES THUG.. would you like your mothers passport being removed by a JUDGES THUG??
More thoughts to follows.

MARCH 8 2016 Visiter No.628000 to www.opg.me

For the attention of; THE UNITED KINGDOM corporation c/o
1. Dominic of the BRITISH CONSULATE in Malaga Spain & forwarded to our MP via
3. Judge Jackson & Judge Pelling of the ‘Court of Protection’ in inverted commas
4. Diana Smith [investigator of Land Registry asset stripping FRAUD]
5. Steve Doughty & co at DAILY MAIL ‘bias homophobia’, probably from Jewish masonic links.
6. A cunning, devious, slanderous sister Angela Wild and an Angelized brother Kevin Clarke
UPDATED 11TH March 2016
To ALL concerned parties
ref ANN CLARKE CoP10370284 & 20 year carer and son/heir EXECUTOR mike: clarke
I received an email on 3/3/16 in response to an enquiry of any news? Sent to Diana Smith.
Diana Smith has become friends whom is actually investigating Land Registry Fraud restrictions where we made contact via other campaigners in connection with Court of Protection ongoing asset stripping frauds.
Diana stated in her email the following;
That she was making legal enquiries in reference to our case to gain legal assistance and the response she got was intriguing, in her own words, she was told to stay away from our case and was warned OFF it. She also exposes the total ignorance and in her own words rude arrogance of DAILY MAIL biased reporter Steve Doughty, again demonstrating a common purpose approach to bury the innocent injured parties.
The judiciary ie JACKSON probably refers to this as a conspiracy theory but it clearly is not a conspiracy as is demonstrated in Diana’s enquiry. We are not the only ones, there are countless others who cannot get legal representation when the case involves bar members such as ours, against bar members.
ADD to the above the lack of funding and it’s simply a case of thousands that fall by the wayside that cannot obtain any statute justice what so ever.
This warrants the use of common law and commercial liens, WHY NOT. An affidavit statement of NOTARISED truth, WHY NOT, which has attached financial remedy. PRISON by perjury if untrue!
I realise it gets the snouts out of BAR trough where LAWYERS & BARRISTER & JUDGES believe biasedly so, that the LAW is their business and theirs alone, but this is where the conspiracy actually lies because the law is the law and we are all supposedly equal under it, otherwise we have inequality at arms, as is in our case, that just breeds INJUSTICE, making shed loads more money for them, misery for US.
In the 1st page of our 200 page application there was only 2 sections and section 2 was DAMAGES, Judge JACKSON did not address this in any way, shape or form. IS THIS REALLY BRITISH JUSTICE???
There is in existence, a VOID ORDER by a nominated court of protection JUDGE PELLING 2MA90015 Manchester 14 January 2013 for the committal to prison of MICHAEL CLARKE where this civil procedure was objected to by representations of many, referring to right to be tried by JURY & BIAS.
PELLING proceeded in absentia knowing this was a due process denial and also that he was in delinquent BIAS of his duties knowing that the overall case referred to allegations of FRAUD THEFT MAL ADMINISTRATION and now PERSECUTION from the court of protection, so how can he stand as JUDGE in his own cause, WHY did he not recuse himself in favour of a JURY court after representations where made which he throughout physically. THIS IS A TYRANT performing an act of TREASON.
Likewise JACKSON whose colours have now been firmly fixed to the mast of JUSTICE PIRACY where he clearly needs to be investigated in relation to LAND REGISTRY FRAUD where he has clearly breached the WILLS ACT 1837 contrary to part 24 to deny mum rights that would protect her clearly written in her WILL sanctioned by HIM, in a contradiction so in your face it beggars belief!
TODAY we are now seriously concerned that there is a plot to ABDUCT my mother from the SPANISH HOSPITAL, a conspiracy indeed involving the CONSULATE, the FOREIGN OFFICE & Judge JACKSON.
It is for this reason we do hereby again attach and link the LIVING WILL of mum that does as Jackson states have legal force regarding her now protected future by: mike: clarke whom stands in her office as EXECUTOR to protect her and her estate from FRAUD, THEFT, MAL ADMINISTRATION, PERSECUTION & leading to what we now believe could be ABDUCTION.
We seek the immediate re-assurance of the BRITISH CONSULATE & THE FOREIGN OFFICE that no such action will even be attempted and that without such re-assurance by return we will seek assistance from the SPANISH GOVERNMENT for protection from the UNITED KINGDOM.
1. It may kill my mother
2. She has capacity and is not mentally ill
3. It would breach her living will attached
4. It would be classed as abduction
5. Breach human rights article 8
By: mike: clarke in the protection of ann: clarke ASSURANCES NOW RECEIVED THANK YOU
As per the living will linked here www.opg.me/will20082012.pdf
content of Diana’s email:
Hi Mike
Firstly legal friends are warning me to stay clear of your case, which intrigues me.
I have just spoken to Steve Doughty [I had to ring him]
Nasty little person isn’t he?
I now have just written to him, by way of a reply to his rudeness and copied his editor in.
As you know I want to break the back of Land Registry’s involvement with restrictions and charges when the aim is asset stripping.
Just try and sit tight for now.
I will copy you in if I hear back from anyone at the Daily Mail.
COMMERCIAL LIEN content NOW FOLLOWS IN recent email from mike: clarke to DAILY MAIL Doughty;
Commercial Lien Claim
by: mike: clarke

to Steve Doughty of the DAILY MAIL
to Sam Greenhill of the DAILY MAIL
to the editor of the DAILY MAIL
to the chief of the DAILY MAIL
to JUDGE JACKSON of Court of Protection
Reference DAILY MAIL newspaper article on page 29 dated 25.02.2016
Fugitive Michael Clarke drags his mentally ill 75 year old mother around the world after he blew her £775.000 award
Defamation of character VIA LIABLE & SLANDER
In this action/claim against you STEVE DOUGHTY and co. LISTED ABOVE it is based on a rebuttal of your article on what I know to be the truth and if you can rebut ALL the allegations then there is no claim to be made;
It is my understanding;
1. A newspaper reporter shall report the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth thus his content will be factual and unbiased based on his research etc. and that the failure of such will leave open to such a reporter a claim for defamation of characters do you agree YES or NO if NO please explain in a full rebuttal
2. When you’re appointed freelance photographer reporters found us on the day that you printed your article I asked him why you had gone to print with totally the wrong story to which his reply was, because yesterday we did not know where you were! Do you think you should of waited until you found me or that had you researched a little further you would of found my website where all the facts were there in documented and chronological order… please answer YES or NO if No please provide your reasons in a full rebuttal
3. You had interviewed my sister and brother at their homes for their side of the story and obviously printed some of what they said in haste without fully checking facts in which you have a duty to do… would you agree YES or NO if not please answer in a full rebuttal
4. 20 years ago in 1996 I started caring for my mum without one penny, in fact I was struggling financially and continued to care for 6 years before mum s award came along. Equally after her award ran out in 2012 because of fraud theft mal administration and persecution by the court of protection I then looked after her to date without any money just her state pension and my care allowance of £60 per week so to recap 10 years care without money before and after award and 10 years care in-between with award money. Does this strike you as a man who’s care was based solely on money please answer YES or NO and if you do believe YES please answer in a rebuttal WHY
5. 20 years ago my sister Angela Wild made 2 promises to her mother after her tragic accident in which;
a/ That if mum agreed to sell her then current house to her at a knock down price… Angela would care for her mother indefinitely in that very same house and
b/ That Angela would also pay her mother from the profit a sum of £5000 of which a short time after Angela paid her mother one day £50 off the debt…. Acknowledging that this debt was indeed all agreed leaving a balance of £4950… Weeks later or maybe a couple of months, Angela evicted her own mother out of that house dumping her at my public house saying I cannot do it she will have to go into a home.
Why did she bring her to me? Mum did not want to go into a home and thought she had secured her future with her daughter within what was back then mum’s own home that the daughter Angela Wild had effectively stole.. Because from that day to this she never paid mum one single penny of the balance of £4950 owing to her mother. Do you think that the cunning daughter my sister Angela Wild has misled you, the court, her own mother, her brother… please answer YES or NO if NO please answer in a full rebuttal
6. 20 years ago mum arrived at my then PUBLIC HOUSE in a state of DOUBLE INCONTINENCE and in a wheelchair where spasticity in her legs was fixed at a 90 degree angle and so could not stand up, get to the toilet etc., neither did I have any facilities for her on the ground floor of my pub and neither did I have any accessibility for disabled to go upstairs where I had to carry her in my own 2 arms to bed and bring her down during the day same way.. How much money do you believe I did this for??? PLEASE answer in a full rebuttal
7. The doctors around that time 1997 told me mums chances to walk again were next to zero and that because her legs were fixed at 90 degrees they wanted to cut the ham strings so that she would have more freedom and comfort in bed etc… but I refused this operation instead I talked the doctors into the 2nd option cutting the ham strings halfway and stretching her legs to almost straight in 2 separate operations where after each operation her legs were in plaster paris for 6 weeks and I then had to “drag” mum around with a zimmer frame for months to get her to walk again in which when success came the doctors were dumbfounded, so how much money do you think I did this for??? PLEASE answer in a full rebuttal
8. 1996 Double incontinence mum had because she could not get to a toilet… after her operations 2 off and then months of pains taking care to get her walking against all what doctors had said to be a waste of time it finally paid off and mum could then WALK to the toilet… what would you personally have paid to actually get to that stage yourself if you were in that position… can you just imagine it for one minute.. And then put a value on it… because I did this for LOVE not for money and I did it single handed, no family assistance NONE.. please do not be conceited I actually want your views on this based on money because this is what makes you tick, its what makes my sister tick, the courts business is all based on money and so too are the solicitors so do not skip over this very valuable section respond accordingly
9. It was expressed at the time 1997 of getting mum to walk by the then solicitor LYNDSEY WISE of ALEXANDER HARRIS SOLICITORS whom was pursuing the lawsuit against the health authority that I was damaging the case without specific reference to getting mum to walk she in her money based mind had showed me that her claim of £1.7 million pounds was more important than mum WALKING which of course diminished the claim this is how the system WORKS money, money, money… no thought for mum that it might be in her best interest for her to WALK!!! IF it were you, would YOU rather walk and be a financially lighter please answer in a full rebuttal.
10. The CLAIM at the time of £1.7 million pounds had gathered momentum and we were living in TENERIFE me and mum in a one bedroomed apartment 1999 where by the year 2000 arrived my sister ANGELA wanted her mother living back in the UK with her and in order to help facilitate this reported that we were living in Tenerife off a credit card in mother s name running up a bill… the truth of course is.. that benefits had temporary been stopped upon investigation where my MP was brought in to correct matters and the time this took needed a financial filler and ANGELA was well aware of this as the credit card application for mum went to MY mums old house that ANGELA had thrown her mother out of and ANGELA fraudulently signed this application in her mother name in order that she could have a financial filler but then later reported this credit card abuse as though it was me to the lawsuit solicitor LYNDSAY WISE causing huge waves in the overall case that had to be settled early for a sum that was less than half of the original claim.. ARE you beginning to get the picture of how devious a sister/daughter will and can be in order to get at the money where ever it may be ie., £4950 owed to mum from mums house sale cheap to her daughter in exchange for a promise to be cared for there, then to be thrown out onto the street!!! Later reported in credit card fraud that ANGELA facilitated by signature! DO YOU THINK ANGELA WILD is devious??
11. 2001 the money arrived and so did the world and his dog wanting to wipe ANNs arse… after doing this for 6 years without a shilling… all of a sudden… all kinds of people came out from the woodwork… and who was on the hit list to be removed 1st do you think??? Well after looking back on it now I can clearly say it was me, they all wanted me out of the way and so the conspiracy began… it started with the disagreement as to where mum should live and that this was all in the face of 2 clinical doctors stating mum had capacity to manage her own affairs, live where she wanted and with whom. THE STORY is unreal and continued from that day to this one that we are in right now, I could easily have written a book via the website diary www.opg.me . The 1st real financial abuse came in year one 2001 when the appointed deputy HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES paid mum £200 a week to live whilst he STOLE £507 weekly??? 1st years charges £26,377 supposed to be £2000 can you find out what this was for?? Because we can’t? The corruption hides behind a facade of client confidentiality. SO do you think that these charges are reasonable?? Please answer
12. 2008 after disillusionment in the UK we emigrated to SPAIN. OUT of the jurisdiction of the UK and with capacity reports 2 off mum requested her remaining cash estate of £220,000 but was refused by the Office of the Public Guardian/Court of Protection. After the euro of 1.5 to the pound started plummeting causing huge stress and over 5 years of wrangling writing to all known official bodies the COURT lost mum £100,000 in exchange rate losses by 2012 this was under the guise of the court of protection a position of PARENS PATREA not my control as you so boldly mention in your article but the deputy appointed agent of the court of protection… what you stated was defamation was it not??? YES or NO if NO please rebut
13. 2012 money ran out by no fault of mine as we had tried to prevent that… all provable?? YES do you agree?? If not please explain WHY?
14. A court convened to deliver a committal order to prison must be under law one, of a nature of FAIR, IMPARTIAL & UNBIASED nature agree YES or NO if NO please answer.
15. JACKSON did not issue a prison sentence in 2013 can you confirm YES or NO and if your answer is YES as in your article please explain WHY because his name was PELLING and it was UNPUBLISHED.
16. WHY was it UNPUBLISHED?? PELLING was a NOMINATED COURT of PROTECTION Judge, Judging in his own cause by delinquent BIAS as my claims of FRAUD THEFT MAL ADMINISTRATION were all against the state owned and operated BAR/Court of Protection a collection of fraud enablers using the facade of client confidentiality to cover criminality, a BIAS is UNLAWFUL.. Do you agree it needs a JURY and if NOT WHY NOT…. PLEASE ANSWER
17. You claim my mother is mentally ill… we hold reports to the contrary 4 off please answer with factual evidence to back up your advertised story claiming what you do about my mother whom incidentally has capacity.. please answer
18. The COURT of Protections jurisdiction STOPS at the borders of ENGLAND & WALES since when and where does it state its jurisdiction is worldwide please answer
19. A person whom holds a clinical neuro specialist doctors report that confirms she has capacity to decide where to live in the world and with whom should not have her HUMAN RIGHTS article 8 taken from her… Entitlement to a private life… would you agree yes or NO if NO please provide a full rebuttal response
20. A persons rights under article 6 a fair trial giving full due process is a HUMAN RIGHT do you agree and if NOT why not?? Please provide a detailed response…
21. That a GAY person/carer is entitled by law without any problem what so ever to take his mother to a GAY event YES would you agree or not if not please answer with lawful reason
22. That a GAY person can photograph his mother with male models if she so wishes to have that photo taken yes would you agree or not if not please answer in full
23. Your article not only repulsive in lies demonstrated above, was also soaked in anti-GAY sentiment showing your homophobia of racial discrimination yes do you agree or not if not why not please respond with clear and precise answers
24. The court of protections purpose is to protect and provide for a person’s needs ….. Where in JACKSON’s latest judgement does he take care of Ann’s needs…. In 2015 November I submitted a statement to the court explaining Ann’s needs… one of which was a proper BED… one that might have prevented bed sores??? Are you getting the picture?? Ann made the application NOT me.. to sell her house on the 31st of JULY 2015 marked URGENT… do you think this kind of treatment is correct… yes or no if YES please explain in full
25. In 2013 when we were persecuted out of our own country into exile leaving behind all Ann’s facilities ie walking aids bed etc & HOME… ANN could walk onto a plane and walk off one but 2 years of persecution without all Ann’s needs being met she finally succumbed to NOT being able to WALK approx. 9 months ago to a year who would you say is to blame??? Do you really think the 20 year carer son stole and mal administered Ann’s finances that were under the control of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN/Court of Protection????? NO or YES if yes please explain in full and I mean in FULL
26. The six figure pay out was under the court of protection whom failed to protect it.. in fact they plundered it in acts of fraud THEFT etc and then tried to cover their actions by trying unlawfully to get the 20 yr carer son into prison to STOP SILENCE GAGG and PERVERT any common law justice being sought under a COMMERCIAL LIEN statement affidavit of the NOTARISED truth being published…. They falsely used harassment laws to generate their false claim and denied representation in an act of treasonable due process denial, ALL in blatant acts of misconducts in public office that you by your article have added weight to in defamation of our characters that your publics comments 700 of copied have not fallen for, seeing through with ease the lies portrayed that you are guilty of… AGREED yes or NO if no please answer
27. The law provides that if a notice is published that material content cannot be used from a website or indeed a facebook page without the express permission of the owner and that on a prior date this >> NOTICE TO FACEBOOK OR GOVERNMENTS OR AGENTS OF By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. THIS was published on my facebook page which by the use of my photos and videos and written context the DAILY MAIL have clearly breached and as such are liable for damages. AGREED yes or no if NO please provide in full your reply
28. The damages that I claim extend to the worldwide publicity that has resulted from the DAILY MAIL article into the USA & EUROPE via THE SUN, The EURO WEEKLY and USA NEWS + BBC TV, that the damage caused is probably beyond recovery and where notice was issued last week to s.doughty@dailymail.co.uk he has failed to respond with even an acknowledgement shows to me that he feels safe in his contempt that he can print what he likes without fear from a carer whom he describes as on the run without any money to pursue him for harm and loss and so this affidavit commercial lien will represent such a claim under common law and a response would be welcome by way of an apology and retraction to start with and without it please respond here as to WHY??
29. The trust I had in the Daily Mail to uncover Court Of Protection wrong doing was demonstrated in my emails to the judge or the court on lots of matters over 5 years that were actually copied in to the managingeditor@dailymail.co.uk where a response never came but was the address used by other victims and so too I started using… to have such a massive major abuse of this trust thrown right in my face in just what can only be described as a pack of lies was personally extremely damaging and I believe the comments on the article, that incidentally I have tried to make and not been allowed, show the public feel let down by the DAILY MAIL and rightly so.. Such damages should reflect the injuries caused… anything to the contrary RESPOND.
30. The word ‘FUGITIVE’ I have placed into inverted comma’s as your paper did in the article about Stephen Fry and his ‘HUSBAND’ expressing again the DAILY MAIL ‘journalists’ homophobic tendencies, meaning to cast doubt as in a ‘FUGITIVE’ of justice when in reality there has been NO JUSTICE offered only TYRANTS performing TREASON to suit a STOP SILENCE GAGG & PERVERTION of real common law justice taking place, so without the real hard facts and truth ‘YOU’ are committing acts of defamation from gutter press ‘JOURNALISM’ probably by reason that 96% of the world’s media is JEWISH owned, alongside UK COURTS coming under JEWISH rules ie HEAD of the SUPREME court Lord Neuberger a JEW presiding over Christian JUSTICE! THIS is called TALMUD LAW by STEALTH and TALMUDIC LAW rules indicates that Christians have no rights to PROPERTY MONEY or JUSTICE! DOES all this stench smell, of a vile conspiracy to defame, intimidate and DEFRAUD JUSTICE?? PLEASE respond I will be interested to see your JEWISH MASONIC rebuttal!
31. PROPERTY MONEY & JUSTICE have all been denied to ANN CLARKE, ann: clarke can go abroad and be free to go, but the Jewish UK ‘Christian’ courts ARE IN FACT denying ann: her right to EXCHANGE, SELL or BUY PROPERTY anywhere else in the WORLD with her own estate of money and property, ALL in the face of 4 doctors that provided clinical examinations attesting to her capacity resulting in FRAUD, THEFT, MAL ADMINSTRATION & PERSECUTION! Show me your rebuttal with evidence to support JUSTICE has been served upon ANN & mike.
32. ANNs carer has been the subject of aspersions cast upon him by persons with only hearsay and after serving documents recorded delivery requiring that the BROTHER Kevin Clarke & the SISTER Angela Wild provide tangible proof of so called financial concerns NONE HAS BEEN PROVIDED but yet the carer/EXECUTOR of 20 years is providing chronological proof of the FRAUDs THEFTs and MAL ADMINISTRATION on www.opg.me of his mother’s estate by the United Kingdom corporation PUBLIC GUARDIANS agent/deputy HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES whom, is being backed by JEWdiciary of the court of protection, PROTECTING THEMSELVES, please provide your rebuttal showing proof of the newspapers aspersions cast.
33. FRAUD, The sister/daughter has in matter of fact stole from her mother by stealth cash & 2 previous properties known as 53 Kensington Avenue Royton Oldham & 12 Watlington Close Sholver Oldham and is currently via the court of protection attempting to gain the 3rd.. Please show in your rebuttal how a daughter/brother should have any input what so ever in their own mothers life when that mother holds medical evidence to support her capacity to choose her own life choices on where to live and with whom… FRAUD in my eyes to suit a money based business COURT.. Please respond demonstrating where the justice is in this?
34. RACKETEERING if you look up the word is what best describes what is in effect going on… The Court of Protection does nothing but to protect its own racketeering of GROSS FUDICIARY TRUST FRAUDS that the conspiring media behind them have teamed up to help undermine a single man’s attempt to expose the corruption leading to the question HOW MUCH DID YOU GET to write the story?? Please respond to rebut racketeering allegations and fee for story.
35. Commercial Liens are a common law remedy where statute remedy no longer exists as per demonstrated in the letter by Diana Smith where when seeking representation for this case she was warned off it, this being the case in all attempts to get representation not just by me but others too fighting court of protection corruption ie Gary Hollis, Len Lawrence, Jean James etc to name but a few.. we also on our website document many news articles mainly on JUDGES stating the current JUSTICE system is unfit for the poor, on this basis the court of protection now has a free for all to do just what it pleases without fear, with impunity, it can freely just financially rape the vulnerable and WHO is going to STOP them?? WELL it is my goal to STOP them via commercial liens and when such a commercial lien is only a statement of truth that has been notarised what might one begin to ask is why should that be a problem?? When, is it not a fact, the truth is what we aim to expose otherwise the BAR has a monopoly on any lies they choose to accept as the truth. In reality also an untruth in a commercial lien is punishable by perjury and result in prison. SO if the commercial lien process is not acceptable please answer fully as to why not?
36. SLANDER is a word used today by my sister in response to this document but she has now been placed on notice that I have documents awaiting service upon her that will in turn be placed upon the land registry against her property’s because the SLANDER started in this case from her herself on several occasions is now required the documentary evidence to support such hearsay slander that she has used that in turn the DAILY MAIL has relied upon to print such a defamatory article that has left no choice but to find remedy. I accuse you the DAILY MAIL of slander, liable and defamation without any evidence to back it up.. please respond.
37. I will now turn my attention further to Ann’s BEST INTERESTS
FRAUD The first best interest for Ann would be that the court of protection via the OPG had NOT committed FRAUD upon her by not respecting her carer’s actions on reporting FRAUD and in fact trying to dispose of him to prison for whistleblowing a multi-billion pound on going FRAUD not just on Ann but many others too such as the LEONARD LAWRENCE case, the Gary HOLLIS case, the YVONNE GODER case, the PETER HOFSHROER case, the JEAN JAMES case and countless other victims, too many to mention many being falsely imprisoned such as WANDA MADDOCKS case and the KATHY DANBY case. FRAUDS which at best, the investigation from the OPG had to offer lasted 7 long months and resulted in a 3 line email saying no wrong had been done! WHOSE best interest was THAT in?? THE London PRO BONO charity barristers analysis of the case in January last year identified with ease a case to answer for Ann’s losses which even after reporting these facts the court of protection conveniently ignore. Not only ignoring this but also ignoring ALL other facts that have not been in Ann’s Best Interests.
38. THEFT- It is in Ann’s best interest that THEFT reported be acted upon and thoroughly investigated by POLICE which has been reported 4 times but that white collar crimes of FRAUD are very low on the priority of the POLICE because they judge each reported crime on the potential merit of a prosecution in which it is a well-documented FACT that the criminal element running the show prefer COVER UP before EXPOSURE – Not in Ann’s best interest.
39. MAL ADMINISTRATION – For Ann’s best interest it would be, that the court of protection to get its house in order where there currently is no accountability, not just accountability of Ann’s estate but the accountability of JUDGES whom are acting ultra vires now on an industrial scale of treasonous acts ignoring their OATHS of OFFICE that are not in Ann’s best interests.
40. CRIMINAL NEGLECTION of INDUSTRIAL SCALE – In Ann’s best interest it would have been best to address the 200 page http://opg.me/urgentapplication01092015.pdf by the reduced 8 page http://opg.me/jacksonorder.pdf with the 5 page http://opg.me/vacateyourorder.pdf NOTICE plus these 6 pages here being a total of 219 pages of CRIMINAL NEGLECTION by a dereliction of JUDICIAL DUTY under parens patriae which is finally capped with the 5 pages here of http://opg.me/NOTICEOFMISPRISIONofTREASON.pdf TOTAL = 224 pages.
41. PERSECUTION – Of Ann and her carer is not in her best interests either and it would be Ann’s best interest to put a STOP to THAT with immediate effect by the removal of PELLINGs VOID order but that the ruling criminal elite will no doubt continue… NOT in Ann’s best interest.
42. If this court really want to act in Ann’s best interest –
a) Provide accountability and scrutiny of Ann’s stolen estate to a forensic level as obviously there has been and is prima facia evidence to support an investigation.
b) Provide accountability in the court arena where when required such as here under COMMON LAW required that it is not retained under the ADMIRALTY LAW of the SEA
c) Provide Judicial accountability instead of just words ie in your own words JACKSON ‘the law is completely inaccessible to those it was intended’ NICE WORDS now ACTION
d) Provide proof that the state has Ann’s best interests at heart because where I stand NOW as EXECUTOR I have seen NONE.. not just in Ann’s case but many others too.
e) The STATE of the UK STATE is such that criminality is running rampant throughout its fabric of governmental departments and justice systems that cannot be denied. THIS clearly is NOT in Ann’s best interest to be any future part of it in it’s current form.
f) WITHOUT clear and concise actions to remedy each and every persons claim of injustice, matters are only going to spiral out of control downwards a fact We attach as financial remedy £1 million pounds per bullet point that is NOT fully responded to that shall be applied with vicarious liability to STEVE DOUGHTY, SAM GREENHILL, The Editor and Chief to be later named and documented. TOTAL VALUE £42 MILLION POUNDS


Please respond to email mike@rake.net

The LINK between the Daily Mail Editor Paul Michael Dacre and the Court of Protection can be seen on Wikipedia where the founder of the Court of Protection JACK STRAW and him were mates.
Dacre was born and grew up in the London suburb of Arnos Grove in Enfield.[7] His father, Peter, was a journalist on the Sunday Express whose work included show business features.[8][9][10] His brother, Nigel, was editor of ITV's news programmes from 1995 to 2002.[11]
He was educated at University College School, an independent school in Hampstead, on a state scholarship,[12] where he was head of house.[13] In his school holidays, he worked as a messenger at the Sunday Express, and during his pre-university gap year as a trainee in the Daily Express.[10] From 1967 he read English at the University of Leeds,[14] where Jack Straw was President of the Student's Union,[13] and during this period met his future wife, Kathleen,[2][12] now a professor of drama studies.[6] One of their two sons,[2] James, is a theatre director.[15][16]
While at university, he became involved with the Leeds Student newspaper, rising to the position of editor. At this time he identified with the liberal end of the political spectrum on issues including gay rights and drug use,[17] and wrote editorials in support of a student sit-in at Leeds organised by Straw.[18] "'If you don’t have a left-wing period when you go to university, you should be shot'", he has said.[10] On graduation in 1971, he joined the Daily Express in Manchester for a six-month trial;[12] after this he was given a full-time job on the Express. Concerning his career choice, Dacre commented in an interview for the British Journalism Review in 2002 that he "never any desire to do anything other than journalism".[10]

MARCH 8 2016 Visiter No.627990 to www.opg.me
EURO WEEKLY NEWS another paper to persue

FEBRUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.627640 to www.opg.me
ALL lies of course totally the opposite and the comments from the public show their contempt for the Daily Mail in not looking further into the real truth before printing such truth instead of a pack of lies designed to further intimidate the injured parties.

FEBRUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.627190 to www.opg.me
Today on the 15th February 2016 after several consultations with the Doctor that had not truely sunk in we make a plea on compassionate grounds that their prison order be removed so mum can be brought home to die. For THE VERY URGENT ATTENTION of
15th February 2016
Ref cases 10370284 and Manchester 2MA90015
From the occupant of the office of EXECUTOR Of both estates ANN CLARKE and MICHAEL CLARKE
I, mike clarke, do hereby state as per doctors in SPAIN, that my mother’s medical condition is more than likely terminal.
I require out of compassionate respect, that your prison order, considered void, as per supplied statements, be removed with immediate effect on compassionate grounds in order that I may return my mum home to her property to die in the place she originally wanted to be till her demise surrounded by her family.
The doctor’s prognosis is such that she has a serious hip bone infection from a bed sore, which is so serious that their prognosis is that death is very likely, given time.
Mum has been removed of IV therapy and is receiving the relevant drugs orally as well as hydration.
She is currently smiling and upbeat and not currently showing signs of fever from septicaemia and as such her current condition would benefit from a 2 hour flight home.
My sister whom has returned to the UK today tried to talk mum into leaving without me, apparently, in which mum became irritable and agitated saying NO she would not go without me.
This matter is serious and is short and to the point, mum is terminally ill and I believe if she has the slightest of chance to actually get through this then she needs her own home.
By mike clarke EXECUTOR...
please act urgently, please!! Mikes Mobile 0034 602568239

FEBRUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.627111 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.627083 to www.opg.me
ANN MALLABY How is your mum, Mike? Have you been able to get her treatment? If desperate, consider in-home IV therapy. As you know, Britain's a dangerous place for the elderly - they're too readily terminated. Shazad Hussain tried to prevent the termination (murder) of his brother Nazam after he 'fell' out of a top storey window at the council's flagship nursing home. The senior officer warned him there'd be "repercussions" if he sued them: they brought a malicious prosecution of fraud and he's now in prison. His disabled mum and schizophrenic brother relied on Shazad, their sole carer. They'll most likely be taken into 'care' now, and terminated. What a terrible regime we live under! Family carers being imprisoned and their dependants terminated. You're doing your best for your mum, all credit to you. Kind regards Ann

FEBRUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.627053 to www.opg.me
AWAKE EARLY AND WORRIED AT 6am I write this statement. The UK GOV. authorities are culpable with gross criminal negligence of attempted murder of my mother.
On the date ??? I made a statement demonstrating the URGENCY for the release of mums property to sell it.. within that statement contain her requirements, one of which was a proper bed for her etc. The original application was made 6 months ago on the 31st JULY 2015
The MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICE being played out by a posse of names ie Joanne EARLEY Court of Protection manager whom had previously apologised for a 2 months delay, losing her application, served me a court order by email, accepted honourably, but in return I issued documents to the JUDGE that she acted in DISHONOUR by refusal to serve... same for Judge Jacksons email clerk ALEXANDER MORTON whom also has failed to respond to 4 emails requiring confirmation of documents delivered.
Taken all round one also can attach by vicarious liability the culpable negligence to our MP Gordon Mardens office of silence in the face of urgent responses to a RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION and his failure to act.
Attending to my mothers needs right NOW being the urgent matter it is to be noted that it be my intention to seek advice from MICHAEL DOHERTY about proceeding with private prosecutions of the above liable parties and associated collegues for what may turn out to be a MURDER charge by culpable NEGLIGENCE.
Currently we start this particular day off with a sum total of 7 euros in our pocket. Me n James in a temporary apartment that is in Benalmadena we must make the journey to the hospital in Torremolinos by bus and foot, the bus for 2 costs 3 euros 10 cent each way equals 6 euros 20 cent leaving us .80 cent to eat. I have blisters on my feet from the walking as the bus does not drop off at the hospital there is a walk to do each day. TWICE.
As thursday tomorrow approaches we will only be able to walk to the hospital and my feet will certainly not be in any fit state to do that.
I hate to ask but if anyone out there has the where with all and facility to help we would appreciate it no matter how small.. even a lift to the hospital tomorrow would help but anyone who may want to donate mums account is HSBC 401213 32083639 CLARKE

FEBRUARY 9 2016 Visiter No.627040 to www.opg.me
MUM FINALLY SETTLED WITH A TREATMENT REGIME More improvements to mums appearance and ability to eat and the doctor warned that we were far from out of the woods. We now knew we had took the right decision to fly mum out of THAILAND back to EUROPEAN health care as the bill would of been unaffordable.

FEBRUARY 8 2016 Visiter No.627020 to www.opg.me
3rd HOSPITAL ADMISSION The Doctor here repeated the hip infection seriousness and said that her potential to die was strong but, as long as there was no fever appear in her we were in with a chance subject to mums response of the drug therapy treatment currently being administered with re-hydration etc. MUM was already showing distinct signs of improvement with the return of her ability to swallow and talk and so we began feeding her ourselves alongside the hospital. My sister and brother were telephoned because of the seriousness of potential death and thus my sister arrived at night with eldest grandson Jay. Mum made slight improvements

FEBRUARY 7 2016 Visiter No.627000 to www.opg.me
ADMISSION TO HOSPITAL TODAY Midday transferrred mum by taxi to BENALMADENA Evolution hospital for assessment. After 6 hours mum was transferred to University hospital Malaga. Her condition described as poor but vital organs ok.. infections detected in urine and kidney and more serious in her HIP. The doctor here after asking about her hips and what had occured he went on to say that my diagnosis of mosquito bite was untrue and that her hip infection was the result of a bed sore from the lack of turning or movement during her sleep that she had had for some time. The infection he said was very serious and potentially life threatening. Later that day she was transferred again to the MARITIMO Hopital Torremolinos.

FEBRUARY 6 2016 Visiter No.626980 to www.opg.me
MOSCOW TO MALAGA We boarded in full snow on the ground a flight to MALAGA SPAIN that was 5 hours duration arriving in Spain at 11pm... mum was so tired I could not place her into hospital to have her sitting around being prodded and poked so decided to try get her settled for the 1st night in a hotel which we did.

FEBRUARY 5 2016 Visiter No.626950 to www.opg.me
URGENTLY LEAVING THAILAND 1030am we passed security at BANGKOK airport and boarded the 10 hour flight to MOSCOW RUSSIA. Upon seating mum in her seat I noticed a little seapage of blood upon her thigh hip left side and slightly panicked. The plane was nearly full and James calmed me down and said not to panick its because we have been moving her around it will quickly qualagulate and stop. We left Bangkok. The flight in the main was OK but after 8 hours mum was beginning to show signs of pain, we managed to lie her down where she appeared to get some sleep. After arriving in MOSCOW that was a foot deep in snow we sat down to take stock. [We considered claiming political asylum in RUSSIA from UK Court of Protection JEWdicial TERRORISM but after seeing the snow on the ground MUM said it was TOO COLD]

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626920 to www.opg.me
URGENT TIME TO DECIDE ON WHAT TO DO My partner of 7 years JAMES MCDERMOTT[24] and I, having duscussed the dire situation we were in where the courts, MP etc were now failing to respond to anything leaving mum vulnerable to death decided that James would ask his father to loan him 1000 pounds. After informing his mother then his father of this request at approx 4pm by 7pm it was in his bank. We then discussed the option of taking mum to THAI hospital and paying the 1000 as deposit for treatment but we expected her prognosis was such that it required a longer stay in hospital and could not keep up with required payments. The Cheapest fastest flight out was available at 10am the following day. WE BOOKED it and hastilly packed.

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626880 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626870 to www.opg.me
Re: Re- where you are in Thailand
To diansmt5
Hi Diana
we are in PATTAYA
The hospital today will NOT admit mum without 50,000 baht on deposit (£1000)
I only had £200 so could not proceed and so mum is just sat here waiting to DIE.
I have tried more food and different drinks but it is very laboured and she is only achieving at best a quarter of what is put before her. She has lost weight and the matter deteriorates by each day.
JAMESs my partner has been trying to raise money via his family which as of yet is of no avail.
Do not know what to do.
THIS application to release mums property IMMEDIATELY was put into the court as an URGENT MATTER last JULY 2015.
What more can I do??
anxious son and 20 year carer of mum 75 disabled with capacity
On February 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM diansmt5@aol.com wrote:

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626868 to www.opg.me
-----Original Message-----
From: diansmt5
To: lyttonj
Sent: Thu, Feb 4, 2016 11:35 AM
Subject: Re- Elderly lady being put at risk by Land Registry involvement of her property
Diana Smith
Corner Farm
Rotten Row
Theddlethorpe St Helen
LN12 1NX
Dear Sir
games are being played with a ladies life , by restrictions placed at Land Registry in regard of a property she owns in Blackpool.
This lady who has been forced to flee England with her long term carer ( her son) , to Thailand, urgently needs medical care and admitting to a hospital today.
Previously her medical fees have been funded by well wishers and because of the urgency of her needs , there is not time to raise funds again to enable acting immediately.
The MP involved is Gordon Marsden and l have had two calls today from a gentleman named john in this MP's Office.
There has to be procedures to release funds this lady is entitled to . If she was resident in the UK , the medical fees potentially would be fifteen times as much as hospital costs where she is presently situated.
Can you advise this MP?
We are likely to see more and more cases like this , as Land Registry, once involved , lack any moral fibre or flexibility and sidestep the real issues of their involvement in what is more and more being perceived as government targeting of vulnerable persons for asset stripping.
Previously Jonathan Smithers in writing assured me that The Law Society is well aware,of the methodology of the fraud behind "over-riding interests" and the complications the open register at Land Registry has allowed, as this was when he headed up the Property / Land Fraud Division of the Law Society and he is now President of The Law Society, with no changes happening to victims of these crimes, perhaps he can be challenged on these very issues?
Kind regards
Diana Smith. Tel. 01507 473053 diansmt5@aol.com

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626860 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626857 to www.opg.me

We also wrote to the NEWSPAPER "THE MATURE TIMES" who we are led to believe are considering publishing the theft of old folks homes.

FEBRUARY 4 2016@3.30am Thai Visiter No.626842 to www.opg.me
She is sleeping soundly at the minute but in the morning we are taking her down to the hospital in THAILAND to receive treatment as she has not been well at all. She is sleeping right now & we THANK YOU again to friends, Steve P & Andy K & Steve H whom have raised some cash to be able to do this and we will keep you all posted.

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626841 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.626798 to www.opg.me

BROTHER & SISTER request for help... Regardless of all our differences and that they do not agree with their mothers wishes I remember when our father died of throat cancer and there was no money for the funeral and we all had to fork out £800 each for the £2400 burial. This of course was no problem so why now should it be a problem to help their own mother, to keep her alive, in circumstances where the UK state has stole by fraud and mal administration from her estate, forcing her by persecution into exile as refugees from our homeland, effectively cleansed in an act genocide by a GROSS FUDICIARY TRUST FRAUD of the LEGAL NAME forcing innocents into MARITIME ADMIRALTY jurisdiction against their will, so they can plunder estates to the point of causing death. PLEASE SHARE FAR AND WIDE


BUT yet she has the money to fly to THAILAND and to force her mother back to the UK?? 3 flights@£400 = £1200 KEEP in mind of course that mum is unfit to fly currently and that is if she actually wanted to go, otherwise force would be used.
30 minutes later 2nd MESSAGE from SISTER

REPLY 2 messages received: Remember 20 years ago when you dropped her off at my pub, sorry, dumped her at my pub, saying you could not do it, she needed to go into a care HOME! Why did you do that? Why did you not take her to a care home? I took her in to my pub and have cared for her 20 years and now you SAY.. I am killing her!! HOW utter dispicable you are.

REPLY DID all the other victims of persecution, theft and fraud also fabricate evidence that they have too?? Too many to mention here but a few; LEONARD LAWRENCE PILOT had a house of £750,000 was incapacitated and woke up to find his house had been sold and so had no where to live with only £82,000 change! YVONNE GODER, GARY HOLLIS & his brother ADRIAN, JEAN JAMES, 90 yr old NORMAN SCARTH and many many others not discounting PETER HOFSCHROER, read it, and his mum living in AUSTRIA, a part of EUROPE where his brother whom worked in social service came to AUSTRIA had him arrested on false charges whilst SOCIAL SERVICES UK his brother, abducted the mother BARBARA on to a flight back to UK. EUROPE is all party to the FRAUDs. YOU HAVE NO IDEA whats going on do you? YOU think you own your own house! YOU DONT!

FEBRUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.626778 to www.opg.me

Again my mum is unwell and cannot access her own wealth to fund health care because of RESTRICTIONS by the court of protection probate racketeering mafia, when she has already been financially raped by them, when all along, could prove her capacity. LET it be known here and NOW the UNITED KINGDOM perpetrators of the current RAPE & potential MURDER is JUDGE JACKSON & JUDGE PELLING who have acted outside their remit ultravirusly, treasonously and negligently causing harm, loss and injury probably going to result in MURDER!
I will personally hold all involved fully responsible should my mother progessively become more ill and let this be a warning for you here and NOW! The same shall apply to civil servants such as the vicariously liable MPs GORDON MARSDEN, Sec of STATE for Justice MICHEAL GOVE, attorney general JEREMY WRIGHT and others for this is now becoming a VERY serious matter to me & mum.

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626759 to www.opg.me
Joanne Earley to mike@rake.net
Dear Mike Clarke,
I have nothing further to add to my email of the 1st February 2016 and I will not be acknowledging any further similar messages.
Joanne Earley
Operations Manager
Court of Protection
T: 020 7421 8722
M: 078 2606 9598

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626752 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626748 to www.opg.me
& head of courts administration Jillian KAY
Dear Michael, Jeremy, Jillian & Gordon
I am copying you in to the email exchange yesterday with the court of protection manager JOANNE EARLEY.
It would appear to me that JOANNE EARLEY is committing MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE in an effort to PERVERT the course of JUSTICE.
It is becoming extremely urgent that this matter is looked into and properly as matters appear totally unjust & unfair breaching HUMAN RIGHTS.
We have been seeking our RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION to Parliament through our MP Gordon Marsden which would appear to be to no avail.
It seems OK for the COURT to serve me by email but to serve back by email or even recorded delivery mail - refused!!!
by: mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626747 to www.opg.me
As per our last email which you were copied in below.
The court of protection appear to be picking and choosing which NOTICES to serve on JUDGES and which not!!
THIS to me is MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC office perverting the course of justice.
Therefore can I have confirmation from YOU that all notices in the email below have been served on JUDGE JACKSON.
If not can you please tell the exact process to complete such a service ie
1.his private home mailing address which I am currently researching
2.or the full address for sessions house Preston or
3.what other method you deem fit and proper to serve JUDGE JACKSON
by: mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626729 to www.opg.me
RE: copied Fwd: confirmation required of service
To Joanne Earley — managingeditor and 7 others
Can I just get this correct.
Are you saying that a NOTICE to a JUDGE cannot be served to his place of BUSINESS ie Court of Protection??
If that is so can you please advise by return HOW IS A JUDGE SERVED relevant NOTICEs??
for example a JUDICIAL NOTICE?
Or at the very least what is the address for service of documents for Court of Protection JUDGES, PELLING & JACKSON??
I do have recorded delivery receipts for them.. are you saying the COURT refuses to serve them, having signed for them???
It seems a little confusing when the documents are VERY relevant to the overall case and that your saying I cannot serve a JUDGE through a COURT OF PROTECTION ADDRESS.
It does seem hypocritical when you want to serve me by email and I honourably accept, IS THE COURT ACTING IN DISHONOUR?
Please respond immediately that I may refer the matter to my MP and the ATTORNEY GENERAL and Sec of State for Justice Michael GOVE.
Considering I am in EXILE half way round the world do you think that this is a court acting in HONOUR and in the best interest of terrorised patient with CAPACITY??
Of THE NOTICES CONCERNED.... can you please indicate which ones you have chose NOT to serve which may I point out would indicate an offence of MISCONDUCT IN A PUBLIC OFFICE assuming you are the person deciding what to serve and what not to serve?
http:​//opg.​me/urgentapplication01092015.​pdf​ ORIGINAL APPLICATION NOTICE
http:​//opg.​me/jacksonorder.​pdf​ REQUESTED STATEMENT NOTICE
http:​//opg.​me/vacateyourorder.​pdf​ NOTICE TO JUDGE PELLING
http:​//opg.​me/statementtojackson2016.​pdf​ STATEMENT REQUESTED NOTICE
Regards by: mike: clarke

On February 1, 2016 at 6:27 PM Earley, Joanne wrote:
Dear Mike Clarke,
I am writing in response to your email below, documents that you have been directed to file by the court will be forwarded to Mr Justice Peter Jackson, but the court will not serve other documents on your behalf.
Joanne Earley Operations Manager
Court of Protection T: 020 7421 8722 M: 078 2606 9598
From: mike rake.net [mailto:mike@rake.net] Sent: 29 January 2016 09:12
To: Earley, Joanne
Subject: copied Fwd: confirmation required of service

NO RESPONSE received - copied and re sent to JOANNE EARLEY
---------- Original Message ----------
From: mike rake.net
To: joanne.earley
Date: January 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM
Subject: confirmation required of service

COURT of Protection MANAGER
Dear Joanne
I hope this email finds you well.
7 DAYS/ONE WEEK AGO ie 20.1.2016
I served upon the court previously the attached or linked below 2 documents;
http:​//opg.​me/executorletters.​pdf​ EXECUTOR LETTERS TO PELLING AND JACKSON
Will you please confirm by return that both these JUDGES were indeed served with the above documents??
I also would like you to note from hereon in NOT to refer to me as MISTER/Mr as my name is mike or michael raymond: clarke.
This is by small case letters and not higher case any infringement is a breach of trademark & copyright of the ALL CAPS estate name that is indeed a legal fiction corporation entity copyrighted trademarked
regards mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626696 to www.opg.me
In July 2015 my mum and I decided it best to stay out of the UK for good due to the outrageous criminality that is obviously exposed here within our website that is running rampant unabated.
A simple task one might assume, to sell up and live in another kingdom elsewhere in the world.
THE criminals within the UK are preventing this and have been so for a very long time.
THEY hold absolutely NO jurisdiction to do what they are doing and their rule books and law books presumeably have been thrown out the window.
Their frauds fully exposed, they still, have not responded to all lawful approaches, and so February is likely to bring even grander charges to lay at their feet.
In the meantime my disabled mum continues to suffer at their hands at the age of 75. She has not been in her own safe n comfortable environment now for 3 whole years. Denied access to disabled facilities all geared up for her. SUCH a starvation has led to her physical and mental deteriation that is bringing about an early demise.
Its perhaps as well that a VOID fraudulent order of committal to prison is in place because such injustice calls for retribution on a grand scale, a scale that reflects the crimes that have been purpotrated upon my own flesh and blood disabled mother.
LIFE was hard enough just dealing with the day to day hour by hour routines, but to take on JEWdicialterrorism.com taboo is another mountain to climb.

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626695 to www.opg.me

Published on 31 Jan 2016 Truth on Billboards on the roadside. Why? Because it's illegal to use a legal name. You were set up as a criminal, a felon since birth, via the legal name fraud scam that fleeces humanity by their own ignorant consent.

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626682 to www.opg.me

Published on 11 Dec 2015
www.thctrust.org - http://texmason.com/SPC/7.pdf

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626671 to www.opg.me

The Court of Protection JEWdiciary, ie PELLING & JACKSON were served their treason notice on the 20th January 2016 by recorded delivery in which they were given 10 days to respond, that expires today.
Failing such response we are NOW in tacit agreement by acquiescence of the said content.
The Jewdiciary were also served 3 times an OCCUPANT of the OFFICE of EXECUTOR NOTICE & LETTER for the ESTATES of ANN CLARKE & MICHAEL CLARKE instructing them to act in accordance with the filed statements & affidavids of truth, in the form of commercial liens, that were NOTARISED and cured / perfected over the times permitted which now stand as the TRUTH in law, with financial penalties attached as remedy.
As an honourable man, I have and are, providing ample opportunity to these men to justly correct their injustices that they have been a party to.
LET it hereby be known by this entry, that the clock is ticking with time running out before I seek higher penalties.

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626670 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626665 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 30 2016 Visiter No.626664 to www.opg.me
David Robinson -
Good afternoon rebels.....
Many people seem to be suspicious of pledging their allegiance for the barons committee to direct the rebellion and we need to have a little chat about this matter....clear a few misconceptions up I think.
Firstly, the barons committee invoked article 61 for the people to use. They have directed us to rebel by invoking it.
Secondly, the barons committee are in service to the sovereign people not the other way around, and they must act (as we all must) strictly according to constitutional law, they cannot deviate from the constitution with their direction. Most people don't seem to realize that the constitution provides the people with a system of justice, it enshrines our human rights we don't need the UN's or the EU's we have all we need within our own constitution. Why do you think they are attempting to destroy it and deny its existence even?
The fact that the barons are AWOL (some have passed on, others are to old or ill to be of service) does not matter at this stage. We should at least be grateful that they had the courage to invoke article 61 when they did. They were kicked out of the House of Lords for doing so and I wonder what else the regime threw at them 15 years ago?
The Magna Carta security clause (article 61) makes it a demand that the people stand under this most important tenet when it has been invoked, because that is the only remedy...mass disobedience. There is no other way to defeat institutionalised treason, a peaceful lawful rejection of the corrupt regime plus, the lobbying of the police to observe the evidential truth, and to stand with the people again is the best way to end this treason effectively, and peacefully. IT CAN AND MUST BE DONE. Without sovereignty there is ONLY slavery...and we haven't seen anything yet!
We can compel the surviving barons to convene grand juries under article 52 of Magna Carta 1215 when enough of us have woken up to the remedy here. It would be an act of treason to deny article 52 when the people cannot get remedy within the present judicial system.
All this remedy requires is MORE PEOPLE to join the rebellion.....why would any sane person or being bit stop supporting paedophiles, terrorists, war criminals, liars and thieves when the law demands it?
You don't need to send an Oath to one of the barons you just need to pledge allegiance to them directing it and get on with it yourself. The Oath serves as evidence of your lawful position and intent. You cannot be claimed to be an outlaw, with no protection of the law.
At the end of the day folk we have a solution to the occupation of our land by the EU and to get these traitors arrested and we need to unite to do this. Even if you don't entirely agree with the constitution and common law it is insane to run from the cure WE HAVE PROVEN WORKS! We are running out of time Agenda 21/ 20-30 and TTIP are upon us...the occupation of our land by the EU and destruction of our constitution is almost complete....only we the people standing together in open peaceful rebellion can stop the NWO tyranny in its tracks...that means YOU need to help, YES YOU!.
Once we have restored the system of service we are supposed to be enjoying, we will have much fewer taxes to pay, proper justice in the courts....only 4 laws to abide by and a lot more freedom. Truth will be heard on the MSM (instead of nothing but lies) We will NOT be at war with other sovereign nations....no fracking, geo-engineering, debt based currency, no propaganda in schools and no nanny state to tell you how to bring up your children etc.... .......things can change very quickly it just depends on whether you want to change it. We have no choice though, the alternative will be forced vaccinations, micro-chipping. more rules to strip us of our freedom, no private property and no dissent against the corruption without punishment. No access to the countryside (Agenda 21) absolute corporate fascism (TTIP)....so the choice is purely yours to make. Either defend the realm by using the constitution to protect it and us, or accept the NWO without complaint. Peace.

JANUARY 30 2016 Visiter No.626645 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 30 2016 Visiter No.626643 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 29 2016 Visiter No.626627 to www.opg.me
London Business office of our MP GORDON MARSDEN was telephoned and in a conversation with a NICK WRIGHT about who I was and that I confirmed the bad telephone line was because I was speaking from THAILAND and he then said oh yes is this the RIGHT of GRIEVANCE PETITION request to which I replied yes.
He then tried to divert me to the constituency office whom according to him were looking into it.
I said that over two weeks had past awaiting the official request response to which there had been none.
He said that this was because of the complexity they had not responded until they are fully aware of all the facts.
I said that he may be aware of that but they whom are supposedly dealing with it had left us completely in the dark, to which he said he would 'chase it up'.
Constituency Office
304 Highfield Road
Telephone Number: 01253 344143
Business Telephone Number: 0207 2191262

JANUARY 29 2016 Visiter No.626621 to www.opg.me
COURT of Protection MANAGER
29th Jan 2016 2nd request
Dear Joanne
I hope this email finds you well.
7 DAYS/ONE WEEK AGO ie 20.1.2016
I served upon the court previously the attached or linked below 2 documents;
Will you please confirm by return that both these JUDGES were indeed served with the above documents??
I also would like you to note from hereon in NOT to refer to me as MISTER/Mr as my name is mike or michael raymond: clarke.
This is by small case letters and not higher case any infringement is a breach of trademark & copyright of the ALL CAPS estate name that is indeed a legal fiction corporation entity copyrighted trademarked
mike: clarke

JANUARY 29 2016 Visiter No.626614 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 28 2016 Visiter No.626568 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 28 2016 Visiter No.626557 to www.opg.me
simple message - LEAVE the E.U.

JANUARY 27 2016 Visiter No.626540 to www.opg.me
COURT of Protection MANAGER
Dear Joanne
I hope this email finds you well.
7 DAYS/ONE WEEK AGO ie 20.1.2016
I served upon the court previously the attached or linked below 2 documents;
Will you please confirm by return that both these JUDGES were indeed served with the above documents??
I also would like you to note from hereon in NOT to refer to me as MISTER/Mr as my name is mike or michael raymond: clarke.
This is by small case letters and not higher case any infringement is a breach of trademark & copyright of the ALL CAPS estate name that is indeed a legal fiction corporation entity copyrighted trademarked
mike: clarke

JANUARY 27 2016 Visiter No.626534 to www.opg.me
Extra-Judicial Notice Issued to the Justices of THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
There is no provision upon land nor upon sea nor in the heavens allowing a corporation to declare war, declare martial law, operate as a crime syndicate, or interfere with the political standing of living people.
When what is true appears what is false must pass away.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has engaged in criminal acts and that it is at this moment shredding documents to avoid its culpability.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that the FBI has committed murder and false arrest of peaceful American state citizens in Oregon for protesting the unlawful and illegal acts of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and that it has stubbornly refused to recognize the political standing of its victims.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that the corporations you work for including the UN Corporation, the IMF, the UNITED STATES, the FEDERAL RESERVE ---which are international banks and their subsidiaries and subcontractors--- are operating as crime syndicates on our shores.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations have all been granted due process and have all merited their dissolution by their own continued acts of criminality and non-compliance and violation of their charters.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations have knowingly engaged in falsification of political status and probate records for their own enrichment.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations have knowingly operated public offices and allowed their employees to impersonate public officials for private gain.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations are now in the process to trying to avoid their culpability for these acts of violence and predation upon the people that they are under contract and obligation to serve.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations are now attacking Americans just as they attacked the people of India under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations are here on our soil in violation of their Treaties and Charters and that they have willfully committed war crimes upon the innocent and peaceful populace of the American states.
This is your private and inescapable Notice of the Matters of Fact before you.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Federal Postal District Judge Western Region

JANUARY 26 2016 Visiter No.626508 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 26 2016 Visiter No.626488 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 26 2016 Visiter No.626484 to www.opg.me

Once a FRAUD is revealed, ALL contracts, ALL documents, ALL actions resulting from the initial FRAUD are rendered NULL & VOID, Ab Initio, Nunc Pro Tunc, Ad Infinitum. FACT: There is NO Statute of Limitations on the CRIME of FRAUD!
REALITY CHECK TIME! !!! PAY ATTENTION !!! " If you are a PERSON....YOU ARE NOT A MAN. If you do not know what the 'Legal definition' of PERSON is YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT A MAN IS. Therefore, there is NO WAY that you can teach a BOY how to be a MAN. Learn the difference between a MAN and a PERSON first. Then work on yourself. The REAL problems out here are WAY deeper than many of you think. " ~Machette VanHelsing~ P.S. if you do not know etymology or the 'Legal definitions' of words, you READ, SPEAK, WRITE AND TYPE on a 5th grade reading level or lower. Oh yeah, don't be mad at ME for a a sovereign man, have merely shared TRUTH with you all and decided not to leave you in such a backward state of BOY/GIRLHOOD. Now that you know........ DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626478 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626475 to www.opg.me
Terry Barnet - This is the Royals, Paedophiles Mason Oath.
Of their Society and their systems and their way of life and customs, and then their Legislative Legal B.A.R. Association Law Society all fraud and fake.
These two are one and the same... as both work with each other.
Still want to go along with the Gestapo Legislative Legal as law ?
Fraudulently Administrating Admiralty Maritimes Legislative Legal Statutes Acts, laws of the sea, upon everyone whom lives upon the land.
There are Paedophiles Masons in all levels of public servants areas. and all are supporters of this Fraud, deceptive Policy's and regulations and so many are fooled into this by threats, and intimidation, harassment, violence, bullying, stolen, kidnapped, abducted and then held to ransom and even forced into a guilty box in their fraud courts when there is no Agreement, Contract, or Consent that was ever given or made, ever.

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626470 to www.opg.me
We highlight here what is going on. The JEWdiciary are facilitating a PROBATE RACKETEERING SCAM of huge gi-normous proportions where what they do from your birth is conceal, by denial/lack of full disclosure, that your birth is then registered as a DEATH certificate that states your birth? CONFUSED! By giving berth that was live your mother inadvertantly registered you, [like a car] not knowing that this transaction was actually giving you over as state property. By this little gem of 'act' under cestui que ve 1666 the FRAUD really starts to gather pace.
Your birthrights are over, you become a slave of the state. The certificate of birth becomes a tradeable bond which the state uses to enslave you all, committed, under admiralty maritime law society of the sea, WHICH has no place on our common law land.
SO acting in the capacity of a dead entity you become a ward of court/state where they can do as they please.
For example, shoe horning us into EUROPE as their chattels/slaves. The fact is, its a fraud by non-disclosure, your rights are there you just need to claim them. A legal fiction is a birth certificate, a corporation & its company name is your ALL CAPS NAME/Mr.

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626452 to www.opg.me

VIDEO here This follows Mr Steel refusing to be tried by magistrates at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court, insisting that it was his right to be judged by a jury of his peers.
He said he refused to pay his council tax because he believes that the UK’s elections at every level are controlled by a cartel of organised parties which prevent independent candidates, such as himself, from winning.
He added: “Complaints about such elitist crimes are either wholly suppressed or facetiously dismissed.”
During the hearing, Mr Steel produced a camera and tried to film the clerk and the magistrate but was told he was in breach of the law which forbids the filming of court hearings.
When the magistrate and clerk left the court to avoid being filmed, Mr Steel said he had dismissed his own case and also left the courtroom.
However, he then complained that decisions were being made in secret when the court reconvened to conclude the case in his absence.
He said that since no jury had ever convicted someone of recording a court case, he considered his filming of the hearing to be lawful.

JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626440 to www.opg.me


JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626435 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626420 to www.opg.me

OUR MP Gordon Marsden has been very difficult in getting him to act for us in what we obviously consider to be a very serious matter.

JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626413 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 23 2016 Visiter No.626393 to www.opg.me

as she gives me that LOOK of... I want me fag!!

JANUARY 23 2016 Visiter No.626389 to www.opg.me

Knowing what she was about to receive Angela wild refused service because she had already had it by email. TRACED-DELIVERED

served article 61 statement of MISPRISION OF TREASON

JANUARY 22 2016 Visiter No.626360 to www.opg.me

British justice system that you are not aware of - for whistleblowers!!

JANUARY 22 2016 Visiter No.626357 to www.opg.me


filed today @ 9am UK time + 3pm THAILAND time on 21.1.2016
by email and certified as recorded delivery
ref the ESTATES of
attached is EXECUTOR LETTERs
linked also by world wide web here below;

JANUARY 21 2016 Visiter No.626320 to www.opg.me
Dear Joanne EARLEY
Court of Protection MANAGER
21st January 2016
ref ann clarke 10370284
Yesterday I served the hereby attached, sibling reply statement requested by Mr Jackson.
The reply statement was also sent by recorded delivery to both siblings KEVIN CLARKE and ANGELA WILDs addresses by ROYAL MAIL recorded delivery.
This statement was also sent to the aforesaid siblings by their email addresses, current.
The statement was also sent to yourself and Mr Jackson clerk both by email.
With all due respect [having not sent it to you by royal mail recorded] can you now please just confirm by return 2 things;
1.That you have indeed received such a statement &
2.That you have now referred the entire matter back to Mr Jackson
The agonies being suffered in the 15 years of terror being used upon my mum and me needs addressing sooner rather than later.
As you are aware we have already suffered huge delays by the court which we believe, although apologised for, are deliberate.
I hope during the course of these events that subject to your innocence in this matter, you do not take any offence from my abrupt manner, as it certainly is not intended for any innocent beings.
mike: & ann: clarke

Dear Mr Clarke
Please see below email I sent earlier, I just want to confirm you received it as my email is playing up.
Joanne Earley

From: Earley, Joanne To: Sent: Thu Jan 21 12:40:38 2016 Subject: Re: CONFIRMATION required of STATEMENT reply received Dear Mr Clarke, 22.1.2016
I am writing to confirm that I have received your statement and referred it to Mr Justice Jackson.
Joanne Earley
"This Message has been sent from a Blackberry Device"

JANUARY 21 2016 Visiter No.626317 to www.opg.me
Responding to a message from a communicant, I sent the information below.
It may be useful to others, so I forward it now.
Attached are the 2 page letter from the Lord Chancellor's Office, which quotes the words from Hansard. Norman Scarth.
From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Recording in court. 'The law'. My experience. Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:00:56 +0000
RECORDING IN COURT: My understand of 'The Law', & my own experience, are as follow. It is actually Contempt of Court to take a recording device INTO A COURT BUILDING (without the permission of a judge) - so all those with a modern mobile phone are liable to two years in prison! It is also 'Contempt' to use a camera outside (i.e. in the precincts of) a court building.
From about 1997 I asked permission many times, both in my own civil actions & when acting as McKenzie Friend.
Sometimes permission was refused, sometimes it was granted, notably when I was before Lord Woolf (then Master of the Rolls), LJ Otton & LJ Ward in the Civil Appeal Court in 1999. Lord Woolf allowed me not one recorder, but two, having one of them on the bench before him, he pressing the buttons.
I later produced a transcript, in the same format as the official ones, & sent it to Lord Woolf for his signature that it was an accurate record. He made a couple of minor amendments & then he did sign it. I will find the document, scan it & send it to you.
There is also a record in Hansard of the Attorney General(?) saying in Parliament that there was no wish to prevent people using recorders, & that permission should be granted, unless there were good reasons for refusal. Will try to find that & send it, though looking up Hansard may find it for you.
Now to the civil action for Contempt against me in the High Court on 23/1/2013 (The AG v Norman Scarth). In his judgment, Lord Chief Justice Lord Igor judge (NO LESS!) said that if I had been there (I wasn't, having much belatedly accepted that Britain is not a safe place for people who tell the truth!) he would have allowed me to use a recorder, & would recommend that other judges should do so. You may be able to find that judgment in the official court reports, but I will try to find the relevant page & send it to you.
Of my arrest & imprisonment from the public gallery at Bradford Crown Court, as ordered by Judge Jonathan Lee Rose in 2011, judges & newspapers said that I had 'Showed contempt for the court': I didn't 'show' it - I declared it, loudly & clearly!
Norman Scarth.
PS: Prosecuted for the terrible 'crime' of offering leaflets, there were three hearings in Leeds Mags, & three in Manchester City Mags, at the last of which (23/5/2012) District Judge Jonathan Taaffe fined me £150, with £600 costs. But he also made a 'Restraining Order' that I must not mention Judge Rose's name anywhere.
By mentioning it above, I have now rendered myself liable to five years in prison if I set foot in Britain again!
All together now - -
etc. etc. etc. ."
See http:​//www.​bbc.​co.​uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-2​1845753
for PM Cameron expressing the gratitude of the nation.

JANUARY 20 2016 Visiter No.626298 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 20 2016 Visiter No.626294 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 20 2016 Visiter No.626285 to www.opg.me
My friend sent me this

JANUARY 19 2016 Visiter No.626248 to www.opg.me
On January 19, 2016 at 2:15 PM Earley, Joanne wrote:
Dear Mr Clarke,
Statements were received from both Mrs Angela Wilde and Mr Kevin Clarke on the evening of the 4th January 2016. On the 5th January 2016 the file was referred back to Mr Justice Jackson as outlined in his order of the 3rd November 2015. Once I receive an order from Mr Justice Jackson in this case a copy of it will be served on you at this email address.
Joanne Earley Operations Manager Court of Protection

From: mike rake.net [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 19 January 2016 09:10
To: Earley, Joanne
Dear Joanne
You are aware of course of FULL DISCLOSURE
Please forward by return both statements made by Angela & Kevin.
mike: clarke

Good afternoon Mr Clarke,
Please find attached a copy of the statements from Mrs Angela Wilde and Mr Kevin Clarke, also attached is an additional email that was sent by Mrs Angela Wilde.
Mr Justice Jackson has asked for your response in relation to the attached within 14 days, please note your response should be no longer than 6 pages.
Joanne Earley Operations Manager Court of Protection

Mr Kevin Anthony Clarke
6th January 2015
Re: In the matter of Ann Clarke, case number 10370284
Having read or should I say tried to read, comprehend and digest Michael's statement it only reinforces in my mind that mothers property in Blackpool should not be sold. This statement contains what I can only describe as ramblings on subjects that have no bearing on mums house. I actually fear for Michael's state of mental wellbeing. Should anything happen to him mother will have a home to return to.
There is absolutely no way my mother has written that statement let alone be able to understand the complex matters and details it goes into. I don't understand them myself. People can become institutionalised or radicalised and in my opinion my mother has become Michealized (no such word I know) but this is my feeling.
Selling that house would not be in her best interest but I am sure it will be Michaels. Maybe the proceeds would help him to buy the night club he has set his sights on. This would be of no benefit to our mother.
Yours sincerely, Kevin Clarke

From: Angie Wild Sent: 05 January 2016 21:01
To: Earley, Joanne Subject: Ann Clarke
Case number 10370284
I ANGELA WILD want to let it be known I am totally against the sale of my mothers house, if the house has to be sold I want the money's to be put back in the court of protection.
1. My mother is living out of the country as Micheal Clarke is on the run from the police because he has a prison sentence awaiting him.
2. Micheal has stated on social networking sites he intends to purchase a nightclub abroad with the money's.
3. Micheal has many failed business ventures and I don't want my mothers money going the same way.
4. My mother needs a house to come back to in the event of Michaels demise.
5. Micheal has posted home made videos on his web page asking the queen directly to let them back in the country without sending him to prison. This is not the actions of a stable man.
Yours faithfully Angela wild

From: Angie Wild Sent: 08 January 2016 08:52
To: Earley, Joanne Subject: Ann Clarke
I Angela wild and Kevin Clarke would like to request authorisation to gain access, to look after our mums house while she is out of the country as we believe it is being left unattended with a friend of Michaels having the keys and trying to sell it, a said Steve power.
Regards Angela wild and Kevin Clarke

JANUARY 19 2016 Visiter No.626226 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626205 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626199 to www.opg.me

here in pdf
Mike Clarke love both these items.. the video and the pdf..
PEN will WIN over the sword or GUN!
& the 1sr BAIL to burn will be THE JEWdiciary

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626195 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626180 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626176 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 17 2016 Visiter No.626163 to www.opg.me

A serving policeman who allegedly approached one of Northern Ireland’s most senior judges and threatened to arrest him is to go on trial for contempt of court.
Dressed in full uniform as he attended the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast again today, Thomas Anthony Carlin declined to apologise for his actions at an earlier hearing.
He also rejected an offer of legal representation and asked to have a jury decide on his behaviour towards Lord Justice Gillen. But another judge refused his request, instead listing the case to be heard by him next week.
Mr Justice Horner said: “I’m going to arrange for a trial to take place on this issue of whether or not there has been contempt in the face of the court. I will hear it, there will not be a jury.”
He also warned the policeman that, if found guilty, he could be fined or sent to prison. Mr Carlin’s alleged outburst came at the end of a ruling in a house repossession case in the High Court on Tuesday.
The 43-year-old had been representing himself in the legal battle with Santander bank over a property in Co Antrim. At the end of the hearing he allegedly got up and moved towards the bench, claiming he was going to arrest Lord Justice Gillen.
Security and court staff intervened before he was led from the courtroom. He was arrested on suspicion of two counts of common assault, but subsequently released without charge. The Police Ombudsman was also notified.
Mr Carlin is alleged to have interrupted proceedings without justification, refused to resume his seat, approached the presiding judge, threatened to arrest him without lawful excuse and physically interfered with a court tipstaff. He had been given until today to secure a lawyer, apologise and provide an explanation for his behaviour.
But shortly after entering the courtroom again today in PSNI uniform and hat, Mr Carlin made his position clear. He told Mr Justice Horner: “I believe for me to apologise to the court would be abandoning my defence.”
The offer of legal assistance from a law firm which deals with the Police Federation was also turned down.
Mr Carlin further claimed: “I acted in my capacity as a police officer, I believed a crime had been committed (and) it was outrageous in nature. I believe the tipstaff and court staff who intervened... obstructed me in the execution of my duty.”
At one stage Mr Justice Horner asked if he denied the alleged behaviour set out in writing. The officer replied: “I completely dispute those facts.”
The judge then cautioned him: “You realise that should you be found guilty of contempt in the face of the court you will be liable for a number of penalties including imprisonment.”
Mr Carlin responded that he would comply with the findings of a jury. However, he was told to turn up on Monday for a trial to be decided by Mr Justice Horner alone.

JANUARY 17 2016 Visiter No.626160 to www.opg.me

Britain’s most senior judge, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, wrote last week that “our justice system has become unaffordable to most”.
It’s a remarkable statement for the lord chief justice to make. But unfortunately it’s right. In Britain, in the 21st century, a growing number of people can’t afford to defend themselves and make sure their rights are respected. The facts are startling. In 2009-10, more than 470,000 people received advice or assistance for social welfare issues. By 2013-14, the year after the government’s reforms to legal aid came into force, that number had fallen to less than 53,000 – a drop of nearly 90%.
At the same time, tribunal fees have been introduced and court fees increased, time and again. Advice centres – which provide straightforward guidance on legal problems – have closed across the country. And the “exceptional funding scheme” – the government’s “safety net” for the most vulnerable – has helped a mere eight children since it was created.

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626136 to www.opg.me

How to Sue a Judge Without Using a Lawyer here
The subject is PERSONAGE & BARRATY here
An exercise in the black art of legalese? Or…Why it does matter!

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626134 to www.opg.me
ANNA VON REITZ new statement
Important Details for Everyone
Regarding 12 USC 95a and 95 (2) b:
Americans don't have a "nation" -- we have a country. The term "American National" does not apply to us, either. That is the Federal verbiage for American Samoans, Puerto Ricans, etc.
The "nation" you would be giving your estate to via reversionary trust interest is the Federal United States, not the Continental United States. That is, you would be "donating" your private property to the crooks who defrauded you and your parents and your grandparents in exchange for more of their worthless promissory notes and bunko.
Regarding the Status of the Western States:
Red-line the fact that the Continental Congress (land)is entirely different and separate from the United States Congress (sea). Until you clearly, absolutely grasp this separation of jurisdictions you will be deluded about who "they" are and who "we" are.
They are British Subjects "residing" on our soil. They are supposed to be here loyally providing us with "good faith service" and "essential governmental services" which we are owed. They have instead deliberately and with malice aforethought entrapped (press-ganged) and mischaracterized us as British Crown Subjects, that is, as "debt slaves" in their scheme of things, and have proceeded to rape and plunder the ":public trusts" they established "in our names" without our knowledge or consent. These are venal criminal acts and war crimes.
To date, despite promises to rectify the situation no actual remedy has been received. Under commercial law, when no remedy exists, the aggrieved party is entitled to settle the matter according to their devises so long as it is equitable. We are calling for the return of all our property, the assets we are owed, plus reasonable interest for their use, and damages for their abuse.
Regarding Attempts to Mischaracterize Us and Avoid Paying Us as The Heirs of the Priority Creditors:
We can't let the rats get away with it, and won't. Write to the Members of Congress so that they are fully convinced of their culpability in this matter. We are owed the return of the gold that was stolen -- "confiscated" from our grandparents and the return of our equity exchanged in good faith for their worthless dishonored promissory notes. The entirety of the scheme and those responsible for it must be addressed and the machinery backing it dismantled so that no additional fraudulent claims can be generated.
This means recording our nativity, not registering a "birth". It means administration under the Law of the Land, not the Law of the Sea. It means recognition of the fact that we, not the middlemen banks, are their employers and benefactors and priority creditors.
Regarding the "Global Debt Facility"
The "Global Debt Facility" if you haven't figured it out by now, is a swindle. There's a reason you haven't heard of it before--- it's because it was just a "box" for the bankers to deposit all the ill-gotten loot they've recieved, when and if their receipt of stolen goods was ever discovered. Well, guess what? The stolen nature of the booty has been discovered and those guilty of the theft are scurrying around making deposits so that it won't technically be in their possession when the gate closes and we are all looking around for the thieves.
The World Bank and IBRD and Federal Reserve were all Secondary Creditors in the 1933 Bankruptcy (See "Federal" Title 5) When the dust finally settled and the Priority Creditors--- the American People---had finally paid off all the debts owed by a private, for-profit governemental services corporation doing business as the "United States of America, Inc." these same Secondary Creditors pretended that they didn't know who the Priority Creditors and their Heirs were. They "presumed" that we just "abandoned" the funds and assets and claimed it all for themselves.
Stealing our remaining gold left as an inheritance owed as a result of FDR's confiscations and refusing to repay gold and silver that they received in exchange for fraudulent "debt notes" known as "Federal Reserve Notes" is part and parcel of their attempt to undermine the lawful Republican Government owed to the people of the Continental United States.
Remember HJR 192 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934?
The vermin in Congress established a "dollar for dollar" fixed exchange rate --- one of their promissory notes (I.O.U's) in exchange for one ounce of our silver or a commensurate amount of our gold. Thus they emptied out Fort Knox through the back door, then declared "bankruptcy" of the corporation responsible and left us to stand as "sureties" to pay the debts of their bankrupted corporation on top of robbing us blind.
Not only that, they brought their filthy paws to their buddies in the Bar Association and the administrators of the Holy See and these entities gave them bankruptcy protection, which means they "erred" fantastically and are responsible for the injustice and mistreatment of the American People and their National Trust which they are all obligated under the actual Constitution and the Treaty of Westminster 1794 to protect.
No amount of "pretending" that we don't exist or that we ever voluntarily and knowingly changed our political status to accommodate their predation will work. It simply isn't true and no prudent man would agree to the "contracts" that they pretend were accepted by 390 million prudent men.
So there you go--- all you are seeing via Ms. Hudes is a bunch of crooks trying to find a way out of a major league jam they created.
It's time to drag out the public records and begin the forensic audits and liquidations of the banks and other organizations responsible, or, for the banks and those other organization colluding with the banks to come clean and return the equitable remedy demanded:
1. All our gold returned to the American people and the American Government it is owed to, plus interest;
2. All title and patent to the land that the American people and the American Government is owed, free of lien, encumbrance, or debt of any kind amassed by merely "presumed" Secondary Beneficiaries;
3. Immediate cessation and permanent Estoppel of all fraudulent claims of mortgages or other claims of debt based on the debts of these same "presumed" Secondary Beneficiaries;
4. Return of all equity interest owed to us that has been fraudulently claimed to be "abandoned" funds;
5. Reinstatement of lawful money and private banking without further unlawful conversion or delay.
6. Return of all interest in private property without except to the lawful living people to whom it is owed despite any undisclosed process of "application" or "registration"---- including interest in public resources, businesses, homes, infrastructure, copyrights, patents, and favorable liens.

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626122 to www.opg.me
Mum looking alot brighter after her fall on the morning of the 12th January, 4 days ago that left her having to have 12 stitches in her forhead at the hospital.. poor soul.. it was horrible but thankfully she is recovering.. we have had to change her sleeping arrangements to safeguard against that ever happening again. We have informed the court of how urgent it is to sell mums house to reinstate better care for her here but the court have delayed this application now 6 months in the face of being ordered from me as current Living Will executor to remove the restriction off the land registry.

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626119 to www.opg.me
Everything stated in this post is alleged only.
Peter's trial has been put back AGAIN to July 2016 - because his new "barrister" has not had the time to prepare for the case, while the new solicitors had not got it trial ready despite having months to do so. [outrageous!]. Requests for a bail application continue to be refused. [Why?].
Peter has no idea where his mother Barbara is and no idea how she is because no one will tell him!! Cards / letters wishing this elderly and much persucuted 87 yr-old lady can be sent to her via:
Mrs Barbara Hofschroer, c/o Adult Social Care Team, West Offices, Station Rise, YORK YO1 6GA. It is said she was supposed to be being moved to a "specialist unit", but no one knows, apart from the council etc., if this has happened.
Please write to her at that address and let her know she is not alone. Her abusers have much to answer for. We are told she is now bedridden and permanently crippled due to "falls" at a "care home" she was in. Serious surgery followed on a broken leg. She also contracted pneumonia recently [a "chest ailment"]. Needless to say we have a list of commendations regarding her care whilst she was with P and in his care. It is a public scandal what has happened to her, since leaving P's care, and even since Lord Maginnis's protest in parliament in 2012, which was completely ignored by all authorities. Lord Maginnis has been updated more than once but declines to now acknowledge this case in any way.
Pls. see the comments below re: Maginnis.
A deal was offered to P whereby if he pled "guilty" he would be released. Peter declined - it will take more than keeping him in jail to shut him up, it is said.
Due to P's move to HMP Holme House, due to the [postponed] trial, communications are disrupted getting to him. His address is now, but unknown for how much longer, is: P. Hofschroer, A3324DJ, 3-A-1-11, HMP Holme House, Holme House Rd., Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 2QU.
Peter thanks his supporters for their continuing support.
The main site is www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com .

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626118 to www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
Why Unrest of Any Kind Defeats Both Versions of America
There has been a lot of inappropriate talk about "civil war" in America. Let's be perfectly blunt.
The Federal United States has been operated as a puppet by the British Government which in turn has been operated as a puppet by the City State of Westminster aka Inner City of London which has been operated by international banking cartels and the Bar for generations. In turn, these organizations have been influenced, led, and perpetuated by what Frank O'Collins calls "the Roman Cult" within the Roman Catholic Church.
Americans, like the British People, have gone along trustingly and been abused and enslaved.
We, Americans, have been used repeatedly as the "muscle" behind wars for profit and illegal and immoral police actions in other countries undertaken by the British Crown Corporation and its cronies throughout the world, with the result that we are widely blamed and despised as the perpetrators of all this greed and violence when in fact we have been victims like everyone else and have merely been more gullible than the rest of the world.
A careful reading of the historical documents, especially the treaties ending the Revolutionary War and The Constitution, reveals that the British retained control of a substantial portion of the American jurisdiction of the sea including our ability to conclude international treaties and commercial trade agreements---both of which have been crippled and controlled since the birth of our nation by this arrangement.
In exchange for our Forefather's agreement to this deplorably bad deal, the British Monarch was made our Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. It was thought that his clear obligation to the Americans in this capacity would bind his hands and prevent him from doing us harm. In 1794 a treaty between the Americans and the City State of Westminster was also concluded in which we were promised "perpetual" friendship and amity.
We definitely need to remind them of the meaning of "perpetual".
So here we are at the beginning of the twenty-first century and our Trustees have proven to be our worst enemies--- not only our worst enemies, but worst enemies of all freedom-loving and decent people everywhere. Since 1866 the British Government has privately promoted and perpetuated a policy of eternal war and enslavement of the world's population while keeping up an appearance of being the bulwark and defender of western civilization. Like a pedophile acting as a Foster Parent, the British Government has spared no expense in its efforts to cover up its dirty work, but it is at last discovered.
The Federal United States is and has always been an instrumentality of the British Government and the international banks and the Bar Associations and it is the Federal United States---not the Continental United States--- which has been guilty of all the crimes against humanity which have been racked up and placed at the door of the hapless Americans who have been deceived into believing that the Federal United States is or ever was their lawful government.
Time to wake up. We have been hosts for these parasites and now they are moving on to attempt to parasitize China and its vast population.
The so-called "Federal Government" is a foreign corporation under contract to provide our States with nineteen enumerated services directed by our Trustee the British Monarch and his corporate Executive Officer known as the "President of the United States". The British Monarch was paid for this "service" with tribute in the form of mineral wealth extracted from the American States and was faithfully paid for involving us in an endless stream of unjust police actions and dirty commercial deals and then handing us the blame and the bills.
Let it stand before the American People and the entire world who the guilty parties actually are: the administration of Queen Elizabeth II, her corporation, ELIZABETH II, the British Crown Corporation and its franchises worldwide, the Lords of the Admiralty and the City-State of Westminister together with all its Successor Organizations and franchises, and the Holy See doing business as FRANCISCUS are directly and personally responsible for all this injustice and mayhem and mis-administration of the Public Trust in Britain, America, the Commonwealth, India, Japan, all of Western Europe and most of Eastern Europe, too.
The populations of all these countries have a grudge and many, many claims against these perpetrators; the People of China would be well-warned and advised not to accept any "gifts" from Jacob Rothshild or the World Bank or QEII, either. Gold and silver are not food, not fuel, and not the raw resources that China needs. Apart from being excellent conductors of electricity and photo emulsions, of what use are these so-called "precious" commodities?
Time to wake up.
We have all been bamboozled by these phonies (as in Phoenicians) long enough.
The bankers and lawyers who have acted as the foot soldiers of this global Evil Empire have planned various scenarios for the demise of America. First of all, we are to be blamed for all their sins. Second of all, we are to be charged with all their crimes. Third, we are to be stripped of whatever wealth we still have after they have stolen as much as they can possibly steal to pay their debts.
From their standpoint, it would be expedient to foment a civil war on our soil. There are a number of reasons.
First, it kills off their lawful Creditors, the American People. They are now claiming in the United Nations that we no longer exist and that the heirs of their Creditors are "absent" or "unknown". This pathetic excuse is being offered as a means of avoiding paying back the American People for gold illegally confiscated in the 1930's and labor and resources exchanged for no payment but hot air and paper ever since.
Second, murder of the American People allows them to collect on life insurance policies that they have gratuitously established on each and every one of us, naming themselves and their corporations as the beneficiaries.
Third, murder of the American People leaves an opportunity for them and their buddies to claim the "abandoned property" just as they did in Germany after the War.
They call this "plowing the field"---- emptying the land of its people and decrepit buildings and infrastructure so that it can be rebuilt under new ownership: theirs.
However, they have to have a plausible reason for attacking the American People, because after all they are under public contract to protect us and are continuing to siphon off large payments from our public treasuries for the service. They therefore have to find some sneaky, backdoor means to excuse their actions --- and their continuing crimes against us.
It is time to recognize these criminals for who and what they are and to bring a stop to them and their predations upon the entire world. The most expedient way to do this is for everyone worldwide to cease operating as any form of corporation---simply dissolve them all, nationalize their assets in the case of "government" corporations, demand that the Pope acting as CEO liquidate those corporations that have acted as criminal syndicates----including the major banks. Apply the Icelandic Answer.
Everyone please note that although these vermin have been misrepresenting the American People to the rest of the world for the past 150 years and mischaracterizing us at home, they are NOT the American People owed the land jurisdiction of the United States and never have been. The mis-administration and usurpation of our government that has been accomplished via semantic deceit and other forms of fraud, but that, too, has been discovered and is at an end.
If those responsible for this egregious behavior have any hope of surviving themselves, they must make amends to the rest of the planet and the people they have harmed.
In the case of the Federal United States the turning of the worm leaves one thing very clear: any attacks against the unarmed and peaceful American People to whom they owe "good faith service" will be instantly recognized as crimes of war and aggression by commercial mercenaries disguised as units of government.
Any failure to correct the political status of Americans to reflect their actual political status as "free sovereign and independent people of the United States" --- that is, the Continental United States--- like any attempt to mischaracterize their Creditors and the Heirs of their Creditors will also be recognized for what it is and rebutted.
Any failure of the British Monarch and the "President of the United States" to repay all the debt of the Federal United States that is lawfully owed to the innocent American People of the Continental United States will be obvious self-interest and default upon debt in the full view of all other nations.
When all those other peoples and nations have been afforded a full view of what has gone on here and stop to consider how they, too, have been abused, lied about, defrauded, and enslaved by these Babylonian Snake Oil Salesmen in tweeds, they will conclude as we have that we have all suffered from a single malady which has its world headquarters in the Inner City of London. And then we can all take appropriate action---like enforcement of the $279 trillion dollar International Commercial Obligation Lien which the Americans have placed against the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association and the misnamed Department of Justice which matures tomorrow.
The people of the Earth must unite against the evils perpetuated by the inhabitants of "the World"---a fake, illusory Satanic construct incorporated legal fictions--- that is, lies--- which serves only to mask the identities and obscure the filthy and violent intentions of profoundly evil men masquerading as philanthropists and pillars of the global community instead.
To all men and women everywhere the alarm goes forth and the claim in equity is clearly stated. This is our Earth. It belongs to us, not to any corporation. This, the American Government, as opposed to the "US Government" is a lawful and peaceful government "of the people, by the people and for the people"---- not a government "of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation".
If we, the people of the Continental United States are forced to take up arms against those operating the Federal United States, it will be a clarion call for your joint understanding and assistance in removing this source of criminality from our mutual midst. Let the Federal United States and the Governments of Britain and the City-State of Westminster and the administration of the Vatican stand revealed as crime syndicates that have created and which are responsible for much of the poverty, misery, injustice, and conflict that have infested our planet for generations----and not as they would portray themselves as enlightened philanthropists.
Petty crooks operating on a giant stage is much closer to the truth of it.
As each person reads this and knows that we can choose global peace or global war and that it is not negotiable that innocent victims should again bear the brunt of this criminality, don't be afraid just because you are suddenlyaware that you are "just one person" in the midst of a universe. Become aware instead that you are the universe.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Alaska State Superior Court

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626088 to www.opg.me

A Court Application made 6 months ago on the 31st July 2015 here of 200 pages condensed by request to 6 pages (here) to remove the restriction placed on the land registry has still not been completed ... full title here.
My mothers assets, having had theft, fraud & maladministration inflicted upon them by the OPG and then, further persecution into exile from the UK STATE Terrorism, she just wants to sell her home to live in peace from the UK government via bent judiciary that continue to steal her assets claiming her incapacity, when she HAS capacity, and if in any doubt carries her living will - EXECUTOR that is now invoked that secures her future but still the MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE carries on unabated.
Mum, disabled and 75 has suffered tremendously by the COURTs actions causing HARM, LOSS & INJURY with TRESPASS being also committed upon her property and her human rights that requires RESTORATION. IT really beggars belief what these people are getting away with alongside a catalogue of other victims taboo that we are aware of & may GOD help those we are unaware of.
Intentionally the courts are providing a slow and uncomfortable death for mum by denying her what is clearly HERS and not theirs, nor anyone else's. THE money awarded was for her care and comfort NOT for FAT CAT LAWYERS JUDGES and other huge fees to prove her capacity. IT really is a complete disgusting mess to read what these people are capable of in this day and age. I fear for my own old age as I do for others if things are allowed to continue as they do.. what a way to end your retirement days fighting to get restoration of your own assets property money and human rights.. this country of the UNITED KINGDOM is a joke and this is not a one man band campaign, there are thousands.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626085 to www.opg.me

With Uk Column Brian Gerrish Guy Taylor and JOHN HURST.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626083 to www.opg.me
Leonard Lawrence Pilot - COP CASE & THE

COURT ORDER Mr Justice Adrian Fulford, Queens Bench Division.
Leonard Lawrence not to disclosed to any judge details of the abuse he suffered whilst under the guardianship of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.

Lord Justice Adrian Fulford
High Court judge and the child sex ring: Adviser to Queen was founder of paedophile support group to keep offenders out of jail
Lord Justice Fulford was named last year as an adviser to the Queen
He was a key backer of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange
Police suspect the group of abusing children on an 'industrial scale'
He is revealed as a founder member of campaign to defend PIE
At the time it was calling for the age of consent to be lowered to just four
By Martin Beckford for The Mail on Sunday
Published: 22:02, 8 March 2014 | Updated: 16:52, 22 January 2015
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/…/High-court-judge-child-sex-rin…
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
The report exonerating Lord Justice Fulford should be published Joshua Rozenberg
Why shouldn't that be published? Why should we have to rely on a summary? Why are we not told what Fulford said in response to the allegations against him?
To protect Fulford's privacy? To spare his blushes? Where they regard it as necessary, judges invade people's personal privacy in their published rulings every day of the week. It's called open justice.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626081 to www.opg.me
Ode to Sheriff Mack -- How to Get Enforcement of the Law of the Land?
People all over this country are complaining about "lack of enforcement" of the basic Organic and Public Laws. I hate to break it to you, but you all have to take action in your own behalf to provide enforcement. You are "self-governing"--- remember?
The rats--- for profit governmental services corporations run by banks-- have usurped upon your lawful jurisdiction and set up incorporated "Counties" and incorporated "States". As soon as you incorporate anything, it is removed from the jurisdiction of the land and taken out from under the Law of the Land (including the Constitution) and moved to the international jurisdiction of the sea and the Law of the Sea.
As a result, you no longer have Sheriffs operating under the Law of the Land and you no longer have enforcement of the Organic and Public Laws. What you have are men in "similarly named" private corporate offices---Mall Cops and commercial mercenaries-- who are charged with enforcement of "codes, regulations, and statutes" that apply only to the franchises and employees and officers of their respective (and often different) corporations.
Throughout much of America, nobody is being paid to mind the store or provide enforcement of the Organic and Public Laws anymore. So, now does it make sense why you have no access to the guarantees of The Constitution and no enforcement for the indictments of Common Law Grand Juries?
To get action and enforcement you have to have a Common Law Sheriff operating the land jurisdiction of your county, and you also need an entire Common Law Court backing him up.
There are basically three possibilities---
1. Cause enough ruckus so your county votes to dissolve the "County" corporation and operate in its correct jurisdiction---- this is unlikely because they will want to cling to the "federal funding" --- i.e., kick-backs from the fraud.
2. Convince the "Sheriff" of Your County as in "Sheriff of Jackson County" to also accept the duty of Jackson County Sheriff (the Sheriff on the Land position) and also enforce the Organic and Public Laws ---- wear both the "incorporated" and the "unincorporated" hats. That has been done and it has been proven to be correct by the Mack/Printz v. USA case in the US Supreme Court. It used to be taken for granted that the Sheriff occupied both the private corporate "law enforcement" office and the Public Office, but nowadays they are too bedraggled and dumbed-down to know the difference, and since the incorporated "Counties" want a free wheel to plunder and do what they like, far too many "Sheriffs" have gone along and taken orders and failed to serve the Public Office or enforce the Organic and Public Law.
Sheriff Richard Mack and Joe Arpaio are examples of men who have honorably worn both hats.
3. Do an end-run around the incorporated County. Just write them off as foreign "code enforcers" who are there to police foreign corporations and Federal United States Citizens and make sure that is all they do, too. Meantime, marshal up the living people of your county via a Public Notice of a Public Meeting to form an unincorporated body politic---- a free association of landowners---- sign and witness your Declaration of Political Status reclaiming your birthright estate and political status established on the land jurisdiction of your native state--- and begin educating people. Explain that our hired help--- the "federal corporation" and its employees--- defrauded us back in 1933 and that a second such corporation is now attempting to do the same thing. Explain that as a result of this chicanery their political status as been changed to that of a British Crown Subject and that the Public Offices their county is owed have all been converted to private corporate offices instead---- leaving the Public Offices vacated since 1976. As a result we have no real Sheriff operating the land jurisdiction of the County and enforcing the Organic and Public Laws--- The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Incorporation, The Constitution for the united States of America, The Northwest Ordinance, and United States Statutes-at-Large. They have to elect from among themselves a whole different slate of candidates to fill the actual Public Offices. Once those people are elected, bonded, and sworn in, your Sheriff will have a complete American Common Law Court to back him up and he will have the sweeping enforcement powers he is owed as the top peacekeeping officer of the land. He will be able to deputize as many men as he needs to enforce the Organic and Public Law--- just like John Wayne in the old movies.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626072 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626060 to www.opg.me
READ about it here
Seems to me Jones and Lush have defrauded heirs under the intestacy rules

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626055 to www.opg.me

This is why there is clear evidence to show that in the COURT OF PROTECTION there is an obvious denial/refusal of funds issued to patients to get representation or to investigate their own victomisation from these CRIMINALS, in which we have had the same experiences SHOWING without doubt a CONFLICT of INTEREST for the BAR to be involved in the PROBATE MIS-MANAGEMENT of a persons estate who is ALIVE.
TO the trained eye of course, this is all too obvious, THIS IS how the CRIME works so well for the COP/OPG. NO ACCOUNTABILITY???
AND the justice system wonders WHY there is an increase in COMMERCIAL LIENS??
TAKE AWAY justice from the MASSES and you are inviting a WAR!

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626053 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626051 to www.opg.me
31 pages in total to Hogan Howe they were signed for by his office yesterday by Terry at 8-19am on the 12th January 2016. I included copies of emails to Hogan Howe in which he was requested to arrest Conmeran-Osbourn-Burley and others.
He has signed yet again for documents of proof that can't be argued against, i have stated and named several judges who i believe were ordered to get rid of my cases against a certain bank.
I have shown him by documentation i have that he deliberately destroyed evidence signed for by his office in 2009. City of Westinster Magistrates court blatantly refuse to reply to letters sent to its court manager and staff asking why my case was given no court reference number neither was it given a case number. On my phoning this court i was informed "NO JUDGMENT RECORDED OF DJ WICKHAM AND YOUR REQUEST FOR ARREST WARRANTS TO BE SERVED ON CEOs OF THE BRADFORD AND BINGLEY BANK, ITS HEAD OF LEGAL SERVICES P. JORDAN, CHIEF CONSTABLES SIMS AND SWIFT, LASTLY ALISTAIR DARLING EX MINISTER".
Liz Homer ex CEO of HM Customs failed to respond to documents she was sent re mass fraud. I see she waited until she received her title and has now resigned.
Hogan-Howe has received letters and documents that i sent and received from MPs.
Now we go after the CPS again for their false letters to me, yet another CEO Sharmer of the CPS knighted and resigned from the CPS.
9 days passed and no acknowledgment from Carney CEO of the Bank of England. I'm told Conmeran is in a flap.
Personally they should jail every one of these scum and throw away the keys. Cameron has aided and abetted the Bradford and Bingley to blatantly steal from its borrowers. BASTARDS ALL.
Get snouts out the trough party. At least we do tell the truth.

JANUARY 13 2016 Visiter No.626030 to www.opg.me

Dear MP Gordon Marsden
I frequently catch up on the marvellous work that you do.
HOWEVER, I have asked repeatedly about a RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION.
Can you please respond.
CONSIDERING you are of the same cloth ie 'GAY'
Something that we do have in common, one might expect a little more sympathy to our cause.
Also, the fact that my disabled mum of 75 years is having to endure such trauma regarding the resulting losses to her estate from the ongoing Court of Protection state mal administration, theft ,fraud and NOW persecution into exile, appears too, to have little effect on the effort being put into a resolution.
You once warned against criticising the Judiciary for corruption and if you are aware of such dangers you clearly know more and what they are capable of, to get away with.
The information I am gleaning from it, is that you too, fear that not conforming with the WILL of the judiciary, may also have an adverse effect on your own career.
Remember that your duty is to your constituents, not to corrupt entities, obviously running rife in our courts system.
Being duty bound, a public servant, I am clearly CALLING on those services with some URGENCY and further to this, the failing of which will be documented with our other allegations of MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE that are being collated on various PUBLIC SERVANTS, misconducts that in your case I still have on file of emails being ignored etc
It is now, where we need you to stand out and sit clearly on one side of the fence or the other?
So help me GOD, those whom are doing the LATTER I will expose.
Your competitor in the election PETER ANTHONY of the conservatives is a very close friend of mine of many many years and it is because of that friendship I really did wish him to win such is the desperation we find ourselves in with regard to help needed that am sure PETER would have assisted in the full capacity.
PIN your colours to the mast please MR MARSDEN because I now need to see them!!
Mike & Ann: Clarke
recorded delivery receipt attached 11/1/2016 LABOUR HEAD OFFICE

JANUARY 12 2016 Visiter No.626011 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 12 2016 Visiter No.626010 to www.opg.me
Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia

JANUARY 12 2016 Visiter No.626007 to www.opg.me

JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625980 to www.opg.me


JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625966 to www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs
Part 3 of Third Round with Karen Hudes
Ms. Hudes Has Also Been Putting Out Attack Pieces on the Internet--- Apparently Hoping That She Will Get Somewhere With Gossip She Can’t Go With Facts. Below is an example of the Hate Mail, with my response below:
KAREN: To: J W I have been warning people that Anna von Reitz is a disinformation agent for quite some time. As I stated a year ago, when discussing secret societies, "Anna Von Reitz is controlled opposition and works for the Vatican. Most of the people with good websites do. They are gathering information about who is most aware." https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter4.17.15.pdf
ANNA: Anyone who needs to know can ask and find out that I don’t own, operate, or have any kind of role whatsoever with any website except www.annavonreitz.com which is a simple numbered list of articles and blurbs and its donated by a fan who gets no money for what he is doing ----just like me.
That’s right, Karen. I get no salary from the Vatican and in fact have nothing to do with the Vatican. I agreed to help Pope Benedict XVI return American assets to the American People. But that’s not a job with the Vatican, nor with the Holy See. It’s not a job in the sense that you have a job with the World Bank or the “Global Debt Facility”. It’s a mission---one that I began a long, long time ago.
KAREN: With this I see that von Reitz is still evidently trying to unilaterally surrender US military might through a crash of the Federal Reserve Note, and turn US gold back to the Vatican https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.6.16.1.pdf General Dunford and the Joint Chiefs of Staff had nothing to say about my letter to General Dunford https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.3.16.pdf or the fact that the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF is restoring the US monetary gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility to US residents through minting the gold into the US Dollar https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.6.16.1.pdf 2 and that the Board of Governors has declared the United States to be in interregnum so that we can implement the Global Currency Reset. @KarenHudes 11h11 hours ago The Global Currency Reset is under implementation. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.8.16.2.pdf Here is what my followers have to say: "Anna has very close ties to the Vatican, and that is a power base I do not have much trust in. " https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.7.16.1.pdf
ANNA: The United States you are talking about has no “military might” and never did have. Know why, Karen? Because the “United States, Inc.” is just a stinking corporation-- a name on a piece of paper, an implement of fraud, a Ponzi Scheme, a nasty, globe-sprawling criminal cartel that has done nothing but victimize and terrorize and plunder the American people and give us an undeserved bad name worldwide.
The military might of America comes from the people of America. Take the American Armed Forces away from the control of the bankrupted “United States, Inc.” and from any presumption that we are associated with those crooks, and the Truth emerges. The military might of the Federal United States is limited to the Puerto Rican Navy, the Home Guard on Guam, and similar meaninglessly small forces. That is the reality.
Our military might comes from the united States of America, the actual one. I know that might be hard for you to grasp, Karen, but it is guns and fists--- and those guns and fists have been used by a sick, rotten, corrupt corporate syndicate and its “leadership” to engage in wars for profit, racketeering, pollution of the environment, terrorizing and murdering civilians, and doing it all “in our names” while at the same time feeding us lies to make us go along with it. br> And we aren’t going along with it anymore.
Our military might doesn’t depend on us enslaving ourselves to a piece of paper or allowing crooks to steal our identity and charge up our credit to the moon or giving them a fixed rate of exchange that allows them to trade their worthless I.O.U.’s for our labor and resources. No, Karen, it doesn’t. Once you realize that the bankruptcy of the Federal Reserve doesn’t have a thing to do with us, and that we have the only actual money in the entire system, you can see that we are more than capable of repudiating their odious debt and their false claims that we are standing as their sureties. And going right straight on down the track using United States Silver Dollars.
We don’t need you or the “World Bank” or the “IBRD” or any of the central banks. Soon a worldwide currency backed simply by all the labor and all the natural resources of the world will be available and delivered via Block Chain technology. We will finally have absolutely no need for bankers whatsoever. They will have to find other ways to steal. The lawyers will no longer be in demand, either.
This Great Fraud has been the final straw.
KAREN: What Von Reizinger doesn't seem to realize is that WE HAVE OUTED THE DISINFO AGENTS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE CURRENCY SCAM. The real heroes in Harney County are the Hammonds, and they want nothing to do with the dupes and provocateurs. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.3.16.1.pdf
ANNA: The Hammonds are trying to save the lives of innocent men. Pure and simple, they realize that life means more than money---- something that you and the World Bankers need to learn, too. So they are willing to give up and sacrifice themselves and the land they love to save the lives of others. It’s truly heroic on their parts, however misguided, because the Evil that threatens them also threatens the rest of us, and if we keep on letting cretins like you and your bosses get away with your “storyline” you will have us all believing that chains and whips and cotton fields are “freedom”.
KAREN: Here is what I tweeted the day before that about Santilli and the risk of provocateurs hijacking what was marketed as a "peaceful demonstration": https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter1.1.16.pdf U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken, who resentenced Dwight Hammond Jr. and his son Steven, is not presiding over a Court under Article III of the US Constitution.
ANNA: The Hammonds aren’t subject to the “US Constitution”, Karen. And they never were. Wake up and hear the birds sing.
The “US Constitution” is the Constitution of the United States, not The Constitution for the united States of America that the Hammonds are heir to.
US District Judge Ann Aiken was usurping upon our jurisdiction just like all the other US District Courts have been doing for years, and she’s going to pay for it with her pension and her job and her reputation. There’s a new United States Supreme Court ruling that proves the fraud and the lack of jurisdiction and the ugly, criminal, corrupt nature of the entire court system the banks have been running as their very own little private debt collection system.
Once the dim politicians understand that they either bust you or get busted, guess who is going to suffer, Karen?
KAREN: Under the Global Currency Reset, the people are going to put the 1789 Constitution back into effect and end martial law, using Article V of the Constitution. The Hammonds' sentence will be commuted asap. Other people who did not harm anyone and were falsely imprisoned in private jails which are nothing more than a modern day slavery system should also expect to get their freedom restored. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:11 AM, J W wrote:
ANNA: That’s a good joke, too. The only “Constitution” these fraud artists can touch is their own corporate charters, known as the “Constitution of the United States of America” and the “Constitution of the United States “ which they have violated into oblivion by all their criminal acts. And none of those “Constitutions” date back to 1789. They were first adopted in 1868 and 1888.
If the bankers and the lawyers even pretend to touch our Constitution, even try to foist off some kind of look-alike-sound-alike “Constitutional Convention” and attempt to pass this off as having anything whatsoever to do with us, our land, our labor, our property or anything else related to us---- it will be absolute glaring proof of intent to further defraud the American People and intent to damage our lawful Republic.
At that point, Karen, we are no longer talking ignorance and white collar crime and fines and pay back and proper administration. At that point, we are talking knowing, willful, pre-meditated fraud and treason.
If that happens, we will have grounds to prosecute the current office holders for capital offenses. Think about that. You will be sending your pals the crooked politicians to the gallows, and after they are done testifying, there will be a long waiting line of bankers and lawyers to follow.
The other nations who have been harmed and defrauded will happily help us clean house and track down the criminals responsible. There won’t be a safe house from here to Hell for any of those responsible.
Millions upon millions of average people, politicians, other bankers, other lawyers, now know what went on here. You aren’t going to win in any case, but if you keep on like this, you will certainly have a lot more to lose. Judge Anna

JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625970 to www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs
Part 2 of Third Round with Karen Hudes
This is what Karen published on the web and my replies tit for tat:
Karen: January 4, 2016 http://annavonreitz.com/commerciallien.pdf http://annavonreitz.com/finalnoticeoflien.pdf When time really matters, and the world has agreed to something that will liberate us from slavery for the first time, (and prevent WWIII, starvation, and possible mass annihilation) there are bound to be agents and spoilers. Here are two attempts to steal the world's gold from the world's people. The first puts an astronomic amount at the disposal of Anna von Reitz, who in her own words is "legal adviser to former Pope Benedict XVI and now Pope Francis". https://ourgreaterdestiny.wordpress.com/…/…/03/call-to-duty/
Anna: I and approximately 900 other Americans brought complaint for Breach of Trust before Benedict XVI in his capacity as the Global Estate Trustee. The advice I gave him was to give American property back to Americans. He agreed and asked for help doing that. Here I am. Karen would rather pretend that I am an “Agent of the Vatican” than a Claimant against both the Vatican and the British Monarch but the facts and the recorded documents tell the tale as do my words and my work. You shall know them by their fruits. So far Ms. Hudes has come up with no less than five filthy devious schemes to avoid returning American Assets to Americans. She has consistently sought to get immunity for her bosses and profit for the colluding banks instead of justice for the people.
Ms. Hudes is constantly making these absurd statements to the effect that she and her efforts are preventing World War III. Ms. Hudes can’t even stand up and answer my questions or come up with an honest plan to return American assets. Good men and women worldwide are preventing World War III by looking around the corners, realizing that they have been duped, realizing that they are dealing with criminals in High Places, and that war crimes and fraud and breaches of trust have been perpetuated upon the Americans, Canadians, Brits, Aussies, and most of western Europe by a small cadre of colluding international banking interests.
Karen: The second attempt is even worse. I said I did not want to debate Ms. Reitz again because she did not fight fair and square, but kept on putting words in my mouth. So what did she do? She made me respond by filing a claim against the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF.
Anna: Ms. Hudes has no leg to stand on for her actions. That becomes very obvious when I question her, so she runs.
Karen: The other thing she did was to try and prevent the US from ending a secret military rule and returning to its Constitution of 1789.
Anna: What was that “Secret Military Rule”? The Lieber Code, created and imposed upon the Grand Army of the Republic by Abraham Lincoln in 1863, which made the Army responsible for safeguarding our money. Obviously, the politicians either duped or colluded with military brass and the Army failed that mission on an epic scale.
The truth of the matter is that Abraham Lincoln was only empowered to serve as “President” of a Joint Stock Trading Company doing business as the “United States”. He never held any office related to the actual organic states of the Union doing business as the united States of America. He worked for the Federal United States, which is a different bird entirely from the Continental United States.
Our Constitution was created and sealed in 1787. Their Constitution was created and sealed in 1789.
Our Constitution affects the united States of America. Their Constitution affects the United States.
Our States of America hold the patent to all land assets and also retained considerable non-delegated powers in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
Their United States is under contract to provide us with nineteen enumerated services. They are supposed to be our Trustees representing and protecting American interests on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. Their failure to do so resulted in our complaint to the Pope. __________________________________________________________ As Her Answer to Our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien She Posted the Following--- Though Again No Actual Hard Copy Has Been Received and Our Response Again Appears Below:
Karen: The World Bank 1818 H Street N.W. (202) 473-1000 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Washington, D.C. 20433 Cable Address: INTBAFRAD INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION U.S.A. Cable Address: INDEVAS January 4, 2016 To Ms. Anna von Reitz 2366 Sopark Road, Big Lake, Alaska (99652) and c/o Post Office Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska (99652) To Mr. James Clinton Belcher, by general notice:
Anna: Hahahahah! What is a “general notice” Ms. Hudes? Where did you go to Law School? Or was that a “law” school?
Karen: This refers to the purported Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien to World Bank/IBRD/IMF, issued on January 4, 2016 with respect to "assets on deposit in the Global Debt Facility." http://annavonreitz.com/finalnoticeoflien.pdf Please be advised: 1. This is not a "Final Notice of Obligation Lien" as there was no previous opportunity to refute the statements contained therein.
Anna What kind of a joke is this, Karen? You know the rules. You have to answer and rebut our facts item by item, point by point. To refresh your memory, the item to be rebutted is:
(1) The World Bank/IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the 1933 Bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated. And you haven’t done so. Yes or no, Karen? You must challenge our statement of fact with proof otherwise or admit it. We take it that you agree that the World Bank/IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the infamous 1933 Bankruptcy; you might as well, as Federal Titles 5 and 12 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934 would reduce you to a laughingstock if you didn’t admit it.
As for your assertion that our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien is “not a “Final Notice” because there was no previous opportunity to refute the statements contained therein”---- au contraire, Karen. Many dozens of opportunities were provided to the World Bank, IBRD, and IMF franchises via U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested between 2010 and 2014 under “Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents”. Due Process was provided at each step. On February
3, 2014 Final Notice of Commercial and Administrative Default was served on the STATE OF ALASKA, which is a franchise of the UNITED STATES, INC. which is a doing business name of the IMF which is an agency of the UN Corporation which is operated by the World Bank. Final Judgment and Civil Orders were issued on April 11, 2014. On July 4, 2014, the entire matter was published as a book, Disclosure 101, available on Amazon.com and “general notice” was provided to millions of people worldwide. Since then, we have published UCC-1 Financing Statements in favor of the States of America against the Principals of the World Bank, and have also published Public Liens related to the same. You need to look at page 169 of our published sworn affidavit of probable cause, entitled You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause, which is also available on Amazon.com, and which has been read by millions of people. Our “Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien” is exactly what it says it is, and your ten (10) days plus three (3) days mailing time are running.
KAREN: 2. Ms. Anna von Reitz and Mr. James Clinton Belcher do not represent any persons other than themselves.
ANNA: Fortunately, we are Beneficiaries and Heirs to the Assets, acknowledged heirs to the Priority Creditors of the 1933 Bankruptcy (that is, the living people that the World Bank, IBRD, and Federal Reserve defrauded, stole from, and never repaid), each of us is one of “the free sovereign and independent people of the United States” per Article III of the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, and not as you would mischaracterize us, an “inhabitant” subject to the British Crown. We are also organic states of the Union within organic nation states, who have delegated a share of our sovereignty to the unincorporated united States of America. Thanks to the Equal Protection requirements of our Organic Law, so are the better part of 390 million other Americans whose nativity occurred on dry land. Our Public Law also makes it clear that we (and they) can never be considered as Dual Citizens and cannot become United States Citizens absent performance of the duties established by 2 United States Statute-at-Large 153. As a result, Karen, as long as there is an American alive anywhere in the world whose nativity occurred on the land of one of the organic states, there is a live claim in probate against the World Bank, IBRD, and IMF; thanks to our published Irrevocable Will every such man and woman has equal interest in our claim. We---combined--- all those who are the heirs of parents and grandparents who suffered as a result of the 1933 Bankruptcy, are the only people who have standing in this matter by nature and birthright. We stand on the land, Ms. Hudes, claiming criminal Breach of Trust, Fraud, Unlawful Conversion, Reverse Trust Fraud, Conspiracy, and numerous other crimes against the British Monarch, the Federal United States, the banks you work for and the American Bar Association you belong to.
Recently, attempts were made by the scum at Wells Fargo (a securities corporation using a bank’s trademarked name to deceive and defraud people, owned by the “U.S. Attorney General”) to claim that we no longer exist as a nation. They said that we no longer had any international representation, that we no longer have a national currency in circulation, that we have “abandoned” our land and that the “unknown heirs” could not be found.
It’s the same kind of story that your bosses at the World Bank peddled when they received our assets as Secondary Creditors, knowing full-well who the actual Priority Creditors were and who their heirs are, and precisely where we live, too. It may make you feel warm and fuzzy to know that there are plenty of people who remember FDR’s gold confiscations very clearly as Witnesses having first-hand knowledge. We have their sworn testimony. On November 6, 2016, we issued a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty together with the “federal” Indigenous Nations precluding any claim that the States of America are not represented internationally. According to the Last Man Standing Rule governing both Treaties and Contracts, as long as there is a single competent “federal government” entity and a single competent delegate of the States of America holding up their respective jurisdictions The Constitution for the united States of America is as sound today as it was in 1787.
The United Nations Security Council and Secretary General Ki-Ban Moon and numerous other “World” officials have been duly served and notified of our action. As a result, the Native Nations have regained their standing on the land, and we have provided for designation of new “federal government” contractors to administer the nineteen enumerated services we are owed. The bankrupt District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and the UNITED STATES, INC. have nothing to do with us and we have nothing to do with them. If the banks didn’t make and keep enough money for themselves to pay their own debts after plundering and defrauding us for a hundred years, it’s their own problem. We are not standing as sureties for them and we are not allowing any hypothecation of debt against our assets and we are not buying or backing any private fiat script.
KAREN: 3. As provided in paragraph 6 of the Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement dated 11th August 1950, only assignees of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos, the mandate legal counsel and asset manager of Code TVM-LSM-666, who have been duly authenticated by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF possess capacity to move or remove after maturity in the year 2005 the assets on deposit in the Global Debt Facility.
ANNA: Probate of estates is never truly closed and is not “close-able” by anyone, Ms. Hudes, whether they are the estates of people or the estates of nations. The World Bank which has functioned as a knowing predator upon us has netted itself the uncomfortable position of serving as our Trustee in this matter and the whole world is staring up its skirt. Those who have “represented” the States of America since 1860 have been knowingly or unknowingly acting in gross Breach of Trust and under conditions of semantic deceit and fraud, both with respect to the American People and with respect to their dealings with other people abroad. We cannot speak to the intentions or the knowledge possessed by people like Douglas McArthur, Eisenhower, or Kennedy. What we can tell you is that with respect to us any action they took was and is null and void for lack of delegated authority and fraud.
KAREN: 4. Ms. Anna von Reitz and Mr. James Clinton Belcher have no standing to challenge the decision of the Board of Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund on the Global Currency Reset by virtue of Article VII of the Articles of Agreement of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Article IX of the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (See http://siteresources.worldbank.org/…/IBRD_Articles_of_Agree…. pdf )
ANNA: See above. The heirs and entitlement holders of an estate always have the right to challenge any disbursement or disposal of estate assets. Your bosses are in exactly the same position as the owners of a Pawn Shop caught in possession of stolen goods, and like it or not, the whole world knows it. Most tellingly, Karen, you haven’t denied it, either.
KAREN: 5. The United States is in interregnum, pending the reentry of its Constitution of 1789 into effect under Article V thereof. The monetary gold reserves of the United States are being deployed in the Global Currency Reset into United States Dollars in replacement of Federal Reserve Notes and for no other purpose and to no other person. The Global Currency Reset is agreed to among the nations, and every attempt to disrupt or block the Global Currency Reset is doomed to ignominy and failure.
ANNA: You have just reiterated our points for us, Karen. The United States (Inc.) is in “interregnum”--- that is, receivership---and facing another round of “reconstruction”. But the United States you are talking about is NOT the same as the United States of America, nor the same as The United States of America, and none of those entities are the same as the united States of America----which just happens to be the actual landlord.
The United States (Inc.) you are talking about is nothing but a private, mostly foreign-owned “governmental services corporation” and the landlord couldn’t give a fig if the cleaning help is in trouble financially, nor do we care if that same cleaning help is in trouble for committing fraud, identity theft, racketeering, unlawful conversion, and hosts of other crimes.
The States of America have been infamously mistreated by servants under contract to provide them with “Good Faith Service”. The “United States” we are part of are quite different from all the dopplegangers that a gang of thieves operated by the British Crown have created to cause confusion, practice deceit, and defraud people, but the jig is up.
The Great Fraud is over, and you had all better believe it and take it to heart. Your only safety lies in pretending cow-like ignorance, which shouldn’t be too hard to do.
It does not serve the interests of the people of the united States of America to use our assets of any kind--- not our labor, not our natural resources – as collateral backing any private bank script whether it is called a “Federal Reserve Note” or a “United States Note”. Nor are we under any obligation to accept any such arrangement.
We have appointed General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. in his capacity as a Commanding General of the American Armed Forces to act as our Fiduciary Deputy in this matter and have instructed him to receive and secure the gold and other assets that the Americans are owed to be used as collateral backing our own United States Silver Dollar defined as one ounce of fine silver. It is our stated intention to be able to interface with the BRICS Alliance while maintaining our own traditional precious metals currency.
The Trustees appointed by the Creditors of the United States, Inc., must be made aware of the fact that we are NOT standing as sureties for the debts of the United States, Inc. and will not honor any fixed exchange rate of any successor organization’s worthless paper for our labor or natural resources.
KAREN: 6. The statute of limitations invalidates any and all claims on the assets deposited in the Global Debt Facility. This procedure was agreed among all the nations in trust as inviolate and in sacred memory of the sacrifice that preceded this agreement. In disrespect of their predecessors and the Board of Governors' duty for the benefit of all of humanity, Ms. Anna von Reitz and Mr. James Clinton Belcher have the temerity, without meeting any burden of proof in showing the origin of the gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility, to insist that any one country, or peoples, should stand above the rest, and thereby plunge the entire humanity in another Dark Ages. For the foregoing reasons, the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF declare the purported Final Notice of Obligation Lien to be null and void.
ANNA: Ms. Hudes--- there is no statute of limitation on the crime of fraud, and the united States of America along with the countries making up the British Isles, Canada, Australia, Japan, Greece, India, and most of Western and Eastern Europe have all been defrauded by your employers and other collaborating and colluding banks, banking associations, and banking cartels. So much for any of them declaring anything whatsoever about “Law” nor the validity of our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien.
Speaking of which, Item 1 of our Lien remains unanswered. So do Items 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Unless I get serious answers and factual rebuttals in my hand no later than the close of business on January 17, 2016, every jot of our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien to World Bank/IBRD/IMF stands as Truth in International Law.
Finally, I want to address a couple other points, Ms. Hudes. You seem intent on painting us and the people of the united States of America as the greedy Bad Guys, when in fact you are working for the greedy Bad Guys and you are all part of a “System”---that is, criminal racket has that defrauded and abused everyone on the planet except for bankers and lawyers and their employee, cronies, and sycophants.
The Americans are only seeking the return of property that was stolen from their parents and grandparents, just as anyone on Earth would do. It is a just claim made by people who have been outrageously harmed and defrauded by sanctimonious con artists in nice suits.
But that day is done and the fraud is on the table. I am rubbing your nose in it, right now, and if you can’t smell the roses from where you are sitting, just put on your glasses and get closer to the page.
KAREN: Sincerely, Karen Hudes Acting General Counsel International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Overseer Mandate Trustee, Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666

JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625965 to www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Part 1 of Third Round with Karen Hudes
Today, I wrote a reply to numerous attacks from Karen Hudes. I want you all to see for yourselves how the facts lie. As most who have been following this, Karen Hudes took off running when I started asking her hard questions, so I decided to ask her bosses the hard questions. Here's what we sent to them on January 4th:
Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien to World Bank/IBRD/IMF
Issued January 4, 2016 to:
Board of Governors, World Bank/IBRD and IMF
Board of Directors, World Bank/IBRD and IMF
1818 H Street NW
Washington, DC 20433
Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested # 7006 0810 0003 3541 5106
Be it known to one and all, both living and dead: Karen Hudes is proposing that our gold be used to pay off the debts represented by Federal Reserve Notes--- that is, that we should pay for the odious debts of those who have defrauded us. This is to our knowledge the fifth such scheme Ms. Hudes has proposed. We living beneficiaries of the assets on deposit with the World Bank/IBRD and with the International Monetary Fund/IMF owed to the States of America and the free sovereign and independent people of the United States who also have beneficial interest as donors with respect to assets secondarily on deposit with the “Global Debt Facility” administered by the World Bank Board of Governors depose the following to be Material Fact established by Public Record:
(1) The World Bank/IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the 1933 Bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated;
(2) Upon settlement of the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated, the World Bank/IBRD knowingly received gold and other assets belonging to the Priority Creditors--- who are and who have always been the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” and their unincorporated States of America;
(3) The gold reserves contained in the Global Debt Facility and other accounts administered by the World Bank/IBRD and International Monetary Fund/IMF known as the “Infinity Accounts” were obtained at least in part as a result of illegal confiscations of privately held gold carried out by the Administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, promoted under inequitable exchange, duress and indemnity, followed by identity theft, falsification of political status records, and reverse trust and fiduciary trust fraud;
(4) The American gold and other assets such as credit and titles to land together with reasonable interest is owed as an inheritance to the living American people and their unincorporated organic states from which the gold was obtained;
(5) Ms. Karen Hudes has been informed that there is no Constitutional authority allowing for any officials or agents of the Federal United States --including Federal State and Federal County Officials-- to receive assets in behalf of the living people and the unincorporated states; she has also been informed that there is no agreement on the part of the lawful beneficiaries allowing the World Bank/IBRD/IMF to use our gold to pay for, buy back, or otherwise collateralize Federal Reserve Notes, United States Notes, or any other private bank script;
The Board of Governors and Executive Directors have ten (10) days plus three days mailing time from the mailing date of this Final Notice to rebut the truth of the five (5) statements above, or they shall stand as Truth in Commerce and self-enforcing international law creating an effective and collectible commercial obligation lien against the Global Debt Facility, the World Bank/IBRD, and International Monetary Fund/ IMF for the assets valued at $370 billion United States Dollars and interest due, payable immediately in full, as well as establishing our collateral claim on the land assets of the Continental United States owed to the United Colonies and the States of America however these assets may now be represented, defined, en-titled or accounted and in the possession of the respective banks;
We have specifically directed Ms. Hudes that it is our Will to use our gold to back our own national currency, the actual United States Dollar, defined as one ounce of fine silver, and that General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., is hereby appointed to act as our Fiduciary Deputy in this matter and is uniquely enabled to receive the gold, titles, and other assets owed to the American people and is obligated to safely convey and secure these assets for our intended use by his receipt of them;
We note that the Federal United States and the UNITED STATES are in Commercial and Administrative Default with respect to us and our estates and we specifically give Notice to the Board of Governors and the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank/IBRD and to the International Monetary Fund/IMF of this fact. There can be no presumption against us nor against our organic united states nor our unincorporated States of America, no claim that we stand as sureties in behalf of any incorporated entity and no assumption of contract, and our receipt of any gold under this or any other distribution in no way removes, releases or impairs our claim to these or any other or additional assets or remedies we are owed;
We have been the victims of institutionalized fiduciary trust fraud and criminal Breach of Trust which must now be addressed. The Members of Congress who have voted themselves and their own plenary government a “dollar for dollar” fixed exchange rate for private bank notes, that is, Federal Reserve Notes --- I.O.U’s ---as pretended equitable exchange for our actual United States Dollars defined as one ounce of pure silver, have acted in breach of trust and contempt of the Constitution; their inequitable claims, acts, and debts stand null and void, ab initio, repudiated as odious debt accrued as the result of purposeful constructive fraud;
Any bank that continues to exchange “Federal Reserve Notes” for actual assets upon the presumption that the American people and the American states are standing as surety, or presumes that the American people are willingly engaged in this fraud, acts as an accomplice to gross constructive fraud and breach of trust imposed by monopoly inducement practiced against the innocent American people and their organic states on the land. Any court or international organization extending bankruptcy protection to the Federal Reserve is similarly supporting and participating in this same fraud;
A Declaration of Joint Sovereignty has been issued by the States of America and Indigenous Tribal Governments of the Native American Nations and addressed to the United Nations, together with updated Sovereign Letters Patent. More than 500 million United States Silver Dollars remain in circulation, all fifty (50) unincorporated States of America are in operation, an estimated 360 million Americans claim their lawful birthright political status as organic states of the union and free sovereign and independent people of the United States; they are all beneficiaries and heirs and are owed their complete inheritance plus return of all donations held in trust, free and clear of any debt, lien, encumbrance or presumption of contract or presumption of debt assumption. Any claim that the free sovereign and independent people of the United States are “stateless” is unconscionable and this Notice of the fact has been served;
This Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien is issued upon this Fourth Day of January in the year 2016 for the causes enumerated by the living heirs and beneficiaries known as Anna Maria Riezinger and James Clinton Belcher from without the United States, without representation, claiming their natural political status as free sovereign and independent people of the United States and as organic states of the union having reached the age of majority, being of sound mind and body, not indigent, not bankrupt, not penniless, not needy, and by no other means nor manner incapacitated, limited, obligated or under duress of any kind; we direct the trustees of the World Bank/IBRD and International Monetary Fund/IMF to immediately settle and balance all accounts and return all American gold and collateral assets owed to the American people upon release to General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., upon his acceptance of it as our appointed Fiduciary Deputy, for use as collateral backing our actual money, the United States Silver Dollar, defined as one ounce of pure silver.
As natural heirs and beneficiaries we specifically forbid any misuse of our gold to benefit any foreign central bank or incorporated governmental services corporation and forbid the release of our gold to any organization or individual who does not owe us full duty as our specifically appointed Fiduciary Deputy obligated to act in our behalf and according to our instruction as a condition of his receipt of our assets. So we depose and say finally that Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents and Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, whereupon we have set our Signatures and Seals as Witness to our Will in this matter: ______________________________seal_________________by Anna Maria Riezinger, beneficiary, one of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”, non-negotiable autograph, all rights reserved. ______________________________seal_________________by James Clinton Belcher, beneficiary, one of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”, non-negotiable autograph, all rights reserved. cc: General Joseph F.Dunford, Jr.
John Forbes Kerry, Secretary of State
Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations

JANUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.625959 to www.opg.me
The trials and tribulations that many people accused of “criminal offenses” are a direct result of not understanding the nature and cause of the accusation. The end result of this lack of knowledge and understanding is that the United States and the States have the largest prison population in the world and execute the most people. Lives and families are destroyed. Family farms are stolen by unscrupulous judges and attorneys. Hard-working folks who have done no wrong have lost their homes and savings and have been reduced to a state of poverty by an encounter with the American system of injustice. The horror stories are limitless. This author believes that this lack of understanding is the result of the “dumbing down of America,” a part of a scheme devised and orchestrated by foreign and domestic enemies of the people of the United States of America, not the least of which are the American Bar Association and the various State Bar Associations which sprang from England. These Bar Associations have concocted a Luciferian scheme bringing the maritime jurisdiction onto the land and the scheme undoubtedly includes every member of every bar association up to the dishonorable justices of the Supreme Court. These foreign and domestic enemies of the people of the united States of America are believed by many, including the author, to have schemed for years, at least since the founding of our nation, to establish a total takeover of not only our country, but the entire planet and to enslave the people in their demonic quest to establish a One World Government or “New World Order” created out of the chaos of the destruction of Liberty and to be founded upon the ruins of the principles on which our once great nation was established and with the slave labor supplied by a once free, self sufficient and proud people
Yes, Virginia, there is a conspiracy. There is a conspiracy by attorneys to steal everything that you have and to make you a slave. The members of the bar have bestowed honors, privileges and immunities upon themselves in direct violation of the very constitutions that they have sworn an oath to uphold so they can steal with impunity. They have defecated on the principles of law and justice. This author has personally witnessed them laugh about their “license to steal” when referring to their membership in the bar. Lawyers have infiltrated and taken control of the legislatures so they can enact laws for their own unjust enrichment. For the most part, they occupy or control the offices of the executive branches of the governments of the several states so they can sign the legislative enactments into law. They absolutely control the judicial branch so they can adjudicate and enforce the laws and divide the spoils among them selves. They control the banks so they can launder their ill-gotten gains. These zealous advocates of injustice will strip you of everything of value you have if they are given the least opportunity. If you hire one to help you out of a scrape with the law, for the most part, you will end up in prison while your lawyer is sipping margueritas on the beach in Cancun, paid for with your money. Your ex-wife might even be with him. Only if you have as much money as T. Cullen Davis or O.J. Simpson once did, might you be able to buy yourself some justice. The justice these two colorful characters bought for themselves cost them their fortunes, but they evaded imprisonment and possible execution for a price paid in money.
Most people don’t have the financial resources with which to bribe the members of the bar, so they languish in prison while the lawyers take what little property they had, plus a bonus from the State for their “services.” When you go into a court accused of a “crime,” and are inclined to hire a lawyer or accept a court appointed lawyer to help you out, remember that the lawyer is being paid by the STATE and is licensed by the STATE, the judge is licensed and paid by the STATE, the jury is licensed and paid by the STATE (they at least have driver licenses, don’t they?), the prosecutor is licensed and paid by the STATE. If the judge orders a psychological evaluation to determine if you are competent to stand trial, the psychobabelist is also licensed and paid by the STATE. The cop that accused you and who will testify against you is licensed and paid by the STATE. If you are tried and sentenced to death, the cleric who comes to pray for your miserable soul before the execution is licensed and paid by the STATE. The guy who sticks the needle in your arm for the euthanasia is licensed and paid by the STATE. After they inject you with poison, the doctor that pronounces you dead is licensed and paid by the STATE. Could there be a hint of conflict of interest here? If the reader has ever had any experience with the modern criminal injustice system, the term “contempt of court” has taken on a whole new meaning for him.
The lawyers fill the prisons with people who have injured no one but are convicted of statutory crimes of a maritime jurisdiction. Prisons are filled with people whose only “crime” was to be in possession of a substance that they, the lawyers, have declared to be illegal. Good parents are separated from their children for attempting to discipline them, or because of divorce. Fathers are in prison because they cannot pay the court ordered child support; it is blatantly imprisonment for debt. People are in prison for exercising their presumed right to keep and bear arms. People are routinely thrown in jail for non-jailable traffic offenses and the Supreme Court in Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, #99-1408, (Apr. 24, 2001) has said it is OK. People are jailed every day for such heinous offenses as not wearing a seat belt or not paying a “motor vehicle” registration fee. America, the land of the slave and the home of the fee, has more people in prison and more people on death row than any other country in the world, and new prisons are being built every day. And in order to keep these new prisons filled beyond Capacity, the various lawyer-controlled legislatures are busy enacting more and more new statutory maritime crimes.
Woe be unto you if you don’t pay a tax that is presumed to be due. If you don’t pay up, the zealous advocates of injustice will drag you into their secret maritime jurisdiction on the presumption of a tax debt and steal your bank account, your car, your home and anything else they can find. You may even go to prison. If you resist too much or know too much, they will send their minions, the police, to assassinate you in broad daylight with impunity. The lawyers protect their obedient minions. These police agencies, whose motto is “to protect and serve,” get away with murder on a routine basis. Yes, they do protect and serve their masters, the lawyers, very well. This is why this essay must be spread far and wide as quickly as possible. The word must get out. The attorneys will stop at nothing to keep the scheme of their maritime jurisdiction secret. One advantage that the people have is that the rats are not yet totally in control of the Internet. Please use it; if you have a web page, please post this article. Another advantage that the people have is numbers; there are more of us than there are of them. The greatest advantage that the people have is the truth. The lawyers fear it; they go to extraordinary lengths to suppress it. If you want to know what fear smells like, find a judge after you read this article and explain what you are about to learn from the succeeding pages. Mail copies of this article to every lawyer, judge, legislator and sheriff you can, if you know of any who can read. Let the pungent odor of fear waft across the land. They know that once the truth escapes it cannot be held back and once again covered with darkness, at least not for several generations. When they are exposed, they will be powerless and vulnerable. People eventually recognize the truth; the truth is light, and the darkness flees from the light. The American people still have a sense of justice, and the lawyers especially fear justice.
How have they gotten away with the fraud for so long and managed to keep secret the maritime jurisdiction that has come onto land? The answer is; because the lawyers also control the fourth estate and institutions of religion and learning. The news media aids and abets the Esquires by suppressing the truth and perpetrating lies. It is a form of Orwellian mass mind control. The people are constantly fed a stream of propaganda through the network news, the newspapers, the public schools, colleges and universities (all lawyer controlled), and most especially, the incorporated 501(c)3 churches. Like all other corporations these churches are controlled by lawyers. The corporations that the people work for aid and abet the lawyers by perpetuating the false truths in their corporate policies. The subliminal messages transmitted are the lies that America is a free country, slavery is abolished, America is the great land of opportunity, there is separation of church and state, and “good Americans” and especially “good Christians” should submit to the government; it is the patriotic “Christian” thing to do. These themes never cease; they are constantly bombarded and ingrained into the psyche of the people. Hitler recognized in his work, Mein Kampf that if you told a lie and repeated and reinforced it often enough, the people would begin to accept the lie as a truth. The bigger and more outrageous the lie the better. After a period of time, when the lie is sufficiently programmed into the psyche of the national consciousness and is accepted as truth, the human mind does a remarkable thing. If the truth is then presented, it will be rejected as a lie. The psychobabelists have recognized this phenomena and describe it as cognitive dissidence. This cognitive dissidence can be compared to programming a computer; if you program lies and false information into the computer, it will spew out lies and false information or just lock up completely and cease to function. Junk goes in; junk comes out. This cognitive dissidence is powerful and difficult to overcome. Your authors have struggled to overcome it for years.
Another method very successfully used by the lawyers to keep their secret under the cover of darkness is the age-old strategy of sending their minions to infiltrate, divide and conquer any organization of people banding together to resist the present tyranny of the injustice system. The authors have personally witnessed the effectiveness of this strategy. The minions of the Esquires sent to infiltrate “patriot organizations” are intelligent, skillful and highly trained in the arts of deception and betrayal. They are people of likable personalities, who are able to gain trust, induce people into “offending” some maritime penal regulation and set them up for prison. The most active or successful “patriots” are the ones on the top of the list to be targeted. They must be beaten into submission or “neutralized,” sometimes with extreme prejudice; witness the fate of Gordon Kahl. Some of these infiltrators are undoubtedly honest people that have run afoul of a maritime penal regulation and have caved in to the pressure put on them by lawyers and their minions to inform on others in order to avoid incarceration. Some do it purely for money. Others are agents of the lawyers who travel the “patriots’ circuit” holding seminars and disseminating false information and “sure fire remedies” guaranteed to be the proverbial magic bullets. Many good people have lost their property and liberty pursuing these false remedies sold by patriots for profit who are paid by the attorneys to lie and then double dip into their victim’s pocket by selling the false information. And then there are other patriots holding seminars who truly believe that they have the answer, and end up in jail after an attempt to apply their own theory. It is understandable how one can fall victim to a false “patriot for profit” scheme. Your authors have been victims of some of these schemes. People that run afoul of the American system of injustice are so desperate for some relief that they become easy targets