READ a 1 page brief synopsis & 4 page SUBMISSION to the LORDS
or 5page overview. Take me to the NUTS & BOLTS OF EVIDENCE
Or here you can listen to the LINK of 1 hour radio interview 11/4/2014
Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable "whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash!
These Websites published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article10(1) READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT
Sui juris, in propria persona
LIVE DIARY UPDATES with website:
& >> -
2010 to 2012 .. Read 2013 .. Read 2014 .. Read 2015 .. Read 2016
RELEASE my home & £20 million CLAIM STONEWALLED 31.7.15

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626 to

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626870 to
Re: Re- where you are in Thailand
To diansmt5
Hi Diana
we are in PATTAYA
The hospital today will NOT admit mum without 50,000 baht on deposit (£1000)
I only had £200 so could not proceed and so mum is just sat here waiting to DIE.
I have tried more food and different drinks but it is very laboured and she is only achieving at best a quarter of what is put before her. She has lost weight and the matter deteriorates by each day.
JAMESs my partner has been trying to raise money via his family which as of yet is of no avail.
Do not know what to do.
THIS application to release mums property IMMEDIATELY was put into the court as an URGENT MATTER last JULY 2015.
What more can I do??
anxious son and 20 year carer of mum 75 disabled with capacity
On February 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM wrote:

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626868 to
-----Original Message-----
From: diansmt5
To: lyttonj
Sent: Thu, Feb 4, 2016 11:35 AM
Subject: Re- Elderly lady being put at risk by Land Registry involvement of her property
Diana Smith
Corner Farm
Rotten Row
Theddlethorpe St Helen
LN12 1NX
Dear Sir
games are being played with a ladies life , by restrictions placed at Land Registry in regard of a property she owns in Blackpool.
This lady who has been forced to flee England with her long term carer ( her son) , to Thailand, urgently needs medical care and admitting to a hospital today.
Previously her medical fees have been funded by well wishers and because of the urgency of her needs , there is not time to raise funds again to enable acting immediately.
The MP involved is Gordon Marsden and l have had two calls today from a gentleman named john in this MP's Office.
There has to be procedures to release funds this lady is entitled to . If she was resident in the UK , the medical fees potentially would be fifteen times as much as hospital costs where she is presently situated.
Can you advise this MP?
We are likely to see more and more cases like this , as Land Registry, once involved , lack any moral fibre or flexibility and sidestep the real issues of their involvement in what is more and more being perceived as government targeting of vulnerable persons for asset stripping.
Previously Jonathan Smithers in writing assured me that The Law Society is well aware,of the methodology of the fraud behind "over-riding interests" and the complications the open register at Land Registry has allowed, as this was when he headed up the Property / Land Fraud Division of the Law Society and he is now President of The Law Society, with no changes happening to victims of these crimes, perhaps he can be challenged on these very issues?
Kind regards
Diana Smith. Tel. 01507 473053

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626860 to

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626857 to

We also wrote to the NEWSPAPER "THE MATURE TIMES" who we are led to believe are considering publishing the theft of old folks homes.

FEBRUARY 4 2016@3.30am Thai Visiter No.626842 to
She is sleeping soundly at the minute but in the morning we are taking her down to the hospital in THAILAND to receive treatment as she has not been well at all. She is sleeping right now & we THANK YOU again to friends, Steve P & Andy K & Steve H whom have raised some cash to be able to do this and we will keep you all posted.

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626841 to

FEBRUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.626798 to

BROTHER & SISTER request for help... Regardless of all our differences and that they do not agree with their mothers wishes I remember when our father died of throat cancer and there was no money for the funeral and we all had to fork out £800 each for the £2400 burial. This of course was no problem so why now should it be a problem to help their own mother, to keep her alive, in circumstances where the UK state has stole by fraud and mal administration from her estate, forcing her by persecution into exile as refugees from our homeland, effectively cleansed in an act genocide by a GROSS FUDICIARY TRUST FRAUD of the LEGAL NAME forcing innocents into MARITIME ADMIRALTY jurisdiction against their will, so they can plunder estates to the point of causing death. PLEASE SHARE FAR AND WIDE


BUT yet she has the money to fly to THAILAND and to force her mother back to the UK?? 3 flights@£400 = £1200 KEEP in mind of course that mum is unfit to fly currently and that is if she actually wanted to go, otherwise force would be used.
30 minutes later 2nd MESSAGE from SISTER

REPLY 2 messages received: Remember 20 years ago when you dropped her off at my pub, sorry, dumped her at my pub, saying you could not do it, she needed to go into a care HOME! Why did you do that? Why did you not take her to a care home? I took her in to my pub and have cared for her 20 years and now you SAY.. I am killing her!! HOW utter dispicable you are.

REPLY DID all the other victims of persecution, theft and fraud also fabricate evidence that they have too?? Too many to mention here but a few; LEONARD LAWRENCE PILOT had a house of £750,000 was incapacitated and woke up to find his house had been sold and so had no where to live with only £82,000 change! YVONNE GODER, GARY HOLLIS & his brother ADRIAN, JEAN JAMES, 90 yr old NORMAN SCARTH and many many others not discounting PETER HOFSCHROER, read it, and his mum living in AUSTRIA, a part of EUROPE where his brother whom worked in social service came to AUSTRIA had him arrested on false charges whilst SOCIAL SERVICES UK his brother, abducted the mother BARBARA on to a flight back to UK. EUROPE is all party to the FRAUDs. YOU HAVE NO IDEA whats going on do you? YOU think you own your own house! YOU DONT!

FEBRUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.626778 to

Again my mum is unwell and cannot access her own wealth to fund health care because of RESTRICTIONS by the court of protection probate racketeering mafia, when she has already been financially raped by them, when all along, could prove her capacity. LET it be known here and NOW the UNITED KINGDOM perpetrators of the current RAPE & potential MURDER is JUDGE JACKSON & JUDGE PELLING who have acted outside their remit ultravirusly, treasonously and negligently causing harm, loss and injury probably going to result in MURDER!
I will personally hold all involved fully responsible should my mother progessively become more ill and let this be a warning for you here and NOW! The same shall apply to civil servants such as the vicariously liable MPs GORDON MARSDEN, Sec of STATE for Justice MICHEAL GOVE, attorney general JEREMY WRIGHT and others for this is now becoming a VERY serious matter to me & mum.

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626759 to
Joanne Earley to
Dear Mike Clarke,
I have nothing further to add to my email of the 1st February 2016 and I will not be acknowledging any further similar messages.
Joanne Earley
Operations Manager
Court of Protection
T: 020 7421 8722
M: 078 2606 9598

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626752 to

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626748 to
& head of courts administration Jillian KAY
Dear Michael, Jeremy, Jillian & Gordon
I am copying you in to the email exchange yesterday with the court of protection manager JOANNE EARLEY.
It would appear to me that JOANNE EARLEY is committing MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE in an effort to PERVERT the course of JUSTICE.
It is becoming extremely urgent that this matter is looked into and properly as matters appear totally unjust & unfair breaching HUMAN RIGHTS.
We have been seeking our RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION to Parliament through our MP Gordon Marsden which would appear to be to no avail.
It seems OK for the COURT to serve me by email but to serve back by email or even recorded delivery mail - refused!!!
by: mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626747 to
As per our last email which you were copied in below.
The court of protection appear to be picking and choosing which NOTICES to serve on JUDGES and which not!!
THIS to me is MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC office perverting the course of justice.
Therefore can I have confirmation from YOU that all notices in the email below have been served on JUDGE JACKSON.
If not can you please tell the exact process to complete such a service ie
1.his private home mailing address which I am currently researching
2.or the full address for sessions house Preston or
3.what other method you deem fit and proper to serve JUDGE JACKSON
by: mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626729 to
RE: copied Fwd: confirmation required of service
To Joanne Earley — managingeditor and 7 others
Can I just get this correct.
Are you saying that a NOTICE to a JUDGE cannot be served to his place of BUSINESS ie Court of Protection??
If that is so can you please advise by return HOW IS A JUDGE SERVED relevant NOTICEs??
for example a JUDICIAL NOTICE?
Or at the very least what is the address for service of documents for Court of Protection JUDGES, PELLING & JACKSON??
I do have recorded delivery receipts for them.. are you saying the COURT refuses to serve them, having signed for them???
It seems a little confusing when the documents are VERY relevant to the overall case and that your saying I cannot serve a JUDGE through a COURT OF PROTECTION ADDRESS.
It does seem hypocritical when you want to serve me by email and I honourably accept, IS THE COURT ACTING IN DISHONOUR?
Please respond immediately that I may refer the matter to my MP and the ATTORNEY GENERAL and Sec of State for Justice Michael GOVE.
Considering I am in EXILE half way round the world do you think that this is a court acting in HONOUR and in the best interest of terrorised patient with CAPACITY??
Of THE NOTICES CONCERNED.... can you please indicate which ones you have chose NOT to serve which may I point out would indicate an offence of MISCONDUCT IN A PUBLIC OFFICE assuming you are the person deciding what to serve and what not to serve?
http:​//opg.​me/urgentapplication01092015.​pdf​ ORIGINAL APPLICATION NOTICE
http:​//opg.​me/jacksonorder.​pdf​ REQUESTED STATEMENT NOTICE
http:​//opg.​me/vacateyourorder.​pdf​ NOTICE TO JUDGE PELLING
http:​//opg.​me/statementtojackson2016.​pdf​ STATEMENT REQUESTED NOTICE
Regards by: mike: clarke

On February 1, 2016 at 6:27 PM Earley, Joanne wrote:
Dear Mike Clarke,
I am writing in response to your email below, documents that you have been directed to file by the court will be forwarded to Mr Justice Peter Jackson, but the court will not serve other documents on your behalf.
Joanne Earley Operations Manager
Court of Protection T: 020 7421 8722 M: 078 2606 9598
From: mike [] Sent: 29 January 2016 09:12
To: Earley, Joanne
Subject: copied Fwd: confirmation required of service

NO RESPONSE received - copied and re sent to JOANNE EARLEY
---------- Original Message ----------
From: mike
To: joanne.earley
Date: January 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM
Subject: confirmation required of service

COURT of Protection MANAGER
Dear Joanne
I hope this email finds you well.
7 DAYS/ONE WEEK AGO ie 20.1.2016
I served upon the court previously the attached or linked below 2 documents;
http:​//opg.​me/executorletters.​pdf​ EXECUTOR LETTERS TO PELLING AND JACKSON
Will you please confirm by return that both these JUDGES were indeed served with the above documents??
I also would like you to note from hereon in NOT to refer to me as MISTER/Mr as my name is mike or michael raymond: clarke.
This is by small case letters and not higher case any infringement is a breach of trademark & copyright of the ALL CAPS estate name that is indeed a legal fiction corporation entity copyrighted trademarked
regards mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626696 to
In July 2015 my mum and I decided it best to stay out of the UK for good due to the outrageous criminality that is obviously exposed here within our website that is running rampant unabated.
A simple task one might assume, to sell up and live in another kingdom elsewhere in the world.
THE criminals within the UK are preventing this and have been so for a very long time.
THEY hold absolutely NO jurisdiction to do what they are doing and their rule books and law books presumeably have been thrown out the window.
Their frauds fully exposed, they still, have not responded to all lawful approaches, and so February is likely to bring even grander charges to lay at their feet.
In the meantime my disabled mum continues to suffer at their hands at the age of 75. She has not been in her own safe n comfortable environment now for 3 whole years. Denied access to disabled facilities all geared up for her. SUCH a starvation has led to her physical and mental deteriation that is bringing about an early demise.
Its perhaps as well that a VOID fraudulent order of committal to prison is in place because such injustice calls for retribution on a grand scale, a scale that reflects the crimes that have been purpotrated upon my own flesh and blood disabled mother.
LIFE was hard enough just dealing with the day to day hour by hour routines, but to take on taboo is another mountain to climb.

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626695 to

Published on 31 Jan 2016 Truth on Billboards on the roadside. Why? Because it's illegal to use a legal name. You were set up as a criminal, a felon since birth, via the legal name fraud scam that fleeces humanity by their own ignorant consent.

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626682 to

Published on 11 Dec 2015 -

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626671 to

The Court of Protection JEWdiciary, ie PELLING & JACKSON were served their treason notice on the 20th January 2016 by recorded delivery in which they were given 10 days to respond, that expires today.
Failing such response we are NOW in tacit agreement by acquiescence of the said content.
The Jewdiciary were also served 3 times an OCCUPANT of the OFFICE of EXECUTOR NOTICE & LETTER for the ESTATES of ANN CLARKE & MICHAEL CLARKE instructing them to act in accordance with the filed statements & affidavids of truth, in the form of commercial liens, that were NOTARISED and cured / perfected over the times permitted which now stand as the TRUTH in law, with financial penalties attached as remedy.
As an honourable man, I have and are, providing ample opportunity to these men to justly correct their injustices that they have been a party to.
LET it hereby be known by this entry, that the clock is ticking with time running out before I seek higher penalties.

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626670 to

JANUARY 31 2016 Visiter No.626665 to

JANUARY 30 2016 Visiter No.626664 to
David Robinson -
Good afternoon rebels.....
Many people seem to be suspicious of pledging their allegiance for the barons committee to direct the rebellion and we need to have a little chat about this matter....clear a few misconceptions up I think.
Firstly, the barons committee invoked article 61 for the people to use. They have directed us to rebel by invoking it.
Secondly, the barons committee are in service to the sovereign people not the other way around, and they must act (as we all must) strictly according to constitutional law, they cannot deviate from the constitution with their direction. Most people don't seem to realize that the constitution provides the people with a system of justice, it enshrines our human rights we don't need the UN's or the EU's we have all we need within our own constitution. Why do you think they are attempting to destroy it and deny its existence even?
The fact that the barons are AWOL (some have passed on, others are to old or ill to be of service) does not matter at this stage. We should at least be grateful that they had the courage to invoke article 61 when they did. They were kicked out of the House of Lords for doing so and I wonder what else the regime threw at them 15 years ago?
The Magna Carta security clause (article 61) makes it a demand that the people stand under this most important tenet when it has been invoked, because that is the only remedy...mass disobedience. There is no other way to defeat institutionalised treason, a peaceful lawful rejection of the corrupt regime plus, the lobbying of the police to observe the evidential truth, and to stand with the people again is the best way to end this treason effectively, and peacefully. IT CAN AND MUST BE DONE. Without sovereignty there is ONLY slavery...and we haven't seen anything yet!
We can compel the surviving barons to convene grand juries under article 52 of Magna Carta 1215 when enough of us have woken up to the remedy here. It would be an act of treason to deny article 52 when the people cannot get remedy within the present judicial system.
All this remedy requires is MORE PEOPLE to join the rebellion.....why would any sane person or being bit stop supporting paedophiles, terrorists, war criminals, liars and thieves when the law demands it?
You don't need to send an Oath to one of the barons you just need to pledge allegiance to them directing it and get on with it yourself. The Oath serves as evidence of your lawful position and intent. You cannot be claimed to be an outlaw, with no protection of the law.
At the end of the day folk we have a solution to the occupation of our land by the EU and to get these traitors arrested and we need to unite to do this. Even if you don't entirely agree with the constitution and common law it is insane to run from the cure WE HAVE PROVEN WORKS! We are running out of time Agenda 21/ 20-30 and TTIP are upon us...the occupation of our land by the EU and destruction of our constitution is almost complete....only we the people standing together in open peaceful rebellion can stop the NWO tyranny in its tracks...that means YOU need to help, YES YOU!.
Once we have restored the system of service we are supposed to be enjoying, we will have much fewer taxes to pay, proper justice in the courts....only 4 laws to abide by and a lot more freedom. Truth will be heard on the MSM (instead of nothing but lies) We will NOT be at war with other sovereign fracking, geo-engineering, debt based currency, no propaganda in schools and no nanny state to tell you how to bring up your children etc.... .......things can change very quickly it just depends on whether you want to change it. We have no choice though, the alternative will be forced vaccinations, micro-chipping. more rules to strip us of our freedom, no private property and no dissent against the corruption without punishment. No access to the countryside (Agenda 21) absolute corporate fascism (TTIP) the choice is purely yours to make. Either defend the realm by using the constitution to protect it and us, or accept the NWO without complaint. Peace.

JANUARY 30 2016 Visiter No.626645 to

JANUARY 30 2016 Visiter No.626643 to

JANUARY 29 2016 Visiter No.626627 to
London Business office of our MP GORDON MARSDEN was telephoned and in a conversation with a NICK WRIGHT about who I was and that I confirmed the bad telephone line was because I was speaking from THAILAND and he then said oh yes is this the RIGHT of GRIEVANCE PETITION request to which I replied yes.
He then tried to divert me to the constituency office whom according to him were looking into it.
I said that over two weeks had past awaiting the official request response to which there had been none.
He said that this was because of the complexity they had not responded until they are fully aware of all the facts.
I said that he may be aware of that but they whom are supposedly dealing with it had left us completely in the dark, to which he said he would 'chase it up'.
Constituency Office
304 Highfield Road
Telephone Number: 01253 344143
Business Telephone Number: 0207 2191262

JANUARY 29 2016 Visiter No.626621 to
COURT of Protection MANAGER
29th Jan 2016 2nd request
Dear Joanne
I hope this email finds you well.
7 DAYS/ONE WEEK AGO ie 20.1.2016
I served upon the court previously the attached or linked below 2 documents;
Will you please confirm by return that both these JUDGES were indeed served with the above documents??
I also would like you to note from hereon in NOT to refer to me as MISTER/Mr as my name is mike or michael raymond: clarke.
This is by small case letters and not higher case any infringement is a breach of trademark & copyright of the ALL CAPS estate name that is indeed a legal fiction corporation entity copyrighted trademarked
mike: clarke

JANUARY 29 2016 Visiter No.626614 to

JANUARY 28 2016 Visiter No.626568 to

JANUARY 28 2016 Visiter No.626557 to
simple message - LEAVE the E.U.

JANUARY 27 2016 Visiter No.626540 to
COURT of Protection MANAGER
Dear Joanne
I hope this email finds you well.
7 DAYS/ONE WEEK AGO ie 20.1.2016
I served upon the court previously the attached or linked below 2 documents;
Will you please confirm by return that both these JUDGES were indeed served with the above documents??
I also would like you to note from hereon in NOT to refer to me as MISTER/Mr as my name is mike or michael raymond: clarke.
This is by small case letters and not higher case any infringement is a breach of trademark & copyright of the ALL CAPS estate name that is indeed a legal fiction corporation entity copyrighted trademarked
mike: clarke

JANUARY 27 2016 Visiter No.626534 to
Extra-Judicial Notice Issued to the Justices of THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
There is no provision upon land nor upon sea nor in the heavens allowing a corporation to declare war, declare martial law, operate as a crime syndicate, or interfere with the political standing of living people.
When what is true appears what is false must pass away.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has engaged in criminal acts and that it is at this moment shredding documents to avoid its culpability.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that the FBI has committed murder and false arrest of peaceful American state citizens in Oregon for protesting the unlawful and illegal acts of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and that it has stubbornly refused to recognize the political standing of its victims.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that the corporations you work for including the UN Corporation, the IMF, the UNITED STATES, the FEDERAL RESERVE ---which are international banks and their subsidiaries and subcontractors--- are operating as crime syndicates on our shores.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations have all been granted due process and have all merited their dissolution by their own continued acts of criminality and non-compliance and violation of their charters.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations have knowingly engaged in falsification of political status and probate records for their own enrichment.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations have knowingly operated public offices and allowed their employees to impersonate public officials for private gain.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations are now in the process to trying to avoid their culpability for these acts of violence and predation upon the people that they are under contract and obligation to serve.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations are now attacking Americans just as they attacked the people of India under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi.
This is your private and inescapable Notice that these corporations are here on our soil in violation of their Treaties and Charters and that they have willfully committed war crimes upon the innocent and peaceful populace of the American states.
This is your private and inescapable Notice of the Matters of Fact before you.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Federal Postal District Judge Western Region

JANUARY 26 2016 Visiter No.626508 to

JANUARY 26 2016 Visiter No.626488 to

JANUARY 26 2016 Visiter No.626484 to

Once a FRAUD is revealed, ALL contracts, ALL documents, ALL actions resulting from the initial FRAUD are rendered NULL & VOID, Ab Initio, Nunc Pro Tunc, Ad Infinitum. FACT: There is NO Statute of Limitations on the CRIME of FRAUD!
REALITY CHECK TIME! !!! PAY ATTENTION !!! " If you are a PERSON....YOU ARE NOT A MAN. If you do not know what the 'Legal definition' of PERSON is YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT A MAN IS. Therefore, there is NO WAY that you can teach a BOY how to be a MAN. Learn the difference between a MAN and a PERSON first. Then work on yourself. The REAL problems out here are WAY deeper than many of you think. " ~Machette VanHelsing~ P.S. if you do not know etymology or the 'Legal definitions' of words, you READ, SPEAK, WRITE AND TYPE on a 5th grade reading level or lower. Oh yeah, don't be mad at ME for a a sovereign man, have merely shared TRUTH with you all and decided not to leave you in such a backward state of BOY/GIRLHOOD. Now that you know........ DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626478 to

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626475 to
Terry Barnet - This is the Royals, Paedophiles Mason Oath.
Of their Society and their systems and their way of life and customs, and then their Legislative Legal B.A.R. Association Law Society all fraud and fake.
These two are one and the same... as both work with each other.
Still want to go along with the Gestapo Legislative Legal as law ?
Fraudulently Administrating Admiralty Maritimes Legislative Legal Statutes Acts, laws of the sea, upon everyone whom lives upon the land.
There are Paedophiles Masons in all levels of public servants areas. and all are supporters of this Fraud, deceptive Policy's and regulations and so many are fooled into this by threats, and intimidation, harassment, violence, bullying, stolen, kidnapped, abducted and then held to ransom and even forced into a guilty box in their fraud courts when there is no Agreement, Contract, or Consent that was ever given or made, ever.

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626470 to
We highlight here what is going on. The JEWdiciary are facilitating a PROBATE RACKETEERING SCAM of huge gi-normous proportions where what they do from your birth is conceal, by denial/lack of full disclosure, that your birth is then registered as a DEATH certificate that states your birth? CONFUSED! By giving berth that was live your mother inadvertantly registered you, [like a car] not knowing that this transaction was actually giving you over as state property. By this little gem of 'act' under cestui que ve 1666 the FRAUD really starts to gather pace.
Your birthrights are over, you become a slave of the state. The certificate of birth becomes a tradeable bond which the state uses to enslave you all, committed, under admiralty maritime law society of the sea, WHICH has no place on our common law land.
SO acting in the capacity of a dead entity you become a ward of court/state where they can do as they please.
For example, shoe horning us into EUROPE as their chattels/slaves. The fact is, its a fraud by non-disclosure, your rights are there you just need to claim them. A legal fiction is a birth certificate, a corporation & its company name is your ALL CAPS NAME/Mr.

JANUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.626452 to

VIDEO here This follows Mr Steel refusing to be tried by magistrates at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court, insisting that it was his right to be judged by a jury of his peers.
He said he refused to pay his council tax because he believes that the UK’s elections at every level are controlled by a cartel of organised parties which prevent independent candidates, such as himself, from winning.
He added: “Complaints about such elitist crimes are either wholly suppressed or facetiously dismissed.”
During the hearing, Mr Steel produced a camera and tried to film the clerk and the magistrate but was told he was in breach of the law which forbids the filming of court hearings.
When the magistrate and clerk left the court to avoid being filmed, Mr Steel said he had dismissed his own case and also left the courtroom.
However, he then complained that decisions were being made in secret when the court reconvened to conclude the case in his absence.
He said that since no jury had ever convicted someone of recording a court case, he considered his filming of the hearing to be lawful.

JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626440 to


JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626435 to

JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626420 to

OUR MP Gordon Marsden has been very difficult in getting him to act for us in what we obviously consider to be a very serious matter.

JANUARY 24 2016 Visiter No.626413 to

JANUARY 23 2016 Visiter No.626393 to

as she gives me that LOOK of... I want me fag!!

JANUARY 23 2016 Visiter No.626389 to

Knowing what she was about to receive Angela wild refused service because she had already had it by email. TRACED-DELIVERED

served article 61 statement of MISPRISION OF TREASON

JANUARY 22 2016 Visiter No.626360 to

British justice system that you are not aware of - for whistleblowers!!

JANUARY 22 2016 Visiter No.626357 to


filed today @ 9am UK time + 3pm THAILAND time on 21.1.2016
by email and certified as recorded delivery
ref the ESTATES of
attached is EXECUTOR LETTERs
linked also by world wide web here below;

JANUARY 21 2016 Visiter No.626320 to
Dear Joanne EARLEY
Court of Protection MANAGER
21st January 2016
ref ann clarke 10370284
Yesterday I served the hereby attached, sibling reply statement requested by Mr Jackson.
The reply statement was also sent by recorded delivery to both siblings KEVIN CLARKE and ANGELA WILDs addresses by ROYAL MAIL recorded delivery.
This statement was also sent to the aforesaid siblings by their email addresses, current.
The statement was also sent to yourself and Mr Jackson clerk both by email.
With all due respect [having not sent it to you by royal mail recorded] can you now please just confirm by return 2 things;
1.That you have indeed received such a statement &
2.That you have now referred the entire matter back to Mr Jackson
The agonies being suffered in the 15 years of terror being used upon my mum and me needs addressing sooner rather than later.
As you are aware we have already suffered huge delays by the court which we believe, although apologised for, are deliberate.
I hope during the course of these events that subject to your innocence in this matter, you do not take any offence from my abrupt manner, as it certainly is not intended for any innocent beings.
mike: & ann: clarke

Dear Mr Clarke
Please see below email I sent earlier, I just want to confirm you received it as my email is playing up.
Joanne Earley

From: Earley, Joanne To: Sent: Thu Jan 21 12:40:38 2016 Subject: Re: CONFIRMATION required of STATEMENT reply received Dear Mr Clarke, 22.1.2016
I am writing to confirm that I have received your statement and referred it to Mr Justice Jackson.
Joanne Earley
"This Message has been sent from a Blackberry Device"

JANUARY 21 2016 Visiter No.626317 to
Responding to a message from a communicant, I sent the information below.
It may be useful to others, so I forward it now.
Attached are the 2 page letter from the Lord Chancellor's Office, which quotes the words from Hansard. Norman Scarth.
From: Subject: Recording in court. 'The law'. My experience. Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:00:56 +0000
RECORDING IN COURT: My understand of 'The Law', & my own experience, are as follow. It is actually Contempt of Court to take a recording device INTO A COURT BUILDING (without the permission of a judge) - so all those with a modern mobile phone are liable to two years in prison! It is also 'Contempt' to use a camera outside (i.e. in the precincts of) a court building.
From about 1997 I asked permission many times, both in my own civil actions & when acting as McKenzie Friend.
Sometimes permission was refused, sometimes it was granted, notably when I was before Lord Woolf (then Master of the Rolls), LJ Otton & LJ Ward in the Civil Appeal Court in 1999. Lord Woolf allowed me not one recorder, but two, having one of them on the bench before him, he pressing the buttons.
I later produced a transcript, in the same format as the official ones, & sent it to Lord Woolf for his signature that it was an accurate record. He made a couple of minor amendments & then he did sign it. I will find the document, scan it & send it to you.
There is also a record in Hansard of the Attorney General(?) saying in Parliament that there was no wish to prevent people using recorders, & that permission should be granted, unless there were good reasons for refusal. Will try to find that & send it, though looking up Hansard may find it for you.
Now to the civil action for Contempt against me in the High Court on 23/1/2013 (The AG v Norman Scarth). In his judgment, Lord Chief Justice Lord Igor judge (NO LESS!) said that if I had been there (I wasn't, having much belatedly accepted that Britain is not a safe place for people who tell the truth!) he would have allowed me to use a recorder, & would recommend that other judges should do so. You may be able to find that judgment in the official court reports, but I will try to find the relevant page & send it to you.
Of my arrest & imprisonment from the public gallery at Bradford Crown Court, as ordered by Judge Jonathan Lee Rose in 2011, judges & newspapers said that I had 'Showed contempt for the court': I didn't 'show' it - I declared it, loudly & clearly!
Norman Scarth.
PS: Prosecuted for the terrible 'crime' of offering leaflets, there were three hearings in Leeds Mags, & three in Manchester City Mags, at the last of which (23/5/2012) District Judge Jonathan Taaffe fined me £150, with £600 costs. But he also made a 'Restraining Order' that I must not mention Judge Rose's name anywhere.
By mentioning it above, I have now rendered myself liable to five years in prison if I set foot in Britain again!
All together now - -
etc. etc. etc. ."
See http:​//www.​bbc.​co.​uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-2​1845753
for PM Cameron expressing the gratitude of the nation.

JANUARY 20 2016 Visiter No.626298 to

JANUARY 20 2016 Visiter No.626294 to

JANUARY 20 2016 Visiter No.626285 to
My friend sent me this

JANUARY 19 2016 Visiter No.626248 to
On January 19, 2016 at 2:15 PM Earley, Joanne wrote:
Dear Mr Clarke,
Statements were received from both Mrs Angela Wilde and Mr Kevin Clarke on the evening of the 4th January 2016. On the 5th January 2016 the file was referred back to Mr Justice Jackson as outlined in his order of the 3rd November 2015. Once I receive an order from Mr Justice Jackson in this case a copy of it will be served on you at this email address.
Joanne Earley Operations Manager Court of Protection

From: mike []
Sent: 19 January 2016 09:10
To: Earley, Joanne
Dear Joanne
You are aware of course of FULL DISCLOSURE
Please forward by return both statements made by Angela & Kevin.
mike: clarke

Good afternoon Mr Clarke,
Please find attached a copy of the statements from Mrs Angela Wilde and Mr Kevin Clarke, also attached is an additional email that was sent by Mrs Angela Wilde.
Mr Justice Jackson has asked for your response in relation to the attached within 14 days, please note your response should be no longer than 6 pages.
Joanne Earley Operations Manager Court of Protection

Mr Kevin Anthony Clarke
6th January 2015
Re: In the matter of Ann Clarke, case number 10370284
Having read or should I say tried to read, comprehend and digest Michael's statement it only reinforces in my mind that mothers property in Blackpool should not be sold. This statement contains what I can only describe as ramblings on subjects that have no bearing on mums house. I actually fear for Michael's state of mental wellbeing. Should anything happen to him mother will have a home to return to.
There is absolutely no way my mother has written that statement let alone be able to understand the complex matters and details it goes into. I don't understand them myself. People can become institutionalised or radicalised and in my opinion my mother has become Michealized (no such word I know) but this is my feeling.
Selling that house would not be in her best interest but I am sure it will be Michaels. Maybe the proceeds would help him to buy the night club he has set his sights on. This would be of no benefit to our mother.
Yours sincerely, Kevin Clarke

From: Angie Wild Sent: 05 January 2016 21:01
To: Earley, Joanne Subject: Ann Clarke
Case number 10370284
I ANGELA WILD want to let it be known I am totally against the sale of my mothers house, if the house has to be sold I want the money's to be put back in the court of protection.
1. My mother is living out of the country as Micheal Clarke is on the run from the police because he has a prison sentence awaiting him.
2. Micheal has stated on social networking sites he intends to purchase a nightclub abroad with the money's.
3. Micheal has many failed business ventures and I don't want my mothers money going the same way.
4. My mother needs a house to come back to in the event of Michaels demise.
5. Micheal has posted home made videos on his web page asking the queen directly to let them back in the country without sending him to prison. This is not the actions of a stable man.
Yours faithfully Angela wild

From: Angie Wild Sent: 08 January 2016 08:52
To: Earley, Joanne Subject: Ann Clarke
I Angela wild and Kevin Clarke would like to request authorisation to gain access, to look after our mums house while she is out of the country as we believe it is being left unattended with a friend of Michaels having the keys and trying to sell it, a said Steve power.
Regards Angela wild and Kevin Clarke

JANUARY 19 2016 Visiter No.626226 to

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626205 to

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626199 to

here in pdf
Mike Clarke love both these items.. the video and the pdf..
PEN will WIN over the sword or GUN!
& the 1sr BAIL to burn will be THE JEWdiciary

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626195 to

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626180 to

JANUARY 18 2016 Visiter No.626176 to

JANUARY 17 2016 Visiter No.626163 to

A serving policeman who allegedly approached one of Northern Ireland’s most senior judges and threatened to arrest him is to go on trial for contempt of court.
Dressed in full uniform as he attended the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast again today, Thomas Anthony Carlin declined to apologise for his actions at an earlier hearing.
He also rejected an offer of legal representation and asked to have a jury decide on his behaviour towards Lord Justice Gillen. But another judge refused his request, instead listing the case to be heard by him next week.
Mr Justice Horner said: “I’m going to arrange for a trial to take place on this issue of whether or not there has been contempt in the face of the court. I will hear it, there will not be a jury.”
He also warned the policeman that, if found guilty, he could be fined or sent to prison. Mr Carlin’s alleged outburst came at the end of a ruling in a house repossession case in the High Court on Tuesday.
The 43-year-old had been representing himself in the legal battle with Santander bank over a property in Co Antrim. At the end of the hearing he allegedly got up and moved towards the bench, claiming he was going to arrest Lord Justice Gillen.
Security and court staff intervened before he was led from the courtroom. He was arrested on suspicion of two counts of common assault, but subsequently released without charge. The Police Ombudsman was also notified.
Mr Carlin is alleged to have interrupted proceedings without justification, refused to resume his seat, approached the presiding judge, threatened to arrest him without lawful excuse and physically interfered with a court tipstaff. He had been given until today to secure a lawyer, apologise and provide an explanation for his behaviour.
But shortly after entering the courtroom again today in PSNI uniform and hat, Mr Carlin made his position clear. He told Mr Justice Horner: “I believe for me to apologise to the court would be abandoning my defence.”
The offer of legal assistance from a law firm which deals with the Police Federation was also turned down.
Mr Carlin further claimed: “I acted in my capacity as a police officer, I believed a crime had been committed (and) it was outrageous in nature. I believe the tipstaff and court staff who intervened... obstructed me in the execution of my duty.”
At one stage Mr Justice Horner asked if he denied the alleged behaviour set out in writing. The officer replied: “I completely dispute those facts.”
The judge then cautioned him: “You realise that should you be found guilty of contempt in the face of the court you will be liable for a number of penalties including imprisonment.”
Mr Carlin responded that he would comply with the findings of a jury. However, he was told to turn up on Monday for a trial to be decided by Mr Justice Horner alone.

JANUARY 17 2016 Visiter No.626160 to

Britain’s most senior judge, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, wrote last week that “our justice system has become unaffordable to most”.
It’s a remarkable statement for the lord chief justice to make. But unfortunately it’s right. In Britain, in the 21st century, a growing number of people can’t afford to defend themselves and make sure their rights are respected. The facts are startling. In 2009-10, more than 470,000 people received advice or assistance for social welfare issues. By 2013-14, the year after the government’s reforms to legal aid came into force, that number had fallen to less than 53,000 – a drop of nearly 90%.
At the same time, tribunal fees have been introduced and court fees increased, time and again. Advice centres – which provide straightforward guidance on legal problems – have closed across the country. And the “exceptional funding scheme” – the government’s “safety net” for the most vulnerable – has helped a mere eight children since it was created.

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626136 to

How to Sue a Judge Without Using a Lawyer here
The subject is PERSONAGE & BARRATY here
An exercise in the black art of legalese? Or…Why it does matter!

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626134 to
ANNA VON REITZ new statement
Important Details for Everyone
Regarding 12 USC 95a and 95 (2) b:
Americans don't have a "nation" -- we have a country. The term "American National" does not apply to us, either. That is the Federal verbiage for American Samoans, Puerto Ricans, etc.
The "nation" you would be giving your estate to via reversionary trust interest is the Federal United States, not the Continental United States. That is, you would be "donating" your private property to the crooks who defrauded you and your parents and your grandparents in exchange for more of their worthless promissory notes and bunko.
Regarding the Status of the Western States:
Red-line the fact that the Continental Congress (land)is entirely different and separate from the United States Congress (sea). Until you clearly, absolutely grasp this separation of jurisdictions you will be deluded about who "they" are and who "we" are.
They are British Subjects "residing" on our soil. They are supposed to be here loyally providing us with "good faith service" and "essential governmental services" which we are owed. They have instead deliberately and with malice aforethought entrapped (press-ganged) and mischaracterized us as British Crown Subjects, that is, as "debt slaves" in their scheme of things, and have proceeded to rape and plunder the ":public trusts" they established "in our names" without our knowledge or consent. These are venal criminal acts and war crimes.
To date, despite promises to rectify the situation no actual remedy has been received. Under commercial law, when no remedy exists, the aggrieved party is entitled to settle the matter according to their devises so long as it is equitable. We are calling for the return of all our property, the assets we are owed, plus reasonable interest for their use, and damages for their abuse.
Regarding Attempts to Mischaracterize Us and Avoid Paying Us as The Heirs of the Priority Creditors:
We can't let the rats get away with it, and won't. Write to the Members of Congress so that they are fully convinced of their culpability in this matter. We are owed the return of the gold that was stolen -- "confiscated" from our grandparents and the return of our equity exchanged in good faith for their worthless dishonored promissory notes. The entirety of the scheme and those responsible for it must be addressed and the machinery backing it dismantled so that no additional fraudulent claims can be generated.
This means recording our nativity, not registering a "birth". It means administration under the Law of the Land, not the Law of the Sea. It means recognition of the fact that we, not the middlemen banks, are their employers and benefactors and priority creditors.
Regarding the "Global Debt Facility"
The "Global Debt Facility" if you haven't figured it out by now, is a swindle. There's a reason you haven't heard of it before--- it's because it was just a "box" for the bankers to deposit all the ill-gotten loot they've recieved, when and if their receipt of stolen goods was ever discovered. Well, guess what? The stolen nature of the booty has been discovered and those guilty of the theft are scurrying around making deposits so that it won't technically be in their possession when the gate closes and we are all looking around for the thieves.
The World Bank and IBRD and Federal Reserve were all Secondary Creditors in the 1933 Bankruptcy (See "Federal" Title 5) When the dust finally settled and the Priority Creditors--- the American People---had finally paid off all the debts owed by a private, for-profit governemental services corporation doing business as the "United States of America, Inc." these same Secondary Creditors pretended that they didn't know who the Priority Creditors and their Heirs were. They "presumed" that we just "abandoned" the funds and assets and claimed it all for themselves.
Stealing our remaining gold left as an inheritance owed as a result of FDR's confiscations and refusing to repay gold and silver that they received in exchange for fraudulent "debt notes" known as "Federal Reserve Notes" is part and parcel of their attempt to undermine the lawful Republican Government owed to the people of the Continental United States.
Remember HJR 192 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934?
The vermin in Congress established a "dollar for dollar" fixed exchange rate --- one of their promissory notes (I.O.U's) in exchange for one ounce of our silver or a commensurate amount of our gold. Thus they emptied out Fort Knox through the back door, then declared "bankruptcy" of the corporation responsible and left us to stand as "sureties" to pay the debts of their bankrupted corporation on top of robbing us blind.
Not only that, they brought their filthy paws to their buddies in the Bar Association and the administrators of the Holy See and these entities gave them bankruptcy protection, which means they "erred" fantastically and are responsible for the injustice and mistreatment of the American People and their National Trust which they are all obligated under the actual Constitution and the Treaty of Westminster 1794 to protect.
No amount of "pretending" that we don't exist or that we ever voluntarily and knowingly changed our political status to accommodate their predation will work. It simply isn't true and no prudent man would agree to the "contracts" that they pretend were accepted by 390 million prudent men.
So there you go--- all you are seeing via Ms. Hudes is a bunch of crooks trying to find a way out of a major league jam they created.
It's time to drag out the public records and begin the forensic audits and liquidations of the banks and other organizations responsible, or, for the banks and those other organization colluding with the banks to come clean and return the equitable remedy demanded:
1. All our gold returned to the American people and the American Government it is owed to, plus interest;
2. All title and patent to the land that the American people and the American Government is owed, free of lien, encumbrance, or debt of any kind amassed by merely "presumed" Secondary Beneficiaries;
3. Immediate cessation and permanent Estoppel of all fraudulent claims of mortgages or other claims of debt based on the debts of these same "presumed" Secondary Beneficiaries;
4. Return of all equity interest owed to us that has been fraudulently claimed to be "abandoned" funds;
5. Reinstatement of lawful money and private banking without further unlawful conversion or delay.
6. Return of all interest in private property without except to the lawful living people to whom it is owed despite any undisclosed process of "application" or "registration"---- including interest in public resources, businesses, homes, infrastructure, copyrights, patents, and favorable liens.

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626122 to
Mum looking alot brighter after her fall on the morning of the 12th January, 4 days ago that left her having to have 12 stitches in her forhead at the hospital.. poor soul.. it was horrible but thankfully she is recovering.. we have had to change her sleeping arrangements to safeguard against that ever happening again. We have informed the court of how urgent it is to sell mums house to reinstate better care for her here but the court have delayed this application now 6 months in the face of being ordered from me as current Living Will executor to remove the restriction off the land registry.

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626119 to
Everything stated in this post is alleged only.
Peter's trial has been put back AGAIN to July 2016 - because his new "barrister" has not had the time to prepare for the case, while the new solicitors had not got it trial ready despite having months to do so. [outrageous!]. Requests for a bail application continue to be refused. [Why?].
Peter has no idea where his mother Barbara is and no idea how she is because no one will tell him!! Cards / letters wishing this elderly and much persucuted 87 yr-old lady can be sent to her via:
Mrs Barbara Hofschroer, c/o Adult Social Care Team, West Offices, Station Rise, YORK YO1 6GA. It is said she was supposed to be being moved to a "specialist unit", but no one knows, apart from the council etc., if this has happened.
Please write to her at that address and let her know she is not alone. Her abusers have much to answer for. We are told she is now bedridden and permanently crippled due to "falls" at a "care home" she was in. Serious surgery followed on a broken leg. She also contracted pneumonia recently [a "chest ailment"]. Needless to say we have a list of commendations regarding her care whilst she was with P and in his care. It is a public scandal what has happened to her, since leaving P's care, and even since Lord Maginnis's protest in parliament in 2012, which was completely ignored by all authorities. Lord Maginnis has been updated more than once but declines to now acknowledge this case in any way.
Pls. see the comments below re: Maginnis.
A deal was offered to P whereby if he pled "guilty" he would be released. Peter declined - it will take more than keeping him in jail to shut him up, it is said.
Due to P's move to HMP Holme House, due to the [postponed] trial, communications are disrupted getting to him. His address is now, but unknown for how much longer, is: P. Hofschroer, A3324DJ, 3-A-1-11, HMP Holme House, Holme House Rd., Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 2QU.
Peter thanks his supporters for their continuing support.
The main site is .

JANUARY 16 2016 Visiter No.626118 to
Anna von Reitz
Why Unrest of Any Kind Defeats Both Versions of America
There has been a lot of inappropriate talk about "civil war" in America. Let's be perfectly blunt.
The Federal United States has been operated as a puppet by the British Government which in turn has been operated as a puppet by the City State of Westminster aka Inner City of London which has been operated by international banking cartels and the Bar for generations. In turn, these organizations have been influenced, led, and perpetuated by what Frank O'Collins calls "the Roman Cult" within the Roman Catholic Church.
Americans, like the British People, have gone along trustingly and been abused and enslaved.
We, Americans, have been used repeatedly as the "muscle" behind wars for profit and illegal and immoral police actions in other countries undertaken by the British Crown Corporation and its cronies throughout the world, with the result that we are widely blamed and despised as the perpetrators of all this greed and violence when in fact we have been victims like everyone else and have merely been more gullible than the rest of the world.
A careful reading of the historical documents, especially the treaties ending the Revolutionary War and The Constitution, reveals that the British retained control of a substantial portion of the American jurisdiction of the sea including our ability to conclude international treaties and commercial trade agreements---both of which have been crippled and controlled since the birth of our nation by this arrangement.
In exchange for our Forefather's agreement to this deplorably bad deal, the British Monarch was made our Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. It was thought that his clear obligation to the Americans in this capacity would bind his hands and prevent him from doing us harm. In 1794 a treaty between the Americans and the City State of Westminster was also concluded in which we were promised "perpetual" friendship and amity.
We definitely need to remind them of the meaning of "perpetual".
So here we are at the beginning of the twenty-first century and our Trustees have proven to be our worst enemies--- not only our worst enemies, but worst enemies of all freedom-loving and decent people everywhere. Since 1866 the British Government has privately promoted and perpetuated a policy of eternal war and enslavement of the world's population while keeping up an appearance of being the bulwark and defender of western civilization. Like a pedophile acting as a Foster Parent, the British Government has spared no expense in its efforts to cover up its dirty work, but it is at last discovered.
The Federal United States is and has always been an instrumentality of the British Government and the international banks and the Bar Associations and it is the Federal United States---not the Continental United States--- which has been guilty of all the crimes against humanity which have been racked up and placed at the door of the hapless Americans who have been deceived into believing that the Federal United States is or ever was their lawful government.
Time to wake up. We have been hosts for these parasites and now they are moving on to attempt to parasitize China and its vast population.
The so-called "Federal Government" is a foreign corporation under contract to provide our States with nineteen enumerated services directed by our Trustee the British Monarch and his corporate Executive Officer known as the "President of the United States". The British Monarch was paid for this "service" with tribute in the form of mineral wealth extracted from the American States and was faithfully paid for involving us in an endless stream of unjust police actions and dirty commercial deals and then handing us the blame and the bills.
Let it stand before the American People and the entire world who the guilty parties actually are: the administration of Queen Elizabeth II, her corporation, ELIZABETH II, the British Crown Corporation and its franchises worldwide, the Lords of the Admiralty and the City-State of Westminister together with all its Successor Organizations and franchises, and the Holy See doing business as FRANCISCUS are directly and personally responsible for all this injustice and mayhem and mis-administration of the Public Trust in Britain, America, the Commonwealth, India, Japan, all of Western Europe and most of Eastern Europe, too.
The populations of all these countries have a grudge and many, many claims against these perpetrators; the People of China would be well-warned and advised not to accept any "gifts" from Jacob Rothshild or the World Bank or QEII, either. Gold and silver are not food, not fuel, and not the raw resources that China needs. Apart from being excellent conductors of electricity and photo emulsions, of what use are these so-called "precious" commodities?
Time to wake up.
We have all been bamboozled by these phonies (as in Phoenicians) long enough.
The bankers and lawyers who have acted as the foot soldiers of this global Evil Empire have planned various scenarios for the demise of America. First of all, we are to be blamed for all their sins. Second of all, we are to be charged with all their crimes. Third, we are to be stripped of whatever wealth we still have after they have stolen as much as they can possibly steal to pay their debts.
From their standpoint, it would be expedient to foment a civil war on our soil. There are a number of reasons.
First, it kills off their lawful Creditors, the American People. They are now claiming in the United Nations that we no longer exist and that the heirs of their Creditors are "absent" or "unknown". This pathetic excuse is being offered as a means of avoiding paying back the American People for gold illegally confiscated in the 1930's and labor and resources exchanged for no payment but hot air and paper ever since.
Second, murder of the American People allows them to collect on life insurance policies that they have gratuitously established on each and every one of us, naming themselves and their corporations as the beneficiaries.
Third, murder of the American People leaves an opportunity for them and their buddies to claim the "abandoned property" just as they did in Germany after the War.
They call this "plowing the field"---- emptying the land of its people and decrepit buildings and infrastructure so that it can be rebuilt under new ownership: theirs.
However, they have to have a plausible reason for attacking the American People, because after all they are under public contract to protect us and are continuing to siphon off large payments from our public treasuries for the service. They therefore have to find some sneaky, backdoor means to excuse their actions --- and their continuing crimes against us.
It is time to recognize these criminals for who and what they are and to bring a stop to them and their predations upon the entire world. The most expedient way to do this is for everyone worldwide to cease operating as any form of corporation---simply dissolve them all, nationalize their assets in the case of "government" corporations, demand that the Pope acting as CEO liquidate those corporations that have acted as criminal syndicates----including the major banks. Apply the Icelandic Answer.
Everyone please note that although these vermin have been misrepresenting the American People to the rest of the world for the past 150 years and mischaracterizing us at home, they are NOT the American People owed the land jurisdiction of the United States and never have been. The mis-administration and usurpation of our government that has been accomplished via semantic deceit and other forms of fraud, but that, too, has been discovered and is at an end.
If those responsible for this egregious behavior have any hope of surviving themselves, they must make amends to the rest of the planet and the people they have harmed.
In the case of the Federal United States the turning of the worm leaves one thing very clear: any attacks against the unarmed and peaceful American People to whom they owe "good faith service" will be instantly recognized as crimes of war and aggression by commercial mercenaries disguised as units of government.
Any failure to correct the political status of Americans to reflect their actual political status as "free sovereign and independent people of the United States" --- that is, the Continental United States--- like any attempt to mischaracterize their Creditors and the Heirs of their Creditors will also be recognized for what it is and rebutted.
Any failure of the British Monarch and the "President of the United States" to repay all the debt of the Federal United States that is lawfully owed to the innocent American People of the Continental United States will be obvious self-interest and default upon debt in the full view of all other nations.
When all those other peoples and nations have been afforded a full view of what has gone on here and stop to consider how they, too, have been abused, lied about, defrauded, and enslaved by these Babylonian Snake Oil Salesmen in tweeds, they will conclude as we have that we have all suffered from a single malady which has its world headquarters in the Inner City of London. And then we can all take appropriate action---like enforcement of the $279 trillion dollar International Commercial Obligation Lien which the Americans have placed against the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association and the misnamed Department of Justice which matures tomorrow.
The people of the Earth must unite against the evils perpetuated by the inhabitants of "the World"---a fake, illusory Satanic construct incorporated legal fictions--- that is, lies--- which serves only to mask the identities and obscure the filthy and violent intentions of profoundly evil men masquerading as philanthropists and pillars of the global community instead.
To all men and women everywhere the alarm goes forth and the claim in equity is clearly stated. This is our Earth. It belongs to us, not to any corporation. This, the American Government, as opposed to the "US Government" is a lawful and peaceful government "of the people, by the people and for the people"---- not a government "of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation".
If we, the people of the Continental United States are forced to take up arms against those operating the Federal United States, it will be a clarion call for your joint understanding and assistance in removing this source of criminality from our mutual midst. Let the Federal United States and the Governments of Britain and the City-State of Westminster and the administration of the Vatican stand revealed as crime syndicates that have created and which are responsible for much of the poverty, misery, injustice, and conflict that have infested our planet for generations----and not as they would portray themselves as enlightened philanthropists.
Petty crooks operating on a giant stage is much closer to the truth of it.
As each person reads this and knows that we can choose global peace or global war and that it is not negotiable that innocent victims should again bear the brunt of this criminality, don't be afraid just because you are suddenlyaware that you are "just one person" in the midst of a universe. Become aware instead that you are the universe.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Alaska State Superior Court

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626088 to

A Court Application made 6 months ago on the 31st July 2015 here of 200 pages condensed by request to 6 pages (here) to remove the restriction placed on the land registry has still not been completed ... full title here.
My mothers assets, having had theft, fraud & maladministration inflicted upon them by the OPG and then, further persecution into exile from the UK STATE Terrorism, she just wants to sell her home to live in peace from the UK government via bent judiciary that continue to steal her assets claiming her incapacity, when she HAS capacity, and if in any doubt carries her living will - EXECUTOR that is now invoked that secures her future but still the MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE carries on unabated.
Mum, disabled and 75 has suffered tremendously by the COURTs actions causing HARM, LOSS & INJURY with TRESPASS being also committed upon her property and her human rights that requires RESTORATION. IT really beggars belief what these people are getting away with alongside a catalogue of other victims taboo that we are aware of & may GOD help those we are unaware of.
Intentionally the courts are providing a slow and uncomfortable death for mum by denying her what is clearly HERS and not theirs, nor anyone else's. THE money awarded was for her care and comfort NOT for FAT CAT LAWYERS JUDGES and other huge fees to prove her capacity. IT really is a complete disgusting mess to read what these people are capable of in this day and age. I fear for my own old age as I do for others if things are allowed to continue as they do.. what a way to end your retirement days fighting to get restoration of your own assets property money and human rights.. this country of the UNITED KINGDOM is a joke and this is not a one man band campaign, there are thousands.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626085 to

With Uk Column Brian Gerrish Guy Taylor and JOHN HURST.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626083 to
Leonard Lawrence Pilot - COP CASE & THE

COURT ORDER Mr Justice Adrian Fulford, Queens Bench Division.
Leonard Lawrence not to disclosed to any judge details of the abuse he suffered whilst under the guardianship of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.

Lord Justice Adrian Fulford
High Court judge and the child sex ring: Adviser to Queen was founder of paedophile support group to keep offenders out of jail
Lord Justice Fulford was named last year as an adviser to the Queen
He was a key backer of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange
Police suspect the group of abusing children on an 'industrial scale'
He is revealed as a founder member of campaign to defend PIE
At the time it was calling for the age of consent to be lowered to just four
By Martin Beckford for The Mail on Sunday
Published: 22:02, 8 March 2014 | Updated: 16:52, 22 January 2015
Read more:…/High-court-judge-child-sex-rin…
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
The report exonerating Lord Justice Fulford should be published Joshua Rozenberg
Why shouldn't that be published? Why should we have to rely on a summary? Why are we not told what Fulford said in response to the allegations against him?
To protect Fulford's privacy? To spare his blushes? Where they regard it as necessary, judges invade people's personal privacy in their published rulings every day of the week. It's called open justice.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626081 to
Ode to Sheriff Mack -- How to Get Enforcement of the Law of the Land?
People all over this country are complaining about "lack of enforcement" of the basic Organic and Public Laws. I hate to break it to you, but you all have to take action in your own behalf to provide enforcement. You are "self-governing"--- remember?
The rats--- for profit governmental services corporations run by banks-- have usurped upon your lawful jurisdiction and set up incorporated "Counties" and incorporated "States". As soon as you incorporate anything, it is removed from the jurisdiction of the land and taken out from under the Law of the Land (including the Constitution) and moved to the international jurisdiction of the sea and the Law of the Sea.
As a result, you no longer have Sheriffs operating under the Law of the Land and you no longer have enforcement of the Organic and Public Laws. What you have are men in "similarly named" private corporate offices---Mall Cops and commercial mercenaries-- who are charged with enforcement of "codes, regulations, and statutes" that apply only to the franchises and employees and officers of their respective (and often different) corporations.
Throughout much of America, nobody is being paid to mind the store or provide enforcement of the Organic and Public Laws anymore. So, now does it make sense why you have no access to the guarantees of The Constitution and no enforcement for the indictments of Common Law Grand Juries?
To get action and enforcement you have to have a Common Law Sheriff operating the land jurisdiction of your county, and you also need an entire Common Law Court backing him up.
There are basically three possibilities---
1. Cause enough ruckus so your county votes to dissolve the "County" corporation and operate in its correct jurisdiction---- this is unlikely because they will want to cling to the "federal funding" --- i.e., kick-backs from the fraud.
2. Convince the "Sheriff" of Your County as in "Sheriff of Jackson County" to also accept the duty of Jackson County Sheriff (the Sheriff on the Land position) and also enforce the Organic and Public Laws ---- wear both the "incorporated" and the "unincorporated" hats. That has been done and it has been proven to be correct by the Mack/Printz v. USA case in the US Supreme Court. It used to be taken for granted that the Sheriff occupied both the private corporate "law enforcement" office and the Public Office, but nowadays they are too bedraggled and dumbed-down to know the difference, and since the incorporated "Counties" want a free wheel to plunder and do what they like, far too many "Sheriffs" have gone along and taken orders and failed to serve the Public Office or enforce the Organic and Public Law.
Sheriff Richard Mack and Joe Arpaio are examples of men who have honorably worn both hats.
3. Do an end-run around the incorporated County. Just write them off as foreign "code enforcers" who are there to police foreign corporations and Federal United States Citizens and make sure that is all they do, too. Meantime, marshal up the living people of your county via a Public Notice of a Public Meeting to form an unincorporated body politic---- a free association of landowners---- sign and witness your Declaration of Political Status reclaiming your birthright estate and political status established on the land jurisdiction of your native state--- and begin educating people. Explain that our hired help--- the "federal corporation" and its employees--- defrauded us back in 1933 and that a second such corporation is now attempting to do the same thing. Explain that as a result of this chicanery their political status as been changed to that of a British Crown Subject and that the Public Offices their county is owed have all been converted to private corporate offices instead---- leaving the Public Offices vacated since 1976. As a result we have no real Sheriff operating the land jurisdiction of the County and enforcing the Organic and Public Laws--- The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Incorporation, The Constitution for the united States of America, The Northwest Ordinance, and United States Statutes-at-Large. They have to elect from among themselves a whole different slate of candidates to fill the actual Public Offices. Once those people are elected, bonded, and sworn in, your Sheriff will have a complete American Common Law Court to back him up and he will have the sweeping enforcement powers he is owed as the top peacekeeping officer of the land. He will be able to deputize as many men as he needs to enforce the Organic and Public Law--- just like John Wayne in the old movies.

JANUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.626072 to

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626060 to
READ about it here
Seems to me Jones and Lush have defrauded heirs under the intestacy rules

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626055 to

This is why there is clear evidence to show that in the COURT OF PROTECTION there is an obvious denial/refusal of funds issued to patients to get representation or to investigate their own victomisation from these CRIMINALS, in which we have had the same experiences SHOWING without doubt a CONFLICT of INTEREST for the BAR to be involved in the PROBATE MIS-MANAGEMENT of a persons estate who is ALIVE.
TO the trained eye of course, this is all too obvious, THIS IS how the CRIME works so well for the COP/OPG. NO ACCOUNTABILITY???
AND the justice system wonders WHY there is an increase in COMMERCIAL LIENS??
TAKE AWAY justice from the MASSES and you are inviting a WAR!

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626053 to

JANUARY 14 2016 Visiter No.626051 to
31 pages in total to Hogan Howe they were signed for by his office yesterday by Terry at 8-19am on the 12th January 2016. I included copies of emails to Hogan Howe in which he was requested to arrest Conmeran-Osbourn-Burley and others.
He has signed yet again for documents of proof that can't be argued against, i have stated and named several judges who i believe were ordered to get rid of my cases against a certain bank.
I have shown him by documentation i have that he deliberately destroyed evidence signed for by his office in 2009. City of Westinster Magistrates court blatantly refuse to reply to letters sent to its court manager and staff asking why my case was given no court reference number neither was it given a case number. On my phoning this court i was informed "NO JUDGMENT RECORDED OF DJ WICKHAM AND YOUR REQUEST FOR ARREST WARRANTS TO BE SERVED ON CEOs OF THE BRADFORD AND BINGLEY BANK, ITS HEAD OF LEGAL SERVICES P. JORDAN, CHIEF CONSTABLES SIMS AND SWIFT, LASTLY ALISTAIR DARLING EX MINISTER".
Liz Homer ex CEO of HM Customs failed to respond to documents she was sent re mass fraud. I see she waited until she received her title and has now resigned.
Hogan-Howe has received letters and documents that i sent and received from MPs.
Now we go after the CPS again for their false letters to me, yet another CEO Sharmer of the CPS knighted and resigned from the CPS.
9 days passed and no acknowledgment from Carney CEO of the Bank of England. I'm told Conmeran is in a flap.
Personally they should jail every one of these scum and throw away the keys. Cameron has aided and abetted the Bradford and Bingley to blatantly steal from its borrowers. BASTARDS ALL.
Get snouts out the trough party. At least we do tell the truth.

JANUARY 13 2016 Visiter No.626030 to

Dear MP Gordon Marsden
I frequently catch up on the marvellous work that you do.
HOWEVER, I have asked repeatedly about a RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION.
Can you please respond.
CONSIDERING you are of the same cloth ie 'GAY'
Something that we do have in common, one might expect a little more sympathy to our cause.
Also, the fact that my disabled mum of 75 years is having to endure such trauma regarding the resulting losses to her estate from the ongoing Court of Protection state mal administration, theft ,fraud and NOW persecution into exile, appears too, to have little effect on the effort being put into a resolution.
You once warned against criticising the Judiciary for corruption and if you are aware of such dangers you clearly know more and what they are capable of, to get away with.
The information I am gleaning from it, is that you too, fear that not conforming with the WILL of the judiciary, may also have an adverse effect on your own career.
Remember that your duty is to your constituents, not to corrupt entities, obviously running rife in our courts system.
Being duty bound, a public servant, I am clearly CALLING on those services with some URGENCY and further to this, the failing of which will be documented with our other allegations of MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE that are being collated on various PUBLIC SERVANTS, misconducts that in your case I still have on file of emails being ignored etc
It is now, where we need you to stand out and sit clearly on one side of the fence or the other?
So help me GOD, those whom are doing the LATTER I will expose.
Your competitor in the election PETER ANTHONY of the conservatives is a very close friend of mine of many many years and it is because of that friendship I really did wish him to win such is the desperation we find ourselves in with regard to help needed that am sure PETER would have assisted in the full capacity.
PIN your colours to the mast please MR MARSDEN because I now need to see them!!
Mike & Ann: Clarke
recorded delivery receipt attached 11/1/2016 LABOUR HEAD OFFICE

JANUARY 12 2016 Visiter No.626011 to

JANUARY 12 2016 Visiter No.626010 to
Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia

JANUARY 12 2016 Visiter No.626007 to

JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625980 to


JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625966 to
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs
Part 3 of Third Round with Karen Hudes
Ms. Hudes Has Also Been Putting Out Attack Pieces on the Internet--- Apparently Hoping That She Will Get Somewhere With Gossip She Can’t Go With Facts. Below is an example of the Hate Mail, with my response below:
KAREN: To: J W I have been warning people that Anna von Reitz is a disinformation agent for quite some time. As I stated a year ago, when discussing secret societies, "Anna Von Reitz is controlled opposition and works for the Vatican. Most of the people with good websites do. They are gathering information about who is most aware."
ANNA: Anyone who needs to know can ask and find out that I don’t own, operate, or have any kind of role whatsoever with any website except which is a simple numbered list of articles and blurbs and its donated by a fan who gets no money for what he is doing ----just like me.
That’s right, Karen. I get no salary from the Vatican and in fact have nothing to do with the Vatican. I agreed to help Pope Benedict XVI return American assets to the American People. But that’s not a job with the Vatican, nor with the Holy See. It’s not a job in the sense that you have a job with the World Bank or the “Global Debt Facility”. It’s a mission---one that I began a long, long time ago.
KAREN: With this I see that von Reitz is still evidently trying to unilaterally surrender US military might through a crash of the Federal Reserve Note, and turn US gold back to the Vatican General Dunford and the Joint Chiefs of Staff had nothing to say about my letter to General Dunford or the fact that the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF is restoring the US monetary gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility to US residents through minting the gold into the US Dollar 2 and that the Board of Governors has declared the United States to be in interregnum so that we can implement the Global Currency Reset. @KarenHudes 11h11 hours ago The Global Currency Reset is under implementation. Here is what my followers have to say: "Anna has very close ties to the Vatican, and that is a power base I do not have much trust in. "
ANNA: The United States you are talking about has no “military might” and never did have. Know why, Karen? Because the “United States, Inc.” is just a stinking corporation-- a name on a piece of paper, an implement of fraud, a Ponzi Scheme, a nasty, globe-sprawling criminal cartel that has done nothing but victimize and terrorize and plunder the American people and give us an undeserved bad name worldwide.
The military might of America comes from the people of America. Take the American Armed Forces away from the control of the bankrupted “United States, Inc.” and from any presumption that we are associated with those crooks, and the Truth emerges. The military might of the Federal United States is limited to the Puerto Rican Navy, the Home Guard on Guam, and similar meaninglessly small forces. That is the reality.
Our military might comes from the united States of America, the actual one. I know that might be hard for you to grasp, Karen, but it is guns and fists--- and those guns and fists have been used by a sick, rotten, corrupt corporate syndicate and its “leadership” to engage in wars for profit, racketeering, pollution of the environment, terrorizing and murdering civilians, and doing it all “in our names” while at the same time feeding us lies to make us go along with it. br> And we aren’t going along with it anymore.
Our military might doesn’t depend on us enslaving ourselves to a piece of paper or allowing crooks to steal our identity and charge up our credit to the moon or giving them a fixed rate of exchange that allows them to trade their worthless I.O.U.’s for our labor and resources. No, Karen, it doesn’t. Once you realize that the bankruptcy of the Federal Reserve doesn’t have a thing to do with us, and that we have the only actual money in the entire system, you can see that we are more than capable of repudiating their odious debt and their false claims that we are standing as their sureties. And going right straight on down the track using United States Silver Dollars.
We don’t need you or the “World Bank” or the “IBRD” or any of the central banks. Soon a worldwide currency backed simply by all the labor and all the natural resources of the world will be available and delivered via Block Chain technology. We will finally have absolutely no need for bankers whatsoever. They will have to find other ways to steal. The lawyers will no longer be in demand, either.
This Great Fraud has been the final straw.
KAREN: What Von Reizinger doesn't seem to realize is that WE HAVE OUTED THE DISINFO AGENTS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE CURRENCY SCAM. The real heroes in Harney County are the Hammonds, and they want nothing to do with the dupes and provocateurs.
ANNA: The Hammonds are trying to save the lives of innocent men. Pure and simple, they realize that life means more than money---- something that you and the World Bankers need to learn, too. So they are willing to give up and sacrifice themselves and the land they love to save the lives of others. It’s truly heroic on their parts, however misguided, because the Evil that threatens them also threatens the rest of us, and if we keep on letting cretins like you and your bosses get away with your “storyline” you will have us all believing that chains and whips and cotton fields are “freedom”.
KAREN: Here is what I tweeted the day before that about Santilli and the risk of provocateurs hijacking what was marketed as a "peaceful demonstration": U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken, who resentenced Dwight Hammond Jr. and his son Steven, is not presiding over a Court under Article III of the US Constitution.
ANNA: The Hammonds aren’t subject to the “US Constitution”, Karen. And they never were. Wake up and hear the birds sing.
The “US Constitution” is the Constitution of the United States, not The Constitution for the united States of America that the Hammonds are heir to.
US District Judge Ann Aiken was usurping upon our jurisdiction just like all the other US District Courts have been doing for years, and she’s going to pay for it with her pension and her job and her reputation. There’s a new United States Supreme Court ruling that proves the fraud and the lack of jurisdiction and the ugly, criminal, corrupt nature of the entire court system the banks have been running as their very own little private debt collection system.
Once the dim politicians understand that they either bust you or get busted, guess who is going to suffer, Karen?
KAREN: Under the Global Currency Reset, the people are going to put the 1789 Constitution back into effect and end martial law, using Article V of the Constitution. The Hammonds' sentence will be commuted asap. Other people who did not harm anyone and were falsely imprisoned in private jails which are nothing more than a modern day slavery system should also expect to get their freedom restored. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:11 AM, J W wrote:
ANNA: That’s a good joke, too. The only “Constitution” these fraud artists can touch is their own corporate charters, known as the “Constitution of the United States of America” and the “Constitution of the United States “ which they have violated into oblivion by all their criminal acts. And none of those “Constitutions” date back to 1789. They were first adopted in 1868 and 1888.
If the bankers and the lawyers even pretend to touch our Constitution, even try to foist off some kind of look-alike-sound-alike “Constitutional Convention” and attempt to pass this off as having anything whatsoever to do with us, our land, our labor, our property or anything else related to us---- it will be absolute glaring proof of intent to further defraud the American People and intent to damage our lawful Republic.
At that point, Karen, we are no longer talking ignorance and white collar crime and fines and pay back and proper administration. At that point, we are talking knowing, willful, pre-meditated fraud and treason.
If that happens, we will have grounds to prosecute the current office holders for capital offenses. Think about that. You will be sending your pals the crooked politicians to the gallows, and after they are done testifying, there will be a long waiting line of bankers and lawyers to follow.
The other nations who have been harmed and defrauded will happily help us clean house and track down the criminals responsible. There won’t be a safe house from here to Hell for any of those responsible.
Millions upon millions of average people, politicians, other bankers, other lawyers, now know what went on here. You aren’t going to win in any case, but if you keep on like this, you will certainly have a lot more to lose. Judge Anna

JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625970 to
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs
Part 2 of Third Round with Karen Hudes
This is what Karen published on the web and my replies tit for tat:
Karen: January 4, 2016 When time really matters, and the world has agreed to something that will liberate us from slavery for the first time, (and prevent WWIII, starvation, and possible mass annihilation) there are bound to be agents and spoilers. Here are two attempts to steal the world's gold from the world's people. The first puts an astronomic amount at the disposal of Anna von Reitz, who in her own words is "legal adviser to former Pope Benedict XVI and now Pope Francis".…/…/03/call-to-duty/
Anna: I and approximately 900 other Americans brought complaint for Breach of Trust before Benedict XVI in his capacity as the Global Estate Trustee. The advice I gave him was to give American property back to Americans. He agreed and asked for help doing that. Here I am. Karen would rather pretend that I am an “Agent of the Vatican” than a Claimant against both the Vatican and the British Monarch but the facts and the recorded documents tell the tale as do my words and my work. You shall know them by their fruits. So far Ms. Hudes has come up with no less than five filthy devious schemes to avoid returning American Assets to Americans. She has consistently sought to get immunity for her bosses and profit for the colluding banks instead of justice for the people.
Ms. Hudes is constantly making these absurd statements to the effect that she and her efforts are preventing World War III. Ms. Hudes can’t even stand up and answer my questions or come up with an honest plan to return American assets. Good men and women worldwide are preventing World War III by looking around the corners, realizing that they have been duped, realizing that they are dealing with criminals in High Places, and that war crimes and fraud and breaches of trust have been perpetuated upon the Americans, Canadians, Brits, Aussies, and most of western Europe by a small cadre of colluding international banking interests.
Karen: The second attempt is even worse. I said I did not want to debate Ms. Reitz again because she did not fight fair and square, but kept on putting words in my mouth. So what did she do? She made me respond by filing a claim against the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF.
Anna: Ms. Hudes has no leg to stand on for her actions. That becomes very obvious when I question her, so she runs.
Karen: The other thing she did was to try and prevent the US from ending a secret military rule and returning to its Constitution of 1789.
Anna: What was that “Secret Military Rule”? The Lieber Code, created and imposed upon the Grand Army of the Republic by Abraham Lincoln in 1863, which made the Army responsible for safeguarding our money. Obviously, the politicians either duped or colluded with military brass and the Army failed that mission on an epic scale.
The truth of the matter is that Abraham Lincoln was only empowered to serve as “President” of a Joint Stock Trading Company doing business as the “United States”. He never held any office related to the actual organic states of the Union doing business as the united States of America. He worked for the Federal United States, which is a different bird entirely from the Continental United States.
Our Constitution was created and sealed in 1787. Their Constitution was created and sealed in 1789.
Our Constitution affects the united States of America. Their Constitution affects the United States.
Our States of America hold the patent to all land assets and also retained considerable non-delegated powers in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
Their United States is under contract to provide us with nineteen enumerated services. They are supposed to be our Trustees representing and protecting American interests on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. Their failure to do so resulted in our complaint to the Pope. __________________________________________________________ As Her Answer to Our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien She Posted the Following--- Though Again No Actual Hard Copy Has Been Received and Our Response Again Appears Below:
Karen: The World Bank 1818 H Street N.W. (202) 473-1000 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Washington, D.C. 20433 Cable Address: INTBAFRAD INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION U.S.A. Cable Address: INDEVAS January 4, 2016 To Ms. Anna von Reitz 2366 Sopark Road, Big Lake, Alaska (99652) and c/o Post Office Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska (99652) To Mr. James Clinton Belcher, by general notice:
Anna: Hahahahah! What is a “general notice” Ms. Hudes? Where did you go to Law School? Or was that a “law” school?
Karen: This refers to the purported Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien to World Bank/IBRD/IMF, issued on January 4, 2016 with respect to "assets on deposit in the Global Debt Facility." Please be advised: 1. This is not a "Final Notice of Obligation Lien" as there was no previous opportunity to refute the statements contained therein.
Anna What kind of a joke is this, Karen? You know the rules. You have to answer and rebut our facts item by item, point by point. To refresh your memory, the item to be rebutted is:
(1) The World Bank/IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the 1933 Bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated. And you haven’t done so. Yes or no, Karen? You must challenge our statement of fact with proof otherwise or admit it. We take it that you agree that the World Bank/IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the infamous 1933 Bankruptcy; you might as well, as Federal Titles 5 and 12 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934 would reduce you to a laughingstock if you didn’t admit it.
As for your assertion that our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien is “not a “Final Notice” because there was no previous opportunity to refute the statements contained therein”---- au contraire, Karen. Many dozens of opportunities were provided to the World Bank, IBRD, and IMF franchises via U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested between 2010 and 2014 under “Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents”. Due Process was provided at each step. On February
3, 2014 Final Notice of Commercial and Administrative Default was served on the STATE OF ALASKA, which is a franchise of the UNITED STATES, INC. which is a doing business name of the IMF which is an agency of the UN Corporation which is operated by the World Bank. Final Judgment and Civil Orders were issued on April 11, 2014. On July 4, 2014, the entire matter was published as a book, Disclosure 101, available on and “general notice” was provided to millions of people worldwide. Since then, we have published UCC-1 Financing Statements in favor of the States of America against the Principals of the World Bank, and have also published Public Liens related to the same. You need to look at page 169 of our published sworn affidavit of probable cause, entitled You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause, which is also available on, and which has been read by millions of people. Our “Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien” is exactly what it says it is, and your ten (10) days plus three (3) days mailing time are running.
KAREN: 2. Ms. Anna von Reitz and Mr. James Clinton Belcher do not represent any persons other than themselves.
ANNA: Fortunately, we are Beneficiaries and Heirs to the Assets, acknowledged heirs to the Priority Creditors of the 1933 Bankruptcy (that is, the living people that the World Bank, IBRD, and Federal Reserve defrauded, stole from, and never repaid), each of us is one of “the free sovereign and independent people of the United States” per Article III of the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, and not as you would mischaracterize us, an “inhabitant” subject to the British Crown. We are also organic states of the Union within organic nation states, who have delegated a share of our sovereignty to the unincorporated united States of America. Thanks to the Equal Protection requirements of our Organic Law, so are the better part of 390 million other Americans whose nativity occurred on dry land. Our Public Law also makes it clear that we (and they) can never be considered as Dual Citizens and cannot become United States Citizens absent performance of the duties established by 2 United States Statute-at-Large 153. As a result, Karen, as long as there is an American alive anywhere in the world whose nativity occurred on the land of one of the organic states, there is a live claim in probate against the World Bank, IBRD, and IMF; thanks to our published Irrevocable Will every such man and woman has equal interest in our claim. We---combined--- all those who are the heirs of parents and grandparents who suffered as a result of the 1933 Bankruptcy, are the only people who have standing in this matter by nature and birthright. We stand on the land, Ms. Hudes, claiming criminal Breach of Trust, Fraud, Unlawful Conversion, Reverse Trust Fraud, Conspiracy, and numerous other crimes against the British Monarch, the Federal United States, the banks you work for and the American Bar Association you belong to.
Recently, attempts were made by the scum at Wells Fargo (a securities corporation using a bank’s trademarked name to deceive and defraud people, owned by the “U.S. Attorney General”) to claim that we no longer exist as a nation. They said that we no longer had any international representation, that we no longer have a national currency in circulation, that we have “abandoned” our land and that the “unknown heirs” could not be found.
It’s the same kind of story that your bosses at the World Bank peddled when they received our assets as Secondary Creditors, knowing full-well who the actual Priority Creditors were and who their heirs are, and precisely where we live, too. It may make you feel warm and fuzzy to know that there are plenty of people who remember FDR’s gold confiscations very clearly as Witnesses having first-hand knowledge. We have their sworn testimony. On November 6, 2016, we issued a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty together with the “federal” Indigenous Nations precluding any claim that the States of America are not represented internationally. According to the Last Man Standing Rule governing both Treaties and Contracts, as long as there is a single competent “federal government” entity and a single competent delegate of the States of America holding up their respective jurisdictions The Constitution for the united States of America is as sound today as it was in 1787.
The United Nations Security Council and Secretary General Ki-Ban Moon and numerous other “World” officials have been duly served and notified of our action. As a result, the Native Nations have regained their standing on the land, and we have provided for designation of new “federal government” contractors to administer the nineteen enumerated services we are owed. The bankrupt District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and the UNITED STATES, INC. have nothing to do with us and we have nothing to do with them. If the banks didn’t make and keep enough money for themselves to pay their own debts after plundering and defrauding us for a hundred years, it’s their own problem. We are not standing as sureties for them and we are not allowing any hypothecation of debt against our assets and we are not buying or backing any private fiat script.
KAREN: 3. As provided in paragraph 6 of the Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement dated 11th August 1950, only assignees of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos, the mandate legal counsel and asset manager of Code TVM-LSM-666, who have been duly authenticated by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF possess capacity to move or remove after maturity in the year 2005 the assets on deposit in the Global Debt Facility.
ANNA: Probate of estates is never truly closed and is not “close-able” by anyone, Ms. Hudes, whether they are the estates of people or the estates of nations. The World Bank which has functioned as a knowing predator upon us has netted itself the uncomfortable position of serving as our Trustee in this matter and the whole world is staring up its skirt. Those who have “represented” the States of America since 1860 have been knowingly or unknowingly acting in gross Breach of Trust and under conditions of semantic deceit and fraud, both with respect to the American People and with respect to their dealings with other people abroad. We cannot speak to the intentions or the knowledge possessed by people like Douglas McArthur, Eisenhower, or Kennedy. What we can tell you is that with respect to us any action they took was and is null and void for lack of delegated authority and fraud.
KAREN: 4. Ms. Anna von Reitz and Mr. James Clinton Belcher have no standing to challenge the decision of the Board of Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund on the Global Currency Reset by virtue of Article VII of the Articles of Agreement of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Article IX of the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (See…/IBRD_Articles_of_Agree…. pdf )
ANNA: See above. The heirs and entitlement holders of an estate always have the right to challenge any disbursement or disposal of estate assets. Your bosses are in exactly the same position as the owners of a Pawn Shop caught in possession of stolen goods, and like it or not, the whole world knows it. Most tellingly, Karen, you haven’t denied it, either.
KAREN: 5. The United States is in interregnum, pending the reentry of its Constitution of 1789 into effect under Article V thereof. The monetary gold reserves of the United States are being deployed in the Global Currency Reset into United States Dollars in replacement of Federal Reserve Notes and for no other purpose and to no other person. The Global Currency Reset is agreed to among the nations, and every attempt to disrupt or block the Global Currency Reset is doomed to ignominy and failure.
ANNA: You have just reiterated our points for us, Karen. The United States (Inc.) is in “interregnum”--- that is, receivership---and facing another round of “reconstruction”. But the United States you are talking about is NOT the same as the United States of America, nor the same as The United States of America, and none of those entities are the same as the united States of America----which just happens to be the actual landlord.
The United States (Inc.) you are talking about is nothing but a private, mostly foreign-owned “governmental services corporation” and the landlord couldn’t give a fig if the cleaning help is in trouble financially, nor do we care if that same cleaning help is in trouble for committing fraud, identity theft, racketeering, unlawful conversion, and hosts of other crimes.
The States of America have been infamously mistreated by servants under contract to provide them with “Good Faith Service”. The “United States” we are part of are quite different from all the dopplegangers that a gang of thieves operated by the British Crown have created to cause confusion, practice deceit, and defraud people, but the jig is up.
The Great Fraud is over, and you had all better believe it and take it to heart. Your only safety lies in pretending cow-like ignorance, which shouldn’t be too hard to do.
It does not serve the interests of the people of the united States of America to use our assets of any kind--- not our labor, not our natural resources – as collateral backing any private bank script whether it is called a “Federal Reserve Note” or a “United States Note”. Nor are we under any obligation to accept any such arrangement.
We have appointed General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. in his capacity as a Commanding General of the American Armed Forces to act as our Fiduciary Deputy in this matter and have instructed him to receive and secure the gold and other assets that the Americans are owed to be used as collateral backing our own United States Silver Dollar defined as one ounce of fine silver. It is our stated intention to be able to interface with the BRICS Alliance while maintaining our own traditional precious metals currency.
The Trustees appointed by the Creditors of the United States, Inc., must be made aware of the fact that we are NOT standing as sureties for the debts of the United States, Inc. and will not honor any fixed exchange rate of any successor organization’s worthless paper for our labor or natural resources.
KAREN: 6. The statute of limitations invalidates any and all claims on the assets deposited in the Global Debt Facility. This procedure was agreed among all the nations in trust as inviolate and in sacred memory of the sacrifice that preceded this agreement. In disrespect of their predecessors and the Board of Governors' duty for the benefit of all of humanity, Ms. Anna von Reitz and Mr. James Clinton Belcher have the temerity, without meeting any burden of proof in showing the origin of the gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility, to insist that any one country, or peoples, should stand above the rest, and thereby plunge the entire humanity in another Dark Ages. For the foregoing reasons, the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF declare the purported Final Notice of Obligation Lien to be null and void.
ANNA: Ms. Hudes--- there is no statute of limitation on the crime of fraud, and the united States of America along with the countries making up the British Isles, Canada, Australia, Japan, Greece, India, and most of Western and Eastern Europe have all been defrauded by your employers and other collaborating and colluding banks, banking associations, and banking cartels. So much for any of them declaring anything whatsoever about “Law” nor the validity of our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien.
Speaking of which, Item 1 of our Lien remains unanswered. So do Items 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Unless I get serious answers and factual rebuttals in my hand no later than the close of business on January 17, 2016, every jot of our Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien to World Bank/IBRD/IMF stands as Truth in International Law.
Finally, I want to address a couple other points, Ms. Hudes. You seem intent on painting us and the people of the united States of America as the greedy Bad Guys, when in fact you are working for the greedy Bad Guys and you are all part of a “System”---that is, criminal racket has that defrauded and abused everyone on the planet except for bankers and lawyers and their employee, cronies, and sycophants.
The Americans are only seeking the return of property that was stolen from their parents and grandparents, just as anyone on Earth would do. It is a just claim made by people who have been outrageously harmed and defrauded by sanctimonious con artists in nice suits.
But that day is done and the fraud is on the table. I am rubbing your nose in it, right now, and if you can’t smell the roses from where you are sitting, just put on your glasses and get closer to the page.
KAREN: Sincerely, Karen Hudes Acting General Counsel International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Overseer Mandate Trustee, Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666

JANUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.625965 to
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Part 1 of Third Round with Karen Hudes
Today, I wrote a reply to numerous attacks from Karen Hudes. I want you all to see for yourselves how the facts lie. As most who have been following this, Karen Hudes took off running when I started asking her hard questions, so I decided to ask her bosses the hard questions. Here's what we sent to them on January 4th:
Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien to World Bank/IBRD/IMF
Issued January 4, 2016 to:
Board of Governors, World Bank/IBRD and IMF
Board of Directors, World Bank/IBRD and IMF
1818 H Street NW
Washington, DC 20433
Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested # 7006 0810 0003 3541 5106
Be it known to one and all, both living and dead: Karen Hudes is proposing that our gold be used to pay off the debts represented by Federal Reserve Notes--- that is, that we should pay for the odious debts of those who have defrauded us. This is to our knowledge the fifth such scheme Ms. Hudes has proposed. We living beneficiaries of the assets on deposit with the World Bank/IBRD and with the International Monetary Fund/IMF owed to the States of America and the free sovereign and independent people of the United States who also have beneficial interest as donors with respect to assets secondarily on deposit with the “Global Debt Facility” administered by the World Bank Board of Governors depose the following to be Material Fact established by Public Record:
(1) The World Bank/IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the 1933 Bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated;
(2) Upon settlement of the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated, the World Bank/IBRD knowingly received gold and other assets belonging to the Priority Creditors--- who are and who have always been the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” and their unincorporated States of America;
(3) The gold reserves contained in the Global Debt Facility and other accounts administered by the World Bank/IBRD and International Monetary Fund/IMF known as the “Infinity Accounts” were obtained at least in part as a result of illegal confiscations of privately held gold carried out by the Administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, promoted under inequitable exchange, duress and indemnity, followed by identity theft, falsification of political status records, and reverse trust and fiduciary trust fraud;
(4) The American gold and other assets such as credit and titles to land together with reasonable interest is owed as an inheritance to the living American people and their unincorporated organic states from which the gold was obtained;
(5) Ms. Karen Hudes has been informed that there is no Constitutional authority allowing for any officials or agents of the Federal United States --including Federal State and Federal County Officials-- to receive assets in behalf of the living people and the unincorporated states; she has also been informed that there is no agreement on the part of the lawful beneficiaries allowing the World Bank/IBRD/IMF to use our gold to pay for, buy back, or otherwise collateralize Federal Reserve Notes, United States Notes, or any other private bank script;
The Board of Governors and Executive Directors have ten (10) days plus three days mailing time from the mailing date of this Final Notice to rebut the truth of the five (5) statements above, or they shall stand as Truth in Commerce and self-enforcing international law creating an effective and collectible commercial obligation lien against the Global Debt Facility, the World Bank/IBRD, and International Monetary Fund/ IMF for the assets valued at $370 billion United States Dollars and interest due, payable immediately in full, as well as establishing our collateral claim on the land assets of the Continental United States owed to the United Colonies and the States of America however these assets may now be represented, defined, en-titled or accounted and in the possession of the respective banks;
We have specifically directed Ms. Hudes that it is our Will to use our gold to back our own national currency, the actual United States Dollar, defined as one ounce of fine silver, and that General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., is hereby appointed to act as our Fiduciary Deputy in this matter and is uniquely enabled to receive the gold, titles, and other assets owed to the American people and is obligated to safely convey and secure these assets for our intended use by his receipt of them;
We note that the Federal United States and the UNITED STATES are in Commercial and Administrative Default with respect to us and our estates and we specifically give Notice to the Board of Governors and the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank/IBRD and to the International Monetary Fund/IMF of this fact. There can be no presumption against us nor against our organic united states nor our unincorporated States of America, no claim that we stand as sureties in behalf of any incorporated entity and no assumption of contract, and our receipt of any gold under this or any other distribution in no way removes, releases or impairs our claim to these or any other or additional assets or remedies we are owed;
We have been the victims of institutionalized fiduciary trust fraud and criminal Breach of Trust which must now be addressed. The Members of Congress who have voted themselves and their own plenary government a “dollar for dollar” fixed exchange rate for private bank notes, that is, Federal Reserve Notes --- I.O.U’s ---as pretended equitable exchange for our actual United States Dollars defined as one ounce of pure silver, have acted in breach of trust and contempt of the Constitution; their inequitable claims, acts, and debts stand null and void, ab initio, repudiated as odious debt accrued as the result of purposeful constructive fraud;
Any bank that continues to exchange “Federal Reserve Notes” for actual assets upon the presumption that the American people and the American states are standing as surety, or presumes that the American people are willingly engaged in this fraud, acts as an accomplice to gross constructive fraud and breach of trust imposed by monopoly inducement practiced against the innocent American people and their organic states on the land. Any court or international organization extending bankruptcy protection to the Federal Reserve is similarly supporting and participating in this same fraud;
A Declaration of Joint Sovereignty has been issued by the States of America and Indigenous Tribal Governments of the Native American Nations and addressed to the United Nations, together with updated Sovereign Letters Patent. More than 500 million United States Silver Dollars remain in circulation, all fifty (50) unincorporated States of America are in operation, an estimated 360 million Americans claim their lawful birthright political status as organic states of the union and free sovereign and independent people of the United States; they are all beneficiaries and heirs and are owed their complete inheritance plus return of all donations held in trust, free and clear of any debt, lien, encumbrance or presumption of contract or presumption of debt assumption. Any claim that the free sovereign and independent people of the United States are “stateless” is unconscionable and this Notice of the fact has been served;
This Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien is issued upon this Fourth Day of January in the year 2016 for the causes enumerated by the living heirs and beneficiaries known as Anna Maria Riezinger and James Clinton Belcher from without the United States, without representation, claiming their natural political status as free sovereign and independent people of the United States and as organic states of the union having reached the age of majority, being of sound mind and body, not indigent, not bankrupt, not penniless, not needy, and by no other means nor manner incapacitated, limited, obligated or under duress of any kind; we direct the trustees of the World Bank/IBRD and International Monetary Fund/IMF to immediately settle and balance all accounts and return all American gold and collateral assets owed to the American people upon release to General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., upon his acceptance of it as our appointed Fiduciary Deputy, for use as collateral backing our actual money, the United States Silver Dollar, defined as one ounce of pure silver.
As natural heirs and beneficiaries we specifically forbid any misuse of our gold to benefit any foreign central bank or incorporated governmental services corporation and forbid the release of our gold to any organization or individual who does not owe us full duty as our specifically appointed Fiduciary Deputy obligated to act in our behalf and according to our instruction as a condition of his receipt of our assets. So we depose and say finally that Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents and Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals, whereupon we have set our Signatures and Seals as Witness to our Will in this matter: ______________________________seal_________________by Anna Maria Riezinger, beneficiary, one of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”, non-negotiable autograph, all rights reserved. ______________________________seal_________________by James Clinton Belcher, beneficiary, one of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”, non-negotiable autograph, all rights reserved. cc: General Joseph F.Dunford, Jr.
John Forbes Kerry, Secretary of State
Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations

JANUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.625959 to
The trials and tribulations that many people accused of “criminal offenses” are a direct result of not understanding the nature and cause of the accusation. The end result of this lack of knowledge and understanding is that the United States and the States have the largest prison population in the world and execute the most people. Lives and families are destroyed. Family farms are stolen by unscrupulous judges and attorneys. Hard-working folks who have done no wrong have lost their homes and savings and have been reduced to a state of poverty by an encounter with the American system of injustice. The horror stories are limitless. This author believes that this lack of understanding is the result of the “dumbing down of America,” a part of a scheme devised and orchestrated by foreign and domestic enemies of the people of the United States of America, not the least of which are the American Bar Association and the various State Bar Associations which sprang from England. These Bar Associations have concocted a Luciferian scheme bringing the maritime jurisdiction onto the land and the scheme undoubtedly includes every member of every bar association up to the dishonorable justices of the Supreme Court. These foreign and domestic enemies of the people of the united States of America are believed by many, including the author, to have schemed for years, at least since the founding of our nation, to establish a total takeover of not only our country, but the entire planet and to enslave the people in their demonic quest to establish a One World Government or “New World Order” created out of the chaos of the destruction of Liberty and to be founded upon the ruins of the principles on which our once great nation was established and with the slave labor supplied by a once free, self sufficient and proud people
Yes, Virginia, there is a conspiracy. There is a conspiracy by attorneys to steal everything that you have and to make you a slave. The members of the bar have bestowed honors, privileges and immunities upon themselves in direct violation of the very constitutions that they have sworn an oath to uphold so they can steal with impunity. They have defecated on the principles of law and justice. This author has personally witnessed them laugh about their “license to steal” when referring to their membership in the bar. Lawyers have infiltrated and taken control of the legislatures so they can enact laws for their own unjust enrichment. For the most part, they occupy or control the offices of the executive branches of the governments of the several states so they can sign the legislative enactments into law. They absolutely control the judicial branch so they can adjudicate and enforce the laws and divide the spoils among them selves. They control the banks so they can launder their ill-gotten gains. These zealous advocates of injustice will strip you of everything of value you have if they are given the least opportunity. If you hire one to help you out of a scrape with the law, for the most part, you will end up in prison while your lawyer is sipping margueritas on the beach in Cancun, paid for with your money. Your ex-wife might even be with him. Only if you have as much money as T. Cullen Davis or O.J. Simpson once did, might you be able to buy yourself some justice. The justice these two colorful characters bought for themselves cost them their fortunes, but they evaded imprisonment and possible execution for a price paid in money.
Most people don’t have the financial resources with which to bribe the members of the bar, so they languish in prison while the lawyers take what little property they had, plus a bonus from the State for their “services.” When you go into a court accused of a “crime,” and are inclined to hire a lawyer or accept a court appointed lawyer to help you out, remember that the lawyer is being paid by the STATE and is licensed by the STATE, the judge is licensed and paid by the STATE, the jury is licensed and paid by the STATE (they at least have driver licenses, don’t they?), the prosecutor is licensed and paid by the STATE. If the judge orders a psychological evaluation to determine if you are competent to stand trial, the psychobabelist is also licensed and paid by the STATE. The cop that accused you and who will testify against you is licensed and paid by the STATE. If you are tried and sentenced to death, the cleric who comes to pray for your miserable soul before the execution is licensed and paid by the STATE. The guy who sticks the needle in your arm for the euthanasia is licensed and paid by the STATE. After they inject you with poison, the doctor that pronounces you dead is licensed and paid by the STATE. Could there be a hint of conflict of interest here? If the reader has ever had any experience with the modern criminal injustice system, the term “contempt of court” has taken on a whole new meaning for him.
The lawyers fill the prisons with people who have injured no one but are convicted of statutory crimes of a maritime jurisdiction. Prisons are filled with people whose only “crime” was to be in possession of a substance that they, the lawyers, have declared to be illegal. Good parents are separated from their children for attempting to discipline them, or because of divorce. Fathers are in prison because they cannot pay the court ordered child support; it is blatantly imprisonment for debt. People are in prison for exercising their presumed right to keep and bear arms. People are routinely thrown in jail for non-jailable traffic offenses and the Supreme Court in Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, #99-1408, (Apr. 24, 2001) has said it is OK. People are jailed every day for such heinous offenses as not wearing a seat belt or not paying a “motor vehicle” registration fee. America, the land of the slave and the home of the fee, has more people in prison and more people on death row than any other country in the world, and new prisons are being built every day. And in order to keep these new prisons filled beyond Capacity, the various lawyer-controlled legislatures are busy enacting more and more new statutory maritime crimes.
Woe be unto you if you don’t pay a tax that is presumed to be due. If you don’t pay up, the zealous advocates of injustice will drag you into their secret maritime jurisdiction on the presumption of a tax debt and steal your bank account, your car, your home and anything else they can find. You may even go to prison. If you resist too much or know too much, they will send their minions, the police, to assassinate you in broad daylight with impunity. The lawyers protect their obedient minions. These police agencies, whose motto is “to protect and serve,” get away with murder on a routine basis. Yes, they do protect and serve their masters, the lawyers, very well. This is why this essay must be spread far and wide as quickly as possible. The word must get out. The attorneys will stop at nothing to keep the scheme of their maritime jurisdiction secret. One advantage that the people have is that the rats are not yet totally in control of the Internet. Please use it; if you have a web page, please post this article. Another advantage that the people have is numbers; there are more of us than there are of them. The greatest advantage that the people have is the truth. The lawyers fear it; they go to extraordinary lengths to suppress it. If you want to know what fear smells like, find a judge after you read this article and explain what you are about to learn from the succeeding pages. Mail copies of this article to every lawyer, judge, legislator and sheriff you can, if you know of any who can read. Let the pungent odor of fear waft across the land. They know that once the truth escapes it cannot be held back and once again covered with darkness, at least not for several generations. When they are exposed, they will be powerless and vulnerable. People eventually recognize the truth; the truth is light, and the darkness flees from the light. The American people still have a sense of justice, and the lawyers especially fear justice.
How have they gotten away with the fraud for so long and managed to keep secret the maritime jurisdiction that has come onto land? The answer is; because the lawyers also control the fourth estate and institutions of religion and learning. The news media aids and abets the Esquires by suppressing the truth and perpetrating lies. It is a form of Orwellian mass mind control. The people are constantly fed a stream of propaganda through the network news, the newspapers, the public schools, colleges and universities (all lawyer controlled), and most especially, the incorporated 501(c)3 churches. Like all other corporations these churches are controlled by lawyers. The corporations that the people work for aid and abet the lawyers by perpetuating the false truths in their corporate policies. The subliminal messages transmitted are the lies that America is a free country, slavery is abolished, America is the great land of opportunity, there is separation of church and state, and “good Americans” and especially “good Christians” should submit to the government; it is the patriotic “Christian” thing to do. These themes never cease; they are constantly bombarded and ingrained into the psyche of the people. Hitler recognized in his work, Mein Kampf that if you told a lie and repeated and reinforced it often enough, the people would begin to accept the lie as a truth. The bigger and more outrageous the lie the better. After a period of time, when the lie is sufficiently programmed into the psyche of the national consciousness and is accepted as truth, the human mind does a remarkable thing. If the truth is then presented, it will be rejected as a lie. The psychobabelists have recognized this phenomena and describe it as cognitive dissidence. This cognitive dissidence can be compared to programming a computer; if you program lies and false information into the computer, it will spew out lies and false information or just lock up completely and cease to function. Junk goes in; junk comes out. This cognitive dissidence is powerful and difficult to overcome. Your authors have struggled to overcome it for years.
Another method very successfully used by the lawyers to keep their secret under the cover of darkness is the age-old strategy of sending their minions to infiltrate, divide and conquer any organization of people banding together to resist the present tyranny of the injustice system. The authors have personally witnessed the effectiveness of this strategy. The minions of the Esquires sent to infiltrate “patriot organizations” are intelligent, skillful and highly trained in the arts of deception and betrayal. They are people of likable personalities, who are able to gain trust, induce people into “offending” some maritime penal regulation and set them up for prison. The most active or successful “patriots” are the ones on the top of the list to be targeted. They must be beaten into submission or “neutralized,” sometimes with extreme prejudice; witness the fate of Gordon Kahl. Some of these infiltrators are undoubtedly honest people that have run afoul of a maritime penal regulation and have caved in to the pressure put on them by lawyers and their minions to inform on others in order to avoid incarceration. Some do it purely for money. Others are agents of the lawyers who travel the “patriots’ circuit” holding seminars and disseminating false information and “sure fire remedies” guaranteed to be the proverbial magic bullets. Many good people have lost their property and liberty pursuing these false remedies sold by patriots for profit who are paid by the attorneys to lie and then double dip into their victim’s pocket by selling the false information. And then there are other patriots holding seminars who truly believe that they have the answer, and end up in jail after an attempt to apply their own theory. It is understandable how one can fall victim to a false “patriot for profit” scheme. Your authors have been victims of some of these schemes. People that run afoul of the American system of injustice are so desperate for some relief that they become easy targets of opportunity. Live and learn. The age-old warning of caveat emptor should be applied to this instant article. Do your own research and check it out. Education, however it is obtained, is usually expensive. Hopefully, most folks learn by their mistakes.
But the dawn is near; the sun is rising. The path traveled by those seeking the truth of the fraud has been a long and arduous journey. It passes through a jungle growing over the hollow remnants of many small businesses, the ruins of family farms, the shells of homes once occupied by close-knit families, and passes by dead bodies and graves marking the way. The path to truth has been filled with stumbling blocks seemingly insurmountable and many forks lead to false trails. Many who have started down the path have found the journey so difficult that they have turned back. Others, more determined and of stronger character have perished along the way. A great debt is owed to those who have blazed the trail before us and marked at least part of the way, marked false trails and removed some of the stumbling blocks. Without the knowledge that they have gained to be built upon, your authors would have never discovered what they have.
This article is not the work of any one man. It is the accumulated work of many. It is the culmination of many pieces of a giant puzzle that has been assembled with Divine intervention. The authors sincerely believe that the timing of this revelation of fraud is keyed to the timetable of the Creator. His plan for the destiny of mankind and the Universe has existed from the beginning, and the Plan is nearing the final stages of execution. The lawyers are soon to suffer the woes described in the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 23. The secular judges are soon to be judged by the Judge of the Universe. How can they defend themselves? You may be assured that most of all they live in fear of their own judgment before the Supreme Judge. They are responsible for their own actions as observed by one jurist in the case of Robin v. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson 109; 1 Am Jur 2d 14: “A legislature must not obstruct our obedience to Him from whose punishments they cannot protect us.”

JANUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.625955 to

JANUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.625952 to
The BLM and FBI are called “government agencies” but are nothing but subcontractors working in behalf of other “governmental services corporations” fronted by international banking cartels. Right now you fellows are going through a changing of the guards while you attempt to pull off yet another institutionalized fraud scheme in which you fail to inform birthright American State Citizens of your undisclosed activities designed to entrap them, copyright their given names, roll over their estates into Cestui Que Vie Trusts and Public Transmitting Utilities and defraud them the rest of their lives while you feed off of them and their labor like parasites.
Right now, your “agencies” have “presumed” to act against your employers and benefactors again.
Be advised that your activities are being closely monitored by other governments and international agencies around the world. Be advised that the Hammonds and the Bundys have clearly and repeatedly Self-Declared their actual political status and that the ONLY purpose for the EXISTENCE of the “Bureau of Land Management” or the “Federal Bureau of Investigations” is to provide these “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” (Definitive Treaty of Peace, Article 3) with “essential governmental services” (Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2).
Those “essential governmental services” do not include mischaracterization, fraud, racketeering, threats, false claims, identity theft, or any other action detrimental to them and their interests. The ONLY reason for this government or any other to exist is the protection of the people and their material assets.
We have had enough of your Bully Boy tactics and your provocations and your false arrests and your false charges under conditions of personage and barratry. We have had enough of your criminality and lack of regard for the Public Law and the only equity contract allowing your presence on this Continent.
The federal corporations are no better nor of any different character than any commercial corporations in the world. If McDonald’s and Target cannot ram around using commercial mercenary armies to terrify the populace, neither can you.
We are establishing a commercial lien for damages of $100 billion United States Dollars (USD) defined as one ounce of fine silver for the loss of any one Oregon State Citizen murdered by any federal corporation employee, mercenary, subcontractor, agent or ally, with an additional $100 billion (USD) to be paid directly as compensation to their families.
The Oregon State will be bringing war crimes charges against the “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE” before the World Court if even one American is harmed by the FBI and more charges will be brought against the BLM.
Consider this your First Public Notice of these facts and of the pending Commercial Lien Obligation.
Submitted by: Wynter Moon

JANUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.625948 to
Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·
Specifcs for Sheriffs and Federal Agents Regarding Differences Between "Law Enforcement" and "Peacekeeping"
This information is cruclal. I had no idea that the men in these positions were not aware of these facts. Please, everyone, do everything you possibly can to put this information into the hands of every police officer, every Sheriff, every member of the military, every Provost Marshal, every judge, every lawyer, anyone and everyone who needs to know. Post it on Bulletin Boards, make flyers, do videos, whatever it takes.
The Articles of Confederation, The Declaration of Independence, and The Constitution are Organic Law of the Land. The Law of the Land is all Common Law. It functions on the land jurisdiction of the United States and is attached to it. A Common Law Court functions only within the geographically defined boundaries it serves. All the offices associated with a Common Law jurisdiction or a Common Law Court including the Office of Sheriff are by definition Public Offices. They are administered under the Organic Law and the Public Law of the United States known as the United States Statutes at Large. All Public Offices serve the government "of the people, for the people, and by the people". All Public Offices are created and maintained by unincorporated body politics---- free associations of landowners and other members of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States". As you can see from reading Amendment VII, all conflicts arising between people and affecting private property of value in excess of $20 are owed service by a Common Law Court. The Sheriff on the land is responsible for the enforcement of the Organic Law of our nation, including The Constitution, and the Public Law. He is the highest peacekeeping officer in America within the boundaries of his County. He has sweeping powers to deputize men and commandeer equipment, facilities, and supplies to secure the peace and guarantee the enforcement of the Organic Law. A Sheriff on the land is elected by the people acting in free association as landowners in their counties. He has a Public Bond and he has an Oath of Public Office.
But, when you incorporate anything, you remove it from the jurisdiction of the land and from the Law of the Land.
Thus, when our Counties and States incorporated as franchises of the Federal "United States, Inc."---either out of stupidity or treasonous intent, they became franchises in the same sense as we have franchises of Dairy Queen. They no longer function as our organic counties or states. They function as private corporate entities no different than Burger King or Walmart. They have no authority as government, and are merely "governmental services corporations". All the offices that were public offices associated with them immediately also devolve to merely private status. Thus the "Sheriff" working for such a "Federal County" or "Federal State" is no longer a Public Official. He is a private security officer working for a private corporation, no different than a mall cop working for Walmart. The fact that he may or may not be working on a contract requiring him to provide "law enforcement services" in a particular county in no way imbues him or his office with any governmental authority or immunity. His job is to ride herd on corporations in general and employees of federal corporations especially. These corporations set up as franchises of the parent federal corporation are all required to abide by the in-house rules of the "United States, Inc." or whatever federal corporation is acting as Queen Bee at the time. Theirs is a government "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation". His job does not involved enforcement of the Organic or Public Laws. His job is merely "code, statute, and regulation enforcement" that is meant to apply solely to corporations and corporate entities--- trusts, transmitting utilities, and so on. He does not have a Public Bond, does not have an Oath of Public Office, He's in the same status as a Mall Cop and has no lawful right to deputize anyone or commandeer anything. He is in private rather than public capacity and should not continue to call himself a "Sheriff" because there are no Sheriffs operating within the international jurisdiction of the sea and continuing to call himself a "Sheriff" sets up a condition of constructive fraud for which he can be held accountable.
The same applies to the FBI, FEMA, DHS, BATF, IRS, and the host of other quasi-law enforcement "agencies" out there. They continue to act as if they had something to do with the lawful government of the United States and as if they had some authority over the people of the United States, when in fact they do not and never have had. The rule is that if you can't do something acting in your private capacity, you can't do it, period, not at all. If you can't bust down your neighbor's door and face-slam his teenage daughter and ransack their house looking for imaginary "contraband" as Joe Average, you can't do it as a Mall Cop, either.
The only people who have that kind of authority are "Peacekeeping Officers" working for the unincorporated government of the land, and they are required to abide by the Organic Laws and Public Laws and to operate under Common Law when they do it.
In 1976 the rats in "Congress" operating as the Board of Directors of the "United States, Inc."---- a doing business name of the International Monetary Fund--- declared with no lawful authority at all, that all our state offices and state laws were "vacated" and released to the trusteeship of the United Nations. See the International Organizations Immunity Act and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Of course, nobody bothered to tell us.
This had the affect of further removing all Federal County and Federal State and Federal Agency personnel from any valid Public Office. Even though these "agencies" have continued to use the names of our public government offices and units, such as the "Bureau of Land Management" and "U.S. Small Business Administration" and "Sheriff of Macon County"---- these are merely trademarked names, like brand names under new management, and have no meaning in terms of their actual authority or function.
The FBI Agents out in Oregon are acting under Color of Law and pretending to be under the administration of our lawful government, when in reality they are just hired commercial mercenaries acting at the behest of unknown private interests--- mostly banks--- and, as a result, they are engaged in armed racketeering on American Soil, against the American people, who are in fact paying their salaries via a criminally mismanaged "governmental services contract".
So it is really very simple for anyone to determine exactly who these people are and what their status is. Are they working for an incorporated entity or not? If yes, they are working in a private capacity and have no lawful public function at all.
Virtually all the Sheriffs in this country have been converted in this surreptitious way from being "peacekeeping officers" to being "law enforcement officers" --- leaving nobody in charge of enforcing the Organic Laws and Public Laws of this nation, except the People themselves, even though the People have continued to loyally pay through the nose for "Sheriffs" and "Deputies" and other such "services" aplenty.
Now, given this as a background---- all you "Sheriffs" and "Deputies" and "FBI Agents" and others involved in this travesty--- have to ask yourselves two questions:
1. Am I working for a corporation?
2. Am I therefore working in private or public capacity?
If you work all day enforcing "codes, statutes, and regulations" you are a Mall Cop working for some version or franchise of the current "federal corporation" as a private "law enforcement officer" operating under international law. Any presentation or pretense otherwise is constructive fraud. You have no public office, no public bond, no capacity to exert any governmental authority on anybody.
If you work all day long enforcing the Organic Law and Public Law you are a Peacekeeping Officer acting with all the authority of the actual government owed to the land jurisdiction of the people of the United States behind you.
All corporations and all employees of all corporations are obligated to obey the Organic and Public Laws of this nation and if you do not, you are acting as an "Outlaw" on the land or a "Pirate" on the sea-----that is, as criminals.
You are also perpetuating war crimes against unarmed non-combatants when you trespass upon private property and pretend to have any jurisdiction over it. The people of this country have the absolute right to defend their lives and their property with armed force, and even more so, when the threat and trespass is being offered by their own misdirected employees who are required to provide them with Good Faith Service.
Everyone on both sides of this circumstance needs to wake up.
All those presently acting as "corporate Sheriffs" and "FBI Agents" and "DHS Agents" and so on need to recognize the very, very thin ice they are skating on and be very circumspect in their actions.
At the same time, they need to be asking themselves--- hey, wait a minute! I am not a "citizen" of District of Columbia nor an employee of the bankrupt District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, and even less am I aware of being a UN Corporation employee! What is going on here~! What am I doing? There's no parachute for me. I have been recognized as merely a private corporate Mall Cop, trespassing on private property, which is against the Public Law!
And those militia men are right. They are here to enforce the Organic and Public Law of this nation.
In most cases, the "corporate Sheriffs" love this country and want to serve their communities, they are just clueless about the insane web that has been cast around them and the way that their authority and office has been altered via the mechanisms of incorporation.
There is nothing stopping any of these men from reclaiming their own poltiical status as "one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States" and occupying the actual vacated Public Office of Sheriff. There is then nothing stopping them from deputizing as many men as they deem necessary to arrest the criminals responsible for misdirecting and misinforming them and causing all this harm to this country and the people they are bound to serve.

JANUARY 9 2016 Visiter No.625929 to

mike & ann: clarke refugees exiled from the UK INCORPORATED corrupt court system commiting genocide of christians by cleansing them out of their own country similar to NORMAN SCARTH.

JANUARY 9 2016 Visiter No.625909 to
COMMON LAW - Anna von Reitz
Specifics for Sheriffs and Federal Agency Personnel --- the Vital Difference Between Law Enforcement and Peacekeeping
The Articles of Confederation, The Declaration of Independence, and The Constitution are Organic Law of the Land. The Law of the Land is all Common Law. It functions on the land jurisdiction of the United States and is attached to it. A Common Law Court functions only within the geographically defined boundaries it serves. All the offices associated with a Common Law jurisdiction or a Common Law Court including the Office of Sheriff are by definition Public Offices. They are administered under the Organic Law and the Public Law of the United States known as the United States Statutes at Large. All Public Offices serve the government "of the people, for the people, and by the people". All Public Offices are created and maintained by unincorporated body politics---- free associations of landowners and other members of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States". As you can see from reading Amendment VII, all conflicts arising between people and affecting private property of value in excess of $20 are owed service by a Common Law Court. The Sheriff on the land is responsible for the enforcement of the Organic Law of our nation, including The Constitution, and the Public Law. He is the highest peacekeeping officer in America within the boundaries of his County. He has sweeping powers to deputize men and commandeer equipment, facilities, and supplies to secure the peace and guarantee the enforcement of the Organic Law. A Sheriff on the land is elected by the people acting in free association as landowners in their counties. He has a Public Bond and he has an Oath of Public Office.
But, when you incorporate anything, you remove it from the jurisdiction of the land and from the Law of the Land.
Thus, when our Counties and States incorporated as franchises of the Federal "United States, Inc."---either out of stupidity or treasonous intent, they became franchises in the same sense as we have franchises of Dairy Queen. They no longer function as our organic counties or states. They function as private corporate entities no different than Burger King or Walmart. They have no authority as government, and are merely "governmental services corporations". All the offices that were public offices associated with them immediately also devolve to merely private status. Thus the "Sheriff" working for such a "Federal County" or "Federal State" is no longer a Public Official. He is a private security officer working for a private corporation, no different than a mall cop working for Walmart. The fact that he may or may not be working on a contract requiring him to provide "law enforcement services" in a particular county in no way imbues him or his office with any governmental authority or immunity. His job is to ride herd on corporations in general and employees of federal corporations especially. These corporations set up as franchises of the parent federal corporation are all required to abide by the in-house rules of the "United States, Inc." or whatever federal corporation is acting as Queen Bee at the time. Theirs is a government "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation". His job does not involved enforcement of the Organic or Public Laws. His job is merely "code, statute, and regulation enforcement" that is meant to apply solely to corporations and corporate entities--- trusts, transmitting utilities, and so on. He does not have a Public Bond, does not have an Oath of Public Office, He's in the same status as a Mall Cop and has no lawful right to deputize anyone or commandeer anything. He is in private rather than public capacity and should not continue to call himself a "Sheriff" because there are no Sheriffs operating within the international jurisdiction of the sea and continuing to call himself a "Sheriff" sets up a condition of constructive fraud for which he can be held accountable.
The same applies to the FBI, FEMA, DHS, BATF, IRS, and the host of other quasi-law enforcement "agencies" out there. They continue to act as if they had something to do with the lawful government of the United States and as if they had some authority over the people of the United States, when in fact they do not and never have had. The rule is that if you can't do something acting in your private capacity, you can't do it, period, not at all. If you can't bust down your neighbor's door and face-slam his teenage daughter and ransack their house looking for imaginary "contraband" as Joe Average, you can't do it as a Mall Cop, either.
The only people who have that kind of authority are "Peacekeeping Officers" working for the unincorporated government of the land, and they are required to abide by the Organic Laws and Public Laws and to operate under Common Law when they do it.
In 1976 the rats in "Congress" operating as the Board of Directors of the "United States, Inc."---- a doing business name of the International Monetary Fund--- declared with no lawful authority at all, that all our state offices and state laws were "vacated" and released to the trusteeship of the United Nations. See the International Organizations Immunity Act and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Of course, nobody bothered to tell us.
This had the affect of further removing all Federal County and Federal State and Federal Agency personnel from any valid Public Office. Even though these "agencies" have continued to use the names of our public government offices and units, such as the "Bureau of Land Management" and "U.S. Small Business Administration" and "Sheriff of Macon County"---- these are merely trademarked names, like brand names under new management, and have no meaning in terms of their actual authority or function.
The FBI Agents out in Oregon are acting under Color of Law and pretending to be under the administration of our lawful government, when in reality they are just hired commercial mercenaries acting at the behest of unknown private interests--- mostly banks--- and, as a result, they are engaged in armed racketeering on American Soil, against the American people, who are in fact paying their salaries via a criminally mismanaged "governmental services contract".
So it is really very simple for anyone to determine exactly who these people are and what their status is. Are they working for an incorporated entity or not? If yes, they are working in a private capacity and have no lawful public function at all.
Virtually all the Sheriffs in this country have been converted in this surreptitious way from being "peacekeeping officers" to being "law enforcement officers" --- leaving nobody in charge of enforcing the Organic Laws and Public Laws of this nation, except the People themselves, even though the People have continued to loyally pay through the nose for "Sheriffs" and "Deputies" and other such "services" aplenty.
Now, given this as a background---- all you "Sheriffs" and "Deputies" and "FBI Agents" and others involved in this travesty--- have to ask yourselves two questions:
1. Am I working for a corporation?
2. Am I therefore working in private or public capacity?
If you work all day enforcing "codes, statutes, and regulations" you are a Mall Cop working for some version or franchise of the current "federal corporation" as a private "law enforcement officer" operating under international law. Any presentation or pretense otherwise is constructive fraud. You have no public office, no public bond, no capacity to exert any governmental authority on anybody.
If you work all day long enforcing the Organic Law and Public Law you are a Peacekeeping Officer acting with all the authority of the actual government owed to the land jurisdiction of the people of the United States behind you.
All corporations and all employees of all corporations are obligated to obey the Organic and Public Laws of this nation and if you do not, you are acting as an "Outlaw" on the land or a "Pirate" on the sea-----that is, as criminals.
You are also perpetuating war crimes against unarmed non-combatants when you trespass upon private property and pretend to have any jurisdiction over it. The people of this country have the absolute right to defend their lives and their property with armed force, and even more so, when the threat and trespass is being offered by their own misdirected employees who are required to provide them with Good Faith Service.
Everyone on both sides of this circumstance needs to wake up.
All those presently acting as "corporate Sheriffs" and "FBI Agents" and "DHS Agents" and so on need to recognize the very, very thin ice they are skating on and be very circumspect in their actions.
At the same time, they need to be asking themselves--- hey, wait a minute! I am not a "citizen" of District of Columbia nor an employee of the bankrupt District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, and even less am I aware of being a UN Corporation employee! What is going on here~! What am I doing? There's no parachute for me. I have been recognized as merely a private corporate Mall Cop, trespassing on private property, which is against the Public Law!
And those militia men are right. They are here to enforce the Organic and Public Law of this nation.
In most cases, the "corporate Sheriffs" love this country and want to serve their communities, they are just clueless about the insane web that has been cast around them and the way that their authority and office has been altered via the mechanisms of incorporation. There is nothing stopping any of these men from reclaiming their own poltiical status as "one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States" and occupying the actual vacated Public Office of Sheriff. There is then nothing stopping them from deputizing as many men as they deem necessary to arrest the criminals responsible for misdirecting and misinforming them and causing all this harm to this country and the people they are bound to serve.

The Answer to: "What is the gold fringe on the courtroom flag about?" and Related Questions About the Nature of the Courts
Answer for Leslie-- you are recalling a 1938 case known as Thompkins v. Erie Railroad in which the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that the Federal Government has no such thing as General Common Law and is therefore incompetent to fulfill Article VII.
As the rats continued their efforts to take over our courts and our country they adopted the one form of euphemistically named "common law" they had in their bag of tricks, which is known variously as "Special Admiralty" and "Executive Admiralty" and most tellingly as "martial common law"--- that is the form of the law being practiced under the gold fringed flag.
To bring you under this jurisdiction they have to pretend that you are a "rebel" and "enemy combatant" instead of admitting who you really are.
This form of law was adopted in the wake of the Civil War. Normal courts had been shut down in eleven Southern States. Congress told the military commanders of these "districts" to appoint whatever civilians they trusted to run local "tribunals" to deal with "rebels".
This created the infamous Carpetbagger Era.
Federal United States Citizens came from the North and ran these courts in a profoundly criminal fashion-- arbitrarily stealing the property of the Southerners under color of law.
The same thing has been done here and now.
As the county and state courts made the mistake of incorporating, they became franchises of the federal government corporation. As a result, we no longer had real state or county courts. Since about 1965 virtually all the courts in America pretending to be "state" or "county" courts are franchises run by the U.S. District Courts and they are ALL Federal Courts--- Federal State Courts, Federal County Courts--- all operating as federal corporation franchises, all operating in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea.
So-- what do you do when the Constitution requires that the people have access to Common Law and there is no Federal General Common Law and almost all the state and county courts in the country have either stupidly or treasonously been incorporated and thereby removed to federal jurisdiction?
You dig up "martial common law" and you make up the euphemistic names for it-- "Special Admiralty" and "Executive Admiralty" and you foist this known evil off on the trusting innocent American People and use it as a means to defraud and railroad them and plunder their estates and private and public resources.
Luckily for us, there was a U.S. Supreme Court case--Milligan Ex Parte in 1866, which addressed this situation and that decision still stands.
When American Common Law Courts are operating in an area, the Supreme Court found, there is no excuse for the operation of martial law courts.
So all we have to do is either dissolve the incorporation of the existing "state" and "county" courts and run them as unincorporated American Common Law Courts, or, what is more expedient, declare our own political status as one of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States", hold elections to fill our natural unincorporated public offices including Common Law Judges, Sheriffs, Clerks, Recorders, etc. and notify the rats that American Common Law Courts are operating again and use Milligan Ex Parte to shut the rats down.
All you have to do is get your ducks in order, declare your proper political status, hold your elections, fill your court offices, and show them the door.
The Bar Attorneys will either have to tear up their BAR Cards and come to work for the people's court, or restrict themselves to working in their proper capacity in purely administrative and maritime/Admiralty Courts of the Federal Government.
The Bar has been barred from holding any public office including judge in behalf of the people's government since 1819.
Now you have received a very useful and valuable history lesson and insight into the situation with the courts, what we are dealing with, how this situation, and what we have to do to put a stop to it.
Please share this information Far and Wide.

JANUARY 9 2016 Visiter No.625890 to
Dear MP Gordon Marsden
I frequently catch up on the marvellous work that you do.
HOWEVER, I have asked repeatedly about a RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION.
Can you please respond.
CONSIDERING you are of the same cloth ie 'GAY'
Something that we do have in common, one might expect a little more sympathy to our cause.
Also, the fact that my disabled mum of 75 years is having to endure such trauma regarding the resulting losses to her estate from the ongoing Court of Protection state mal administration, theft ,fraud and NOW persecution into exile, appears too, to have little effect on the effort being put into a resolution.
You once warned against criticising the Judiciary for corruption and if you are aware of such dangers you clearly know more and what they are capable of, to get away with.
The information I am gleaning from it, is that you too, fear that not conforming with the WILL of the judiciary, may also have an adverse effect on your own career.
Remember that your duty is to your constituents, not to corrupt entities, obviously running rife in our courts system.
Being duty bound, a public servant, I am clearly CALLING on those services with some URGENCY and further to this, the failing of which will be documented with our other allegations of MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE that are being collated on various PUBLIC SERVANTS, misconducts that in your case I still have on file of emails being ignored etc
It is now, where we need you to stand out and sit clearly on one side of the fence or the other?
So help me GOD, those whom are doing the LATTER I will expose.
Your competitor in the election PETER ANTHONY of the conservatives is a very close friend of mine of many many years and it is because of that friendship I really did wish him to win such is the desperation we find ourselves in with regard to help needed that am sure PETER would have assisted in the full capacity.
PIN your colours to the mast please MR MARSDEN because I now need to see them!!
Mike & Ann: Clarke
awaiting recorded delivery receipt to LABOUR HEAD OFFICE

JANUARY 8 2016 Visiter No.625888 to

JANUARY 8 2016 Visiter No.625884 to
TAKE NOTICE 28/11/2015

JANUARY 8 2016 Visiter No.625878 to

BANGKOK: -- Thailand is among the world's top seven countries for retirees to live as it has everything they need and want to make retirement life affordable, according to BBC.
A travel article written by BBC’s author Rob Budden this week said a growing number of pensioners are seeking far-flung destinations.
They’re lured by hours of sunshine, a slower pace of life, favourable tax rates, and the prospect of a more fulfilling lifestyle where their income goes much further than it does at home.
Considered carefully, retiring abroad can deliver all of the above without compromising home comforts or quality healthcare, he wrote.
He then guided seven best countries to retire from from tropical towns in Thailand to coastal comforts in Central America where he said they have it all.
The seven best places to live after retirement are Panama, Ecuador, Malaysia, Spain, Malta, Portugal, and Thailand.
For Thailand, he wrote that “Known as the “The Land of Smiles”, Thailand offers expats retiring here plenty to smile about — a low cost of living, tropical clime, culture that respects older people plus no tax on RETIREE income from abroad.
International Living magazine ranked the country as one of the cheapest in its cost of living index, buoyed by competitive property prices. Eating out remains reasonable with a typical Pad Thai lunch available from just $1.
As well, the country’s retirement visa, which is renewable annually, is available to all retirees with monthly pensions of 65,000 Thai baht ($1,800) or to pensioners depositing 800,000 baht ($22,125) in a Thai bank account.
While the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office rates many private hospitals in Thailand equivalent to western standards, it says standards at local hospitals can vary. Retirees should therefore budget to pay for local health insurance.
Further he wrote that a low cost of living, no tax on retiree income from abroad, a tropical climate and a culture that respects the elderly — what’s not to like in this retirement destination known as “The Land of Smiles”
Thailand is also the land of affordable living, according to International Living magazine. It ranked the country as the second least-expensive in its cost of living index, pointing out that an “over-the-top” luxury two-bedroom condo with great views can be rented for less than 40,000 baht ($1,200) per month. A Pad Thai lunch can be had for $1.
However, you should budget to pay for local health insurance as, while the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office rates many private hospitals to western standards, the group notes that standards at local hospitals vary, he noted.

JANUARY 7 2016 Visiter No.625845 to

JANUARY 7 2016 Visiter No.625840 to
Anna von Reitz
It's Late, Past Midnight Again.....
I just want to send out a little LOVE to all the Bar Association Members out there who are feeling like I really hate their guts and want to bash their rice bowls and do all sorts of mean, bad, and nasty things to them. (It's probably just an overactive guilty conscience, indigestion, or the flu.)
Of course, putting a huge commercial obligation lien on their organizations and reminding everyone that they are out of compliance with the Bar Association Treaty that allows them to be on our soil at all and that they have functioned as licensed privateers on our shores and helped defraud the American people and deny us remedy we are owed and generally been heavy contributors to the rotten state of the world in general....yes, I can see why you think that I despise members of the BAR.
What I really think is that many of you, more than half, have been kept as ignorant as your victims. I think that there are plenty of patriotic, God-fearing, decent, hard-working American Lawyers out there, who just need to do one thing to be reinstated as Americans and loyal members of Decent Society: tear up your BAR cards.
Just tear them up and set yourselves free. And then join us in the biggest housecleaning in history! Join the American Common Law Court System founded 1602, by far the oldest and most honorable Court System in the country, the most powerful, the most interesting, and by far the sweetest to work for.
Go to bed at night and sleep like a child (which I am about to do). Have a spotlessly clean conscience. Smile at all the poor sots that are being pelted with rotten eggs by outraged citizens. Be a hero instead. Best of all, actually do what you have been trained to do, and do it in an honorable way and for an honorable cause--- to save the country of your birth, to protect your family and friends and neighbors.
Don't stand around worrying that you won't be able to work in the courts. Pretty soon all the Special Admiralty courts in this country are going to be shut down. Pretty soon, the Federal Courts are going to be reduced to arguing over how many bales of hay were filched by Department of Agriculture employees last year. Pretty soon the only "Admiralty" cases you will ever see or hear about, will be actual cases in Admiralty--- you know, with real ships and real cargo? Imagine it.
Do you all realize that the Bar Associations that have indulged in all these crimes against America and Americans are also in violation of all sorts of Federal Law? They have been operating closed union shops for decades in open defiance of the Taft-Hartley Act and the Smith Act--- and getting away with it. They've been cracking the whip and controlling appointments and threatening you whenever you aren't politically correct? They've been increasing the fees and the penalties until its like dealing with the Gestapo and there is that really UNSAVORY "political" feeling to all of it?
Yup. Whether you are a rat or not, it's time to jump ship and start swimming.

JANUARY 7 2016 Visiter No.625828 to
Judge Anna von Reitz = THE WHOLE TRUTH & NOTHING BUT
There are three court systems in this country:
(1) Administrative Courts which are in-house corporate tribunals designed to oversee the operations of the "federal corporation" and its franchises and employees only;
(2) Maritime/Admiralty/Martial Courts which are of restricted jurisdiction and run under the delegated authority of the "Federal Government" by Bar Association Members;
Both of these above court systems are operated by Bar attorneys and they are all incorporated and they all run under international law in the Jurisdiction of the Sea and don't properly have a thing to do with anyone who isn't a federal employee, involved in seafaring, or otherwise naturally subject to their jurisdiction.
(3) Common Law Courts which came to this country with the Colonists and which have functioned on the land of this country for over 400 years are the courts "of the people, by the people, and for the people" -- and if you bother to carefully read Articles I, VI, and Amendment VII you will clearly see that ALL issues of Law pertaining to living people and their assets are to be tried at Common Law.
Common Law is the "Law of the Land" and so is The Constitution "Law of the Land" as opposed to "law of the corporations" (maritime) or "Law of the Sea" (Admiralty).
People are "land assets"--- we come from the land and go back to the land; we belong to the land, quite literally, and so we are owed the Law of the Land, but for several decades the self-interested "governmental services corporations" have contrived to avoid that fact and to instead press-gang all of us and our assets both public and private into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea and have prosecuted us under the false presumption that we are all British Crown Subjects owned lock, stock, and barrel by the British Crown Corporation.
This is the vicious unconscionable fraud scheme that these rotten criminals have perpetuated on the American People and had guts enough to promote on American soil.
The American Bar Association and the Internal Revenue Services are both owned and operated by Northern Trust, Incorporated, and that they are both private bill collection agencies and licensed privateer organizations operated by British Crown subsidiaries.
They don't have any public role or office at all.
They are not units of government.
They are not innocent professional organizations.
They are undeclared Foreign Agents and they are in default on the Treaty allowing them to be here: 1947 Bar Association Treaty.
Anna von Reitz 4 hrs · AGO
The "Oathkeepers" or the "Oath-Breakers"-- You All Be the Judge My opinion of Stewart is that he is a Yale Law School graduate and a Bar Association Member and he is engaged in Controlled Opposition.
My further opinion is that the ONLY reason that this is "not the issue" for Oathkeepers to support is that the natural resources the corporation Stewart actually works for is after in this case are SO very juicy.
My final opinion on the matter is that when a man or woman takes an Oath to uphold The Constitution, they must uphold it or be exposed as Oath-breakers instead of Oathkeepers.
The Jurisdiction of the Land owed to the People of the Oregon State is being violated by federal over-reach and that is a violation of The Constitution and the Law of the Land in general. The longevity of the mis-administration and fraud committed against the western states by the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and now, by its United Nations Trustees in receivership, in no way affects the standing and the political status of those men who have taken over the BLM facilities in protest of armed acts of "criminal aggression" in the words of the Nuremburg Trial, perpetuated by employees of the "Bureau of Land Management" which is nothing but a trademarked name acquired by the IMF as part of its deal with the entirely criminal and fraudulent Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration at Bretton Woods.
Read that as--- the "Bureau of Land Management" is precisely the same as a company name like "Stanley Tools" or "Kentucky Fried Chicken" that has been acquired by backdoor deals among private, mostly foreign-owned banking cartels in the business of providing "governmental services", and then "traded upon". The sharks come in, buy a recognized brand name like "Stanley Tools" which has enjoyed a good reputation for many years, and then start producing cheap knock offs that they sell at premium prices to the unsuspecting public, which is never made aware of the change of ownership and administration of the company and the brand.
In the same way the "governmental services organizations" have changed ownership and management and even the law under which they operate, all without telling the public a word about it, and thus defrauding the people they are supposedly serving.
The Members of "Congress" and the various "Presidents" since Roosevelt have been actively engaged in selling off brands like "Bureau of Land Management" and "U.S. Small Business Administration" and so on to foreign entities that then manage these "governmental services corporations" as they see fit. For example, back in the late 1980's they sold the "U.S. Small Business Administration" to Lehman Brothers Bank.
Lehman Brothers has always had a terrible reputation throughout the industry and nobody in their right mind would take their word for anything, much less enter into any kind of loan arrangement with the crooks---- but by buying a perfectly respectable "government" brand, they were able to snooker millions of unsuspecting Americans into various kinds of home loans and business development loans that they would have never touched, had they known that Lehman Brothers was involved.
Same thing with "BLM" and "FBI"--- People hear the name and assume that it is a government agency and that is trustworthy and that it "must be acting within the law". They never stop to question anything about it, never realize that they are being complete bamboozled, never catch on to the fact that "Congress" is totally out of control and lawless and that these "agencies" are being operated by foreign business enterprises and even foreign governments under international law that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Constitution and Law of the Land that the people are owed.
The entire "US District Court System" which is responsible for the operation of all the Federal State and Federal County Courts within their "districts" is in fact more properly named the "United States District of Columbia Municipal Corporation District Court"---- and since the District has been bankrupted and dissolved, it should even more properly be called something like "United States Federal Reserve System District Court", because that is who owns and is operating all these "courts" all across America.
Now, ask yourselves--- why would you be doing business with a "court" that is obviously an in-house corporate tribunal having nothing to do with the land jurisdiction of the United States or the people living here? Are you an employee of the Federal Reserve System? Probably not. But you have been misidentified and mischaracterized by the former tenant--- the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation --- as a British Crown Subject, and British Crown Subjects holding a "residence" on the land of the organic states are property --- literally chattel --- belonging to the Federal Reserve System. That's why their "courts" summon the Strawman Estate Trusts these criminals created in your name without your knowledge or consent into their "courts" and charge you with the 80,000,000 different regulations and code infractions that they have developed as a means of "criminalizing" you and extracting money from you and from your public treasury.
Remember that these multi-nationals are in the business of providing "governmental services"----and they will provide those services using strong-arm tactics whether you want them or not. Remember Obamacare? Hmm? Nothing like taking over the entire medical insurance racket in America to pad the old bottom line.
Remember the prison system? Why is it that we have far more people in jail than any other country on Earth? Because it is Big Money for these criminal corporations--- especially the Federal Reserve. First, they charge you with a "crime" under their in-house corporate system of administrative law---- which is not your system of law at all. Then, they attack the phony publicly managed "Estate Trust" or "Transmitting Utility" they set up "in your name".
According to their in-house "law", this "United States Citizen" can't even complain about their mistreatment. They are guilty from the moment they step foot in a courtroom and are already pre-sentenced. Read the 1868 Corporate Constitution's 14th Amendment.
They try to get you to pay for whatever "infraction" they charge against the phony ESTATE or TRANSMITTING UTILITY they are operating in your name, and they charge your public treasury $25,000.00 per misdemeanor and over a million for each felony for the service of merely bringing charges.
Then they incarcerate you as chattel ("cargo" in their lingo) belonging to the "guilty estate"---- and charge your public treasury up the wazoo for the "service" of keeping you in jail, plus they steal the value of all the labor they squeeze out of you while in jail.
These are your EMPLOYEES, for God's sake.
Stand up and boot them to the curb. They want to claim that you are a "14th Amendment Citizen"--- make them prove it. Where and when did you or your ancestors ever perform the duty imposed by the Public Law of this land--- 2 United States Statutes-at-Large 153, Subchapter 28, ss. 1?
You didn't and neither did your great-grandparents. It was all a corporate fraud that had no affect on any living American's political status at all. And it still is nothing but a corporate fraud and false claim.
Where, exactly, did you ever knowingly grant them permission to use your given name? Where did you grant them any power of attorney? Where is the fully disclosed two party contract providing equitable exchange with your signature on it? Let them produce it, in court, black and white.
Wake up, people, and stop trusting the brand names of things. Start looking at what is real and what is right in front of your face. If the "FBI" were working for the people of this nation and acting according to the Public Law we have established instead of taking their direction from crooked corporate bosses, they would be prosecuting the banks for mammoth securities and banking industry fraud instead of trying to steal natural resources from poor farmers at the points of guns and under the fraudulent presentation that they are "the government" instead of hired commercial mercenaries operating under color of law.

JANUARY 6 2016 Visiter No.625802 to

30 minutes in
JFK Executive order 11110

JANUARY 6 2016 Visiter No.625798 to

JANUARY 6 2016 Visiter No.625788 to
Yes, Dr. Cordero's work is wonderful documentation! Thank you for drawing my attention to it. We hope to soon have The Puzzle Project up and running-- a national level fact-finding mission in support of Public Interest Litigation before the World Court and the UN Trust Committees.
His work only suffers from the common ailment--- we all face such a LARGE fraud and attendant criminality which has taken root in so many countries and in so many sectors of society that it is natural to see the "tree" such as the so-called judicial system in the U.S. without grasping the larger picture.
The problem isn't just the judicial system running hopelessly amok. It's the fact that all these "governments" are actually nothing but privately owned and operated "governmental services corporations" being run by international banking cartels that have operated under conditions of secrecy and deceit to co-opt lawful government and instigate a vast web of fraud and criminality throughout the world.
It's not just the Federal United States. It's the "government" of the UK, CANADA, FRANCE, GERMANY, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN..... all fakes.
The truth has come out finally and conclusively. There are so many people to thank for that, it beggars description....but the rats have been fully and absolutely exposed. The criminality of the banking system has been fully documented by The Paradigm Project--- Heather Tucci-Jaref and others. A few American lawyers remained true to the American cause and a few DOD employees did too, and they all did their actual jobs. As a result, the bankers are caught, dead in the water.
And the fraud is at an end, no longer something that can be suppressed and contained by filthy politicians and bankers meeting in secret.
The rats in DC are in a bad position, and more and more of them are realizing it. 177 nations worldwide have recognized that the "Federal United States" has acted as a criminal syndicate and that it has been operating in a form and in a way forbidden by its charter and the treaty and trust documents allowing its existence, that it has not faithfully "represented" the Continental United States and the American People, but has instead been misusing and abusing Americans at home and then also misusing American resources including Armed Forces as Bullies against other countries, fomenting war for profit, and engaging in every kind of vice and war profiteering in "target countries".
While we Americans have been kept ignorant and clueless by the perpetrators of these fraud schemes (all of which are easily recognized classic bunko schemes merely executed on an unimaginably large scale) what I would most like to share with the rest of the world at this point is that the American People -- the People of the Continental United States as opposed to some elements operating the Federal United States ----are good people, moral people, peace-loving, hard-working, God-fearing people. We were lied to, bullied, purposefully deceived, taxed to death, deprived of basic rights guaranteed by our actual Constitution, press-ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea, and defrauded of our labor and our actual property assets. We suffered along with the rest of the world.
Those responsible include the Crown Corporation and its agencies and subsidiaries, the government of the Inner City of London aka WESTMINSTER, the Lord Mayor, the Lords of the Admiralty, the British Monarch dba ELIZABETH II, IMF, FEDERAL RESERVE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., and so on. Please note that the British Monarch is the American International Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways and that all the abuse we have suffered and which the rest of the world has endured, too, has been caused by British mismanagement and war-mongering for profit.
The other thing I would like the world to know is that many American government officials, even members of Congress, were kept in the dark. This entire criminal scheme was designed to be operated by just a few at the top.
Finally, I would like the rest of the world to know that preliminary estimates indicate that only about 20% of the money appropriated to fund domestic American welfare relief ever made it to any poor people, and less than 2% of the money appropriated as foreign aid ever made it to the intended recipients in other countries.
The American People have been defrauded and had the lion's share of their intended assistance to others at home and abroad siphoned off to fund criminal activities.
The facts are now speaking for themselves. Anyone who wants to argue with me or cast aspersions and suspicions at me as an individual should be advised--- I am not here to prove anything to anyone and I am not the issue. The issue is the information. The facts. The timeline. The fraud. Everyone in receipt of the information has the basic tools necessary to research these matters for themselves and they are fully invited to perform their own due diligence.
Numerous people from around the world have been contacting me and asking for help related to their own governments. The basics of what we have learned (at least to our satisfaction) is that the System was introduced in England in 1867 by Benjamin D'israeli, with legislation resulting in the "enfranchisement" of English workers.
At the time, this was hailed as a good thing by English Labor Union leaders and other Progressives who were deceived into thinking that the "right to vote" was an advancement of the position of the working class. It was in fact a means of further and officially enslaving the working class by a process of registration.
If you look up the legal meaning of the word "registration" you will learn that anytime you register something you are giving it or some aspect of it up to the ownership or control of the entity keeping the registration. It is not the same as publicly recording an ownership interest in a piece of property, for example. Thus, when you "register to vote" you give up your natural right to elect your leaders and in effect hand your proxy to whomever cares to exercise it.
The word "enfranchisement" relates to this undisclosed registration process, too, in terms of "enfranchised voters", but more darkly, it is used in the context of incorporation---- and that is what D'israeli aimed at with the Acts of Parliament involving Enfranchisement.
Think of large corporations that are operating in your various countries that have local franchises. In America, it might be McDonald's or Dairy Queen or Sears. These corporate franchises are obligated to be pretty much in lock-step with their national and international parent corporations and they operate under franchise licenses.
Anytime you see the word "license" be aware that it is official permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal--- in this case, the franchises receive the license to use the name, logo, recipes, products, etc., of the franchising corporation.
What does it mean to "enfranchise" a human being, in this sense of "enfranchisement"?
It means to reduce you to an incorporated thing, a subsidiary subject to the whims of corporate management. It means enslavement, body and soul. In supposedly equitable exchange you receive the benefit of voting for your slave masters and whatever privileges they give you, the right to be taxed and regulated to death, the right to be conscripted, the right to pay for a million dollar life insurance policy with the parent corporation named as your beneficiary, and so many other "benefits" it hardly pays to name them.
This is what we have been dealing with. Thanks to Benjamin D'israeli and a besotted Queen Victoria.
It also means that the banks, the Bar Associations, the Lords of the Admiralty and the Lord Mayor and the Queen engaged in a systematic program of press-ganging land assets into the international jurisdiction of the sea. This crime has been outlawed---utterly outlawed worldwide--- for 200 years. It carries the death penalty and they did it anyway, using a pathetic excuse.
Once they had "converted" all the living people and their estate interests into franchises of the various governmental services corporations, they could claim that they were justified in their actions because there is no law against enslaving a corporation.
In actual practice and fact, of course, they did enslave the living people and all their private property assets. This is how they were able to enforce "Selective Service" and other forms of "The Draft" during the Second World War. This is how they have been able to spend uncontrollably and rack up huge amounts of odious debt against the civilian populace.
By registering your birth, seizing control of your name, and creating all sorts of corporate franchises benefiting their own corporations named after you--- they--the bankers and lawyers and politicians effectively stole your identity and your credit cards.
Now we come to the issue of Odious Debt. Odious Debt is debt created by fraud of which the victims are unaware and from which they do not benefit. Much of the so-called "National Debts" around the world are this form of debt, and Odious Debt is not collectable.
It has to be written off and forgiven. This is what is behind Pope Francis's declaration of an International Year of Jubilee beginning December 8, 2015.
Beyond that, we also come to the issue of National Credit. All these fiat money systems have been operated as debt-credit systems. Every time you create a debt in such a system you also create a credit. Therefore, every National Debt is counterbalanced by a National Credit. Why have you never heard about your National Credit, only your National Debt?
Because the perpetrators fully intended to leave the working people holding the bag while they siphoned off and absconded with not only the National Credit owed, but the underlying actual physical assets as well.
They won't be able to do that now, because now you know the truth about "National Debts" and how those National Debts were accrued by credit fraud, and you also know that you are owed an equal National Credit.
Finally, everyone worldwide needs a lesson in the mechanisms of fraudulent convertible debt. A fraudulent convertible debt is a debt created by fraud that is converted into new ownership and used by the perpetrators as investment capital. The most typical example is the billing you receive every month for electrical service (at least in America this is true).
What appears to be a bill comes addressed to YOUR NAME in capital letters and your address. Unknown to you, this "billing statement" isn't really a true bill and it isn't addressed to you. It is addressed to a franchise of a governmental services corporation and the "statement" is actually a voucher allowing you to cash in a "dividend" equal to the amount shown as due and owing-- but of course, you are never told this and you are never told how to fill out the coupon for credit. Instead, if you don't submit payment you are threatened with disconnection, and in this way, you are coerced into paying the bills of a governmental services corporation's franchise.
Of course, the utility company submits the bill each month directly to the "government" and gets paid for servicing the franchise. That's payment Number One. Then they send you a billing statement and coerce you to pay it. That's payment Number Two. They establish a "capital credits account" in YOUR name and deposit your payment in that account. They then use that money as investment capital benefiting their utility company and prevent you from accessing the capital credit account you funded. In some cases, the utilities are so crooked they set the "capital credits" aside and later claim that they are "unclaimed funds" and abscond with them directly.
Fraudulent convertible debt always involves a double-dipping system in which a charge gets paid for twice by different parties. In effect, it gets you, the consumer, both coming and going. You are on the hook to pay for the "government's debts" --- so as a group you paid for payment Number One, and as an individual you were forced to provide payment Number Two as well.
The same exact system of fraudulent convertible debt is used throughout the mortgage industry. When you create a mortgage, it is never credited to you--- it is registered in YOUR NAME--- as being owned by a government franchise operated under your name, but not belonging to you. Remember that the governmental services corporation is the owner of YOUR NAME, which is the incorporated franchise they are running for their own benefit under your name without your knowledge or consent.
So you walk in to close what you are told is a loan being made to you, and what happens? The bank takes your Promissory Note, which has Actual Cash Value, just like a stack of bank notes, and they cash it. That's payment Number One, charged off against "the government", which of course passes the entire cost back to you and your brethren in the form of taxation. Then the bankers come back under false pretense that they actually loaned you something, and demand that you pay them back principal and interest for thirty years and claim that you also owe them a security interest in your property (which you gave them, albeit under conditions of fraud and deceit and non-disclosure) which they can foreclose upon if you fail to perform. That's payment Number Two---so, in effect, the banks charge you once, then charge you twice, plus interest, plus a security interest that is undeserved---and you fund all of it. You fund the first payment through your taxes to the "government" and you fund the second through more of your labor "donated" to the account of YOUR NAME and what really, did you receive?
You received access to credit in a bank account held in YOUR NAME, but not actually belonging to you, and you spent that credit on a home and property that is recorded in YOUR NAME but which doesn't actually belong to you, either. Both the purported debt and the property belong to the governmental services corporation's franchise. You are just an unpaid volunteer, doing all the work and producing all the credit to fund these operations, for the benefit of the franchise.
It's more usury, only this time, owing to the interest payments and security interest, it's more like quadruple dipping than double dipping.
And all this blatant fraud based on semantic deceits and coercion and racketeering and deceptively similar names has gone on under the noses of all those you trusted to regulate banking and securities, precisely because the banks were running the "governmental services corporations" behind the scenes and were "regulating themselves".
So what is the answer? Other than becoming aware yourself, spread the word. There will be too many of us for them to silence and once people know what went on, they will be stuck for it.
And what to do about replacing these criminal enterprises masquerading as governments? Well, we all know how our governments are supposed to be operated and by whom, and for most of us, that means we have to get involved.
The Americans are busy restoring their actual government on the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States. It's our understanding that Mrs. Merkel is doing her best in Germany and that numerous other heads of state are grappling with the facts and trying to bring remedy without bloodshed or disruption. Help them. We are informing the members of Congress that they have been elected to private corporate offices instead of public offices which they are meant to serve and that this has been accomplished by fraud and deceit. They have to choose their true allegiance and accept their true elected office in order to serve and represent the interests of the Continental United States as deputies and fiduciary officers----and they otherwise have no capability to enter into any valid contract in our behalf or claim to represent anyone but themselves and their own little group of cronies.
Meantime back home we are occupying the vacated public offices we are owed and we are operating our state and county governments as judges, sheriffs, bailiffs, clerks, legislators, and many other public offices under American Common Law.
Action is moving forward on an international basis to end the criminality, expose the fraud, and bring relief. Please keep your minds and hearts fixed upon what is good and right and just, and realize that the vast majority of the people who have been employed by these corporations have been innocent of the evil they have unwittingly done. Even many lawyers and judges are completely unaware that they were doing anything wrong. To echo Jesus Christ, "Forgive them, for they know not what they do."
----although they are going to learn very shortly, and be offered a choice!
In closing, I would like to paraphrase King George V --- "Keep calm and get even." Don't give way to rage or violence of any kind. Realize that your grievances have been fully documented and proven and that the Mills of God grind slowly but exceedingly fine. Those who are truly guilty cannot escape, those who have acted in error must be forgiven, and the innocent who have suffered will in the end by blessed by their own patience and kindness.

JANUARY 5 2016 Visiter No.625780 to

JANUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.625745 to

JANUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.625706 to

The Birth Certificate -- The Evidence of the Crime Against Your Life I have been asked to summarize this issue many times, so here it is in the proverbial nutshell.
The problem is that privately owned for-profit corporations under contract to provide government services have misrepresented themselves as the government and used that presumed position of public trust to defraud us, enslave us, and levy false claims against us and our assets in the foreign jurisdiction of international commerce.
The misuse and abuse of "birth certificates" and their misrepresentation as "voluntary private contracts" has led to the literal enslavement of hundreds of millions of people worldwide almost a hundred years after slavery was universally outlawed.
These issues of economic slavery and "slavery via corporate proxy" must be addressed and the mechanisms used to promote this abuse must be dismantled. LIEN YOUR NAME here
What is the Nature of the Fraud Against Us?
The fraud against us begins when the governmental services corporation misrepresents itself as the lawful government and gets us to trust it and go along with it under the false presumption that it is our government when in fact it is just a corporation in the business of selling governmental services.
The next fraud is when they seize upon your given name and copyright it and steal your identity without telling anyone they are doing this.
The third fraud is when they create a trust in your NAME and change your birthright political status without telling anyone.
The fourth fraud is when they fail to tell you that you have the right to reclaim your birthright status and have to take action to do so.
The fifth fraud is when they fail to provide a simple and official process by which to correct the records and repatriate to your native status.
Fraud occurs anytime a Material Fact is misrepresented or omitted so that the victim takes an action which is detrimental to him or fails to take an action resulting in harm to him.
And fraud has no statute of limitation.
As you can see, the self-interested governmental services corporation benefits greatly financially and in terms of holding power over you from doing all this behind the scenes paper-pushing and copyrighting and political status changing---without telling you anything about it.
And as you can also see, it's all pure fraud. I am wondering how long and what it is going to take before everyone realizes that the "federal" government is a foreign corporation, run by the IMF, which is UN agency, doing business as the "UNITED STATES"?? How long before everyone realizes that this foreign, for-profit "thing from Puerto Rico" is a criminal syndicate, operated by criminals, for criminals, by criminals?

JANUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.625685 to
Various victomised speakers such as PILOT LEN LAWRENCE & Yvonne Taylor and many others inclusive of myself.

JANUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.625660 to
CLICK HERE for previous entries made under 2015

We start the new year with this message & fresh outlooks to our future, as free people, all be it, EXILED in THAILAND, who are NOT state SLAVES of the UNITED KINGDOM, people who are NOT DEAD either, people who are NOT LOST AT SEA... referring of course to the treacherous UK ACT of 1666 the C'EST TUI QUE TRUST ... A FRAUD by NON DISCLOSURE.. a fraud of very serious nature USED in conjunction with the PROBATE RACKETEERS of the COURT of PROTECTIONs OFFICE of the PUBLIC GUARDIANS headed up by probate lawyer DENZIL ANTON LUSH.
IN matter of F.A.C.T. [families against court theft] ie COURT of Protection Probate racketeering, we are most definately ALIVE, LIVING, human flesh beings with souls & 'CAPACITY' that are in control of our own destiny.. that are NOT wards of the state or any ADMIRALTY MARITIME statute court THAT holds NO CONSENT and therefore NO CONTRACT and in reality NO JURISDICTION, as a matter of fact we WILL as always act upon the LAND, under COMMON LAW, that most certainly is ALIVE and NOT DEAD either.
WE will rebut any other claim to the contrary and we will fight vigorously to restore our rights to JUSTICE for those that claim to be the LIVING and for those who want to remain DEAD is for them to suffer & stand under the state. DO YOU UNDERSTAND! because we, REPEAT we, do not STAND UNDER - state fudiciary C'EST TUI QUE TRUST FRAUD.. A FRAUD by NON DISCLOSURE.
WE STAND against "GROSS FUDICIARY TRUST FRAUD" that the british crown has enforced upon us and our nation.
RESTORATION OF OUR PROPERTY, MONEY, JUSTICE and OUR RIGHTS is our only goal, so if you THE STATE and its associated agents especially under THE BAR, have any other plan for me or my mother, whom is my property by her own choice, YOU WILL HAVE an even bigger BATTLE than you think, and I intend to bury those that try! - HAPPY NEW YEAR 2016.
The criminal JEWdicial actions thrust upon us over the last few years are being currently documented as MISCONDUCT in PUBLIC OFFICE as a TRUST FRAUD of immense proportions that needs urgent redress in REAL TERMS, probably by GRAND JURY.

Back to top

THE NUTS/BOLTS OF OUR EVIDENCE SENIOR MASTER JUDGE DENZIL ANTON LUSH (born 18/7/1951 Southsea, Hants) - in holding the ultimate fudiciary responsibilty to demonstrate there being no fraud or breach of contract of the 1st general order where he stated; “The reasonable fees and expenses of a professional receiver are recoverable from the defendant in the personal injury action as a head of damage. They do not simply fall on the patient’s fund.” & for ignoring the doctors reports stating my mother had capacity from the beginning and then sending his own corrupt doctor whom did not conduct a clinical examination. Also for his collusion with the perpetrator of further crimes, his appointed deputy...
DEPUTY RECEIVER & CROOK HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES ( born on 24/06/1955 ) and his failure to account as to what had happened to £1.1 million pounds inclusive of his breach of contract in the 1st general order stating; “the family should rest assured that my costs will not be eroding the capital settlement agreed for their mothers care and other specific needs.” & his 'fraud by false representation' when the patient emigrated outside the jurisdiction of England & Wales losing £100,000 of the client funds in exchange rate losses in a 'neglect of duty'. meeting 07.02.2011 - meeting 18.07.2011 - others to follow
MARTIN JOHN - the then chief executive of the Office of the Public Guardian and his failure to provide a proper detailed investigation showing good reasons to show there was no theft fraud mal administration.
CHIEF CONSTABLE PETER FAHY for his failure to investigate a reported white collar crime of Theft Fraud and Mal administration and also provide a crime reference number on the 4 occasions it has been asked for. Further today 30/11/2013 Six out of 10 crimes are not investigated, admits Sir Peter Fahy READ.
JUDGE PETER ARTHUR BRIAN JACKSON (born 9 December 1955), for his failure to take account of the LIVING WILL that he authorised mums capacity to make & then after reading it where he later then, ring fenced her property giving an order that it could not be sold in her lifetime, so that she could not do with it as she pleased with her living will executor wilfully breaching 'part 24' of the WILLS act 1837 & also right to a private life Article 8 of ECHR.
JUDGE ADMINISTRATOR Philip Mark Pelling QC and so called "Nominated COURT OF PROTECTION Judge" whom conducted a TREASONOUS, BIASED, UNFAIR administrative statute tribunal, WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY & without the consent of all parties where he abandoned the court to have our representation thrown out by security after they claimed common law jurisdiction and requested a JURY after which he returned to hand down a 3 month prison sentence to the protected party/CARER of 17 years flying in the face of statute Mental Capacity ACt 2005 section 5 and thus the protection of carers from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a so called patient of the court of protection whom
Watch a video statement by my representation to radio station of 7mins
NOTE:There has been no published judgement I wonder WHY?

READ our submission to the House of Lords select committee meeting on Mental Capacity Act, Committee. Where this submission along with lots of others containing vital evidence have been returned, deleted or just unread because Chairman LORD HARDIE said, 'they contain NAMES'!!! So er, hang on if you go to the POLICE as we have and do not give a name how can they investigate... not that the POLICE do anyway as they too will not even give reference numbers/log numbers!! The term to remove let's say sensitive information is called REDACTION would it not have been the most polite thing to do is remove the names but keep the evidence that the most vulnerable, 'hands on' people, suffering at the hands of the Mental Capacity Act could be heard!! What we have here LORD HARDIE is another whitewash dismissing the most vulnerable people in another act of FRAUD!
Read the 1st general order of the 20.03.2001 pdf in particular the highlighted paragraphs.
READ the Sibling's lack of CREDABILITY statements 19.1.2012.
In 1998 READ the Total Original Claim of £1.7 million and in it you will see the schedule for receiver costs based on the full claim & a lifespan of 83(not 70 as stated by deputy HUGH JONES). You will see also the setup costs schedule of £4000(not £26,377 as was charged by HUGH JONES).
The reduced compromised settlement was £775,000. You can see where an appeal on the grounds of capacity was unsuccesfully made with 2off 4 hour clinical specialists stating my mother had capacity READ here & this Dr's back up telephone converstaion to Listen to, stating my mother should not be under that court.
You can Listen here to the 40 minute!! unclinical exam from the state's court, a Doctor Khan, that was the pinacle deciding factor for DENZIL LUSH(Matser of the court) to keep mum under the court.
10 years later & we commissioned 2 more doctors of 4 hour exams claiming my mother still has capacity READ the 2010 & READ the 2011.
So on and so forth... if you take the time to read the diary here from the bottom to the top it will demonstrate the shear corruption and evil forces at work upon the vulnerable. Further, that the whistleblower, whom just so happens to be the long standing carer of 17 years and eldest son, is in for stitch up & persecution from the judiciary that will lead to a corrupt prison sentence, where the establishment closes ranks to protect itself using a bent judicial system to meter out what they would term as purged rehabilitation.
BIAS is unlawful in a court of law but here it exudes itself, brimming to overfull, and with impunity, where an 'admiralty administrative statute hearing' calling itself the 'court of protection' gives clear focus in the lack of FAIRNESS and IMPARTIALITY boasting it's BIAS without any fear.
My mother's vacant property, slowly degrading, stands now as a monument to the hypocrisy of UK INJustice, once renowned internationally, that's degenerated into a mafia run racket, committing financial rape on vulnerable people, where the rule of COMMON LAW has been tossed onto the scrap heap infavour of their own BIASED legalese of statutes conducting itself without IMPARTIALITY and FAIRNESS no doubt leading to an uprising of social unrest that the evidence is already here to see by the pockets of growing organisations of rebellion.
There are several criminals in this saga but our case would lay the main injustice allegations with 4 co conspiritors, that being
No1 SENIOR JUDGE DENZIL LUSH(master of the court of protection & the person with ultimate fudiciary responsibilty)
No2 Solicitor HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES(Deputy receiver whom clear evidence here points to him being the crook in the frame) &
No3 PHILIP MARK PELLING QC(Stitch up facilitator) and co ordinator as a NOMINATED Court of Protection Judge to remove any whistleblowers to prison by any crooked method using BIASED means, lacking impartiality and fairness with hearsay allowed, without prosecution witnesses in a tribunal lacking CONSENT & a requested Jury where your own representation has no right of audience and is thrown out.
No4 HONOURABLE JUSTICE PETER JACKSON who we have just added(25.09.2013) due to his inability to recognise the injustice and act HONOURABLY in fact quite the contrary JACKSON ignored the LIVING WILL that he authorised my mother's capacity to make and then he RING FENCED the property in a FRAUD cover up facilitated by LAND REGISTRY.
Mr Jackson has stated openly that “Start Quote [The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised” End Quote… but yet he also is stated on wikipiedia as a person who is a "master tactician (link)[who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not," where here these TYRANTS ("one who rules without law, looks to his own advantage rather than that of his subjects, and uses extreme and cruel tactics—against his own people as well as others") are stalking me, & my mothers house/home READ.
ALL four TYRANTS are paid from the racketeering products of the FRAUDULENT Court of Protection/NEGLECTION/CORRUPTION.

Email me-
READ Prison hearing transcript
READ WHAT really happened
Read what was served upon the Judge that in the transcript he admits to reading
1 READ statutory declaration of conditional acceptance of proceedings.
2 READ HIGH COURT NOTICE(7 pages) served by defense team.
3 READ skeleton case from the man.
4 READ contract tendered by statutory declaration.
watch the video statement by my representation to a radio station.
NOTE:There has been no published judgement I wonder WHY?


Back to top

PRIVACY NOTICE: Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the USA & United Kingdom Government/Courts also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photo's or any other "picture" art posted on here. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this site and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this site are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law. UCC 1-103 1-308


CONTACTS 25/09/2015
emails to
UK Blackpool 01253 675883
THAILAND MOB:+66617238348
SKYPE: mrmikeclarke

This is the website of an OPG patient with CAPACITY
Happier times 2008 brieflyand her son - carer.

A few words about us, our website and its slogan
"He who cares, wins!"

Mp3 recorded meeting of 1HOUR 18.07.11 that clearly shows the start of the process to steal my mothers home
06.10.11 OPG Rep: Meeting Recorded - LISTEN to it.(2HRS)

In June 1995 my mother Ann was 55 - After a long period of depression tried to end her life but tragically it ended her as we knew her & she only awoke from her coma 11 months later to find her new existance as a disabled woman needing 24hr care. Mike was from a Entreprenaur backround of Nightclubs Pubs, Tourism and Hotel life suddenly found himself to be that very carer at the age of 37.

After the obvious glaring failures committed by the ROYAL OLDHAM HOSPITAL a lawsuit case against them was launched in 1995 and some 6 years later in 2001 a compromised out of court settlement of damages was awarded in excess of £775,000. Mum, after 11months in hospital was discharged to a nursing home but the pain to the family of seeing her in there of only a few weeks brought about the decision to care for her at our own homes initially shared for a short period by my sister and I. In 1997 I took on the roll of full time carer and have done so to date, a period of 16 years.

The Website History -

us trying to enjoy life nowThis site has been launched because we emigrated permanent(March 2008) but find that mums estate is still trapped in the UK and as such our security back up when things are not right, of referring to our MP will be removed and thus our spanish option leaves us with a language barrior problem.
Therefore we decided to place the correspondence in the public domain to be judged by all. These link files to the left in column 1 are being documented in reverse order from whatever is todays date, in other words the latest current documents are on the top of the list and because the launch date of this site was only the 3rd April 2010 more and more information will be added over time as its our intention to expose the fundamental misgivings of the original intentions of the COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Anyone can see clearly if pouring over these documents an understanding of the where the name change came from with reference to NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION. We hope this website can also help others whom have serious problems with the OPG and its affiliated deputy's. Its my personal experience in many cases that money is horded away from the patient only to serve as inheritance to relatives whom played little or no role in the care of the affected patient ensuring the best possible existance to the end of their days. My own mother's award was predicted to have only lasted 10 years and her award was based on that prediction and its a testament to good care that her life expectancy is exceeding this prediction by far but that it would not do if constricted by the narrow brush approach of deputies hording vast sums of money away only to protect their long term fees and charges which are vastly in excess usually of what was supposed to have been laid down guidelines from the OPG.

We spent 6 years fighting a court case to get the award and then only to spend then next 10 years fighting the receiver to get it off him. Our lives are permanently blighted by the ongoing struggle in which the original award was supposed to solve. We cannot understand how, in 2010, a little known about corrupt UK government body can continue doing what they do in an unaccountable secret fashion, with lack of transparency and openness that the Cameron/Clegg government is currently promoting.

Though there is today (110410) still alot to resolve we do have a level of life to enjoy where we now live, in the Costa Del Sol, never to return again to the corrupt country from where we were born, THE UK unless of course its by the intimidatory way they are handling our finances and effectively continually trying to blackmail us into returning to the UK.


A testament to good care mum is still going strong at 70 years of age recently on the 9th August 2010 taken during a birthday meal in Benalmedina, Spain.


Born in Middleton, Manchester in 1940 the eldest one of seven mum fast grew up having to learn the rigors of life & at the age 16 she found love married and moved in with her new husband a journey the would last 36 years.

Mum never knew her real father he was missing at war presumed dead, when at the end of the war he returned only to find my mums mum, Grandma pregnant with another mans child whom then decided to leave. Mums real father also left and never returned, he went on to become a Director on the board of British Aerospace a person whom never came to see, find or even acknowledge his own 2 daughters.

With three children and now alone my mums mum, Grandma eventually found another love whom fathered a further four more children with her. My mother being the eldest of seven was very soon helping at an early tender age to look after and bring up her siblings virtually as an additional mother to them

After marriage at 16 mum at 19 gave birth to me, 3 years later my sister and one year later my brother. 3ofusOur family was VERY close. My sister and I bonded more and more over time. I remember all going out at night to our local for evenings all as one close family for many happy times. When I reached 16 I knew I was Gay I confided in my sister, mother and father but chose to pacify them all by saying I was bisexual and dating girls until the age of 26. For ten whole years I struggled to accept that I was never really bisexual at all and the pain that brought resulted in relentless up and down depressive symptoms, which on reflection were burdened on to my mother. She carried them times for me very much where suicide was a frequent consideration and she helped me thro to better times. This was a debt to my mother for which it became easier to repay when she needed me after her life changing accident in 1995.

At the age of 26 I suddenly became concious of the fact that I am what I am and that was the end of my relationships with women that tormented me from being the person I really was. From this point on depression for me became a thing of the past and I personally believe it was my mother whom helped carry me thro that ten year period in my life.

Our upbringing was of a working class family background on predominantly a council estate but that my father thro his business ideas directed several businesses giving me a true insight to that side of life. We were if you like, "bigger fish" in a small pond, respected by the neighbours and life was relatively good though there were lean times especially when my father went bankrupt, a period in his life I swore I'd never go thro.

In 1994 whilst I was directing my own four independant small businesses it became very apparent that my parents marriage was suffering and it was evident on their faces, eventually leading to divorce papers and seperation. It was at this point that mum started a period of depression that would lead up to her near fatal suicide attempt on 23rd June 1995 whilst in my presence in front of my house. I was 36. I only started to enjoy my life from the age of 26, 10 years I held dear, a very good and happy 10 years, but it was over!

Mum had deliberately ran under a 32 ton truck with an extra trailor attached at the rear, I really don't know how but she went under the middle section and only one of it's 18 wheels caught her left foot and caused some damage but unfortunately her skull was fractured. She then had continuous brain swelling over 24 hrs. Her coma lasted months and months, her prognosis was very poor and she was expected to die but her fighting spirit and prayers kept her alive.

I on the other hand lost all fighting spirit, I tryed to continue with my businesses for months but eventually it got to me with flashbacks and depression. Caring for mother slowly over time became the top priority not by choice but by nesseccity. Lives had changed for ever at a stroke June 1995.

I went on to spend an inordinate amount of time energy and fighting spirit to help mum to learn how to talk again and walk again against all odds given by doctors whom had given up. You can clearly see the results 15 years on by the pictures above of mum now 70. All this though has ruined my own life and existence as an entreprenaur and has robbed me of my dignity where personal wealth is concerned. If mum suddenly died I will be left homeless and destitute with nothing but yet I will of created lots of fat cat lawyers fees over the years with an inheritance bonus for waiting relatives. Is this right? I don't think so! Thus I now am hated and dispised by relatives and the courts because I am here fighting my corner for what I believe to be right, some justice for RELATIVE CARERS IN PRIVATE DAMAGES AWARDS.

Some peace at THE MOMENT in our new home, September 2010 but how long for? Back to top

Our VillaWhere would you rather live, be honest! Should mum be put in a old folks home, should she be in her rainy home town of Oldham, forced to live in her daughters back bedroom or do you just believe she's in the right place? This is what I am fighting to maintain for mum, what she truely deserves. Its her money to spend on how she wants to live, its not there for others to run up solicitors bills squabbling and it certainly ain't there for inheritance! How long our life will exist we do not know as the background currently is a concotion of corrupt statements trying to discredit my care for mum on a welfare and financial basis in order to deprive mum of her liberty living and cared for by me, her son abroad where she has capacity to choose where and with whom she wants to live with.

Golfing spectator ANN Taken today at the golf course 161210 mum wanted a taste of what the golfing fuss is all about would she get this sort of treatment in a home - I doubt it extremely.

JUST A NOTE FOR THE WEEK 09.06.2011 The money I now receive personally each week that is classed as expenses and as such mums deputy will not pay it as a wage because he said it would cost more for mum as she would pay tax on it. Well interesting that isn't it. Whilst normal folk whom do a job get a wage slip I don't and when I go to open a bank account they say well Mr Clarke where is your income and when I point to it they say thats not proper income Mr Clarke. Likewise how can one proceed proper with one's life for example how does one get a mortgage so as to have your own property over your head. If my mother lacks the capacity to recognise these things then why is it that she wants to display her concern by trying to gift her pproperty by way of JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY & why can't the British government along with its corrupt establishment see it all, or can they?. Its very obvious really whom the theives are in all this mess but who'd of thought that in 2011 in Britain, this would be going on, but it is!

The court of protection say well if your abroad you can apply to take charge of your mother affairs in that country and when you have done it apply to the UK courts to have the assets and cash released to you but they fail to recognise that in reality my mother has nothing to prove in another country why should she demonstrate to the UK government her capacity or lack of when they hold no jurisdiction in the country of her residence. They are in reality extending their jurisdiction without it being legal in any way. In the meantime their corrupt deputies do there dirty work whilst your outside of the UK. My god, so corrupt its unreal. I spoke to lawyers here in Spain they advised that the cost of an application would possibly exceed £3000 and only have a 50/50 chance of success. So where does one start? Not very nice to think that your own country is effectively screwing you over and taking advantage of the elderly whom clearly have the capacity to manage their own finances.

mums idea of a HOME!Taken today 9.06.11 this is what mum sees to be the type of "home" she wants to reside in till she dies. This is our current rented property in Spain that we have been negotiating to swap with mums UK property but as soon as mums deputy got wind of it he tried to sell her UK property for figures approaching £100,000 less than its value and this is the type of thing your up against!

F.A.C.T Families Against Court of Protection Theft is an organisation of those who have had problems dealing with the Court of Protection (CoP) and Office of Public Guardian (OPG) and are based in the UK. There has been 15,735 recorded complaints of abuse, fraud and corruption from Dec 2001- Dec 2010 (9 years) of the CoP and OPG in the UK.

There are over 50,000 people plus their families affected by these abuses of the Court of Protection, Office of Public Guardian and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) jurisdiction which is also part of the Court of Protection and many young adults who may have autism or aspergers have been wrongfully put under this jurisdiction depriving them from their liberties. Some people would most definitely dispute that these disorders should not even come under Mental Health and whether these young adults are even a threat to anyone.

The Court of Protection and the Office of Public Guardian are a Government run Court based in Archway Tower, Archway, London. It deals with property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity or who are unable to make decisions for themselves. Those deemed to lack capacity are many Elderly people who may suffer from Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Disabled People, Road Accident victims awarded compensation and even young adults who maybe Autistic or suffer from Asperger's Syndrome.

The Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian are responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of Enduring Powers of Attorney, and Lasting Powers of Attorney, appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.

However we are very concerned with the way it is run and from recent press such as

1.Daily Mail talks about abuses within the CoP and

2.Guardian 2005 talks about mishandling finances and 97 people having to be compensated for "bad investments and lost cash", they mean FRAUD, it shows how the CoP has been open to corruption, fraud> and abuse in legal terms understood as embezzlement.

As well as police corruption shown by Hoddesdon/Hertford police force as they protect the corrupt, accept bribes and even come to court and lie on Oath. Not to also mention corruption by all those we have reported to and are doing absolutely nothing. This includes SRA, Legal Ombudsman, Parliamentary Ombudsman, all our MPs, House of Lords and all our police forces. It is beyond a national DISGRACE!

Further articles to show Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian Corruption:

3.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse (NASGA)

4.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse Blog

5.Canadian Public Guardian worker imprisoned for Fraud

6.Another Canadian Public Guardian worker imprisoned for Fraud for embezzling $1.2 million in 12 years

7.UK Court of Protection Forum for Victims claiming CoP abuse and fraud

8.UK Court of Protection being investigated

9.UK Court of Protection involved in Mass Fraud

10.Estate of Denial website claim UK CoP involved in Mass Fraud

11.UK Mass Fraud Anajinn Blog Concerns

12.UK Elderly man embezzled £549,000 by Deputy Solicitors Firm, Judkins Solicitors and Judge Henderson cover up fraud

13.Why would Judge Launcelot Henderson also known as Henderson J cover up the fraud? Because he is part of the Court of Protection

14.UK Mark Neary 20 year old autistic son abuse under Deprivation of
Liberty Order of the Court of Protection

15.Anna Raccoon concerns over Steven Neary case

16.UK Families Against Court of Protection Blog

17.UK Families Against Court of Protection on Facebook

18.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse also on Facebook

19.Ellee Seymour talks about UK Government plans for a Review

20.UK Mark Reeves Case-Road Accident Victim awarded £2.5 million compensation goes to Court fees! They mean SFA (Solicitors Fraud Association)

21.Daily Mail Low IQ woman case

22.Anna Raccoon previous CoP Employee concerns

23.More Anna Raccoon

24.UK Carer for his mother concerns-moved to Spain to escape corruption

25.BBC File on 4

26.BBC File on 4 Documentary

27.Demanding new Prime Minister to Investigate on Your Freedom Forum

28.Telegraph reports

29.The Independent reports

30.Telegraph reports on Autistic Pianist

31.BBC Tips for Power of Attorneys/Lasting Power of Attorneys to avoid the Court of Protection although CoP can overrule these. We did say they are CORRUPT!

32.UK Human Rights Blog Concerns

33.Ellee Seymour Concerns

34.UK Indigo Jo Blogs

35.Advocates for National Guardian Reform (ANGR) Victims and their Stories

36.CBS News catch onto Mass Fraud in Public Guardian America

37.The National Organization to End Guardianship Abuse (NOTEGA)

38.Another Public Guardian worker in America imprisoned for Fraud. When will the UK Government start arresting those involved in the UK Mass CoP Fraud?

39.FACT are very aware of Will and Property Deed Forgery! NHS Yvette Adams Abuse

40.NHS Fraud Louise Tomkins Case

41.NHS Fraud Angolia Dephew Case

42.Directors of Will making firm imprisoned for Fraud-Nicholas Butcher and David Nash Case

43.Corrupt UK Government only change legislation if they receive payment!

44.Lee Gilliland case concern reported by the Telegraph

45.This is Bristol also talks about Lee Gilliland case

46.David Cameron and Parliaments concerns over Privacy Laws ie secretive Court of Protection

47.Daily Mail talks about relationship of gagging orders, injunctions being abused in the Courts especially by the Court of Protection

48.John Hemming MP Court of Protection must be reformed reported by The Telegraph

49.Three Cheers for John Hemming MP by Alex Massie

50.Journalists have Gagging orders banning them reporting/investigating Court of Protection victims cases otherwise will be imprisoned for Contempt of Court

51.Neil Barker's Case

52.Ellee Seymour mentions protest on Fri 29th April 2011

Flaws in the Court of Protection (CoP) were highlighted in a negative press campaign last autumn 2010. The CoP and the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) shared more than 4,000 complaints about its operations over the last two years. It is still being accused of mismanaging £2.7 billion it controls and which is held on behalf of those who no longer have capacity (Ps). Critics claim that it holds the money in a Bank of England account paying 0.5% a year rather than at High Street banks which would provide rates of three per cent. As inflation takes hold it leaves families with an income deficit needing to dig into the capital set aside for a lifetime of care.

The newspapers' campaign An eye catching headline in the Mail on Sunday described the CoP as "The Secret Court of Living Hell". Case histories investigated in the newspaper's campaign included: •An application to the CoP for money to pay fees for residential care taking too long to be processed. P's house sale proceeds were paid into an account held by the court. The money took five months to come through and was £10,000 short of the £35,000 which was required. The aggrieved relative said he was never able to speak to the same person twice about the matter. •P was awarded £1.6 million. When her father died an application was made by her mother to take over from him as the person authorised to run P's financial affairs. The fees came to around £42,000 for solicitors, barristers and accountants. •P's house sale proceeds were transferred into the wrong account. The mistake was only discovered when there was a request to pay P's care home fees. •An administration charge of £4,100 to access £5,800 out of the £90,000 held by the CoP. P, a former solicitor suffering from bi polar disorder, complained requests for money which were supposed to take six weeks were taking five months and that the payments received were less than asked for. •The father of an eight year old boy who had been awarded £4.2 million as a result of medical negligence was accused of being abusive to an official from the CoP on a home visit although nobody had visited him at their home.

There were complaints in particular about delays, expense, the long and obscure court forms, inefficiency and that the court was a remote entity serving itself. These were accelerated by the press attaching links to the articles censuring the Court. In The Mail alone 450 further accusations of incompetence followed on from one article. Internet forums posted comments that it sent bullying letters and treated relations like criminals. Saga magazine quoted children's author Helen Bateman whose husband was in a coma after an accident: "It is an alien, intrusive, time consuming and costly institution which was completely out of tune with what we were going through".

Court of Protection Rules Committee's Review In November the then Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, responded to the concerted attacks by the press. A General Election was on the horizon and the Court was being described as an unresponsive Labour monolith working in secret and grinding its users down. Mr Straw asked Sir Mark Potter, the then President of the Family Division, to appoint a Rules Committee to investigate and recommend changes. The committee was chaired by Mr Justice Charles and Mrs Justice Proudman.

The committee met four times in the spring of 2010 and published a report in July 2010. There was recognition of the need for new court forms to be available as quickly as possible. They were to be custom made for the different types of application to avoid containing the lengthy screeds of unnecessary information the original universal forms require. Better explanatory notes are recommended to be attached to the forms as the current ones have led to confusion. Clearer forms would lower the 80% refusal rate for applications received between January 2008 and December 2009 to deal with property and welfare decisions on behalf of the mentally vulnerable. Forty per cent of applications are made by people without professional support. This is a failure in communication and assists those who fear the Court is composed of civil servants and lawyers busy talking to themselves while failing to provide a simple application process. Fortunately the new forms will be road tested in pilot schemes. Their success will depend on using simple English aimed at non-professionals.

A further recommendation is that court officers, rather than judges, should deal with applications concerning non-contentious property and affairs. Previously nominated officers were trained to deal with routine applications and there was lobbying for their return. There is provision for judges to review those decisions and it will make running the Court easier. Other recommendations of the Rules Committee address speeding up and simplifying procedure in response to the complaints of delay.

A key recommendation is that there should be no change in the rules concerning access to proceedings by the public. When and whether the Court should sit in public or permit its proceedings to be made public will be decided in each case by the judge. In March 2010 the Court of Appeal had already handed down a judgement on the application by the press to be permitted access to a hearing concerning Derek Paravicini, described as a human iPod. He is an autistic, high earning pianist living in sheltered accommodation, needing 24 hour care and unable to manage his finances. The press had been agitating against the Court's closed hearings in a high profile campaign. It was held that article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights covered access to information at a court hearing and there could be no blanket exclusions. The Court of Appeal held that decisions on press access should be within the discretion of the judge hearing the case. The Rules Committee followed the case law but decided against blanket open access.

Scrutiny by the public In May 2010 an open judgment was handed down by Sir Nicholas Wall in DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS [2010] EWHC 1217 concerning a woman aged 55 who had learning difficulties and an overwhelming fear of hospitals and medical treatment. She was deemed not to have mental capacity and unable to make a decision about her treatment. The President ruled that she could be given a drug in a glass of Ribena at her home and detained afterwards on a ward for treatment of cancer of the uterus. Fair reporting in this case though did include Mencap's support for the court's life sustaining decision This re-opened the continuing debate in the press about the court having sweeping powers handed to it by the Labour government that were not open to scrutiny and openness. Previously decisions about life and death , sterilisations and abortions were made in public and could be reported by the media. Profound questions as to when the State can intervene in private life were aired. Fears were voiced that paternalistic doctors would combine with judges to make vital decisions behind closed doors, thus eroding the rights of the individual. The media continue to oppose blocked access on the basis that it more appropriate for countries whose leaders do not like their authority to be questioned.

Another press campaign led to the naming of a local authority which had treated a vulnerable person and their relations in a high handed manner without authority. The latest judgement released to the press concerned "birth control by force". Mr Jusice Bodey in August 2010 criticised a Midlands council who wanted a married woman aged 29 with an IQ of 53 to be sedated, taken from her home and have birth control imposed on her against her will. The plan to prevent her having children he held had shades of social engineering. There would need to be police involvement and contraception under restraint which he could not authorise under the circumstances The Court does not have to handle these types of cases often. Public decision making should be encouraged. Ethical life changing decisions ought to reflect current social, rather than legal, values. Keeping people informed reassures them that judges are in tune with the current moral climate and not remote elderly beings living in a world of their own.

Court of Protection's First Report In June 2010 the Court published its first report, covering its performance between October 2007 and January 2010. The target for an oral hearing within 6 weeks was met in 53% of applications compared with the target of 75%. The Senior Judge explains the shortfall in performance by insufficient Judges. He hoped the appointment of three full time judges in 2010 would help meet targets. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 which created the new Court of Protection did not provide for deputies (part time judges). Full time judges had to be brought in from the regions to cover the London work. The five regional centres were designed to take the hearing centres to the client .This had an impact of the regions that deal with 60% of the work. A more flexible system would be to amend the statute to provide for deputies. They could be drafted in to help with the work flow and be a pool of experienced potential permanent judges.

Applications were analysed. There were 40,000 applications concerning property and affairs and 95% of them did not require court attendance. Forms to apply for a power of attorney had been reduced from 25 pages to 12. There were 2,800 personal and welfare applications with a refusal rate of 80%. There were 13 Deprivation of liberty applications over an eight month period. The general rate of applications was averaging at 1600 per month.

Complaints were addressed. There were 1,672 complaints made about the Court (excluding ones about the OPG taking combined complaints to 4000). These divided into 25% about judicial decisions, 15% about the cost of proceedings, 15% about administrative errors, and 30% about the length of the process and delays. The rate of complaints reduced in the last 6 months and the Senior Judge credits the Court being integrated into HMCS in April 2009 as having had a positive effect.

Performance indicators were divided into three periods of time. There was an improvement in the proportion of applicants contacted within 20 days of receipt of the application (92%), and of those applications meeting the target for paper directions within 16 weeks (77%) but for those within 20 weeks underperforming by 14%. 59% of applications were heard within 6 weeks, a poor performance the Senior Judge hopes will be improved upon. Replies to correspondence within 10 working days were off target by 20% and down to 75%.

Continuing criticisms The report did not stem criticism. BBC's File on Four, broadcast on 27th of July, focused on new complaints. Parents of disabled children who became 18 had to apply at great expense to be deputies to manage their children's meagre finances and thought their particular situation had been overlooked. A compensation award invested at 0.5% interest instead of 4.5%, the Halifax rate of interest at the time, was bitterly attacked by an accident victim who estimated he had lost £50,000. Another accident victim was awarded £1.5 million and wanted to know the number of hours charged for by her deputy and after 3 months had not been told. The charity Elder Abuse was receiving constant calls to its helpline about fees for unnecessary work and the Court approving too many bills in excess of the £1100 capped rate. Delay in preventing financial abuse was highlighted. The niece of a hospital patient with dementia had taken £300,000 out of P's accounts and conveyed P's home into joint names. It took 3 months to cut off the niece's access to the accounts and no sanctions were taken against her. The Court was attacked for being slow and lenient. The programme concluded that lobbyists like the Court and the public do not.

It is worth remembering the previous Court was also vilified. A Parliamentary Ombudsman Report in 2005 noted poor staff training, high staff turnover, and serious mistakes in managing clients' money. There were poor investments and lost cash leading to compensation claims. Staff often never replied to letters and took months to sort anything out. When complaints mounted up internal memos were written which were "staggering in their arrogance". Overall the Court is trying to improve. It does have a challenging client base and a large volume of work. Some of the delays maybe due to lawyers not using its emergency provisions (see Urgent Applications in the Court of Protection, Pierce and Jackson (Jordans)). It is admitting shortcomings and attempting to adapt quickly. There are now 2,000 applications per month. Previously the four judges based at Archway could not keep up with the volume of work. Although three new judges were appointed in Spring 2010 none of them had sat as judges before their appointment. Meanwhile two experienced Judges will be leaving by spring 2011. It is likely the Senior Judges optimism for future efficiency is misplaced and there will be more delay.

The media have a grievance about removing its right of access, at time when the culture is towards more open justice and will continue with criticism campaigning to get into the hearings. The pressure group Families Against Court of Protection Theft set up by relations who were unhappy with the CoP is also a vocal critic but has a limited ability to solve the problems of others. Website content such as the OPG's pledge to acknowledge a complaint within two working days, unless it does so, will fuel the flames.

It is hoped the new forms, produced with the benefit of the HMCS's drafting experience, will be an improvement on the OPG's previous efforts and will be comprehensible and user friendly. It has been a very bumpy start. The basement interest rates need to be addressed. The tenor of past complaints has been of faceless bureaucrats making incomprehensible decisions, then failing to communicate about them. Focus should be on running an efficient, responsive, problem solving service for the most vulnerable. For many, the Court is still not serving the most vulnerable but adding to their problems.

Back to top

Mother/patient - Ann Clarke The Patient

Having emigrated to Spain in March 2008 I just want to feel free, normal & happy. Not overshadowed by the british government. Human again & not repressed. My son would like his dignity restored not to be discriminated against as a relative carer but to be treated with equality and be paid fair like others. My money should not be in pounds but in euros and because of this its value since moving to Spain has devalued by 80,000 Euro. I should not be forced to live off an exchange rate by the British Government. My liberty and freedom of choice should be respected.

I suffer from dysphasia

People with dysphasia may have difficulty talking, understanding "not me", listening "not me", writing "not me" or doing numeral calculations "not me". They may be mildly or severely affected "not me". Everyday tasks, such as shopping or answering the phone "not me", may be impossible.
People with the condition can

"think clearly and know what they're feeling, and their intellect is maintained."

They're often mistakenly thought to be drunk or mentally confused "not me". Read 2010 The CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT report on me thats just been delivered and its the second report in 10 years that confirms my capacity. So why am I being treated like a dog by the British Government?
A 4 page report by
Dr Hana Al-Hamar 22.05.2001 that was the result of a 4hour examination.
Listen to Dr Hana's comments June 2001.
Dr Khan from the Lord Chancellors Office, 1 hour recording that is unbelievable as to why they keep mum in the Court of Protection 05.09.2001
The latest report in November 2011 Read 31 pages

& Mike
The Son Carer & Author-51

Carer Son - Mike Clarke Read CV

Michael's RANT!

The carer's work is never done and neither is it paid for!. Discriminated against as a relative carer there is no equality! It's also a 24hr attention span thats needed. I think sometimes, "I'd like to go to the beach for a day but there is'nt enough free time!" We think we'd like a weekend alone visit Morroco or Gibralter but again the tie is there and you can't. When family visit they think they're on holiday so not only are you still waiting on the patient you are also waiting on the family. I sometimes wish they'd say "hey Mike!" we're here you get off for the weekend and enjoy yourselves but "no!".

Treated like hired help but without pay, by your own family is sometimes how it feels. You also feel you have no home, no place of your own and people say well it was your choice but really it were'nt. My mother asked for my care and attention, how could I refuse. My life has been blighted overshadowed, not my own and for what, where is my salary for what I do. Not a wage in sight. Discriminated CARER! Family carer, so you get a benefit that amounts to nothin, but yet outside care can demand £12 an hour. WHY? When a patient is awarded so much money "FOR CARE", why is the family carer not paid his due's. Why is he/she paid a benefit below minimum wage and yet the government allow it to go on.

Whilst fat cat Lawyers, Judges and Courts take their own fat cat fees and wages for their intervention but yet the carer is treated like shit on the end of their shoes! TRUE.

There's something wrong with the system. I calculate for my care over 14 years I am owed £12 per hour for at the very least 14 hours a day 365 days a year 14 years, work that out? £800,000! But if you were just recognised as a working person on minimum wage of £6 that alone would of been £400,000? Whilst other family have built up their worth in property I have not been able to. Its been a mission just trying to work out what I can sell or scrape together each year for an annual holiday but who really gives a shit?

Well I can tell you absolutely no one, accept the people who are in the same boat watching others steal from their relatives estates without transparency, only in secret, accounting to no-one but themselves.

IT HAS TO STOP! The UK government needs to address this with urgency. Someone, somewhere, someday will lose it, mind wise, and someone will die, probably from the pure frustrations that must be building in these people, listened to by no one and I mean no one, or caring about "THE CARERS". Probably because we are a small insignificant minority, but we are gathering strength.

An investigation into a complaint I made on the 4th February 2010 lasted 7 long months, what on earth is going on? I'm sure a murder investigation don't take that long! - Investigation completed the day after I published this statement read the 3 lines Then upon asking for a complete full copy of the investigation passed to legal department whom refused a copy on the grounds of section 40 of the data protection act protecting others.

If I had my time over again knowing what I know now I would have had to refuse my mothers request even though that would of broken my heart. It's took its toll on me over the years but I really blame the UK government for this not my mother whom with all her "so-called" lack of capacity seems to be fully intact to me of which I hold Clinical Neuropsycologists reports to confirm her capacity that have been largely ignored. One day I do believe someone will do something about it and stop this barbarrick inhumane treatment of the people whom CARE the most about the patients.

Back to top


Damages were awarded for the patients care but its that very standard of care that drops when families become involved because the system is that busy trying to stop famalies having any involvement with the care and money or at least them are the grounds they operate on yet in reality they are protecting their own long term fees whilst under that cover.

The carer whom is caring has no real access and no real say usually because other family whom are protecting their inheritance tend to side with the receivers or courts or worse won't get involved.

There was to my recollection, no money awarded for inheritance and there also was no money awarded for exorbitant fees and charges, so whats gone wrong with the system?

CARE and carers PAY was what the money was awarded for!

In our case one can take note that I personally did the first care of over 5 years before any money was awarded, living off benefits in a 1 bedroomed flat with me sleeping on a sofa! I sometimes think, and my mother the patient also agrees, I should sue her in the courts for back pay. I wonder?

Its ironic when we go out to a restaurant that the patient can order fillet steak but the carer can only afford beans on toast unless the patient issue's a handout. That's how its fealt for me over 15 years just living off handouts, no respect, no dignity, no nothing, treated like dirt when we should be rewarded better than the fat cat lawyers, judges & inheritance hunters etc.

I recently pointed out to the receiver HUGH JONES about the fact there is no wage and he said yes there is its paid in the account and I said its never been pointed out to me its a wage and if it ever was really a wage why has it not been taxed. Fiddling the state out of a tax paid wage I accused him off, with all the cuts that the government are making why are they not stopping carers from claiming benefits when high damages awards have been made to pay for care where that carer can then pay TAX! There has been a constant inbalance in the living standard of the patient to the carer whom as I pointed out that at the time of mums accident in 1995 I was living off an income of £1100 a week from one of my four businesses at that time which was all thrown away in the ensueing disaster in order to prioritise care for mum for free!.

So whats been the point in of it all salvaging the care of one life to ruin your own whilst FAT CAT lawyers and inheritence hunters all get the richer over time. Who is going to take notice of this corrupt system and the discriminatory inequalitys that are blatantly evident today in 2011 for private care damages that were awarded to pay for just that? CARERS! I recently complained to the EHRC The Equality and Human Rights helpline about this very matter and here you read their reply, "The issue that you have regarding care for your mother without payment is not likely to fall within the remit of the Equality Act. It appears that the fact that you are a relative means that you are not entitled to any of the payment award that your mother received to assist with her care.

This is not an equality issue and therefore, we cannot provide any further advice. " Now I ask you? does that not stink of discrimination and where I ask is the equality in that? Its obviously legal in the UK to discriminate against relative carers, no problem at all!

Manchester / Munby Judgement R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE L & ORS : R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE R & ANOR (2001) QBD (Admin) (Munby J) 26/9/2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - FAMILY LAW - HUMAN RIGHTS JUDICIAL REVIEW : FOSTER CARERS : RELATIVES : FRIENDS : SHORT TERM : LONG TERM : BOARDING-OUT ALLOWANCE : PAYMENTS : FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION : DEPENDENCY : S.8, S.17, S.22, S.23 AND S.26 CHILDREN ACT 1989 : ACCOMMODATION : PLACEMENTS : RESIDENCE ORDERS : LOOKED AFTER : LOCAL AUTHORITY : FOSTER PLACEMENT (CHILDREN) REGULATIONS 1991 SI 1991/;910 : FINANCIAL REPORTS : FOSTERING ALLOWANCES : NATIONAL FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION : NFCA : FOSTER CARE FINANCE : FCF : CARE PROCEEDINGS : WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS : IRRATIONALITY : HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 1950 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : ECHR : ART.8 : RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE : ART.14 : PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION : LEGITIMATE AIMS : PRESSING SOCIAL NEED : PROPORTIONALITY : NECESSITY A local authority’s policy that financially discriminated against foster carers who were related to the children they fostered was unlawful. Two joined applications for judicial review of the respondent council’s policy to pay those short-term foster carers who were friends or relatives of a fostered child at a significantly lower rate than other foster carers. Both applications concerned children who were looked after within the meaning of ss.22 and 23 Children Act 1989. In the first application, the maternal grandparents of three children were the children’s long-term foster carers and the children remained with the grandparents after full care orders were made. In the second application, the children were placed with their older half-sister when full care orders were made after an independent social work assessment. The issue was the legality of the policy. The applicants submitted: (i) the council’s policy was a financial disincentive to family members being foster carers and used their sense of moral obligation to compel them to accept a grossly inadequate level of financial support which was lower than the level determined by the council as necessary for the maintenance of other foster children of like age; (ii) the policy was an attempt to apply financial pressure on family members to move away from local authority support; (iii) the policy was discriminatory within Art.14 European Convention on Human Rights and failed adequately to implement the council’s obligation to promote the right to respect for family life guaranteed by Art.8 of the Convention; (iv) the policy was an attempt to transfer the financial burden of looked-after children away from the council and was an abuse of the council’s dominant position in relation to foster parents and children; and (v) the policy excluded any flexibility to allow payment of the normal fostering allowances to relative foster carers in appropriate cases. HELD: (1) Section 23(2)(a) of the Act left the framework for providing for fostering allowances to the council’s discretion. That discretion had to be: (a) formulated and implemented to allow flexibility according to the needs of the individual children concerned; (b) exercised in light of the aim of the statutory framework without reliance on irrelevant considerations, without disregarding relevant principles, without being perverse and without conflicting with any duties within the framework; and (c) formulated and exercised to safeguard adequately the right to respect for family life in Art.8 of the Convention and to avoid discrimination in breach of Art.14 of the Convention. (2) The applicants’ submissions that imputed less than worthy motives to the council were not accepted. (3) The council’s policy was driven by the principle that it was undesirable to create a financial dependency on it if that would disincline a friend or relative to apply for a s.8 residence order. That was an entirely legitimate consideration and was entirely in accordance with the key principle in s.26(3) of the Act, namely that all appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that children were placed with their families as far as possible. (4) The council’s policy was unlawful for four reasons: (i) it imposed an arbitrary and inflexible cash limit on the amounts that could be paid to relative foster carers; (ii) it fixed the level of payments to relative foster carers at such a low level that there was an inevitable a conflict with the welfare principle and the council’s statutory duty; (iii) it was Wednesbury unreasonable; and (iv) it fundamentally discriminated against short-term relative foster carers and the children in their care. None of those objections were met by the legitimacy of the council’s objective. (5) The council’s obligation under both the Act and the Convention was to take all appropriate positive steps to ensure that children should live with their families. Differential treatment based on family relationships or which had an additional impact on family members could only be justified by counterbalancing factors of a compelling nature. If the council’s policy failed when tested against classic public law principles, it inevitably followed that it would fail to pass muster under the Convention. In any event, the policy failed to meet the key Convention tests of necessity and proportionality, thereby breaching Arts.8 and 14 of the Convention. Application allowed. Roger McCarthy QC instructed by Green & Co for the applicants. Ernest Ryder QC and Yvonne Coppel instructed by and for the council. LTL 26/10/2001 : (2002) 1 FLR 43 : (2002) ACD 284 : Times, December 10, 2001 Judgment: Approved subject to editorial corrections - 39 pages Document No.: AC0101975
Reference link
Solicitors link
Full Judgement link

Meet Michael on You Tube
click here

HE WHO CARES, SHOULD WIN, and eventually will! There's a saying in spain, "poco en poco", little by little.

Home is where the heart is and in 2011 this is our home

Great Grandson Jack

Thro all the family trauma a new addtion, JACK meets great grandma on 031010. The family get together at a pub for the afternoon was nothing short of a very tense situation.

My sister Angela wants to force her mother back to the UK to live at her house against her mothers consent and after failing to gain her consent and some very derrogatory exchange of texts published here, the following statements were made by the Angela CLAN.

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister Angela and my brother Kevin

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's husband David Platt

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Danielle Jones

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah Jones

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah's, boyfriend Paul Collins

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my brother's wife Tracey Clarke

In defence of the above I and others made the following statements:-

Response 091010 Read A statement made by Michael 6 pages

Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend Cheryl Cavanagh 5 pages

Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend of 35 years Stephen Power

Response 031010 Read A statement made by ex partner of 6 years Paul Moorby

Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years David Owen-Scott

Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Jonathon Goulding

Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Brenda Swain

Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Margaret Davies 3 pages

golfing lunch 161210Out in golfers company for lunch mum wanted to sample some of what the golfers get up to.



Another brick in the wall

Michael Clarke
Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful.
The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation.
The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year 2011, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts.
In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes.
Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers.
The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England.
This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.
Like · · Share · Unfollow Post · 19 November at 14:15
Seen by 8 Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh, Peter Hofschröer and 2 others like this. ..
Tatiana Ladislas von Montegatz Michael Clarke could you please explain if this information could be referred to the Court of Protection and be used? 20 November at 03:58 via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke yes IT can but in practice the courts have an habit of ignoring you as in my case 20 November at 08:18 · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh fraud courts, corrupt system. Corrupt Queen who really don't care about us. More interested in donating money abroad but will watch her own people, elderly, disabled abused in this way and do nothing. 59 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 2 ..
Michael Clarke Absolute agreement on that 57 minutes ago · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh It's about time we had no Queen if she cannot do anything for her country or her people. What is she there for? For us to fund and pay her bills! 56 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke EXACTLY it is... SHE IS a waste of time and money 55 minutes ago · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh So are MPs! what have they done for us victims? We are their constituents! They don't care about us! Waste of our money too! 52 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Also police what they are there for if they can't arrest criminals and can't deal with our cases. We do not need them if the corrupt pay them to not investigate, same with IPCC, Law Society, SRA, Ombudsmen, all waste of taxpeyers money. None do their jobs. A disgraceful country this is! 50 minutes ago via mobile · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke MY MP GORDON MARSDEN is a complete waste of space the number of run in s I ve had with him and that was just to get an appointment... he has done nothing he I believe is scared of the corrupt lot and prefers to sweep it under the carpet.... 47 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly same as me with my MP Robert Halfon. The abuse I had from his secretary just to get an appointment. First he was dealing with the case, then went silent, then wouldn't talk to me and I had abuse. He even ran to John Hemming MP to make false stories about me. Even sweep it under the carpet like they all do or more likely bribed by the corrupt! 40 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Whilst MPs are getting second homes, our homes and goods are being stolen. They don't care about us! 38 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke bribed by the corrupt! NOW THAT RINGS TRUE to me in every sense.... as time has gone on and on the more and more corrupt the entire state is uncovered... I've got to the stage where I NOW BELIEVE THERE IS NO JUSTICE ON OFFER. 38 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke there is only the OPTION OF REVOLUTION... 37 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke SO I PERSONALLY have joined the anti government protesting and rallies groups associated with bringing down the state as the only option to us... these bastards need to pay the ultimate price for their GREED. 35 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh All victims are having the same problems with their MPs, not just you and me. They do nothing for any of us! How many more victims do we need for them to ever do anything?!! Therefore if our MPs can't do anything for you and me and other of their constituents. What are they there for? 34 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke THAT IS WHY I USED THE COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST OUR SOLICITORS PANNONES AND HUGH JONES... if it were not worth the paper its written on then why did they spend £70,000 on corrupt bent courts and bent barristers and bent judges to try and stop me with false harassment charges to gain fraudulent injunctions??? 30 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke The judicial system is out of CONTROL just like the identical GOVERNMENT with its BENT banking system built to rob and steal from the poor SLAVES... US! We got to put a stop to it all for the sake of CHILDREN. 27 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly my suffering has paid for corrupt solicitors Amber Melville-Brown, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Lorna Skinner's lovely homes and many more corrupt ...See More 6 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke SOMETIME's you have got to fight fire with FIRE so in other words if they condone robbery, theft fraud and violence in the form of coercion to corrupt courts with forced prison, then it is only right fair and equal that this should be matched by equal forces i.e., VIOLENCE! 9 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Agreed it's about time we took corrupt solicitors, judges and police homes and stole all their goods and see if nothing happens to us like them and for Law Society, SRA to see nothing is wrong & concluded at looking at all victims evidence 'they cannot see anything wrong, case closed, file closed on this matter' 3 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke

. 22 November 2013 at 16:12 Dear Mr. Alderman: The email exchange below is self-explanatory. If you were not aware of ACPO's Memorandum of Understanding with the Law Society, I shall be pleased to provide you with a copy of it. You may find it interesting to follow the internet links provided in the correspondence below. I can also provide you with information on fraud and corruption which has never been investigated by police. One reason for this (besides the agreement with the Law Society) is that, in some cases, police are party to racketeering or cover-ups, and another reason may be that police authorities are not staffed with personnel trained to a high enough standard in forensic accounting to be able to do the job of investigating white collar crime. For example, Greater Manchester Police - the second largest force in the UK - only has one officer trained and experienced enough to investigate white collar fraud. Obviously, serious organized crime affects all UN nations, and the UK is party to a legally binding UN convention to fight corruption. However, perhaps for the above reasons, this is not being done sufficiently, and therefore warrants serious and immediate attention. From what I have experienced, alleged responsiblity for crime, policing and justice in the UK seems to be spread across many ministries and ministers, and also be divided up among police, including ACPO, Sir Paul Stephenson, the Special Crime Unit, and various police authorities. When approached with the very serious matter of organized white collar crime, all parties refuse to investigate or intervene. Most just ignore the public and do not respond at all. I am wondering if the Serious Fraud Office, like the government itself, is dictated to by ACPO, and if it will therefore also refuse to investigate white collar crime and corruption? Referring a complainant back to their own police authority does not work because these authorities have already refused to log complaints of fraud, which is why complainants have attempted to escalate the matters - to no avail. There is absolutely nowhere that a person can go to get police to act. It is not possible to escalate the problem because there is absolutely no accountability by anyone in government. I am aware that an arrest of six solicitors was made recently, but there are many more involved in crimes such as fraudulent land title transfer, insurance fraud, and racketeering through the Court of Protection, and the Office of the Public Guardian, among other things. It is unfortunate that you are answerable to The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve, as he has never responded to these concerns at all. I wonder why the government is organized in such a way. Perhaps it is to spread the responsiblity so widely that nobody can be held accountable. This would seem to me to be the reason for it. The Rt. Hon. Nick Herbert talks about establishing a new Economic Crime Agency, but his department has written to say they will not intervene in individual cases, when they have already been advised of crime and corruption among police, and that nobody will investigate. Nobody can escalate a complaint to anyone as everything goes down a dead end street. There is absolutely no accountability by any public authority in the UK. At least, perhaps with Police Commissioners, someone will exert some authority over police and make them accountable to government and the people. There is a brick wall at every ministry and agency door in the UK, which is why there is now pressure on Europe to intervene. It would seem, from the press, that Europol will be involving themselves in British policing. It is unfortunate, but the country has brought it on itself by not adhering to the UN convention. Her Majesty's government is fragmented and not one person, with the exception of a handful of MPs and Lords shows any concern, or takes any action against the corruption that exists and is fostered among legal professionals, police, and the judiciary.. All are in denial. The Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke has been invited to ask for evidence of judicial corruption, and he does not. I wonder why. I don't know what the purpose of the British Prime Minister is. He should be taking the lead, instead of hobnobbing with media monopoly players. Nobody has any accountability to anyone. No doubt it won't be long before the British join Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Yemen, and the rest, and take to the streets. The British have become a seriously oppressed nation because of all the do-nothings in government. It is no wonder that the government has been buying riot gear for the military. Perhaps they are expecting the Storming of the Bastille. I look forward to receiving your comments, and your request for information on the crimes and corruption. Yours sincerely, Bernard Jenkin, MP Public Administration Committee Westminster, UK Dear Mr Jenkin As you can see from the information following this email, I have been alerting authorities since at least 2011 about the police's fraudulent crime figures. Heaven knows how long others have been alerting them. You will also find reference to police fudging figures in two new books by ex police officer, Stephen Hayes: XD0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385045105&sr=8-1&keywords=fifty+shades+of+black+ %27n+blue Jil Matheson is the National Statistician. I believe she has been concerned since I advised her, but nothing has been done by government, with the exception of your own efforts, despite the matter being mentioned in parliament, and despite there also being several newspaper articles about police dereliction of duty since 2011, indicating that police only selectively investigate reported crimes, and most often refuse to record them and issue a crime log number. The financial bonus culture for any public servant makes Britain a laughing stock, but it is worse, when we think that it takes place within police. ACPO is behind all of this nonsense, and is a self-serving old boys' club that should be disbanded. Why on earth would the government not broaden the scope of HM Inspector of Constabularies? Wouldn't that be the most logical move? Obviously, something smells rotten. You should be aware of the fact that many MPs, including those on select committees, are deleting emails from the public, which are respectful and contain intelligence, WITHOUT READING THEM. They are doing it to many, many people, and Ministers are doing it too. It is every bit as serious a corruption problem as police ignoring reports of crime. I know of two people who have tried to report MURDERS and are being ignored by West Yorkshire Police - one of the worst police forces in the country for alleged corruption. They have approached oversight bodies and central government, and are similarly ignored. They have been fighting for justice in the matter for many years. May I emphasise that there are thousands of Britons who have been fighting for justice and police investigations into serious crimes, most notably sophisticated white collar, and yet both police and government ministers ignore them. We have reached the conclusion that police and government are part of the organised crime ring. What other conclusion would a person draw? Something is seriously wrong and, if Mr. Maude is concerned about public servants giving service, he should first examine who is blocking and deleting emails throughout government and public service, and under whose authority they are doing so. The problem of MPs and ministers deleting emails without reading them has been reported to select committees but, unfortunately, several select committee members, including Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge, are culprits themselves. The Public Accounts committee has acknowledged the concern but has no intention of doing anything about it, despite the fact that the culprits obviously do not represent good value for money for the British taxpayer. Perhaps we should have drawn this matter to your attention? Actually, I think some of us may have. The situation involving officials ignoring intelligence (particularly about organised crime) from the public is so bad that concerned citizens now broadcast this matter widely to officials in Europe and beyond, because it is corruption, and this corruption belies the fact that the UK is signatory to international conventions against transnational serious organised crime and against corruption. We feel that many MPs and ministers are fraudulently holding office, when they simply either block emails from the public or delete them without reading them, besides which they do nothing about the problems, even after reading the emails. Mr. Cameron and Mr. Clegg obviously couldn't care less, and it will be their undoing. Theresa May is even worse. The people have had enough. Britain is the weak link in international crime fighting. As you know, police had received information from Toronto Police eighteen months ago regarding Operation Spade, and did nothing with it. No arrests were made in the UK. Britain let the team down, as usual. Britain does not deserve to be a G20 or G8 member, and Kenneth Clarke is surely only jokingly be called the "Anti-Corruption Champion", as we have not seen any action from him ever. In fact, he has been part of the problem. As you can see, police also have an agreement NOT TO INVESTIGATE lawyers. It is shocking that this Memorandum of Agreement could ever have been set up. Please keep up the good work. It looks like you are the only one in the UK with any intelligence to realise how police are supporting serious transnational organised crime by their failure to record and investigate reports. I should also point out that many victims have presented their cases in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and yet nobody has taken any action to help them. This can only be due to institutionalised corruption on a grand scale and, until some action is taken to help these people, then we will continue to believe this. Yours sincerely, ATTENTION: MS. JIL MATHESON - REGARDING INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF CRIME STATISTICS Ms. Jil Matheson UK Statistics Authority Statistics House Tredegar Park Newport South Wales NP10 8XG Dear Ms. Matheson: I was interested to read in the newspaper that you will be working with ACPO and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary on an independent review of national crime statistics. You may be interested to know that, as a result of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between ACPO and the Law Society, white collar crimes involving members of the legal profession are never logged or investigated by police. As you can see, the Memorandum of Understanding is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice. National crime statistics, therefore, can never be accurate; they never were, and never will be, unless police start recording incidents. This state of affairs is a national shame. As a result, I understand that Europe is about to step in and do Britain's policing for them. probe-UK-crime Police have openly refused, and continue to refuse, to investigage fraud, perjury or forgery, if a legal professional is involved, telling the general public that it is a civil matter. If you have a moment to watch this video, you will hear a policeman telling the gentleman that fraud is a civil matter. This is standard practice. Complaints from the public are simply ignored. No action is taken, not even a report. Of course, fraud. perjury and forgery are crimes the world over, except if they take place in the UK and involve a legal professional. One must remember that most complex white collar crime involves a legal professional......and yet it goes unreported because police will not log the crimes, much less investigate them. There are currently hundreds, if not thousands, of victims of white collar crime up and down the country, whose cases have never been logged or investigated by police. Personally, I can attest to the fact that Lancashire police have refused me, nine times to date, a log or incident number, so that I may report a crime. The refusal includes a member of the Professional Standards Branch. Not one officer has ever asked me what crime I wish to report. It could be a murder; it could be anything. However, I believe that they are afraid because I have knowledge of corruption in that constabulary, which is why they refuse to take my report. I will gladly supply the details to anyone who might feel it is their duty to act. The Home Office has already said that they don't want to involve themselves, so I can only think that, as Mr. Cameron doesn't show any interest either, nobody in the UK cares. So crimes in the UK are going unreported and uninvestigated; therefore, your statistics will always be flawed. Your review is a complete waste of government money and effort because, as long as ACPO continues to run the country with its corrupt hidden agenda, and its Memorandae of Understanding with whomever it sees fit, reports will be a complete sham. You don't have, and will never have, true statistics. Crimes committed by the police are never logged, and there are many cases of police harrassment and brutality, such as that of South Wales Police continually harrassing Mr. Maurice Kirk, and Lancashire Constabulary continually harrassing Ms. Carol Woods - no log numbers for either issues - just police harrassment in a very serious and ongoing manner, including imprisonment without due process, and attempts to section these individuals under the Mental Health Act. I would be delighted to supply information so that the government might investigate, but it appears that it does not feel it has any authority over ACPO. It seems that ACPO runs the whole country, including the Home Office, which seems to condones everything they do, and which says it has no authority to invervene in any matters whatsoever. I always thought the Prime Minister would have some power if he should choose to use it. Baroness Neville-Jones offers no apology for the attached Memorandum of Understanding, and simply stated, while addressing the House of Commons, that the Memorandum of Understanding was decommissioned in 2007. It most certainly was not, as you can see from the video. What's more, it should never have existed in the first place, as it is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice, and ACPO has been doing so for a long time, and still continue to do so. That, coupled with the outright refusal by police in every single authority to write up incident reports and issue log numbers, is a culpable offence for police officers in most other country except corrupt Britain. It is corruption not to allow people to report crimes. Perhaps this matter should be taken to higher authorities before you waste your time? It seems like someone has already told Europe about it. If I can offer any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me by email or phone. Yours sincerelyDear xxxxxx Thank you for your e-mail to Jil Matheson. I will pass to colleagues working on the review of crime statistics and we will respond properly as soon as we are able. Kind regards Alex Elton-Wall Private Secretary National Statistician's Office UK Statistics Authority Tel: 01633 455306 Mob: 07795 800089 E-mail:


FRAUDULENT USE OF EU TAXPAYERS' MONEY - AUDIT . 15 December 2013 at 13:29 Dear Sirs The British public would like you to be aware of the fraudulent manner in which the British civil servants are operating, and to take action. Civil servants are denying Freedom of Information requests to the public, but what is worse is that Ministers and/or their staff simply delete emails from members of the public without reading them. On several occasions, I have sent information to Francis Maude, Cabinet Minister, about this problem as he purports to be conducting civil service reform. I am far from being the only member of the public to experience it blocking from almost all ministries. The two examples I give today are just two of many from right across all government departments, and also from local governments. My purpose, when writing to Mr. Maude, was to advise him that this is happening in all public departments, as I innocently presumed that he did not know that parliamentary correspondence clerks often simply delete emails without reading them, and many of them contain intelligence to help them do their jobs. His own private secretary/parliamentary assistant deleted at least some of them without reading them, along with other emails, and yet the very subject of the emails was about civil servants deleting emails! She provided the proof of it below. As you will see from my email further down the page, civil servants in the UK are not providing service and are, therefore, every bit of a problem as those Palestinian civil servants who were audited by the EU. Members of the public are denied service, even by select committee members of parliament, who also either delete their emails without reading them, and ALWAYS ignore the information provided. Here are some comments from other people regarding the matter. I have removed their identifiers: From: martin brighton Date: 12 December 2013 21:30:35 GMTTo: david pidcock Subject: Re: SOMEONE IS MAKING A FOOL OF FRANCIS MAUDE Dear David, The blocking of emails to ministers by civil servants had been going on for years. The practice has several advantages: a) The civil servants are controlling the flow of information, so control the game b) The Minister is provided with the excuse of 'plausible deniability' when bad or sabotaged policies inevitably go t***-up c) The Minister is then 'owned' by the civil servant d) The civil servant can thus make or break any minister, who would be cut loose and blamed for not knowing what is going on e) When the civil servant is controlled by a third party to which there is primacy of loyalty, that third party effectively becomes the de facto government - this is the crucial point. There is such a third party that is riddled throughout the civil service, from Cabinet Office, down through every tier of governance, to local authorities and even street level. Kerslake (Sir Bob) is inextricably entangled with that organisation, and publicly supports it. Despite Eric Pickles saying 'No more spending by local authorities', they show him nothing but contempt. Because Francis Maude and the Prime Minister support this insurrectionist and corrupt organisation, both Maude and Cameron are showing sheer and Utter contempt for Pickles, whilst the organisation (COMMON PURPOSE) shows contempt for them all. In Sheffield, from 1997 to 2005, the Chief Executive Officer presided over multi-million pound fraud and corruption, whilst pandering to political whims, thus assuring promotion and teflon coating. Of course, even according to government's own records, things got worse, despite the hundreds of millions of money poured in. All the while, every project turned out to be an abysmal failure whilst the crocodile tears from the top whinged about the intransigence of public servants to culture change - exactly the same message we hear today from the Cabinet Civil Servant. And who was that CEO ? None other than Sheffield's former Chief Executive Sir Robert (Bob) Kerslake (AKA KERSNAKE) an extremely Uncivil Serpent!And what is this organisation ? Yes, you guessed it -its Common Purpose Of course, in terms that would embarrass Orwellian Newspeak, each failure is a sugar-coated triumph. Of course there will be an Inquiry, but: The Inquiry will not take place unless and until the outcome is already assured in keeping with the pre-set agenda. The civil servants will control all the input to the Inquiry. In Sheffield, the council's tactic to unwanted truths is to simply put an electronic block on the target's emails, then apply the policies of Deny and Lie, coupled with Control or Destroy. Just like the Cabinet Office today. Any continuity ? Meanwhile, via the Cabinet Office civil servants, they refuse to be open, honest and transparent about Common Purpose membership within government, which is directly contrary to Civil Service rules. Given the real agenda that is being played out by the back-door/back-room boys, Kerslake (KerSnake) is right to say that the Whitehall machine is performing remarkably well - but only if you consider that the Whitehall agenda does not reflect the manifesto of any elected government, but that of the clandestine, insurrectionist, corrupt, kerslake-supported organisation, Common Purpose. Happy times ahead, Dear Peter and friends who have suffered likewise from Secret Court abuses, Thank you for making this point about the inhumane Italian case. Everyone that I have spoken to is shocked but not surprised by the savagery demonstrated by lead Essex Social services/ health partnership professionals. We have been observing and experiencing their brutal ways for years. I'm advised by the local clergy that they have received reports of several other horror services about how badly the social services and NHS health partnerships have behaved over the years. The bad behaviour is usually driven by the individual's search for promotion or money and in the case of the COP (note: COURT OF PROTECTION) and it's associates, power and money. In our own case we had evidence of when a social services introduced/corrupt solicitor (Ms J. Pleass) instructed a psychiatrist (Dr. S Mann) to sign a COP form in order to obtain control and our family's money. It was done in a carefully timed way, so as to maximise control by social services and the solicitor who were working together with COP et al assistance. (The second corrupt solicitor working alongside the first corrupt solicitor was brother & sister owned Giles Wilson- calling themselves the Official Receiver and then Official Solicitor, in order to maximise their theft from our family under the guise of legitimate decisions carried out by a Secret Court, to whom we were disallowed an appeal) We have seen that the people who did wrong were promoted up and up the structures as a consequence of their taking risks with us and with other people's lives too. They have been upsetting whole families and the rest of the course of their lives in a routine way for decades. The model of mental terrorism that Essex employs is echoed throughout the UK in those counties that like to follow Essex's model. The Essex Deputy Social Services officer is also responsible as a leading National UK figure for the General Society for Social Workers organisation. Unusually, the Non Essex MP John Hemmings seems to have taken the case up. He is one of the few that tries to do the right thing on this issue. There has been silence from Eric Pickles who is the Essex MP who may have been responsible for looking after this particular issue involving the Italian lady and her unborn child. COP matters seem to be readily sidestepped by many MPs . These types of MP seem determined not to find answers when requests or concerns are raised about COP matters. The SoS minister Lamb was giving evidence in the House of Lords on 3rd Dec 2013 in front of a committee re. the COP, but I felt that many twists were interwoven into the evidence given. The witnesses were often not answering the question. They often seemed incapable of listening to what was being said to them. They sat side by side as they masked the seriousness of what has continued to take place under the Coalition, and Labour before that. Real evidence shows how poorly the COP has acted. But the real evidence is frequently buried. And even when it is briefly aired, it is soon forgotten by those politicians who choose to ignore it. Few in politics seem concerned about how badly the COP et al continues to perform. Even fewer have admitted that this is organised criminal activity carried out by our own UK secret courts and the personnel who attend. Lack of transparency pervades more and more of our so called public affairs. Meanwhile, the Secret courts are the root of much on going corruption. And the public are extremely worn down and upset by the lack of response shown when they raise this fact as evidence, again and again. We are tired of the fact that when evidence is called for, and we respond, having only just head about the call, we are suddenly stopped short. The receiving of evidence is suddenly curtailed. And the politicians are protected once more by the civil servants, from feeling the full scale wrath of the public. The public who object to secret courts need to have their complaints fully heard. Various groups have experienced such poor management and performance by the COP and it's associates who work together most effectively to destroy so many lives. The Secret court corruption is on such a widescale that we feel that the evidence committee should sit again and receive a further 2 reports from the ministers following the many questions that they failed to answer. And there should be at least two more sessions of evidence taking to hear from the focus group leaders who have experienced the non performance of the COP et al, often at first hand. There should be no attempt to put only the polished representatives before the House. The House of Lords Committee deserves to hear direct from the man & woman on the street who has suffered as a consequence of the COP et al's masked inhumanity and poor performance. Regards, ************************* NOTE: The House of Lords Parliamentary Committee on the Mental Capacity Act refused to hear evidence of crime and corruption involving mentally incapacitated or vulnerable persons on the bais that people were named. So they evidence has simply been thrown into the garbage by the very committee that should be protecting these people. Mike Clark and several others received a letter from the Chairman of the Committee, Lord Hardie, after submitting evidence that should be investigated, and having been advised that MPs, police, and ministers have refused to either investigate and/or respond to allegations of very serious fraud taking place within the courts and/or facilitated by the Official Solicitor’s office. This denial of service is mass fraud – they are being paid public monies to do a job that they are simply not doing. Furthermore, these Lords are concealing allegations of criminality instead of investigating them, and they will receive an EU PENSION at the end of their working life. ********************** True to form, they all turn a blind eye when confronted with allegations of official corruption. There is not one person in the UK, including the Prime Minister, willing to address these allegations. Some of the victims of serious white collar crimes have presented their cases, on several occasions, to Members of the House of Commons, and Members of the House of Lords. Some are recorded on video. There has been no offer of help for them, and the crimes are uninvestigated because British police refuse to record or investigate the allegations, and nobody in government cares. Will you please be kind enough to read on. At the end of this page, you will see the evidence of Libby Dewdney-Herbert, Mr. Maude’s personal assistant, deleting emails without reading them. It shows a total disdain for the public. As a result, I wrote the email highlighted in green, using information in the public domain, which highlights the fraudulent use of EU monies by British public servants, ministers and MPs. They are not doing the job that the taxpayers expect them to do, especially when they don’t even read correspondence from concerned citizens about the corruption of both parliament and police. The items highlighted in yellow show how public servants are deleting emails addressed to ministers without reading them. As you will see, the new National Crime Agency is also deleting emails containing criminal intelligence. It is no wonder that the UK is unable to prosecute criminals operating at a high level of serious organised crime. Evidence may be lost, due to lazy civil servants who simply don’t want to have to deal with correspondence. You will see from some of the newspaper reports that they now do not deal with emails on Thursdays, and many take Fridays off. Many work from home, where there is no supervision. These are ONLY TWO examples. Britain is a threat to world security, and something needs to be done about both its abysmally corrupt policing, and its abysmal public servants and parliamentarians who allow them to block information, and who do nothing at all to investigate allegations of serious corruption and cover ups involving criminals with law degrees, judges, lawyers and police. This may also be of interest to you: . Like CommentShare 2 Shares . You and 2 others like this. . Yvonne Stewart-Taylor RESPONSE TO SOMEONE IS MAKING A FOOL OF FRANCIS MAUDE “Decision FS50435121 The Cabinet Office carefully interpret a request about cont...See more by: Yvonne Stewart-Taylor about an hour ago · Like .. Mike Clarke IT IS TIME to start to name them with dates of birth and photos of their properties with addresses as we are doing and to shame them publicly to publish it all..

Back to top

Working by ARCHAngel Michael
In this section you will find some information about Archangel Michael. Archangel Michael is a prince of the Angels, prince of light, regent prince of the seraphim, regent prince of the virtues, an angel of deliverance and a prince of the divine presence. His name is in a form of a rhetorical question, meaning “ who is like God?”. Archangel Michael is the angel of protection,strength and truth. He gives you courage to face the truth and overcome any obstacles and fears that you have about your future. He helps us to find increased clarity in what we think,do and say, and helps us to be more assertive and have more self - belief and self - assurance. He helps us to work with the theme of personal will, showing and encouraging us to bring our own will into harmony with Divine will (“Thy will, not mine”). As we become more aware of our personal power and will, our capacity to be gentle and loving members of humanity increases. When we are fearful, Archangel Michael comes to dissolve doubt and fear, and gently teaches us how to understand and work with the basic theme of this world - that of duality and the battle between darkness and light. Archangel Michael is one of the Guardians of karma, and can help us to work with and clear any karma or karmic entanglements we have with each other. In his work with us on the First Ray he wants us to develop our own strength and willpower and to both recognise, accept and integrate our shadow aspects. In our daily and spiritual lives he gives us the strength to stand up and fight for what is right and light, and to recognise our own truths and stand up for them.

Michael is the Archangel of power, desire and action. He is often pictured carrying a sword which symbolises the power of love and which may cut us free of all that binds us or holds us prisoner. His sword is surrounded by a silvery - blue flame, which we interpret as the Magdalenen flame containing the innocent and pure energy of the love of Divine Source - the flame from the great central sun at the heart of our universe. Blue is also the colour of his protective cloaking energy, which we may invoke at any time we need protection. Michael’s primary task is to cleanse Earth’s atmosphere and the auras of all humankind of all lower thought - forms, dissolving all that is not perfect or of the highest vibrations. He wants to show all sentient beings the path back To God when they have strayed. Archangel Michael has also taken on the role of Protector and Guardian of mankind, and he is relentless in his protection and defence of those who wish to live in the light. He is committed to help all souls who call on him and will always assist in whatever action is necessary to bring about justice and resolution. Another symbol representative of his energies is a scale of balance, representing Justice. He also carries the gold Ray of Source, which may sometimes be seen blazing from his solar plexus, or surrounding him.

Name meaning “He who is as God”
Virtues Health, Organization, Power
Colour of Aura Blue, Gold
Guards this day Wednesday, Sunday
Ray Works with the First Ray of Divine will, Power and Protection
Element Fire
Relevant Chakra 5th ( Throat) and 3rd ( Solar Plexus)
Related to number 6
Related to Crystals blue crystals: sapphire, blue topaz: for peacefulness, and healing
Yellow / gold crystals: yellow topaz, citrine: to initiate positive action,
Improve communications. Other crystals are Ruby, Tigers Eye, Amber, Turquoise and Lapis, Chrysolite
Aromatherapy oils Myrrh, Eucalyptus and Lemon
Herbs Chamomile, Rosemary, St John’s Wort, Mistletoe, Melissa, Eyebright
Incense Frankinscense, myrrh, Copal, Cinnamon, Bergamot
Colour Gold, Yellow
Symbols Sword, Blue Cloak, Sun, Gold, Metal Colour, Scale of balance
The Function of Archangel Michael
Archangel Michael is the guardian of the house of spirit and dreams, and is the archangel working for cooperation and reconciliation. Now is the time for us to learn to live in peace and harmony with others, to break down the barriers that have separated nations, political parties, religious sects, families, and individuals due to differences of opinion, fear. All of us are citizens of Earth, regardless of our diversity. In the movement toward this level of cooperation, Michael is the being to invoke.
When to ask Archangel Michael for help
You may want to invoke Archangel Michael when
• you are faced with changes that you are uncertain about
• have a person or situation you are having difficulty confronting
• need help with clarity of communication
• when you need physical strength
• when you wish to cut ties that bind you to a thing, person or situation
• when you need spiritual protection
How to Invoke Archangel Michael
Michael protect me
The sword of Michael and his truth protects me
His cloak of blue covers me
Michael give me the strength as I courageously face this situation
Michael cut away all falseness with your sword so that I may be myself
I courageously claim my power
The energies of the Angels and the Stars strengthen me
Righteousness, truth and love is my path
Visualize the sword as metal or a living flame helping you to cut away fear

Archangel Michael is the warrior Archangel associated with Life Mission and Divine Purpose.
We are currently in a time known as 'The Age Of Michael', so-called because Michael is working with SO many people right now.
This powerful and mighty Angel comes through frequently in my Consultations because it is vital that we all stand up and claim our Divine Right Purpose; the work we came here to do.
It is also imperative that we have the courage to let go of situations and patterns that are blocking this. Michael lends his Sword Of Truth and Light to cut away all that does not serve us.
Archangel Michael is working consistently from the Upper Realms this year to guide you onto your Highest Path; that which will most highly serve yourself and the entire planet, and will bring you the deepest fulfillment, joy and love.
If you have not yet consciously connected with this magnificent warrior-like Archangel, perhaps this message is a clear sign from him that you take steps to do so!
Even if you regularly make contact with him in your own way, today Michael has a specific message, which I have channeled for you. Just reading the words given from High Beings such as Michael creates changes in your personal vibration, and will open your Heart to accept more Love into your life.
"Dear All Bringers Of the Light upon the Earth,
I am deeply honoured to make my connections with you at this critical time in your beloved planet's evolution.
Many of you are familiar with my vibration and words - having sought me out in times of intense change and doubt, many fears for your future purpose being the first thing on your mind when you call upon me.
What is important to know is that any time you activate my Light within your Soul, simply by calling me in, the profound vibrational shifts and micro-cellular activity within your energy field is begun. This spiritual medicine works upon your whole being; physical, mental, emotional and within the Chakra energy system.
Without conscious awareness, you are then strongly guided to make life choices and changes that you may have been avoiding through misguided fear. Everything I guide and direct you to do is through my all-encompassing Love for you and your contribution to peace in the Universe.
Now is the time when I make myself known to you with a renewed vigour!
For a new time has commenced - this I must impress upon you now. A new time wherein all Souls who have elected to be the harbingers of real, positive and electrifying change are called up for active service to the Divine.
This means YOU, Dear Child of Holiness.
Believe my words as I speak, that I am directing you with haste and speed towards a life that is your truest and most Heavenly function. If life seems to speed up a little forthwith, make no mistakes in your thinking - it is MY work!
I am swelled with Love and pride for you, my Blessed children of Light,
Lord and Messenger of Truth, Honour and Holy Purpose."

Back to top

Make a LIVING WILL now!! SEE mum's HERE
to protect you.

"Predatory Guardian" The PREDATORY GUARDIAN

In the FRAME is
Hugh Adrian Scott Jones DO YOU

He has took control of 300 clients money and spends it, mainly upon himself.

Pannone LLP & NOW £20 million

Commercial Lien/Claim to Read

A claim made under common law, a claim made under GOD, a claim that GOD is my witness to the truth!! A claim made without any rebuttal! Read the debt & read LIENS RECOGNISED BY PANNONES & where it is clear that PANNONE s partner Richard Drinkwater, whom is one of our endebted partners within our own Commercial Lien above, against themselves at PANNONE s and his recognition of holders of liens where creditors such as us, "are authentic", where PANNONE s have openly claimed no recognition of "our commercial lien" against them or the Commercial Affidavit Process claiming its of no value. Can one clearly see the contradictions that are riddled in the company Pannone s, that is so called award winning, are the awards for contradiction. see the picture! Isn't it funny the minute a commercial lien is served upon them that they do not recognise it, so why did they fraudulently use harassement laws to try to curtail it! Probably spending, according to them in excess of £50,000. Was this action in effect recognition, of a perfected commercial lien? Seeing as this is turning out to be a trial by internet we will let you the public be the judge of this!

Appointed by judge DENZIL LUSH, against the direct wishes of the patient, Hugh Jones of PANNONE & Co solicitors Manchester took his position in charge of mums damages awarded to pay for care in 2001 the sum of £775,000, as her deputy/receiver. It has to be said and noted that his first years charges, expected to be £2500 as laid down by judge Denzil LUSH, actually came out at £26,371.77p! Take note that in his first year of office whilst he gave me and my mother £200 per week to live off he deducted from the damages £507 per week charges just to say NO! every time his phone rang. The problems, having been astronomic to the point of writing a book, started from day 1 with the words from Mr Hugh Jones's "broad brush approach" that suddenly turned very narrow! Since that first year of 2001 he has refused to supply any details of the subsequent 9 years of charges that remain a secret to this day ON 311011. If it was your relative would you consider this theft!

Judge Denzil Lush
The Judge

Whom in our opinion, has no idea of the family decimation that he is causing or if he does he is certainly turning a blind eye to the reality of the lies, ignorance, discrimination, corruption, theft, absolute breaches in human rights and the complete lack of equality that is the cornerstone of THE COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!

We are members of the
British Constitution Group of
Lawfull Rebellion

Back to top

Blackpool MP - Gordon Marsden
MP Gordon Marsden

Our Labour MP representative for Blackpool South area, Mr Gordon Marsden. upon writing my concerns to him in November 09 it took him 3 months to send an unsatisfactory reply. I then wrote to the party office. On the 29th November 2010 I wrote to Gordon Marsden but to date no reply! Today 14.01.2011 I wrote to his party office complaining and sent a copy of the email back to Gordon of the 29th Nov 2010.

OPG- Chief - Alan Eccles

link1 & link2 To Martin John Ex: Chief Executive of the OPG. Five statutory principles that underpin the MCA 2005: • it should be assumed that everyone over 16 has the capacity to make their own decision, unless it can be shown they lack capacity • a patient should not be regarded as unable to make a decision until all practicable steps to help them make it have been taken, without success • a person should not viewed as someone lacking the capacity to make a decision, simply because the decision is unwise • practitioners must ensure that any act done or decision made on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be in their best interests • any decision made must also be the least restrictive of their basic rights and freedoms.

So, what is lawful rebellion? (or being a freemen on the land)
I’ll try to give a little basic background to it.
(Please note it’s not comprehensive it’s just a rough guide)
In the year 1215 the first of our constitutional rights were set down on paper, it was called the Magna Carta, this was basically an oath from the crown (King or Queen) to uphold the rights of the people set down in it and to look after the peoples best interests, in return for the crowns promise to the people they agreed to be ruled by the crown, so it was a contract between crown and people basically, and it became the law.
The crown had to uphold the rights and common law as did the people, not to cause death, harm, or loss to another, or be fraudulent in your contracts (in other words be honest and true).
In 1689 the bill of rights was set down on paper, this basically sealed all the rights given in the Magna Carta plus a few more, both documents contain our UK common law written down and formed our law.
These two documents are the main fundamental parts of our UK constitution, yes we do actually have one, many claim that the UK has no written constitution, this is not true. We have the most respected constitution in the world, it is the basis of the constitutions of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India.
Rather than being one written document we have several that make up the UK constitution, the primary of which is the Magna Carta and the 1689 bill of rights. (the freeman movement in Canada seems to be gaining respect from some Canadian policemen) Part of both the Magna Carta and the 1689 bill of rights states that they cannot be repealed because they are such well-made laws and rights!
“”Lord Justice Laws on 18th February 2002: "The special status of constitutional statutes follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689…Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not…." “
Now our ancestors were not daft, they knew there could be a problem one day if the crown became unjust, or turned into some sort of dictatorship, or parliament was acting against the people, or was full of corruption, or was not allowing the crown to keep its oath.
So in article 61 of the Magna Carta it was written that if this ever happened you could petition the crown to sort out the crowns problem (or parliaments if it was them), the crown had 40 days to fix it or dissolve parliament. If in the 40 days nothing was fixed the petitioner could go into rebellion against the crown and parliament lawfully until the problem was resolved.
Because this was lawful and the petitioner had a right to do it he would go into “lawful rebellion”, he would no longer have allegiance to the crown or parliament because they had become corrupt etc, he would be a hindrance and a rebel, and fight to end the corruption or injustice within the system, it was law that he could do this, and he was actually obeying the law by doing it, because it is the peoples duty to fight corruption and uphold the law.
So that’s the basics of it.

Because our constitution cannot be repealed it is still valid law.
Now, to do this today you first send an affidavit (a sworn oath of truth, the most powerful lawful and legal document you can get) to our Queen, stating that the crown or in this case our government acting for the crown and its MPs are breaking the constitutional contract (and they really are breaking it), and ask for it to be fixed within 40 days, this is witnessed and counter signed and sealed by a credible witness (I used a solicitor).
I did not make my oath lightly, I took an oath to defend the crown when I joined the army, I was now withdrawing my oath of allegiance, it may sound strange to some but I had a lump in my throat doing it, it was made in good faith.
It is then sent to the queen, then if in 40 days the problem is not fixed a second affidavit is then sent to the Queen, this time saying that the problem is not fixed and therefore the crown or government acting for the crown has broken the contract with the people, and you are therefore no longer going to obey or be ruled by a corrupt crown or government, you are now in lawful rebellion.
Now contrary to what any government officials may tell you this is lawful, and it is a binding oath sworn before God (and the witness), it is my right, your right, everyone’s right to do this, but only if there is a genuine breach of the contract.
The powers that be want you to believe that we have no constitution and anything we do have has been repealed, or 90% of it anyway, it’s in their interests to have you believe this so they can get away with anything they want without the people stopping them.
As you can see from the statement by Lord Justice Laws it is our constitution and cannot just be scrapped by parliament or our self-serving MPs and politicians, it is still valid law no matter what our politicians say, they have never ever had the right to repeal any of it.
Some of the breaches we are using for entering lawful rebellion are, corruption in parliament and our government, we all know this is happening, It’s not just one party its them all.
Our past and present government has allowed and is allowing foreign powers (the EU) to rule over us. The European Union, this is a hugely corrupt system and its not working in anyone’s best interests except the EU politicians and their powerful business associates, the EU is a dictatorship, run by un elected leaders, look into it and you will see this is true.
When our government handed over our sovereignty to the EU they committed treason!
This is 100% true, they really have committed treason, take a look at the Ukip website for some very interesting facts and figures etc., it is beyond belief what the EU gets up to (I’m just using Ukip as they have collected a lot of info, not because they are the exception to any other party).
The EU is our peoples greatest enemy, second to that is our own government and most of the mainstream parties, I know that the police are supposed to be non-political but you all have freedom of thought and I am sure you must realise what a corrupt bunch of leaders we have (done worry I’m not looking for comments on this! lol)
When our government does something wrong they just pretend they haven’t done it, if it gets to hot a subject they stick a gagging order on it (D notice I think is the correct term?).
Lawful and Legal? What's the difference?
There’s lots of talk on the freeman sites (and other sites) about being Lawful and legal and the difference between the two, but there’s not much in the way of a basic guide so it ends up confusing, some will know the difference but for those who don’t here we go. Basically anything in our constitution including common law is lawful (true law).
Any acts that parliament have passed are legal, these will be in the form of acts or statute laws, these “legal” acts should not contradict common law or what’s in our constitution, some of them do but we won’t go into that.
We had a system in place that could not be changed (common law and our constitution), so if parliament wanted to pass new legal acts etc. it had to find a way of doing it and making it enforceable. The Royal navy already used a legal system called Admiral law to keep its sailors in check and make sure its members obeyed officers and the navy rules, all navy members had to swear an oath to obey it etc. it became a legal contract and so it was enforceable. It was only used on ships and within the navy but it worked and was ready made so parliament adopted it (or a version of it), now parliament had a system to use to make new “legal” laws.
For it to work people had to think it was lawful, we did not know any different so we just took it as being right and obeyed, but none of us have ever sworn an oath to parliament or the crown to be in the navy and obey admiralty law (unless you have been in the navy I guess), so there is no binding contract between legal acts or statutes and the people, we have been getting duped into obeying them.
A statute law or act is in legal terms is defined as “ an act given the force of law by the consent of the governed”, note it says consent, so if you don’t consent to it and there is no contract between yourself and the other party it is not law. So now you see why freemen (and those claiming to be freemen) will say I do not consent, and there is no contract between us, I have broken no law when you are going to arrest them or make them obey an act or statute legislation.
I have served my lawful affidavits to the crown and I am not in the Navy or under admiralty law, so I am a freeman on the land.
When the queen made her coronation oath it was to uphold the people’s rights and common law and do her duty for our country and its people.
When you made your oaths to the queen it was to her so she could uphold her oaths and the law.
When I swore my oath I did it lawfully and honourably in good faith, and for the right reasons, so please don’t write us all off as nutters, I urge you all to please give us the benefit of the doubt when dealing with freemen.
If the person you are dealing with has filed their affidavits and is genuinely in lawful rebellion under article 61 of the Magna Carta (they should be able to show you proof), I urge you to please follow common law when dealing with them, they are truly under the jurisdiction of common law only, not acts of parliament or statue law.
By trying to hold a genuine freeman on anything other than a breach of common law you would truly be breaking common law yourself, and your oaths were to uphold our queen and common law.
I genuinely hope this has given you a little better understanding of what we are doing and why.
Thanks go to Rebel Leader for allowing me to use this article to explain what a freeman/woman on the land is.





DECEMBER 5 2012 594808

DECEMBER 6 2012 594888 80

DECEMBER 7 2012 595001 113

DECEMBER 14 2012 595361 113

DECEMBER 10 2012
Read my affidavit to the Queen


A court of equity is a court which can apply equitable remedies to disputes. Courts of equity operate within the legal system, but rather than focusing on the application of law, they look at cases and determine outcomes based on fairness. Also known as chancery courts, courts of equity can be found in many regions of the world. In some areas, they operate entirely separately from courts of law, and in others, a court of law is empowered to handle both legal and equitable remedies.
The concept of a chancery court arose in England when citizens began to express dissatisfaction with legal judgments handed down by the courts. They argued that the law was sometimes unfair, and that some situations were not covered by the law, making it impossible for the courts to respond. Courts of equity arose to handle legal situations in which people might want damages beyond monetary damages, with the judge empowered to act on discretion, rather than following the rule of the law.
A court of equity still has some legal responsibilities, but it has more leeway when it comes to judging cases. It can hand down a judgment which includes an equitable remedy such as an injunction, as opposed to simple monetary damages. Courts of equity can be used for things like specific performance, for example, in which someone is asked to make good on a breach of contract.
Notice to the High Court: Delivered by hand – at the Manchester Justice Centre: 14th January 2013. CASE 2MA90015 Notice is given to ‘the court’ of the following: - In the matter of MICHAEL CLARKE (legal fiction). · Challenge of jurisdiction: · Challenge of the legitimacy of the judge: · The Queen is no longer sovereign: · All prior orders are void: · There is no case to answer: This notice is delivered in writing prior to the commencement of any hearing in recognition of the fact that in the past when reasonable approach has been made to ‘the court’ to deal with the issues presented below… the court has adopted a position of abandonment – and has resorted to secret hearings to declare judgment in an effort to retain its authority… we can no longer tolerate avoidance of the facts and we thus challenge the court to address these issue or be condemned by its own acquiescence through silence. No court can make judgment in its own cause… it is anathema to justice. We claim that the High Court has no legitimacy… because it fails to uphold the rule-of-law and has resorted instead to the rule-of-force (coercion) to impose its claimed authority. Legitimate authority derives from consent not coercion. The court must address the issues raised or the authority of the court evaporates. The issues are not going to go away and more and more people will challenge the court until addressed. Challenging the authority of government and the legitimacy of the judiciary is a democratic right where questions of propriety arise Challenge to Jurisdiction: In the matter of MICHAEL CLARKE (legal fiction): MICHAEL CLARKE is a legal fiction - summonsed by High Court order to ‘appear’ today and is presented to the court as ordered – in recognition of the authority of the court and its jurisdiction over the legal fiction The legal fiction appears by way of a copy of the birth certificate… as the ‘original’ certificate is not available. MICHALE CLARKE as referred to in the High court document is not a living sentient being… i.e. a man – this is self-evident - as no man is subject to the authority of any other without his consent - we are all born equal. This is not a romantic notion it is a statement of cold hard fact. Neither the denial or bluster of the legal profession in any capacity will suppress the authority of logic – and we present to the court the logic that ‘no man has authority over any other without their consent’ – if the court claims so to have… show the law. The authority of statutes are imposed legally upon ‘persons’ which are corporations. The legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE is a corporate entity. ‘Person’ is not defined in statute law as ‘a man’ and therefore it isn’t ‘a man.’ The authority imposed upon the legal fiction the ‘person’ transfers to the man upon consent – upon using ‘the name’ of ‘the person.’ No consent = no authority. Imposed authority is coercion. Coercion is unlawful. The name MICHEAL CLARKE does not attach itself to a man as a compulsion… is happens only by consent. No authority exist that permits one man to impose his will on another man without his consent… this is unlawful. The government can however claim authority over the legal fiction, created by government. The court repeatedly avoids this issue… because the legal fiction is the foundation of its authority and with this revealed… the true authority of the court i.e. ‘the consent of the people’ is exposed. The courts paranoia – that it will lose its authority if the legal fiction is exposed is unfounded… the reverse is now the case… the legal fiction (115 million pages on Google) is well and truly established as a fact and the continued denial by the High Court only serves to diminish its authority… by diminishing trust in it. It must surely be the case that Judges who continue to deny the legal fiction will attract cynicism and distrust to all judgments of the court, thus bringing it into disrepute. No group of men can write regulations (Acts of parliament) to subject other men to their arbitrary authority – we are governed by consent – this is not a hollow claim – it is a maxim and is the very foundation of our governance. Statutes have only equal authority of government, they do not exceed that authority – thus statutes must also be subject to our consent and the withdrawal of same. We know fully how that consent has been secured through the legal fiction… High Court judges know how consent is secured through the legal fiction and through presumptions, in the absence of the denial of consent. Let it be made clear… consent is and has been denied consistently – all presumptions and assumptions are denied. The jurisdiction of the court is subject to the consent of all parties to a dispute. If the ‘High Court’ insists on asserting that it has authority beyond consent over the man (not the legal fiction) then show the law that authorises it. If the court insists on imposing its claimed authority - in the face of the denial of consent then a claim is raised that a tort has been committed against the man and the liability falls to the administrator of the court. If the High Court will not give way to the demands of the people that it respect and uphold our laws - then its authority evaporates… and its relevance diminished to nought. All that remains is tyranny. The jurisdiction of the court is challenged on several levels… even under its own rules. No case to answer: There is no subject matter. Late delivery by the Pannone. Hearsay (written affidavits) inadmissible – due to ‘Notice of intention to rely on such evidence’ not given. The court claims to control who can and cannot address the court. ‘No right of audience’ this is a patently bias in favour of the legal profession – bias is unlawful. A judge who imposes the restriction of ‘No right of audience’ must recuse themselves for bias. [Barristers are servants of the court – this is a conflict of interest where the ‘defendant’ is challenging the authority of the court.] Representation in court by individuals who are not servants of the court will be more robust in their challenges of the court. The exposure of the legal fiction is testament to this. Challenge to the legitimacy of the judge: · The authority of the High Court judge is challenged - where there is no evidence of the authority so claimed then none exists. We have moved beyond ‘authority by assumption.’ Authority by one can only be imposed on another with their consent… if no consent is given then the imposition of authority implies a master slave relationship… slavery is repugnant and goes against the basic principles of a civil society – those who insist on the imposition of their authority without consent are tyrants – and tyrants are a threat to the peaceful coexistence of all free people – they must be vanquished. · Tyrants have been dealt with before – Magna Carta and the Declaration of Rights is the legacy of that struggle and these laws are at our disposal today to strike down any new attempts at tyranny – even when it comes dressed up as law. · Acts of Parliament are not laws… if they were, they would be called Laws of Parliament. Acts of Parliament are merely statutes, they are referred to as statutes … and statutes gain the authority of law when they are consented to. We are not adverse to consenting to statutes – but those designed to impose overbearing control will be opposed – and rightly so. · The constant imposition of unreasonable statutes is the flint to the dry grass… and the judiciary may be the first bale to burn. · The authority of the judge derives from the sovereignty of the people on whose behalf they administer justice… they do not impose their decisions on their own created authority. The people’s authority is represented by our Sovereign Monarch… to whom the judiciary give sworn allegiance that they will uphold our laws. · If there is any diminishment of the standing of the Monarch then the authority of the judge fails because he/she too would lose standing. · Where the Monarch’s authority fails… the people’s authority remains intact… because the people’s sovereignty is supreme. · Where the Monarch’s authority fails – so does the judges – who must then seek a new authority from the people… not from politician’s as this would destroy the fundamental principle of the separation of powers – and judges cannot create their own arbitrary authority. · The Monarch’s authority has failed… brought about by the duplicity of parliament which has surrendered its own authority contrary to our constitution. Her majesty did not prevent the surrender of parliament to a foreign power by refusing the Royal Assent – despite over a million signatories in petition. Parliament may well have surrendered its sovereignty to a foreign power… but the people’s sovereignty remains intact. · The people’s sovereignty is secure and our constitution defends it through its various elements such as Magna Carta. · Magna Carta is the law and judges of the High Court must submit to it – or suffer the consequences of the law. · Nobody is above the law – and that includes High Court judges. · Lord Scarman said… “A government above the law is a menace to be defeated” · It is undeniably the case that a judiciary above the law is a tyranny to be defeated………. our law is unequivocal and it is this: - “No man shall be imprisoned without a jury of his peers” · It seems that today’s judges have been ‘trained’ beyond the capacity to understand this basic and simple logic. · Those judges who step over that mark and act in defiance of our law must be held to account and striped of their duties – and their pensions. · If this court does not concede to the demand of a trial by jury then that demand will go to the highest court in the land… the people’s grand jury – to settle this matter once and for all. · If it is necessary for the people’s grand jury to be called upon… and it finds in favour of trial by jury as it surely will because it is the unquestionable right of the people, then the full body of High Court judges will have to be dismissed and replaced. It is not beyond the powers of the people to do this. NO SOVEREIGNTY: · The sovereignty of the people is not in question – but the sovereignty of Her Majesty must be seen to be in doubt – if the claim made by John Major (Ex Premier) has any validity. Major said of the Queen “ The Queen is a citizen of the European Union” – this claim is to imagine the death of the Queen. The Prime Minister would not make that statement without legal advice because of the constitutional significance. · The implications are that the Queen has accepted mediatisation. i.e. she is no longer sovereign. · If the Queen is no longer sovereign – where do the courts and judges claim to have secured their authority? · The political establishment have devised a wheeze to avoid this vital question… they obfuscate with the phrase ‘shared sovereignty’ which is an oxymoron and can be discounted as nonsense. · We either have sovereignty or we do not. If we have sovereignty then the authority of the court is not in question… only its actions. Its actions to deny trial by jury are unlawful. There may be some ‘legal’ provision to deny a trial by jury (it is doubtful) but even if there were -‘legal’ is not ‘lawful’ and where they are in conflict then ‘the legal’ provision would not stand because it would be defeated by our common law (supreme law). · If the Queen is no longer sovereign, then the authority of the High Court falls on this reality. If the Queen is still Sovereign then there should be no problem getting confirmation of this fact from Her Majesty… there are channels to secure this written confirmation by Her Majesty’s Private Secretary. This is not beyond the capability of the High Court for Her Majesty’s Sovereignty to be confirmed in writing. Silence will tell all. Re: Constitutional Monarchy · The United Kingdom is defined as a constitutional monarchy because we have both a constitution and our Head of State is a Monarch. Our constitution defines our form of government – the government does not define our form of constitution – in recent times this principle has been unlawfully reversed without the consent of the people and has been carried out by unscrupulous politicians, aided and abetted by members of the legal profession. The courts to date have made no contribution to stopping this process of change that has diminished the people’s sovereignty whilst enhancing authority elsewhere including with foreign institutions. · If the sovereignty of the people has been compromised and the reversal is not challenged, then we are clearly culpable through our own apathy. · The constitution is the foundation of our freedoms and our liberties and MUST be upheld by the courts… or the courts must be abandoned. · We now have a government that seeks to rewrite our constitution and by so doing empower itself – at our expense. · A demand for jury trial is exercising our constitutional rights, which if denied gives evidence of collusion by the courts with unlawful governance – we cannot be allowed to stand. This is treason. Void Orders. · No order made by a court that lacks jurisdiction has any authority – it is void. · A void order cannot be breached – the order does not exist. Does the court claim that MICHAEL CLARKE is a man? – then let the court provide the proof. The evidence of logic to the contrary overrides any such claim. Does the court claim authority over the man? – Then Let the court provide the proof. Can ‘the judge’ give evidence of his authority… his oath of office? His Warrant from the Queen? Is the Queen still Sovereign? The evidence suggest not. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. We understand that the judiciary take oath amongst themselves not to engage in any discussion in court re the legal fiction entity and under pressure to do so they are instructed to abandon the court… suppression of the fact re the legal fiction being paramount. There is recurring evidence to support this claim… the judiciary will not discuss this matter – which gives rise to the certainly of the legal fiction. There are in excess of 115 million web sites on Google which overwhelming support the concept of the legal fiction… this is quite staggering - there is random but sparse opposition to the idea… logic dominates. To reinforce the position… the judiciary will not engage. If the judiciary serve another master… then they must recuse themselves. We understand that the court order stipulated that MICHEAL CLARKE should appear before the court – and this order has been complied with. If the court dissents – then the court should give evidence as to who the name is. A judicial determination. The man is prepared to present himself to a court of law… he is not adverse to justifying his actions… but he will not respond to coercion and the threat of violence against him made BY THE COURT – coercion is unlawful – the courts themselves are not above the law. The man will make himself available to a common law court. Show the law where the court claims the authority to imprison a man without a jury of his peers. We present Magna Carta as the law – well established… that says he must have a jury trial. The CPR may not provide for a jury trial – but nor does it provide for its exclusion. Nor does it claim the right to suppress our constitution… it seems to leave this to individual judges… if they are bold enough to do so. Surely the CPR rules are a trap for unwitting judges. The matter to hand: Contempt of Court. · Honestly held belief: Freemen have an honestly held belief that they have a right to a fair trial… which means a jury trial – and that statute courts are subject to consent. Where there is no jury trial facilitated by the court and no consent given by the man then there is a legitimate challenge that orders of the court are void. · The denial of a jury trial is bias. · No contempt of court can be claimed to exist where no jurisdiction exists… and where no order has been breached because the order is void. · If the court does not have jurisdiction… on subject matter… then its order is void… and ignoring those orders is therefore not a contempt of the court. · Any denial of due process would warrant a claim of a void order. The rule-of-force. · The threat of force is coercion: · THE JUDGE may take it upon himself to engage force to demonstrate his unproven authority… this would be deemed a criminal act in the eyes of the man - the man reserves the right to use all lawful means to defend his rights, freedoms and liberties… and he reserves the right to pursue justice beyond the court system if this fails in its duty to preserve impartiality. · The people’s authority must prevail – through the rule of law – not the rule-of-force. · If the ‘High Court’ threatens us with violence to secure its claimed authority – we have no option but to concede under duress. But there should be no doubt about the dynamics of the situation thus created. Our concession should not be construed as an act of weakness – we will be pragmatic in the face of adversity – and bide our time. Lawful Rebellion: The people of Britain have a right to rebel against arbitrary and unjust governance… that this exists is demonstrable. The Lawful Rebellion movement gathers momentum and the underlying demand is that the government and the judiciary respect our common law right of which Magna Carta is a foundation. Where the judiciary will not recognise Magna Carta… we will not recognise them. The ball is in the court. What game shall we play? The Real issue- The real purpose of the harassment claim – it is an attempt to gag. The man has claimed that ‘in his view’ one of the partners, also a plaintiff - Hugh Jones - is a crook who has stolen his mother’s money. He has called on the partners in Pannones to investigate and provide a thorough and transparent investigation… which they have refused to do. Pannones defer their responsibility to an external body… the secretive ‘Court of Protection’ which according to the accounts of many… is protecting criminality, not vulnerable people. The man has good cause to claim that there is collusion between Hugh Jones, the Court of Protection and their ombudsman… again these impressive sounding ‘bodies’ of so called authority are always represented by a single individual, all of whom hail from the same profession… the opportunity for collusion and corruption is not unimaginable… and hence why the man has pursued the common law process of a commercial lien. The man has a lawfully obtained and fully perfected commercial lien against the Pannone Partners to the value of Nine Million pounds. The man has every right to pursue payment of this debt and no court has the right to deny this. Another single member of the legal profession (a judge) tried to declare this illegal… which is fine because the commercial lien process claims no ‘legal’ status… it is entirely an animal of the common law process and is thus ‘lawful’ and derives it legitimacy through common law and irrefutable logic. It is telling that Pannones have done everything in their power to avoid the simple process of an internal inquiry into the allegations of corruption of one of their partners… it raises serious questions as to WHY? What have they got to hide. Pannones get their business from the Court of Protection… the Court of Protection have appointed Hugh Jones… and the Court of Protection cannot be investigated. Hugh Jones and Pannones could ‘thank’ the Court of Protection and nobody would know…. The ‘set-up’ is protected… this is probably why it is called the Court of Protection Pannones are desperate to gag the man… using the harassment Act and the man is determined to expose the alleged corruption, using the pressure of persistence – because there is no remedy in the legal system. The man has a duty to prevent crime when he sees it happening… and this is precisely what he is doing. The man has declared war on Pannones… despite all the pressure he has brought to bear, they have still not investigated Hugh Jones – ONE HAS TO ASK – WHY? On the balance of probability… it seems that there is more to Pannone’s refusal to provide a proper and meaningful explanation of where the man’s mother’s money has gone… in their robustness to avoid answering some simple questions Pannones have preferred to subjected themselves to a ‘sustained pressure’ to expose the truth. Pannones would obviously like the pressure to stop… and it is so easily achieved. Provide the answers re the alleged corruption by Hugh Jones and the problem will disappear. Sustained pressure… is not harassment. It is a legitimate method to prevent crime when the ‘appropriate bodies’ refuse to do so. The Great Irony. One of the plaintiffs in this matter a Mr Paul Jonson –titles himself as HEAD OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONS - an offer was made to Paul Jonson for mediation in an attempt to ‘resolve’ the matter – which was declined by him. It seems that the Pannones crew are a strange bunch - simple not what they claim to be… with a resolutions department that avoids resolution and a protection department allegedly not protecting - and with some very important issues about alleged corruption in their ranks to still to address. The claim of harassment is a gagging ploy. The exposure of Pannones as a direct consequence of the man’s probing may reveal that there is more to this than meets the eye. We should applaud the man for his persistence – and condemn Pannones for their evasion of the truth.T Pannones had the choice of going the very easy route - by providing transparency and answers to easy questions… or the enormously hard route of prevarication and dodging the issue - subjecting themselves to a barrage of pressure (all is fair in love and war… and it is Pannones after all who declared war on the man). Why did they choose the hard route if they had nothing to hide? This issue is not going to go away… Pannones need to face up to the reality that they will either settle this matter by resolution or they are going to spend the next few years fighting more claims… the commercial lien of nine million pounds is lawfully enforceable… no Statute judge has the authority to defeat a common law process. They are acting beyond their authority – probably due to ignorance. Conclusion: The man has made a statutory declaration that he is NOT the legal fiction Michael Clarke. The court order that MICHAEL CLARKE appear – has been complied with. The order if it is claimed to be against the man – is void.

Hi, Anyone got a friend who works for a National paper.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: The silent majority
This letter says it all......
Subject: The silent majority
Its sad but true, It is difficult not to agree with the 72 year old man who wrote this letter, I notice there isnt a reply.
This is one of the best letters I have read for a long time, it puts it ALL into perspective. PLEASE PASS IT ON to everyone you can, its time BOTH parties stood up and listened.
This is our country and its being destroyed.
To David Cameron (Prime Minister) & Ed Milliband (Leader of the Opposition) ...
You BOTH Worry me ! ( In fact both of your Political parties worry the hell out of me !!!)
Over the last three years, I find myself becoming more and more fearful of the pair of you, and between you, you are turning this country into a place that I no longer feel at home in, or feel a part of! I watch you in parliament, and no, not just the two of you, but every politician that I see, stand up in parliament sneering at each other, and acting like children !!! (..and if you were my children, I would be ashamed of you all ... What an example to set!)
Although you would like us all to believe that you are putting the needs of this country at the forefront, NEITHER of you are doing that, you seem more interested in "one-up-manship ", in scoring off each other, & denigrating each other, to the detriment of this country & its people !!! It seems to be all about YOU as individuals, and not about what you can DO for this country ! It is fast becoming a place that I do not recognize, as the place I always thought, was the best place in the world to be !!! But no longer !!!
You are not listening to the people of this country !!! I am watching the deterioration of living standards in this country, (and according to you, on a world stage we are doing better than most countries ... REALLY ???) ... And yet the gap is widening between the "haves" and the "have-nots" . I see our homeless on the streets, our hospitals under-funded, and understaffed, our health system is an absolute mess and a disgrace .. And yet I see multi-millions of dollars being sent offshore, in aid to other countries, before attending to this country's needs !
I see the "selling off of water rights to foreign interests, WHY...? Especially when you go to great lengths to tell us that water is a finite resource, & supposedly, we must ALL be careful with how we use it, so that we ensure we have it for the future ? A Carbon Tax,( which you KNOW is just another tax ) which will make NO appreciable difference, to carbon emissions, AT ALL! A tax, which in spite of all your arguments FOR it, you are doing alone, when other major countries will NOT & DO NOT embrace it, or believe in it !
All that it will do for this country is put working families and small businesses behind the eight ball, .....what planet are you on, if you think that the tax we must pay will make even a scrap of difference to the effect of the carbon tax on people? Anyone can see the holes in that argument !!! Do you really think we are that dumb ???
Let's talk about Multiculturalism .....People have come here from other countries, for a better life, for more years than I have been alive ( I am 72 years old !)
Pre & Post war immigrants came for a better life, and settled in and became wonderful contributors to this country, ... All have contributed to the rich diversity of this country, and some descendants have even fought FOR this country, and they have become U.K.citizens and were glad to be ..and they had NO handouts from our Government either, ...they worked hard for everything! I have never before had a problem with all, or any, race of immigrants coming here. However, I DO NOW !!!
Please tell me why we have areas in towns and on large estates all over the country, where police do NOT, & will NOT go, for fear of their life ? Please tell me why we can no longer have religion in schools for fear of "OFFENDING" someone ? (The latest little gem is that they are not having or being funded, for chaplains any more, but Counsellors!) Please tell me why religious Christmas observances are no longer allowed in some schools for fear of OFFENDING someone ? Please tell me HOW Christmas decorations in some stores might OFFEND someone ? Please tell me why we have to have segregated days in some swimming centres for fear of "OFFENDING" someone ? Please tell me why we have some RADICAL clerics demanding Sharia Law in this country when if we were in THEIR country, this would NEVER be allowed? Please tell me why our laws need to be changed, so as not to OFFEND someone ? Please tell me why we are fast becoming a MINORITY voice, in our own country, because of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS ? Please tell me WHY Britons cannot legally wear a bike helmet covering their head in a bank and yet it is ok to wear a Burqa which covers the whole of the face ? And please tell me WHY, when those people who want asylum here can wreck our detention centres and STILL be accepted here ?
What does that say about just who and what are this government's priorities ? The British people that I speak to have genuine concerns about becoming a second class minority in our own country, and the reasons for it are some of the above. Are you so blind that you cannot see this ? And no, I am NOT racist !!! If I did not like Catholics or Protestants would I be considered racist ? Of course not!
Why is it, that if we object to what is happening in our country we are immediately labelled RACIST, in an attempt to shut us up ?
We are fighting Radical Muslims in Afghanistan , are we not ? I hear you say, yes but the Muslims we have here are "Not like that " . Well how would we know ? Do we hear ANY of them coming out & speaking AGAINST radicals ? I haven't, have you ? Islam is not compatible with ANY of the values that we hold here in Britain ! Are not the experiences of France and the Netherlands a examples of that? Why do you think it would be any different here ? We even have a British born "radical ", whose message is that Britain WILL become a Muslim country, under Sharia Law, & that we had "better get used to it ".
Will both of you grow some "balls", and start sticking up for this country and its people ? We are the people who put you where you are and PAY you to look after our interests ! And you are NOT doing that by any stretch of the imagination !!! I would appreciate an answer from both of you, if only to convince me that once again I am not talking to a brick wall ! In case it has escaped both of you I would like to remind you that, in the U.K. Government is FOR THE PEOPLE ... OF THE PEOPLE ... & BY THE PEOPLE ... Never forget that because you sure have up till now !
Let us get this out to all - please keep forwarding and if you have people in the press or if you know Politicians - let them know we are dis-satisfied with their behaviour !

THE British Constitution Group

With the exception of a few thousand very powerful people, the entire world’s population, all seven billion of us, are trapped ... trapped into a criminal debt creating banking ‘system’ that has taken hundreds of years to perfect and to come to fruition. This ‘system’ results in enslavement and servitude. It creates dreadful unhappiness amongst ordinary decent people and causes wars, debt, starvation, pollution and environmental destruction. It feeds on greed, fear and division. It forces people onto the corporate treadmills of mass mindless production and mass mindless consumption. It uses lies, deception, intimidation and entrapment at all times. It is a system that is so clever and so cunning that most of the world is completely oblivious to its existence. It is a system that allows a few winners at the expense of a huge number of losers. It is a system that considers itself to be unbeatable and indestructible and is now so arrogant that it believes it can control everything and everyone on its terms. It is a system where psychopaths and sociopaths can flourish. And without question the centre of this system, the heart of this global corporate beast is the innocent sounding Square Mile known as the City of London.

Put very simply, the banking dynasties, such as the House of Rothschild, control the political processes around the world to such an extent that their network of private central banks have the right to create money completely out of thin air and then charge interest on that ‘nothingness’. The polite term is ‘Fractional Reserve Lending’ but in reality it is just simple fraud. The result is that the whole world is currently drowning in a sea of fraudulent debt.

The USA now has a National Debt of over 16 trillion dollars, whilst the UK owes its creditors over one trillion pounds. The planned contagion of spiralling and unlawful debt is now sweeping over Europe with a renewed vigour. Greece and Spain are being torn apart by appalling austerity measures to the point that civil war or military intervention are now being openly talked about on the streets. Italy is giving all the signs that its economy is now entering into very stormy waters indeed. Ireland, Portugal, France and Belgium are already in a mess and are unlikely to see their debts become more manageable. Tens of millions of people have experienced a major downturn in their quality of life, along with their prospects for a more secure and better future, as unlawful austerity measures brought in by corrupt politicians begin to bite. Even the stronger economies of Germany, The Netherlands and Luxembourg have now been downgraded by Moody’s, the Rothschild controlled credit rating agency.

A Simple Solution To End This Madness – The Greenback:

What is happening to all of us is criminal. However, there is a very simple solution that the banking dynasties do not want you to know about.

At the height of the American Civil War, the US Treasury warned President Lincoln that further funding would be needed if the Federal North was to have the resources needed to defeat the Confederate South. The President initially went to the Rothschilds and the private banks who wanted between 24 and 36 per cent interest. Lincoln knew that if he agreed to take loans from the bankers that he would be putting his country into a debt noose that would strangle the economic prosperity out of his country and which would be almost impossible to pay off.

On the advice of a businessman with proven integrity, Colonel Dick Taylor from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln made the decision to print debt-free and interest-free paper money based on nothing more than the honour of the American Government. Called ‘Greenbacks’ because they were coloured green on one side only, the US Treasury issued 450 million dollars worth of these notes and they were immediately accepted as legal tender by a willing and grateful nation. The war was eventually won and this very popular new paper currency seemed set to continue. In the words of Lincoln himself:

"The government should create issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers..... The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power

Senate document 23, Page 91. 1865

$5 Greenback

However, the response by the private bankers to this sudden threat to their banking empire was swift and brutal as this extract from The Times of London in 1865 shows:

" If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedence in the history of the civilised governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

On Good Friday, April 14th 1865, a lone gunman ended the presidency of Abraham Lincoln. Sadly, his Greenback legacy died with him as the private bankers managed to ‘persuade’ Congress to revoke this successful initiative in favour of the debt creating National Banking Act which eventually led to the formation of the privately run Federal Reserve in 1913. Since then, America’s unlawful debt has risen to over 16 trillion dollars.

"I have two enemies; the Southern army in front of me and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in the rear is my greatest foe." Abraham Lincoln

The solution for dealing with private debt-creating bankers is simple. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to stop any sovereign government from issuing through its treasury its own interest-free money based on nothing more than the wealth and integrity of the nation. This is the big secret that the City of London would rather keep to itself. If this simple fact were to become mainstream then people everywhere would simply walk away and the entire banking system would completely collapse.

And now we come to a very little known historical episode that I alluded to at the beginning that takes this concept of the debt-free ‘Greenback’ from America to Britain ... and in so doing exposes the truly appalling values that are prevalent even today within the City of London.

The Great War And The Debt-free Bradbury Treasury Note:

Three weeks ago, as part of my ongoing research into the banking elite, I came across a fascinating book entitled The Financiers and the Nation by the Rt. Hon. Thomas Johnston, P.C., ex-Lord Privy Seal. It was written in 1934 and republished in 1994 by Ossian Publishers Ltd.

The text of this quite remarkable and rare book is available here.

In Chapter 6, entitled ‘Usury on the Great War’, I’ve selected the following paragraphs which I believe are both shocking and self-explanatory:

" WHEN the whistle blew for the start of the Great War in August 1914 the Bank of England possessed only nine millions sterling of a gold reserve, and, as the Bank of England was the Bankers' Bank, this sum constituted the effective reserve of all the other Banking Institutions in Great Britain.

The bank managers at the outbreak of War were seriously afraid that the depositing public, in a panic, would demand the return of their money. And, inasmuch as the deposits and savings left in the hands of the bankers by the depositing public had very largely been sunk by the bankers in enterprises which, at the best, could not repay the borrowed capital quickly, and which in several and large-scale instances were likely to be submerged altogether in the stress of war and in the collapse of great areas of international trade, it followed that if there were a widespread panicky run upon the banks, the banks would be unable to pay and the whole credit system would collapse, to the ruin of millions of people.

Private enterprise banking thus being on the verge of collapse, the Government (Mr. Lloyd George at the time was Chancellor of the Exchequer) hurriedly declared a moratorium, i.e. it authorized the banks not to pay out (which in any event the banks could not do), and it extended the August Bank Holiday for another three days. During these three or four days when the banks and stock exchanges were closed, the bankers held anxious negotiation with the Chancellor of the Exchequer. And one of them has placed upon record the fact that 'he (Mr. George) did everything that we asked him to do.' When the banks reopened, the public discovered that, instead of getting their money back in gold, they were paid in a new legal tender of Treasury notes (the £1 notes in black and the 10s. notes in red colours). This new currency had been issued by the State, was backed by the credit of the State, and was issued to the banks to prevent the banks from utter collapse. The public cheerfully accepted the new notes; and nobody talked about inflation.

To return, however, to the early war period, no sooner had Mr. Lloyd George got the bankers out of their difficulties in the autumn of 1914 by the issue of the Treasury money, than they were round again at the Treasury door explaining forcibly that the State must, upon no account, issue any more money on this interest free basis; if the war was to be run, it must be run with borrowed money, money upon which interest must be paid, and they were the gentlemen who would see to the proper financing of a good, juicy War Loan at 31/2 per cent, interest, and to that last proposition the Treasury yielded. The War was not to be fought with interest-free money, and/or/with conscription of wealth; though it was to be fought with conscription of life. Many small businesses were to be closed and their proprietors sent overseas as redundant, and without any compensation for their losses, while Finance, as we shall see, was to be heavily and progressively remunerated

Emergency Bradbury Treasury Notes (printed only on one side)

The real values of the private bankers and the City of London have been exposed for all to see. Whilst hundreds of thousands of British soldiers were dying on the killing fields of Flanders and elsewhere doing what they saw as their patriotic duty, British bankers, safely out of danger and not sharing the appalling conditions on the Western Front, were only interested in one thing – how to make obscene profits from Britain’s desperate efforts to win the war. To say that the private bankers and the City of London have the morals of sewer rats is to be extremely unkind to our little rodent friends. But this is the clincher. As a direct result of the greed and treason of the British private bankers in preventing the continuance of the Bradbury Treasury Notes, Britain’s National Debt went up from £650 million in 1914 to a staggering £7,500 million in 1919.

And this is where it all gets particularly interesting. The following is an extract from the official and current HM Treasury’s Debt Management Office website ... and it appears to be completely at odds with the account given by the Rt. Hon. Thomas Johnston.

"The threat of World War One pushed British banks into crisis; exacerbated further as half the world's trade was financed by British banks and as a consequence international payments dried up. In response to this crisis, John Maynard Keynes (the renowned economist), persuaded the Chancellor Lloyd George to use the Bank of England's gold reserves to support the banks, which ended the immediate crisis. Keynes stayed with the Treasury until 1919. The war years of 1914-18 had seen an increase in the National Debt from £650 million at the start of the war to £7,500 million by 1919. This ensured that the Treasury developed new expertise in foreign exchange, currency, credit and price control skills and were put to use in the management of the post-war economy. The slump of the 1930s necessitated the restructuring of the economy following World War II (the national debt stood at £21 billion by its end) and the emphasis was placed on economic planning and financial relations.

Why is there is no mention whatsoever of the £300 million of Bradbury debt-free paper Treasury Notes issued in 1914? Instead, it says Lloyd George, on the advice of John Maynard Keynes, used the Bank of England’s gold reserves which, according to Johnston, only amounted to £9 million. What is going on here? Who is telling the truth? Could it be that HM Government, the puppets of the City of London, don’t want you to know about the simple but effective concept of debt-free and interest-free Treasury Notes?

What Do The System-serving Politicians And "Economists" Say About The issuance Of Treasury Notes? As soon as the concept of the debt-free and interest-free Greenback Dollar (and now the Bradbury Pound) is raised in polite conversation with either a politician or an economist, two immediate knee jerk verbal reactions occur from these system-servers.

The first is to say that if a government suddenly starts printing its own money through its treasury based on the credit and wealth of the country, instead of going through its central bank, we would be heading towards what happened in the Weimar Republic in Germany in the early 1920s where hyperinflation spiralled out of control and a loaf of bread was bought with a barrow load of almost worthless paper money.

To this I just say look again at what actually happened in Germany at that time. It was not the Weimar’s treasury but it was the privately controlled central bank, the Reichsbank, who was printing the money, coupled with the extreme actions of currency speculators and foreign investors that caused all of the problems.

Hyperinflation could not happen as a result of the Bradbury Pound, because the democratically elected government would actually ‘govern’ ... now that is novel! Speculation would be prevented, and most importantly, the newly created money would be spent on a productive economy, rather than bankers bonuses.

The second reaction from system-servers is that the country is already printing its own money – it is called Quantative Easing, that mysterious cash injection into the economy which only seems to get as far as the banks and not to where it is actually needed. Only trouble is, it is the Bank of England doing the printing and not HM Treasury. Based around government issued Bonds (promissory notes based on the wealth of the nation), this complex process only increases the National Debt and it certainly doesn’t solve anything.

The simple truth is that people who serve the system and who have been ‘educated’ by such organisations as the Fabian inspired London School of Economics (LSE), are not suddenly going to bite the hand that gives them a very good living.

So what does all of this mean for us, the people? Before looking at this, let’s just consider for a moment what ‘money’ actually is. It is simply a convenient unit of exchange for goods and services that people have COMPLETE CONFIDENCE in. Now if HM Government were to issue debt-free and interest-free treasury notes through HM Treasury rather than the Bank of England in order to meet the needs and happiness of all the people whilst getting them out of unlawful debt, my guess is that people might have a lot of confidence in such a benign and benevolent financial system.

There is absolutely no defence for the present system whereby private bankers create money completely out of thin air for themselves to lend and then charge interest on that ‘nothingness’. The Bank of England, with its hidden controller the Bank for International Settlements based in Basel, Switzerland (often described as the Central Bank of Central Banks), dictate behind the scenes the fiscal policies and direction that our supposed sovereign and independent government must take. We are all prisoners of this utterly corrupt system and it’s time to confront it head on to collapse it.

If our government were to go down the path of a new Bradbury Treasury Note (as well as pursuing the banksters with Common Law for their crimes against humanity) then our debt burden would be removed overnight – there would be no deficit and no national debt. Under Common Law, all debts involving the use of fractional reserve lending by the central and private banks will be written off as they were arrived at by the use of fraud. Money would be immediately made available by HM Treasury to meet the essential needs of the country. The nation’s happiness, well-being and security would be taken care of without the need for an invasive and complex tax system. We would have Gross Domestic Happiness instead of Gross Domestic Product dictating humanity’s future.

None of this is rocket science – if the Spanish and Greek governments genuinely wanted to put right overnight the economic woes of their countries, they would immediately start printing and supplying interest-free and debt-free treasury notes based on the wealth and integrity of their respective countries. They would also tell the IMF, the EU and the Bank for International Settlements to go and whistle for their ‘money’! Why? Because it was created out of thin air, it didn’t exist in the first place, and the whole banking system is fraudulent ... in other words, see you in a common law court in front of a jury!!!! Banks, money and finance must exist to serve humanity, not the other way round. Our enslavement by unlawful debt can be ended overnight with one signature by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It really is that simple! ---------------

The People Vs The Government, DWP and Atos
a FRIEND had to walk past the city magistrates court & there is a queue of about at least 300 people all queuing for non payment of council tax OMG if I could take a photo (I won't to protect people's identity) you would never believe how many people there is. Kids are crying, people are getting stressed waiting & the queue goes round the block.
Welcome to Tory Britain 2013
There was a guy telling everyone about there rights outside the court & handing out a leaflet it said the following: 'this is retrospective action against me & the aforementioned bill is not be finalised before march 2014. This action is a waste of the courts time, the peoples time & more importantly the peoples money. I urge you to dismiss this case'.
Does anyone know what this means? Some solicitors in the queue also stated that they DO NOT have to pay something that is not yet law! Oh & a friend that was there said that when all those hundreds finally got in the doors they was told they didn't even have to attend court even though they'd all got letters to say they had to go & they was all told to go to the council tax dept instead to make payment arrangements!


An elderly, frail couple were charged a swingeing £44,400 by lawyers who handled their simple finances for four years when they were no longer capable of looking after themselves. Feliks and Rosemary Zakrzewski Overcharged: Feliks and Rosemary Zakrzewski Their case exposes a gaping loophole in the legal system, which leaves the elderly at the mercy of greedy solicitors who, relatives fear, can charge what they liked, while the family is powerless to intervene. Feliks and Rosemary Zakrzewski developed Alzheimer's disease in 2005. They went to live with their daughter Antoinette Tricker and her family in Suffolk. But because there was no Power of Attorney set up allowing her to act for them, the Court of Protection appointed a solicitor as their receiver to take charge of their financial affairs. The family was then helpless because the solicitor is answerable only to their client - in this case, a couple with Alzheimer's - who did not understand what was happening. There are 22,000 deputies (the new name for receivers) looking after the affairs of those who lack the mental capacity to act for themselves. They don't have to be solicitors; they can be family members, friends or the local authority. In the Zakrzewskis' case, the solicitor's first act was to take away their savings book, leaving them with only £100 each as spending money for four months. Mrs Tricker, 58, says: 'The loss of independence nearly drove my father over the edge. He took to offering his asthma nebuliser to passing strangers to raise cash.' Meanwhile, for handling their simple affairs, the solicitor ran up charges of nearly £19,000 in just ten months, charging £200 an hour, while giving Mrs Tricker just £70 a week to pay for her parents' living costs. All they had were their savings and a flat in Dorset to sell. Guidance on Court of Protection costs states that general management costs are 'unlikely to exceed' £3,000 a year. Since Mrs Tricker was not the client, her complaints to the solicitor and requests to see the bill could be ignored, while her parents' estate was being drained. 'After ten months, I had to beg the Office of the Public Guardian, which oversees receivers, to intervene,' she says. A new solicitor was appointed as the receiver in 2006, bringing the final total to £44,400. Her father died in 2007 aged 88 and her mother died last year aged 89. Although families can complain to the Court of Protection if they feel someone is abusing their powers, it is difficult to gather evidence without access to bills and bank statements. Caroline Bielanska, chairman of Solicitors for the Elderly, says: 'Without evidence, the only way is to go to the Office of the Public Guardian. They do an immediate risk-assessment to work out if there is cause for complaint and then examine the case. The majority of complaints arise because of sibling rivalry.' Deputies' bills are assessed by the Supreme Court Costs Office. Mrs Tricker finally received a copy of her parents' bills from the court last month. A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice, which oversees the Court of Protection, says: ' Anyone appointed to look after the affairs of a person who lacks capacity must always act in their best interests, and put their needs first and foremost. 'Since the Mental Capacity Act came into force in 2007, all deputies are supervised by the Office of the Public Guardian and must follow a comprehensive code of practice, which provides guidance on how to act and make decisions on behalf of people who lack capacity.' It costs more than £1,000 to have a deputy appointed, plus an annual charge for a security bond which can run into thousands. To avoid this route, you should draw up a Lasting Power of Attorney stating who you want to run your affairs if you become unable to handle them. There are two types: one for your finances and the other for your health and welfare. They cost £120 each and can't be used until they have been registered by the Office of the Public Guardian. The lengthy forms are complicated and readers have told us about long delays in processing them. Before October 2007, a simpler Enduring Power of Attorney was used. These are still valid. 'Dementia can strike at any time. Plan ahead and get a Lasting Power of Attorney before you, too, are sucked into this costly world,' says Mrs Tricker. Having reviewed the bill, Mrs Tricker has asked the court to rescind and reassess the first solicitor's costs. The hearing is set for June 3. READ more

READ about

Back to top

Under the Fraud Act 2006. Section 2 of the Act specifically states:
2 Fraud by false representation
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and (b) intends, by making the representation— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss. (2) A representation is false if— (a) it is untrue or misleading, and (b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading. (3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of— (a) the person making the representation, or (b) any other person. (4) A representation may be express or implied. (5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention). 3 Fraud by failing to disclose information A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose, and (b) intends, by failing to disclose the information— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss. 4 Fraud by abuse of position (1) A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person, (b) dishonestly abuses that position, and (c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss. (2) A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.

Warning to Government
This is not a request that requires an answer, it does however require a response – by way of action on your part that demonstrates that you understand its substance and the seriousness of our intent. The national collective political establishment has betrayed the ‘People’ by hijacking our sovereignty and engaging in criminal activities in a subservient role to a foreign power without our consent.  This is in defiance of our constitution and an act of treason. You do not need to know how many people we represent today, only how many we might represent tomorrow and you should know that our numbers grow daily.  This letter thus serves as your window of opportunity to make amends and give remedy for the crimes committed against us.  We will show compassion for those who recant and we will be ruthless with those who do not concede to the wishes of the people. Ignoring this letter is not an option… if you think it is, then this serves only to demonstrate that your intellect is subservient to your arrogance.  You may feel that you can ignore it because you are too powerful, but to do so is to underestimate the seething resentment that the people feel for the political establishment in general. You have acted in contempt of the principles of democracy and shown total disregard for our right to govern ourselves. For the past several decades the ‘People’ have been treated with extraordinary and total contempt by the collective political establishment.  It has not mattered which political party has been in office or “power” as you insist on calling it, nothing ever changes.  We are continually subjected to the same global agenda.  We have been used and abused like pawns in your game of supremacy in which a dynastic ruling class see themselves as ordained to rule as masters – with impunity, whilst we the people, as virtual slaves, are supposedly destined to obey – without question.  You have persistently and consistently undermined our democracy by agreeing to treaties with foreign political elites who have no business in our affairs. You have rewarded yourselves with the trappings of office – high salaries, luxuries denied most of us, privileges, bonuses, pensions, prestige and benefits that we can only dream of… whilst burdening us with ever-higher taxes, derisory pensions and declining standards of public services.  It is we who pay the price for your malfeasance. The story of our ‘People’ over the past several decades that will be told in the history books of tomorrow is the story of betrayal, greed, corruption, nepotism, treason and modern-day fascism – the latter of which manifests itself in the global agenda being imposed upon us against our will. The United Nations – a step process towards TOTAL global governance is now fully exposed.  Built on lies and deceit is being hoisted by its own petard – the edifice is crumbling but still the political elite like demented fools, continue to feed on their own delusions.  The docile masses, mesmerized by trivia, propaganda, complacency and ignorance have still somehow managed to grasp some basic elements of the truth, alerted almost certainly by the blatant and arrogant refusal of the political elite to tell the truth even when it stands proud in the rubble of political deceit and betrayal. The political classes are discredited at every level.  They rant about the benefits of our subjugation to a foreign enterprise, peace, prosperity and democracy where in reality chaos, dictatorship and corruption reign supreme.  Western economies are on the brink of collapse because of the corrupt banking cartels, there is visible resistance on the streets and people call for lawful rebellion.  But less known, there is clandestine resistance behind closed doors.  Whilst the majorities advocate a peaceful uprising, the extremes will always be in the mix and when passion and anger are fused and those aggrieved can find no remedy… violent resistance is as understandable as the passion for life itself. The police and militia that you currently rely on to defend yourselves against the people’s retribution… are made up of our own, they are not your people – and when they learn about your betrayal and your intent… AND THEY WILL – they will turn against you.  Their awakening, which you cannot stop, is your Achilles heel.  Your greatest fear must be that we will impose upon you the regimes and repression that you had planned for us. People are meeting in groups across the country, talking across oceans… they are disparate, disorganized and without an effective plan to repel the global agenda…as yet.  BUT a leadership is emerging… organizers are coordinating and small groups are linking to form larger groups.  The dichotomies of left v right, Christian v Muslim, black v white, Catholic v Protestant, which have been used to great effect to divide and conquer in the past, will find no favour in this war.  The call to arms that will unite us will be ‘the people v the global elite’ – the cry will cascade street to street and find easy passage and universal support – for our common purpose has greater value and strength than yours. We have a constitution – which you ignore.  We have been denied our democratic rights, regardless, we have clearly expressed our wishes, in one opinion poll after another, that we do not want to be governed by a foreign un-elected officialdom, but still you disregard us.  We are promised a referendum on our future, but then you ignore the results or recant.  You speak in support of our views when in opposition, but act to the contrary when we elect you. You consult with corporate executives, international bankers, non-government organizations, international charities, academia, foreign dignitaries, political elites, think tanks and lobbyist – collectively a tiny minority, who do not represent us.  These groups all emanate from the same social strata, with their own agendas to satisfy and all funded by the same cartel.  You take note of their every whim, but you care not a jot for what we think or what we want.  Your children are given jobs, with big salaries fresh from university and then rapidly climb the corporate ladder as a reward by the same corporate bodies who you have favoured with your decisions.  Our children must make their own way in an increasingly desperate world.  Your corporatism suppresses our freedoms with deliberate and malicious intent. You accommodate tyrants, dictators, arms dealers and all manner of dubious characters, with whom you are happy to keep company.  You turn a blind eye when the smell of money wafts your nostrils… it suppresses the stink of corruption and evil.  Your moral compasses are defunct… your values deplorable and motives despicable.  Our soldiers die to service your corporate agenda – their blood is on your hands. You are educated at the same elite schools and members of the same elite clubs and you allow these influences to override the consideration which should be paramount in service of the people.  You have adopted the “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” philosophy… because you have learnt from your predecessors that corruption and deception do indeed pay.  The United Nations Security Council is awash with it and you have determined to get your snout in the same trough.  You take comfort from the fact that you control those who have the authority to indict you for your criminality… because they too have fallen prey to the corruption.  You have sold off our national resources to your friends, divided communities, deprived villages and towns, undermined, destroyed and bulldozed indigenous communities. You have laid waste where once prosperity was enjoyed.  But you have not suffered… you have remained aloof, disengaged, uninvolved – removed from the debris and the misery that you have wreaked upon the rest of us. Our farms no longer feed us with the nutrients we require to sustain healthy lives, crippled by regulations, supranational mining contracts made to favour foreign farmers or ‘Coal Seam Gas Fracking’ that is destroying the once fertile soils of our landscape. Our armed forces are forced to commit crimes against humanity by the requirement to adhere to the unlawful and communist manifesto of the United Nations Charter and we see foreign troops being trained on our own soil on the pretence that they may be needed to protect us… when the reality is they are being trained to subdue us… to protect you from our vengeance.  Our children are victims of social engineering in the schools and declining standards of education.  They are being sexualized by explicit exposures before they have the emotional maturity to be able to cope.  You are destroying their minds and their childhoods. You have engineered a police state with legislation that empowers you at our expense and you have been blatant in your contempt for our democratic and constitution rights and our common law, which have been known to us for centuries.  You deny us our rights and our freedoms and contemptuously imply that you can provide us with a Bill of Rights.  Would we seriously trust a thief with our wallets?  You have corrupted our courts by appointing judges who are contemptuous of our common law and installed a law society that disperses Maritime/Admiralty Law through the peoples courts . You have dissected our nation and sold off our infrastructure.  We are forced to buy our own water from foreign corporations which grow rich on the back of our suffering.  You are then rewarded by them with lucrative directorships when you slip quietly from office with your bulging pensions.  You remain oblivious, unconcerned… disconnected.  We will no longer be ignored as you go about your globalist agenda.  We will resist your controlling and petty rules and regulations… we will resist your fines and penalty charges and challenge your corrupt and biased judges, we will defy the over-zealous police, and your oppressive and unlawful taxes. It is our intention to govern ourselves… we do not seek your permission – this is our right.  You have had your opportunity and you have failed.  We will take control of our own lives in stages, as and when it suits us.  Our numbers will grow as we show by example that prosperity is the natural consequence of honest and fair governance.  We will expose you for the parasites you are. This country has a constitution – which you ignore.  We have Magna Carta, we have trial by jury and habeas corpus.  We have our customs, traditions and common law.  We have the right of petition, free speech, and free movement and above all… we have the right to govern ourselves.  These are our inalienable rights – they are not privileges granted to us by you or your ilk.  They cannot be taken away or extinguished at the whim of political diktat or through corrupt judicial process and certainly not at the behest of foreign undemocratic institutions.  You have no authority to dictate… your duty is to serve. We are a sovereign nation… a proud people.  We have watched our country slowly destroyed… by you – we now see clearly what you have done… your purpose and your betrayal.  We will honour our inheritance – the freedoms fought for and secured for us, and we will ensure that we will pass this on to the next generation, to our children and theirs. You have been sent this letter by a constituent.  On sending a copy to you, they have also registered your name with our coordinators.  This will remain with us as evidence for your trial… for treason, when necessary.  It’s your choice. We The People - WE ARE SOVEREIGN


The two richest most evil families in the world are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Join us below and please like our page and share. They control the central banks of the world, the finance and supply both sides of all wars and control the finances of the Vatican and Occult. Rock-a-fella records artist Jay Z says he is in the la familia and long live the king. What he means by the la familia is that he is a Rockefeller puppet and made man inside of the Vatican controlled SINdicate. The roman priests that killed Christ are still the priests in Rome and the money changing families, kings, queens and pharaohs of the past have brought down their bloodlines and most are intermarried into these families. The Rockefeller Family Fortunes Murder by Injection- The Rockefeller Syndicate The Creature From Jekyll Island Standard Oil and the Rise of Hitler The Bush Family and the Rockefellers How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women The Rothschilds and Rockefellers Join Forces in Multi-Billion Dollar Deal The Rothschilds Exposed 1/3 The Rothschilds Exposed 2/3 The Rothschilds Exposed 3/3 The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, as is documented in the following timeline. However, before you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be. The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people. You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia. So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews. The Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9, states the following which would appear to be about these Ashkenazi Jews: "I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family. As you will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position through lies, manipulation and murder. Their bloodline also extends into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names: Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn. However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about. You are probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country, which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere. There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that deceptive tradition. Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly that they can put into positions of power when required. This started with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret sixth son. Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish. Please, therefore, do not automatically assume someone you see with the name Rothschild or any of the names listed above are part of the Rothschild criminal network. Furthermore and most importantly, the majority of Ashkenazi Jews are innocent and not part of this network. Check the facts out for yourself first, this article is designed to inform people who the enemy is, not single out people of a particular race or people with a particular surname, who may have nothing to do with this Rothschild criminal network. 1743: Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house. Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram (which geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666) which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later. 1753: Gutle Schnaper, an Ashkenazi Jew (future wife of Mayer Amschel Bauer), born to respected merchant, Wolf Salomon Schnaper. 1760: During this decade Mayer Amschel Bauer works for a bank owned by the Oppenheimers' in Hanover, Germany. He is highly successful and becomes a junior partner. Whilst working at the bank he becomes acquainted with General von Estorff. Following his father's death, Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take over his father's business. Bauer recognises the significance of the red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door ("Rot," is German for, "Red," "Schild," is German for, "Sign"). Now Mayer Amschel Rothschild, he discovers that General von Estorff is now attached to the court of Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, one of the richest royal houses in Europe, which gained its' wealth by the hiring out of Hessian soldiers to foreign countries for vast profits (a practice that continues today in the form of exporting, "peacekeeping," troops throughout the world). He therefore makes the General's re-acquaintance on the pretext of selling him valuable coins and trinkets at discounted prices. As he plans, Rothschild is subsequently introduced to Prince William himself who is more than pleased with discounted prices he charges for his rare coins and trinkets, and Rothschild offers him a bonus for any other business the Prince can direct his way. Rothschild subsequently becomes close associates with Prince William, and ends up doing business with him and members of the court. He soon discovers that loaning money to governments and royalty is more profitable than loaning to individuals, as the loans are bigger and are secured by the nation's taxes. 1769: Mayer Amschel Rothschild is given permission by Prince William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring that he is, "M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau." 1770: Mayer Amschel Rothschild draws up plans for the creation of the Illuminati and entrusts Ashkenazi Jew, Adam Weishaupt, a Crypto-Jew who was outwardly Roman Catholic, with its organization and development. The Illuminati is to be based upon the teachings of the Talmud, which is in turn, the teachings of Rabbinical Jews. It was to be called the Illuminati as this is a Luciferian term which means, keepers of the light. Mayer Amschel Rothschild marries Gutle Schnaper. 1773: Amschel Mayer Rothschild born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons. He like all his brothers who follow him, will enter the family business at the age of 12. 1774: Salomon Mayer Rothschild born. 1776: Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organisation of the Illuminati on May 1 of this year. The purpose of the Illuminati is to divide the goyim (all non-Jews) through political, economic, social, and religious means. The opposing sides were to be armed and incidents were to be provided in order for them to: fight amongst themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious institutions; and eventually destroy each other. Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons with this Illuminati doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand Orient to be their secret headquarters. This was all under the orders and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept has spread and is followed within Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day. Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance,and industry. They were instructed to follow the following methods in order to control people. 1) Use monetary and sex bri Share

We are now asking for
donations to our cause

talkshoe with karl lentz

Kevin Annett‎David Compan Hi everyone: Considering my upcoming journey to Europe, I thought it appropriate to share (below) what I wrote after being unlawfully incarcerated in a British prison and then deported, in May of 2011. This is especially made relevant with our criminal conviction of the traitorous Elizabeth Windsor and the nullification of the authority of the British "crown". So take heart! And enjoy. ........... No bomb that ever bursts shatters the crystal spirit: With Farid and others in a British prison by Kevin Annett May 31, 2011 I wear as a badge of honor my deportation from a country of liars and cut throats. - Big Bill Haywood, IWW leader and revolutionary, 1920 The filthy fiction calling itself the Crown of England finally vomited me from its midst this week, only five days before I was to speak of its crimes at the annual Against Child Abuse Rally in London's Trafalgar Square. I am proud to have shared a British prison with many freedom fighters over time, including my own free thinking ancestor Peter Annett, who was jailed and pilloried in London at the age of 70, in the year 1763, for writing "seditious blasphemy" against the Church of England. And that repression continues today, against innocent men and women still caught in the claws of the police state known as England. Here is what happened: The room is small, unventilated, and foul-smelling, and crammed with ten of us. I am the only white person there. A Malaysian mother with her four year old daughter sits in one corner, sobbing uncontrollably. Incarcerated for half a day, she’s one of the luckier ones: a young Turkish man called Farid has languished in here for nearly three days, isolated from his four children. Farid has lived in England for eleven years, doing sweat jobs for shit wages and loyally paying his taxes, but tomorrow he’ll be deported over a technicality in his work visa. There is no appeal allowed. His children will not accompany him. This is the Immigration Prison in Stansted airport, outside London. The time is the early hours of May 30, 2011. The net fell on me suddenly the night before, as I made my way through the border control desk after disembarking from the Netherlands. After asking me why I was coming to England, a banal twit in a uniform scanned my passport through his computer, and quickly looked shocked as he peered through thick lenses at the screen. He scuttled off to speak to his supervisor, who I watched through the glass window of his office as he looked at his own computer, nodded his head and said something to his crony. Triumphantly – I guess that as an employee of the private company Reliance Ltd. that runs British immigration services now, he gets extra points for deporting someone – The Twit returned and informed me with a whine of condescension that my giving public lectures was “unusual” for a tourist, that I was "suspect", and would therefore be barred from entering England. "What exactly am I suspected of doing?" I asked the guy. “But first you are to come this way” he motioned, ignoring my question like I hadn't said anything, and we walked to a tiny holding cell. The Twit left me alone in there for a half hour, I guess to make me sweat, but when he returned I was calmly whistling an Irish melody that seemed to annoy him to no end. “I bet you find your job difficult, you know, putting people through all this” I ventured to The Twit as he fiddled with his papers. Attempting a smile, he answered, “No, I enjoy it, actually. One meets very fascinating people in this line of work”. If only you knew, I thought, but said nothing. The Twit refused to give me his name when I asked, nor could I know the name of his supervisor. He also wasn’t wearing a badge number, although later he made a gaff when he donned another coat and I saw his number: 6676. “You’ll be in here tonight, until we can send you back from whence you came” The Twit informed me, gesturing to a white door. He knocked, and a stern young guy answered and glared at me like I was yesterday's trash. Then I was locked in with a whole crowd of dark skinned people. Despair gazed back at me from the sad eyes of my fellow prisoners who lay or sat around the room. They were all deflated, tired and beaten. A TV was blaring mindless crap at them so I walked over and switched it off. The young Turkish guy whose name was Farid looked surprised, and then he smiled at me weakly, and nodded. After my obligatory finger printing and photographing – I asked the Reliance goon if I could have a copy of the picture, since I looked pretty good, but he said no – I was locked back into the sparse room with my fellow detainees, and was told not to speak to any of them since that was against the rules. I just smiled at the goon, and ignored him. Most of the detainees didn’t want to talk. It was nearly midnight by then, and like prisoners tend to do, they had adapted to their incarceration and were mired in themselves. But Farid was too filled with grief about being robbed of his children to settle into apathy. “I will never see them again. They will be put with other families and then anything can happen to them. My youngest son is only a baby.” I remembered reading the day before how 586 children placed in the foster care system in England had somehow disappeared over the past year. Local child welfare officials had no explanation, apparently. To ride out his pain and the dull hours, Farid taught me some Turkish words that night, starting with “I love you” – it sounded like “selly sev yurum”. He laughed for the first time when he commented how the phrase might come in handy if I ever came to his country, but not if I said it to another man. “That’s not what I hear” I replied, and he laughed even harder. We held back the demons together during those slow and weary hours, as the others tried to sleep, and didn’t, and the Malaysian woman sang to her daughter while the Reliance thugs stared at us through a thick pane of glass. It ended for me at 9 am, when I was taken to a plane that would fly me back to Eindhoven. I said goodbye to Farid and wished him luck. The man took my hand gently and said “Allah”, pressing his other hand against his chest, and then pointing to my heart. I recalled then the last words in George Orwell's book Homage to Catalonia, in which he describes briefly meeting an Italian militia man who like Orwell was fighting Franco and his fascists during the Spanish civil war. They couldn't speak one another's language, but they shook hands and departed in different directions for the front lines, and Orwell never saw the Italian man again. In memory to this unknown stranger who had briefly taken his hand in comradeship, and who had probably died, Orwell wrote a poem to him that concluded, But the look I saw in your eyes, no power can disinherit. No bomb that ever burst shatters the crystal spirit. The night after my deportation, I stood in a crowd of singing and laughing revellers in a Dublin pub, tasting my freedom like a soothing ale, and thinking of where Farid might be, and grieving for him and his children in that part of me that never rests. I never felt unfree in jail; nor did Farid's own imprisonment and agony stop him from taking my hand in his, and blessing us. I've learned from so many Farids that the more they repress us, the sharper and stronger we get, like a gift. And what happened to me is simply boomeranging back now on the British government and its clumsy attempts to stop our Tribunal this fall. So be of good cheer, and let that hope propel your body and your life to continue to accompany your words. But never forget Farid, and his children ... and that Thing which is trying to imprison all of us through fear, and its other illusions.

Back to top

OMG~! I SEE the BIG PICTURE. I just found out that China's money is debt and interest free because they issue their own money and have locked out the Rothschild Central Bankers. So has Putin and Russia. They Rothschilds think they are the Kings on the Chessboard and are planning to take out both Russia AND China to regain financial control over their markets.
The Rothschilds Elite are Psychopathic Control Freaks and whomever they cannot control they will seek to destroy, as if they have some kind of Divine Claim upon all flesh to pay tribute to them, or maybe to their Master, Lucifer, for whom they are the Earthly and Human Representatives.
The Rothschilds are the Vatican's Bankers and the Vatican is the visible Institution of the Antichrist- or that which is against the Divine Order. The Antagonist of Life Itself.
Now, the Zionist Rothschilds are following their Luciferian marching orders, having helped to established a Jewish State in Palestine in 1948 according to the Balfour Declaration, supposedly as reparations to the Jews after the Nazi atrocities- but in fact, it was a way for the Luciferians to create a Zionist State, co-opt the Jewish Homeland Movement and to round up and gather all Jews into one central location for the next phase of their Luciferian Plan.
Now, since China and Russia have essentially regained total control their own financial markets and have said "Go F*ck Yourselves" to the Vatican/Babylonian Banksters, the Rothschilds now intend to incite a fiery conflagration in the Middle East which will accomplish 2 of Lucifer's primary objectives:
1) The destruction of the Jews
2) The submission of China and Russia to the Rothschilds Banking Elite- that is, to the Luciferian Vatican.
First, they will create a False Flag scenario that incites Israel to strike against Iran- another country without a single Rothschilds-owned Bank.
Since Russia is a strong ally of Iran, they will rush to assist. The US will then get involved to stand with it's ally, Israel, against Russia.
China, as a major ally of Russia will then get involved to stand with them against the US.
The resulting conflagration will deplete and make weak all 3 Superpowers and Israel will likely be reduced to rubble.
Then the Rothschilds step in with the final implementation of their Globalist NWO Agenda- Full Spectrum Dominance, Panopticon Surveillance and Total Control through a micro-chipped population.
You see, we are the only ones that can prevent this nightmare scenario from unfolding. We must expose the Central Bankster Elite and all their wicked works.
I for one deny "Satan", and all his "wicked works".
I affirm the Reality that has been gifted to us by the Creator and swear my love and allegiance to the Creator, and to Our Lady Earth, who has suffered terribly at the hands of these corrupted beings known as the Central Banking Elite and their minions.
By exposing their innumerable atrocities, we will emancipate humanity from it's mental slavery and move into the greatest period of freedom and happiness that humanity has ever experienced.
The Whole World is waiting on us.
If not us, who? If not now, when?



Hello chaps and lassies. My friend got a parking ticket in a hospital car park (£70) and i have told him DO NOT PAY. Can anybody help me with some links for the net and good solid info please. I am merely a white belt in being free and my knowledge is limited. Any help would be very greatly appreciated.

It is my understanding from Halsbury’s Laws of England that the Oath does not authorize any Judge or Magistrate in the Common Law Jurisdiction of England and Wales to adjudicate any Hearing in which the matter is to be decided in any way other than by a Jury. Furthermore, in the Hearing in question held at the Magistrates Court in TOWN on DATE there was no Injured Party, no corpus delecti, and no Defendant. Therefore the Common Law Oath under which the Judge/Magistrate claimed authority is unlawful and constitutes an offence contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. The fact that the Judge/Magistrate sat is considered to be prima facie evidence of the offence. It is my understanding from reading Halsbury’s Laws of England that no MAGISTRATES or COUNTY COURT should exist, and when someone is summoned it is an ADMINISTRATIVE meeting without ANY lawful existence. If this has transpired it is in breach of the Fraud Act 2006 (see 4, 5 and 6 below) as the Judge/Magistrate, Clerk and Prosecutor step outside their lawful remit, and become personally liable. It is my understanding that demanding monies by false representation is in breach of the Fraud Act 2006, Section 2 It is my understanding that demanding monies without providing full disclosure is in breach of The Fraud Act 2006, Section 3 It is my understanding that demanding monies without providing evidence of authority or jurisdiction is in breach of The Fraud Act 2006, Section 4 It is my understanding that Halsbury’s on Administrative Law 20-11: “The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is no authority for administrative courts in this country and no act can be passed to legitimise them.” It is my understanding that according to Observance of due Process of Law 1368 section 3: “None shall be put to answer without due Process of Law. At the Request of the Commons by their Petitions put forth in this Parliament, to eschew the Mischiefs and Damages done to divers of his Commons by false Accusers, which oftentimes have made their Accusations more for Revenge and singular Benefit, than for the Profit of the King, or of his People, which accused Persons, some have been taken, and sometime caused to come before the King’s Council by Writ, and otherwise upon grievous Pain against the Law: It is assented and accorded, for the good Governance of the Commons, that no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land: And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error.”

Anna von Reitz 03.03.2016
39 mins · .
Is America Under a Judgment?
I have been asked in recent days by many earnest people if America is under a judgment and if we are condemned by Heaven. I want all the innocent victims of all this criminality and fraud to know that no, neither America nor Americans nor any other victims of crime are subject to any such judgment. Far from it. We are being upheld and guided and protected every step of the way.
The cause of the problem is a spiritual war--- the last gasp of Lucifer and his minions trying to resist their own inevitable defeat and still misleading men to follow them and their lies into one more blood-letting debacle. Consider it a final test, like Examination Day. Do you know the right answers yet?
If you don't there are plenty of politicians, bankers, and lawyers ready to lead you astray one more time, to try to cast off the blame for their sins on any scapegoat they can find.
Throughout our lives on Earth all the Children of God of every religion and faith are presented with two choices---- the Truth and the Lie.
The Truth is represented by a Small Voice. It's humble and hard to hear in the push and shove of daily life, especially now when Mankind has been set on a treadmill of endless work without rest, and even Mothers have been separated from their children and made to work like beasts in the field. Under such brutal and unnatural conditions, it is harder than ever to hear this Small, Quiet Voice. The Small Voice tells us the Truth, which often is strange to our ears and our thinking, because, first of all, we aren't trained to listen for the Small Voice, so we tend to hear it in bits and snatches, and usually when for one reason or another our normal lives have been disrupted by a major event, like a death in our family, a move to a new home where we have no friends close by, or a traumatic illness or injury that leaves us stunned and silent---- suddenly listening, and therefore able to hear the Small Voice.
Sometimes we hear the Small Voice in our dreams and our dreams become visions. We reconnect to the world of the Small Voice for a brief time and awaken with renewed strength and peace and knowledge and purpose. This happens for all of us, but we forget, and then we forget to remember.
The Small Voice tells us ---unapologetically-- that we ARE mortal and that life is fleeting by, that the important things really are free, that we are loved and not alone, that we are completely surrounded by miracles every day of our lives. It tells us not to be afraid, to strive to know ourselves, and to assert our Truth, whatever that Truth may be. It urges us to value and care for ourselves and for others and to walk in humility, accepting our mistakes, and learning to see the humor in our condition.
The Small Voice tells us that we live in a world of endless abundance, and that there is nothing to fear, that we are very fortunate and blessed. It says we have gifts and skills and abilities aplenty. It says we are able to discipline ourselves and meet our goals and build our dreams. It says we can live at peace, that there is always enough to go around if we share with each other.
The Lie, on the other hand, is represented by a big, booming, constantly yammering Loud Voice. It jumps out at us at every opportunity---day and night--- from radios and televisions and movie screens and now computers. It screams in headlines that frighten us with news of death and endless threats. It titillates our worst instincts and steadily demands that we buy, buy, buy. It preaches that we are immortal somehow, that we have endless time and that we need to be endlessly young.
The Loud Voice says we have to meet impossible standards of physical beauty, have to have the right house, the right car, the right husband or wife, even the right refrigerator. We have to be in style. We have to be thin. We have to speak in euphemisms. Most of all, we have to be rich. We have to guard our backs and be selfish and let the other guy sink or swim. We have to pull for "our side" and fight for every scrap. And no matter what we do, what we achieve, we will never be good enough.
Like a nasty, annoying, overbearing radio announcer snarling at you over breakfast, the Loud Voice spews an endless stream of drivel, restlessly proclaiming that you, yourself, your wants, your needs, your fears, your house, your job, your bank account are all that is important in the world, yet you are inadequate, incompetent, impotent, and no matter what, you are never rich enough. And you have to hide these facts from the neighbors at any cost.
It's all about which Voice you listen to. It's about who you are and what you think and what---in the final analysis-- you value and believe.
There are two ways to look at Jesus on the Cross.
For a Christian, His Suffering is the ultimate Communion with all the rest of us. No matter how much we suffer, what we are called upon to endure, we know our Lord has gone before us and suffered all of it and worse. His Cross calls us to reflect on our own sins and failings and selfishness---not to despair, but to own them and repent like Peter, and rise up each morning more determined to follow Him, so that He is part of us and we are part of Him, even, yes, His Suffering.
For a Satanist, the Cross is an emblem of the Power of Lucifer, a dirty joke that never ceases to please, a reminder of Satan's power over the flesh, his seemingly endless ability to deceive people and turn them against each other, his ability to conquer reason and decency with lust and greed, his half-truths and subtle words, his fat and easy ways to profit on the gullible, his ability to steer us off course, to marginalize and rationalize everything until we can no longer tell Truth from Falsehood.
Make the effort now to direct your attention to what is True and what is right. Ask and seek real discernment. I think you will agree that the suffering people of America who have been defrauded and coerced and threatened for so long are the ones that God purposes to save, and that the murderous, lying, racketeers doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC. and the Trustees of this bankrupt governmental services corporation are the ones under Judgment here.

Back to top