www.opg.me - Mobiles UK 07763906847 - +34 602568239[whats app]
www.ukrefugees.com - emails: email@example.com - firstname.lastname@example.org
www.jewdicialterrorism.com - skype contact = mrmikeclarke
www.victimsofabuseofpower.com - twittor contact opg.me#
www.opposepredatoryguardians.com facebook.com/mikeclarkeofoldham visitors, 1st READ the 5 page overview then take me to the NUTS & BOLTS OF THE EVIDENCE Or here you can listen to the LINK of 1 hour radio interview 11/4/2014
Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable"whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash! These Websites published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article10(1) READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT Sui juris, in propria persona www.opposepredatoryguardians.com
MAY 20 2017 Visiter No.644087 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THE REAL CROOKS IN GOVERNMENT
PLEASE PASS THIS AROUND, UNTIL EVERY ONE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ IT... THIS IS SURELY SOMETHING WE ALL NEED TO THINK ABOUT!!!!
THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE PENSION IS THAT THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN ALL THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY EVER COLLECTED OLD AGE PENSION.
WHERE DID ALL THAT MONEY GO?
Remember, not only did you and I contribute to our Pension, our employer did, too. It totalled 15% of your income before taxes.
If you averaged only £15 000 over your working life, that's close to £220,500. Read that again. Did you see anywhere that the Government paid in one single penny?
We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government bank to ensure that you and I would have a
retirement pension from the money we put in, it was not money that the Government had any right to spend elsewhere.
Now they've started to call the money we paid in an
'entitlement' when we reach the age to take it back.
If you calculate the future invested value of £2500 per year
(yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5%
interest (that's less than what the govt. pays on the money that it borrows from overseas), after 49 years of working you'd have
If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive £26,787.60 per
year and it would last better than 30 years (that means until you're 95 if you retire at age 65) and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit!
If you bought an annuity with the money and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of £1976.40 per month.
THE CROOKS IN GOVERNMENT HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER ROBBERY THAN THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERS EVER DID.
My foot !! IT'S MY MONEY!! I paid IN cash for my pension.
Just because they borrowed the money to spend on other things, that doesn't make my pension some kind of charity or handout!!
Remember MP's benefits? ---
outrageous retirement packages,
67 days paid holidays,
three weeks paid holidays,
unlimited paid sick days.
Now that really should be called welfare entitlements, yet they have the nerve to call my O A P retirement payments entitlements?
We're "broke" and the government can't help our own OAPs, our ex-service personnel, our orphans or our homeless
Yet in the past few years we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, Turkey, India, Pakistan, etc., etc., etc. Literally, BILLIONS of Pounds !!!
But they can't help our own citizens!
Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed old age pension have to beg social services to receive additional aid, while our government and religious organizations pour hundreds of billions of £££ tons of food to foreign countries!
They call the old age pension an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for us to collect, the government is running out of money.
Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?
It was supposed to be in a securely locked box, not to be used as part of the Government's general funds.
Sad, isn't it, that some people won't have the guts to forward
this. I'm in the category with guts enough to do it - - - and I just did.
I hope some of you will do the same.
MAY 16 2017 Visiter No.644011 to mike/ann's www.opg.me EMAIL TO POLICE REQUIRING AN UPDATE here
The 1st letter had this problem so I despatched another and now that too has the same problem?? Something fishy going on... and so now I have an agent that will deliver by hand to serve onto the treasury seeing as the royal mail seem on the face of it to not be able to deliver. reply 13.5.2017
MAY 10 2017 Visiter No.643885 to mike/ann's www.opg.me FRAUD ON & IN THE COURTS RIFE READ ABOUT IT HERE
MAY 8 2017 Visiter No.643830 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THE WORLD WE MADE
Who or What Is At the Bottom of All This?
Queen Victoria and Benjamin D'Israeli
The British Crown and the Dutch East India Company
The Great Abomination, aka, Semiramis, aka, Mystery Babylon
The Office of the Roman Pontiff
The Tax Collectors of the Pontifex Maximus -- aka Bar Associations
Clueless, Corrupt Politicians
Clueless, Corrupt Military Leaders
In more or less that order.......
At a certain point, it becomes a circular argument, because all these maladies are linked.
Satan, the Father of All Lies, the Great Deceiver, has been hard at work deluding and misleading people for thousands of years and he has had a real hay-day here thanks to our gullibility.
Queen Victoria and her favorite Prime Minister, Benjamin D'Israeli opened the ancient Pandora's Box of Evil Tricks and Babylonian Bullshit in order to finance the Raj in India and that whole debacle.
The British Crown and the Dutch East India Company Heirs have been colluding and fighting each other by turns for the last three centuries and have been causing nothing but trouble on a worldwide basis since they started indulging in the fruits of Institutionalized insurance fraud circa 1702.
Semiramis, the Queen of Sumeria and wife of Noah's Grandson, Nimrod, also known as The Great Abomination and Ashtoreth and Astarte and Isis and Cybele -- started her own religion based on infanticide, tree worship, sex as a sacrament, and idolatry which included the use of graven images and symbolic coins as money shortly after the Great Flood. [This venal religion known as Mystery Babylon is also known as Satanism and practices ritual sacrifice of children and deliberate subterfuge and secrecy. It basically promises its members secret knowledge and then gets them into compromised positions via sex and drugs and participation in ugly things and then simply blackmails them and threatens them to go along with whatever the leaders want done.]
The Office of the Roman Pontiff --- the Church has been trying to serve two masters ever since the Council of Nicea --- and this is reflected in the Pope trying to hold two offices at once, one sacred and one profane. The Office of the Roman Pontiff is the secular, pagan, and profane office. No man should be placed in such a position, but that is what has gone on.
The Pontiff or Pontifex Maximus as the Romans called him two centuries before the birth of Jesus was a deal maker and breaker, the literal "bridge" between jurisdictions under the Lex Mercantoria, the Magician responsible for the creation of poppets now known as corporations and "legal fiction persons". This is why Francis is responsible for the wrong-doing of all these corporations and why, under ecclesiastical law, the Pope retains the ability to change, repeal, or annul any corporate law or decision. He literally holds the charter of all incorporated entities on Earth--- C Corps, S Corps, LLC's, trade unions, cooperatives, foundations, trusts--- you name it, and at the end of the day, all these things have been created by and are the responsibility of the Roman Curia. So when things go wrong and commercial corporations start mercenary wars and pass oppressive "legislation" --- don't even pause. Head straight to Rome and start banging your dishes on the floor like angry dogs.
Tax Collectors of the Pontifex Maximus -- the Bar Associations. Also since the Second Century BCE, the Pontifex Maximus has employed peculiar tax collectors: priests of Cybele (See Mystery Babylon comment above; "Cybele" is another name for Semiramis.) who wore black robes and white wigs and who practiced their own peculiar twisted form of writing (cursive as in "cursing") and their own equally twisted form of language today known popularly as "legalese" or the "language of fraud".
All the above have combined with clueless and corrupt political and military leaders to result in The Great Fraud and The Mess which the world is currently facing up to.
MAY 6 2017 Visiter No.643810 to mike/ann's www.opg.me USA COPS TURNING IN THEIR BADGES DUE TO FREEMAN MOVEMENT
APRIL 27 2017 Visiter No.643590 to mike/ann's www.opg.me Pass the Word to Mr. Trump The Fruits of Endless War -- How Insurance Fraud Funds "Your" Government(s)
Let me say it again for the benefit of all those still asleep: there is (1) the actual United States composed of fifty (50) independent sovereign nation-states which are geographically defined, (2) the Territorial United States which only exists on paper composed of (57) fifty-seven incorporated "States of States" such as the State of Washington, and (3) the Municipal United States which also exists only on paper composed of (57) fifty-seven incorporated "STATES OF STATES" such as the "STATE OF OHIO".
Unfortunately, the perpetrators of this grand fraud were allowed to create these shadow "states" via the loop-hole provided by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 giving the Congress the plenary right to govern the District of Columbia. So they have. They set up shop for themselves in 1864 and have been operating as a crime syndicate ever since. They have played no end of semantic deceits and made false claims against you and your assets (a process called "hypothecating debt") and have indulged in constructive fraud and kidnapping and racketeering and inland piracy at your expense.
As if paying for three levels of government was not enough, the vermin are presently trying to saddle you with a fourth tier of useless eaters---"Regional Government" under "UN" auspices. I say that because government produces nothing but more government, therefore, if anyone is to be discarded as "useless eaters", I suggest that it be the bankers and politicians and government workers first in line for permanent lay-offs.
Soon, if this cancerous and fraudulent process of endlessly proliferating government is not stopped, a very tiny segment of the productive population will be laboring day and night to support unproductive government workers and government dependents and all sanity will be turned upside down and on its head. You will literally be the slaves of your "public servants".
This is the backdrop for today's subject matter --- the vast insurance fraud that has been used since 1702 as the means to fund government and also the reason why we have endless war in our midst.
The first scam is to seize upon you and your estate while you are still a helpless baby in your cradle. The liars pretend that you have been "abandoned" at the hospital and that your Mother is a mere "informant"--- turning you over as a ward of their "State of State" organization.
Now that they have a false claim to work from, they take out a life insurance policy on their "ward" to profit themselves in the event of your death. This guarantees that whatever they may have to spend on you--- which is usually nothing thanks to your gullible parents--- will be returned with profit upon your demise.
Your entire estate--- your name, your body, your assets and even your rights--- are all rolled over into an ESTATE trust benefiting yet another level of government. This trust is set up as a generation skipping trust and your "State of State" Guardians obligingly agree (on your behalf and for your own good, of course) that you "agree"---- without ever actually agreeing or even knowing about all this crap going on in the background--- to "donate" all your worldly goods and assets to this generation skipping trust and to forego all benefit yourself.
That's how all YOUR contributions to the IRS become characterized as "gift and estate taxes".
Now obviously, when you die it is pay off time for the government criminals responsible for this "System". Thirty days after YOUR Death Certificate is issued they make a Claim on Abandonment against your ESTATE and they seize it for their own benefit. They also collect on YOUR life insurance policy.
So now you know why war is so profitable and why it has been constantly perpetuated by the fiends occupying Rome, the City of London, District of Columbia, and the United Nations City State, all of which are owned and operated by three groups of Satanists, most of whom pretend to be Jews "but are not Jews, but a Synagogue of Satan" to quote Jesus.
How to end it? Well, there are relatively few of them and a great many of us. If we wise up and refuse to play their ugly games they are shit out of luck. If we grab the politicians by both ears and bang our dishes on the floor like angry dogs the fear of the electorate will eventually win out over their other base instincts.
Reform of the entire insurance industry so as to put an end to profiting from death is a start. Refusing to sign any paperwork for any hospital ever again is another. (Did you know that your dead cadaver is worth $11.4 million USD???) Suing the rats in international court venues and operating our own Federal Postal District Courts to do it, without employing any Bar Association Members, is another.
Educating your friends, family, and neighbors is of paramount importance, as well as getting your own political status firmly declared in public record. Organizing your county and state jural assemblies comes next. Signing up and serving your state militias (as opposed, of course, to any "state of state militias" which are illegal commercial mercenary forces) is another big step in the right direction.
Any decent man or woman who holds a Bar Card should tear it up in little pieces, throw it down the toilet, and come join our "Living Law Firm". I say that not as a merely moral judgment, but as a practical prescription. If the Bar Members themselves don't see why this hideous crap has to stop---and take immediate steps to end it ---- they will be the first ones to go.
Talk to your insurance companies and cancel your policies. Chances are you are just paying to protect property that a foreign government is pretending to own after lying and saying that you (or your false Guardians at the State of State office) donated your ESTATE to them.
Outright slaughter of those responsible has been suggested, but that just plays into the hands of the vermin in back of it all. Remember--- those people, the ones actually and factually behind all this, don't care if it is a hospital administrator who dies for condoning and participating in this crime against humanity, or a Congressmen who is strung up in his hometown as an accomplice to it, or an innocent baby who is murdered as a consequence of it. All they care about is the fact that somebody dies, and they get a big pay off as a result.
So, my dears, in approaching this scenario, it is very important to keep your tempers and to be cold as ice and to be determined as steel that this entire "System" is going to be identified and destroyed--- root, stem, and leaf.
Keep calm and get even. And get going. Now. Today.
All evidence suggests that Donald Trump is being fed a line of absolutely unconscionable nonsense. He is being told that the "government of the United States" is insolvent--- and that much is---artificially-- true; what he isn't being told is that all the money he needs is in fact at his command and that the entire insolvency, National Debt, etc., is only an appearance being created by dishonest bookkeeping.
What he also isn't being told is that he has no need for Israeli debt or Rothschild credit, because these banks are only middlemen. He can go straight to the source and dispense with all the negotiations and demands and offers of these Third Party interlopers.
With his help, we can take back what rightfully belongs to America and Americans, who will then naturally assist him in his endeavors to make America Great Again instead of swaggering around beating other innocent nations senseless.
For starters, he can stop trying to drum up business by dropping bombs in Afghanistan and missiles in Syria and rattling sabers against North Korea.
He can realize that his entire problem is with dishonest banks and dishonest bookkeeping and order--- as Commander in Chief --- a competent external audit. Once that happens it will be painfully apparent to everyone that the "United States" is not really broke and that vast bank-inspired bankruptcy fraud has been committed instead. The Puerto Rican Electrical Utility they are bankrupting to use as a pass through siphon is another case in point.
It will also be apparent that the only reason we are having any trouble with Syria, North Korea, and Iran is that they are the only sizeable countries left on Earth that are not hobbled unto death by a Central Bank in the Vatican Bank stable.
Yesterday, in "The Fruits of Endless War-- How Insurance Fraud Funds "Your" Government(s)" it was fully explained how you are being defrauded and how insurance fraud related to insurance annuities and generation skipping trusts and false claims of guardianship are used by crime syndicates masquerading as governments to pick your pockets clean. It was also explained how they have made death into Big Business benefiting themselves and why it is to everyone's benefit --- everyone on Earth --- to get rid of this fraud and those perpetuating it.
As long as death by any means equals profit for anyone, we will have motive for crime that results in death---- whether it is poisoning the food or the water, vaccinating us with poisons, polluting our air with chemtrails, or causing senseless wars.
So Job One for Mr. Trump, the Pope, the Queen, and every other muckety-muck you can lay your hands on, is to put an end to the entire insurance fraud industry and the entire motive to profit from the death of innocent people by any means at all.
We also explained how all this graft is creating cancerous growth of government and layers upon layers of government employees and government dependents that are sucking the entire world economy dry without producing anything but more government.
Tell Mr. Trump the truth. Make him responsible for knowing it, whether he acts upon it or not. Tell Mr. Putin, too. And Prince William. And the Lord Mayor of London. And your local police chief. And the commander at your local Air Force base. Tell the local Cardinal Archbishops and the Pope. Just give them a copy of "The Fruits of Endless War -- How Insurance Fraud Funds "Your" Government(s)" and suggest that it is time to find another way of living, being, and operating a government.
It's time for all the fraud, deceit, and cooked books to end. It's time for the motive to murder for profit to end. In fact, full stop, it's time for a whole new world to begin.
APRIL 26 2017 Visiter No.643551 to mike/ann's www.opg.me GROSS CONTEMPT to WITHHOLD DOCUMENTS & A FRAUD ON THE COURT
Nemo iudex in causa sua- Natural Justice, Conflict of Interest, Administrative Tribunal
No ‘person’ can judge a case in which he or she is party or in which he/she has an interest.
"The maxim that no man is to be judge in his own case should be held sacred. And that is not to be confined to a cause in which he is a party, but applies to a cause in which he has an interest....
Nemo judex in causa sua is a Latin phrase that means, literally, "no-one should be a judge in his own cause." It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest. The rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: "Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done".
"This will be a lesson to all ... tribunals to take care, not only that in their decrees they are not influenced by their personal interests, but to avoid the appearance of labouring under such an influence."
Her Majesties Courts and Tribunals ‘Service’ HMCTS in Safety Partnerships / Multi Agency Partnerships. ? Possible bias or vested interests?
"As a general principle, this is not permitted in law because the taint of bias would destroy the integrity of proceedings conducted in such a manner."
One early case was Wright v Crump in which the Mayor of Hereford, England, circa 1790, claimed title to a local house. So he arranged with a friend to lease the real estate to him and then that friend brought a legal action for ejectment of the occupants before, well, Lord Mayor himself, who found for the claimant. The occupants appealed the decision to the Court of King's Bench and the Mayor, sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
Frome United Breweries Co. v Bath,  AC 586
Wright v Crump, 2 Ld. Raym. 766; also at 92 E.R. 12 (1790). Cited in Franklin F. http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/N/NemoJudexInParteSua.aspx http://ijls.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/IJLS_Vol_2_Issue_2_Article_2_OBrien.pdf
This article explores various aspects of the No-Bias rule in Constitutional Justice. There are three types of bias, namely subjective bias, presumed bias and apparent bias. Four different aspects of the No-Bias rule will be examined in this article. Firstly, the area of subjective bias and its use in the law today will be explored. Secondly, the argument that presumed bias should be adopted in this jurisdiction will be examined. Thirdly, the competing tests for apparent bias will be analysed. Finally, the idea of the „reasonable observer‟ in the current test for apparent bias will be examined and discussed. http://www.yalelawjournal.org/essay/contra-nemo-iudex-in-sua-causa-the-limits-of-impartiality Regularly invoked by the Supreme Court in diverse contexts, the maxim nemo iudex in sua causa—no man should be judge in his own case—is widely thought to capture a bedrock principle of natural justice and constitutionalism. I will argue that the nemo iudex principle is a misleading half-truth. Sometimes rulemakers in public law do and should design institutions to respect the value of impartiality that underlies the nemo iudex principle. In other cases, they do not and should not. In many settings, public law makes officials or institutions the judges of their own prerogatives, power, or legal authority. Officials or institutions may determine their own membership, award their own compensation, rule on the limits of their own jurisdiction, or adjudicate and punish violations of rules they themselves have created.
Judgment - In Re Pinochet continued ... The principle is expressed in the maxim that nobody may be judge in his own cause (nemo judex in sua causa).
Regina v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2); HL 15 Jan 1999 http://swarb.co.uk/regina-v-bow-street-metropolitan-stipendiary-magistrate-ex-parte-pinochet-ugarte-no-2-hl-15-jan-1999/ https://www.oxbridgenotes.co.uk/revision_notes/law-administrative-law/samples/bias-impartiality-and-independence
Keep in mind that HMCTS are in safety partnerships with multi agencies , give this serious consideration and hold them to their constitutions.
Nemo Judex In Sua Causa: A Man Shall Not Be A Judge In His Own Cause
If we examine the transcript of the online version of R v Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate ex parte Pinochet (No 2)  2 WLR 272 we find the following reasoning by Lord Hutton who agreed to the appeal. Lord Hutton states:
I find persuasive the observations of Lord Widgery C.J. in Regina v. Altrincham Justices, Ex parte Pennington  1 Q.B. 549, 552F:
There is no better known rule of natural justice than the one that a man shall not be a judge in his own cause. In its simplest form this means that a man shall not judge an issue in which he has a direct pecuniary interest, but the rule has been extended far beyond such crude examples and now covers cases in which the judge has such an interest in the parties or the matters in dispute as to make it difficult for him to approach the trial with the impartiality and detachment which the judicial function requires.
Accordingly, application may be made to set aside a judgment on the so-called ground of bias without showing any direct pecuniary or proprietary interest in the judicial officer concerned.
"Before you were born, the bankers operated a scam intended to rob all members of the 'general public'. They removed all forms of money and replaced it with worthless notes which read "I promise to pay the bearer..." with another worthless bank note (FIAT Currency).
They then managed to do away with the Government and replace is with groups of commercial companies which they own. They cunningly named these companies so that they 'look' like Government. They took over the printing of the worthless bank notes with their private company called "The Bank of England" which is meant to sound like a Government Organisation, although it MOST DEFINITELY is NOT.
The next step, in their 'lets be honest here' quite clever plan, was to get their company which sounds like the Government, to ask their other company "The Bank of England" to print them lots of (worthless) money and to charge interest on that money, over and above the face 'value' of the Currency. This excess interest amount is called "The National Debt" in order to fool ordinary people into believing that their Country some how owes somebody large amounts of money.
So FIRSTLY, there is really NOTHING owed at all. SECONDLY, there IS no money. THIRDLY, the Country does not owe anything, and in the unlikely event that there were a genuine debt, then it has nothing to do with ordinary people any way as it is just a notional debt incurred by one commercial company to another commercial company! (ALL owned by the same people)
This supposed debt has been boosted over the years to a ridiculous level which could NEVER, EVER be paid off, and you will no doubt be glad to learn that all income tax is now paid to the owners of these commercial companies. Isn't it great to be paying vast sums of money to a commercial company which has never done ANYTHING for you and which holds you in utter contempt because you havent discovered their SCAM and continue to pay lots of ridiculous taxes, fee's and charges! None of which, by the way, you have to pay at all! All combined, these charges amount to nearly 80% of a persons earned income!
Do you enjoy living on one fifth of what you COULD have HAD!?
Anyway, to strengthen their SCAM, they have invented a Language of Lies called 'Legalese' or 'Legal Terminology' where they have 'GET THIS!'...changed the meanings of ordinary English words in order to Abuse & Rob ordinary members of the public!
They have set up yet another company called "The Law Society" to train up unscrupulous people in their methods of madness, lies and deception. Their commercial company which pretends to be the Government, keeps inventing new 'Statutes' which they 'pretend' are Laws (and are MOST DEFINITELY NOT) and they keep this game up by telling everybody that " THEY MUST OBEY THESE LAWS" and they have even subverted Police Men & Police Women into 'Police Officers' and convinced them that they have to enforce these Statutes.
The primary aim of these Statutes is to take banknotes, goods and property from members of the public who have not yet discovered that it is a scam being run 'secretly' against them. Many Police Officers are probably themselves ignorent of the fact that Statutes are purely optional and NO 'Human' is actually bound by them.
SO what you decide to do is entirely up to yourself. You can continue to give away most of your income to fund people who want to take, harm & steal from you OR you can decide to step 'outside' this corrupt system we are almost forced to be living in, and stop paying these people.
ALL humans are born equal, so there is nobody who has the RIGHT to order you around, unless you agree to give them that right (By Consent) Acts & Statutes can be given the 'FORCE' of Law, only with Consent. SO DO NOT CONSENT.
The choice is yours to make BUT Knowledge is Power - UK has already made that choice, and that choice is FREEDOM from a Government that cant GOVERN.
SO THERE YOU HAVE IT! - Knowledge is Power - UK."
APRIL 23 2017 Visiter No.643500 to mike/ann's www.opg.me ADVICE FROM AFAR ABOUT CITIZENSHIP FRAUD
Anna von Reitz
How to Correct Your Political Status and Why
Chances are you aren't obligated to be considered any form of federal Municipal CITIZEN nor as a federal Territorial Citizen, but you have been entrapped in a profit-making scheme that pretends that you have knowingly and willingly agreed to act as a volunteer federal employee--- specifically, as a "Withholding Agent" -- a Warrant Officer in the Merchant Marine Service, and that you have purposefully and knowingly enrolled in the Social Security program which is only available to federal employees in order to receive benefits from the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) which was organized in the wake of the Civil War for welfare relief of former plantation slaves.
What? You never worked a day for the federal government? You were never told that "Social Security" is only for federal employees and dependents? You aren't a former plantation slave? You never got any benefits?
Well, then, you have to stop calling yourself any kind of "US citizen" --- because citizens all work for the government. They have a duty and obligation to obey every statute, code, and whim of the government as a result, and they are also liable to pay federal income taxes. You also have to stop voting in any "US elections" including "State of State" elections, because the States of States are just local franchises of the federal corporation(s) defined at 28 USC 3002 (15).
So, Step One--- withdraw and rescind any and all applications and enrollments as a "registered voter". You have no natural interest in the elections of a foreign corporation that you don't work for, right?
If you don't get a paycheck direct from the federal government and you don't want to function as a for-free Withholding Agent and aren't interested in any "benefits" that you pay for yourself and don't want to be held subject to the whims of a foreign entity that is supposed to be providing you with Good Faith Service instead-- then read on.
You have been mis-characterized and defrauded and you have prima facie evidence of that readily available. You think of it as your Birth Certificate, but it isn't. It is a "certification" that a federal MUNICIPAL "PERSON" was created and named after you and that at one point in your life you were a real American. You were born on your birthday, but the MUNICIPAL PERSON has a birth date which is several days or weeks later---the filing date shown on the certificate.
Please note that the "Birth Certificate" is printed on bond paper. It is a security instrument. Please also note that it has been signed by the Registrar --- an officer of the probate court. This is prima facie evidence that your earthly estate was probated when you were only a few days or weeks old and that it was seized upon by the State of ___________ or STATE OF_________ and operated for its benefit from that time on.
So, Step Two---- ditch the federal MUNICIPAL PERSON and the responsibilities and obligations associated with it.
You need to get the Birth Certificate authenticated if that is still possible in your state, or certified, if not, and then you need to endorse it and "surrender" it to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
(Please note the two dots between the "U" and the "S"----- the U.S. Treasury.) and make Steven T. Mnuchin the Fiduciary responsible for IT.
The endorsement is simple but exact. The authenticated or certified Birth Certificate that the birth State Secretary of State sends back to you will have a cover page riveted or hard stapled and firmly attached to the front of the BC. You leave that cover page attached and on the front of the BC itself in the upper left hand corner and in red ink you write: "Accepted by Drawee" and sign it by: Your Upper Lower Case Signature, and date it.
Then turn the BC over and on the back anywhere write: Pay to the Order of the United States of America, U.S. Treasury. Without Recourse. And again, write--- by: Your Upper and Lower Case Signature, and date it.
Next comes the Form 56, which is the IRS Form called "Notice of Fiduciary Relationship". This is your Notice to Mr. Mnuchin that you are making him and his office responsible for the PERSON named after you.
The Form 56 is very simple -- the name of the PERSON is the NAME on the BC which you are returning to the Treasury.
The name of the Fiduciary is Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury. You can look up the address online. I believe it is 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220.
Section A (f) --- "Other" -- Public Commercial Trust Administration
Section B(4) -- Check (a) (b) and (h) "Other" and just say, "All forms that may be necessary".
On the back, Part II, 7 (C) "Other" --- Surrender of federal "PERSON" to U.S. Treasury
On the back, Part III "Court and Administrative Proceedings" --- enter the name and address of the agency issuing the BC. The "date proceeding initiated" will be the File Date which is never your birthday, but a few days or weeks later. The "docket number" will be the State File Number on the BC. The time will be the time you were actually born, and the place of "other" proceedings will be "usa".
On the back, Part IV, "Signature" ---- you write the word "by" like a by-line to a newspaper story---- by: Your Name (Upper and Lower Case), Authorized Representative, and the date.
Underneath the Signature is a blank space. It is appropriate to say that you wish to be indemnified against claims or losses under the sovereign usa Private Registered Indemnity Bond AMRI00001 RA393427640US.
This is basically a bond posted in behalf of all the actual states of the Union and all the people living in those states insuring them against any further claims related to the MUNICIPAL PERSON(S) they have surrendered back to Mr. Mnuchin.
And that is that. You have now surrendered the MUNICIPAL "CITIZEN" back whence it came and you have insured yourself against any further claims or losses or charges brought against that PERSON.
Along with the Form 56 you should include a brief letter stating that it is your instruction to operate exclusively under 100% commercial liability and without benefit of any limited liability or other benefit of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT).
You are going to send this package of documents via Registered Mail to the Treasury. Each red and white Registered Mail label (available with instructions at all Post Offices) is unique and has an alpha-numeric identifier to track it. This includes a nine-digit number that is compatible with the federal system. As part of your assignment letter, instruct Mr. Mnuchin to open a Treasury Direct Account with that number and to please inform you when it is open for business. Also ask him to settle all debts and charges related to YOUR NAME and deposit the remainder and all other credits owed into the new Treasury Direct Account.
Thank him for his time and attention.
Well, that was a Royal Pain and you shouldn't have ever been entrapped and obligated by your employees in the first place, but now you have taken action to sever the presumption that you are volunteering to act as a federal MUNICIPAL CITIZEN, and nobody can say otherwise. From now on, "IT" is Mr. Mnuchin's problem and you are indemnified against any further claims or complaints related to "IT".
Step 3.... Notify both the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service at Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 480, Holtsville, New York, 11742-0480 and the Internal Revenue Office of the Commissioner, Room 3000, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20204-0002, that you have retired from all presumed federal service and you are revoking your election to pay federal income taxes effective October 1 of 2016. Send these Notices via Registered Mail, too. Save a copy and the mailing receipts and the Green Card Return Receipt Requested for your Eternally Done and Over File.
No more Voter Registration, no more obligation to file Federal Income Taxes and no Municipal United States PERSON for the US DISTRICT COURT -- that is, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT COURT to address.
That much is done and over.
But there's more.
You also have to rebut and return the allegation of Territorial United States Citizenship. You do this by recording an Act of Expatriation.
This is as simple as saying that your allegiance is to the soil of your native birth state, say, Louisiana, and that you act only as a private American state trading vessel and birthright member of the unincorporated private trade association doing business as The United States of America.
Now, no matter what kind of word-smithing and duplicitous redefining of terms that goes on forever afterward, no incorporated entity or franchise of any incorporated entity can claim that you are operating as a Foreign Situs Trust belonging to them or abandoned for their benefit---- which was FDR's fraudulent claim against Americans in 1933.
You have declared that at home you are living on the land and at sea your Name is an American vessel engaged in international trade--- not subject to federal regulation of commerce and owed all the protections of the actual Constitution and treaties backing it.
So now they have no grounds to "presume" that you are a Territorial United States Citizen, either.
X and X.
Finally, the rats have created "International Organizations" and run them "in your name". You need to seize upon these organizations and file liens against them. You do this using a UCC-1 Financing Statement Form. The organizations doing business as your FIRST MIDDLE LAST and FIRST M.I. LAST are the DEBTORS and your non-Territorial Lawful Trade Name (aka Christian Name-- First Middle Last) is the Secured Party. This is not a Notice of your interest, because you have already given plenty of public notice. You can lien these organizations directly by checking the "Non-UCC" claim in Box 6.
When filling out the UCC-1 Form be sure to write the names in the proper style. Everything related to the DEBTORS including USA should be in all capital letters. Everything related to the Secured Party should be Upper and Lower Case, except that for the Secured Party it should be "usa" --- the actual organic states.
And now, finally, you have provided your employees with a fistful of paperwork refuting all their lies and presumptions about you. They can no longer presume anything about your political status, except that it is private and that you are operating lawfully and without any obligation to them or their organization. Quite the opposite--- they are in fact your employees and obligated to you.
Your final stop should be the State Secretary of State's Office to present him with another copy of "your" authenticated/certified BC.
I want you to stare that man or woman right in the eye and say: "This is prima facie evidence of a Public Trust....."
If necessary, continue on----- "and also prima facie evidence of intent to defraud."
"I have reclaimed my birthright political status and I want the proper passport I am owed. If you aren't authorized to issue it, get on the phone and find out who is."
If they attempt to drag you into one of their courts ask them where they will find the authority to address you? And where will they find a jury of your peers?
The Great Fraud is over.
The international trustees responsible for this Mess know that it is. You know that it is. It is just a matter of time before the whole world wakes up and goes---- WT.....?
APRIL 23 2017 Visiter No.643490 to mike/ann's www.opg.me WINSTON SHROUT SENT TO PRISON FOR TAX EVASION
This post serves two purposes one to address Winston Shrout being convicted in and Oregon Court yesterday and to address comments by one named SALLY ANN, who I have just blocked for rablerousing comments to may page stating I am harming people with the information I am making public.
Again this is a matter that comes down to establishing a clear line of facts and truth...
Where does one get facts and truths and who to believe and not to believe. I am not asking that anyone believe, I ask that people look to the facts and truths for themselves so they have a clear understanding of what it is they are doing before taking any action. This is why I so adamantly speak out about following gurus......
It is why when people ask me what the 1 2 3's are I hesitate in details because you have to know and understand what it is you are doing ....you have to make those decisions and doing so on the word of a guru is not smart.
What are the facts and truths and where might they be found.....The facts and truths lay in patents, copyrights, and trademarks....I can point to the facts and truths but you have to study and get it straight in your own mind.
Everything we are dealing is rooted in Intellectual properties and I can say this because I can show prove and demonstrate this. Winston was not to keen of Federal government, I am quite the opposite. The Federal government, Fiscal Services, Treasury, IRS, SEC, FINRA, CBP and other agencies are there to assist us if we come to them properly positioned.
Everything we are dealing with is rooted in Intellectual properties and I can say this because I can show prove and demonstrate this. I can lay down the patents that prove we were deceived into believing something other that what actually is. I can show how Trademarks have been used to conceal intentional trespass upon unregistered copyright. I can show how the Uniform Business Entities Act is the BAR playbook to unlawfully change our status so those who are intent on doing us harm can conceal accruing wealth trusts and accounts, and the procedure for 'domesticating' us when they decided to initiate wrongful foreclosure......oh and don't forget to destroy records if caught.....It is all right there spelled out in the Uniform Act.
I can show prove and demonstrate how the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act is used to force abandonment of property behind our backs through and by wrongful foreclosure which aligns perfectly to with Trust and indenture agreements of Wells Fargo, HSBC, Merrill Lynch that describes in explciit detail BAR attorneys take in fabricating 'will-be-debt opinions, how our signatures are forged onto fake and fabricated documents, and how the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act is to be utilized.
I can show prove and demonstrate through various trademark agreements and assignments how you and I gave permission as grantors and guarantor collateral for pleasures of legal representatives and their associates......that is damn near a quote as well......
I can show prove and demonstrate the MERS/NB is an intentionally concealed agreement of involuntary servitude and that MERS is completely misrepresented in the Fannie/Freddie mortgage loan documents.......This is an easy one to show, prove, and demonstrate........
I can show prove and demonstrate we have been deceived on a massive scale with more evidence than you can choke a chicken with......if this Sally Ann is attempting to make a case that I am giving legal advice or practicing law without a license, I say you are full of it because codes and statutes are not law rather a set of fixed administrative processes......
and what of court procedure.....is someone practicing law without a license by warning others that are no aware the court is a kangaroo admin process not a court of justice. .....If someone were to say that I am practicing law without a license by sharing truth and facts that the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over a wrongful foreclosure to which you were made to believe is a court of justice when in fact it is being concealed from folks that this all administrative and you are being denied first amendment rights, equal protection and due process by not being informed you have admin processes to exhaust because those who are licensed to practice law have blatantly lied.
We have a world that is upside down folks.......a world based on deception and lies.......it is disgusting and reprehensible...I get that folks are desperate for answers and remedy, but for God sakes do not blindly follow gurus like Winston Shrout, always always verify the facts yourselves - understand what you are doing, do not act on what others are doing otherwise.
I am confident the direction I am taking and admittedly yes advocating but I do not want for one minute someone to follow blindly without full understanding what and why you are doing you are doing. From where i stand these matters are not difficult, but i can say that with clear eyes and confident mind, because I have analyzed and studied this from every angle possible. And I do not like going into a dark cave without a torch to see my way.
Take for instance bonds and bills of exchange.....neither one I have ever been comfortable with and with the conviction of Shrout my suspicion has been confirmed. Shrout missed a couple of items related to trade and patents and that proved crucial, just as those who divorce themselves from the US Corp, yet still make claim to having assets held by the corporation they want not part of folks missed the 1790 Copyright Act......recognizing this act makes everything they are doing incorrect and in the wrong direction.......my opinion of course, you need to look for yourself and either find agreement or not ....
Winston screwed up, in my learned opinion, using the wrong form of instrument.....not bills of exchange rather it should be bills of lading .....big big big big huge difference....
As for all the Sally Ann's out there, don't come onto my pages and accuse me of harming people by putting out facts and truths so they may learn HOW they have been harmed and how they may help themsleves from being further harmed.....If you are going to troll my pages at least do so with some intelligence and accusations that hold up to scrutiny......The people that visit and frequent my pages are not stupid, confused perhaps, but not stupid. while others are quite intelligent.....These are a great group of people whom I admire greatly for taking initiative to very complex issues........No I cannot answer everyone's questions and yes i sense the frustration of some, but I cannot possibly answer everyone's questions ....to this I rely on those who are gaining understanding to help others along.......
Know this though the light emanates from one direction one path and that is Intellectual properties through the doors of specific and certain federal agencies.......If this seems contrary to what many are believing ........i get it....as I once believed the same...until I learned what I had learned all these years was based upon deception........it is a conclusion that each individual one needs to arrive at themselves.....or not......
Ok. so this posting is more a mish mash of thoughts.....
APRIL 22 2017 Visiter No.643478 to mike/ann's www.opg.me KEN DOST PAINTS THE PICTURE
THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate
AUTHORED BY: kenneth-william: Dost - In propria persona, natural and Living man
This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material alteration and modification of the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument that jumps out of the 4 corners and into a world of demonic evil that sets out to destroy all living men, women, and children who were lured into its clutches
Imagine one day you went out and purchased a brand new Chevy Camaro. You did not purchase it to drive it but rather to park it for next 10-15 years for future investment reasons. So you drive it straight from the dealer to a storage warehouse - put a cover over the vehicle, lock the pulldown door and completely walk away, forgetting about the car for the next 10 or so years.
The years roll by until the day arrives you decide to crack open the door and drive out what is now a classic high sought after vehicle, that for all intents and purposes is a brand spanking new vehicle from the year 2015. So, you roll up the door and to your shock and horror your classic vehicle is filthy dirty....Not only are there dents on the hood, the bumper, and rear driver side quarter panel, the interior is worn, the engine is filthy and the odometer has a registered 182,569 miles.....
Furious, you come to find out that the manager that oversaw the storage facility the first 9 years your car was in storage had been renting out your vehicle for fees of which he pocketed.....Of course, that manager is no longer employed at the storage facility.
Liken this analogy to at least over 67 million mortgage loans to real property agreements; liken this to your own mortgage loan. While you believed you had ownership, others were leasing out the use of your collateral time and time and time again - earning fees, compensation, and bonuses by stealing the use of your collateral for which you received not a single nickel........As a worse slap in the face, after making millions upon millions off your collateral, these criminal banksters, brokers, and insurance agents default you, defame and assassinate your character, destroy your credit, your livelihood, leaving you penniless in endless debt and millions upon millions: homeless.
When a mortgage borrower puts pen to paper and signs the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument, that is to say, the mortgage loan agreement, the assumption is there is an approval for a mortgage loan, from a lender to purchase real property. The greater assumption is one steeped in paradigm and one of pride, achieving the ‘American Dream’ to which they can now call themselves a homeowner.
The 21st century reality however is the paradigm is dead; a mortgage to real property is nothing more than a legal fiction, a ‘pretend’ mortgage to real property. This was by the banksters along with the government’s intent and design, to make us believe in something that no longer exists. For what purpose, you say? The theft of all ownership of course, not just of the real property collateral, but all property, personal and intellectual, currently owned or that ever will be owned.
Our perception is the mortgage (Deed of Trust/Note) is immediately sold to an investment bank who aggregate the mortgage into a pool with other mortgages, establishing an SPE into which the pool is transferred and from which certificates are issued and sold to investors. -----True? Not entirely
The fact of the matter is that the originator/pretend lender does not actually sell anything, rather merely pledges the alleged loan, in other words, the alleged mortgage loan is 'held for sale'....It is ONLY upon default that the alleged mortgage loan's "first sale" actually occurs...Stated another manner, the Assignment of Deed of Trust is the first sale - that is too say the putting back together of title and note, which though in fact was never together to begin with because the 'option' to purchase the defaulted loan was sold before a borrower ever signed the documents.
The option holder (broker) has control of the note and may and does sell it time and time again.....Imagine making 1000 copies of the executed note, putting them in a box and shipping it off to Borders Bookstore. The box is unpacked, labeled with a price tag and put on the shelves for sale - no different from a copyrighted work...except in this case the mortgage is a derivative and the broker is the holder of that copyright derivative.
Ownership of copyrights can be transferred either by operation of law or by a written instrument. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a) (2000). Courts have interpreted "transfer by operation of law" to mean "transfers by bequest, bankruptcy, mortgage foreclosures, and the like." Taylor Corp. v. Four Seasons Greetings, L.L.C., 403 F.3d 958, 963 (8th Cir. 2005) (citing Brooks v. Bodes, 230.781 F. Supp. 202, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 1991))
As a matter of law, authors and owners of copyright immediately possess the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, perform, and display copyrighted works and to prepare derivative works based on them. The Computer Software Copyright Act of 1980 amended the Copyright Act of 1976 to include “computer programs.”
The Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument is a copyrighted work of a computer program which becomes a derivative upon the borrowers signing of the agreement. The banksters are thus unjustly enriching themselves many times over, selling an alleged mortgage loan they do not even own....The broker's future fees and compensation are realized upon default with the actual first sale, which he collects on with the liquidation of the collateral.
Stated another way:
-Derivatives were deregulated
-Derivatives are securities
-Derivatives are credit default swaps, Collateralized Bond Obligations (CBO), CMO'S, CDO'S, CDO SQ., RMBS, MBS, ABS, and whatever other financially engineered (patents and trademarks) these bankster, broker, insurance agent criminals can come up with
-The simplest form of a derivative is in the name of this page - A Copyright Derivative - which occurs when you place your signature upon the copyrighted Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument.
We the people were made reliant on false representations that the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument was 'personal property' thereby a negotiable instrument - UCC3
How can a copyright DERIVATIVE, a security, be both a negotiable instrument AND a security
The common logic is rather clear - We the people were lured into executing a 'basket of securities' of which are STOLEN from us because the one who controls the copyright derivative controls all our 'rights in property'
Not only have they stolen our real property collateral - they have thus stolen all our rights in property - real, personal, and intellectual which was derived our executing what we believed was a mortgage loan to real property (a negotiable instrument) but in fact and truth was a collateralized copyright.
In fact what consumers were lured into giving uninformed consent to is an installment lease to a future purchase; a presecuritized investment contract to which the consumer is the uninformed third party beneficiary, creditor, and entitlement holder.
Most notable, is a 1998 security agreement between Nationsbank (Bank of America) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. registered under the MERS intentionally and actively concealed Trademark found in the publicly accessible databases of the United States Patents and Trademarks Office ("USTPO").
Borrowers were intentionally misled to placed their signatures upon the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument –MERS with representation MERS was just a registry, which states:
¶Borrower understands and agrees that MERS' holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling this Security Instrument.
¶Provides "MERS" is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. MERS is a separate corporation that is acting solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns. MERS is the beneficiary under this Security Instrument. MERS is organized and existing under the laws of Delaware.
¶Provides - The beneficiary of this Security Instrument is MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) and the successors and assigns of MERS’.
What borrowers were not told was they were agreeing to a licensing agreement and not a mortgage loan to real property. They were agreeing to give up all ownership to property (real, personal, and Intellectual) or more specifically agreeing to act as a "LICENSEE OF INFORMATION" under the laws of the Commonwealth of the State of Virginia per terms under an intentionally concealed security agreement between Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Nationsbank (Bank of America).
As such under Virginia law § 59.1-501.2(15) Defines a Consumer as
“[a]n individual who is a licensee of information or informational rights that the individual at the time of contracting intended to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. The term does not include an individual who is a licensee primarily for professional or commercial purposes, including agriculture, business management, and investment management other than management of the individual's personal or family investments.”
As such under Virginia law § § 59.1-501.2 (41) (42) (43) as to licenses:
(41) "License" means a contract that authorizes access to, or use, distribution, performance, modification, or reproduction of, information or informational rights, but expressly limits the access or uses authorized or expressly grants fewer than all rights in the information, whether or not the transferee has title to a licensed copy. The term includes an access contract, a lease of a computer program, and a consignment of a copy. The term does not include a reservation or creation of a security interest to the extent the interest is governed by Title 8.9A. [8.9A is Oregon §ORS79 – Secured Transactions]
(42) "Licensee" means a person entitled by agreement to acquire or exercise rights in, or to have access to or use of, computer information under an agreement to which this chapter applies. A licensor is not a licensee with respect to rights reserved to it under the agreement.
(43) "Licensor" means a person obligated by agreement to transfer or create rights in, or to give access to or use of, computer information or informational rights in it under an agreement to which this chapter applies. Between the provider of access and a provider of the informational content to be accessed, the provider of content is the licensor. In an exchange of information or informational rights
, each party is a licensor with respect to the information, informational rights, or access it gives.
Is it not time to dispose of the deception and deceit that has ravaged the residents of this state, and the citizens of this nation? Is it not time to wake up the fact that the residents of this state, yourself include and your family, have been targets of a mass grand larceny. How much more must we suffer the illegal acts perpetrated upon us by a crooked federal government, its agencies, banksters, brokers, and the insurance sector? How much more do we endure a court system that ignores the rule of law?
APRIL 19 2017 Visiter No.643374 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THINGS ARE GETTING INTERESTING
Anna von Reitz 11 hrs ago 18th of April
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
P.O. Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands RE 162 243 478 US
We are facing a crisis in the long process to restore lawful government to the actual United States and continue to suffer false claims and insupportable, outlawed practices which the so-called Territorial United States and Municipal United States corporations have been attempting to foist off on the actual states and people.
On May 1, 2017, they propose to set up a deliberate fraud scheme to attack and defraud millions upon millions of innocent people utilizing the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico as a base of operations. This has been done before as part of the fraudulent 1930’s bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc., and is apparently being done in preparation for a similar fraud scheme related to the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES, INC. The scheme has been prepared for by the Obama Administration and is apparently being carried through by the Trump Administration.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a member of the Territorial United States organization, is bankrupting its primary electrical utility corporation. This in itself is hardly worthy of mention on a global scale and would occasion little comment or concern, except that Mr. Obama created millions of purported “franchises” which are supposedly stand as sureties for this particular Puerto Rican public utility.
These “franchises” are all identified using alphabetic ACCOUNT designators that appear to be the names of living Americans--- for example, Alfred T. Krebs or ALFRED T. KREBS. It isn’t certain yet whether they will attempt to use Glossa against our Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation issued last May or not, but their intention has been clearly stated in the press. A copy of the Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation has been included in a letter (copy also attached) to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions.
When unsuspecting Americans receive bills addressed to these foreign public transmitting utilities, they pay them under the false assumption that these bills are legitimately addressed to them. The actual bills are already being paid out of the U.S. Treasury, so the perpetrators pocket the difference and say that these additional payments are “donations” and “gifts”----but are really the fruits of unjust enrichment, extortion, racketeering, and fraud committed by employees against their trusting employers.
It is international mail fraud, international identity theft, and involuntary conscription amounting to international slavery and racketeering being implemented via similar names deceits and the illegal and prohibited use of Glossas and false names. Please note that these Accounts/ACCOUNTS which use middle initials are not even legal names for lack of specificity.
This is also constructive fraud on a massive scale which has been prepared with malice aforethought by foreign governmental services corporations operating as crime syndicates on our shores. The essence of the crime is clearly established. They kidnap, press-gang, and coerce Americans to sign up for programs that only US Territorial or US Municipal employees are eligible for, then falsely claim that these people are “voluntarily” functioning as either Territorial or Municipal “citizens” and are then subject to their private corporation statutes, regulations, and codes.
Mr. Jeffrey Sessions, functioning as the U.S. Attorney General, has been given full warning with regard these deliberate anticipated crimes on our shores as well as a copy of our Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation which was also sent to you last May.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
cc: Letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions (two pages)
Copy of Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation/May 31 2016 (two pages)
Anna von Reitz
12 hrs ·
Business Letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions
April 18, 2017
Mr. Jeffrey Sessions, U.S. Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Dear Mr. Sessions:
I am writing this afternoon ---the 242nd Anniversary of the “Shot heard round the world”---regarding three areas of immediate and urgent concern: (1) the continued forced, fraudulent and inadequately disclosed enrollment of American state nationals in Social Security programs intended exclusively for Territorial United States and Municipal United States citizens and (2) failure of the Territorial and Municipal United States to come to an agreement with the actual land jurisdiction United States regarding proper identification of American state nationals and American State Citizens v. United States Citizens v. citizens of the United States on passports and other international and interstate IDs and (3) the pending bankruptcy of the Puerto Rican Electrical Utility and the fraudulent creation of millions of purported “franchise” public transmitting utilities operated under ACCOUNTS that are deceptively similar in appearance to the names of Americans.
The pretense that people are knowingly volunteering to serve as Withholding Agents, that is, Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service, to help win WWII ran out of steam in September 1945.
The continued international racketeering aimed at deliberately misinformed Americans and their enrollment in “Social Security” under these patently false presumptions of federal employment and Territorial and/or Municipal citizenship have to end immediately. The Territorial and Municipal Government organizations have been under Notice for going on two years. The longer you wait to admit the circumstance and release the adhesion contracts the worse it gets--- and the more people are harmed.
Ditto the situation with passports. The American people are owed competent passport service, but they are being routinely misidentified as United States Citizens and/or citizens of the United States as a result of having been improperly and unconscionably enrolled and conscripted under conditions of fraud as U.S. Territorial and/or U.S. Municipal citizens.
As you are aware, it is illegal to use “legal names”. As you should also be aware, it was never the intention of American states nationals to operate in commerce. Instead, another false presumption was foisted off on us by the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration which sought to “redefine” our lawful American Trade Names as U.S. Foreign Situs Trusts so as to palm off the debts of the private, mostly foreign owned “United States of America” Inc. onto the American states and people by an undisclosed process of hypothecation, fraud, and assumption of debt we never owed.
That boondoggle ended in 1999. Trillions of dollars-worth of labor and assets were siphoned out of this country as a result. Let me suggest to you that there isn’t going to be a re-run of it.
We aren’t putting up with any more “government” racketeering or fraud.
Tell your Boss. Tell the members of the feckless, treasonous, disgusting Congress.
They need to drop the whole plan of bankrupting all those purported public transmitting utilities NAMED after JOE Q. PUBLIC Americans and stop hypothecating debt against all those illegal, unlawful, non-specific, but deceptively similar ACCOUNTS that appear to be our names, and stop sending fraudulent bills through the U.S. Mail.
Tell Mr. Trump--- “NON-ASSUMPSIT” in very large letters. Tell the COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO its electrical utility will have to go bankrupt like any other mismanaged corporation on Earth.
While you are at it, get ready for all the homebound Americans who are now wise to the scam, returning to the land jurisdiction and surrendering all those millions of bogus U.S. PERSONS that were created by the UNITED STATES, INC. back to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Also be aware that we seized upon the derelict United States of America, Inc. that we bailed out of bankruptcy and paid off and which is ours and when we did so, we also took all 50 American land jurisdiction States with it and rolled the whole enchilada back into our actual land jurisdiction state trading companies. Look at the extractions on file and made part of the public record.
All the States of __________ and STATES OF ___________ belong to the ____________States and the __________States belong to the united States of America which belongs to the States which belong to the actual states and people of this country.
It’s over, Mr. Sessions. The Great Fraud that began with the so-called “American Civil War” is over. The Territorial and Municipal “United States Congress” members need to get their paws out of our pockets and start paying attention to those nineteen enumerated services we are owed, including the national trust indenture owed as the Preamble of that old, musty, dusty original equity contract called The Constitution for the united States of America.
Beyond that, if Mr. Trump needs money to continue operations, he doesn’t need to borrow any debt from the Israelis and he doesn’t need to borrow credit from the Rothschilds. He just has to realize where the actual money and credit has gone and assist us in our efforts to recover the assets that are owed to us. He will have all that he needs to operate the governmental services corporations. Free and clear.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
Anna von Reitz
15 hrs ·
Red Alert! Another Territorial United States Bankruptcy Fraud Scheme in Progress! Please Post Public Notices!
Americans----- another Territorial United States "National" bankruptcy FRAUD is in progress and coming at you!
On May 1, 2017, an international day of Communist celebrations and also a Satanic festival, it is the stated intention of the "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" (INC.) to declare bankruptcy and turn over its Puerto Rican Electrical Utility to international bankruptcy courts and bank-appointed trustees. There is just one little problem. Mr. Obummer created and named millions of public transmitting utility franchises of this bankrupt Puerto Rican Electrical Utility to stand as sureties for its debts. And they are all named, nominally, after living Americans.
Remember how the vermin mischaracterized your estates as ESTATES named after you, so that "John Allen Dunn" became "JOHN ALLEN DUNN"?
Well, now the limey cretins are trying another trick. They are trying to redefine and rename JOHN ALLEN DUNN as JOHN A. DUNN --- a purported franchise standing as surety for their bankrupt Puerto Rican Transmitting Utility.
Please note that "JOHN A. DUNN" isn't even a legal name. It is no name at all for lack of specificity. Is that "JOHN ALLEN DUNN"? Or "JOHN AMBROSE DUNN"? Or "JOHN ALLISON DUNN"? Or, or, or.....?
I am bringing judgment to the World Court concerning this blatant attempt to defraud Americans and I am writing to Attorney General Jeff Sessions to protest this fraud upon the bankruptcy court.
What I want all of you to do as your part of the effort--- those who can afford to do so --- immediately put advertisements in the "legal section" of your local newspapers as shown below and upon publication, send a copy of the ad along with the name and address of the newspaper and the publication date to me at: Judge Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle, Anchorage, Alaska 99652.
***** NOTICE OF NON-ASSUMPSIT*****
What appear to be names in the form JOHN A. DOE are not names, but Puerto Rican ACCOUNTS belonging to franchises of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electrical Utility operated by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (INC.). All such ACCOUNTS are pre- paid in full by Payment Bond AMRI00003 RA 493427653 US on file with the Vatican Chancery Court.
All re-flagged American Trading Vessels dba under lawful names in the form John Adam Doe operated by the United States of America and its land jurisdiction states operating in undelegated international jurisdiction are now under the beneficial ownership of the united States of America and are indemnified under sovereign private registered indemnity bond AMRI00001 RA 393427640 US on file with the U.S. Treasury.
Any billing statements issued to names in the form John A. Doe or JOHN A. DOE are illegal and unlawful and are in violation of United States Public Law and are an illegal conveyance of grammar. No payment, credit, or debit issued in response to such an improper
solicitation may be considered an assumption of that debt nor that identity and no legal or punitive action may be taken against anyone for failure to pay or perform any action is response to such solicitation.
The COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the UNITED STATES (INC.) and United States (Inc.) are hereby given NOTICE/Notice of these facts and are prohibited from seeking bankruptcy protection under false pretenses, hypothecating debt against American state nationals, making false claims of surety-ship related to American Trading Vessels, or otherwise promoting fraud and racketeering on our shores.
Notice Posted by: The American States and People
c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle
Anchorage, Alaska 99562 *****
This, and writing letters to the US Attorney General and President Trump, are the most effective actions you can take to prevent and forestall another attempted "national" bankruptcy fraud scheme of the Territorial United States aimed at the American states and people.
APRIL 15 2017 Visiter No.643258 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THE CASE of LEN LAWRENCE Thank you Mike,
I was directed to Action Fraud by a Metropolitan Police, Detective Chief Superintendent. Thereafter, The Deputy Head of Action Fraud, a Metropolitan Police Officer with over thirty years service, identified offences of fraud and other more serious offences, including perjury, that
had been covered up by a few officers within Thames Valley Police.
Action Fraud instructed Devon and Cornwall Police to take a statement from me in 2013, that statement has still to be taken! I was visited at home by The Manager, Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police, who was accompanied by a detective constable. I was told that
because I have a brain injury special arrangements would be made to take a statement from me.
What occurred is Neil Blackhurst, Devon and Cornwall Police, telephoned Det Insp Gavin Tyrrell, Thames Valley Police, and thereafter
no statement was taken from me. It was also not in Devon and Cornwall Police interest to take a statement from me as Det Supt Claire
Armes, Force Intelligence Officer, Devon and Cornwall Police, had knowledge that a false entry had been placed on a police log by
WPC Emma Pack. WPC Emma Pack had falsely alleged to have visited me at home in Devon. Det Supt Claire Armes took no action.
The IPCC Internal reviewer Lesley Hyland attempted to cover up WPC Emma Pack and other police officers actions, but failed.
Why did the IPCC fail in their cover up? Firstly, someone in Devon and Cornwall Police released to me internal police files. Secondly,
on the day WPC Emma Pack falsely alleged to have visited me the now former Head of a Constabulary's Special Branch and former
member/s of 14 INT had been with me all day. Why were these people at my home ? Answer, in 2013 as an ex-servicemen
(Royal Navy) my government had left me with no money to buy food, clothes, or to live.
We now know in February 2013 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, had been told by Mrs Justice Pauffley
to send my case to the Court of Appeal. A government lawyer did not what this to happen. I was falsely accused of fraud and a cost order of £8000 was placed upon me with no rights of appeal. A request had also been made to the Metropolitan Police to investigate
me and make life difficult for me. A detective from a Specialist Operations Unit, Metropolitan Police, contacted me and named the
Government Lawyer that had made the request. A file on this lawyer and his fiancé, surveyor Catherine Collins, was sent to me.
In my case Action Fraud, City of London Police, had been proactive and helpful. The former Head of Thames Valley Police, Special
Branch, Det Ch Supt Gilbert Houalla, is refusing to communicate with me. Det Ch Supt Gilbert Houalla now has responsibility for SAFEGUARDING. Is he being silenced ?
At the Mental Capacity Conference on the 30 March 2017 an attempt was made by a visitor to the conference to silence me by
trying to stop my presentation early, after the slide titled Not a chimney fire. The visitor has been identified together with their
association with others. The most appropriate means of addressing this is to publish the slides, they include Gulf War fMRI brain
scans and my case files damaged by lawyers that were withheld by Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors from the Court of Appeal and Court
To end on a positive point, the Court of Protection legal department referred certain issues to the Judicial Office for England and
Wales. The Judicial Office for England and Wales identified that all judges that made court orders upon me were not authorised
Court of Protection judges at the time they made their orders.
ps Thank you Mike for your and your mum's kind offer to help me in 2013 with some were to stay.
Sent: 13 April 2017 09:26
To: 'Len Lawrence - Poisoned Air Pilot'
Cc: 'Action Fraud'; 'len lawrence';
Subject: RE: [New post] When Criminals rule our lives: with
Len I am copying you in to Action Fraud
Holly Kiff @ The Frauddesk of The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau
City of London Police, 21 New Street, London, EC2M 4TP - 0207 601 6761
Ref ann:clarke & mike:clarke
FRAUD OFFICE ref no Net 6563898002702 - Action Fraud report NFRC170301793603.
THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:
1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and
2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and
3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and
4. The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and
5. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and
6. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This includes the dead legal fiction non-human “PERSON” that corporate-governments rules and regulations are written for.*] Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and
7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a “resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your “passport” the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the government and its agents as a “Court of Guardians”. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court);
8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government employee” just by attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by “invitation” to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared”; and
9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate); and
10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful” judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of “true” executor and has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim; and
11. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and
12. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead or plead “not guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you.
APRIL 8 2017 Visiter No.643065 to mike/ann's www.opg.me WAKEY WAKEY TIME FOR CHANGE
RE: YOUR Letter from the Official Solicitors Office
Fao molly:mcgrath McGrath, Molly (OSPT)
Attached is a defaced unaccepted letter that is full of inperfections and mistakes!
Are you qualified to act in this capacity?
I do not carry a title ie MR. as this is the legal fiction joinder routine YOU use to ENSLAVE to YOUR JURISDICTION
My name is not 'mike rake' either, perhaps you need to read some paperwork before plundering around with vague replies which is exactly what judges are doing.
My name is mike: clarke alive in law! NOT LOST or DEAD!
MASTERMAN v LISTER I have never heard of, WHAT IS THIS exactly or is it just another of your incompetant mistakes?
If your incompetence refers to the harbin v masterman enquiry then the judge here again had no jurisdiction to ask for such an enquiry under the terms of my mothers living will! Attached here http://opg.me/will20082012.pdf Correction 4
I do not need to return to the UK to serve any prison sentence what so ever, as the administrator 'judge' PELLING, a nominated Court of Protection 'Judge', not only judged in his own cause - ILLEGAL! UNLAWFUL! Ultra virus VOID damages required! BUT was served several formal NOTICES rebutting his presumed authority after which he had my representatives removed from court by intimidation!
Perhaps again you need to do some research on FRAUD on and IN the court by BIAS CONFLICT 'Judges' acting Ultra Virus as a FRAUD in their own cause and so the sentence is VOID and damages are demanded!
In fact YOUR entire operation is a FRAUD and YOU know it!
FACT - i man mike: a living sentient being are in FACT the executor of me and also of ann both of which DO NOT COME UNDER YOUR FRAUDULENT activities and demand to know what charges financially have you placed upon ann's property and land registry that IS A FRAUD!
mike: clarke alive in law NOT LOST or DEAD! or for that matter ENSLAVED either!
From: McGrath, Molly (OSPT) [mailto:Molly.McGrath@offsol.GSI.GOV.UK]
Sent: 07 April 2017 12:51
Subject: Letter from the Official Solicitors Office
Dear Mr Rake,
Please see the attached response to your letter dated 26th March 2017.
Complaints Officer / Executive Assistant to the Official Solicitor
Official Solicitors Office
30-34 Kingsway, London
DX: 141423 Bloomsbury 7 LETTERS FORWARDED TO FRAUD OFFICE
APRIL 6 2017 Visiter No.642990 to mike/ann's www.opg.me A FLAVOUR of DISCUSSION from the INTERNET
CAN EVERYONE PLEASE COPY AND REPOST THIS STATUS. DON'T SHARE IT. THANKYOU.
Massive Manhunt Launched for “Hero Mum on the Run"
More Than 100 Police Officers Searching 24/7
Another Mom Flees Cover Up of Sexual Abuse by Family Court
Join The Women’s Coalition Protest
UPDATE: The crowdfunding page for Samantha was court-ordered to be taken down. Family Court will also likely try and get this post taken down and put The Women's Coalition and its Executive Director, Cindy Dumas, in Facebook jail for revealing a cover up of sexual abuse in Family Court--It won't be the first time. Hopefully Facebook will respect freedom of speech and press and allow this post to remain, and side with the people instead of the power elite this time.
"An investigation into the circumstances is well under way and we have a large amount of resources working around the clock to locate Dylan and Louis.
- Superintendent Rich Fretwell, Nottingham Police Dept.
"The Nottinghamshire Police have been arresting and threatening various members of Samantha's family and also threatening her mother's friends. It's just been a heavy-handed witch-hunt."
- Friend of the family's
“Are the police on the wrong side of justice in the hunt for Samantha Baldwin? Isn’t she a hero mum trying to protect her boys?...The scandal which lies behind the case of hero mum, Samantha Baldwin, concerns a network of abusers linked to @gmpolice…Story behind this story is absolutely huge (Savile/Heath scale)...This fight ain't over yet. Down but not out. Journalists will continue to work hard on this vitally important story. It's a legal minefield.”
- Tweets by Journalist Richard Carvath (before gag order)
On Monday, the 27th of March, Samantha Baldwin and her 2 sons, Louis (9) and Dylan (6), went missing from Nottingham…Those of us who know Samantha, know that she is a kind and caring person, and we also know the circumstances leading to her taking the drastic action of disappearing.
In 2014 the boys disclosed details of horrific [sexual] abuse to their mother. Samantha and her children have been let down terribly by the legal system and Samantha found herself in the situation of being forced to allow the person she knows to have abused her children, access to them. She has refused to do this and is protecting her sons [by fleeing] despite the consequences.
- Rebecca, friend of Samantha’s
JOIN the PROTEST: COMMENT, REACT, SHARE!
The Women’s Coalition is protesting the cover up of sexual abuse which led to the removal of Samantha's children from her and the manhunt for Samantha by the police headed by Superintendent Rich Fretwell. Feel free to leave some choice words of outrage for them and words of support for Samantha and her family.
The following account was provided by a reliable source:
1) Louis (then aged 7) disclosed to his grandmother and mother that he and his brother (Dylan, aged 3) have been systematically sexually abused by their father and other men.
2) Samantha reported this to the police (GMP) who interviewed Louis and Dylan in a draconian manner in a small room in a police station in Middleton, Manchester. Police personnel at this time are dismissive and highly unprofessional and inappropriate towards distraught Mother and Grandmother.
3) The police did not believe Samantha or her children.
4) GMP [Greater Manchester Police] investigating officers make strong suggestions and comments at the time that the perpetrator was ‘innocent'. Comments were made to indicate that he was a businessman and upstanding citizen so how could he be a child sex offender(??)
5) Samantha and the family tirelessly requesting samples be taken immediately from the boys to test for possible drugs. This was ignored and only then agreed to test at a much later date.
6) The above evidence was ignored and CPS takes no further action.
7) In fear, Samantha then moved area, she moved to another part of the UK.
8) Samantha's own father is manipulated by the abuser, he then gave the perpetrator Samantha’s address.
9) The perpetrator goes to The Family Court demanding custody.
10) A court appointed social worker visits the perpetrator’s family with a view to placing the children there.
11) The judge rules Samantha’s children are to be taken as ward of the court.
12) Samantha’s mother and sister were then arrested this week and held in custody and questioned for 30 hours.
From another credible source:
"The evidence consists not only of what the boys themselves told their mother and grandmother but also lab tests by the police which showed that the boys' hair contained evidence of drugs used to sedate them. The lab test results showed that both boys had been drugged with benzodiazepines and zolpedem. In addition a medical doctor found that the eldest boy had contracted "molluscum contagiasum". This was only on his anus and buttocks. This problem can be contracted by sexual contact."
The Women’s Coalition is not linking to any of the mainstream media stories on Samantha’s case because they all are reporting from the court’s/father’s perspective. As usual, they are going along with the agenda to maintain paternal entitlement, especially in sexual abuse cases. However, you can google Samantha Baldwin and comment in support of her.
Samantha’s mom and sister were arrested on suspicion of helping her, but have been released on bail. The are being threatened with 4 years in prison for abetting the “abduction”. This is often done to terrorize the family, to deter other people from helping and put pressure on the mom to return. They tell the mom if she returns, her family will not be prosecuted.
Judge Lea put out a notice Friday that Samantha poses a risk of harm to her children, which serves the purpose of turning the public against Samantha and getting help to turn her in, and of justifying the massive police search: over 100 police searching 24/7. However, the real reason for the massive manhunt is twofold: 1) capturing women who defy paternal power and control are prioritized over real criminals and 2) women who try to protect children from sexual abuse by fathers are a major threat to the systemic permission for paternal sexual assault.
On Monday, Judge Lea ordered Samantha’s boys be wards of the state: i.e. in foster care. It is common tactic for judges to place children who have reported sexual abuse by their father temporarily in foster care as an interim step in switching custody to the father.
President of the Family Court, James Munby, promised he would make family courts more transparent and, therefore less corrupt, but it has not happened. He can start with lifting the gag order on Samantha's case. Here is a similar case he helped cover up abuse: https://www.facebook.com/SafeKidsInternational/photos/a.404998956187025.89722.402177413135846/894180027268913/ You can email him to complain about Samantha's case: email@example.com
Mainstream media is aiding and abetting the cover up and terrible injustice occurring. It is horrible enough that judges disregard and cover up sexual abuse, but when the media, the fourth estate, which is the public’s only means to uncover corruption and bias when all three branches of our government goes along with the cover up, it is appalling. Social media must fill in the gap in covering these cases, so please share this post and any others that get the truth out.
Richard Carvath, is one journalist who has been exposing the truth in Samantha’s case, but was just gag-ordered yesterday and all his tweets had to be deleted, however it is believed he will be fighting the gag order, along with some other journalists. Gag orders are another common tactic used by family court judges in covering up sexual abuse and the unjust switching of custody to fathers. www.carvath.wordpress.com @RichardCarvath
KUDOS to the journalists who have been brave enough to report the truth about Samantha’s case, especially Richard Carvath.
Statement issued by Family Court in relation to alleged abduction case
Vicky Haigh's case: another UK cover up:
"I Won't Be Silenced"
UK Couldn't Silence Famous Protective Mom: Speaks Out from France
Imprisoned Twice for Speaking Out: Hasn't Seen Daughter in 4 Years
[Pictured: Samantha and boys (top); Superintendent Rich Fretwell (bottom left); Judge Jeremy Lea (bottom right)]
A letter from a victim of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATE court of protection in prison this week here by Peter Hofschroer which provides ample proof of the length these criminals will go to to cover up their frauds giving you an inckling of the level of BILLIONS involved.
MARCH 26 2017 Visiter No.642666 to mike/ann's www.opg.me The concealment of documents is fraud sect 3 of Fraud Act 2006 , to conceal documents the public are entitled to see , especially when they are under CPR rule 5.4 (2) ,and include all the papers filed before and after the claim commenced, what you see clearly is a BOGUS CASE,
Not in the system, private room jobs , Void Abinitio ....it never started ...all fiction..ffs
Sect 2 Fraud Act 206 Fraud by Abuse of position. ...bastards !!!
MARCH 26 2017 Visiter No.642665 to mike/ann's www.opg.me AVOID AT ALL COST THEIR CORPORATE COURTS by KEN DOST All it is administrative paperwork through several federal agencies...now before you freak out in emotional outburst 'I do not want a part of the the federal govt...they are out to screw us' sort of comments - hear, ponder, and reason....
You want to become a part of the US Corp...just not as a debtor (bond) ..you want to exchange your bond for shares of stock, thereby going from a debtor (bond) to a stockholder (creditor) --- than you either structure yourself the Corporation with charters etc etc and than create a disregarded entity LLC with a third entity being a holding company ...
or .....you become the bank.....and using fed and treasury to wash...
or......you become a federal contract private trust and keep treasury and other agencies as the bookkeeper ....
in all cases your have complete control over you and YOU and private......
there is a lot and I mean alot of paperwork and processes amongst agencies....think of it as navigating the matrix to safe harbor.....
the things I am speaking of are not UCC1 financing statements and birth certificates they are the nuts and bolts - dry as hell - forms, statements, account related transfers and setting up
I could have thrown some forms and probably been done with this and long away from here by now...BUT, I would have been silenced and I am not the sort that keeps quiet on matters, and I do not like throwing papers into a black hole, remedy or not, without knowing the knats ass details as to the where it derives.....
That problem is eliminated as I have tracked the entire paper route and just have to get it all sorted and organized and off FAcebook can sing all I wish without fear of being silenced either.
The force that drives all this theft and grand larceny and trespass and estate theft is expressly due to BAR attorneys...in all cases it is an attorney that is signing for us in one capacity or another....This does not mean you can do a blanket revocation of attorney does not work that way as it has to followed through with another appointment each one agency, exchange, insurance related......
Insofar as the BC is concerned ....well ......over the course of the next couple weeks we are gonna be doing some rephrasing so as to put in proper context .........From the side I am looking from now, which is nuts and bolts workflow and document handling and processing ...from this position looking back onto Kallenbach and gurus, including myself on phrasings.......we sort of look like we are crazy going on as we do on many of the things people rattle on about...
It is almost a let down to some degree because the way we go and on over all this conspiracy shit ...vatican, constitution rotchschilds birth certificates, you would expect a grand finale of some sort, and there is none......there is none of this fucking drama......it is just workflow premised one very important base point..
and it is not even legal fiction - life/death - living man/woman ....no the terms that actually apply and really the only one that runs consistent in the conversion employee/associate ......debtor/creditor
the remedy though is all admin....do whatever you can to stay out of court and buy time while this gets pulled together on this end ......the remedy is in reach and it is real
MARCH 26 2017 Visiter No.642663 to mike/ann's www.opg.me Retired US Judge Spills Beans
By Judge Dale 25 May 2012
PREFACE: STUFF YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW
I didn’t plan on writing PART 5 but given the global movement in play to collapse the fiat financial dominance historically created and controlled by the Vatican; European Royal and Elite plus the retaliatory efforts by the United States Corporation to recoup their control of America;
I felt a need to point out the flaws in their CORPORATE PROCESS. You probably identify with this CORPORATE PROCESS as LEGAL PROCESS but it really isn’t about what is legal or lawful because all process is about the enforcement of CONTRACTS or the imposition and enforcement of CORPORATE REGULATIONS called STATUTES.
The best advice you will ever receive is to: AVOID THEIR COURTS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
There is NO justice to be found in those courts unless you are a member of the Vatican; the royal or Elite, or have purchased Diplomatic Immunity.
The only Constitutional Court in America is the International Court of Trades, which was created because no Foreign Nation Government would trade with the Corporate United States, until they provided a way for these foreign Nations to enforce their Trade Agreements with America.
NOTE: Historically, the World Court was created to provide Nations with a venue to enforce their Trade Agreements but the Corporate United States refused the Courts invitation to participate because they were denied control over the Court.
All of the other American Courts are pseudo courts or fictions and simply are Corporate Administrative Offices designed to resemble Courts and all of their Judges are simply Executive Administrations designed to resemble Judges.
The purpose of these pseudo Corporate Courts are only to settle contract disputes and since George Washington’s government was military in structure; if either party refuses to participate, these Courts cannot become involved and the dispute is dead in the water!
My use of the term ‘dead in the water’ is not a canard because these pseudo Courts are unconstitutional Courts of Admiralty, the International Law of the Sea!
Which Public body??? Requested Official Solicitor?? so, let's get this little farce into perspective... the so called 'judge' decides to contact his BAR buddies ie the official solicitor to conduct a so called 'harbin v masterman' enquiry that effectively is NON-EXISTANT where the Official Solicitor then recruits a barrister BAR buddie Alexander Ruck Keene to give his opinion based on the so called 'judges' misleading picture of events, omitting to tell the barrister of the living will that he authorised. The barrister places a question mark over jurisidiction even without FULL DISCLOSURE and thus provides his cautious opinion... then the 'judge' proceeds to assume he has jurisdiction from his buddy ie Barrister of the BAR and intructs the Official Solicitor another member of the BAR to continue.. whom then takes 6 months to investigate providing ZERO nothing! AND then proceeds to lay financial charges that the judge authorises to be placed upon my mother's property.. ARE THESE PEOPLE FOR REAL??? SO there are charges placed on the LAND REGISTER against my mothers property that we have NOTHING for!!! THIS IS JUSTICE 2017??? Lets just say that the figure is £100,000 WOULD YOU PAY £100,000 FOR NOTHING???? Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Lord Acton
MARCH 24 2017 Visiter No.642586 to mike/ann's www.opg.me EMAIL to AMBER RUDD AND LIZZ TRUSS
MARCH 23 2017 Visiter No.642577 to mike/ann's www.opg.me LORD CHIEF JUSTICE RESPONDS here
MARCH 23 2017 Visiter No.642571 to mike/ann's www.opg.me EXAMPLE from Dave John Clapham Dear C Chambers
i write regarding case number ………………..
Without Prejudice i the living man :David-John the natural man, the representative for this legal fiction i do not stand as surety, security or accommodation party , i am the general executor of the account and will be attending Leeds Magistrates Court on April 4th 2017 by representing the strawman to challenge jurisdiction of the court and/or to stop any unlawful hearing of the account MR DAVID JOHN CLAPHAM charged.
i require the following information from you:-
1. i require you to identify the jurisdiction you are moving under?
2. is this a commercial charge?
3. Is this a civil claim?
4. Is it a criminal complaint?
5. i require knowing who you are and who you are representing in this matter?
6. i require to know who is bringing the claim?
7. by what right do you bring this claim?
8. Are you the injured party?
9. Do you have a power of attorney from the injured party giving you the right to bring this claim? Because without a power of attorney how can you bring the claim?
10. i require knowing how this liability was created?
i claim your proposed liability statement is not valid because
a) it’s not signed, b) there is no seal on it, c) there is no name of whoever wrote it.
Is it not true that the Criminal proceedings Act 1947 removed the crowns immunity from giving disclosure? this i believe means all questions asked have to be disclosed/answered
Take Notice i also require written confirmation of what you believe the definition of this charge is? Until then i cannot give you remedy until i know what this charge is; therefore please define the charge.
i accept all claims for value; and Conditionally accept based on proof of a proper claim
i also draw your attention to the following document APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO
OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS ON THE JURISDICTION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS here i require a response within (3) three days of receipt of this letter or i will presume that by tacit acquiescence that failure to respond will be taken that either you have dropped these charges or that these charges are false.
i look forward to your response
Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 il-Will Frivolity Without Recourse Non Assumpsit All Rights Reserved
MARCH 21 2017 Visiter No.642520 to mike/ann's www.opg.me INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO MY NAME CLAIMED & FILED
Dave John Clapham
16 hrs ·
Lord Chancellor Elizabeth Truss
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Conservative Party Theresa May MP
Dear Theresa May, Elizabeth Truss,
Michael Gove (Rt Hon) Theresa May (Rt Hon)
House of Commons House of Commons
NOTICE AND REQUEST
1) FRAUD UPON THE COURT
2) VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS
3) HOSTAGE POSITION
4) THEFT - Non Payment of Fees
5) Protection from Eviction and Harassment Act 1977
6) Abuse of Process (Common Law)
7) Contempt of Court
Michael Gove (Rt Hon) and Theresa May (Rt Hon),
RE:- Criminal Activities prevalent in the Civil and Criminal Justice System,
in England and Wales
Barnet Court – 3BT01335
False Warrant for Posession No –06389/14
Croydon County Court – Frant Rd – A02CR001
Harrow Crown Court – T20150305
Crime Report No. –2425281/14
Crime No – Theft/Fraud - 00147578
I am writing to you jointly, as the Secretary Of State for Justice, and Home Secretary, respectively, in matters
of malfeasance and maladministration, under your Honours’ responsibility, that amounts to criminality as :- “FRAUD ON THE COURT”, with the intention to place me, a law abiding man, and my family, in HOSTAGE, which resulted in affecting our right to enjoy our family life, freedom and peace.
I and my family are not a unique case, as this is a customary and widespread act, from which many many thousands of individuals and families are enduring consequences on a daily basis.
The matters referred to above, require an urgent investigation, to prevent the continued use of those methods, which are known under the “Gestapo Nazi” regime, Apartheid, and Zimbabwe.
The only way to satisfy the citizens, of Her Majesty’s jurisdiction, under which you have been appointed to ensure and secure, the people’s rights, sworn by Her Majesty the Queen, at her Coronation of 1953 “MAGNA CARTA” by ordering a public enquiry.
Further urgent action, shall be taken, to ensure, the simple requirement, that each branch under his Honour’s responsibility, as Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, AND the Police and Crown Prosecution Service shall ACT ONLY IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RULE OF LAW, and not in accordance with the culture that has been fed into the system, by unscrupulous dark forces and lobbyists, controlling the courts and law enforcement culture, of which it is widespread, adversely affecting many many thousands of law abiding citizens, who are living under the fear, of dictatorship, and a lawless society, taking the public HOSTAGE.
In support of the statements above, on which I take full responsibility, under the penalty of perjury, I am setting out below, the grounds on each of the points 1-6 above:-
1) FRAUD UPON THE COURT
An application for a Claim for Possession of my home was made in the Barnet County Court on October 21st 2013, by a David John Wood, of Lattey and Dawe Solicitors LLP on behalf of Kleinwort Benson (Channel Islands) Ltd.
No Fee was paid for the proceedings. No step can be taken without the Court Fee being paid.
This is clear evidence, that there are people in the court administration, willing to place false claims in front of a judge, bypassing the requirement, of the fee to be paid, and victims being “served” with purported court papers, which are not from the official court system, but from a SHADOW COURT.
No evidence whatsoever was presented, to support such a claim, which was in dispute. So “Honourable Judges” are adjudicating cases, fully in the know, that there is no properly constituted and paid-for claim in existence.
Furthermore, I’ve never been served with any claim for VACANT POSESSION of property, issued by the court.
I have never received a NOTICE OF ISSUE duly annexed with a Claim for Vacant Posession issued and Sealed by the court.
So we have bare-faced gangsters and thugs, with the full backing of the ignorant or complicit police, in the mass theft of homes, and the anihilation of the bewildered, law-abiding VICTIMS.
No Order for posession, isued by the court, exist in the court file.
Nevertheless, this purported direction hearing, is not reflected in the Computerised Court Records, suggesting that it was a private, shadow hearing, behind closed doors by colluding parties.
The Barrister for the bank, Mr Orenstein, snidely referred to me on several occasions, as “the litigant in person”, at a time when he himself was there on no lawful authority, having his fees added to my account in an act of collusion and Nelsonian Knowledge in a clear act of theft and RAPE.
There was never any judgement, upon which such an order could have been made in any case. Yet it is being used as a waepon of terror, fully backed by the police.
My numerous appeals on valid and lawful grounds, came to nothing, as several judges declared my claim as “being totally without merit”. Judge Stone threatened me with a Civil Restraint order, if I should appeal further, whilst seeing no flaws in a total FRAUD UPON THE COURT, FRAUD UPON MYSELF AND FRAUD UPON THE PUBLIC PURSE.
2) VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 5 Right to Liberty and Security
Article 6 The Right to a fair trial
Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life
3) HOSTAGE POSITION
a) My family and myself, have been held HOSTAGE by criminals operating, as set out in the attached document, FRAUD UPON THE COURT.
b) I have been threatened beyond my dignity, by the Licencesor (FCA), of my profession, based on Innacurrate, Misleading and False data, supplied by the Criminals as stated above.
c) The common thread in all these entities and the men and women who pull the strings, is that they are acting criminally, in unison, to protect an unwarranted stance , which could not prevail, without the collusion of these trusted and authorised agencies, acting to proliferate crime against the public, and denying it, gangland style.
d) I am the victim of firstly forgery. All the above have turned a blind eye. Secondly, theft by currency manipulation, same. Libor manipulation. Same. Fraud Act Concealement by lack of disclosure. Same. Denial of regulatory duties. Same. False claims at court. Same. Criminal raids upon my home and family. Same. False arrest.Same. False council Tax bills by colluding council officers of Barnet, Croydon and Ealing Cuncils. Same. False “Liability Orders” from Barnet Council, Ealing Council and Croydon Council. Same. False imprisonment. Same. False “sentencing”. Same. False threats from Equita abd Nwelyn PLC collection agents. Same.
e) Every single authority and body above, are acting to support the criminal stance, taken by David John Wood of Lattey and Dawe Solicitors, acting on behalf of the bank, Kleinwort Benson (Channel Islands) Ltd., who are fully authorised and regulated by the FCA, which have found them to be totally innocent and above board. The criminals, have never produced a single shred of evidence, in five years of dispute, to support any of their claims, and there has never been a single proceeding ISSUED BY THE COURT, upon which my family and myself have been deprived and terrorised beyond belief.
f) The coordinated attack upon us, to take our home, our property, our belongings, our business, is a calculated and Nazi-esque joined up effort, to proliferate hate crime, enrich criminals, and weaken us by attrition, so that we are not able to restore our position, and bring the criminals to justice.
4) THEFT - Non Payment of Fees
a) Claims are been put through the court system, with no fees paid for the proceedings.
b) In accordance to the rule of law (Protection of Eviction and Harassment 1977), Civil Procedure Rule (CPR), makes clear, that unless and until the fee, and the correct amount of fees, is paid NO STEP SHALL BE TAKEN. None of the claims or applications by the claimant, has been paid for.
c) The fact that the court fee has not been paid, is a fraud (THEFT), on the public purse, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.
d) Fraud on the individual, by debiting, and demanding, the court fee, which they did not pay, and legal expenses, on non-existing (fraudulent) proceedings, which amounts to an abuse of process.
e) These “fees” are routinely billed (CRIMINALLY) to the victim’s accounts. The court is missing millions in lost revenue. Unlawful cases are clogging up the judicial system, where justice is frustrated for the public, whilst criminals thrive. Court fees have had to be hiked in recent times, to the extent that many respectable members of the judiciary have resigned over this matter. The majority of victims, cannot now afford access to justice. In some cases, court fees have increased from £250.00 to £20,000 for the public to swallow, to subsidise criminality.
f) It is nauseous to imagine, that EVERY COURT up and down country, have officers, putting forward cases to the obliging judiciary, where NO FEE HAS BEEN PAID, in a criminal conspiracy by Banks and court staff, and the false documents will be used by the police to justify TERRORISM.
g) In my own case, no fees have ever been paid at any stage by the claimant, where a fee is required to be paid, which is clearly evidenced by the Computerised Court Records.
h) My case has been in the Barnet County Court, Croydon County Court, Central London County Court and other courts.
AT NO TIME, HAS THE CLAIMANT PAID A FEE FOR THE PROCEEDINGS.
i) Due to the collateral damage caused to the victims, their families and communities, who have to be looked after as the state picks up the pieces, in the form of emergency housing, bankruptcies and social security benefits,
THE CUMULATIVE BURDEN ON THE PUBLIC PURSE IS A MATTER OF BILLIONS.
5) PROTECTION FROM EVICTION AND HARASSMENT ACT 1977
a) These crimes, make it clear, that my family and I, have been deprived (NEVER EVICTED) of our home and property. At no time, were we, or our tenants, lawfully evicted by a County Court Bailiff, and we have never sold our home, nor have we authorised anyone to sell our home.
b) The same above applies to our income invested, tenanted properties where the lawful tenants were deprived by violence of criminal gangs, pretenting to act in official capacity, as officers of the court, without any jurisdiction, in fact and in law. Neither I nor my tenants, have ever at any time, been served with a WARRANT, or notice of eviction annexed with a lawful warrant issued by the Court, as required under the rule of law.
5) Abuse of Process (Common Law)
a) Upon a pretend claim for posession dated 21st October 2013, based on pretend arrears, a pretend “Order For Posession” was granted by District Judge Parfitt on March 14th 2014 at a pretend posession hearing at the Barnet County Court, based on a pretend Judgement which does not exist. My appeals received a pretend verdict “Totally Without Merit” , various pretend “warrants” were pretended to be “ISSUED BY THE COURT”. We had pretend bailiffs visit our home on various ocasions, with pretend police in support, who was there to pretend to keep the peace. They were unable to show their pretend warrant for vacant posession.
b) We had a pretend (re)posession on November 7th 2014. Pretend police officers threatened us on December 1st 2014, repeatedly stating “if a warrant was obtained fraudulently, we’re not interested” . We had a second pretend eviction on 12th December 2014. Police wasted our time and energies, by making pretend investigations over many months.
c) On December 23, 2014, Pretend County Court Bailiffs deprived my tenants at 1 Wren Court N20 0AF, with a Pretend High Court Writ, and took pretend posession of my property. On March 9th 2015, Manoj Gondhia and Joseph Papworth, acting as pretend High Court Sherriffs, criminally took posession of the said property, and the police confirmed them as verified and confirmed High Court Sherriffs, when they are only pretend.
d) “A high Court has no jurisdiction to issue any Writ for posession to deprive or evict an Occupier”.
e) The police chased me away, as the lawful owner and occupier, and threatened me with REAL violence. Again, both the Watford and Barnet police, issued crime numbers and promised investigations, but that was only pretend.
f) My son had a pretend arrest alleged based on his skin colour alone(released later without charge).
g) My Nephew Christopher was arrested, for theft in my house, when I did not report any such theft. It was only a pretend arrest, as there was a pretend buyer for my house, with a pretend bill of sale. He was not charged as it was only a pretend arrest, to assist a REAL theft.
h) I had a pretend arrest in my own home on April 1st 2015, as reflected at the land registry, even with a Fraud Restriction Notice on the title, which was handed to the pretend police (Sgt Peter Dearden) a matter of hours before. The police, with the duty to establish the law, via the legal department, which could not have been justified in any shape or form, to deprive or evict the OCCUPIERS.
i) In any event, as stated above, this is a mortgage (loan) issue, which cannot justify posession of an OCCUPIER.
j) I was made the victim of pretend charges for Trespass and Theft of Metal and damage to locks to my own REAL estate. I was released on pretend bail. I requested evidence in the Crown Court, and none was produced. There was a pretend warrant issued for my arrest, based on a pretend “failure to appear” at court, where I was in attendance as signed and witnessed by many.
k) A further pretend arrest was made on 13th May 2015 and I was locked in a REAL jail over three weeks, on a pretend Order of a Judge Anderson.
l) I faced further pretend trials, with pretend witnesses and pretend evidence. I even had pretend solicitors and Barrissters pretending to act for me.
m) We faced pretend court proceedings, with judges pretending to see evidence of pretend allegations, whilst being blind to the REAL land registry title.
n) The Jury was shown pretend evidence, which came from a pretend court, and I had a pretend conviction. My request for a mention had a pretend approval, and HHJ Greenwood ignored it, and passed a pretend sentence, based on a pretend pre-sentence report by Nekesha Robinson, who has REAL evidence of my innonce.
o) The court nor the Probation Service, have never been able to produce the pretend ORDER OF CONVICTION, sealed by the court as per the County Court Act 1984 s135. All they can produce, is a number of pretend documents such as a “certificate of Conviction” and a “Community Order” purported to be made up from and I quote “information from the file and the computer” .
p) Scarily, I have been taken back to court twice, and threatened with further imprisonment by HHJ Greenwood and others, for breaching a pretend “Court Order” when no such court order exist, and no such court order can exist. The alleged evidence was pretend statements form a Devi Parmar and Bhavesh Karia who both confirmed that no court order exist, and both failed to sign their pretend witness statements to support their allegations of breach of a pretend “court order”.
q) I made a REAL request to HHJ Greenwood on no less than twelve (yes twelve) occurences, to provide me with a copy of the order which I was allegedly on trial for breaching, and at no time, did he satisfy my request, in his fraudulent and pretend waffles.
7) Contempt of Court
a) I have lost count of the number of times, that myself, family and friends have been dragged into court, by criminals that you govern. Suffice to say, that on each and every occasion, there has been contempt of court, by the people dragging me there, and the people adjudicating. Conducting any trial in a court of law, where there is neither any evidence, nor credible witness, is contempt of court. Furthermore, to submit claims, which are clearly false, to submit inauthentic ‘witness statements’ not even signed, and to conduct make-believe proceedings in violation of the law and the statutory procedures, is contempt of court.
b) To omit evidence, threaten the accused, to have a trial without a statement or bundle from the victim, to manipulate the dates, times and scheduling of proceedings, to entrap and harrass the victim, is contempt of court.
c) For District Judge Parfit to ambush a directions hearing, and make an order, based on no judgement, nor disclosure, is contempt of court.
d) For Circuit Judge Cryan (Central London) to make a statement that I am a victim of Bank Fraud, and do nothing to curtail it, is Contempt of Court.
e) For the CPS to hound me down, when there is no evidence nor witnesses whatsoever that I had commited a crime, is contempt of court.
f) For Dipan Varsani, to fail to arrest David John wood, and those he work for, despite the evidence, is contempt of court.
g) To terrorise the victim of a crime, knowing full well, that the criminal has done wrong, and choosing to harrass the victim is contempt of court. For the police, namely Sergeant Purdy, Christopher Williams, Sergeant Sutherland, Benjamin Kovler, Peter Dearden and a host of others, to chastise the victim, instead of arresting or even question the criminal, is contempt of court.
h) If a party to the matter informs the FCA, that I pleaded guilty in a criminal court, to crimes, when this is not the case, it is contempt of court.
i) If a party to the matter, informs the HMRC, that I am serving a prison sentence, when this is not the case, it is contempt of court.
j) If the probation service is aware that there is no order issued by the court, upon which I can be sentenced, and they act upon a pretend order to restrict my liberty and freedom of movement, it is contempt of court.
k) If police officers attend several purported evictions at my home, and they are fully in the know, that no lawful instrument exist, upon which I can be evicted, and assist in a criminal raid to rob and deprive us, it is contempt of court.
l) If Barrister Oliver Wyeman makes a concealed appearance at court on my behalf, and agree to a Crown Court trial, without a defence case statement from me, nor any evidence, it is contempt of court.
m) If the prosecution presents court documents to the jury, which are not from the court, it is contempt of court.
n) If the police and the CPS (Ben Kovler, Christopher Carey, Dipan Varsani and others), and my purported counsel, conspire to hide the fact, that I am and was the owner, proprietor and equity holder of my home, in order to secure a false conviction, to assist David Wood to attempt to steal my property, with purported “vacant possession”, it is contempt of court.
o) If I, have to face a trial, for trespass, at at a property where I am the proprietor, owner and equity holder at the land registry, and I have not sold my property, and have never been evicted, it is, contempt of court.
p) If the jury was deprived of the land registry papers, showing me as owner, proprietor and equity holder, with a fraud restriction to boot, that is contempt of court.
q) If the court, and the probation service, are unable to show me a copy of the sealed order, for a sentence which they are compelling me to serve, it contempt of court.
r) If a judge (Greenwood), lies to me, that he will consider my mention bundle, with the above evidence, and then refuses to do so, and threaten me with imprisonment, it is contempt of court.
s) If a legal professional, commit crimes, and withold their indemnity insurance details, against the law, it is contempt of court.
t) If the police fail to act, when crimes are taking place within the court system, and it has been brought to their attention, it is contempt of court.
u) If the police (Ben Kovler) tamper with my phone, to tamper with the evidence, it is contempt of court.
DEMAND: Investigate the matter, and appoint a Body, Judge and MP, to lead a Public
Enquiry, onto the conduct of the Court Service and the police, in these matters.
I believe that the facts stated in this Statement of Truth are true
MARCH 17 2017 visitor No.642448 to mike/ann's www.opg.me SUE THE TRUSTEE video 16.3.2017 BREACH OF DUTY OF CARE
MARCH 16 2017 visitor No.642382 to mike/ann's www.opg.me UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 1-308
Review: It is so important to know and understand the meaning of without prejudice Uniform Commercial Code 1-308, in connection with your signature, that we should go over this once more. It is very likely that a judge will ask you what it means. So please learn and understand this carefully: The use of Without prejudice Uniform Commercial Code 1-30 in connection with my signature indicates that I have reserved my Common Law right NOT TO BE COMPELLED TO PERFORM under any contract I did not enter into KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY, and INTENTIONALLY. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any UN-REVEALED CONTRACT OR COMMERCIAL AGREEMENT.
Once you state that, that is all the judge needs to hear. Under the Common Law, a contract must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, by both parties or it can be declared void and unenforceable. You are claiming the right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that you did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And you do not accept the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or agreement.
The compelled benefit is the privilege to use Federal Reserve Notes to discharge your debts with limited liability rather than to pay your debts with silver coins. It is a compelled benefit, because there are no silver coins in circulation. You have to eat, and you can only buy food with a medium of exchange provided by the government. You are not allowed to print your own money, so you are compelled to use theirs. This is the compelled benefit of an unrevealed commercial agreement. If you have not made a valid, timely and explicit reservation of your rights under Uniform Commercial Code 1-308, and you simply exercise this benefit rendered by government, you will be obligated, under an implied agreement to obey every statute, ordinance and regulation passed by government, at all levels -- federal, state and local.
First-- to all my friend worldwide who are not Christian-- bear with me. I promise that this has a message for you, too, but for reasons that are or will become obvious, I am obliged to speak to and within the confines of Christian history for a moment.
In 1302, Pope Boniface established the world's first and largest Express Trust called the Unum Sanctum Trust. In this document he claimed that his office was that of Trustee for the whole earth and everything on it. That is, he claimed to own the air, the birds within in, the sea and all its creatures, and the earth, too, together with all the land animals and people and buildings on it.
He claimed to own it all and to be Christ's Trustee.
And the Roman Catholic Church set out to organize the entire world accordingly, and over the next few centuries, created three jurisdictions: air, land, and sea.
The air jurisdiction-- beside containing birds --- contains spirits and demons, angels, electric currents, sound waves and more---- is global in nature. That province the Church reserved for itself. Sins occur in the jurisdiction of the air.
The sea jurisdiction was farmed off to the British Monarch. Debts occur in the jurisdiction of the sea.
The land jurisdiction was farmed off to the Spanish Monarch. Losses occur in the jurisdiction of the land.
And that, with more or less success, has been the "way of the world" for the last seven centuries.
But wait a minute..... if the Pope in his office is Trustee of the Spirit Realm and in his office as Roman Pontiff the Trustee of the Material Realm.....why aren't all these bills being paid?
Obviously, Satan has been maintaining a stronghold somewhere.
Even though Jesus and Satan played for keeps, it wasn't the risen Christ that paid for the sins (debts) of the world. It was a very real, very material man. A carpenter from Galilee. And he is not here in the flesh to demand payment.
So, the theory was--- until He came back in the flesh it was business as usual. Satan just conveniently kept the Keys to the Kingdom of God and operated through the office of the Roman Pontiff, while the Pope held the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.
However, that wasn't the deal. If Jesus had made a single mis-step on his way to Golgotha, Satan's victory would have been assured. He would have reigned forever on Earth, until he destroyed it.
But Jesus carried through on His part of the bargain, paid the price, once and forever and for the whole world---- both goats and sheep, both tares and wheat, His own Followers and the Hindus of India and the Buddhists of Tibet and everyone else, everywhere, for all time. And--this is important--- all jurisdictions.
He absorbed all sins, all debts, all losses.
The Kingdom of Heaven knows no sin, no debt, no loss, no scarcity, no illness, but the Kingdom of God does.
These facts have been plainly stated in the scriptures for centuries and established in the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church along with the Unum Sanctum Trust and the claim of the Popes to be the Trustees of Christ on Earth--- His Vicar.
So it was time for someone, a Beneficiary acting as Jesus' Fiduciary Deputy in the flesh, to pull the plug.
Please see the attached Payment Bond. I presented it to Cardinal Mamberti, the head of the Vatican Chancery Court, as of January 6, 2017.
You will all note from reading the attached Original Copy of the Payment Bond, that it was delivered on the Day of the Three Kings, when the princes of the Earth pay homage to their Redeemer. You will notice that the Payment Bond lasts for 1,000 years during which the peace of the Kingdom of Heaven and its abundance is to reign and the swords are to be beaten into plowshares. You will note that it is for redemption of the Kingdom of God, where all the sins and debts and losses are stored up. You will note that it is for all NAMES or Names of any kind. You will note that it puts an end to the Doctrine of Scarcity, and that it proclaims that the Law of Heaven is in force on Earth: to keep the peace, to love each other, and to do no harm. And there is no other law we are bound to.
This has been done for each and every one of you regardless of your belief or disbelief, your faith or lack thereof. You have been dearly bought and are now redeemed, set free of sin, debt, and loss. The cruelty of Satan's Rule is ended. A new life lies before you.
In embracing this new life, leave behind the ideas of differences and tribes.
Dear children, note---- we are all unique. Each one of us is utterly different from all else that is created. Protect and care for each one, for each one is sacred. Let all law and caretaking be focused on just each one, not on any group identity.
As long as we define ourselves as members of groups --tribes, nations, etc., we condemn ourselves to a world in which bigger nations will always subjugate smaller nations and larger gangs will punish smaller gangs. Let this thinking go. Let all tribalism diminish until it is only a dim memory.
In the end, there is only each one of you, utterly precious, utterly unique--- and All That Is, that you are part of.
My name "Anna Maria" means the "Grace of Mary", who, when the angel came to her, said--- "Let it be done to me according to your word." These words have echoed through the centuries in the hearts and minds and experiences of all those who have given themselves to the Lord of Heaven.
So let it be and let it begin.
Dear Monique -- The Nature of My Work with the Vatican
There are a lot of irresponsible, ignorant, whack-job comments being made by Michael R. Hamilton and others of his ilk trying to paint me as an "agent of the Vatican"---- when I have been one of those on the forefront of exposing the worldwide fraud, demanding an end to it, and bringing Notice and Due Process against the perpetrators.
This afternoon I got yet another heartfelt--- "I like you, but what are you doing with the Vatican?" note.
In the first place, it's not "the Vatican" that I have ever been involved with. My complaints were taken straight to the Pope. Forget his property management firm.
Here below is my reply---
Once I realized that there was an immense fraud going on, I tracked it back to corporations, and then realizing that corporations are all created by the Roman Curia it was a no-brainer to track the problem back to the Pope. At the same time, Heather Tucci-Jareff and the Paradigm Project were confirming the same thing--- that virtually all the governments in the world were corporations and they were all tied to and ultimately under the control of the Holy See.
So a group of Americans took the complaint to Pope Benedict.
The Pope as Roman Pontiff and leader of the Holy See basically owns and operates all these "governments" and all the sub-corporations of these government corporations worldwide.
I came to the Pope with the fraud and breach of trust complaint that I have blatted throughout the western world, not because I was Catholic ---I am in fact Lutheran---but because I realized that he was the CEO in charge of the whole mess. Who else should I talk to but the man in charge?
He asked me to help give Notice to his subordinates, which is a necessary part of Due Process, so I did. I acted as a private attorney-- not a member of the Bar, not an office of the Holy See, not an office of the Vatican--- but as Benedict's voice to tell them all to knock it off and make amends.
Some were so ignorant that they didn't realize who their ultimate CEO was. Others were so crooked and grown so used to getting away with their criminality that they didn't care. And a very few did know what I was talking about and started taking action to end the fraud against the American people and other people throughout the world.
But you don't have to take my word for this circumstance--- read Heather Tucci-Jareff and the Paradigm Project Report which confirms everything I have told you is true in law, is also true in fact. She and her cohorts discovered the same fraud and same facts via a different road---through accounting audits--- and they foreclosed on all the corporations involved, but could not figure out how to move on to liquidation.
So there you have it---- discovery of the fraud, notice of the fraud given to the guilty parties, second notice given to the guilty parties (employees), foreclosure, and now, liquidation.
I and those working with me have also figured out a way to get rid of the worldwide debt and the whole debt-based fiat money system without hurting anyone, so that is what is being used to transform the world and it is not another dirty trick.
The key thing that you and every other American has to realize is that you do have an actual "de jure" government---- it has stood vacant for many years, waiting for you all to "return" but it is still here thanks to our efforts to retain and sustain it and re-assert it. The way you return is by turning in the US PERSON that was foisted off on you to the Secretary of the Treasury. This then officially returns you to the land and the freedom and the guarantees that have always rightfully been yours.
End of my reply to Monique.
I hope that those reading this will get the very simple facts straight--- I complained to the Pope about this ugly circumstance, he agreed that it couldn't go on and asked for help, I took up the job of giving Notice to his corporate subordinates, and have continued on to prosecute the claim against the office of the Roman Pontiff and the Holy See step by step ever afterward.
I am sure that there are numbnutz out there who think that you can solve problems without addressing the people responsible for them, and many others who are still asleep who think that the world begins and ends with their own country and that there is nothing beyond Washington, DC---- but I am burdened with the knowledge that apparently escapes most Americans---that we are just a part of a larger whole and inextricably bound by our common planet to take our place and shoulder our responsibilities and keep watch on the larger sphere of government that is international in nature.
America and Americans are owed treaties, compacts, commercial contracts, and trust relationships that have been violated by fraud and breach of trust. It does no good for us to stand around complaining to each other, when the source of the problem is beyond our shores. I realized and you should all realize that the battle had to be carried to the Queen and the Pope and the banks and the other governments and the Lord Mayor of London and a great many other parties responsible for this criminality. The wrong-doing had to be exposed to them and to the entire rest of the world and to all of you, too, otherwise nothing would change for the better.
In another two years, the de Jure government owed to the united States of America would have been declared defunct, dead, non-existent anymore.
There would have been no states for you to come home to. No state session laws to define state offices owed to you. No constitution. No guarantees. No treaties held by succession. No international recognition.
You would have been permanently adrift as slaves owned by the Crown. Look at how they have marked your Birth Certificates with dates and numbers referencing "Historic states".
Those are your states that were going bye-bye right underneath your noses.
And if it were not for people like me, and the Paradigm Project, and many, many, many unsung heroes---- all the ranting soapbox voices who are just discovering that we are owed the Unites States of America Post Offices, would have been S.O.L. with nothing but a "historical state" to call home.
So in your more sober moments, give thanks that I had sense enough to beard the Pope in his Lair and that I was tough enough and brave enough to keep going even when I was all but alone, and that I did speak to the Queen about this and that I did have the brass cajones to address the Lord Mayor and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and literally thousands more lesser dignitaries.
It's because of me and people like me that you have a country and a future that is brighter day by day. So listen to an old woman who has earned her stripes. It's not all that surprising that corporations managed to take over your country. What is amazing is that they did it and nobody paid close enough attention to discern the deceit. They got away with it for 150 years!
So when I say--- "Wake to Hell up!" --- I mean it literally. The forces of Hell, of Satan, were at your door, eating you out of house and home, using deceit to defraud you out of your land and your homes and even your children. These shadowy criminals had grown so fat and bold that they were ready to kill you off by the billions and bring Nazi Germany to life on American soil.
From now on, it is up to all of you to learn how things work and who controls what and raise your own voices and take responsibility for your own political status. This country and its government is a precious possession. It is being handed on to you with the understanding that you will respect its past as you bring forth its future.
WHO IS TRADING ON YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE/BOND FUND?
Follow the instructions...
...you will need is any court case numbers for any active cases you have, the social security card of your corporate citizen status [United States Citizen], and a copy of your birth certificate.
Instruction 1 – Go to www.fidelity.com . The page should look like the following page.
Instruction 2 - You will see a tab in the upper left hand corner the tab for RESEARCH. Click on it and then click on the QUOTE option.
Instruction 3 - At the top of the page you will see DELAYED QUOTES. Click on SYMBOL LOOKUP.
Instruction 4 - Take the number of the court case, birth certificate o the social security number & red Cusip number on the back of the social security card and place it in the box. Make the search by Mutual Fund and Fund Number.
Click on the Search Button
For Social security & red CUSIP Numbers a new Cusip number will appear on the page. This number is the number of the CUSIP that is on the bond that the social security account is linked to.
Instruction 5 - Write down the CUSIP number and then go back to the previous page that had DELAYED QUOTES at the top. Click on the option that is spelled here. The sentence should read, “to quote or lookup a bond click here.”
Instruction 6 - You will be directed to a page that allows you to put that CUSIP number in a search on the left side of the page. Press Go.
Instruction 7 - What will appear next is a page that says BOND RESULTS. Near the middles of the page you will have 2 options. One is for a contact to a call rep who can explain questions about the bond. Click on Call Rep to get the phone number. The next one will tell you who is holding the bond. Click on this Option that is below Description.
MARCH 11 2017 Visiter No.642252 to mike/ann's www.opg.me STATEMENT by AMANDA DUNN
IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
11TH MARCH 2017
I WRITE THIS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC, SO THAT THEY MAY BE ALERTED TO THE ATROCITIES THAT CAN HAPPEN TO THEIR LOVED ONES.
IN JANUARY 2013 TWO WEEKS AFTER MY POOR MUTHER SUFFERED AN EXTENSIVE STROKE, REMOVING HER CAPACITY TO SPEAK, WALK, WRITE, AND THE USE OF HER RIGHT ARM, TWO PERSONS STARTED A PROCESS TO GAIN LASTING POWERS OF ATTORNEY OVER HER LIFE, UNBEKNOWN TO ME.
THEY WERE SUCCESFUL, DEPSITE MY MOTHER HAVING NO MENTAL CAPACITY.
A MANDATORY IMPERATIVE IN THIS PROCESS.
AT THIS TIME, THE PROGNOSIS OF LIFE, WAS VERY SMALL.
I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO LOSE MY MUM.
OTHERS SAW THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GAIN POWERS OF ATTORNEY.
THESE POWERS GAVE ONE PERSON THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALL DECISIONS ON MY MOTHERS LIFE.
THIS INCLUDED THE RIGHT TO DECIDE DNR.
IT IS THE MOST POWERFUL DOCUMENT ANYONE COULD GAIN OVER A PERSONS LIFE. YET WILTSHIRE COUNCIL, ON RECOGNISING THE ABSENCE OF THE MANDATORY IMPERITIVES, DID NOTHING TO PREVENT THIS HAPPENING, AND OVER A MONTH LATER, WHEN IT WAS RUBBER STAMPED BY THE OPG, DID NOTHING TO HALT THIS ILLEGAL ACTIVITY.
IT TOOK THE REST OF THE FAMILY MANY MONTHS TO KNOW WHAT HAD HAPPENED, AND THREE YEARS TO GATHER THE EVIDENCE OF HOW.
DURING THAT TIME, WE EXPERIENCED SUCH HENIOUS CRIMES AGAINST OUR MOTHER, AND NEGLECT AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL.
A LIST OF THESE ATROCITIES.
DENIED MEDICAL ATTENTION
LEFT IN THE COLD
UNEXPLAINED OPEN WOUNDS
DENIAL OF FAMILY
A SEXUAL ASSAULT ALERT
ILLEGAL DRAG LIFTING SANCTIONED BY WILTSHIRE COUNCIL
ILLEGAL OBTAINING OF LASTING POWERS OF ATTORNEY
EACH AND EVERY ONE HAS BEEN REPORTED TO WILTSHIRE COUNCIL BY VARIOUS CARE AGENCIES, & FAMILY
THE SEXUAL ABUSE ALERT, WAS FOUND TO REACH THE THRESHOLD OF SIGNIFICAT HARM, BUT SIGNED OFF, NEVER PUT THROUGH THE POLICE SYSTEM, NO SAFEGUARDING PUT IN PLACE.
THE REMAINDER OF THE FAMILY HAS SPENT OVER THREE YEARS TRYING TO RAISE THE ALARM AND RECTIFY THE SITUATION.
I NO LONGER FEEL HUMAN.
I HAVE SEEN MANY NEWS REPORTS OF PEOPLE TAKING THEIR OWN LIVES, OBER THE PAST FEW YEARS, DUE TO THE REMOVAL OF A FINANCIAL MEANS TO LIVE DURING ILLNESS.
I HAVE COMPLETELY UNDERSTOOD THEIR DECISION.
WHEN AN AUTHORITY OF POWER TREATS YOU IN AN INHUMANE WAY, WHEN YOU LITERALLY STOP FEELING HUMAN, LIFE LOSES IT’S MEANING.
I HAVE SPENT 4 YEARS FIGHTING FOR MY MOTHERS BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.
I HAVE CRIED SO MANY TEARS IN EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AS I HAVE BEEN BEATEN DOWN BY THE NEVER ENDING REFUSAL TO ACT BY THE AUTHORITIES..
I HAVE SPENT THOUSANDS OF HOURS LETTER WRITING, READING GOVERNMENT ACTS, MEETING WITH PEOPLE, BEGGING FOR HELP, I CAN NOT REMEMBER WHO I WAS BEFORE THIS HAPPENED.
I HAVE NEVER BEEN ALLOWED TIME TO COME TO TERMS FULLY, WITH THE STROKE SUFFERED BY MY MOTHER, AS I WAS AWARDED NO TIME, TO DO SO.
I MISS MY MUM. AND I HAVE TO SAY THAT, WHILE MY MUM LIVES, MISSING A LOVED ONE, SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR DEATH, NOT IN LIFE.
AFTER NEARLY TWO TEARS OF TRYING TO GET OUR VOICES HEARD, JAMES CAWLEY OF WILTSHIRE COUNCIL, FINALLY AGREED TO AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT. IT TOOK A FURTHER NINE MONTHS TO APPEAR.
WAITING FOR MY MUM TO DIE?
IN THAT ASSESSMENT THERE WAS THE EVIDENCE, THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE ATROCITIES WE HAD WITNESSED HAD ALL BEEN ILLEGAL, AS THE LASTING POWER’S OF ATTORNEY WERE ILLEGAL.
WILTSHIRE COUNCIL HAD KNOWN THIS FROM THE START.
I HAD BEEN SAYING THIS FOR OVER TWO YEARS, TO A COUNCIL, THAT WERE ALREADY FULLY AWARE.
WILTSHIRE COUNCIL HAD INFORMED THE APPLICANT, HE COULD NOT APPLY, AS OUR MOTHER DID NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO DONATE THESE POWERS.
ON DISCOVERY THAT HE HAD GONE AHAED ANYWAY, THEY MADE ONE PHONE CALL TO A FIRM OF SOLCITORS, THEY DID NOTHING MORE THAT I HAVE EVIDENCE OF.
THE ILLEGAL OBTAINING OF LASTING POWERS OF ATTORNEY IS A SERIOUS CRIME.
IF SOMEONE IS WILLING TO COMMIT SUCH A CRIME, IT IS OBVIOUS THEY DO NOT HAVE THE BEST INTEREST OF A PERSON IN MIND.
THE DANGERS OF A PERSON WITH OUT BEST INTETEST IN MIND, HAVING COMPLETE CONTROL OVER YOUR LFE, ARE OBVIOUS.
HENCE WHY, IT IS A SERIOUS CRIME.
WHEN THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT ARRVED, I CRIED WITH RELIEF.
THE COUNCIL WILL DO WHAT IS NECESSARY NOW, I THOUGHT.
THIS IS OVER I THOUGHT. EVEN THOUGH IT COULD NEVER BE OVER IN MY MEMORIES.
WITNESSING A LOVED ONE GO THORUGH THIS, COULD NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
WILTSHIRE COUNCIL, DID NOTHIMG. THEY CONTINUED DOWN THE SAME PATH, OF IGNORE THE FAMILY CONCERNS, DENY ANY WRONG DOING.
I FELT LIKE I WAS GOING CRAZY, HOW COULD THIS BE?
WILTSHIRE POLICE HAD BEEN INVOLVED SO MANY TIMES; THEY HAD INSISTED THEY HAD INVESTIGATED, AS HAD THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC GUARDIAN.
HOW HAD THEY ALL MISSED WHAT THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR, HAD FOUND IN THE FILES?
BY THIS TIME, THIS HAD CLEARLY BECOME ABOUT THE FEAR OF WILTSHIRE COUNCIL BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
YEARS OF HEARTBREAKING AGONY .
YEARS OF FEELING NON HUMAN, DENIED MY MUM, BREAKING MY HEART ON A DAILY BASIS.
THE ATTORNEY WAS NOW HIDING MORE THAN JUST AN ILLEGAL PROCESS, MORE AND MORE ATROCITIES HAD TAKEN PLACE.
AN EVENTUAL HEARING IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION UNDER JUDGE RALTON, STATED THIS WAS A FAILED CARE PACKAGE.
A FAILED CARE PACKAGE THAT WILTSHIRE COUNCIL HAD WITNESSED FOR THREE YEARS.
A FAILED CARE PACKAGE THAT MY MUM HAD PAID FOR WITH HER LIFE SAVINGS, WHILE THE COURT TOOK THE REST, FOR THE BARRISTER, NOT EMPLOYED BY OUR MOTHER, WHO WAS PAID IN EXCESS OF £50,000 TO SEND HER BACK TO THE SAME TREATMENT.
MY MOTHER IS NOT A PACKAGE, SHE IS MY MUM, A HUMAN.
YET WHO DID THE JUDGE GIVE DECISION MAKING TO?
ALL THAT HAPPENED THAT DAY, IS THE JAILER, CHANGED HANDS.
RIGHT NOW, WILTSHIRE COUNCIL, ARE TRYING TO BLAME ME FOR THEIR FAILED CARE PACKAGE, REASON.
REPORTING BRUISING, AND ALLOWING MY MOTHER TIME TO DRINK HER DRINK ON A COMMUNITY ACCESS VISIT.
A DRINK SHE NEEDED TO WASH DOWN FOOD, AS SHE SUFFERS FROM SWALLOWING PROBLEMS.
THE COURT DIRECTIVES FOR FAMILY CONTACT HAVE NEVER BEEN FOLLOWED.
WE WERE GRANTED ONE HOUR, IN THE STREET, WITH OUR MOTHER, ON CHRISTMAS DAY.
THE CRIMINALS, CAN STILL DO AS THEY PLEASE.
EVEN AS I WRITE THIS, I HAVE TO REMIND MYSELF THIS IS REAL.
SADLY WE ARE NOT THE ONLY FAMILY TO SUFFER LIKE THIS. THE MEDIA IS LITTERED WITH HORROR STORIES OF ELDER ABUSE, AND THE COURT OF PROTECTION, A STRANGE TERM FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE A DARK HOLE IN OUR SO CALLED JUSTICE SYSTEM.
AT THIS POINT I WILL INFORM YOU OF SOME VERY STRANGE PLAY ON WORDS.
IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION, THIS MEANS SECRECY.
THIS KEEPS THE PRESS OUT.
THIS MEANS THE JUDGE HAS DECIDED, YOU ARE THEN TOLD YOU HAVE AGREED.
THIS ONLY APPLIES TO HUMANS.
THE AUTHORITIES CAN IGNORE THEM.
MEANS MONEY. THE PERSON DEEMED WITH NO CAPACITY WILL PAY FOR THE PROTECION OF THE COURT, UNDER THE SECRECY OF THE TRANSPARENCY, IN AN AGREEMENT THAT NOBODY AGREED TO., WHICH CREATES AGREEMENTS THAT ONLY THE PERSON WITH NO CAPACITY WILL HAVE TO LIVE UNDER, AND NO AUTHORITY IS REQUIRED TO. MAKE SENSE TO YOU?
NO ME NIETHER.
ACCORDING TO WILTSHIRE COUNCIL MEANS THE JUDGE CAN BE POLICE, PROSECUTOR, JUDGE AND JURY, IN CRIMINAL CASES.
FOR THREE YEARS WE WERE LIED TO.
INVESTIGATIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE, NOTHING TO FIND, WE WERE TOLD.
AFTER A COMPLAINT TO THE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, ONE SINGULAR MAN, DID HIS JOB CORRECTLY, THE ONLY EVIDENCE WE HAVE SEEN SO FAR, OF THIS HAPPENING.
THERE HAD BEEN NO INVESTIGATIONS.
INFLUENCES FROM OUTSIDE AUTHORITIES HAD PREVENTED THAT.
WHAT AUTHORITY CAN INFLUENCE THE POLICE?
SURELY THAT, IS PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE?
SO WHICH OUTSIDE AUTHORITIES DID THIS?
THE COUNCIL, THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC GUARDIAN, THE COURT OF PROTECTION?
THREE MONTHS AGO, I WAS TOLD THAT AN INVESTIGATION WOULD TAKE PLACE,
THE FAMILY PROVIDED ALL OF THE EVIDENCE.
ALL MANDATORY IMPERATIVES HAD BEEN IGNORED..CRIMINAL.
WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF AN INVESTIAGTION.
TWO OUT OF FOUR WITNESS INTERVIEWS.
JUST AS IT WAS BEFORE.
WHICH AUTHORITY IS INFLUENCING THIS TIME.
MY GUESS IS THE ONE WITH THE MOST TO LOSE.
THE COUNCIL THAT DID NOTHING TO STOP THIS CRIME, ‘WITH KNOWLEDGE’.
I HAVE SHOUTED THE LOUDEST.
I AM THE MAIN TARGET.
THEY TRIED TO PUT ME IN PRISON FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT,
DO I HOLD THEM IN CONTEMPT? YES I DO.
I RELEASED PHOTOS OF MY MOTHER COVERED IN BRUSIES.
CONTEMPT OF COURT THEY CRIED.
NOT THE JUDGES DECISION, THE COUNCIL.
THEY FORCED ME TO COURT, UNDER A THREAT OF PRISON, WITH A COMMITTAL HEARING SET, AND HAD ME GAGGED.
THEY WANTED 11 YEARS, JUSTICE JONATHAN BAKER DID NOT AGREE, AND MADE IT SIX MONTHS.
NOW THEY ARE TRYING AGAIN.
THIS TIME THEY HAVE ADDED ME AS A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS, WITHOUT MY AGREEMENT OR CONSENT.
ANOTHER RUSE TO SILENCE ME, AS THE GAGGING IS NO LONGER IN PLACE.
THEY SEEM TO THINK THIS ABUSE OF PROCESS WILL GO UNOTICED.
CIVIL COURTS HAVE NO AUTHORITY IN CRIMINAL CASES.
WHAT HAS BEEN MY CRIME?
REPORTING BRUISES AND OPEN WOUNDS
ALLOWING MY MOTHER TIME TO DRINK HER DRINK ON A COMMUNITY ACCESS VISIT
VISITING MY MOTHER, WHEN A DETECTIVE SERGEANT HAD READ THE ORDERS AND TOLD ME I COULD.
RISKING THE CARE PACKAGEIS THE COUNCILS ACCUSATION.
THE JUDGE INFORMED US THAT HE WAS SENDING MY MOTHER BACK, TO BE IN LINE WITH LORD MUMBY’S SPEECH, REGARDING HAPPINESS AS THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT.
WHERE WAS THE PROOF OF HAPPINESS?
IS LIVING WITH SUSPECTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, SUPPOSED TO MAKE YOU HAPPY.
MY MOTHER CAN NOT TELL ANYONE IF SHE IS HAPPY.
MY MOTHER SMILES AND NODS INAPPROPRIATELY, WHEN CONFRONTED BY STRANGERS. MY MOTHER DOES NOT HAVE ANY IDEA WHO THEY ARE, OR WHAT THEIR INTENTIONS ARE.
MY MOTHER STILL RECOGNISES HER DAUGHTERS, AND THE ONLY TRUTH WE HAVE HAD FROM THE COUNCIL, IS THAT BEING WITH THEM, IS IMPORTANT TO HER.
MY MOTHER HAD DOCUMENTED PREVIOUS WISHES, TO BE CARED FOR BY HER DAUHHETRS.
IGNORED BY THE COURT.
PLEASE BE AWARE DOCUMENTING YOUR PREVIOUS WISHES, WILL HOLD NO WEIGHT IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION IF AN ALTERNATIVE CONCLUSION SUITS THE COURT.
THIS IS NOT MY FIRST AWFUL EXPERIENCE WITH WILSHIRE COUNCIL AND WILTSHIRE POLICE.
27 YEARS HAS MADE NO IMPROVEMNETS.
IN 1990 I REPORTED A DANGEROUS SEXUAL PREDATOR, TO THEM BOTH. I HAD SOLID EVIDENCE.
I WAS NOT THE FIRST TO REPORT HIM, MANY HAD ALREADY DONE SO.
HE PREYED ON CHILDREN, TO SEXUALLY ABUSE THEM.
THEY IGNORED MY EVIDENCE, THEN LOST IT.
IN 2009, 19 YEARS LATER, I WAS CONTATCED BY A DIFFERENT POLICE FORCE; THEY HAD TRACED MY REPORT WITH THE COUNCIL, AFTER ALL OF THOSE YEARS.
I WAS ASKED TO BE A WITNESS, AND I AGREED.
THAT MAN IS CURRENTLY SERVING A 21 YEAR PRISON SENTENCE.
HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN WERE ABUSED IN THOSE 19 YEARS. HUNDREDS. MOST TOO BROKEN TO BE RELIABLE WITNESSES, THE POLICE TOLD ME.
ANOTHER HARD BATTLE THAT I FOUGHT AT THE TIME, THAT BROKE MY TRUST IN THE AUTHORITIES WE LIVE UNDER, AND CHANGED MY LIFE FOREVER.
THIS IS WHAT THEY REALLY WANT SILENCED; THIS IS WHY THE LIES ABOUT ME, AND THE CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE.
I WILL NOT BE SILENCED.
IF THE MEDIA OF THIS COUNTRY CANNOT TELL THE TRUTHS, I WILL GO TO ANOTHER COUNTRY,
I WILL KEEP GOING UNTIL JUSTICE IS SERVED.
THIS ACCOUNT FINISHED AT 9.21
GOING THROUGH IT ALL, TIME AND TIME AGAIN, TAKES EVERYTHING I HAVE.
I DO NOT HAVE A LIFE ANYMORE, I HAVE PAIN, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, AND THE FEELING OF ALREADY BEING DEAD, AS I AM NOT A HUMAN IN THEIR EYES.
THE LASTING POWERS OF ATTORNEY WERE REVOKED, BUT NOT AT THE REQUEST OF THE COUNCIL, MAKING THAT REQUEST, WOULD HAVE INDICATED THEIR INVOLVEMENT,
UNDER THE PRESSURE OF MY SISTER’S SOLICITOR, THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC GAURDIAN, DID EVENTULALY ASK FOR THE REVOCATION, DUE TO OUR MOTHER NOT HAVIING THE CAPACITY TO DONATE.
THE LEGAL REQUIREMENT THAT NEVER EXISTED.
MY MOTHER HAS BEEN TREATED WORSE THAN A PRISONER BEING TORTURED IN THAT TIME.
‘WE ARE NUETRAL’, SAID THE SOLICITOR FROM THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC GUARDIAN. NEUTRAL?
YOU ARE THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN.
I WROTE TO THE QUEEN, THE CHIEF CONSTABLE, THE PCC, EVERYONE I COULD THINK OF.
THE MP HAS MADE IT VERY CLEAR IN HER RESPONSE, OF HER CONCRENS FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR MOTHER, BUT DENIED MY REQUEST FOR TABLING.
NOBODY HAS LISTENED TO THE CONCRENS OF THE MP.
AS NOBODY LSITENED TO ME.
DURING THESE FOUR YEARS I HAVE ENCOUNTERED SO MANY OTHERS IN SIMILAR SITUATIONS,, AS HAVE THE PRESS.
FORCED ADOPTIONS! ABUSE OF THE ELDERLY.
CAN A PARENT WRITE THEIR STORY? NO, HELD IN SECRET COURTS.
THE PAIN OF LOSING MY MOTHER FROM MY LIFE, IS UNBEARABLE.
A CHILD, HAD IT BEEN A CHILD, I WOULD NO LONGER BE HERE, AS THE THOUGHT OF THE REST OF MY LIFE WITHOUT MY CHILD, WOULD BE TOO MUCH TO BEAR.
I HAVE TO WONDER WHAT GOES ON IN MY MOTHER’S HEAD, DENIED FOUR OF HER CHILDREN.
I STILL HOPE FOR A RESTORATION OF MY MOTHER’S RIGHTS.
HOW CAN A PARENT EVER HOPE FOR THAT, ONCE THE CHILD HAS BEEN REMOVED?
I HAVE WITNESSED THE LIES TOLD ABOUT ME, AND THE LIES TOLD ABOUT MY MOTHER.
I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THIS IS A CHILD.
IF YOU CAN AFFORD TENS OF THOUSANDS FOR LEGAL ASSITANCE, AND IF THEY ARE HONORABLE, YOU MAY STAND A CHANCE.
THE MEDIA CAN ONLY STEP IN IF THEY CAN SHOW THAT IT IS ALREADY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE, FAR AND WIDE.
LET THE MEDIA IN, BY PUBLIC DEMAND.
MARCH 10 2017 Visiter No.642244 to mike/ann's www.opg.me FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE - BIRTH FRAUD UPON YOUR LEGAL NAME
MARCH 5 2017 Visiter No.642125 to mike/ann's www.opg.me CAMPAIGNER DAVID JOHN CLAPHAM
Dave John Clapham
The Criminal Process Usually begins with a Police Officer issuing a Citation (or) making an arrest with or without a Warrant [or] the Police Officer [or] County Attorney prepares a complaint based upon a sworn affidavit or information, which is presented to a Judge and a Warrant is then issued.
The defendant is subsequently arrested and is brought before a Judge for arraignment.
The Complaint and Warrant will reflect your [BIRTH NAME] or identify you as a [JOHN DOE], if your name is unknown, which is typed out in all capital letters!
This is not a mistake on their part because it is your Birth Certificate that is under arrest and not your living, flesh and blood person.
The hope of these pseudo Courts is that the flesh and blood person will be intimidated enough to accept responsibility for the Birth Certificate!
Sounds crazy but nothing is what it seems: It’s all Smoke and Mirrors.’
Most Police Officers do not know or have these details and believe in what they are doing and believe the lawyers who counsel them in law like they are Gods! Big mistake on their part because just like everyone else, they too have been vigorously lied to! You can’t trust lawyers to be inherently honest!
Police Officers are instructed to always print or type the Defendants Name in Capital letters but they are never told the reason why! As a precaution, you should always carry a copy of your Birth Certificate with you as part of your identification papers, which I will explain in the next paragraph.
At your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTH NAME] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly what you don’t want to do!
Remove your Birth Certificate and respond to him by stating: I am making a Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here and [hold up your Birth Certificate!]
Then state the following: As I understand this process Judge; the County Attorney [or] Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk and against the Trust, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style Manuel, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION, The Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST, then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!
So as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter, with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!
The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence!
You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them!
They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer of display a lack of confidence!
Appearances [the pomp and majesty] of these pseudo Courts, is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation! If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride!
NOTE: I’ve seen and heard of Judges and Prosecutors interfering with a defendant’s response, which made the defendant, become confused and he was subsequently committed into a mental hospital for psychiatric evaluation.
The Judge and Prosecutor successfully twisted what the defendant was trying to say and then the Judge Ordered a mental evaluation.
Understand that the County Attorney will be forced to pay the Cost of Court out of his own pocket, if the case is discharged, so he isn’t going to give up that easily and the Judge; Clerk and County Attorney, stand to make a pretty penny of your conviction and incarceration! So don’t screw it up…
If the County Attorney begins to act too cocky with you, you can take the wind out of his sails by asking him to produce the 1020 for this case? If he denies the need to do such a thing, inform him that you will be taking care of that for him ASAP [as soon as possible]!
He may move for a discharge at that point because you are a little too dangerous or smart! The last thing that Prosecutor wants is the IRS examining his files for the last seven years because he makes money on every conviction but he doesn’t pay TAXES on them as a Rule! He usually only declares the salary he receives.
Also: Should you accidentally find yourself in a mental hospital: the Psychiatrist who is assigned or appointed to evaluate you is just as corrupt as the Judge; Clerk and County Attorney and he will falsify all of your responses to him, just so that you are recommitted back into the mental facility with a review in six months! So lie to him and deny that you ever made such remarks! Of course, if you accept the criminal charges against your Birth Certificate, then you will instantly be deemed SANE!
Sorry that I had to be the one to tell you this but this is how corrupt many of my fellow Judges truly are and it should explain why my conscience caused me to retire early! Before I learned what was really going on; I believed that my duties and performance were entirely Constitutional. I was lied to also!
MARCH 1 2017 Visiter No.642010 to mike/ann's www.opg.me LAWLESS RACKETEERING BRITAIN Dear Mr. Ormerod
I have only just learnt about the above. I was always under the impression that there already is a common law in Britain regarding misconduct in public office, so I am surprised that yet another new law needs to be created to tackle it. More importantly, there is no law against racketeering in the UK, unlike the USA, who seem to manage to investigate racketeering and have many successful prosecutions.
Will you please take note of what much of the public knows to be happening to conceal high level organised crime and corruption? Unfortunately, this type of corruption is almost always transnational in nature, which is why foreign law enforcement needs to be aware of British negligence. Britain is in contravention of various international agreements to combat crime and corruption, because of its stubborn refusal to take action.
Some police are willing to seize people and incarcerate them, either to conceal their own corruption, or that of others. Boots-on-the-ground police simply follow orders.
Lancashire County Council, and the courts, decided to bankrupt Carol Woods because she had brought what they considered to be too many Employment Tribunals cases against them. Although the employer is allowed to recuperate costs if the plaintiff employee loses a a case, it is almost NEVER done. Nor should it be. There would be public outrage if it were discovered that an employee with a "beef" dared not take the employer to court for fear of losing and being lumbered with the defendant's legal costs. So this, I believe, is the reason for the incredibly complex cover up by all involved in depriving Carol Woods of her residence. This is a very serious matter.
When I and my team investigated why Carol Woods had been made homeless and destitute, it appeared that her bankruptcy has not been registered in the central bankruptcy records. Furthermore, she and her agents have been prevented from looking into this despicable act committed by her employer, police, judges, the Land Registry, Cumbria Properties, and the insolvency trustee in Blackpool. This was done by labelling Carol Woods a "vexatious litigant", and applying the same label to her investigation team to prevent a third party investigation. The courts and the insolvency people went into a complete panic when I and my team made enquiries about the so-called bankruptcy which stripped an elderly lady of all her assets and made her homeless. Her mental health is now very badly damaged. What appears to be taking place is serious organised crime at very high levels, and nobody will tackle the issue. NOBODY.
The Home Office has always ignored the problem and, in that respect, Theresa May was useless.
Where the organised corruption has involved the theft of homes, the Land Registry is also involved. Because police refuse to do their jobs and investigate white collar crimes, and there is no classification for reporting complex fraud to the National Statistician, despite the fact that there is the Fraud Act 2016, complex and serious organised crime proliferates in the UK, which is now aptly dubbed "The Organised Crime Capital of Europe" by the rest of the world. Police and government inaction regarding this matter has rendered the problem completely out of control, and the main objective of government appears to be simply to close ranks and cover it all up.
Carol Woods is far from being the only one who has lost her home or business due to corruption and organised crime in high places. Since sending out the email below, I have been corrected about the amount of time that Carol Woods was unlawfully incarcerated in Styal prison. She says it was five weeks, and not five days.
As you will see from the information below, it would appear that not only are police involved in the practice of making victims and whistle blowers disappear, but it cannot be done without the full co-operation of prison governors. Furthermore, my emails are being blocked by Lancashire Police. I know for a fact that police often block people from sending them emails, despite the fact that any previous communications have been polite and legitimate. Dafydd-Powys police and their ex commissioner, Christopher Salmon, have done the same to people I know who have lost their homes and businesses as a result of high level organised crime involving banks and other officials. Christopher Salmon has since gone on records as not wanting to have anything more to do with the organised crime. http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/8203-police-crime-commissioner-compares/story-29289729-detail/story.html
Britain does nothing to address these crimes, and NO public servant should be allowed to block emails from the public, particularly police.
Peter Hofschroer is a victim of organised crime that he alleges involves York Social Services and North Yorkshire Police, and others. He alleges that he was set up for crimes that he did not commit. As you can see, someone has given orders to make him disappear, and he is being unlawfully detained in Preston Prison, Lancashire, thanks to Lancashire Police not following due legal process and the prison co-operating. He has not been told why he is there. He was seized from his residence in Blackpool without any formal ceremony.
What checks and balances are in place at prisons to stop this practice?. Lack of policies seems to be rampant throughout the entire public sector, so that nobody can get into trouble if policy and procedure is not followed. It is all well thought out by those at the top with a hidden agenda. The best of the lot is that, no matter who you contact in government, they all claim it is not within their remit to take any action. ALL OF THEM.
It should also be noted, at this point, that Civil and Criminal Procedure Rules are being ignored by both the legal profession, some judiciary, and the courts, resulting in non-payment of court filing fees alone, and substantial losses for the Treasury. Authorities have been advised over and over again, but nobody seems to care. Someone is getting payoffs somewhere along the line.
I do believe that HM Inspector of Prisons, Mr. Peter Clarke, should have a much expanded role in preventing abuse such as that of the three persons mentioned below. Please bear in mind that these are ONLY THREE cases. There are many, many more. Here is another https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bphI-5UUqv0
When making your reports, I do hope you will consider this information, as the practice of making witnesses, victims of serious organised crime, and whistle blowers disappear is widespread. It also involves incarcerating them in mental institutions.
Please contact me if you would like any further information. In the meantime, Peter Hofschroer is waiting to be released from Preston Prison, and the governor should act quickly.
It is quite appalling that Britain can be operating like Soviet Russia and incarcerating people for political purposes. I would not have believed it to be true at one time in my life, but it is.
Thank you for your time and attention.-JJ
LETTER from Peter Hofschroer in PRISON here
It was dismissed as having 'NO MERIT' without providing a required reasoning. On the 27th Feb 2014 prior to the above by 1 year here In March 2014 I had an exchange of emails with bailey:reed here And so here we are again today with the same obstructions to pervert justice by public servant malfeasance showing a clear and consise closing of ranks to protect their collegues!
Fao bailey:reed 23.02.2017
An allegation of judging in your own cause, a claim from man
YOU.. being a servant of man… are JUDGING IN YOUR OWN CAUSE… providing the tort of ‘passing off’
You are passing off as your own justice system which is a common law crime that I now advise you on
FEB 22 2017 Visiter No.641772 to mike/ann's www.opg.me
AS IN OUR CASE JUDGING IN THEIR OWN CAUSE
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nemo judex in causa sua (or nemo judex in sua causa) is a Latin phrase that means, literally, "no-one should be a judge in his own cause." It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest. The rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: "Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done". May also be called:
nemo judex idoneus in propria causa est
nemo judex in parte sua
nemo judex in re sua
nemo debet esse judex in propria causa
in propria causa nemo judex
The legal effect of a breach of natural justice is normally to stop the proceedings and render any judgment invalid; it should be quashed or appealed, but may be remitted for a valid re-hearing. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex Parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) was an English legal case which involved the unprecedented setting aside of a House of Lords judgment based upon the possibility of bias. Lord Hoffmann's failure to declare links to Amnesty International meant that a previous House of Lords judgment on the immunity of former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet had to be set aside.
R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The King v. Sussex Justices. Ex parte McCarthy Court High Court of Justice
 KB 256
 EWHC KB 1
Judge(s) sitting Lord Hewart CJ, Lush and Sankey JJ R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ( 1 KB 256,  All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism "Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done."
In 1923 McCarthy, a motorcyclist, was involved in a road accident which resulted in his prosecution before a magistrates court for dangerous driving. Unknown to the defendant and his solicitor, the clerk to the justices was a member of the firm of solicitors acting in a civil claim against the defendant arising out of the accident that had given rise to the prosecution. The clerk retired with the justices, who returned to convict the defendant.
On learning of the clerk's provenance, the defendant applied to have the conviction quashed. The justices swore affidavits stating that they had reached their decision to convict the defendant without consulting their clerk.
The appeal was essentially one of judicial review and was heard at the King's Bench division by Lord Chief Justice Hewart. In a landmark and far-reaching judgement, Lord Hewart CJ said: “ It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the notes of the evidence in case the justices might desire to consult him, the justices came to a conclusion without consulting him, and that he scrupulously abstained from referring to the case in any way. But while that is so, a long line of cases shows that it is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.
The question therefore is not whether in this case the deputy clerk made any observation or offered any criticism which he might not properly have made or offered; the question is whether he was so related to the case in its civil aspect as to be unfit to act as clerk to the justices in the criminal matter. The answer to that question depends not upon what actually was done but upon what might appear to be done.
Nothing is to be done which creates even a suspicion that there has been an improper interference with the course of justice. Speaking for myself, I accept the statements contained in the justices' affidavit, but they show very clearly that the deputy clerk was connected with the case in a capacity which made it right that he should scrupulously abstain from referring to the matter in any way, although he retired with the justices; in other words, his one position was such that he could not, if he had been required to do so, discharge the duties which his other position involved. His twofold position was a manifest contradiction.
In those circumstances I am satisfied that this conviction must be quashed, unless it can be shown that the applicant or his solicitor was aware of the point that might be taken, refrained from taking it, and took his chance of an acquittal on the facts, and then, on a conviction being recorded, decided to take the point. On the facts I am satisfied that there has been no waiver of the irregularity, and, that being so, the rule must be made absolute and the conviction quashed.
The ruling is derived from the principle of natural justice and has been followed throughout the world in countries that use the English legal system. It has been applied in many diverse situations, including immigration cases, professional disciplinary cases, domestic tribunals such as members' clubs, and perhaps most famously in the Pinochet case, where the House of Lords overturned its own decision on the grounds of Lord Hoffman's conflict of interest.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE my INTENTIONS ANY FURTHER
will be added to our claim if you do continue to obstruct and pervert my course to justice!
please step out of my way as YOU are obstructing and perverting JUSTICE
FEB 22 2017 Visiter No.641772 to mike/ann's www.opg.me AS IN OUR CASE JUDGING IN THEIR OWN CAUSE From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nemo judex in causa sua (or nemo judex in sua causa) is a Latin phrase that means, literally, "no-one should be a judge in his own cause." It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest. The rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: "Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done".
May also be called:
nemo judex idoneus in propria causa est
nemo judex in parte sua
nemo judex in re sua
nemo debet esse judex in propria causa
in propria causa nemo judex
The legal effect of a breach of natural justice is normally to stop the proceedings and render any judgment invalid; it should be quashed or appealed, but may be remitted for a valid re-hearing.
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex Parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) was an English legal case which involved the unprecedented setting aside of a House of Lords judgment based upon the possibility of bias. Lord Hoffmann's failure to declare links to Amnesty International meant that a previous House of Lords judgment on the immunity of former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet had to be set aside.
R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The King v. Sussex Justices. Ex parte McCarthy
Court High Court of Justice
 KB 256
 EWHC KB 1
Judge(s) sitting Lord Hewart CJ, Lush and Sankey JJ
R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ( 1 KB 256,  All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism "Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done."
In 1923 McCarthy, a motorcyclist, was involved in a road accident which resulted in his prosecution before a magistrates court for dangerous driving. Unknown to the defendant and his solicitor, the clerk to the justices was a member of the firm of solicitors acting in a civil claim against the defendant arising out of the accident that had given rise to the prosecution. The clerk retired with the justices, who returned to convict the defendant.
On learning of the clerk's provenance, the defendant applied to have the conviction quashed. The justices swore affidavits stating that they had reached their decision to convict the defendant without consulting their clerk.
The appeal was essentially one of judicial review and was heard at the King's Bench division by Lord Chief Justice Hewart. In a landmark and far-reaching judgement, Lord Hewart CJ said:
“ It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the notes of the evidence in case the justices might desire to consult him, the justices came to a conclusion without consulting him, and that he scrupulously abstained from referring to the case in any way. But while that is so, a long line of cases shows that it is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.
The question therefore is not whether in this case the deputy clerk made any observation or offered any criticism which he might not properly have made or offered; the question is whether he was so related to the case in its civil aspect as to be unfit to act as clerk to the justices in the criminal matter. The answer to that question depends not upon what actually was done but upon what might appear to be done.
Nothing is to be done which creates even a suspicion that there has been an improper interference with the course of justice. Speaking for myself, I accept the statements contained in the justices' affidavit, but they show very clearly that the deputy clerk was connected with the case in a capacity which made it right that he should scrupulously abstain from referring to the matter in any way, although he retired with the justices; in other words, his one position was such that he could not, if he had been required to do so, discharge the duties which his other position involved. His twofold position was a manifest contradiction.
In those circumstances I am satisfied that this conviction must be quashed, unless it can be shown that the applicant or his solicitor was aware of the point that might be taken, refrained from taking it, and took his chance of an acquittal on the facts, and then, on a conviction being recorded, decided to take the point. On the facts I am satisfied that there has been no waiver of the irregularity, and, that being so, the rule must be made absolute and the conviction quashed.
The ruling is derived from the principle of natural justice and has been followed throughout the world in countries that use the English legal system. It has been applied in many diverse situations, including immigration cases, professional disciplinary cases, domestic tribunals such as members' clubs, and perhaps most famously in the Pinochet case, where the House of Lords overturned its own decision on the grounds of Lord Hoffman's conflict of interest.
!!! PAY ATTENTION !!!
A Cestui Que Vie Trust, also known by several other pseudonyms such as “Term of Life or Years” or “Pur Autre Vie” or "Fide Commissary Trust" or “Foreign Situs Trust” or “Secret Trust” is a pseudo form of trust first formed in the 16th Century under Henry VIII of England on one or more presumptions including (but not limited to) one or more Persons presumed wards, infants, idiots, lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a Trust may be “legally” formed were added in later statutes to include bankruptcy, incapacity, mortgages and private companies.
In terms of the evidential history of the formation of Cestui Que Vie Trusts:
(i) The first Cestui Que Vie Trusts formed were through an Act of Henry VIII of England in 1540 (32Hen.8 c1) and later wholly corrupted whereby the poor people of England, after having all their homes, goods and wealth seized in 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) under the “guise” of small religious estates under £200, were granted the welfare or “commonwealth” benefit of an Cestui Que Use or simply an “estate” with which to live, to work and to bequeath via a written will; and
(ii) In 1666 Westminster and the ruling classes passed the infamous “Proof of Life Act” also called the Cestui Que Vie Act (19Car.2 c.6) whereby the poor and disenfranchised that had not “proven” to Westminster and the Courts they were alive, were henceforth to be declared “dead in law” and therefore lost, abandoned and their property to be managed in their absence. This supremely morally repugnant act, which remains in force today, is the birth of Mundi and the infamous occult rituals of the British Courts in the wearing of black robes and other paraphernalia in honoring the “dead”; and
(iii) In 1707 Westminster under Queen Anne (6Ann c.18) extended the provisions of “Proof of Life” and Cestui Que Vie, extending the use of such structures ultimately for corporate and other franchise purposes. This wicked, profane and completely sacrilegious act in direct defiance to all forms of Christian morals and Rule of Law has remained a cornerstone of global banking and financial control to the 21st Century; and
(iv) In 1796, King George III (36 Geo.3. c.52 §20) duty was applied to Estates Pur Autre Vie for the first time; and
(v) In 1837 (1 Vict. c.26) and the amendments to the nature of Wills, that if a person under an Estate Pur Autre Vie (Cestui Que Vie) did not make a proper will, then such property would be granted to the executors and administrators.
In terms of the evidential history of the operation and any form of relief or remedy associated with Cestui Que Vie Trusts, taking into account all Statutes referencing Cestui Que Vie prior to 1540 are a deliberate fraud and proof of the illegitimacy of Westminster Statutes:
(i) The “first” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the claimed statutes of the reign of King Richard III in 1483 (1Rich.3 c.1) whereby the act (still in force) states that all conveyances and transfers and use of property is good, even though a purchaser may be unaware it is effectively under “cestui que use” (subject to a Cestui Que Vie Trust). The act also gives a vague and challenge path of relief that if one is of complete mind, not an infant and not under financial duress then any property under Cestui Que Vie Trusts is rightfully theirs for use; and
(ii) The “second” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the reign of Henry 7th in 1488 (4Hen.7 c.17) permitted lords to render any attempt by people classed as “wards” to demonstrate their freedom useless and that such lords may use writs and other devices to “force” such people back to being compliant “wards” (poor slaves). The only remedy under this act was if a ward demonstrated the waste of the lord as to the property (and energy) seized from the poor (ignorant white slaves); and
(iii) The “third” Act outlining the operation of Cestui Que Vie only hidden this time as Estate Pur Autre Vie was in 1741 under 14Geo.2 c.20) whereby one who was knowledgeable of the Cestui Que Vie slavery system could between the ages of 18 to 20, seek to recover such property under Cestui Que Vie and cease to be a slave. However, the same act made law that after 20 years, the remedy for such recovery was no longer available, despite the fact that the existence of Cestui Que Vie Trusts is denied and Westminster and Banks are sworn to lie, obstruct, hide at all cost the existence of the foundations of global banking slavery.
In terms of essential elements concerning Cestui Que Vie Trusts:
(i) A Cestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted "life" expectancy of the estate; and
(ii) A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in Cestui Que (Vie) Trust on their behalf, they do not “own” the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust and are only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust choose to provide them; and
(iii) The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust as pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void.
The Trust Corpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as the Estate from two Latin words e+statuo literally meaning “by virtue of decree, statute or judgment”. However, as the Estate is held in a Temporary not permanent Trust, the (Corporate) Person as Beneficiary is entitled only to equitable title and the use of the Property, rather than legal title and therefore ownership of the Property. Only the Corporation, also known as Body Corporate, Estate and Trust Corpus of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust possesses valid legal personality.
The Property of any Estate created through a Temporary (Testamentary) Trust may be regarded as under “Cestui Que Use” by the Corporate Person, even if another name or description is used to define the type of trust or use. Therefore “Cestui Que Use is not a Person but a Right and therefore a form of "property".
In 1534, prior to the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VIII declared the first Cestui Que Vie type estate with the Act of Supremecy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later, James I of England modified the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowns). By the 18th Century, the Crown was viewed as a company. However by the start of the 19th Century around 1814 onwards upon the bankruptcy of the company (1814/15) , it became the fully private Crown Corporation controlled by European private banker families.
Since 1581, there has been a second series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of "persons" and rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:
(i) In 1651 the Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1651-52 which introduced the concept of "settlements", enemies of the state and restrictions of movement in states of "emergency"; and
(ii) In 1861 the Emergency Powers Act 1861; and
(iii) In 1931 the Emergency Relief and Construction Act 1931-32; and
(iv) in 2001 the Patriot Act 2001.
Since 1591, there has been a third series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of "soul" and ecclesiastical rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:
(i) In 1661 the Act of Settlement 1661-62; and
(ii) In 1871 the District of Columbia Act 1871; and
(iii) In 1941 the Lend Lease Act 1941.
By 1815 and the bankruptcy of the Crown and Bank of England by the Rothschilds, for the 1st time, the Cestui Que Vie Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private banks effectively becoming "private trusts" or "Fide Commissary Trusts" administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 and the Wills Act, these private trusts have been also considered "Secret Trusts" whose existence does not need to be divulged.
From 1917/18 with the enactment of the Sedition Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act in the United States and through the United Kingdom, the citizens of the Commonwealth and the United States became effectively "enemies of the state" and "aliens" which in turn converted the "Fide Commissary" private secret trusts to "Foreign Situs" (Private International) Trusts.
In 1931, the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican created the Bank for International Settlements for the control of claimed property of associated private central banks around the world. Upon the deliberate bankruptcy of most countries, private central banks were installed as administrators and the global Cestui Que Vie/Foreign Situs Trust system was implemented from 1933 onwards.
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the child forever any rights of Real Property, any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be known as man and woman rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
Since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que(Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.
Since 1933, when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowingly and willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a promissory note is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 claims of property of the Roman Cult, being Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property and the denial of any rights to men and women, other than those chosen as loyal members of the society and as Executors and Administrators.
The Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property for most men and women, corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the Bar Association Courts. The first form of law is corporate commercial law is effective because of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law is maritime and trust law is effective because of the 2nd Cestui Que Vie Trust. The 3rd form of law is Talmudic and Roman Cult law is effective because of the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust of Baptism.
The Birth Certificate issued under Roman Law represents the modern equivalent to the Settlement Certificates of the 17th century and signifies the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman Slave. The Birth Certificate has no direct relationship to the private secret trusts controlled by the private banking network, nor can it be used to force the administration of a state or nation to divulge the existence of these secret trusts.
As the Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the ongoing bankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed private property of the Roman Cult banks and therefore cannot be directly claimed or used.
While the private secret trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly addressed, they are still formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership of the name, the body, the mind and soul of infants, men and women. Each and every man and woman has the absolute right to rebuke and reject such false presumptions as a member of One Heaven and holder of their own title.
Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks are created on false presumptions, when a man or woman makes clear their Live Borne Record and claim over their own name, body, mind and soul, any such trust based on such false presumptions ceases to have any property.
Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment.
The Slavery System
Whether we realized it or not, until recently, we were all ‘legally’ debt or ‘labor’ slaves, as were our parents, our grandparents and great grandparents before us.
Since 1933 every new child born was required to be ‘registered’, thereby creating a Corporate Person, effectively denying that child any rights as an owner of Real Property.
The act of registering a child contracted them as chattel, and the birth record was a deceptive legal way of getting the parents to sign the baby away. The birth record was in fact a promissory note that was converted into a slave bond, which was then sold to a private reserve bank effectively giving ownership of the child to the bank.
Each new baby’s contract was sealed by either a drop of their blood or by an ink impression of their foot onto the birth record. This ‘signature’ was used to create their lifetime value, evidenced by their labor and the taxes and costs of that labor as monetized currency – all designed to keep people in servitude for their entire lifetime.
The banks have been the modern slave owners and as the saying goes, “He who owns the debt owns the people.” The way the Slavery System was imposed on us meant that even if we did end up paying off our house or our car, we never actually owned it, because our right to any Real Property ownership was given away at the registration of our birth.
This has been legal process since 1540 via something called a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and this was still in effect until the recent UCC Rulings changed the legal landscape and reinstated the un-rebuttable fact that no-one can own our ‘selves or own our bodies.
The slavery system remained intact for so long because of educational doctrines, the influence of our community at large and because so many people accepted and embraced their slavery by waiting for others to help them or to tell them what they should/could or should/could not do. Enforcers like the police and courts made sure we stayed within the slavery system and incarcerated us if we chose to live as FREE individuals.
In fact, the slavery system was imposed on us all (and maintained for centuries) by building walls in our minds through propaganda and conditioning, creating the false belief that we did not deserve better, that we were not part of a greater plan and that we should instead be happy with the handouts, crumbs and ‘indulgences’ given to us by the Powers That Were (PTW), while the system itself reaped in millions of dollars every year, directly from the sweat and blood of our labor....But no more.
FEB 21 2017 Visiter No.641736 to mike/ann's www.opg.me GETTING TO GRIPS WITH PERSONAGE & BARRATRY "Personage and Barratry " This is what the lawyers, bankers, and politicians have used to enslave you. It is a crime known a...
David Russell·Saturday, 7 January 2017
:GLOSSA: ~ Have you and your/their 'person' ever wondered why the SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? (the Glossa)
Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud.
See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power.
The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship.
And these corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate - Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you.
Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT.
This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin'
The main place this ALL UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written.
ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’.
Thus, defining this text as a foreign language. Further going onto say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seam to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford.
Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts.
If you take a second to analyse any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving licence, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realise that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPERCASE.
Soon you will realise that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless.
Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation it can only impose fines and acts, upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies.
This is a crime known as “personage”.
Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily.
The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages?
DostCaseDiagramsMaster.pdf here kensecuritisation.pdf here here lies the truth
FEB 20 2017 Visiter No.641729 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THE CASE OF JAILED 71YR OLD THERESA KIRK SOLICITOR SPEAKS OUT
Practitioners involved in a high-profile Court of Protection case have spoken out after it emerged that a 71-year-old woman jailed for contempt had been fighting to let her brother spend his remaining months in his country of birth.
The court last week lifted restrictions on identifying the individual at the centre of Teresa Kirk v Devon County Council, Manuel Martins, who died on 1 February. Kirk was jailed in September last year after failing to comply with an order to sign a declaration of authority in relation to Martins, who lacked capacity.
Hal Branch, partner at London firm LSGA Solicitors, which represented Kirk when she was appealing her imprisonment, said: ‘The Court of Protection acknowledged that Mrs Kirk had a sincere and genuine belief that her brother was better off in a care home in Portugal and not one in England. However this was effectively ignored throughout with the court making penal orders against Mrs Kirk at the request of Devon County Council and the Official Solicitor.
‘No one seemed to consider what Mrs Kirk’s brother wanted and it is inconceivable that he would have wished his sister to be imprisoned for six months for doing what she thought was best for him.’
Last month the Court of Appeal approved a consent order setting aside the provision in the Court of Protection order requiring Kirk to provide the signed written declaration of authority.
Branch said the case raised important issues about the role of the official solicitor. ‘While it is arguable whether they should have been appointed at all, having been so, they simply followed Devon County Council without giving real consideration of what Mr Martins really wanted,’ he said.
‘As the Court of Appeal pointed out when releasing Mrs Kirk from prison, in the past the [official solicitor] would have immediately applied to the court to obtain the release of Mrs Kirk when she was initially imprisoned, as it was clearly in the interests of Mr Martins that they do so. Sadly, in this case the [official solicitor] supported the imprisonment of Mrs Kirk.’
A Court of Appeal judgment published last month reveals that Martins was ‘exposed to a significant charge upon his diminishing estate to meet the costs of his representation in these proceedings’.
Barrister Colin Challenger, who helped Kirk mount a challenge against her imprisonment, said: ‘The Court of Protection should make a decision by itself. If the court wants to appoint someone… it should be back to the days of legal aid and the appointed person should be paid by other taxes.’
Devon County Council, in a statement, said: 'This is a complex case in which our paramount concern has always been the welfare of Mr Martins; a vulnerable adult who lacked mental capacity and to whom we owed a clear safeguarding duty.
'We have only ever sought to act in Mr Martins' best interests with a view to facilitating a safe return to his home. The Official Solicitor, acting on behalf of Mr Martins, supported our application and the Court of Protection accepted our argument that it would be in the best interests of Mr Martins to return to live in his hometown in Devon.
Unfortunately, the English courts were ultimately not able to facilitate such a return after Mr Martins was removed, during proceedings, to a foreign jurisdiction that had not ratified the Hague Convention on the protection of vulnerable adults.
'Devon County Council is disappointed that it was not ultimately possible for the court to impose its own judgment and ensure Mr Martins' safe return to the community in which he had chosen to live for over 50 years. We consider we could have done nothing more to try and achieve this result on his behalf.'
A spokesperson for the Official Solicitor said it did not comment on individual cases or rulings.
FEB 20 2017 Visiter No.641714 to mike/ann's www.opg.me KEN DOST or kenneth-william:dost Provides an insight, an explanation
Here is our answer – the target to the ends of justice
The Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (TAMRA) provides for greater than general creditor status under IRC 130. Private Letter Ruling (PLR) 92530245 details taking possession of an annuity contract under a secured creditor. Accordingly, a claimant (persons taken by deception of a mortgage loan that never actually existed), may perfect his/her security interest either of two ways as it relates to taxes to the estate. One way is for the claimant to take possession of the Treasuries (As so with UCC1 financing statements (equitable)/US copyright transfer of title (legal) – thereby Doctrine of Merger to superior secured party status). The other way is to allow the Treasuries to remain in the trust subject to a “control agreement” until a successor trustee is established. What is the the control agreement? Deed of Trust/mortgage…We know the subject we are dealing with has nothing to do with a mortgage to real property, instead is actually about the estate, more specially insurance life settled benefits, more specifically annuities, and even more specifically structured settlements – meaning valued credits (or for those still disillusioned by bullshit and deception – money) in the present, and here and now, while you are alive…..WOHOO!!!!!!!!!..........no BOO HOO!!!!!! as this is the scam being run past billions of people worldwide so the BAR, banksters, elite – the privileged and privy, and those corrupted by placement in the revenue stream: judges, clerks, state officers, etc.
Soooooo…to put into simple perspective….
if in fact, the DOT/mortgage is said to be a “Death Pledge”
….and the Certificate of Birth with our all caps is a legal fiction, incapable of drawing breath, that is to say, possessing of life……a DOT/mortgage is ½ a death pledge as drawn to FIRST MIDDLE LAST.
living man/woman’s signature breathes life providing the other 50% …..50 + 50 = 1 whole person 50% dead…..
This is a key point to understand because if we are a vessel in commerce, said to be lost at sea, aimlessly floating in a sea of incompetence called a legal fiction or personality. This personality connects to our living person….A question for another discussion might be, who shapes the personality – is it the living person or third parties that control how personality is publicly perceived. In other words, by intentionally setting the living man/woman up for economic and financial failure…..Actually, we know the answer to this…..WE ARE SETUP AND CONTROLED BY THOSE WHO ARE AFTER ONE THING …
What is this one thing?...our life settled annuities to which they set us up for their taking and enjoyment in their lifetime, by destroying ours..
They do this by killing off the other 50%.....the pesky side of us that breathes, talks, and has blood running through veins. They do this by dragging our living asses into court in what we are made to believe is a judicial process, but in fact is merely administrative, structured in a manner in the living cannot be heard or seen.
So while the living man/woman believes they are defending against a foreclosure or arrest or whatever it may be, what is really happening in that courtroom is we are being deemed incapable to meeting the financial obligations or whatever obligation a plaintiff alleges.
What is happening is the judge is ‘legally’ killing off the remaining 50% of your life, in this manner these BAR fucking crooked assholes are filing papers in probate to the abandonment of your estate on a number of different causes and reasons, so they can steal the multi-millions accrued annuities, leaving you an babbling incompetent ward of the state……
The above is perhaps the simplest and most concise explanation I have yet put forth…..if you don’t understand the above have your 10 year old hit you over the head with a 2 x 4
and if you don’t by now, you need to spend some time learning and understanding why this is so. (for yourself and your family) …. if the DOT/Mortgage is as they say a “Death Pledge”
Judge Rinder on FIDICIARY DUTY to protect trusts
FEB 19 2017 Visiter No.641700 to mike/ann's www.opg.me 9 years GONE ME & MUM ABROAD
'PASSING OFF' is a common law tort crime when someone or something purports to be something it is not or NOT the original that is seeking to GAIN in any way.. I today make allegation under common law that todays justice system is set up to benefit those that seek to gain as 'passing off' as a justice system that is NOT the real thing!!
gary: woodger has been lieing through his back teeth about a claim submitted by mike:clarke on the 19th december 2016 in which we will document here on this site in a pdf file soon. In the meantime our in person visit to RCJ Queens Bench was told by woodgar to fill in an N1 with an EX160 now done and submitted tomorrow by email plus an formal complaint of malfeasance about woodgar.
FEB 12 2017 Visiter No.641497 to mike/ann's www.opg.me POLICE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT click here to ENLARGE
CLEAR EXAMPLE 1 year ago this month STILL AWAITING COURT PROVIDE REMEDY FOR SUCH LIES For those unsure try reading the 700 comments and in there lies the truth how the MAIL did not cover the real story of the truth but instead sensationalised it with its content of lies that the public comments clearly saw through seeing the obvious large holes in the story.
FEB 8 2017 Visiter No.641400 to mike/ann's www.opg.me COMPLAINT TO POLICE ABOUT MP EXCHANGE EMAILS
FEB 7 2017 Visiter No.641355 to mike/ann's www.opg.me FILE YOUR OWN SUIT AS COMMON INFORMER
Ireland's justice system is in moral crisis. Rampant nepotism, cronyism and other forms of corruption have ensured that many who inhabit the corridors of power are getting away with serious and repeated wrongdoing with apparent impunity. It remains an open secret here in Ireland that if the perpetrators of crime are in any way 'connected' or in the pay of the State, that our justice system is far more likely to throw up a wall of protection and denials around them - than to expose and prosecute them. This is where this little book comes in. This book details a free and simple legal process whereby you or I can take immediate and effective action against any other person who commits a crime against us. And if that other person happens to be a Garda, a lawyer, an 'Officer of the Court' or a Government Minister - well, all the more reason perhaps to take firm and immediate action - right? This latest Integrity Ireland publication focuses on the little-known but long-established Common Informer legislation and how the ordinary citizen can prosecute others without having to rely on the Gardai or the Office of the DPP. YOU can prosecute ANYONE as long as you have proof of a criminal offence. You do NOT need to go to the Gardai. You do NOT need a solicitor or a barrister. And best of all, the process is free! This book explains all you need to know, including a breakdown of recent Supreme Court rulings and a step-by-step explanation of the process, as well as all those things you need to watch out for as 'they' do their utmost to deny us justice. This little book - and the process it explains - could well prove to be the proverbial 'Achilles heel' of a very unjust, justice system."
FEB 7 2017 Visiter No.641343 to mike/ann's www.opg.me FOLLOW UP POLICE COMPLAINT ABOUT MP GORDON MARSDEN
FEB 3 2017 Visiter No.641250 to mike/ann's www.opg.me UCC 1 FINANCING STATEMENT - COURTS IN CLOSED SHOP Glenn Wayne Here's what I have to say about financing statements. This is queen Elizabeth's form. A UCC -1 is probably the most powerful financing statement (commercial lien) in the world. The corrupt corporate courts at the Corporate STATE or federal level are not following their own rules or their own admiralty/maritime commercial system the BAR attorneys have set up and put in place for us to use. These private administrative tribunals are seldom properly monitored, the foreign AGENTS get away with dishonoring the American people.
The State, so-called judges in these private administrative tribunals will never honor anything you have filed on a UCC-1 financing statement and I can almost guarantee you that a federal judge will not pay attention to your UCC-1's or UCC-3's either. Even though you are "holding the claim" a perfected claim and accounts receivable under the UCC with all the supporting exhibits behind it (DEFAULT notice, 30-60-90 invoices, etc.), the federal court clerk or judges will not pay any attention to it so don't waste your FRN's.
I have an 8" stack of Certified and State Secretary of State sealed, UCC financing statements (with supporting exhibits) filed against public officials and corporations in the Connecticut commercial recording division along with many Apostilles (Hague Treaty) and certifications but they are not enforceable and carry no weight.
I have filed them into federal court case "evidence files" (federal jacket) that I opened and instructed the federal judge to rule on all the certified copies (evidence) of the fault and default notices from the public records (FRCP, Rule 902) including UCC financing statements and every motion was ignored including my evidence, fact and law....
Depending upon which of the fifty states you are domicile, an Affidavit of Obligation, Notice of Claim of Lien or a UCC-1 financing statement filed on PUBLIC RECORD as PUBLIC NOTICE will not be honored or enforced against a public official in a private administrative tribunal of admiralty (so-called court). Even the federal so-called judges will not enforce your liens or allow you to collect on a perfected claim or accounts receivables without a club membership to the private BAR.
I have filed a Lis Pendens in federal court without a BAR card and they no longer have any force or effect. Don't waste your time or resources filing any of these documents. Trust me... The office of judge in America today is VACANT.
The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals just steals your $455.00 filing fees. What is the point of taking all of your writs of certiorari up to the Supreme Court and waste more time and resources? After all, only approximately 70-80 writs for every ten-thousand filed are reviewed by the justices each year.
Cross your fingers that your UCC 1 lien, your county recorder's office "Notice of Claim of Lien" or Lis Pendens with the federal court clerk will have some force and effect in law and will be honored because you have no enforcement.
I don't believe that the proper filing and recording of a "commercial lien will afford you any leverage and commercial liens do not have the force or effect that they used to hold. Neither does a properly filed Lis Pendens with the federal court clerk.
If you file a Notice of Claim of Lien against a so-called judge or other public official, it will either be ignored or removed with a bogus letter to remove it by a low-level clerk in the Supreme Court house using Supreme Court letterhead. Attorneys do this as a favor for other BAR members and their corporate cronies in the PUBLIC. It is called "tampering with PUBLIC records". No accountability.
There is not any "enforcement" of your perfected claims, commercial liens and accounts receivables past ninety day (due and owing) are not collectable because you have no enforcement. It is highly unlikely that you will find a legitimate, de jure judge who will honor your administrative fault and default process or exhaustion of administrative remedies so don't get your hopes up especially when the so-called "courts" are all running a closed shop now.
The commecial courts are all running a closed union shop. If you do not have a private club membership to the foreign BAR Association, you will not be allowed to play in their game. No BAR card = no play. All my filing fees in the past were basically stolen and all my excellent motions and knowledge of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and the FRCP'S Supplemental Rules of Admiralty for certain asset and forfeiture claims Rules A-G were ignored because I am not on their "team." You or I no longer have access to an Article III court of law.
COURTS HAVE BEEN MONOPOLISED BY THE BAR!
- Without prejudice, without recourse -
FEB 2 2017 Visiter No.641234 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THE SYSTEM IS BUILT ON FRAUD!! An arrest for “failure to appear”, when no man –only a trust account– was ever charged, is a violation of human rights under the International Bill of Human Rights (IBHR), Article 9 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Show me the law which proves I have to go to court or show me the paper I signed which proves I agreed to. Neither exists.
Under the IBHR, (UDHR #6 and ICCPR #16) we have the right to be recognized, everywhere, as a “person” before the law. We also have the right to WAIVE that right. As Canada and the United States are both signatories to the IBHR, so then, all court officers are bound by this “International Law” which trumps all other “laws” which are only corporate statutes.
The entire court system is commercial fraud. Under the guise of a “crime”, the Crown (prosecutor) charges the Name/trust account, NOT the man, and a constructive trust/court case is created. Only trustees, who have legal title to the trust, can access trust funds, but only via the authorization of the beneficiaries –us, who have equitable title. The only charges we authorize are the ones for our benefit. Maxim of Law: “The one who creates the liability must provide the remedy”. This means that the prosecutor is liable for unauthorized charges against a trust. So, the prosecutor is in violation of Criminal Breach of Trust, and obtaining execution of valuable security by fraud.
They do not want to be liable for THEIR debt to OUR trust accounts. They unjustly enrich themselves and then, by deceiving us into acting as trustee (surety), via intimidation, threat, coercion and fraud, force us to pay, one way or another.
NO case ever has anything to do with justice; it is ALL about ACCOUNTING, SURETY and ‘money’; the court NEVER has jurisdiction; the entire case is FRAUD!
14.1.2013 - My choosing of my own representation [Roger Hayes][Guy Taylor] was thrown out of court by security clearly showing BIAS after the jurisdiction of the court was challenged under common law, the Judge left the court and returned only after my representation was removed therefore in a display of inequality at arms I was left defenceless in a BIAS UNFAIR PARTIAL to Pannone LLP maritime FRAUDULENT hearing to commit to prison by a JUDGE who was on the PAYROLL of the COURT of PROTECTION whom is at the centre of the allegations of FRAUD THEFT MAL ADMINISTRATION and now persecution and harassment!! The executive, The Bar have monopolised the court system into their own club, better described as racketeering!
JAN 21 2017 Visiter No.640900 to mike/ann's www.opg.me STOP THE PIRATES ITS ALL ABOUT BONDS
In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond. AUTOTRIS CUSIP DTCC
IT IS ALL ABOUT BONDS
What they’re doing in these courts is all about Bonds. When you go into the courtroom after you’re arrested, they use two different sets of Bonds. What they do when your arrested they fill out a “Bid Bond”. The United States District Court uses 273, 274 & 275. SF = “Standard Form”. Standard Form 273, Standard Form 274 & Standard Form 275. This is the United States District Court.
There is another set of Bonds and they are all put out by GSA = General Services Administration. I’m just talking off the top of my head because I have all of this stuff memorized. GSA Form SF24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond” is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A and put out by the GSA.
O.K. So, what are they doing with these Bonds? What’s going on in the courtroom is that they are suing you for a debt collection. If you look at these Bonds, everyone of these Bonds: the “Bid Bond”, the “Performance Bond” & the “Payment Bond”, all have a “PENAL SUM” attached to it. The reason for the “Penal Sum” is if you don’t pay the Debt, you go into “Default Judgment”.
That is what is going on in the courtroom. That is why all of these guys are sitting in prison wondering what’s going on! If you go in and argue jurisdiction or refuse to answer questions that the judge or the court addresses to you, they will find you in contempt of court and they will put you in jail. What they do is arrest you, then they hold you, basically until the suit has been completed. Once they get “Default Judgment” on you because of your failure to pay the Debt, they put you in prison. Theattorneys are there to create a smoke screen.
What attorneys have been trained to do is to lead you into “Dishonor” or “Default Judgment”. Then the court puts you into prison then they sell your “Default Judgment”.
Who do they sell it to?
Believe it or not, the U.S. District Court buys all of these State Court Judgments. I don’t know why noone has found this out before. There are about 300 “re-insurance” companies that buy these bonds. They are all ‘insurance” companies. These are the people that are buying these Bonds when you went into “Default Judgment” and they cannot buy these Bonds unless they are Certified by the Secretary of the Treasury.
What are they doing with these Bonds? They have regulations governing these Bonds – there are 2,000 regulations governing these Bonds.
Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments - anything you put your signature on is a Negotiable Instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code which is the Lex Mercantorium. Its Mercantile Civil Law.
The reason they use Lex Merchantorium in the court room is because everyone of you are Merchant’s at Law and Merchants at Law is anyone who holds themselves out to be an expert.Because you use commercial paper on a daily basis, you are considered to be an ‘expert’. This is also why they are not telling you what is really going on in the courtroom. You are presumed to know this stuff because you hold yourself out to be an expert by using commercial paper every day.
Every time you put your signature on a piece of paper, you are creating a Negotiable Instrument. Some are Non-Negotiable and some are Negotiable. Every time you endorse something, you are acting as an accommodation party or an accommodation maker under UCC 3-419.
An accommodation party is anyone who loans their signature to another party. Read UCC 3-419, it tells you what an accommodation maker is and what an accommodation party is. When you loan your signature to them, they can then re-write your signature on any document they want and that’s exactly what they are doing.
What the Federal Courts are doing is they are buying up these state court default judgments, called ‘criminal cases’ to cover up what they are doing. Actually, they are civil cases.
If you read “Clerk’s Praxis”, you find that what they call ‘criminal’ is all civil, they just call it criminal to cover up what their doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison, bottom line.
I know I’ve been there. EVERYBODY IS FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM: ALL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS ARE FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM.
How many of you have heard of REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust or PZN which means Prison Trust? Prisoners are real estate? They own all the real estate because they hold the Bonds on them. You haven’t redeemed your Bond, so they didn’t close your account.
Here’s what goes on: A contractor comes in or any corporation could come in and tender a Bid Bond to the US District Court and they buy up these court judgments and anytime you issue a Bid Bond there has to be a reinsure. So they get a Reinsurance Company to come in and act as Surety for the Bid Bond, then they bring in a Performance Bond. All of these Bonds; Bid, Payment & Performance are all Surety Bonds and anytime you issue a Bid Bond it has to have a Surety guaranteeing or reinsuring the Bid Bond via issuing a Performance Bond.
Then they get an underwriter and that would be either an Investment Broker or an Investment Banker. They come in and underwrite the Performance Bond which is reinsuring the Bid Bond.
What does the underwriter do with the Performance Bond? The underwriter takes the 3 Bonds and pools them and creates what is known as Mortgaged Backed Securities. When you pool these MBS, they are called BONDS and are sold to a company called TBA, which is the Bond Market Association - this is an actual Corporation.
These converted Bonds, now MBS’ are investment securities and being sold the international level. CCA is one of the tickers on the NY Stock Exchange. Others include; CWX, CWD & CWG. When it goes to Frankfurt = CWG, when it goes to Berlin = CWD and so on.
Remember, everything is commercial. 7211 7 CFR says that all crimes are commercial. If you read that carefully it says kidnapping, robbery, extortion, murder, etc. are all commercial crimes. Thus, you are funding the whole enchilada simply because you got into Default Judgment when you went into court and failed to redeem the Bond.
This is why people don’t win in court; cause they don’t redeem the Bond. You are the Principal upon which all money circulates, but you don’t want to start arguing with the court about that.
They are drafting you for performance. So, anytime the court asks you to do something they are drafting you for performance and if you don’t perform, you get into dishonor by non acceptance.They are making a formal presentment under 3-501 of the UCC so they can charge you and they USE the word “charge”. They use the same commercial words on your Indictment, Information and Complaint. They use the word “charge”, i.e., “the following charges”, “…he has two counts of charges”, etc.
Be as gentle as a dove and wise as a serpent. You can’t act like an insurgent or belligerent. If you do, they will treat you like one; they’ll beat you up.
What you want to do is settle the account…go to full settlement and closure; you’re running the account, you’re the Fiduciary Trustee over the account – tell them what to do. You’re the Principal and owner of the account, tell them what to do – tell them you want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go.
In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond.
Here is where to begin: Start with what we call a conditional acceptance.
With the conditional acceptance you can say: “I’m more than happy to give you my name, if you can show that charging papers have been put into the court record. I have not seen any papers that show any charges exist.”
That’s a “Negative Averment”. What you are doing is rebutting the presumption that they have charges against you. They work off presumptions. They don’t have to have anything. You must rebut their presumptions.
I went down there and asked them for the Bid Bond. I said I want the Bid Bond back. I asked for full settlement and closure of the account. It’s your money that they create and the same thing is going on in the Banks and with these Bonds - they monetize these Bonds.
Then ask for legal counsel. The reason why you have to have an attorney, and I cannot emphasize this too strongly, is because the attorney while in a courtroom is they are working on the public side and you are working on the private side. The court cannot talk to you except through your attorney. You need a mouth piece; a microphone. That is what attorneys are - a mouthpiece. Everyone on the Public side is insolvent and bankrupt. You are not.
This is situation is called a Fiction-of-Law. They will not allow you to defeat this “Fiction-Of-Law”. Why? In Admiralty Maritime Law everything is colorable. It has the appearance of being real but is not real.
They will appoint legal counsel for you. You then instruct the attorney that you are doing a “LETTER OF ROGATORY” or letter of advice. This is also called an “Acceptance for Honor” and you want an accounting of what the total amount of the Bill is post settlement and closure of this account.
Then you give your CUSIP and AUTOTIS number and your case number.
Here’s the wording you use: “I accept your charge(s) for Value and Consideration in return for Post Settlement and Closure of Case # , account# 123-45-6789 [put down your 9 digit social security number] and put down CUSIP# [your ssn] & AUTOTRIS# [your ssn w/o dashes]. Please us my exemption for full settlement and closure of this account as this account is prepaid and exempt from levy. (Date it and endorse it as the Authorized Representative.)
(AUTOTRIS means Automated Tracking Identification System. This is the same as your social security number without the dashes. When I said that they didn’t even want to talk to me…when you sayCUSIP & AUTOTRIS they know exactly what you’re talking about. CUSIP is The COMMITTEE ON UNIFORM SECURITIES IDENTIFICATION PROCESSES. . CUSIP uses your Social Security Number to identify you because the Birth Certificate is a Security. It is an investment security and they have all the original Birth Certificates which are registered at the State level with the Department of Human Recourses and then they go to the Department of Commerce and the Federal level and then to the DTC (Depository Trust Corporation).
Judges and lawyers don’t understand commercial law. They do not teach commercial law at law school.They have a special school for them and it’s on a “need to know” basis. The law always assumes that you know, since you were doing this since you were born until you reach the age of accountability, which is 18 years of age or what they call adulthood. If your holding yourself out and using commercial paper on a daily basis, that legal definition makes you an expert or you wouldn’t be using it, so they presume that when you go into the courtroom you know all this stuff.
They have to give you an out. Whenever you create a liability, you always have to create a remedy. They’re on the Public side of the accounting ledger. You are on the Private side.
You have an account and your account is a “Demand Deposit” account and you are insured by the FDIA and the FDIC. The “Federal Depository Insurance Act” which insures the FDIC which is the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation under Title 12; they have a $10 Million Dollar Policy on you and YOU’RE WORTH MORE DEAD THAN YOU ARE ALIVE.
THEY WILL NEVER TELL YOU THIS STUFF!!
NOTE: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.
Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.
The public is encouraged to purchase all kinds of insurance protection when the TRUST actually pays for all physical damages; medical costs; new technology and death benefits. The hype to purchase insurance is a ploy to keep us in poverty and profit off our stupidity because the Vatican owns the controlling interest in all Insurance Companies.
You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST. Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time. Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them. If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it? A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due. Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these Cesta Que Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature
ACTUAL EMAIL From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Justice delayed is justice denied" is a legal maxim meaning that if legal redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury, but is not forthcoming in a timely fashion, it is effectively the same as having no redress at all. This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system, because it is unfair for the injured party to have to sustain the injury with little hope for resolution. The phrase has become a rallying cry for legal reformers who view courts or governments as acting too slowly in resolving legal issues either because the existing system is too complex or overburdened, or because the issue or party in question lacks political favour.
JAN 12 2017 Visiter No.640654 to mike/ann's www.opg.me TODAY WE SEND IN THE 3rd FILING TO OUR COURT A MUST READ OF 7 PAGES
Crown and magistrates’ courts replaced the assize and quarter sessions courts in 1971.
The ‘Report of the Royal Commission on Assizes and Quarter Sessions’ (Sessional Papers, House of Commons, Cmnd 4153, 1966-69, XXVIII, 433) was published in 1969. Chaired by Lord Beeching, the three year investigation identified many problems with the existing criminal justice system. To improve efficiency the report recommended its replacement with a nationally administered court and the Courts Act 1971 incorporated most of the recommendations. As a result, a higher criminal court known as the Crown Court of the Supreme Court of Judicature replaced the assizes and quarter sessions in 1972.
The writ of error coram nobis is strictly a common law writ and does not issue out of a court of chancery
The writ of coram nobis (also known as writ of error coram nobis, writ of coram vobis, or writ of error coram vobis) is the name of a legal order allowing a court to correct its original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error which did not appear in the records of the original judgement’s proceedings and would have prevented the judgment from being pronounced. The term “coram nobis” is Latin for “before us” and the meaning of its full name, quae coram nobis resident, is “which [things] remain in our presence”. The writ of coram nobis originated in the English court of common law in the English legal system during the sixteenth century.
The first known use of the writ of coram nobis in a court of law occurred in England during the 1500s. The writ of coram nobis was identical in nature to a writ of a similar name: the writ of coram vobis. Writs of coram nobis were issued by the court of King's (or Queen’s) Bench while writs of coram vobis were issued by the court of Common Pleas. Both courts were branches of the English judicial system from the 13th century until the late 19th century.
The writ was originally devised in England as a means of rectifying the unjust situation arising from the fact that any allowable method of appeal at common law was limited only to review for errors of law. There were no remedies for errors of fact which were not apparent on the record and unknown to the court at the time of trial, and which would have brought about a different result.
Soon after the passage of the Judicature Acts, it was thought that, when a judgment had been obtained by wilful fraud of the victorious party, the aggrieved party's proper recourse was to bring a new action for fraud, because to try the alleged fraud required original jurisdiction, which the Court of Appeal did not have.
In so ruling, Jessell MR made specific references to the supplemental bill of review, the equitable equivalent of the writ of error contra nobis. However, the Court drew an analogy with the old law, rather than preserving it: in agreeing with Jessell MR, James LJ observed, "...if it is true that there was a fraud practised upon the Court, by which the Court was induced to make a wrong decree, the way to obtain relief will be to bring a fresh action to set aside the decree on the ground of fraud," (emphasis supplied).
Since the coming into force of the Civil Procedure Rules, the law has evolved further. In Noble v Owens, the Court of Appeal held that the modern position is that it is now not necessary to commence a fresh action to cure a judgment fraudulently obtained. Instead, the powers of the Court of Appeal under CPR 52.10 are sufficiently broad to permit the Court of Appeal to refer the determination of the issue of fraud to a Judge of the High Court as part of the appeal proceedings, with a consequent saving of costs.
In criminal cases, the Court of Appeal has allowed appeals and quashed convictions on the basis of misconduct by Crown witnesses analogous to fraud, e.g.: where prosecution witnesses had subsequently been convicted for giving perjured evidence during the original trial; or, where police officers who took confessions from the appellants had subsequently been discredited in later proceedings
Yvonne Taylor It can therefore be seen that the Judicature Acts and the Civil Procedure Rules provide for a comprehensive system of appeals which effectively oust the function served by the former Bill of Review and Writ of Error coram nobis, which may safely be regarded as extinct in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
We most definately must start to raise these issues in court applications to raise the profile of BIAS that is without doubt operating with impunity in our christian courts that we over time have allowed to happen. There should be no talmud masonic jews influence our courts rulings.
JAN 5 2017 Visiter No.640424 to mike/ann's www.opg.me THE STITCH UP/FIT UP OF PETER HOFSCHROER FULL EXCHANGE here
Dear Rev Pike,
So you believe what was said in the papers, & in court, about Peter Hofschroer?
No doubt you believe that Timothy John Evans, Mahmood Marchant, George Kelly, Stefan Kisko, et al, were murderers. It said so in the papers! AND it had been 'proved' in court!
No doubt you also believe that Britain is a a 'Democracy', with concern for 'Human Rights', & 'The Rule of Law'?
My, you really are gullible! Mind you, I've no room to talk.
Until the age of 70, I was as gullible as you are. I believed (as I had been told all my life), that 'British Judges, & the British Legal System Are the Finest in the World'.
I'm ashamed I was so gullible for so long - & you should be too!
FROM the age of 70 came a succession of shocks, all my lifelong beliefs shattered, as I began to learn that the British courts are corrupt from top to bottom: that they are run by a Legal/Judicial Mafia. And they will go to ANY lengths to silence those who are exposing them & their cronies, as Peter Hofschroer had been doing!
If you want to believe what was said by the conscienceless shysters who were prosecuting Peter in that Quisling Court, that is up to you.
But did you not know that Britain is supposed to be run according to the European Convention on Human Rights, & Britain's own Human Rights Act?
In this context, Article 6 (the Right to a Fair Trial) is most important.
And that Quisling Court 'Trial' was as far from being 'Fair' as it is possible to be!
Regardless of Peter's guilt or innocence, regardless of whether there was a word of truth in the allegations against him, if Britain was run with anything approaching the 'Rule of Law', or concern for the 'Human Rights' we are supposed to have, his conviction could not be allowed to stand (Note: I said 'IF'. sadly, it is not, & there isn't).
So, dear Reverend, I don't know what they taught you in Theological College, but, IF you are willing to learn, your education can begin now. You could make a start by googling 'Norman Scarth Pictures'. After that, if you have any questions, I will be pleased to answer them (I am an authority on skulduggery in the courts).
JAN 3 2017 Visiter No.640375 to mike/ann's www.opg.me CLASS ACTION STARTED ON PROPERTY FRAUD 10 pages here
JAN 3 2017 Visiter No.640371 to mike/ann's www.opg.me CONFIRMATION REQUESTED FROM RCJ QB OF DELIVERY
JAN 2 2017 Visiter No.640363 to mike/ann's www.opg.me I AM GOING TO MAKE A FEW SHORT STATEMENTS We start by expressing our current position. We are living at the minute in Thailand where we feel safe, warm and relaxed and can attempt yet again to gain our own court to have ourselves heard by jury the injustices that are upon us keeping us in exile from our home country. Last year 2016 as with the previous years we expected to find the remedy so desperately needed once and for all but to date it has evaded us only showing and proving that in 2017 the courts are inadequate and corrupt only providing justice to those that have money and that can then engage with this system. Over the years of studying this tragedy the actual dirt filth and grime within the system has been uncovered and it is'nt a pretty sight infact it's downright ugly as it borders on the satanic evil that no one wants to talk about. MASONIC ZIONIST JEWs running our christian courts, is a reality and anyone whom dare to speak of such will feel the establishment closing of ranks to exclude you from any representation and or justice of any sort and if your in any doubt just read 2016 page and its statements and filings to courts by recorded delivery that have been ignored with shear contempt and misconduct of public office committing TREASON with impunity. The fact is, that a masonics OATH is a blatant contradiction to the public oath of office taken and therefore causes BIAS by judgements usually in their own cause, this is why the only potentially fair unbiased and impartial court is by JURY.
JAN 1 2017 Visiter No.640362 to mike/ann's www.opg.me 4TH HAPPY NEW YEAR EXILED FROM THE UK If you want to read 2016 click here Otherwise this is the new 2017 start for this site where we again hope with others to find remedy.
THE NUTS/BOLTS OF OUR EVIDENCESENIOR MASTER JUDGE DENZIL ANTON LUSH (born 18/7/1951 Southsea, Hants) - in holding the ultimate fudiciary responsibilty to demonstrate there being no fraud or breach of contract of the 1st general order where he stated; “The reasonable fees and expenses of a professional receiver are
recoverable from the defendant in the personal injury action as a head of damage. They do not
simply fall on the patient’s fund.” & for ignoring the doctors reports stating my mother had capacity from the beginning and then sending his own corrupt doctor whom did not conduct a clinical examination. Also for his collusion with the perpetrator of further crimes, his appointed deputy...
DEPUTY RECEIVER & CROOK HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES ( born on 24/06/1955 ) and his failure to account as to what had happened to £1.1 million pounds inclusive of his breach of contract in the 1st general order stating; “the family should rest assured that my costs will not be eroding
the capital settlement agreed for their mothers care and other specific needs.” & his 'fraud by false representation' when the patient emigrated outside the jurisdiction of England & Wales losing £100,000 of the client funds in exchange rate losses in a 'neglect of duty'. meeting 07.02.2011 - meeting 18.07.2011 - others to follow
MARTIN JOHN - the then chief executive of the Office of the Public Guardian and his failure to provide a proper detailed investigation showing good reasons to show there was no theft fraud mal administration.
CHIEF CONSTABLE PETER FAHY for his failure to investigate a reported white collar crime of Theft Fraud and Mal administration and also provide a crime reference number on the 4 occasions it has been asked for. Further today 30/11/2013 Six out of 10 crimes are not investigated, admits Sir Peter Fahy
JUDGE PETER ARTHUR BRIAN JACKSON (born 9 December 1955), for his failure to take account of the LIVING WILLthat he authorised mums capacity to make & then after reading it where he later then, ring fenced her property giving an order that it could not be sold in her lifetime, so that she could not do with it as she pleased with her living will executorwilfully breaching 'part 24' of the WILLS act 1837 & also right to a private life Article 8 of ECHR.
JUDGE ADMINISTRATOR Philip Mark Pelling QC and so called "Nominated COURT OF PROTECTION Judge" whom conducted a TREASONOUS, BIASED, UNFAIR administrative statute tribunal, WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY & without the consent of all parties where he abandoned the court to have our representation thrown out by security after they claimed common law jurisdiction and requested a JURY after which he returned to hand down a 3 month prison sentence to the protected party/CARER of 17 years flying in the face of statute Mental Capacity ACt 2005 section 5 and thus the protection of carers from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a so called patient of the court of protection whom
HOLDS CAPACITY! Watch a video statement by my representation to radio station of 7mins
NOTE:There has been no published judgement I wonder WHY?
READour submission to the House of Lords select committee meeting on Mental Capacity Act, Committee. Where this submission along with lots of others containing vital evidence have been returned, deleted or just unread because Chairman LORD HARDIE said, 'they contain NAMES'!!! So er, hang on if you go to the POLICE as we have and do not give a name how can they investigate... not that the POLICE do anyway as they too will not even give reference numbers/log numbers!! The term to remove let's say sensitive information is called REDACTION would it not have been the most polite thing to do is remove the names but keep the evidence that the most vulnerable, 'hands on' people, suffering at the hands of the Mental Capacity Act could be heard!! What we have here LORD HARDIE is another whitewash dismissing the most vulnerable people in another act of FRAUD! Read the 1st general order of the 20.03.2001 pdf in particular the highlighted paragraphs.
READ the Sibling's lack of CREDABILITY statements 19.1.2012.
In 1998 READ the Total Original Claim of £1.7 million and in it you will see the schedule for receiver costs based on the full claim & a lifespan of 83(not 70 as stated by deputy HUGH JONES). You will see also the setup costs schedule of £4000(not £26,377 as was charged by HUGH JONES).
The reduced compromised settlement was £775,000. You can see where an appeal on the grounds of capacity was unsuccesfully made with 2off 4 hour clinical specialists stating my mother had capacity READ here & this Dr's back up telephone converstaion to Listen to, stating my mother should not be under that court.
You can Listen here to the 40 minute!! unclinical exam from the state's court, a Doctor Khan, that was the pinacle deciding factor for DENZIL LUSH(Matser of the court) to keep mum under the court.
10 years later & we commissioned 2 more doctors of 4 hour exams claiming my mother still has capacity READ the 2010 & READ the 2011.
So on and so forth... if you take the time to read the diary here from the bottom to the top it will demonstrate the shear corruption and evil forces at work upon the vulnerable. Further, that the whistleblower, whom just so happens to be the long standing carer of 17 years and eldest son, is in for stitch up & persecution from the judiciary that will lead to a corrupt prison sentence, where the establishment closes ranks to protect itself using a bent judicial system to meter out what they would term as purged rehabilitation. BIAS is unlawful in a court of law but here it exudes itself, brimming to overfull, and with impunity, where an 'admiralty administrative statute hearing' calling itself the 'court of protection' gives clear focus in the lack of FAIRNESS and IMPARTIALITY boasting it's BIAS without any fear.
My mother's vacant property, slowly degrading, stands now as a monument to the hypocrisy of UK INJustice, once renowned internationally, that's degenerated into a mafia run racket, committing financial rape on vulnerable people, where the rule of COMMON LAW has been tossed onto the scrap heap infavour of their own BIASED legalese of statutes conducting itself without IMPARTIALITY and FAIRNESS no doubt leading to an uprising of social unrest that the evidence is already here to see by the pockets of growing organisations of rebellion.
There are several criminals in this saga but our case would lay the main injustice allegations with 4 co conspiritors, that being No1 SENIOR JUDGE DENZIL LUSH(master of the court of protection & the person with ultimate fudiciary responsibilty) No2 Solicitor HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES(Deputy receiver whom clear evidence here points to him being the crook in the frame) & No3 PHILIP MARK PELLING QC(Stitch up facilitator) and co ordinator as a NOMINATED Court of Protection Judge to remove any whistleblowers to prison by any crooked method using BIASED means, lacking impartiality and fairness with hearsay allowed, without prosecution witnesses in a tribunal lacking CONSENT & a requested Jury where your own representation has no right of audience and is thrown out. No4 HONOURABLE JUSTICE PETER JACKSON who we have just added(25.09.2013) due to his inability to recognise the injustice and act HONOURABLY in fact quite the contrary JACKSON ignored the LIVING WILL that he authorised my mother's capacity to make and then he RING FENCED the property in a FRAUD cover up facilitated by LAND REGISTRY.
Mr Jackson has stated openly that “Start Quote [The law is]
completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been
devised” End Quote… but yet he also is stated on wikipiedia as a person who is a "master tactician (link)[who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not," where here these TYRANTS ("one who rules without law, looks to his own advantage rather than that of his subjects, and uses extreme and cruel tactics—against his own people as well as others") are stalking me, & my mothers house/home READ. ALL four TYRANTS are paid from the racketeering products of the FRAUDULENT Court of Protection/NEGLECTION/CORRUPTION.
PRIVACY NOTICE: Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the USA & United Kingdom Government/Courts also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photo's or any other "picture" art posted on here. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this site and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this site are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.
UCC 1-103 1-308
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
This is the website of an OPG patient with CAPACITY
and her son - carer.
A few words about us, our website and its slogan "He who cares, wins!"
Mp3 recorded meeting of 1HOUR 18.07.11 that clearly shows the start of the process to steal my mothers home
06.10.11 OPG Rep: Meeting Recorded - LISTEN to it.(2HRS)
In June 1995 my mother Ann was 55 - After a long period of depression tried to end her life but tragically it ended her as we knew her & she only awoke from her coma 11 months later to find her new existance as a disabled woman needing 24hr care.
Mike was from a Entreprenaur backround of Nightclubs Pubs, Tourism and Hotel life suddenly found himself to be that very carer at the age of 37.
After the obvious glaring failures committed by the ROYAL OLDHAM HOSPITAL a lawsuit case against them was launched in 1995 and some 6 years later in 2001 a compromised out of court settlement of damages was awarded in excess of £775,000. Mum, after 11months in hospital was discharged to a nursing home but the pain to the family of seeing her in there of only a few weeks brought about the decision to care for her at our own homes initially shared for a short period by my sister and I. In 1997 I took on the roll of full time carer and have done so to date, a period of 16 years.
The Website History -
This site has been launched because we emigrated permanent(March 2008) but find that mums estate is still trapped in the UK and as such our security back up when things are not right, of referring to our MP will be removed and thus our spanish option leaves us with a language barrior problem. Therefore we decided to place the correspondence in the public domain to be judged by all. These link files to the left in column 1 are being documented in reverse order from whatever is todays date, in other words the latest current documents are on the top of the list and because the launch date of this site was only the 3rd April 2010 more and more information will be added over time as its our intention to expose the fundamental misgivings of the original intentions of the COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Anyone can see clearly if pouring over these documents an understanding of the where the name change came from with reference to NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION. We hope this website can also help others whom have serious problems with the OPG and its affiliated deputy's. Its my personal experience in many cases that money is horded away from the patient only to serve as inheritance to relatives whom played little or no role in the care of the affected patient ensuring the best possible existance to the end of their days. My own mother's award was predicted to have only lasted 10 years and her award was based on that prediction and its a testament to good care that her life expectancy is exceeding this prediction by far but that it would not do if constricted by the narrow brush approach of deputies hording vast sums of money away only to protect their long term fees and charges which are vastly in excess usually of what was supposed to have been laid down guidelines from the OPG.
We spent 6 years fighting a court case to get the award and then only to spend then next 10 years fighting the receiver to get it off him. Our lives are permanently blighted by the ongoing struggle in which the original award was supposed to solve. We cannot understand how, in 2010, a little known about corrupt UK government body can continue doing what they do in an unaccountable secret fashion, with lack of transparency and openness that the Cameron/Clegg government is currently promoting.
Though there is today (110410) still alot to resolve we do have a level of life to enjoy where we now live, in the Costa Del Sol, never to return again to the corrupt country from where we were born, THE UK unless of course its by the intimidatory way they are handling our finances and effectively continually trying to blackmail us into returning to the UK.
A testament to good care mum is still going strong at 70 years of age recently on the 9th August 2010 taken during a birthday meal in Benalmedina, Spain.
SOME OF THE FAMILY HISTORY
Born in Middleton, Manchester in 1940 the eldest one of seven mum fast grew up having to learn the rigors of life & at the age 16 she found love married and moved in with her new husband a journey the would last 36 years.
Mum never knew her real father he was missing at war presumed dead, when at the end of the war he returned only to find my mums mum, Grandma pregnant with another mans child whom then decided to leave. Mums real father also left and never returned, he went on to become a Director on the board of British Aerospace a person whom never came to see, find or even acknowledge his own 2 daughters.
With three children and now alone my mums mum, Grandma eventually found another love whom fathered a further four more children with her. My mother being the eldest of seven was very soon helping at an early tender age to look after and bring up her siblings virtually as an additional mother to them
After marriage at 16 mum at 19 gave birth to me, 3 years later my sister and one year later my brother. Our family was VERY close. My sister and I bonded more and more over time. I remember all going out at night to our local for evenings all as one close family for many happy times. When I reached 16 I knew I was Gay I confided in my sister, mother and father but chose to pacify them all by saying I was bisexual and dating girls until the age of 26. For ten whole years I struggled to accept that I was never really bisexual at all and the pain that brought resulted in relentless up and down depressive symptoms, which on reflection were burdened on to my mother. She carried them times for me very much where suicide was a frequent consideration and she helped me thro to better times. This was a debt to my mother for which it became easier to repay when she needed me after her life changing accident in 1995.
At the age of 26 I suddenly became concious of the fact that I am what I am and that was the end of my relationships with women that tormented me from being the person I really was. From this point on depression for me became a thing of the past and I personally believe it was my mother whom helped carry me thro that ten year period in my life.
Our upbringing was of a working class family background on predominantly a council estate but that my father thro his business ideas directed several businesses giving me a true insight to that side of life. We were if you like, "bigger fish" in a small pond, respected by the neighbours and life was relatively good though there were lean times especially when my father went bankrupt, a period in his life I swore I'd never go thro.
In 1994 whilst I was directing my own four independant small businesses it became very apparent that my parents marriage was suffering and it was evident on their faces, eventually leading to divorce papers and seperation. It was at this point that mum started a period of depression that would lead up to her near fatal suicide attempt on 23rd June 1995 whilst in my presence in front of my house. I was 36. I only started to enjoy my life from the age of 26, 10 years I held dear, a very good and happy 10 years, but it was over!
Mum had deliberately ran under a 32 ton truck with an extra trailor attached at the rear, I really don't know how but she went under the middle section and only one of it's 18 wheels caught her left foot and caused some damage but unfortunately her skull was fractured. She then had continuous brain swelling over 24 hrs. Her coma lasted months and months, her prognosis was very poor and she was expected to die but her fighting spirit and prayers kept her alive.
I on the other hand lost all fighting spirit, I tryed to continue with my businesses for months but eventually it got to me with flashbacks and depression. Caring for mother slowly over time became the top priority not by choice but by nesseccity. Lives had changed for ever at a stroke June 1995.
I went on to spend an inordinate amount of time energy and fighting spirit to help mum to learn how to talk again and walk again against all odds given by doctors whom had given up. You can clearly see the results 15 years on by the pictures above of mum now 70. All this though has ruined my own life and existence as an entreprenaur and has robbed me of my dignity where personal wealth is concerned. If mum suddenly died I will be left homeless and destitute with nothing but yet I will of created lots of fat cat lawyers fees over the years with an inheritance bonus for waiting relatives. Is this right? I don't think so! Thus I now am hated and dispised by relatives and the courts because I am here fighting my corner for what I believe to be right, some justice for RELATIVE CARERS IN PRIVATE DAMAGES AWARDS.
Some peace at THE MOMENT in our new home, September 2010 but how long for?
Back to top
Where would you rather live, be honest! Should mum be put in a old folks home, should she be in her rainy home town of Oldham, forced to live in her daughters back bedroom or do you just believe she's in the right place? This is what I am fighting to maintain for mum, what she truely deserves. Its her money to spend on how she wants to live, its not there for others to run up solicitors bills squabbling and it certainly ain't there for inheritance! How long our life will exist we do not know as the background currently is a concotion of corrupt statements trying to discredit my care for mum on a welfare and financial basis in order to deprive mum of her liberty living and cared for by me, her son abroad where she has capacity to choose where and with whom she wants to live with.
Taken today at the golf course 161210 mum wanted a taste of what the golfing fuss is all about would she get this sort of treatment in a home - I doubt it extremely.
JUST A NOTE FOR THE WEEK 09.06.2011 The money I now receive personally each week that is classed as expenses and as such mums deputy will not pay it as a wage because he said it would cost more for mum as she would pay tax on it. Well interesting that isn't it. Whilst normal folk whom do a job get a wage slip I don't and when I go to open a bank account they say well Mr Clarke where is your income and when I point to it they say thats not proper income Mr Clarke. Likewise how can one proceed proper with one's life for example how does one get a mortgage so as to have your own property over your head. If my mother lacks the capacity to recognise these things then why is it that she wants to display her concern by trying to gift her pproperty by way of JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY & why can't the British government along with its corrupt establishment see it all, or can they?. Its very obvious really whom the theives are in all this mess but who'd of thought that in 2011 in Britain, this would be going on, but it is!
The court of protection say well if your abroad you can apply to take charge of your mother affairs in that country and when you have done it apply to the UK courts to have the assets and cash released to you but they fail to recognise that in reality my mother has nothing to prove in another country why should she demonstrate to the UK government her capacity or lack of when they hold no jurisdiction in the country of her residence. They are in reality extending their jurisdiction without it being legal in any way. In the meantime their corrupt deputies do there dirty work whilst your outside of the UK. My god, so corrupt its unreal. I spoke to lawyers here in Spain they advised that the cost of an application would possibly exceed £3000 and only have a 50/50 chance of success. So where does one start? Not very nice to think that your own country is effectively screwing you over and taking advantage of the elderly whom clearly have the capacity to manage their own finances.
Taken today 9.06.11 this is what mum sees to be the type of "home" she wants to reside in till she dies. This is our current rented property in Spain that we have been negotiating to swap with mums UK property but as soon as mums deputy got wind of it he tried to sell her UK property for figures approaching £100,000 less than its value and this is the type of thing your up against!
F.A.C.T Families Against Court of Protection Theft is an organisation of those who have had problems dealing with the Court of Protection (CoP) and Office of Public Guardian (OPG) and are based in the UK. There has been 15,735 recorded complaints of abuse, fraud and corruption from Dec 2001- Dec 2010 (9 years) of the CoP and OPG in the UK.
There are over 50,000 people plus their families affected by these abuses of the Court of Protection, Office of Public Guardian and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) jurisdiction which is also part of the Court of Protection and many young adults who may have autism or aspergers have been wrongfully put under this jurisdiction depriving them from their liberties. Some people would most definitely dispute that these disorders should not even come under Mental Health and whether these young adults are even a threat to anyone.
The Court of Protection and the Office of Public Guardian are a Government run Court based in Archway Tower, Archway, London. It deals with property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity or who are unable to make decisions for themselves. Those deemed to lack capacity are many Elderly people who may suffer from Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Disabled People, Road Accident victims awarded compensation and even young adults who maybe Autistic or suffer from Asperger's Syndrome.
The Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian are responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of Enduring Powers of Attorney, and Lasting Powers of Attorney, appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.
However we are very concerned with the way it is run and from recent press such as
As well as police corruption shown by Hoddesdon/Hertford police force as they protect the corrupt, accept bribes and even come to court and lie on Oath. Not to also mention corruption by all those we have reported to and are doing absolutely nothing. This includes SRA, Legal Ombudsman, Parliamentary Ombudsman, all our MPs, House of Lords and all our police forces. It is beyond a national DISGRACE!
Further articles to show Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian Corruption:
Flaws in the Court of Protection (CoP) were highlighted in a negative press campaign last autumn 2010. The CoP and the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) shared more than 4,000 complaints about its operations over the last two years. It is still being accused of mismanaging £2.7 billion it controls and which is held on behalf of those who no longer have capacity (Ps). Critics claim that it holds the money in a Bank of England account paying 0.5% a year rather than at High Street banks which would provide rates of three per cent. As inflation takes hold it leaves families with an income deficit needing to dig into the capital set aside for a lifetime of care.
The newspapers' campaign
An eye catching headline in the Mail on Sunday described the CoP as "The Secret Court of Living Hell". Case histories investigated in the newspaper's campaign included:
•An application to the CoP for money to pay fees for residential care taking too long to be processed. P's house sale proceeds were paid into an account held by the court. The money took five months to come through and was £10,000 short of the £35,000 which was required. The aggrieved relative said he was never able to speak to the same person twice about the matter.
•P was awarded £1.6 million. When her father died an application was made by her mother to take over from him as the person authorised to run P's financial affairs. The fees came to around £42,000 for solicitors, barristers and accountants.
•P's house sale proceeds were transferred into the wrong account. The mistake was only discovered when there was a request to pay P's care home fees.
•An administration charge of £4,100 to access £5,800 out of the £90,000 held by the CoP. P, a former solicitor suffering from bi polar disorder, complained requests for money which were supposed to take six weeks were taking five months and that the payments received were less than asked for.
•The father of an eight year old boy who had been awarded £4.2 million as a result of medical negligence was accused of being abusive to an official from the CoP on a home visit although nobody had visited him at their home.
There were complaints in particular about delays, expense, the long and obscure court forms, inefficiency and that the court was a remote entity serving itself. These were accelerated by the press attaching links to the articles censuring the Court. In The Mail alone 450 further accusations of incompetence followed on from one article. Internet forums posted comments that it sent bullying letters and treated relations like criminals. Saga magazine quoted children's author Helen Bateman whose husband was in a coma after an accident: "It is an alien, intrusive, time consuming and costly institution which was completely out of tune with what we were going through".
Court of Protection Rules Committee's Review
In November the then Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, responded to the concerted attacks by the press. A General Election was on the horizon and the Court was being described as an unresponsive Labour monolith working in secret and grinding its users down. Mr Straw asked Sir Mark Potter, the then President of the Family Division, to appoint a Rules Committee to investigate and recommend changes. The committee was chaired by Mr Justice Charles and Mrs Justice Proudman.
The committee met four times in the spring of 2010 and published a report in July 2010. There was recognition of the need for new court forms to be available as quickly as possible. They were to be custom made for the different types of application to avoid containing the lengthy screeds of unnecessary information the original universal forms require. Better explanatory notes are recommended to be attached to the forms as the current ones have led to confusion. Clearer forms would lower the 80% refusal rate for applications received between January 2008 and December 2009 to deal with property and welfare decisions on behalf of the mentally vulnerable. Forty per cent of applications are made by people without professional support. This is a failure in communication and assists those who fear the Court is composed of civil servants and lawyers busy talking to themselves while failing to provide a simple application process. Fortunately the new forms will be road tested in pilot schemes. Their success will depend on using simple English aimed at non-professionals.
A further recommendation is that court officers, rather than judges, should deal with applications concerning non-contentious property and affairs. Previously nominated officers were trained to deal with routine applications and there was lobbying for their return. There is provision for judges to review those decisions and it will make running the Court easier. Other recommendations of the Rules Committee address speeding up and simplifying procedure in response to the complaints of delay.
A key recommendation is that there should be no change in the rules concerning access to proceedings by the public. When and whether the Court should sit in public or permit its proceedings to be made public will be decided in each case by the judge. In March 2010 the Court of Appeal had already handed down a judgement on the application by the press to be permitted access to a hearing concerning Derek Paravicini, described as a human iPod. He is an autistic, high earning pianist living in sheltered accommodation, needing 24 hour care and unable to manage his finances. The press had been agitating against the Court's closed hearings in a high profile campaign. It was held that article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights covered access to information at a court hearing and there could be no blanket exclusions. The Court of Appeal held that decisions on press access should be within the discretion of the judge hearing the case. The Rules Committee followed the case law but decided against blanket open access.
Scrutiny by the public
In May 2010 an open judgment was handed down by Sir Nicholas Wall in DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS  EWHC 1217 concerning a woman aged 55 who had learning difficulties and an overwhelming fear of hospitals and medical treatment. She was deemed not to have mental capacity and unable to make a decision about her treatment. The President ruled that she could be given a drug in a glass of Ribena at her home and detained afterwards on a ward for treatment of cancer of the uterus. Fair reporting in this case though did include Mencap's support for the court's life sustaining decision
This re-opened the continuing debate in the press about the court having sweeping powers handed to it by the Labour government that were not open to scrutiny and openness. Previously decisions about life and death , sterilisations and abortions were made in public and could be reported by the media. Profound questions as to when the State can intervene in private life were aired. Fears were voiced that paternalistic doctors would combine with judges to make vital decisions behind closed doors, thus eroding the rights of the individual. The media continue to oppose blocked access on the basis that it more appropriate for countries whose leaders do not like their authority to be questioned.
Another press campaign led to the naming of a local authority which had treated a vulnerable person and their relations in a high handed manner without authority. The latest judgement released to the press concerned "birth control by force". Mr Jusice Bodey in August 2010 criticised a Midlands council who wanted a married woman aged 29 with an IQ of 53 to be sedated, taken from her home and have birth control imposed on her against her will. The plan to prevent her having children he held had shades of social engineering. There would need to be police involvement and contraception under restraint which he could not authorise under the circumstances
The Court does not have to handle these types of cases often. Public decision making should be encouraged. Ethical life changing decisions ought to reflect current social, rather than legal, values. Keeping people informed reassures them that judges are in tune with the current moral climate and not remote elderly beings living in a world of their own.
Court of Protection's First Report
In June 2010 the Court published its first report, covering its performance between October 2007 and January 2010. The target for an oral hearing within 6 weeks was met in 53% of applications compared with the target of 75%. The Senior Judge explains the shortfall in performance by insufficient Judges. He hoped the appointment of three full time judges in 2010 would help meet targets. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 which created the new Court of Protection did not provide for deputies (part time judges). Full time judges had to be brought in from the regions to cover the London work. The five regional centres were designed to take the hearing centres to the client .This had an impact of the regions that deal with 60% of the work. A more flexible system would be to amend the statute to provide for deputies. They could be drafted in to help with the work flow and be a pool of experienced potential permanent judges.
Applications were analysed. There were 40,000 applications concerning property and affairs and 95% of them did not require court attendance. Forms to apply for a power of attorney had been reduced from 25 pages to 12. There were 2,800 personal and welfare applications with a refusal rate of 80%. There were 13 Deprivation of liberty applications over an eight month period. The general rate of applications was averaging at 1600 per month.
Complaints were addressed. There were 1,672 complaints made about the Court (excluding ones about the OPG taking combined complaints to 4000). These divided into 25% about judicial decisions, 15% about the cost of proceedings, 15% about administrative errors, and 30% about the length of the process and delays. The rate of complaints reduced in the last 6 months and the Senior Judge credits the Court being integrated into HMCS in April 2009 as having had a positive effect.
Performance indicators were divided into three periods of time. There was an improvement in the proportion of applicants contacted within 20 days of receipt of the application (92%), and of those applications meeting the target for paper directions within 16 weeks (77%) but for those within 20 weeks underperforming by 14%. 59% of applications were heard within 6 weeks, a poor performance the Senior Judge hopes will be improved upon. Replies to correspondence within 10 working days were off target by 20% and down to 75%.
The report did not stem criticism. BBC's File on Four, broadcast on 27th of July, focused on new complaints. Parents of disabled children who became 18 had to apply at great expense to be deputies to manage their children's meagre finances and thought their particular situation had been overlooked. A compensation award invested at 0.5% interest instead of 4.5%, the Halifax rate of interest at the time, was bitterly attacked by an accident victim who estimated he had lost £50,000. Another accident victim was awarded £1.5 million and wanted to know the number of hours charged for by her deputy and after 3 months had not been told. The charity Elder Abuse was receiving constant calls to its helpline about fees for unnecessary work and the Court approving too many bills in excess of the £1100 capped rate. Delay in preventing financial abuse was highlighted. The niece of a hospital patient with dementia had taken £300,000 out of P's accounts and conveyed P's home into joint names. It took 3 months to cut off the niece's access to the accounts and no sanctions were taken against her. The Court was attacked for being slow and lenient. The programme concluded that lobbyists like the Court and the public do not.
It is worth remembering the previous Court was also vilified. A Parliamentary Ombudsman Report in 2005 noted poor staff training, high staff turnover, and serious mistakes in managing clients' money. There were poor investments and lost cash leading to compensation claims. Staff often never replied to letters and took months to sort anything out. When complaints mounted up internal memos were written which were "staggering in their arrogance".
Overall the Court is trying to improve. It does have a challenging client base and a large volume of work. Some of the delays maybe due to lawyers not using its emergency provisions (see Urgent Applications in the Court of Protection, Pierce and Jackson (Jordans)). It is admitting shortcomings and attempting to adapt quickly. There are now 2,000 applications per month. Previously the four judges based at Archway could not keep up with the volume of work. Although three new judges were appointed in Spring 2010 none of them had sat as judges before their appointment. Meanwhile two experienced Judges will be leaving by spring 2011. It is likely the Senior Judges optimism for future efficiency is misplaced and there will be more delay.
The media have a grievance about removing its right of access, at time when the culture is towards more open justice and will continue with criticism campaigning to get into the hearings. The pressure group Families Against Court of Protection Theft set up by relations who were unhappy with the CoP is also a vocal critic but has a limited ability to solve the problems of others. Website content such as the OPG's pledge to acknowledge a complaint within two working days, unless it does so, will fuel the flames.
It is hoped the new forms, produced with the benefit of the HMCS's drafting experience, will be an improvement on the OPG's previous efforts and will be comprehensible and user friendly. It has been a very bumpy start. The basement interest rates need to be addressed. The tenor of past complaints has been of faceless bureaucrats making incomprehensible decisions, then failing to communicate about them. Focus should be on running an efficient, responsive, problem solving service for the most vulnerable. For many, the Court is still not serving the most vulnerable but adding to their problems.
Having emigrated to Spain in March 2008 I just want to feel free, normal & happy.
Not overshadowed by the british government.
Human again & not repressed. My son would like his dignity restored not to be discriminated against as a relative carer but to be treated with equality and be paid fair like others. My money should not be in pounds but in euros and because of this its value since moving to Spain has devalued by 80,000 Euro. I should not be forced to live off an exchange rate by the British Government. My liberty and freedom of choice should be respected.
I suffer from dysphasia
People with dysphasia may have difficulty talking, understanding "not me", listening "not me", writing "not me" or doing numeral calculations "not me". They may be mildly or severely affected "not me". Everyday tasks, such as shopping or answering the phone "not me", may be impossible.
People with the condition can
"think clearly and know what they're feeling, and their intellect is maintained."
They're often mistakenly thought to be drunk or mentally confused "not me".
Read 2010 The CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT report on me thats just been delivered and its the second report in 10 years that confirms my capacity. So why am I being treated like a dog by the British Government?
A 4 page report by Dr Hana Al-Hamar 22.05.2001 that was the result of a 4hour examination.
Listen to Dr Hana's comments June 2001.
Dr Khan from the Lord Chancellors Office, 1 hour recording that is unbelievable as to why they keep mum in the Court of Protection 05.09.2001
The latest report in November 2011
Read 31 pages
The carer's work is never done and neither is it paid for!. Discriminated against as a relative carer there is no equality! It's also a 24hr attention span thats needed. I think sometimes, "I'd like to go to the beach for a day but there is'nt enough free time!" We think we'd like a weekend alone visit Morroco or Gibralter but again the tie is there and you can't. When family visit they think they're on holiday so not only are you still waiting on the patient you are also waiting on the family. I sometimes wish they'd say "hey Mike!" we're here you get off for the weekend and enjoy yourselves but "no!".
Treated like hired help but without pay, by your own family is sometimes how it feels. You also feel you have no home, no place of your own and people say well it was your choice but really it were'nt. My mother asked for my care and attention, how could I refuse. My life has been blighted overshadowed, not my own and for what, where is my salary for what I do. Not a wage in sight. Discriminated CARER! Family carer, so you get a benefit that amounts to nothin, but yet outside care can demand £12 an hour. WHY? When a patient is awarded so much money "FOR CARE", why is the family carer not paid his due's. Why is he/she paid a benefit below minimum wage and yet the government allow it to go on.
Whilst fat cat Lawyers, Judges and Courts take their own fat cat fees and wages for their intervention but yet the carer is treated like shit on the end of their shoes! TRUE.
There's something wrong with the system. I calculate for my care over 14 years I am owed £12 per hour for at the very least 14 hours a day 365 days a year 14 years, work that out? £800,000! But if you were just recognised as a working person on minimum wage of £6 that alone would of been £400,000? Whilst other family have built up their worth in property I have not been able to. Its been a mission just trying to work out what I can sell or scrape together each year for an annual holiday but who really gives a shit?
Well I can tell you absolutely no one, accept the people who are in the same boat watching others steal from their relatives estates without transparency, only in secret, accounting to no-one but themselves.
IT HAS TO STOP! The UK government needs to address this with urgency. Someone, somewhere, someday will lose it, mind wise, and someone will die, probably from the pure frustrations that must be building in these people, listened to by no one and I mean no one, or caring about "THE CARERS". Probably because we are a small insignificant minority, but we are gathering strength.
An investigation into a complaint I made on the 4th February 2010 lasted 7 long months, what on earth is going on? I'm sure a murder investigation don't take that long! - Investigation completed the day after I published this statement read the 3 lines Then upon asking for a complete full copy of the investigation passed to legal department whom refused a copy on the grounds of section 40 of the data protection act protecting others.
If I had my time over again knowing what I know now I would have had to refuse my mothers request even though that would of broken my heart. It's took its toll on me over the years but I really blame the UK government for this not my mother whom with all her "so-called" lack of capacity seems to be fully intact to me of which I hold Clinical Neuropsycologists reports to confirm her capacity that have been largely ignored. One day I do believe someone will do something about it and stop this barbarrick inhumane treatment of the people whom CARE the most about the patients.
Damages were awarded for the patients care but its that very standard of care that drops when families become involved because the system is that busy trying to stop famalies having any involvement with the care and money or at least them are the grounds they operate on yet in reality they are protecting their own long term fees whilst under that cover.
The carer whom is caring has no real access and no real say usually because other family whom are protecting their inheritance tend to side with the receivers or courts or worse won't get involved.
There was to my recollection, no money awarded for inheritance and there also was no money awarded for exorbitant fees and charges, so whats gone wrong with the system?
CARE and carers PAY was what the money was awarded for!
In our case one can take note that I personally did the first care of over 5 years before any money was awarded, living off benefits in a 1 bedroomed flat with me sleeping on a sofa! I sometimes think, and my mother the patient also agrees, I should sue her in the courts for back pay. I wonder?
Its ironic when we go out to a restaurant that the patient can order fillet steak but the carer can only afford beans on toast unless the patient issue's a handout. That's how its fealt for me over 15 years just living off handouts, no respect, no dignity, no nothing, treated like dirt when we should be rewarded better than the fat cat lawyers, judges & inheritance hunters etc.
I recently pointed out to the receiver HUGH JONES about the fact there is no wage and he said yes there is its paid in the account and I said its never been pointed out to me its a wage and if it ever was really a wage why has it not been taxed. Fiddling the state out of a tax paid wage I accused him off, with all the cuts that the government are making why are they not stopping carers from claiming benefits when high damages awards have been made to pay for care where that carer can then pay TAX! There has been a constant inbalance in the living standard of the patient to the carer whom as I pointed out that at the time of mums accident in 1995 I was living off an income of £1100 a week from one of my four businesses at that time which was all thrown away in the ensueing disaster in order to prioritise care for mum for free!.
So whats been the point in of it all salvaging the care of one life to ruin your own whilst FAT CAT lawyers and inheritence hunters all get the richer over time. Who is going to take notice of this corrupt system and the discriminatory inequalitys that are blatantly evident today in 2011 for private care damages that were awarded to pay for just that? CARERS! I recently complained to the EHRC The Equality and Human Rights helpline about this very matter and here you read their reply, "The issue that you have regarding care for your mother without payment is not likely to fall within the remit of the Equality Act. It appears that the fact that you are a relative means that you are not entitled to any of the payment award that your mother received to assist with her care.
This is not an equality issue and therefore, we cannot provide any further advice. " Now I ask you? does that not stink of discrimination and where I ask is the equality in that? Its obviously legal in the UK to discriminate against relative carers, no problem at all!
Manchester / Munby Judgement
R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE L & ORS : R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE R & ANOR (2001)
QBD (Admin) (Munby J) 26/9/2001
LOCAL GOVERNMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - FAMILY LAW - HUMAN RIGHTS
JUDICIAL REVIEW : FOSTER CARERS : RELATIVES : FRIENDS : SHORT TERM : LONG TERM : BOARDING-OUT ALLOWANCE : PAYMENTS : FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION : DEPENDENCY : S.8, S.17, S.22, S.23 AND S.26 CHILDREN ACT 1989 : ACCOMMODATION : PLACEMENTS : RESIDENCE ORDERS : LOOKED AFTER : LOCAL AUTHORITY : FOSTER PLACEMENT (CHILDREN) REGULATIONS 1991 SI 1991/;910 : FINANCIAL REPORTS : FOSTERING ALLOWANCES : NATIONAL FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION : NFCA : FOSTER CARE FINANCE : FCF : CARE PROCEEDINGS : WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS : IRRATIONALITY : HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 1950 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : ECHR : ART.8 : RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE : ART.14 : PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION : LEGITIMATE AIMS : PRESSING SOCIAL NEED : PROPORTIONALITY : NECESSITY
A local authority’s policy that financially discriminated against foster carers who were related to the children they fostered was unlawful.
Two joined applications for judicial review of the respondent council’s policy to pay those short-term foster carers who were friends or relatives of a fostered child at a significantly lower rate than other foster carers. Both applications concerned children who were looked after within the meaning of ss.22 and 23 Children Act 1989. In the first application, the maternal grandparents of three children were the children’s long-term foster carers and the children remained with the grandparents after full care orders were made. In the second application, the children were placed with their older half-sister when full care orders were made after an independent social work assessment. The issue was the legality of the policy. The applicants submitted: (i) the council’s policy was a financial disincentive to family members being foster carers and used their sense of moral obligation to compel them to accept a grossly inadequate level of financial support which was lower than the level determined by the council as necessary for the maintenance of other foster children of like age; (ii) the policy was an attempt to apply financial pressure on family members to move away from local authority support; (iii) the policy was discriminatory within Art.14 European Convention on Human Rights and failed adequately to implement the council’s obligation to promote the right to respect for family life guaranteed by Art.8 of the Convention; (iv) the policy was an attempt to transfer the financial burden of looked-after children away from the council and was an abuse of the council’s dominant position in relation to foster parents and children; and (v) the policy excluded any flexibility to allow payment of the normal fostering allowances to relative foster carers in appropriate cases.
HELD: (1) Section 23(2)(a) of the Act left the framework for providing for fostering allowances to the council’s discretion. That discretion had to be: (a) formulated and implemented to allow flexibility according to the needs of the individual children concerned; (b) exercised in light of the aim of the statutory framework without reliance on irrelevant considerations, without disregarding relevant principles, without being perverse and without conflicting with any duties within the framework; and (c) formulated and exercised to safeguard adequately the right to respect for family life in Art.8 of the Convention and to avoid discrimination in breach of Art.14 of the Convention. (2) The applicants’ submissions that imputed less than worthy motives to the council were not accepted. (3) The council’s policy was driven by the principle that it was undesirable to create a financial dependency on it if that would disincline a friend or relative to apply for a s.8 residence order. That was an entirely legitimate consideration and was entirely in accordance with the key principle in s.26(3) of the Act, namely that all appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that children were placed with their families as far as possible. (4) The council’s policy was unlawful for four reasons: (i) it imposed an arbitrary and inflexible cash limit on the amounts that could be paid to relative foster carers; (ii) it fixed the level of payments to relative foster carers at such a low level that there was an inevitable a conflict with the welfare principle and the council’s statutory duty; (iii) it was Wednesbury unreasonable; and (iv) it fundamentally discriminated against short-term relative foster carers and the children in their care. None of those objections were met by the legitimacy of the council’s objective. (5) The council’s obligation under both the Act and the Convention was to take all appropriate positive steps to ensure that children should live with their families. Differential treatment based on family relationships or which had an additional impact on family members could only be justified by counterbalancing factors of a compelling nature. If the council’s policy failed when tested against classic public law principles, it inevitably followed that it would fail to pass muster under the Convention. In any event, the policy failed to meet the key Convention tests of necessity and proportionality, thereby breaching Arts.8 and 14 of the Convention.
Roger McCarthy QC instructed by Green & Co for the applicants. Ernest Ryder QC and Yvonne Coppel instructed by and for the council.
LTL 26/10/2001 : (2002) 1 FLR 43 : (2002) ACD 284 : Times, December 10, 2001
Judgment: Approved subject to editorial corrections - 39 pages
Document No.: AC0101975
Reference link Solicitors link Full Judgement link
HE WHO CARES, SHOULD WIN, and eventually will! There's a saying in spain, "poco en poco", little by little.
Home is where the heart is and in 2011 this is our home
Thro all the family trauma a new addtion, JACK meets great grandma on 031010. The family get together at a pub for the afternoon was nothing short of a very tense situation.
My sister Angela wants to force her mother back to the UK to live at her house against her mothers consent and after failing to gain her consent and some very derrogatory exchange of texts published here, the following statements were made by the Angela CLAN.
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister Angela and my brother Kevin
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's husband David Platt
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Danielle Jones
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah Jones
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah's, boyfriend Paul Collins
Received 150910 Read A statement made by my brother's wife Tracey Clarke
In defence of the above I and others made the following statements:-
Response 091010 Read A statement made by Michael 6 pages
Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend Cheryl Cavanagh 5 pages
Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend of 35 years Stephen Power
Response 031010 Read A statement made by ex partner of 6 years Paul Moorby
Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years David Owen-Scott
Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Jonathon Goulding
Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Brenda Swain
Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Margaret Davies 3 pages
Out in golfers company for lunch mum wanted to sample some of what the golfers get up to.
Another brick in the wall
NOV 22 2013 FACEBOOK SELECTION
Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful.
The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation.
The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year 2011, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts.
In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes.
Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers.
The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England.
This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.
Like · · Share · Unfollow Post · 19 November at 14:15
Seen by 8
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh, Peter Hofschröer and 2 others like this.
Tatiana Ladislas von Montegatz Michael Clarke could you please explain if this information could be referred to the Court of Protection and be used?
20 November at 03:58 via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke yes IT can but in practice the courts have an habit of ignoring you as in my case
20 November at 08:18 · Like
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh fraud courts, corrupt system. Corrupt Queen who really don't care about us. More interested in donating money abroad but will watch her own people, elderly, disabled abused in this way and do nothing.
59 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 2
Michael Clarke Absolute agreement on that
57 minutes ago · Like
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh It's about time we had no Queen if she cannot do anything for her country or her people. What is she there for? For us to fund and pay her bills!
56 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke EXACTLY it is... SHE IS a waste of time and money
55 minutes ago · Like
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh So are MPs! what have they done for us victims? We are their constituents! They don't care about us! Waste of our money too!
52 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Also police what they are there for if they can't arrest criminals and can't deal with our cases. We do not need them if the corrupt pay them to not investigate, same with IPCC, Law Society, SRA, Ombudsmen, all waste of taxpeyers money. None do their jobs. A disgraceful country this is!
50 minutes ago via mobile · Like · 1
Michael Clarke MY MP GORDON MARSDEN is a complete waste of space the number of run in s I ve had with him and that was just to get an appointment... he has done nothing he I believe is scared of the corrupt lot and prefers to sweep it under the carpet....
47 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly same as me with my MP Robert Halfon. The abuse I had from his secretary just to get an appointment. First he was dealing with the case, then went silent, then wouldn't talk to me and I had abuse. He even ran to John Hemming MP to make false stories about me. Even sweep it under the carpet like they all do or more likely bribed by the corrupt!
40 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Whilst MPs are getting second homes, our homes and goods are being stolen. They don't care about us!
38 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke bribed by the corrupt! NOW THAT RINGS TRUE to me in every sense.... as time has gone on and on the more and more corrupt the entire state is uncovered... I've got to the stage where I NOW BELIEVE THERE IS NO JUSTICE ON OFFER.
38 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke there is only the OPTION OF REVOLUTION...
37 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke SO I PERSONALLY have joined the anti government protesting and rallies groups associated with bringing down the state as the only option to us... these bastards need to pay the ultimate price for their GREED.
35 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh All victims are having the same problems with their MPs, not just you and me. They do nothing for any of us! How many more victims do we need for them to ever do anything?!! Therefore if our MPs can't do anything for you and me and other of their constituents. What are they there for?
34 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke THEY NEEDING EVICTING OUT OF PARLIAMNET AND THEN OUT OF THEIR OWN HOMES
32 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke THAT IS WHY I USED THE COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST OUR SOLICITORS PANNONES AND HUGH JONES... if it were not worth the paper its written on then why did they spend £70,000 on corrupt bent courts and bent barristers and bent judges to try and stop me with false harassment charges to gain fraudulent injunctions???
30 minutes ago · Like · 1
Michael Clarke The judicial system is out of CONTROL just like the identical GOVERNMENT with its BENT banking system built to rob and steal from the poor SLAVES... US! We got to put a stop to it all for the sake of CHILDREN.
27 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly
my suffering has paid for corrupt solicitors Amber Melville-Brown,
Hugh Tomlinson QC, Lorna Skinner's lovely homes and many more corrupt
6 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1
Michael Clarke SOMETIME's you have got to fight fire with FIRE so in other words if they condone robbery, theft fraud and violence in the form of coercion to corrupt courts with forced prison, then it is only right fair and equal that this should be matched by equal forces i.e., VIOLENCE!
9 minutes ago · Like · 1
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Agreed it's about time we took corrupt solicitors, judges and police homes and stole all their goods and see if nothing happens to us like them and for Law Society, SRA to see nothing is wrong & concluded at looking at all victims evidence 'they cannot see anything wrong, case closed, file closed on this matter'
3 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1
NOV 22 2013
FOR THE ATTENTION OF RICHARD ALDERMAN IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
22 November 2013 at 16:12
Dear Mr. Alderman: The email exchange below is self-explanatory. If you were not aware of ACPO's Memorandum of Understanding with the Law Society, I shall be pleased to provide you with a copy of it. You may find it interesting to follow the internet links provided in the correspondence below. I can also provide you with information on fraud and corruption which has never been investigated by police. One reason for this (besides the agreement with the Law Society) is that, in some cases, police are party to racketeering or cover-ups, and another reason may be that police authorities are not staffed with personnel trained to a high enough standard in forensic accounting to be able to do the job of investigating white collar crime. For example, Greater Manchester Police - the second largest force in the UK - only has one officer trained and experienced enough to investigate white collar fraud. Obviously, serious organized crime affects all UN nations, and the UK is party to a legally binding UN convention to fight corruption. However, perhaps for the above reasons, this is not being done sufficiently, and therefore warrants serious and immediate attention. From what I have experienced, alleged responsiblity for crime, policing and justice in the UK seems to be spread across many ministries and ministers, and also be divided up among police, including ACPO, Sir Paul Stephenson, the Special Crime Unit, and various police authorities. When approached with the very serious matter of organized white collar crime, all parties refuse to investigate or intervene. Most just ignore the public and do not respond at all. I am wondering if the Serious Fraud Office, like the government itself, is dictated to by ACPO, and if it will therefore also refuse to investigate white collar crime and corruption? Referring a complainant back to their own police authority does not work because these authorities have already refused to log complaints of fraud, which is why complainants have attempted to escalate the matters - to no avail. There is absolutely nowhere that a person can go to get police to act. It is not possible to escalate the problem because there is absolutely no accountability by anyone in government. I am aware that an arrest of six solicitors was made recently, but there are many more involved in crimes such as fraudulent land title transfer, insurance fraud, and racketeering through the Court of Protection, and the Office of the Public Guardian, among other things. It is unfortunate that you are answerable to The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve, as he has never responded to these concerns at all. I wonder why the government is organized in such a way. Perhaps it is to spread the responsiblity so widely that nobody can be held accountable. This would seem to me to be the reason for it. The Rt. Hon. Nick Herbert talks about establishing a new Economic Crime Agency, but his department has written to say they will not intervene in individual cases, when they have already been advised of crime and corruption among police, and that nobody will investigate. Nobody can escalate a complaint to anyone as everything goes down a dead end street. There is absolutely no accountability by any public authority in the UK. At least, perhaps with Police Commissioners, someone will exert some authority over police and make them accountable to government and the people. There is a brick wall at every ministry and agency door in the UK, which is why there is now pressure on Europe to intervene. It would seem, from the press, that Europol will be involving themselves in British policing. It is unfortunate, but the country has brought it on itself by not adhering to the UN convention. Her Majesty's government is fragmented and not one person, with the exception of a handful of MPs and Lords shows any concern, or takes any action against the corruption that exists and is fostered among legal professionals, police, and the judiciary.. All are in denial. The Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke has been invited to ask for evidence of judicial corruption, and he does not. I wonder why. I don't know what the purpose of the British Prime Minister is. He should be taking the lead, instead of hobnobbing with media monopoly players. Nobody has any accountability to anyone. No doubt it won't be long before the British join Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Yemen, and the rest, and take to the streets. The British have become a seriously oppressed nation because of all the do-nothings in government. It is no wonder that the government has been buying riot gear for the military. Perhaps they are expecting the Storming of the Bastille. I look forward to receiving your comments, and your request for information on the crimes and corruption. Yours sincerely, Bernard Jenkin, MP Public Administration Committee Westminster, UK Dear Mr Jenkin As you can see from the information following this email, I have been alerting authorities since at least 2011 about the police's fraudulent crime figures. Heaven knows how long others have been alerting them. You will also find reference to police fudging figures in two new books by ex police officer, Stephen Hayes: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fifty-Shades-Black-Blue-revelations-ebook/dp/B00G8OB XD0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385045105&sr=8-1&keywords=fifty+shades+of+black+ %27n+blue Jil Matheson is the National Statistician. I believe she has been concerned since I advised her, but nothing has been done by government, with the exception of your own efforts, despite the matter being mentioned in parliament, and despite there also being several newspaper articles about police dereliction of duty since 2011, indicating that police only selectively investigate reported crimes, and most often refuse to record them and issue a crime log number. The financial bonus culture for any public servant makes Britain a laughing stock, but it is worse, when we think that it takes place within police. ACPO is behind all of this nonsense, and is a self-serving old boys' club that should be disbanded. Why on earth would the government not broaden the scope of HM Inspector of Constabularies? Wouldn't that be the most logical move? Obviously, something smells rotten. You should be aware of the fact that many MPs, including those on select committees, are deleting emails from the public, which are respectful and contain intelligence, WITHOUT READING THEM. They are doing it to many, many people, and Ministers are doing it too. It is every bit as serious a corruption problem as police ignoring reports of crime. I know of two people who have tried to report MURDERS and are being ignored by West Yorkshire Police - one of the worst police forces in the country for alleged corruption. They have approached oversight bodies and central government, and are similarly ignored. They have been fighting for justice in the matter for many years. May I emphasise that there are thousands of Britons who have been fighting for justice and police investigations into serious crimes, most notably sophisticated white collar, and yet both police and government ministers ignore them. We have reached the conclusion that police and government are part of the organised crime ring. What other conclusion would a person draw? Something is seriously wrong and, if Mr. Maude is concerned about public servants giving service, he should first examine who is blocking and deleting emails throughout government and public service, and under whose authority they are doing so. The problem of MPs and ministers deleting emails without reading them has been reported to select committees but, unfortunately, several select committee members, including Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge, are culprits themselves. The Public Accounts committee has acknowledged the concern but has no intention of doing anything about it, despite the fact that the culprits obviously do not represent good value for money for the British taxpayer. Perhaps we should have drawn this matter to your attention? Actually, I think some of us may have. The situation involving officials ignoring intelligence (particularly about organised crime) from the public is so bad that concerned citizens now broadcast this matter widely to officials in Europe and beyond, because it is corruption, and this corruption belies the fact that the UK is signatory to international conventions against transnational serious organised crime and against corruption. We feel that many MPs and ministers are fraudulently holding office, when they simply either block emails from the public or delete them without reading them, besides which they do nothing about the problems, even after reading the emails. Mr. Cameron and Mr. Clegg obviously couldn't care less, and it will be their undoing. Theresa May is even worse. The people have had enough. Britain is the weak link in international crime fighting. As you know, police had received information from Toronto Police eighteen months ago regarding Operation Spade, and did nothing with it. No arrests were made in the UK. Britain let the team down, as usual. Britain does not deserve to be a G20 or G8 member, and Kenneth Clarke is surely only jokingly be called the "Anti-Corruption Champion", as we have not seen any action from him ever. In fact, he has been part of the problem. As you can see, police also have an agreement NOT TO INVESTIGATE lawyers. It is shocking that this Memorandum of Agreement could ever have been set up. Please keep up the good work. It looks like you are the only one in the UK with any intelligence to realise how police are supporting serious transnational organised crime by their failure to record and investigate reports. I should also point out that many victims have presented their cases in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and yet nobody has taken any action to help them. This can only be due to institutionalised corruption on a grand scale and, until some action is taken to help these people, then we will continue to believe this. Yours sincerely, ATTENTION: MS. JIL MATHESON - REGARDING INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF CRIME STATISTICS Ms. Jil Matheson UK Statistics Authority Statistics House Tredegar Park Newport South Wales NP10 8XG Dear Ms. Matheson: I was interested to read in the newspaper that you will be working with ACPO and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary on an independent review of national crime statistics. You may be interested to know that, as a result of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between ACPO and the Law Society, white collar crimes involving members of the legal profession are never logged or investigated by police. As you can see, the Memorandum of Understanding is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice. National crime statistics, therefore, can never be accurate; they never were, and never will be, unless police start recording incidents. This state of affairs is a national shame. As a result, I understand that Europe is about to step in and do Britain's policing for them. http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/224895/EU-bureaucrats-win-power-to- probe-UK-crime Police have openly refused, and continue to refuse, to investigage fraud, perjury or forgery, if a legal professional is involved, telling the general public that it is a civil matter. If you have a moment to watch this video, you will hear a policeman telling the gentleman that fraud is a civil matter. This is standard practice. Complaints from the public are simply ignored. No action is taken, not even a report. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg Of course, fraud. perjury and forgery are crimes the world over, except if they take place in the UK and involve a legal professional. One must remember that most complex white collar crime involves a legal professional......and yet it goes unreported because police will not log the crimes, much less investigate them. There are currently hundreds, if not thousands, of victims of white collar crime up and down the country, whose cases have never been logged or investigated by police. Personally, I can attest to the fact that Lancashire police have refused me, nine times to date, a log or incident number, so that I may report a crime. The refusal includes a member of the Professional Standards Branch. Not one officer has ever asked me what crime I wish to report. It could be a murder; it could be anything. However, I believe that they are afraid because I have knowledge of corruption in that constabulary, which is why they refuse to take my report. I will gladly supply the details to anyone who might feel it is their duty to act. The Home Office has already said that they don't want to involve themselves, so I can only think that, as Mr. Cameron doesn't show any interest either, nobody in the UK cares. So crimes in the UK are going unreported and uninvestigated; therefore, your statistics will always be flawed. Your review is a complete waste of government money and effort because, as long as ACPO continues to run the country with its corrupt hidden agenda, and its Memorandae of Understanding with whomever it sees fit, reports will be a complete sham. You don't have, and will never have, true statistics. Crimes committed by the police are never logged, and there are many cases of police harrassment and brutality, such as that of South Wales Police continually harrassing Mr. Maurice Kirk, and Lancashire Constabulary continually harrassing Ms. Carol Woods - no log numbers for either issues - just police harrassment in a very serious and ongoing manner, including imprisonment without due process, and attempts to section these individuals under the Mental Health Act. I would be delighted to supply information so that the government might investigate, but it appears that it does not feel it has any authority over ACPO. It seems that ACPO runs the whole country, including the Home Office, which seems to condones everything they do, and which says it has no authority to invervene in any matters whatsoever. I always thought the Prime Minister would have some power if he should choose to use it. Baroness Neville-Jones offers no apology for the attached Memorandum of Understanding, and simply stated, while addressing the House of Commons, that the Memorandum of Understanding was decommissioned in 2007. It most certainly was not, as you can see from the video. What's more, it should never have existed in the first place, as it is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice, and ACPO has been doing so for a long time, and still continue to do so. That, coupled with the outright refusal by police in every single authority to write up incident reports and issue log numbers, is a culpable offence for police officers in most other country except corrupt Britain. It is corruption not to allow people to report crimes. Perhaps this matter should be taken to higher authorities before you waste your time? It seems like someone has already told Europe about it. If I can offer any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me by email or phone. Yours sincerelyDear xxxxxx Thank you for your e-mail to Jil Matheson. I will pass to colleagues working on the review of crime statistics and we will respond properly as soon as we are able. Kind regards Alex Elton-Wall Private Secretary National Statistician's Office UK Statistics Authority Tel: 01633 455306 Mob: 07795 800089 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
FACEBOOK ENTRY 15/12/2013
FRAUDULENT USE OF EU TAXPAYERS' MONEY - AUDIT
15 December 2013 at 13:29
The British public would like you to be aware of the fraudulent manner in which the British civil servants are operating, and to take action. Civil servants are denying Freedom of Information requests to the public, but what is worse is that Ministers and/or their staff simply delete emails from members of the public without reading them.
On several occasions, I have sent information to Francis Maude, Cabinet Minister, about this problem as he purports to be conducting civil service reform. I am far from being the only member of the public to experience it blocking from almost all ministries. The two examples I give today are just two of many from right across all government departments, and also from local governments. My purpose, when writing to Mr. Maude, was to advise him that this is happening in all public departments, as I innocently presumed that he did not know that parliamentary correspondence clerks often simply delete emails without reading them, and many of them contain intelligence to help them do their jobs.
His own private secretary/parliamentary assistant deleted at least some of them without reading them, along with other emails, and yet the very subject of the emails was about civil servants deleting emails! She provided the proof of it below.
As you will see from my email further down the page, civil servants in the UK are not providing service and are, therefore, every bit of a problem as those Palestinian civil servants who were audited by the EU. http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Civil+servants+paid+stay+home+audit/9277305/story.html
Members of the public are denied service, even by select committee members of parliament, who also either delete their emails without reading them, and ALWAYS ignore the information provided.
Here are some comments from other people regarding the matter. I have removed their identifiers:
From: martin brighton Date: 12 December 2013 21:30:35 GMTTo: david pidcock Subject: Re: SOMEONE IS MAKING A FOOL OF FRANCIS MAUDE
The blocking of emails to ministers by civil servants had been going on for years. The practice has several advantages:
a) The civil servants are controlling the flow of information, so control the game
b) The Minister is provided with the excuse of 'plausible deniability' when bad or sabotaged policies inevitably go t***-up
c) The Minister is then 'owned' by the civil servant
d) The civil servant can thus make or break any minister, who would be cut loose and blamed for not knowing what is going on
e) When the civil servant is controlled by a third party to which there is primacy of loyalty, that third party effectively becomes the de facto government - this is the crucial point.
There is such a third party that is riddled throughout the civil service, from Cabinet Office, down through every tier of governance, to local authorities and even street level.
Kerslake (Sir Bob) is inextricably entangled with that organisation, and publicly supports it.
Despite Eric Pickles saying 'No more spending by local authorities', they show him nothing but contempt.
Because Francis Maude and the Prime Minister support this insurrectionist and corrupt organisation, both Maude and Cameron are showing sheer and Utter contempt for Pickles, whilst the organisation (COMMON PURPOSE) shows contempt for them all.
In Sheffield, from 1997 to 2005, the Chief Executive Officer presided over multi-million pound fraud and corruption, whilst pandering to political whims, thus assuring promotion and teflon coating. Of course, even according to government's own records, things got worse, despite the hundreds of millions of money poured in. All the while, every project turned out to be an abysmal failure whilst the crocodile tears from the top whinged about the intransigence of public servants to culture change - exactly the same message we hear today from the Cabinet Civil Servant. And who was that CEO ? None other than Sheffield's former Chief Executive Sir Robert (Bob)
Kerslake (AKA KERSNAKE)
an extremely Uncivil Serpent!And what is this organisation ?
Yes, you guessed it -its Common Purpose
Of course, in terms that would embarrass Orwellian Newspeak, each failure is a sugar-coated triumph.
Of course there will be an Inquiry, but:
The Inquiry will not take place unless and until the outcome is already assured in keeping with the pre-set agenda.
The civil servants will control all the input to the Inquiry.
In Sheffield, the council's tactic to unwanted truths is to simply put an electronic block on the target's emails, then apply the policies of Deny and Lie, coupled with Control or Destroy.
Just like the Cabinet Office today.
Any continuity ?
Meanwhile, via the Cabinet Office civil servants, they refuse to be open, honest and transparent about Common Purpose membership within government, which is directly contrary to Civil Service rules.
Given the real agenda that is being played out by the back-door/back-room boys, Kerslake (KerSnake) is right to say that the Whitehall machine is performing remarkably well - but only if you consider that the Whitehall agenda does not reflect the manifesto of any elected government, but that of the clandestine, insurrectionist, corrupt, kerslake-supported organisation, Common Purpose.
Happy times ahead,
Dear Peter and friends who have suffered likewise from Secret Court abuses,
Thank you for making this point about the inhumane Italian case. Everyone that I have spoken to is shocked but not surprised by the savagery demonstrated by lead Essex Social services/ health partnership professionals. We have been observing and experiencing their brutal ways for years. I'm advised by the local clergy that they have received reports of several other horror services about how badly the social services and NHS health partnerships have behaved over the years. The bad behaviour is usually driven by the individual's search for promotion or money and in the case of the COP (note: COURT OF PROTECTION) and it's associates, power and money.
In our own case we had evidence of when a social services introduced/corrupt solicitor (Ms J. Pleass) instructed a psychiatrist (Dr. S Mann) to sign a COP form in order to obtain control and our family's money. It was done in a carefully timed way, so as to maximise control by social services and the solicitor who were working together with COP et al assistance. (The second corrupt solicitor working alongside the first corrupt solicitor was brother & sister owned Giles Wilson- calling themselves the Official Receiver and then Official Solicitor, in order to maximise their theft from our family under the guise of legitimate decisions carried out by a Secret Court, to whom we were disallowed an appeal)
We have seen that the people who did wrong were promoted up and up the structures as a consequence of their taking risks with us and with other people's lives too. They have been upsetting whole families and the rest of the course of their lives in a routine way for decades. The model of mental terrorism that Essex employs is echoed throughout the UK in those counties that like to follow Essex's model.
The Essex Deputy Social Services officer is also responsible as a leading National UK figure for the General Society for Social Workers organisation.
Unusually, the Non Essex MP John Hemmings seems to have taken the case up. He is one of the few that tries to do the right thing on this issue. There has been silence from Eric Pickles who is the Essex MP who may have been responsible for looking after this particular issue involving the Italian lady and her unborn child.
COP matters seem to be readily sidestepped by many MPs . These types of MP seem determined not to find answers when requests or concerns are raised about COP matters. The SoS minister Lamb was giving evidence in the House of Lords on 3rd Dec 2013 in front of a committee re. the COP, but I felt that many twists were interwoven into the evidence given. The witnesses were often not answering the question. They often seemed incapable of listening to what was being said to them. They sat side by side as they masked the seriousness of what has continued to take place under the Coalition, and Labour before that.
Real evidence shows how poorly the COP has acted. But the real evidence is frequently buried. And even when it is briefly aired, it is soon forgotten by those politicians who choose to ignore it. Few in politics seem concerned about how badly the COP et al continues to perform. Even fewer have admitted that this is organised criminal activity carried out by our own UK secret courts and the personnel who attend.
Lack of transparency pervades more and more of our so called public affairs. Meanwhile, the Secret courts are the root of much on going corruption. And the public are extremely worn down and upset by the lack of response shown when they raise this fact as evidence, again and again. We are tired of the fact that when evidence is called for, and we respond, having only just head about the call, we are suddenly stopped short. The receiving of evidence is suddenly curtailed. And the politicians are protected once more by the civil servants, from feeling the full scale wrath of the public. The public who object to secret courts need to have their complaints fully heard.
Various groups have experienced such poor management and performance by the COP and it's associates who work together most effectively to destroy so many lives.
The Secret court corruption is on such a widescale that we feel that the evidence committee should sit again and receive a further 2 reports from the ministers following the many questions that they failed to answer. And there should be at least two more sessions of evidence taking to hear from the focus group leaders who have experienced the non performance of the COP et al, often at first hand. There should be no attempt to put only the polished representatives before the House. The House of Lords Committee deserves to hear direct from the man & woman on the street who has suffered as a consequence of the COP et al's masked inhumanity and poor performance.
NOTE: The House of Lords Parliamentary Committee on the Mental Capacity Act refused to hear evidence of crime and corruption involving mentally incapacitated or vulnerable persons on the bais that people were named. So they evidence has simply been thrown into the garbage by the very committee that should be protecting these people. Mike Clark and several others received a letter from the Chairman of the Committee, Lord Hardie, after submitting evidence that should be investigated, and having been advised that MPs, police, and ministers have refused to either investigate and/or respond to allegations of very serious fraud taking place within the courts and/or facilitated by the Official Solicitor’s office. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/mental-capacity-act-2005/
This denial of service is mass fraud – they are being paid public monies to do a job that they are simply not doing. Furthermore, these Lords are concealing allegations of criminality instead of investigating them, and they will receive an EU PENSION at the end of their working life.
True to form, they all turn a blind eye when confronted with allegations of official corruption. There is not one person in the UK, including the Prime Minister, willing to address these allegations.
Some of the victims of serious white collar crimes have presented their cases, on several occasions, to Members of the House of Commons, and Members of the House of Lords. Some are recorded on video. There has been no offer of help for them, and the crimes are uninvestigated because British police refuse to record or investigate the allegations, and nobody in government cares.
Will you please be kind enough to read on. At the end of this page, you will see the evidence of Libby Dewdney-Herbert, Mr. Maude’s personal assistant, deleting emails without reading them. It shows a total disdain for the public.
As a result, I wrote the email highlighted in green, using information in the public domain, which highlights the fraudulent use of EU monies by British public servants, ministers and MPs. They are not doing the job that the taxpayers expect them to do, especially when they don’t even read correspondence from concerned citizens about the corruption of both parliament and police.
The items highlighted in yellow show how public servants are deleting emails addressed to ministers without reading them. As you will see, the new National Crime Agency is also deleting emails containing criminal intelligence. It is no wonder that the UK is unable to prosecute criminals operating at a high level of serious organised crime. Evidence may be lost, due to lazy civil servants who simply don’t want to have to deal with correspondence. You will see from some of the newspaper reports that they now do not deal with emails on Thursdays, and many take Fridays off. Many work from home, where there is no supervision.
These are ONLY TWO examples.
Britain is a threat to world security, and something needs to be done about both its abysmally corrupt policing, and its abysmal public servants and parliamentarians who allow them to block information, and who do nothing at all to investigate allegations of serious corruption and cover ups involving criminals with law degrees, judges, lawyers and police.
This may also be of interest to you:
You and 2 others like this.
Yvonne Stewart-Taylor https://www.facebook.com/.../response-to.../637761266286613
RESPONSE TO SOMEONE IS MAKING A FOOL OF FRANCIS MAUDE
“Decision FS50435121 The Cabinet Office carefully interpret a request about cont...See more
by: Yvonne Stewart-Taylor
about an hour ago · Like
Mike Clarke IT IS TIME to start to name them with dates of birth and photos of their properties with addresses as we are doing and to shame them publicly to publish it all.. www.opg.me
Working by ARCHAngel Michael In this section you will find some information about Archangel Michael. Archangel Michael is a prince of the
Angels, prince of light, regent prince of the seraphim, regent prince of the virtues, an angel of deliverance and
a prince of the divine presence. His name is in a form of a rhetorical question, meaning “ who is like God?”.
Archangel Michael is the angel of protection,strength and truth. He gives you courage to face the truth and
overcome any obstacles and fears that you have about your future. He helps us to find increased clarity in
what we think,do and say, and helps us to be more assertive and have more self - belief and self - assurance.
He helps us to work with the theme of personal will, showing and encouraging us to bring our own will into
harmony with Divine will (“Thy will, not mine”). As we become more aware of our personal power and will,
our capacity to be gentle and loving members of humanity increases. When we are fearful, Archangel Michael
comes to dissolve doubt and fear, and gently teaches us how to understand and work with the basic theme of
this world - that of duality and the battle between darkness and light. Archangel Michael is one of the Guardians
of karma, and can help us to work with and clear any karma or karmic entanglements we have with each other. In
his work with us on the First Ray he wants us to develop our own strength and willpower and to both recognise,
accept and integrate our shadow aspects. In our daily and spiritual lives he gives us the strength to stand up and
fight for what is right and light, and to recognise our own truths and stand up for them.
Michael is the Archangel of power, desire and action. He is often pictured carrying a sword which symbolises
the power of love and which may cut us free of all that binds us or holds us prisoner. His sword is surrounded
by a silvery - blue flame, which we interpret as the Magdalenen flame containing the innocent and pure energy of
the love of Divine Source - the flame from the great central sun at the heart of our universe. Blue is also the
colour of his protective cloaking energy, which we may invoke at any time we need protection. Michael’s
primary task is to cleanse Earth’s atmosphere and the auras of all humankind of all lower thought - forms,
dissolving all that is not perfect or of the highest vibrations. He wants to show all sentient beings the path back
To God when they have strayed. Archangel Michael has also taken on the role of Protector and Guardian of mankind,
and he is relentless in his protection and defence of those who wish to live in the light. He is committed to help all
souls who call on him and will always assist in whatever action is necessary to bring about justice and resolution.
Another symbol representative of his energies is a scale of balance, representing Justice. He also carries the gold
Ray of Source, which may sometimes be seen blazing from his solar plexus, or surrounding him.
INFORMATION ABOUT ARCHANGEL MICHAEL
Name meaning “He who is as God”
Virtues Health, Organization, Power
Colour of Aura Blue, Gold
Guards this day Wednesday, Sunday
Ray Works with the First Ray of Divine will, Power and Protection
Relevant Chakra 5th ( Throat) and 3rd ( Solar Plexus)
Related to number 6
Related to Crystals blue crystals: sapphire, blue topaz: for peacefulness, and healing
Yellow / gold crystals: yellow topaz, citrine: to initiate positive action,
Improve communications. Other crystals are Ruby, Tigers Eye, Amber, Turquoise
and Lapis, Chrysolite
Aromatherapy oils Myrrh, Eucalyptus and Lemon
Herbs Chamomile, Rosemary, St John’s Wort, Mistletoe, Melissa, Eyebright
Incense Frankinscense, myrrh, Copal, Cinnamon, Bergamot
Colour Gold, Yellow
Symbols Sword, Blue Cloak, Sun, Gold, Metal Colour, Scale of balance
The Function of Archangel Michael
Archangel Michael is the guardian of the house of spirit and dreams, and is the archangel working for cooperation and
reconciliation. Now is the time for us to learn to live in peace and harmony with others, to break down the barriers that
have separated nations, political parties, religious sects, families, and individuals due to differences of opinion, fear. All
of us are citizens of Earth, regardless of our diversity. In the movement toward this level of cooperation, Michael is the
being to invoke.
When to ask Archangel Michael for help
You may want to invoke Archangel Michael when
• you are faced with changes that you are uncertain about
• have a person or situation you are having difficulty confronting
• need help with clarity of communication
• when you need physical strength
• when you wish to cut ties that bind you to a thing, person or situation
• when you need spiritual protection
How to Invoke Archangel Michael
Michael protect me
The sword of Michael and his truth protects me
His cloak of blue covers me
Michael give me the strength as I courageously face this situation
Michael cut away all falseness with your sword so that I may be myself
I courageously claim my power
The energies of the Angels and the Stars strengthen me
Righteousness, truth and love is my path
Visualize the sword as metal or a living flame helping you to cut away fear
Archangel Michael is the warrior Archangel associated with Life Mission and Divine Purpose.
We are currently in a time known as 'The Age Of Michael', so-called because Michael is working with SO many people right now.
This powerful and mighty Angel comes through frequently in my Consultations because it is vital that we all stand up and claim our Divine Right Purpose; the work we came here to do.
It is also imperative that we have the courage to let go of situations and patterns that are blocking this. Michael lends his Sword Of Truth and Light to cut away all that does not serve us.
Archangel Michael is working consistently from the Upper Realms this year to guide you onto your Highest Path; that which will most highly serve yourself and the entire planet, and will bring you the deepest fulfillment, joy and love.
If you have not yet consciously connected with this magnificent warrior-like Archangel, perhaps this message is a clear sign from him that you take steps to do so!
Even if you regularly make contact with him in your own way, today Michael has a specific message, which I have channeled for you. Just reading the words given from High Beings such as Michael creates changes in your personal vibration, and will open your Heart to accept more Love into your life.
"Dear All Bringers Of the Light upon the Earth,
I am deeply honoured to make my connections with you at this critical time in your beloved planet's evolution.
Many of you are familiar with my vibration and words - having sought me out in times of intense change and doubt, many fears for your future purpose being the first thing on your mind when you call upon me.
What is important to know is that any time you activate my Light within your Soul, simply by calling me in, the profound vibrational shifts and micro-cellular activity within your energy field is begun. This spiritual medicine works upon your whole being; physical, mental, emotional and within the Chakra energy system.
Without conscious awareness, you are then strongly guided to make life choices and changes that you may have been avoiding through misguided fear. Everything I guide and direct you to do is through my all-encompassing Love for you and your contribution to peace in the Universe.
Now is the time when I make myself known to you with a renewed vigour!
For a new time has commenced - this I must impress upon you now. A new time wherein all Souls who have elected to be the harbingers of real, positive and electrifying change are called up for active service to the Divine.
This means YOU, Dear Child of Holiness.
Believe my words as I speak, that I am directing you with haste and speed towards a life that is your truest and most Heavenly function. If life seems to speed up a little forthwith, make no mistakes in your thinking - it is MY work!
I am swelled with Love and pride for you, my Blessed children of Light,
Lord and Messenger of Truth, Honour and Holy Purpose."
Not Overtaken, Reborn ANNA VON RIETZ 27.03.2017
I haven't had an opportunity to review this lengthy psyops report in depth, but it appears to be based on the assumption that because the names have changed and some international forces and new weapons are present, the America we love and know is being lost and overtaken. In fact, what is being stripped away are the false names and presumptions that were the result of the Great Fraud and illegal occupation beginning in 1861.
The actual country that we living American people are owed is being returned and the States of America are receiving back all the assets and credit that has been embezzled. Remember that the original constitution is called "The Constitution for the united States of America"----- the name of this country as it pertains to the delegated authority in international jurisdiction was always "States of America". The "united" was an adjective used to describe "States of America".
This whole situation has become overly complex over time and the lawyers have had a field day confusing everyone and making false claims and practicing personage and barratry. They've had a really sweet racketeering operation on our shores and they've done it in such a clever way that at the end of the day, they can even attempt to blame it on us and say that they did it all in our best interests.
I am blowing past all that, as if it doesn't exist, and going to the meat of the matter. We want our land, we want our homes, we want our money, we want our identities, our copyrights, our trademarks, our patents--- all of it returned. We want clean, clear, easy means to correct our political status, obtain proper passports, and convert all these "public trusts" back into private bank accounts. We want remedy on the land, full cure and maintenance on the sea, and redemption in the jurisdiction of the air.
To do that requires going back to the actual names of things as they were 150 years ago and doing justice to the dead. Think of all the people who lived and died as slaves since 1861, thinking that they were free men? Deluded, fooled, defrauded, embezzled, conned by these criminals?
It's not just a matter of what is due to us, it's what was due to our great-great-grandparents, too.
There was a plan to kill the Priority Creditors of the con artists, just as they did in Nazi Germany. We blew that to smithereens in 2014. There was a plan to declare our Republics "dead", no longer having "international representation" and no longer having a sufficient currency in international circulation. We blew that sky-high in 2015. At every turn, as the con artists have tried to undermine us, tried to deny our claims, tried to gain the legal edge---- they have been defeated.
And not just defeated. Squashed flat. Exposed. Like roaches.
There was an attempt by HRM Elizabeth II to claim that she was the Head of State of the United States of America. Wrong. The actual Head of State stepped forward. There was an attempt by FRANCE, that is, Jacob Rothschild, to establish a contract by assumption and succession. We said, thanks, but no thanks. In public. Repeatedly.
What needs to happen in America and in every other country around the world is a full and honest housecleaning and education of the public so as to enable every man and woman to make decisions---- a sort of planetary Townhall meeting --- where each one except those who really, truly are disabled and unable to act in their own behalf --- gets to exercise their free will and have access to their own credit without middlemen.
Anyone who is not in a coma, anyone who is say, sixteen or older, anyone who is mentally competent --- should be truthfully told about the issues and choices, and then allowed to choose for themselves.
Those who are with me believe that when a man or woman is given all the facts, all the pros and cons, the vast majority will choose what is right and good for themselves and for their country and for all mankind. Take away the lies and fears and tell the truth and at the end of the day---- we are grown up enough and rational enough to choose what is good.
I have often told the story of being lost in a blizzard in the back country of Alaska and seeing a tiny little Quonset hut in the distance, struggling my way to the door, and being welcomed by a very elderly Eskimo living very simple life on the very edge of nowhere. When it comes push to shove, when we become aware of how small we are, when we start discerning the real miracles of life--- then all of a sudden the world drops away and what is real and precious becomes painfully apparent.
Nobody has to tell us what is true or what is good. We all already know.
It's right there in front of us. It's been there all the time. And when we remember who and what we are, it's so easy to be grateful and to choose life and to share, because we finally realize that we are worthy and we are loved and we are blessed and we are immersed in riches beyond compare in great abundance, with more than enough for our needs and wants and wishes, more than enough for every man to have his home in peace.
The dark night of the Doctrine of Scarcity and the rule of Satan is finally ending. The Thousand Years of Peace has been declared, and those who are guilty are scattering and stumbling, afraid of what this means and what will be done to them. It is the Will of our Father, that not one will be lost. Not a single goat, not a single sheep. All will be redeemed. All will be cared for. All will be taught. All will be cherished. And though their sins are as scarlet, they shall be washed white as wool.
Those who are ruining the Earth will be stopped and a new Paradise will be born and it is happening right now.
The plans of the Enemy are all torn and run amok. The power of money is nothing compared to the power of Nature and love. Rejoice. Have faith. You may feel angry about what has been revealed. You may be afraid. Other people may be rushing around in a panic. Some may try to delude you again. There's ten pounds of ignorance for every pound of knowledge on the street right now. But what I am telling you is true, and what all the naysayers and fear-mongers are telling you, is not.
And as we should all know by now, when what is true comes, what is false must pass away.
A claim made under common law, a claim made under GOD, a claim that GOD is my witness to the truth!! A claim made without any rebuttal!
Read the debt
& read LIENS RECOGNISED BY PANNONES & where it is clear that PANNONE s partner Richard Drinkwater, whom is one of our endebted partners within our own Commercial Lien above, against themselves at PANNONE s and his recognition of holders of liens where creditors such as us, "are authentic", where PANNONE s have openly claimed no recognition of "our commercial lien" against them or the Commercial Affidavit Process claiming its of no value. Can one clearly see the contradictions that are riddled in the company Pannone s, that is so called award winning, are the awards for contradiction. see the picture! Isn't it funny the minute a commercial lien is served upon them that they do not recognise it, so why did they fraudulently use harassement laws to try to curtail it! Probably spending, according to them in excess of £50,000. Was this action in effect recognition, of a perfected commercial lien? Seeing as this is turning out to be a trial by internet we will let you the public be the judge of this!
Appointed by judge DENZIL LUSH, against the direct wishes of the patient, Hugh Jones of PANNONE & Co solicitors Manchester took his position in charge of mums damages awarded to pay for care in 2001 the sum of £775,000, as her deputy/receiver. It has to be said and noted that his first years charges, expected to be £2500 as laid down by judge Denzil LUSH, actually came out at £26,371.77p! Take note that in his first year of office whilst he gave me and my mother £200 per week to live off he deducted from the damages £507 per week charges just to say NO! every time his phone rang.
The problems, having been astronomic to the point of writing a book, started from day 1 with the words from Mr Hugh Jones's "broad brush approach" that suddenly turned very narrow! Since that first year of 2001 he has refused to supply any details of the subsequent 9 years of charges that remain a secret to this day ON 311011. If it was your relative would you consider this theft!
Judge Denzil Lush
Whom in our opinion, has no idea of the family decimation that he is causing or if he does he is certainly turning a blind eye to the reality of the lies, ignorance, discrimination, corruption, theft, absolute breaches in human rights and the complete lack of equality that is the cornerstone of THE COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Our Labour MP representative for Blackpool South area, Mr Gordon Marsden. upon writing my concerns to him in November 09 it took him 3 months to send an unsatisfactory reply. I then wrote to the party office. On the 29th November 2010 I wrote to Gordon Marsden but to date no reply! Today 14.01.2011 I wrote to his party office complaining and sent a copy of the email back to Gordon of the 29th Nov 2010.
OPG- Chief - Alan Eccles
To Martin John Ex: Chief Executive of the OPG. Five statutory principles that underpin the MCA 2005:
• it should be assumed that everyone over 16 has the capacity to make their own decision, unless it can be shown they lack capacity
• a patient should not be regarded as unable to make a decision until all practicable steps to help them make it have been taken, without success
• a person should not viewed as someone lacking the capacity to make a decision, simply because the decision is unwise
• practitioners must ensure that any act done or decision made on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be in their best interests
• any decision made must also be the least restrictive of their basic rights and freedoms.
SO AM I A NUTTER & WHAT IS A SOVEREIGN?
So, what is lawful rebellion? (or being a freemen on the land)
I’ll try to give a little basic background to it.
(Please note it’s not comprehensive it’s just a rough guide)
In the year 1215 the first of our constitutional rights were set down on paper, it was called the Magna Carta, this was basically an oath from the crown (King or Queen) to uphold the rights of the people set down in it and to look after the peoples best interests, in return for the crowns promise to the people they agreed to be ruled by the crown, so it was a contract between crown and people basically, and it became the law.
The crown had to uphold the rights and common law as did the people, not to cause death, harm, or loss to another, or be fraudulent in your contracts (in other words be honest and true).
In 1689 the bill of rights was set down on paper, this basically sealed all the rights given in the Magna Carta plus a few more, both documents contain our UK common law written down and formed our law.
These two documents are the main fundamental parts of our UK constitution, yes we do actually have one, many claim that the UK has no written constitution, this is not true. We have the most respected constitution in the world, it is the basis of the constitutions of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India.
Rather than being one written document we have several that make up the UK constitution, the primary of which is the Magna Carta and the 1689 bill of rights. (the freeman movement in Canada seems to be gaining respect from some Canadian policemen) Part of both the Magna Carta and the 1689 bill of rights states that they cannot be repealed because they are such well-made laws and rights!
“”Lord Justice Laws on 18th February 2002: "The special status of constitutional statutes follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689…Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not…." “
Now our ancestors were not daft, they knew there could be a problem one day if the crown became unjust, or turned into some sort of dictatorship, or parliament was acting against the people, or was full of corruption, or was not allowing the crown to keep its oath.
So in article 61 of the Magna Carta it was written that if this ever happened you could petition the crown to sort out the crowns problem (or parliaments if it was them), the crown had 40 days to fix it or dissolve parliament.
If in the 40 days nothing was fixed the petitioner could go into rebellion against the crown and parliament lawfully until the problem was resolved.
Because this was lawful and the petitioner had a right to do it he would go into “lawful rebellion”, he would no longer have allegiance to the crown or parliament because they had become corrupt etc, he would be a hindrance and a rebel, and fight to end the corruption or injustice within the system, it was law that he could do this, and he was actually obeying the law by doing it, because it is the peoples duty to fight corruption and uphold the law.
So that’s the basics of it.
Because our constitution cannot be repealed it is still valid law.
Now, to do this today you first send an affidavit (a sworn oath of truth, the most powerful lawful and legal document you can get) to our Queen, stating that the crown or in this case our government acting for the crown and its MPs are breaking the constitutional contract (and they really are breaking it), and ask for it to be fixed within 40 days, this is witnessed and counter signed and sealed by a credible witness (I used a solicitor).
I did not make my oath lightly, I took an oath to defend the crown when I joined the army, I was now withdrawing my oath of allegiance, it may sound strange to some but I had a lump in my throat doing it, it was made in good faith.
It is then sent to the queen, then if in 40 days the problem is not fixed a second affidavit is then sent to the Queen, this time saying that the problem is not fixed and therefore the crown or government acting for the crown has broken the contract with the people, and you are therefore no longer going to obey or be ruled by a corrupt crown or government, you are now in lawful rebellion.
Now contrary to what any government officials may tell you this is lawful, and it is a binding oath sworn before God (and the witness), it is my right, your right, everyone’s right to do this, but only if there is a genuine breach of the contract.
The powers that be want you to believe that we have no constitution and anything we do have has been repealed, or 90% of it anyway, it’s in their interests to have you believe this so they can get away with anything they want without the people stopping them.
As you can see from the statement by Lord Justice Laws it is our constitution and cannot just be scrapped by parliament or our self-serving MPs and politicians, it is still valid law no matter what our politicians say, they have never ever had the right to repeal any of it.
Some of the breaches we are using for entering lawful rebellion are, corruption in parliament and our government, we all know this is happening, It’s not just one party its them all.
Our past and present government has allowed and is allowing foreign powers (the EU) to rule over us. The European Union, this is a hugely corrupt system and its not working in anyone’s best interests except the EU politicians and their powerful business associates, the EU is a dictatorship, run by un elected leaders, look into it and you will see this is true.
When our government handed over our sovereignty to the EU they committed treason!
This is 100% true, they really have committed treason, take a look at the Ukip website for some very interesting facts and figures etc., it is beyond belief what the EU gets up to (I’m just using Ukip as they have collected a lot of info, not because they are the exception to any other party).
The EU is our peoples greatest enemy, second to that is our own government and most of the mainstream parties, I know that the police are supposed to be non-political but you all have freedom of thought and I am sure you must realise what a corrupt bunch of leaders we have (done worry I’m not looking for comments on this! lol)
When our government does something wrong they just pretend they haven’t done it, if it gets to hot a subject they stick a gagging order on it (D notice I think is the correct term?).
Lawful and Legal? What's the difference?
There’s lots of talk on the freeman sites (and other sites) about being Lawful and legal and the difference between the two, but there’s not much in the way of a basic guide so it ends up confusing, some will know the difference but for those who don’t here we go. Basically anything in our constitution including common law is lawful (true law).
Any acts that parliament have passed are legal, these will be in the form of acts or statute laws, these “legal” acts should not contradict common law or what’s in our constitution, some of them do but we won’t go into that.
We had a system in place that could not be changed (common law and our constitution), so if parliament wanted to pass new legal acts etc. it had to find a way of doing it and making it enforceable. The Royal navy already used a legal system called Admiral law to keep its sailors in check and make sure its members obeyed officers and the navy rules, all navy members had to swear an oath to obey it etc. it became a legal contract and so it was enforceable. It was only used on ships and within the navy but it worked and was ready made so parliament adopted it (or a version of it), now parliament had a system to use to make new “legal” laws.
For it to work people had to think it was lawful, we did not know any different so we just took it as being right and obeyed, but none of us have ever sworn an oath to parliament or the crown to be in the navy and obey admiralty law (unless you have been in the navy I guess), so there is no binding contract between legal acts or statutes and the people, we have been getting duped into obeying them.
A statute law or act is in legal terms is defined as “ an act given the force of law by the consent of the governed”, note it says consent, so if you don’t consent to it and there is no contract between yourself and the other party it is not law.
So now you see why freemen (and those claiming to be freemen) will say I do not consent, and there is no contract between us, I have broken no law when you are going to arrest them or make them obey an act or statute legislation.
I have served my lawful affidavits to the crown and I am not in the Navy or under admiralty law, so I am a freeman on the land.
When the queen made her coronation oath it was to uphold the people’s rights and common law and do her duty for our country and its people.
When you made your oaths to the queen it was to her so she could uphold her oaths and the law.
When I swore my oath I did it lawfully and honourably in good faith, and for the right reasons, so please don’t write us all off as nutters, I urge you all to please give us the benefit of the doubt when dealing with freemen.
If the person you are dealing with has filed their affidavits and is genuinely in lawful rebellion under article 61 of the Magna Carta (they should be able to show you proof), I urge you to please follow common law when dealing with them, they are truly under the jurisdiction of common law only, not acts of parliament or statue law.
By trying to hold a genuine freeman on anything other than a breach of common law you would truly be breaking common law yourself, and your oaths were to uphold our queen and common law.
I genuinely hope this has given you a little better understanding of what we are doing and why.
Thanks go to Rebel Leader http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk
for allowing me to use this article to explain what a freeman/woman on the land is.
A court of equity is a court which can apply equitable remedies to disputes. Courts of equity operate within the legal system, but rather than focusing on the application of law, they look at cases and determine outcomes based on fairness. Also known as chancery courts, courts of equity can be found in many regions of the world. In some areas, they operate entirely separately from courts of law, and in others, a court of law is empowered to handle both legal and equitable remedies.
The concept of a chancery court arose in England when citizens began to express dissatisfaction with legal judgments handed down by the courts. They argued that the law was sometimes unfair, and that some situations were not covered by the law, making it impossible for the courts to respond. Courts of equity arose to handle legal situations in which people might want damages beyond monetary damages, with the judge empowered to act on discretion, rather than following the rule of the law.
A court of equity still has some legal responsibilities, but it has more leeway when it comes to judging cases. It can hand down a judgment which includes an equitable remedy such as an injunction, as opposed to simple monetary damages. Courts of equity can be used for things like specific performance, for example, in which someone is asked to make good on a breach of contract.
Notice to the High Court:
Delivered by hand – at the Manchester Justice Centre:
14th January 2013. CASE 2MA90015
Notice is given to ‘the court’ of the following: -
In the matter of MICHAEL CLARKE (legal fiction).
· Challenge of jurisdiction:
· Challenge of the legitimacy of the judge:
· The Queen is no longer sovereign:
· All prior orders are void:
· There is no case to answer:
This notice is delivered in writing prior to the commencement of any hearing in recognition of the fact that in the past when reasonable approach has been made to ‘the court’ to deal with the issues presented below… the court has adopted a position of abandonment – and has resorted to secret hearings to declare judgment in an effort to retain its authority… we can no longer tolerate avoidance of the facts and we thus challenge the court to address these issue or be condemned by its own acquiescence through silence.
No court can make judgment in its own cause… it is anathema to justice. We claim that the High Court has no legitimacy… because it fails to uphold the rule-of-law and has resorted instead to the rule-of-force (coercion) to impose its claimed authority.
Legitimate authority derives from consent not coercion.
The court must address the issues raised or the authority of the court evaporates. The issues are not going to go away and more and more people will challenge the court until addressed.
Challenging the authority of government and the legitimacy of the judiciary is a democratic right where questions of propriety arise
Challenge to Jurisdiction:
In the matter of MICHAEL CLARKE (legal fiction):
MICHAEL CLARKE is a legal fiction - summonsed by High Court order to ‘appear’ today and is presented to the court as ordered – in recognition of the authority of the court and its jurisdiction over the legal fiction The legal fiction appears by way of a copy of the birth certificate… as the ‘original’ certificate is not available.
MICHALE CLARKE as referred to in the High court document is not a living sentient being… i.e. a man – this is self-evident - as no man is subject to the authority of any other without his consent - we are all born equal. This is not a romantic notion it is a statement of cold hard fact.
Neither the denial or bluster of the legal profession in any capacity will suppress the authority of logic – and we present to the court the logic that ‘no man has authority over any other without their consent’ – if the court claims so to have… show the law.
The authority of statutes are imposed legally upon ‘persons’ which are corporations. The legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE is a corporate entity. ‘Person’ is not defined in statute law as ‘a man’ and therefore it isn’t ‘a man.’ The authority imposed upon the legal fiction the ‘person’ transfers to the man upon consent – upon using ‘the name’ of ‘the person.’ No consent = no authority. Imposed authority is coercion. Coercion is unlawful.
The name MICHEAL CLARKE does not attach itself to a man as a compulsion… is happens only by consent.
No authority exist that permits one man to impose his will on another man without his consent… this is unlawful. The government can however claim authority over the legal fiction, created by government.
The court repeatedly avoids this issue… because the legal fiction is the foundation of its authority and with this revealed… the true authority of the court i.e. ‘the consent of the people’ is exposed. The courts paranoia – that it will lose its authority if the legal fiction is exposed is unfounded… the reverse is now the case… the legal fiction (115 million pages on Google) is well and truly established as a fact and the continued denial by the High Court only serves to diminish its authority… by diminishing trust in it. It must surely be the case that Judges who continue to deny the legal fiction will attract cynicism and distrust to all judgments of the court, thus bringing it into disrepute.
No group of men can write regulations (Acts of parliament) to subject other men to their arbitrary authority – we are governed by consent – this is not a hollow claim – it is a maxim and is the very foundation of our governance. Statutes have only equal authority of government, they do not exceed that authority – thus statutes must also be subject to our consent and the withdrawal of same.
We know fully how that consent has been secured through the legal fiction… High Court judges know how consent is secured through the legal fiction and through presumptions, in the absence of the denial of consent.
Let it be made clear… consent is and has been denied consistently – all presumptions and assumptions are denied.
The jurisdiction of the court is subject to the consent of all parties to a dispute.
If the ‘High Court’ insists on asserting that it has authority beyond consent over the man (not the legal fiction) then show the law that authorises it. If the court insists on imposing its claimed authority - in the face of the denial of consent then a claim is raised that a tort has been committed against the man and the liability falls to the administrator of the court.
If the High Court will not give way to the demands of the people that it respect and uphold our laws - then its authority evaporates… and its relevance diminished to nought. All that remains is tyranny.
The jurisdiction of the court is challenged on several levels… even under its own rules.
No case to answer: There is no subject matter. Late delivery by the Pannone.
Hearsay (written affidavits) inadmissible – due to ‘Notice of intention to rely on such evidence’ not given.
The court claims to control who can and cannot address the court. ‘No right of audience’ this is a patently bias in favour of the legal profession – bias is unlawful. A judge who imposes the restriction of ‘No right of audience’ must recuse themselves for bias. [Barristers are servants of the court – this is a conflict of interest where the ‘defendant’ is challenging the authority of the court.]
Representation in court by individuals who are not servants of the court will be more robust in their challenges of the court. The exposure of the legal fiction is testament to this.
Challenge to the legitimacy of the judge:
· The authority of the High Court judge is challenged - where there is no evidence of the authority so claimed then none exists. We have moved beyond ‘authority by assumption.’ Authority by one can only be imposed on another with their consent… if no consent is given then the imposition of authority implies a master slave relationship… slavery is repugnant and goes against the basic principles of a civil society – those who insist on the imposition of their authority without consent are tyrants – and tyrants are a threat to the peaceful coexistence of all free people – they must be vanquished.
· Tyrants have been dealt with before – Magna Carta and the Declaration of Rights is the legacy of that struggle and these laws are at our disposal today to strike down any new attempts at tyranny – even when it comes dressed up as law.
· Acts of Parliament are not laws… if they were, they would be called Laws of Parliament. Acts of Parliament are merely statutes, they are referred to as statutes … and statutes gain the authority of law when they are consented to. We are not adverse to consenting to statutes – but those designed to impose overbearing control will be opposed – and rightly so.
· The constant imposition of unreasonable statutes is the flint to the dry grass… and the judiciary may be the first bale to burn.
· The authority of the judge derives from the sovereignty of the people on whose behalf they administer justice… they do not impose their decisions on their own created authority. The people’s authority is represented by our Sovereign Monarch… to whom the judiciary give sworn allegiance that they will uphold our laws.
· If there is any diminishment of the standing of the Monarch then the authority of the judge fails because he/she too would lose standing.
· Where the Monarch’s authority fails… the people’s authority remains intact… because the people’s sovereignty is supreme.
· Where the Monarch’s authority fails – so does the judges – who must then seek a new authority from the people… not from politician’s as this would destroy the fundamental principle of the separation of powers – and judges cannot create their own arbitrary authority.
· The Monarch’s authority has failed… brought about by the duplicity of parliament which has surrendered its own authority contrary to our constitution. Her majesty did not prevent the surrender of parliament to a foreign power by refusing the Royal Assent – despite over a million signatories in petition. Parliament may well have surrendered its sovereignty to a foreign power… but the people’s sovereignty remains intact.
· The people’s sovereignty is secure and our constitution defends it through its various elements such as Magna Carta.
· Magna Carta is the law and judges of the High Court must submit to it – or suffer the consequences of the law.
· Nobody is above the law – and that includes High Court judges.
· Lord Scarman said… “A government above the law is a menace to be defeated”
· It is undeniably the case that a judiciary above the law is a tyranny to be defeated………. our law is unequivocal and it is this: - “No man shall be imprisoned without a jury of his peers”
· It seems that today’s judges have been ‘trained’ beyond the capacity to understand this basic and simple logic.
· Those judges who step over that mark and act in defiance of our law must be held to account and striped of their duties – and their pensions.
· If this court does not concede to the demand of a trial by jury then that demand will go to the highest court in the land… the people’s grand jury – to settle this matter once and for all.
· If it is necessary for the people’s grand jury to be called upon… and it finds in favour of trial by jury as it surely will because it is the unquestionable right of the people, then the full body of High Court judges will have to be dismissed and replaced. It is not beyond the powers of the people to do this.
· The sovereignty of the people is not in question – but the sovereignty of Her Majesty must be seen to be in doubt – if the claim made by John Major (Ex Premier) has any validity. Major said of the Queen “ The Queen is a citizen of the European Union” – this claim is to imagine the death of the Queen. The Prime Minister would not make that statement without legal advice because of the constitutional significance.
· The implications are that the Queen has accepted mediatisation. i.e. she is no longer sovereign.
· If the Queen is no longer sovereign – where do the courts and judges claim to have secured their authority?
· The political establishment have devised a wheeze to avoid this vital question… they obfuscate with the phrase ‘shared sovereignty’ which is an oxymoron and can be discounted as nonsense.
· We either have sovereignty or we do not. If we have sovereignty then the authority of the court is not in question… only its actions. Its actions to deny trial by jury are unlawful. There may be some ‘legal’ provision to deny a trial by jury (it is doubtful) but even if there were -‘legal’ is not ‘lawful’ and where they are in conflict then ‘the legal’ provision would not stand because it would be defeated by our common law (supreme law).
· If the Queen is no longer sovereign, then the authority of the High Court falls on this reality. If the Queen is still Sovereign then there should be no problem getting confirmation of this fact from Her Majesty… there are channels to secure this written confirmation by Her Majesty’s Private Secretary. This is not beyond the capability of the High Court for Her Majesty’s Sovereignty to be confirmed in writing. Silence will tell all.
Re: Constitutional Monarchy
· The United Kingdom is defined as a constitutional monarchy because we have both a constitution and our Head of State is a Monarch. Our constitution defines our form of government – the government does not define our form of constitution – in recent times this principle has been unlawfully reversed without the consent of the people and has been carried out by unscrupulous politicians, aided and abetted by members of the legal profession. The courts to date have made no contribution to stopping this process of change that has diminished the people’s sovereignty whilst enhancing authority elsewhere including with foreign institutions.
· If the sovereignty of the people has been compromised and the reversal is not challenged, then we are clearly culpable through our own apathy.
· The constitution is the foundation of our freedoms and our liberties and MUST be upheld by the courts… or the courts must be abandoned.
· We now have a government that seeks to rewrite our constitution and by so doing empower itself – at our expense.
· A demand for jury trial is exercising our constitutional rights, which if denied gives evidence of collusion by the courts with unlawful governance – we cannot be allowed to stand. This is treason.
· No order made by a court that lacks jurisdiction has any authority – it is void.
· A void order cannot be breached – the order does not exist.
Does the court claim that MICHAEL CLARKE is a man? – then let the court provide the proof. The evidence of logic to the contrary overrides any such claim.
Does the court claim authority over the man? – Then Let the court provide the proof.
Can ‘the judge’ give evidence of his authority… his oath of office? His Warrant from the Queen?
Is the Queen still Sovereign? The evidence suggest not.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
We understand that the judiciary take oath amongst themselves not to engage in any discussion in court re the legal fiction entity and under pressure to do so they are instructed to abandon the court… suppression of the fact re the legal fiction being paramount.
There is recurring evidence to support this claim… the judiciary will not discuss this matter – which gives rise to the certainly of the legal fiction. There are in excess of 115 million web sites on Google which overwhelming support the concept of the legal fiction… this is quite staggering - there is random but sparse opposition to the idea… logic dominates. To reinforce the position… the judiciary will not engage.
If the judiciary serve another master… then they must recuse themselves.
We understand that the court order stipulated that MICHEAL CLARKE should appear before the court – and this order has been complied with. If the court dissents – then the court should give evidence as to who the name is. A judicial determination.
The man is prepared to present himself to a court of law… he is not adverse to justifying his actions… but he will not respond to coercion and the threat of violence against him made BY THE COURT – coercion is unlawful – the courts themselves are not above the law.
The man will make himself available to a common law court.
Show the law where the court claims the authority to imprison a man without a jury of his peers. We present Magna Carta as the law – well established… that says he must have a jury trial.
The CPR may not provide for a jury trial – but nor does it provide for its exclusion. Nor does it claim the right to suppress our constitution… it seems to leave this to individual judges… if they are bold enough to do so. Surely the CPR rules are a trap for unwitting judges.
The matter to hand:
Contempt of Court.
· Honestly held belief: Freemen have an honestly held belief that they have a right to a fair trial… which means a jury trial – and that statute courts are subject to consent. Where there is no jury trial facilitated by the court and no consent given by the man then there is a legitimate challenge that orders of the court are void.
· The denial of a jury trial is bias.
· No contempt of court can be claimed to exist where no jurisdiction exists… and where no order has been breached because the order is void.
· If the court does not have jurisdiction… on subject matter… then its order is void… and ignoring those orders is therefore not a contempt of the court.
· Any denial of due process would warrant a claim of a void order.
· The threat of force is coercion:
· THE JUDGE may take it upon himself to engage force to demonstrate his unproven authority… this would be deemed a criminal act in the eyes of the man - the man reserves the right to use all lawful means to defend his rights, freedoms and liberties… and he reserves the right to pursue justice beyond the court system if this fails in its duty to preserve impartiality.
· The people’s authority must prevail – through the rule of law – not the rule-of-force.
· If the ‘High Court’ threatens us with violence to secure its claimed authority – we have no option but to concede under duress. But there should be no doubt about the dynamics of the situation thus created. Our concession should not be construed as an act of weakness – we will be pragmatic in the face of adversity – and bide our time.
The people of Britain have a right to rebel against arbitrary and unjust governance… that this exists is demonstrable. The Lawful Rebellion movement gathers momentum and the underlying demand is that the government and the judiciary respect our common law right of which Magna Carta is a foundation.
Where the judiciary will not recognise Magna Carta… we will not recognise them.
The ball is in the court. What game shall we play?
The Real issue-
The real purpose of the harassment claim – it is an attempt to gag.
The man has claimed that ‘in his view’ one of the partners, also a plaintiff - Hugh Jones - is a crook who has stolen his mother’s money.
He has called on the partners in Pannones to investigate and provide a thorough and transparent investigation… which they have refused to do. Pannones defer their responsibility to an external body… the secretive ‘Court of Protection’ which according to the accounts of many… is protecting criminality, not vulnerable people.
The man has good cause to claim that there is collusion between Hugh Jones, the Court of Protection and their ombudsman… again these impressive sounding ‘bodies’ of so called authority are always represented by a single individual, all of whom hail from the same profession… the opportunity for collusion and corruption is not unimaginable… and hence why the man has pursued the common law process of a commercial lien.
The man has a lawfully obtained and fully perfected commercial lien against the Pannone Partners to the value of Nine Million pounds. The man has every right to pursue payment of this debt and no court has the right to deny this.
Another single member of the legal profession (a judge) tried to declare this illegal… which is fine because the commercial lien process claims no ‘legal’ status… it is entirely an animal of the common law process and is thus ‘lawful’ and derives it legitimacy through common law and irrefutable logic.
It is telling that Pannones have done everything in their power to avoid the simple process of an internal inquiry into the allegations of corruption of one of their partners… it raises serious questions as to WHY? What have they got to hide.
Pannones get their business from the Court of Protection… the Court of Protection have appointed Hugh Jones… and the Court of Protection cannot be investigated. Hugh Jones and Pannones could ‘thank’ the Court of Protection and nobody would know…. The ‘set-up’ is protected… this is probably why it is called the Court of Protection
Pannones are desperate to gag the man… using the harassment Act and the man is determined to expose the alleged corruption, using the pressure of persistence – because there is no remedy in the legal system.
The man has a duty to prevent crime when he sees it happening… and this is precisely what he is doing.
The man has declared war on Pannones… despite all the pressure he has brought to bear, they have still not investigated Hugh Jones – ONE HAS TO ASK – WHY?
On the balance of probability… it seems that there is more to Pannone’s refusal to provide a proper and meaningful explanation of where the man’s mother’s money has gone… in their robustness to avoid answering some simple questions Pannones have preferred to subjected themselves to a ‘sustained pressure’ to expose the truth.
Pannones would obviously like the pressure to stop… and it is so easily achieved. Provide the answers re the alleged corruption by Hugh Jones and the problem will disappear.
Sustained pressure… is not harassment. It is a legitimate method to prevent crime when the ‘appropriate bodies’ refuse to do so.
The Great Irony.
One of the plaintiffs in this matter a Mr Paul Jonson –titles himself as HEAD OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONS - an offer was made to Paul Jonson for mediation in an attempt to ‘resolve’ the matter – which was declined by him.
It seems that the Pannones crew are a strange bunch - simple not what they claim to be… with a resolutions department that avoids resolution and a protection department allegedly not protecting - and with some very important issues about alleged corruption in their ranks to still to address.
The claim of harassment is a gagging ploy.
The exposure of Pannones as a direct consequence of the man’s probing may reveal that there is more to this than meets the eye. We should applaud the man for his persistence – and condemn Pannones for their evasion of the truth.T
Pannones had the choice of going the very easy route - by providing transparency and answers to easy questions… or the enormously hard route of prevarication and dodging the issue - subjecting themselves to a barrage of pressure (all is fair in love and war… and it is Pannones after all who declared war on the man).
Why did they choose the hard route if they had nothing to hide?
This issue is not going to go away… Pannones need to face up to the reality that they will either settle this matter by resolution or they are going to spend the next few years fighting more claims… the commercial lien of nine million pounds is lawfully enforceable… no Statute judge has the authority to defeat a common law process. They are acting beyond their authority – probably due to ignorance.
The man has made a statutory declaration that he is NOT the legal fiction Michael Clarke.
The court order that MICHAEL CLARKE appear – has been complied with.
The order if it is claimed to be against the man – is void.
Anyone got a friend who works for a National paper.
Subject: The silent majority
This letter says it all......
Subject: The silent majority
Its sad but true, It is difficult not to agree with the 72 year old man who wrote this letter, I notice there isnt a reply.
This is one of the best letters I have read for a long time, it puts it ALL into perspective. PLEASE PASS IT ON to everyone you can, its time BOTH parties stood up and listened.
This is our country and its being destroyed.
To David Cameron (Prime Minister) & Ed Milliband (Leader of the Opposition) ...
You BOTH Worry me ! ( In fact both of your Political parties worry the hell out of me !!!)
Over the last three years, I find myself becoming more and more fearful of the pair of you, and between you, you are turning this country into a place that I no longer feel at home in, or feel a part of! I watch you in parliament, and no, not just the two of you, but every politician that I see, stand up in parliament sneering at each other, and acting like children !!! (..and if you were my children, I would be ashamed of you all ... What an example to set!)